Federal Acquisition Regulation; Irrevocable Letters of Credit, 61743-61745 [2014-24239]
Download as PDF
61743
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Small Entity Compliance Guide.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
This document is issued
under the joint authority of DOD, GSA,
and NASA. This Small Entity
Compliance Guide has been prepared in
accordance with section 212 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. It consists of a
summary of the rules appearing in
Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC)
2005–77, which amends the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR). An
asterisk (*) next to a rule indicates that
a regulatory flexibility analysis has been
prepared. Interested parties may obtain
SUMMARY:
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Chapter 1
[Docket No. FAR 2014–0052, Sequence No.
5]
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Federal Acquisition Circular 2005–77;
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
AGENCIES:
further information regarding these
rules by referring to FAC 2005–77,
which precedes this document. These
documents are also available via the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
DATES:
October 14, 2014.
For
clarification of content, contact the
analyst whose name appears in the table
below. Please cite FAC 2005–77 and the
FAR case number. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202–501–4755.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
RULES LISTED IN FAC 2005–77
Item
Subject
* I .................
* II ................
* III ...............
Federal Contracting Programs for Minority-Owned and Other Small Businesses ..................................
Irrevocable Letters of Credit ....................................................................................................................
Uniform Procurement Identification ..........................................................................................................
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Summaries for each FAR rule follow.
For the actual revisions and/or
amendments made by these rules, refer
to the specific item numbers and
subjects set forth in the documents
following these item summaries. FAC
2005–77 amends the FAR as specified
below:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Item I—Federal Contracting Programs
for Minority-Owned and Other Small
Businesses (FAR Case 2009–016)
This final rule amends the FAR to
remove certain coverage involving
procurements with small disadvantaged
business concerns and certain
institutions of higher education that is
based on authority which has expired
and been found to be unconstitutional
by the Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit. These changes harmonize the
FAR with current statutory authorities.
The impact of this rule on small
businesses should be minimal, given
that the coverage applied only to prime
contracting opportunities in specific
North American Industry Classification
System codes, and was applicable to
only three Government agencies, (DoD,
NASA and U.S. Coast Guard). The
obligation of Federal Agencies to meet
or exceed the statutory five percent
small disadvantaged business goals at
the prime and subcontracting levels are
not affected by this rule.
Item II—Irrevocable Letters of Credit
(FAR Case 2011–023)
This final rule amends the FAR to
remove all references to Office of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Oct 10, 2014
Jkt 235001
FAR case
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP)
Pamphlet No. 7, Use of Irrevocable
Letters of Credit (ILC). This change is
necessary to update the sources of data
required to verify the credit worthiness
of a financial entity issuing or
confirming an ILC.
This final rule has no significant
impact on the Government and
contractors including small business
entities and imposes no new
requirements. Contracting Officers are
currently required to verify the credit
worthiness of a financial entity issuing
or confirming an ILC and will benefit
from this updated information to
conduct an accurate analysis.
Item III—Uniform Procurement
Identification (FAR Case 2012–023)
This final rule amends the FAR to
implement a uniform Procurement
Instrument Identification (PIID)
numbering system, which will require
the use of Activity Address Codes
(AACs) as the unique identifier for
contracting offices and other offices, in
order to standardize procurement
transactions across the Federal
Government. Agencies shall comply
with the new PIID procedures in FAR
subpart 4.16 by October 1, 2017, for new
solicitations and contract awards.
Dated: September 30, 2014.
William Clark,
Acting Director, Office of Government-Wide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Government-Wide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–24242 Filed 10–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2009–016
2011–023
2012–023
Analyst
Uddowla.
Davis.
Loeb.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1, 28, and 52
[FAC 2005–77; FAR Case 2011–023; Item
II; Docket 2011–0023, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AM53
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Irrevocable Letters of Credit
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
remove all references to Office of
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP)
Pamphlet No. 7, Use of Irrevocable
Letters of Credit, and also provide
updated sources of data required to
verify the credit worthiness of a
financial entity issuing or confirming an
irrevocable letter of credit (ILC).
DATES: Effective: November 13, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement Analyst,
at 202–219–0202, for clarification of
content. For information pertaining to
status or publication schedules, contact
the Regulatory Secretariat at 202–501–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14OCR2.SGM
14OCR2
61744
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
A. Summary of Significant Changes
This final rule reflects no change to
the proposed rule.
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register at
78 FR 26573 on May 7, 2013, to remove
all references to OFPP Pamphlet No. 7,
Use of Irrevocable Letters of Credit, and
provide updated sources of data
required to verify the credit worthiness
of a financial entity issuing or
confirming an ILC.
OFPP Pamphlet No. 7 provided
detailed guidance for implementing
policy letter 91–4, Use of Irrevocable
Letters of Credit, for Government
contracts. A prior FAR final rule (FAR
Case 2000–605, Rescission of Office of
Federal Procurement Policy Letters, 65
FR 36014) removed the FAR references
to OFPP Policy Letter 91–4 along with
several other policy letters that were
rescinded by OFPP, effective March 30,
2000 (see 65 FR 16968). However, the
reference to OFPP Pamphlet No. 7
remained in FAR part 28 because the
information was considered relevant
and provided, among other information,
a listing of available quantitative and
qualitative credit rating institutions and
resources, formats for ILCs, and other
useful data.
FAR 28.204–3 currently cites OFPP
Pamphlet No. 7 at paragraphs (g)(1) and
(h)(1) as an available resource that may
be used to obtain information on credit
rating services or investment grade
ratings of financial entities issuing or
confirming ILCs because it provides
overarching policy and specific
guidance on the use of ILCs, but some
of the information is outdated.
Therefore, instead of referencing the
OFPP Pamphlet, this rule—
(1) Extracts from the OFPP Pamphlet
the relevant and current information for
inclusion in the FAR; and
(2) Provides additional sources of data
required to verify the credit worthiness
of a financial entity issuing or
confirming an ILC, as summarized on
the Web sites of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (https://www2.
fdic.gov/idasp/index.asp) and Securities
and Exchange Commission https://www.
sec.gov/answers/nrsro.htm).
Five respondents submitted
comments on the proposed rule.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
4755. Please cite FAC 2005–77, FAR
Case 2011–023.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
B. Analysis of Public Comments
The Regulatory Secretariat received
public comments from five entities in
response to the proposed rule. A
discussion of these comments is
provided as follows:
II. Discussion and Analysis
The Civilian Agency Acquisition
Council and the Defense Acquisition
Regulations Council (the Councils)
reviewed the comments in the
development of the final rule. A
discussion of the comments is provided
as follows:
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA have prepared
a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(FRFA) consistent with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The
FRFA is summarized as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Oct 10, 2014
Jkt 235001
1. Support for the Proposed Rule
Comment: Two respondents
expressed support for the rule.
Response: The Councils acknowledge
the public support for this rule.
2. Standby Letters of Credit
Comment: Five respondents
recommended that the proposed rule
recognize and permit the use of standby
letters of credit, in accordance with
International Standby Practices (ISP 98),
as described in International Chamber of
Commerce Publication No. 590.
Response: The intent of the proposed
rule, as stated in the published
preamble is as follows: ‘‘. . . to remove
all references to the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy (OFPP) Pamphlet
No. 7, Use of Irrevocable Letters of
Credit (ILC), and also provide updated
sources of data required to verify the
credit worthiness of a financial entity
issuing or confirming an ILC.’’ As a
result, the inclusion of ISP 98 is
considered to be a substantive change
and thus beyond the scope of this case.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
This action is necessary to remove all
references to OFPP Pamphlet No. 7, Use of
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Irrevocable Letters of Credit, and provide
updated sources of data required to verify
credit worthiness of a financial entity issuing
or confirming an ILC.
The objective of the rule is to provide upto-date and readily available information on
requirements regarding credit rating for the
financial institution issuing or confirming an
ILC.
This will apply to all contracts for services,
supplies, or construction, when a bid
guarantee or performance and payment
bonds are required. 40 U.S.C. 3131 requires
performance and payment bonds for any
construction contract exceeding $100,000;
this was raised for inflation to $150,000 (see
FAR 1.109). Any person required to furnish
a bond has the option to furnish a bond
secured by an ILC.
For construction contracts valued at
$30,000 to $150,000, alternative payment
protection is required, which may involve an
ILC. Generally, agencies do not require bonds
for other than construction contracts.
According to data from the Federal
Procurement Data System, in FY 2011 there
were about 58,000 new awards for
construction and construction maintenance,
of which 41,000 were awarded to small
businesses (about 70 percent). If we estimate
that 10 percent of these awards involve an
ILC, then this rule applies to approximately
4,100 small businesses.
The rule only removes references to OFPP
Pamphlet No. 7 and replaces these references
with information relative to sources of data
required to verify an ILC that generally
replicates what was in the pamphlet. There
are no new reporting, recordkeeping, or
compliance requirements. The rule does not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules.
No significant alternatives to the rule were
identified that would accomplish the
objectives of the rule. We do not foresee any
significant economic impact of the rule on
small entities. The basic requirements remain
unchanged; the requirements of the pamphlet
are directly stated, some of the references
have been updated, and a Web site provided
for access to a list of Nationally Recognized
Statistical Rating Organizations.
There were no significant issues raised by
the public in response to the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis.
Interested parties may obtain a copy
of the FRFA from the Regulatory
Secretariat. The Regulatory Secretariat
has submitted a copy of the FRFA to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any new
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). However, there is a preexisting requirement at FAR 52.228–14
for offerors/contractors to provide the
contacting officer a credit rating that
indicates the financial institutions have
the required credit rating as of the date
E:\FR\FM\14OCR2.SGM
14OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
of issuance of the ILC. OMB Control
Number 9000–0045, titled: Bid
Guarantees, Performance and Payment
Bonds, and Alternative Payment
Protections, covers the information
collection requirements associated with
alternative payment protections
(including ILCs) and acceptable security
for bonds (including ILCs). ILCs are
seldom offered as alternative payment
protection or security for a bid bond,
performance bond, or payment bond.
The negligible burden of providing a
credit rating along with the required ILC
is already sufficiently covered by the
approved burden hours in 9000–0045.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1, 28,
and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: September 30, 2014.
William F. Clark,
Acting Director, Office of Government-Wide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Government-Wide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
amend 48 CFR parts 1, 28, and 52 as set
forth below:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 1, 28, and 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.
PART 1—FEDERAL ACQUISITION
REGULATIONS SYSTEM
1.106
[Amended]
2. Amend section 1.106, in the list
following the introductory text, by
adding in numerical sequence, FAR
segment ‘‘52.228–14’’ and its
corresponding OMB Control No. ‘‘9000–
0045’’.
■
PART 28—BONDS AND INSURANCE
3. Amend section 28.204–3 by
revising the section heading and
paragraphs (a), (g), and (h) to read as
follows:
■
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
28.204–3
Irrevocable letter of credit.
(a) Any person required to furnish a
bond has the option to furnish a bond
secured by an irrevocable letter of credit
(ILC) in an amount equal to the penal
sum required to be secured (see 28.204).
A separate ILC is required for each
bond.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Only federally insured financial
institutions rated investment grade shall
issue or confirm the ILC. Unless the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:24 Oct 10, 2014
Jkt 235001
financial institution issuing the ILC had
letter of credit business of at least $25
million in the past year, ILCs over $5
million must be confirmed by another
acceptable financial institution that had
letter of credit business of at least $25
million in the past year.
(1) The offeror/contractor is required
by paragraph (d) of the clause at 52.228–
14, Irrevocable Letter of Credit, to
provide the contracting officer a credit
rating from a recognized commercial
rating service that indicates the
financial institution has the required
rating(s) as of the date of issuance of the
ILC.
(2) To support the credit rating of the
financial institution(s) issuing or
confirming the ILC, the contracting
officer shall verify the following
information:
(i) Federal insurance: Each financial
institution is federally insured.
Verification of federal insurance is
available through the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) institution
directory at the Web site https://www2.
fdic.gov/idasp/index.asp.
(ii) Current credit rating. The current
credit rating for each financial
institution is investment grade and that
the credit rating is from a Nationally
Recognized Statistical Rating
Organization (NRSRO). NRSROs can be
located at the Web site https://www.sec.
gov/answers/nrsro.htm maintained by
the SEC.
(3) The rating services listed in the
Web site https://www.sec.gov/answers/
nrsro.htm use different rating scales
(e.g., AAA, AA, A, BBB, BB, B, CCC, CC,
C, and D; or Aaa, Aa, A, Baa, Ba, B, Caa,
Ca, and C) to provide evaluations of
institutional credit risk; however, all
such systems specify the range of
investment grade ratings (e.g., BBB–
AAA or Baa–Aaa in the examples in this
section) and permit evaluation of the
relative risk associated with a specific
institution. If the contracting officer
learns that a financial institution’s
rating has dropped below investment
grade level, the contracting officer shall
give the contractor 30 days to substitute
an acceptable ILC or shall draw on the
ILC using the sight draft in paragraph (g)
of the clause at 52.228–14.
(h) A copy of the Uniform Customs
and Practice (UCP) for Documentary
Credits, 2006 Edition, International
Chamber of Commerce Publication No.
600, is available from: ICC Books USA,
1212 Avenue of the Americas, 21st
Floor, New York, NY 10036; Phone:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
61745
212–703–5066; Fax: 212–391–6568; EMail: iccbooks@uscib.org; Via the
Internet at: https://store.iccbooksusa.net.
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
5. Amend section 52.228–14 by
revising the date of the clause and
paragraphs (d), (e)5, and (f)5 to read as
follows:
■
52.228–14
Irrevocable Letter of Credit.
*
*
*
*
*
IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT (Nov
2014)
*
*
*
*
*
(d)(1) Only federally insured financial
institutions rated investment grade by a
commercial rating service shall issue or
confirm the ILC.
(2) Unless the financial institution issuing
the ILC had letter of credit business of at least
$25 million in the past year, ILCs over $5
million must be confirmed by another
acceptable financial institution that had letter
of credit business of at least $25 million in
the past year.
(3) The Offeror/Contractor shall provide
the Contracting Officer a credit rating that
indicates the financial institutions have the
required credit rating as of the date of
issuance of the ILC.
(4) The current rating for a financial
institution is available through any of the
following rating services registered with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) as a Nationally Recognized Statistical
Rating Organization (NRSRO). NRSRO’s can
be located at the Web site https://www.sec.
gov/answers/nrsro.htm maintained by the
SEC.
(e) * * *
5. This Letter of Credit is subject to the
Uniform Customs and Practice (UCP) for
Documentary Credits, International Chamber
of Commerce Publication No.___ (Insert
version in effect at the time of ILC issuance,
e.g., ‘‘Publication 600, 2006 edition’’) and to
the extent not inconsistent therewith, to the
laws of lll[State of confirming financial
institution, if any, otherwise State of issuing
financial institution].
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
5. This confirmation is subject to the
Uniform Customs and Practice (UCP) for
Documentary Credits, International Chamber
of Commerce Publication No.___ (Insert
version in effect at the time of ILC issuance,
e.g., ‘‘Publication 600, 2006 edition’’) and to
the extent not inconsistent therewith, to the
laws oflll[State of confirming financial
institution].
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–24239 Filed 10–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
E:\FR\FM\14OCR2.SGM
14OCR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61743-61745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24239]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 1, 28, and 52
[FAC 2005-77; FAR Case 2011-023; Item II; Docket 2011-0023, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000-AM53
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Irrevocable Letters of Credit
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to remove all references to Office
of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) Pamphlet No. 7, Use of Irrevocable
Letters of Credit, and also provide updated sources of data required to
verify the credit worthiness of a financial entity issuing or
confirming an irrevocable letter of credit (ILC).
DATES: Effective: November 13, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement
Analyst, at 202-219-0202, for clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202-501-
[[Page 61744]]
4755. Please cite FAC 2005-77, FAR Case 2011-023.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a proposed rule in the Federal
Register at 78 FR 26573 on May 7, 2013, to remove all references to
OFPP Pamphlet No. 7, Use of Irrevocable Letters of Credit, and provide
updated sources of data required to verify the credit worthiness of a
financial entity issuing or confirming an ILC.
OFPP Pamphlet No. 7 provided detailed guidance for implementing
policy letter 91-4, Use of Irrevocable Letters of Credit, for
Government contracts. A prior FAR final rule (FAR Case 2000-605,
Rescission of Office of Federal Procurement Policy Letters, 65 FR
36014) removed the FAR references to OFPP Policy Letter 91-4 along with
several other policy letters that were rescinded by OFPP, effective
March 30, 2000 (see 65 FR 16968). However, the reference to OFPP
Pamphlet No. 7 remained in FAR part 28 because the information was
considered relevant and provided, among other information, a listing of
available quantitative and qualitative credit rating institutions and
resources, formats for ILCs, and other useful data.
FAR 28.204-3 currently cites OFPP Pamphlet No. 7 at paragraphs
(g)(1) and (h)(1) as an available resource that may be used to obtain
information on credit rating services or investment grade ratings of
financial entities issuing or confirming ILCs because it provides
overarching policy and specific guidance on the use of ILCs, but some
of the information is outdated. Therefore, instead of referencing the
OFPP Pamphlet, this rule--
(1) Extracts from the OFPP Pamphlet the relevant and current
information for inclusion in the FAR; and
(2) Provides additional sources of data required to verify the
credit worthiness of a financial entity issuing or confirming an ILC,
as summarized on the Web sites of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (https://www2.fdic.gov/idasp/index.asp) and Securities and
Exchange Commission https://www.sec.gov/answers/nrsro.htm).
Five respondents submitted comments on the proposed rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition
Regulations Council (the Councils) reviewed the comments in the
development of the final rule. A discussion of the comments is provided
as follows:
A. Summary of Significant Changes
This final rule reflects no change to the proposed rule.
B. Analysis of Public Comments
The Regulatory Secretariat received public comments from five
entities in response to the proposed rule. A discussion of these
comments is provided as follows:
1. Support for the Proposed Rule
Comment: Two respondents expressed support for the rule.
Response: The Councils acknowledge the public support for this
rule.
2. Standby Letters of Credit
Comment: Five respondents recommended that the proposed rule
recognize and permit the use of standby letters of credit, in
accordance with International Standby Practices (ISP 98), as described
in International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 590.
Response: The intent of the proposed rule, as stated in the
published preamble is as follows: ``. . . to remove all references to
the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) Pamphlet No. 7, Use of
Irrevocable Letters of Credit (ILC), and also provide updated sources
of data required to verify the credit worthiness of a financial entity
issuing or confirming an ILC.'' As a result, the inclusion of ISP 98 is
considered to be a substantive change and thus beyond the scope of this
case.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA have prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (FRFA) consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601, et seq. The FRFA is summarized as follows:
This action is necessary to remove all references to OFPP
Pamphlet No. 7, Use of Irrevocable Letters of Credit, and provide
updated sources of data required to verify credit worthiness of a
financial entity issuing or confirming an ILC.
The objective of the rule is to provide up-to-date and readily
available information on requirements regarding credit rating for
the financial institution issuing or confirming an ILC.
This will apply to all contracts for services, supplies, or
construction, when a bid guarantee or performance and payment bonds
are required. 40 U.S.C. 3131 requires performance and payment bonds
for any construction contract exceeding $100,000; this was raised
for inflation to $150,000 (see FAR 1.109). Any person required to
furnish a bond has the option to furnish a bond secured by an ILC.
For construction contracts valued at $30,000 to $150,000,
alternative payment protection is required, which may involve an
ILC. Generally, agencies do not require bonds for other than
construction contracts. According to data from the Federal
Procurement Data System, in FY 2011 there were about 58,000 new
awards for construction and construction maintenance, of which
41,000 were awarded to small businesses (about 70 percent). If we
estimate that 10 percent of these awards involve an ILC, then this
rule applies to approximately 4,100 small businesses.
The rule only removes references to OFPP Pamphlet No. 7 and
replaces these references with information relative to sources of
data required to verify an ILC that generally replicates what was in
the pamphlet. There are no new reporting, recordkeeping, or
compliance requirements. The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with any other Federal rules.
No significant alternatives to the rule were identified that
would accomplish the objectives of the rule. We do not foresee any
significant economic impact of the rule on small entities. The basic
requirements remain unchanged; the requirements of the pamphlet are
directly stated, some of the references have been updated, and a Web
site provided for access to a list of Nationally Recognized
Statistical Rating Organizations.
There were no significant issues raised by the public in
response to the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis.
Interested parties may obtain a copy of the FRFA from the
Regulatory Secretariat. The Regulatory Secretariat has submitted a copy
of the FRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any new information collection
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
However, there is a pre-existing requirement at FAR 52.228-14 for
offerors/contractors to provide the contacting officer a credit rating
that indicates the financial institutions have the required credit
rating as of the date
[[Page 61745]]
of issuance of the ILC. OMB Control Number 9000-0045, titled: Bid
Guarantees, Performance and Payment Bonds, and Alternative Payment
Protections, covers the information collection requirements associated
with alternative payment protections (including ILCs) and acceptable
security for bonds (including ILCs). ILCs are seldom offered as
alternative payment protection or security for a bid bond, performance
bond, or payment bond. The negligible burden of providing a credit
rating along with the required ILC is already sufficiently covered by
the approved burden hours in 9000-0045.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1, 28, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: September 30, 2014.
William F. Clark,
Acting Director, Office of Government-Wide Acquisition Policy, Office
of Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-Wide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend 48 CFR parts 1, 28, and 52 as
set forth below:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 1, 28, and 52 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51
U.S.C. 20113.
PART 1--FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM
1.106 [Amended]
0
2. Amend section 1.106, in the list following the introductory text, by
adding in numerical sequence, FAR segment ``52.228-14'' and its
corresponding OMB Control No. ``9000-0045''.
PART 28--BONDS AND INSURANCE
0
3. Amend section 28.204-3 by revising the section heading and
paragraphs (a), (g), and (h) to read as follows:
28.204-3 Irrevocable letter of credit.
(a) Any person required to furnish a bond has the option to furnish
a bond secured by an irrevocable letter of credit (ILC) in an amount
equal to the penal sum required to be secured (see 28.204). A separate
ILC is required for each bond.
* * * * *
(g) Only federally insured financial institutions rated investment
grade shall issue or confirm the ILC. Unless the financial institution
issuing the ILC had letter of credit business of at least $25 million
in the past year, ILCs over $5 million must be confirmed by another
acceptable financial institution that had letter of credit business of
at least $25 million in the past year.
(1) The offeror/contractor is required by paragraph (d) of the
clause at 52.228-14, Irrevocable Letter of Credit, to provide the
contracting officer a credit rating from a recognized commercial rating
service that indicates the financial institution has the required
rating(s) as of the date of issuance of the ILC.
(2) To support the credit rating of the financial institution(s)
issuing or confirming the ILC, the contracting officer shall verify the
following information:
(i) Federal insurance: Each financial institution is federally
insured. Verification of federal insurance is available through the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) institution directory at
the Web site https://www2.fdic.gov/idasp/index.asp.
(ii) Current credit rating. The current credit rating for each
financial institution is investment grade and that the credit rating is
from a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO).
NRSROs can be located at the Web site https://www.sec.gov/answers/nrsro.htm maintained by the SEC.
(3) The rating services listed in the Web site https://www.sec.gov/answers/nrsro.htm use different rating scales (e.g., AAA, AA, A, BBB,
BB, B, CCC, CC, C, and D; or Aaa, Aa, A, Baa, Ba, B, Caa, Ca, and C) to
provide evaluations of institutional credit risk; however, all such
systems specify the range of investment grade ratings (e.g., BBB-AAA or
Baa-Aaa in the examples in this section) and permit evaluation of the
relative risk associated with a specific institution. If the
contracting officer learns that a financial institution's rating has
dropped below investment grade level, the contracting officer shall
give the contractor 30 days to substitute an acceptable ILC or shall
draw on the ILC using the sight draft in paragraph (g) of the clause at
52.228-14.
(h) A copy of the Uniform Customs and Practice (UCP) for
Documentary Credits, 2006 Edition, International Chamber of Commerce
Publication No. 600, is available from: ICC Books USA, 1212 Avenue of
the Americas, 21st Floor, New York, NY 10036; Phone: 212-703-5066; Fax:
212-391-6568; E-Mail: iccbooks@uscib.org; Via the Internet at: https://store.iccbooksusa.net.
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
5. Amend section 52.228-14 by revising the date of the clause and
paragraphs (d), (e)5, and (f)5 to read as follows:
52.228-14 Irrevocable Letter of Credit.
* * * * *
IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT (Nov 2014)
* * * * *
(d)(1) Only federally insured financial institutions rated
investment grade by a commercial rating service shall issue or
confirm the ILC.
(2) Unless the financial institution issuing the ILC had letter
of credit business of at least $25 million in the past year, ILCs
over $5 million must be confirmed by another acceptable financial
institution that had letter of credit business of at least $25
million in the past year.
(3) The Offeror/Contractor shall provide the Contracting Officer
a credit rating that indicates the financial institutions have the
required credit rating as of the date of issuance of the ILC.
(4) The current rating for a financial institution is available
through any of the following rating services registered with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a Nationally
Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO). NRSRO's can be
located at the Web site https://www.sec.gov/answers/nrsro.htm
maintained by the SEC.
(e) * * *
5. This Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and
Practice (UCP) for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of
Commerce Publication No.__-- (Insert version in effect at the time
of ILC issuance, e.g., ``Publication 600, 2006 edition'') and to the
extent not inconsistent therewith, to the laws of __--[State of
confirming financial institution, if any, otherwise State of issuing
financial institution].
* * * * *
(f) * * *
5. This confirmation is subject to the Uniform Customs and
Practice (UCP) for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of
Commerce Publication No.__-- (Insert version in effect at the time
of ILC issuance, e.g., ``Publication 600, 2006 edition'') and to the
extent not inconsistent therewith, to the laws of__--[State of
confirming financial institution].
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-24239 Filed 10-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P