Announcement of Requirements and Registration for the U.S. Tall Wood Building Prize Competition, 61275-61281 [2014-24198]
Download as PDF
61275
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 197
Friday, October 10, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
[OES–2014–0001]
Announcement of Requirements and
Registration for the U.S. Tall Wood
Building Prize Competition
USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 3719.
The U.S. Department of
Agriculture in a cooperative partnership
with the Softwood Lumber Board and
the Binational Softwood Lumber
Council is conducting a prize
competition funding initiative to
support the demonstration of tall wood
buildings in the United States. The U.S.
Tall Wood Building Prize Competition
(the ‘‘Competition’’) is being conducted
to showcase the architectural and
commercial viability of advanced wood
products in tall building construction in
order to support employment
opportunities in rural communities,
maintain the health and resiliency of the
Nation’s forests, and advance
sustainability in the built environment.
Using wood obtained through
sustainable forestry practices in green
building applications promotes a
healthy environment and a strong
economy. The timber industry is an
important job creator and supports
hundreds of local communities, many of
them rural. A recent life cycle analysis
found that harvesting, transporting,
manufacturing, and using wood in
lumber and panel products in building
yields fewer air emissions—including
greenhouse gases—than the resource
extraction, manufacture, and use of
other common building materials.
There are barriers to being the first to
adopt new building materials and
systems, most notably the costs of
analyzing novel design and engineering
alternatives and verifying that these
solutions comply with applicable
code(s). The funds made available for
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Oct 09, 2014
Jkt 235001
the Competition will support costs
associated with pioneering the use of
advanced wood products and systems in
tall buildings and open the door for
more widespread adoption of the
innovative materials.
The objective of the Competition is to
identify one or more proponents with
existing viable projects and capable
design and construction teams willing
to convert their existing project from a
traditionally constructed tall building to
a design and construction approach
using advanced wood building
materials, new composite or hybrid
wood methods, and/or existing proven
alternative solution techniques.
The Competition prize purse will be
awarded to selected proponent(s) to
cover the incremental costs of
converting from traditional construction
to wood construction. The selected
proponent(s) will be the team
demonstrating the best ability to utilize
new scientific data, to develop technical
expertise, and to use incremental
funding to safely design, specify, and
construct a building of a minimum of
eighty feet (80’) in height (not including
a reinforced concrete podium) in the
United States of America that can
showcase the application, practicality,
and sustainability of innovative wood
based structural building solutions in
tall building construction.
DATES:
Competition Submission Period:
October 9, 2014–December 8, 2014.
Evaluation and Judging: December 8,
2014–January 2015.
Verification of Potential Winner(s:)
January 2015.
Announcement of Winner(s) &
Signing of Preliminary Funding
Agreement(s): February 2015.
The Competition Submission Period
begins October 9 at 10:00 a.m. ET and
ends December 8, 2014 at 12:00 a.m. ET.
The Competition Sponsor’s computer,
set to Eastern Time, is the official timekeeping device for this Competition.
Competition dates are subject to
change at the discretion of the
Competition Sponsor. Entries submitted
before or after the Competition
Submission Period will not be reviewed
or considered for award.
Competition Questions, Changes, and
Results
Changes or updates to the
Competition rules will be posted and
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
can be viewed at the Competition Web
site at:
www.tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
Questions about the Competition can
be directed by email to the Competition
Sponsor at: Oscar Faoro, Project
Manager, U.S. Tall Wood Building Prize
Competition, OscarFaoro@
tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
Results of the Competition will be
announced on or about February 2015
on the Competition Web site:
www.tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Competition Partners and Competition
Sponsor
The U.S. Department of Agriculture
(‘‘USDA’’) is the department of the U.S.
Federal government that provides
leadership on food, agriculture, natural
resources, forestry, rural development,
nutrition, and other issues related to
agriculture in America. Web site:
www.usda.gov
The Softwood Lumber Board (‘‘SLB’’)
is an industry funded Check-off Program
established in cooperation with the
USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service
to promote the benefits and uses of
softwood lumber products in outdoor,
residential, and non-residential
construction. Programs supported by the
SLB focus on increasing the demand for
softwood lumber products in the United
States. Web site:
www.softwoodlumberboard.org
The Canadian and U.S. Federal
governments established the Binational
Softwood Lumber Council (‘‘BSLC’’) as
part of the 2006 Softwood Lumber
Agreement ‘‘to promote increased
cooperation between the U.S. and
Canadian softwood lumber industries
and to strengthen and expand the
market for softwood lumber products in
both countries’’. The BSLC is a leading
funder of efforts to increase the use of
softwood lumber products as part of the
shift to green building. Sustainably
harvested softwood lumber products
from North America create jobs in rural
communities, sequester significant
amounts of carbon, and help reduce the
overall environmental footprint of a
home or building. Web site:
www.softwoodlumber.org
Collectively the USDA, SLB, and
BLSC are the ‘‘Competition Partners.’’
The SLB is the ‘‘Competition Sponsor.’’
The Competition Sponsor, in
coordination with the Competition
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
61276
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 197 / Friday, October 10, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Partners, will make all decisions related
to the development, management, and
implementation of the Competition.
The Competition Sponsor and the
winning Project Proponent Team(s) will
enter into funding agreement(s) after the
Competition that will govern the
obligations of the Project Proponent
Team, the process for submitting
Eligible Expenses, and disbursements
from and administration of the Prize
Purse. A sample Funding Agreement
can be found on the Competition Web
site:
www.tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
the Competition is eligible. None of the
Competition Partners’ employees may
participate as members of a Project
Proponent Team.
Non-USDA Federal employees acting
in the capacity of their Federal
employment are not eligible members of
a Project Proponent Team. Non-USDA
Federal employees acting in their
personal capacity should consult with
their respective office of ethics to
determine whether their permission as a
member of a Project Proponent Team is
permissible.
Eligibility Rules for Participating in the
Competition
The competition is open to Project
Proponent Teams consisting of real
estate developers, institutions (e.g.,
universities), and other corporations or
legal organizations (e.g., partnerships or
nonprofit organizations), and their
design and construction team partners.
Each team member must be either:
(1) Individuals that are part of the
Project Proponent Team must be
residents of the 50 United States, the
District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the
U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, and
American Samoa; or
(2) Corporations, institutions, or other
legal entities that are part of the Project
Proponent Team must be organized in
and maintain a primary place of
business in any jurisdiction specified in
(1).
Project Proponent Teams shall
identify a single lead applicant
individual or entity in their Competition
entries (the ‘‘Team Lead’’). The Team
Lead is responsible for providing and
meeting all entry and evaluation
requirements.
All proposed projects must be located
in one of the 50 United States, the
District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the
U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, or American
Samoa.
To be eligible to win the Competition,
Project Proponent Team members must
not be suspended, debarred, or
otherwise excluded from doing business
with the U.S. Federal Government.
A Project Proponent Team shall not
be deemed ineligible because the Project
Proponent Team used Federal facilities
or consulted with Federal employees in
preparing its submission to the
Competition if the facilities and
employees are made available to all
Project Proponent Teams on an
equitable basis.
None of the Competition Partners or
any of their respective affiliates,
subsidiaries, or any other company or
entity involved with the design,
production, execution, or distribution of
Project Proponent Teams may begin
submitting Competition entries at 10:00
a.m. EST on October 9, 2014 to the
Submit page of the Competition Web
site at:
www.tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
Competition entries must be
submitted no later than 12:00 a.m. on
December 7, 2014 to the Submit page of
the Competition Web site at:
www.tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Oct 09, 2014
Jkt 235001
Registration Process for Participants
Formatting
• Entries must be in pdf format.
• Entries must include a table of
contents and be consecutively
paginated.
• Entries must include a cover letter
containing the information set out in
below in the Mandatory Elements
section, subsection A.
• Entries must not exceed 30 pages or
20 megabytes including appendices.
• Entries must be in English.
• All accounting figures contained in
entries must be in U.S. dollars.
Entries submitted late will not be
evaluated or considered for award.
Entries sent to the Competition
Sponsor or Competition Partners in any
manner other than through the Submit
page of the Competition Web site will
not be evaluated or considered for
award.
Entries that do not comply with the
formatting requirements will not be
evaluated or considered for award.
Competition Award(s)
The Prize Purse is a combined pool
from the Competition Partners of $2
million. The Prize Purse may increase,
but will not decrease. Any increases in
the Prize Purse will be posted on the
Competition Web site and published in
the Federal Register. The Prize Purse
will be used to fund one or more
awards; the number of awards made
will depend on the estimated amount of
Eligible Expenses proposed by the
winning Project Proponent Team(s).
Award(s) will be made to the winning
Project Proponent Team(s) to cover
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
incremental costs of transitioning their
building from a traditional structure to
a wood structure, i.e., those costs
incurred only because of the Project
Proponent Team’s innovative use of
wood products in the demonstration
structure.
Incremental costs that may be paid for
using the award(s) from the Prize Purse
are the Eligible Expenses listed below.
The winning Project Proponent Team(s)
will be required to enter into a postCompetition funding agreement
(‘‘Funding Agreement’’) with the
Competition Sponsor, and to submit
incremental costs for approval as
Eligible Expenses prior to receiving
disbursements of funds from the Prize
Purse.
The winning Project Proponent
Team(s) is encouraged to seek
additional sources of funding beyond
the Prize Purse to promote the project’s
transition from a traditional structure to
a wood structure.
All costs incurred in the preparation
of Competition entries are to be borne
by Project Proponent Teams. Entry
preparation costs will not be a Prize
Purse Eligible Expense.
Eligible Expenses
The following types of incremental
costs of transitioning the winning
Project Proponent Team(s) building
from a traditional structure to a wood
structure will be eligible for
reimbursement from the awarded Prize
Purse funds.
Schematic Design, Design Development,
and Construction Drawings
• Architecture.
Æ Concept and design development.
• Engineering.
Æ Incremental preliminary evaluation
of possible structural solutions and
building serviceability related issues.
Æ Incremental design expenses
related to the design of the wood
structure.
Æ Integration of novel solutions when
detailing structural documents for
tendering and construction.
• Fire safety and protection.
Æ Fire and building safety strategies,
related issues, and possible solutions.
• Building enclosure.
Æ Examination of issues and detailing
solutions related to the building’s
exterior facade.
• Mechanical and electrical
interfaces.
Æ Strategies and issue resolutions
related to system integration.
• Secondary impact and preliminary
cost analysis related to use of wood
products, components and systems, and
related construction methodologies.
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 197 / Friday, October 10, 2014 / Notices
Research, Testing, and Other Required
Support by Third Parties
• Research.
Æ Related to acoustic, fire, seismic,
vibration, connections, building envelop
assembly materials, and construction
techniques.
• Modeling and testing.
Æ Costs associated with product,
component, and/or system modeling
and testing.
Building System Code Acceptance,
Final Cost Analysis and Approvals
• Architecture and engineering.
Æ Comprehensive resolution of design
issues.
• Final code review, final cost
analysis, and preparation of documents
and peer review process costs.
• Additional design modeling or
testing requirements.
• Final documents and presentations
to the Local Authority(ies) for building
permit approvals.
• Other project approval costs.
Construction
• Project construction fees associated
with wood construction that would not
otherwise be required.
• Quality control, site inspection, and
site safety costs.
• Weather protection costs related to
protecting materials and constructed
assemblies during the building process.
• Fire protection and site security
costs.
• Risk management related costs.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Related Activities and Other Costs Not
Noted but Directly Attributable to the
Development and Construction of a
Wood Solutions for the Project
• Incremental supervision and trade
training associated with the proposed
wood solution(s).
• Instrumentation during
construction and ongoing monitoring
costs associated with building
performance of critical wood
components or assemblies.
• Extra-ordinary course of
construction insurance premiums and
other extra-ordinary insurance costs
which can be clearly defined.
• Construction site access requested
by the Competition Partners that may
cause the proponent to incur additional
costs; i.e., construction disruption and
additional site safety requirements that
may result from visitor tours or
promotional events.
Mandatory Entry Elements
All Competition entries must include
information addressing all of the
mandatory elements. Any entry that
fails to include information addressing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Oct 09, 2014
Jkt 235001
all of the mandatory elements will not
be considered for award.
A. Each Competition entry must
include a cover letter that (1)
affirmatively represents that the Project
Proponent Team has read and consents
to be governed by the Competition rules
and meets the eligibility requirements,
and (2) clearly lists the following project
and Project Proponent Team
information:
• A brief description of the project,
including location details, proposed
occupancy, proposed building height,
and proposed construction start date;
• The name of the title holder for the
property site being considered for the
project;
• The members of the Project
Proponent Team, the Team Lead, key
contacts and contact details for the
Team Lead, and a brief description of
the relationship amongst and
agreements in place between the Team
Lead and members of the Project
Proponent Team;
• The estimated amount of Eligible
Expenses attributable to transitioning
the project from traditional construction
to wood construction; and
• A clear statement that the Project
Proponent Team commits to have some
wood material sourced from and
manufactured by domestic Rural
Sources.
B. Each Competition entry must
include information addressing the
following elements:
1. Project Specifics and Details
Competition entries must include the
following details about the proposed
project:
• The legal description of the parcel
of land proposed for use as the project
site;
• The name of the title holder for the
parcel of land proposed for use as the
project site;
Æ If the title holder is not a member
of the Project Proponent Team, include
a description of the agreement(s)
entered into with the title holder for use
of the parcel of land proposed for use
as the project site;
• Current and proposed zoning of the
parcel of land proposed for use as the
project site;
• Status of required development
permit(s) for both the project site and
the project itself;
• A project site plan;
• A project rendering; and
• A description of the proposed
accessibility and visibility of the project
on a national architectural scale.
2. Business Case for Project
Competition entries must include
information setting out the Project
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61277
Proponent Team’s business case,
specifically:
• Project Proponent Team’s
experience with building development,
tall building design and construction;
• The proposed project financing
plan;
• A preliminary project budget;
• The estimated amount of Eligible
Expenses attributable to transitioning
the project from traditional construction
to wood construction;
• A reasonably detailed schedule of
when and where Eligible Expenses
would be incurred, outlining how the
Prize Purse will be utilized. The
schedule shall include dates of expected
Prize Purse funding requests;
• A planned timeline of project
development and construction;
• A narrative describing how the
proposed wood solution and project
compares with other more commonly
used structural solutions and buildings
in the market; and
• A summary discussing market
research and estimating the regional
demand for the residential, commercial,
institutional, or industrial spaces
included in the proposed project.
Competition entries also must include
information about the local
authority(ies) having jurisdiction over
the project and/or project site (‘‘Local
Authority(ies)’’):
• Name(s) of and contact information
for the Local Authority(ies) having
jurisdiction over the project and/or
project site;
• A discussion of the previous
experience of the Local Authority(ies)
approving projects using a code
alternate approach;
Æ Note that Project Proponent Team
experience working with the Local
Authority(ies) on a prior successfully
completed code alternate project will be
evaluated more highly than a general
discussion of the code alternate
experience of the Local Authority(ies)
with other developers; and
• Project Proponent Teams must
request from the Local Authority(ies) a
letter (letters) indicating a willingness
on the part of the Local Authority(ies)
to engage with the Project Proponent
Team in a cooperative effort to develop
a code alternate solution for the
proposed project.
Æ If the Local Authority(ies) cannot
provide the requested letter(s) before the
deadline for submission of Competition
entries, the Project Proponent Team
instead may include a written
description detailing the engagement
the Project Proponent Team has had to
date with the Local Authority(ies) and
the nature of the response(s) received
from the Local Authority(ies).
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
61278
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 197 / Friday, October 10, 2014 / Notices
D Note: Competition entries with the
requested letter(s) will be evaluated
more highly than those without.
D Note: The Project Proponent
Team(s) that is evaluated highest will be
required to provide the requested
letter(s) prior to being officially selected
as the Competition winner(s) and
awarded the Prize Purse.
3. Proposed Wood Solution
Competition entries must include
information setting out the Project
Proponent Team’s proposed wood
solution, specifically:
• Proposed structural system;
Æ Detailed information about the
feasibility of the proposed structural
solution being proposed for the project;
e.g., has it been used commonly
elsewhere; has it previously been tested
and applied, or is it experimental and
still requiring research, analysis,
modeling, and testing;
• A preliminary concept of the
proposed structural solution with
information about available research to
support the solution, or the possible
breadth of analysis or testing
requirements needed to validate the
solution; and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4. Sustainability
Competition entries must include
information about the project’s
sustainability, specifically:
• A narrative detailing the project’s
environmental impact or footprint, and
the sustainability elements featured in
the project;
• The narrative must address the
anticipated levels of impact of the
proposed project from a sustainability
and performance perspective including
references to life cycle assessment,
inventory, impact and costing, carbon
sequestration, embodied energy and
expected energy usage.
5. Rural Economic Ties
Competition entries must include
information setting out the project’s ties
to stimulating the rural economy,
specifically:
• An economic narrative describing
the potential of the project and/or wood
materials used in the project to
positively impact the U.S. rural
economy;
• A proposed plan for working with
Competition Sponsor to develop a postproject Tall Wood Building
Demonstration Report, for use within
the building industry, that details
lessons learned and makes
recommendations about building tall
wood structures in the United States;
and
• A statement detailing the Project
Proponent Team’s commitment to have
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Oct 09, 2014
Jkt 235001
some of the wood material used in the
proposed wood solution sourced from
and manufactured by domestic (U.S.)
Rural Sources.
Æ Note: ‘‘Rural Sources’’ are sources
in any areas other than: (1) A city or
town that has a population of greater
than 50,000 inhabitants; and (2) the
urbanized area contiguous and adjacent
to such a city or town, as defined by the
U.S. Bureau of the Census using the
2010 census of the United States.
D The following Web site can be used
as a general non-guaranteed guide to
assist in determining whether or not a
particular area is likely rural: https://
eligibility.sc.egov.usda.gov/eligibility/
welcomeAction.do.
Optional Entry Elements
Competition entries are not required
to include information addressing the
optional elements, but including
information addressing all of the
optional elements will increase chances
of winning.
Entries that include information
addressing some or all of the optional
elements will be evaluated more highly
than entries that do not address any of
the optional elements.
1. Project Specific Details
Competition entries should include
additional detailed project information,
specifically:
• The proposed building enclosure,
and information about how enclosure
issues might be resolved for the specific
location, design, and occupancy of the
proposed project.
2. Business Case for Project
Competition entries should include
additional information setting out the
Project Proponent Team’s business case,
specifically:
• The curricula vitae of the Project
Proponent Team design team member(s)
and/or key consultants; and
• Examples of past projects designed
and completed that are similar to the
proposed project in form and scale.
3. Proposed Wood Solution
Competition entries should include
additional information about the
proposed wood solution, specifically:
• The potential advantages and/or
costs savings of the proposed structural
system and the overall project from a
constructability and competitive
perspective over traditional methods of
building tall structures including but
not limited to; land utilization,
integrated and detailed design;
prefabrication opportunities, and speed
of erection impacting directly or
indirectly other inter-related secondary
or tertiary aspects of construction.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• A fire protection strategy for the
project, and detailed information about
the proposed fire protection systems
and/or fire resistance applications
proposed, and whether the proposed
systems/applications have been
successfully used in wood structures
elsewhere or are experimental.
4. Sustainability
In addition to the information
requested with the mandatory elements,
competition entries should include
information about the project’s
sustainability, specifically:
• Any sustainable timber harvest
practices, certifications, or other land
management information pertinent to
anticipated product use.
5. Rural Economic Ties
Competition entries should include
additional information setting out the
project’s ties to stimulating the rural
economy, specifically:
• Details about where key structural
and architectural wood products and
related materials or complementary
products will be sourced, produced, or
fabricated, and the extent to which these
materials will come from domestic
(U.S.) Rural Sources.
Evaluation, Judging, and Selection of
Winner(s)
The Competition Sponsor will screen
all entries for eligibility and inclusion of
all the mandatory elements. Entries
from Project Proponent Teams that do
not meet the eligibility requirements set
out above in the Eligibility Rules for
Participating in the Competition section
and/or that fail to include one or more
of the mandatory elements set out above
in the Mandatory Entry Elements
section will not be evaluated or
considered for award.
Eligible and complete entries will be
judged by a fair and impartial panel of
individuals (the ‘‘Judging Panel’’) from
the Competition Partners and from
outside organizations with expertise in
tall building design and construction.
Competition entries that include
information about only the mandatory
elements can earn an evaluated base
score of up to 100%. Competition
entries that include information about
some or all of the optional elements can
earn an evaluated base plus bonus score
of up to 125%. The Judging Panel will
evaluate and score each eligible
Competition entry, and will recommend
for award to the Competition Partners
the entry(ies) with the highest combined
base plus bonus score(s). The
Competition Partners will, in their sole
discretion, make award based on
consideration of the Judging Panel’s
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 197 / Friday, October 10, 2014 / Notices
evaluations and recommendations and
the anticipated contribution of the
winning entry(ies) to fostering
transformative change in building
practices through replicable or iconic
demonstration and the anticipated
unique contributions of the winning
entry(ies) to rural economic
opportunity. The Competition Partners
reserve the right to select other than the
highest scoring entry(ies) for award. The
Competition Partners, in their sole
discretion, may identify competition
finalists prior to a final award
determination. The Judging Panel will
evaluate entries based upon the
following mandatory criteria:
1. Project Specifics and Details—
Mandatory Element Criteria—15%
• Viability of the proposed project—
based on site ownership, site
parameters, site zoning, the stage of
design development as presented, and
the stage of the development permit(s)
as described.
• Ability of the project to foster
transformative change in the built
environment—based on the project’s
iconic architecture or engineering, or
high profile accessibility or visibility.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Business Case for Project—Mandatory
Element Criteria—30%
• The Project Proponent Team’s
summary of experience with building
development and tall building design
and construction
• Viability of the Project Proponent
Team’s business case—presentation of
financial metrics, base assumptions,
demand estimation for the project’s
space, market analysis, budgets,
partnership agreements, regional or
national socio-economic impact of the
project, etc.; and based on an estimated
summary of ‘Eligible Expenses’.
• Project Timeline—proposed
schedules with realistic estimated
project completion dates that are nearer
in the future will be evaluated more
highly than proposed schedules with
estimated project completion dates that
are further in the future and/or are
unrealistic.
• Willingness and ability of the Local
Authority(ies) to cooperate with the
Project Proponent Team—based on the
letter(s) from or descriptions of
engagement with the Local
Authority(ies).
D Competition entries with letter(s)
will be evaluated more highly than
entries with only descriptions of the
engagement between the Project
Proponent Team and the Local
Authority(ies)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Oct 09, 2014
Jkt 235001
61279
3. Proposed Wood Solution—Mandatory
Element Criteria—25%
• A description of the fire protection
strategy being proposed and its viability.
• Viability of the proposed wood
structural solution—based on the
system and materials proposed, the
level of detail provided about the
proposed system, the demonstrated
feasibility of the system, and the
practicality of the proposed system and
its potential for repeat use in the
industry.
4. Sustainability—Optional Element
Criteria—Bonus 5%
4. Sustainability—Mandatory Element
Criteria—15%
5. Rural Economic Ties—Optional
Element Criteria—Bonus 5%
• Amount of reduction in
environmental footprint over a similar
building constructed using traditional
materials.
• Amount and types of sustainability
elements featured in the project.
• Feasibility of realizing the
estimated levels of impact of the project
from a sustainability and performance
perspective.
• Competition entries that go beyond
a commitment statement to include
details of how and where in rural
America wood materials will be sourced
will be evaluated more highly than less
detailed entries.
5. Rural Economic Ties—Mandatory
Element Criteria—15%
• Feasibility of realizing positive
impacts to the U.S. rural economy from
the project and/or wood materials used
in the project—based on demonstration
of the project’s potential to be a catalyst
for supporting emerging demand for
new domestic rural manufacturing and
employment opportunities.
• Quality of the plan for development
of a Tall Wood Building Demonstration
Report (A Case Study).
• Creation of direct rural economic
opportunity related to the project—
based on documentation of commitment
to source wood materials from U.S.
Rural Sources.
The Judging Panel will evaluate
entries based upon the following
optional element criteria:
1. Project Specifics and Details—
Optional Element Criteria—Bonus 5%
• A description of the proposed
building enclosure solution and its
viability.
2. Business Case for Project—Optional
Element Criteria—Bonus 5%
• Project Proponent Team’s past
experience with completed design and
construction of projects that are similar
to the proposed project in form and
scale.
3. Proposed Wood Solution—Optional
Element Criteria—Bonus 5%
• A reasonably detailed estimate of
construction costs and savings
comparing the proposed wood solution
to other traditional methods and
materials for the proposed project.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Documentation that links the wood
materials and products to be sourced for
the proposed project to sustainable
timber harvest practices, certifications,
or other sustainable land management
initiatives.
Additional Rules and Conditions
A. General Conditions
By entering the Competition, each
Project Proponent Team guarantees that
its entry complies with all applicable
Federal and state laws and regulations.
Each Project Proponent Team
warrants that its entry is free of viruses,
spyware, malware, or any other
malicious, harmful, or destructive
device. Project Proponent Teams
submitting entries containing any such
device will be held liable and may be
prosecuted to the fullest extent of the
law.
Entries containing any matter which,
in the sole discretion of Competition
Sponsor, is indecent, defamatory, in
obvious bad taste, which demonstrates a
lack of respect for public morals or
conduct, which promotes
discrimination in any form, which
shows unlawful acts being performed,
which is slanderous or libelous, or
which adversely affects the reputations
of Competition Sponsor or any of the
Competition Partners will not be
accepted. If the Competition Sponsor, in
its sole discretion, finds any entry to be
unacceptable then such entry shall be
deemed disqualified and will not be
evaluated or considered for award.
The winning Project Proponent
Team(s) must comply with all
applicable laws and regulations
regarding Prize Purse receipt and
disbursement. The winning Project
Proponent Team(s) also must comply
with all terms and conditions of the
Funding Agreement(s) to be entered into
between the winning Project Proponent
Team(s) and the Competition Sponsor.
Competition Sponsor’s failure to
enforce any term of any applicable rule
or condition shall not constitute a
waiver of that term.
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
61280
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 197 / Friday, October 10, 2014 / Notices
B. Entry Conditions & Release
By entering the Competition, each
Project Proponent Team agrees to: (1)
Comply with and be bound by all
applicable rules and conditions, and the
decisions of the Competition Sponsor
and Competition Partners, which are
binding and final in all matters relating
to this Competition; (2) release and hold
harmless the Competition Sponsor and
the Competition Partners and all their
respective past and present officers,
directors, employees, agents, and
representatives (collectively the
‘‘Released Parties’’) from and against
any and all claims, expenses, and
liability arising out of or relating to the
Project Proponent Team’s entry or
participating in the Competition and/or
the Project Proponent Team’s
acceptance, use, or misuse of the Prize
Purse or recognition.
The Released Parties are not
responsible for: (1) Any incorrect or
inaccurate information, whether caused
by Project Proponent Teams, printing
errors, or by any of the equipment or
programming associated with or used in
the Competition; (2) technical failures of
any kind, including, but not limited to,
malfunctions, interruptions, or
disconnections in phone lines or
network hardware or software; (3)
unauthorized human intervention in
any part of the entry process for the
Competition; (4) technical or human
error that may occur in the
administration of the Competition or the
processing of entries; or (5) any injury
or damage to persons or property that
may be caused, directly or indirectly, in
whole or in part, from Project Proponent
Team’s participation in the Competition
or receipt or use or misuse of the Prize
Purse. If for any reason a Project
Proponent Team’s entry is confirmed to
have been deleted erroneously, lost, or
otherwise destroyed or corrupted,
Project Proponent Team’s sole remedy is
to submit another entry in the
Competition.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. Termination and Disqualification
Competition Sponsor reserves the
authority to cancel, suspend, and/or
modify the Competition, or any part of
it, if any fraud, technical failures, or any
other factor beyond Competition
Sponsor’s reasonable control impairs
the integrity or proper functioning of the
Competition, as determined by
Competition Sponsor in its sole
discretion.
Competition Sponsor reserves the
right to disqualify any Project Proponent
Team it believes to be tampering with
the entry process or the operation of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Oct 09, 2014
Jkt 235001
Competition or to be acting in violation
of any applicable rule or condition.
Any attempt by any person to
undermine the legitimate operation of
the Competition may be a violation of
criminal and civil law, and, should such
an attempt be made, Competition
Sponsor reserves the authority to seek
damages from any such person to the
fullest extent permitted by law.
D. Verification of Potential Winner(s)
All potential competition winners are
subject to verification by competition
sponsor whose decisions are final and
binding in all matters related to the
competition.
Potential winner(s) must continue to
comply with all terms and conditions of
the Competition rules, and winning is
contingent upon fulfilling all
requirements. The potential winner(s)
will be notified by email and/or
telephone. If a potential winner cannot
be contacted, or if the notification is
returned as undeliverable, the potential
winner forfeits. In the event that a
potential winner, or an announced
winner, is found to be ineligible or is
disqualified for any reason, the
Competition Sponsor may make award,
instead, to the next runner up, as
previously determined by the Judging
Panel.
Prior to awarding the Prize Purse,
USDA will verify that the potential
winner(s) is/are not suspended,
debarred, or otherwise excluded from
doing business with the U.S. Federal
Government. Suspended, debarred, or
otherwise excluded parties will not be
eligible to win the Competition.
Prior to being awarded the Prize Purse
the potential winner(s) must:
1. Provide the letter(s) of cooperation
from the Local Authority(ies);
2. Complete a certification of
eligibility attesting to the Project
Proponent Team’s fulfillment of all the
eligibility requirements (the certification
form will be provided to the potential
winner(s) by Competition Sponsor);
3. Enter into a Funding Agreement
with Competition Sponsor. The Funding
Agreement governs the obligations of
the Project Proponent Team, including
the addition of the United States of
America as a named insured on general
liability and umbrella insurance
policies; the process for submitting
Eligible Expenses; and disbursements
from and administration of the Prize
Purse. A sample Funding Agreement
can be found on the Competition Web
site:
www.tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E. Intellectual Property
By entering the Competition, each
Project Proponent Team warrants that it
is the author and/or authorized owner of
its entry, and that the entry is wholly
original with the Project Proponent
Team (or is an improved version of an
existing project plan that the Project
Proponent Team is legally authorized to
enter into the Competition), and that the
submitted entry does not infringe any
copyright, patent, or any other rights of
any third party. Each Project Proponent
Team agrees to hold the Released Parties
harmless for any infringement of
copyright, trademark, patent, and/or
other real or intellectual property right
that may be caused, directly or
indirectly, in whole or in part, from
Project Proponent Team’s participation
in the Competition.
All legal rights in any materials
produced or submitted in entering the
Competition are retained by the Project
Proponent Team and/or the legal holder
of those rights. Entry into the
Competition constitutes express
authorization for Competition Sponsor,
Competition Sponsor’s staff,
Competition Partners’, Competition
Partners’ staff, and the Judging Panel to
review and analyze any and all aspects
of submitted entries, including any
trade secret or proprietary information
contained in or evident from review of
the submitted entries.
Legal rights in materials produced
during design and construction of the
winning project(s) will be negotiated as
part of the Funding Agreement entered
into between Competition Sponsor and
the winning Project Proponent Team(s).
A sample Funding Agreement,
containing draft intellectual property
language, can be found on the
Competition Web site:
www.tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
F. Publicity & Availability of Project for
Demonstration Purposes
By entering the Competition, each
Project Proponent Team consents, as
applicable, to Competition Sponsor’s
and Competition Partners’ use of the
names, likenesses, photographs, voices,
and/or opinions of each member of the
Project Proponent Team both
individually and collectively, and
disclosure of their hometowns and
States for promotional purposes in any
media, worldwide, without further
payment or consideration.
During construction of the winning
project(s) and for a period of three (3)
years after completion, upon advance
notice, the Project Proponent Team shall
provide the Competition Sponsor or
Competition Partners’ representatives,
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 197 / Friday, October 10, 2014 / Notices
and any representatives’ guests,
reasonable access to any premises where
the project takes place (i) to assess the
project’s progress or any element
thereof; and/or (ii) to showcase the
project as a demonstration of the
capabilities of wood structural products
in tall building construction.
G. Privacy & Disclosure Under FOIA
Personal and contact information is
not collected for commercial or
marketing purposes. Information
submitted throughout the Competition
will be used only to communicate with
Project Proponent Teams regarding
entries and/or the Competition.
Project Proponent Teams entries to
the Competition may be subject to
disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act (‘‘FOIA’’). If a Project
Proponent Team believes that all or part
of its Competition entry is protected
from release under FOIA (e.g., if the
information falls under FOIA exemption
#4 for ‘‘trade secrets and commercial or
financial information obtained from a
person [that is] privileged or
confidential’’) the Project Proponent
Team will be responsible for clearly
marking the page(s)/section(s) of
information it believes are protected.
Dated: October 3, 2014.
Doug O’Brien,
Acting Under Secretary, Rural Development.
[FR Doc. 2014–24198 Filed 10–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Information Collection; Locatable
Minerals
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice, request for comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Forest Service is seeking comments
from all interested individuals and
organizations on the extension of a
currently approved information
collection, 36 CFR part 228, subpart A—
Locatable Minerals.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing on or before December 9, 2014
to be assured of consideration.
Comments received after that date will
be considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning this
notice should be addressed to: Forest
Service, Director, Minerals and Geology
Management Staff, Mail Stop 1140, 1400
Independence Ave. SW., Washington,
DC 20250.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Oct 09, 2014
Jkt 235001
Comments also may be submitted via
facsimile to 703–605–1575 or by email
to: jdemaagd@fs.fed.us.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice may be made available to the
public through relevant Web sites and
upon request. For this reason, please do
not include in your comments
information of a confidential nature,
such as sensitive personal information
or proprietary information. If you send
an email comment, your email address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. Please note
that responses to this public comment
request containing any routine notice
about the confidentiality of the
communication will be treated as public
comments that may be made available to
the public notwithstanding the
inclusion of the routine notice.
The public may inspect the draft
supporting statement and/or comments
received at 201 14th Street SW.,
Washington, DC during normal business
hours. Visitors are encouraged to call
ahead to 703–605–4545 to facilitate
entry to the building. The public may
request an electronic copy of the draft
supporting statement and/or any
comments received be sent via return
email. Requests should be emailed to
jdemaagd@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
DeMaagd, Assistant Director, Minerals
and Geology Management, at 303–275–
5473. Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339
twenty-four hours a day, every day of
the year, including holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: 36
CFR Part 228, Subpart A—Locatable
Minerals.
OMB Number: 0596–0022
Expiration Date of Approval: January
31, 2015.
Type of Request: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Abstract: This collection of
information is necessary to ensure that
the environmental impacts associated
with locatable mineral operations on
National Forest System (NFS) lands are
minimized to the extent practicable. The
Forest Service regulations at 36 CFR
228.5 require mining operators, with
some exceptions, to notify the
authorized Forest Service officer of their
intent to conduct a locatable mineral
operation on NFS lands by filing a
Notice of Intent or Plan of Operations.
36 CFR 228.10 requires mining
operators to submit a Cessation of
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61281
Operation when mining operations are
temporarily ceased, other than for
seasonal closure.
There is not a required format for the
information collection, but all
information identified in 36 CFR part
228 must be included. Form FS–2800–
5, Plan of Operations for Mining
Activities on National Forest System
Lands, is available for use by mining
operators to simplify this process. The
information required in a Plan of
Operations, detailed in 36 CFR 228.4(c),
(d), and (e), includes:
1. The name and legal mailing address
of operators (and claimants if they are
not the same) and their lessees, assigns,
or designees.
2. A map or sketch showing
information sufficient to locate:
a. The proposed area of operations on
the ground.
b. Existing and/or proposed roads or
access routes to be used in connection
with the operation as set forth in 36 CFR
228.12 on access.
c. The approximate location and size
of areas where surface resources will be
disturbed.
3. Information sufficient to describe
the:
a. Type of operations proposed and
how they would be conducted.
b. Type and standard of existing and
proposed roads or access routes.
c. Means of transportation used or to
be used as set forth in 36 CFR 228.12.
d. Period during which the proposed
activity will take place.
e. Measures to be taken to meet the
requirements for environmental
protection in 36 CFR 228.8.
A Notice of Intent is required, as
detailed in 36 CFR 228.4(a)(2), to
include information sufficient to
identify the area involved, the nature of
the proposed operation, the route of
access to the area of operations, and the
method of transport. A Cessation of
Operations is required, as detailed in 36
CFR 228.10, to include verification of
intent to maintain structures,
equipment, and other facilities;
expected reopening date; and an
estimate of extended durations of
operations.
These collections of information are
crucial to protecting surface resources,
including plants, animals, and their
habitat, as well as public safety on NFS
lands. The authorized Forest Service
officer will use the collected
information to ensure that the
exploration, development, and
production of mineral resources are
conducted in an environmentally
sensitive manner; that these mineral
operations are integrated with the
planning and management of other
E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM
10OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61275-61281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24198]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 197 / Friday, October 10, 2014 /
Notices
[[Page 61275]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
[OES-2014-0001]
Announcement of Requirements and Registration for the U.S. Tall
Wood Building Prize Competition
AGENCY: USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 3719.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture in a cooperative
partnership with the Softwood Lumber Board and the Binational Softwood
Lumber Council is conducting a prize competition funding initiative to
support the demonstration of tall wood buildings in the United States.
The U.S. Tall Wood Building Prize Competition (the ``Competition'') is
being conducted to showcase the architectural and commercial viability
of advanced wood products in tall building construction in order to
support employment opportunities in rural communities, maintain the
health and resiliency of the Nation's forests, and advance
sustainability in the built environment.
Using wood obtained through sustainable forestry practices in green
building applications promotes a healthy environment and a strong
economy. The timber industry is an important job creator and supports
hundreds of local communities, many of them rural. A recent life cycle
analysis found that harvesting, transporting, manufacturing, and using
wood in lumber and panel products in building yields fewer air
emissions--including greenhouse gases--than the resource extraction,
manufacture, and use of other common building materials.
There are barriers to being the first to adopt new building
materials and systems, most notably the costs of analyzing novel design
and engineering alternatives and verifying that these solutions comply
with applicable code(s). The funds made available for the Competition
will support costs associated with pioneering the use of advanced wood
products and systems in tall buildings and open the door for more
widespread adoption of the innovative materials.
The objective of the Competition is to identify one or more
proponents with existing viable projects and capable design and
construction teams willing to convert their existing project from a
traditionally constructed tall building to a design and construction
approach using advanced wood building materials, new composite or
hybrid wood methods, and/or existing proven alternative solution
techniques.
The Competition prize purse will be awarded to selected
proponent(s) to cover the incremental costs of converting from
traditional construction to wood construction. The selected
proponent(s) will be the team demonstrating the best ability to utilize
new scientific data, to develop technical expertise, and to use
incremental funding to safely design, specify, and construct a building
of a minimum of eighty feet (80') in height (not including a reinforced
concrete podium) in the United States of America that can showcase the
application, practicality, and sustainability of innovative wood based
structural building solutions in tall building construction.
DATES:
Competition Submission Period: October 9, 2014-December 8, 2014.
Evaluation and Judging: December 8, 2014-January 2015.
Verification of Potential Winner(s:) January 2015.
Announcement of Winner(s) & Signing of Preliminary Funding
Agreement(s): February 2015.
The Competition Submission Period begins October 9 at 10:00 a.m. ET
and ends December 8, 2014 at 12:00 a.m. ET. The Competition Sponsor's
computer, set to Eastern Time, is the official time-keeping device for
this Competition.
Competition dates are subject to change at the discretion of the
Competition Sponsor. Entries submitted before or after the Competition
Submission Period will not be reviewed or considered for award.
Competition Questions, Changes, and Results
Changes or updates to the Competition rules will be posted and can
be viewed at the Competition Web site at:
www.tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
Questions about the Competition can be directed by email to the
Competition Sponsor at: Oscar Faoro, Project Manager, U.S. Tall Wood
Building Prize Competition, OscarFaoro@tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
Results of the Competition will be announced on or about February
2015 on the Competition Web site: www.tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Competition Partners and Competition Sponsor
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (``USDA'') is the department of
the U.S. Federal government that provides leadership on food,
agriculture, natural resources, forestry, rural development, nutrition,
and other issues related to agriculture in America. Web site:
www.usda.gov
The Softwood Lumber Board (``SLB'') is an industry funded Check-off
Program established in cooperation with the USDA's Agricultural
Marketing Service to promote the benefits and uses of softwood lumber
products in outdoor, residential, and non-residential construction.
Programs supported by the SLB focus on increasing the demand for
softwood lumber products in the United States. Web site:
www.softwoodlumberboard.org
The Canadian and U.S. Federal governments established the
Binational Softwood Lumber Council (``BSLC'') as part of the 2006
Softwood Lumber Agreement ``to promote increased cooperation between
the U.S. and Canadian softwood lumber industries and to strengthen and
expand the market for softwood lumber products in both countries''. The
BSLC is a leading funder of efforts to increase the use of softwood
lumber products as part of the shift to green building. Sustainably
harvested softwood lumber products from North America create jobs in
rural communities, sequester significant amounts of carbon, and help
reduce the overall environmental footprint of a home or building. Web
site: www.softwoodlumber.org
Collectively the USDA, SLB, and BLSC are the ``Competition
Partners.'' The SLB is the ``Competition Sponsor.'' The Competition
Sponsor, in coordination with the Competition
[[Page 61276]]
Partners, will make all decisions related to the development,
management, and implementation of the Competition.
The Competition Sponsor and the winning Project Proponent Team(s)
will enter into funding agreement(s) after the Competition that will
govern the obligations of the Project Proponent Team, the process for
submitting Eligible Expenses, and disbursements from and administration
of the Prize Purse. A sample Funding Agreement can be found on the
Competition Web site: www.tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
Eligibility Rules for Participating in the Competition
The competition is open to Project Proponent Teams consisting of
real estate developers, institutions (e.g., universities), and other
corporations or legal organizations (e.g., partnerships or nonprofit
organizations), and their design and construction team partners. Each
team member must be either:
(1) Individuals that are part of the Project Proponent Team must be
residents of the 50 United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto
Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa; or
(2) Corporations, institutions, or other legal entities that are
part of the Project Proponent Team must be organized in and maintain a
primary place of business in any jurisdiction specified in (1).
Project Proponent Teams shall identify a single lead applicant
individual or entity in their Competition entries (the ``Team Lead'').
The Team Lead is responsible for providing and meeting all entry and
evaluation requirements.
All proposed projects must be located in one of the 50 United
States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands,
Guam, or American Samoa.
To be eligible to win the Competition, Project Proponent Team
members must not be suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from
doing business with the U.S. Federal Government.
A Project Proponent Team shall not be deemed ineligible because the
Project Proponent Team used Federal facilities or consulted with
Federal employees in preparing its submission to the Competition if the
facilities and employees are made available to all Project Proponent
Teams on an equitable basis.
None of the Competition Partners or any of their respective
affiliates, subsidiaries, or any other company or entity involved with
the design, production, execution, or distribution of the Competition
is eligible. None of the Competition Partners' employees may
participate as members of a Project Proponent Team.
Non-USDA Federal employees acting in the capacity of their Federal
employment are not eligible members of a Project Proponent Team. Non-
USDA Federal employees acting in their personal capacity should consult
with their respective office of ethics to determine whether their
permission as a member of a Project Proponent Team is permissible.
Registration Process for Participants
Project Proponent Teams may begin submitting Competition entries at
10:00 a.m. EST on October 9, 2014 to the Submit page of the Competition
Web site at: www.tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
Competition entries must be submitted no later than 12:00 a.m. on
December 7, 2014 to the Submit page of the Competition Web site at:
www.tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
Formatting
Entries must be in pdf format.
Entries must include a table of contents and be
consecutively paginated.
Entries must include a cover letter containing the
information set out in below in the Mandatory Elements section,
subsection A.
Entries must not exceed 30 pages or 20 megabytes including
appendices.
Entries must be in English.
All accounting figures contained in entries must be in
U.S. dollars.
Entries submitted late will not be evaluated or considered for
award.
Entries sent to the Competition Sponsor or Competition Partners in
any manner other than through the Submit page of the Competition Web
site will not be evaluated or considered for award.
Entries that do not comply with the formatting requirements will
not be evaluated or considered for award.
Competition Award(s)
The Prize Purse is a combined pool from the Competition Partners of
$2 million. The Prize Purse may increase, but will not decrease. Any
increases in the Prize Purse will be posted on the Competition Web site
and published in the Federal Register. The Prize Purse will be used to
fund one or more awards; the number of awards made will depend on the
estimated amount of Eligible Expenses proposed by the winning Project
Proponent Team(s). Award(s) will be made to the winning Project
Proponent Team(s) to cover incremental costs of transitioning their
building from a traditional structure to a wood structure, i.e., those
costs incurred only because of the Project Proponent Team's innovative
use of wood products in the demonstration structure.
Incremental costs that may be paid for using the award(s) from the
Prize Purse are the Eligible Expenses listed below. The winning Project
Proponent Team(s) will be required to enter into a post-Competition
funding agreement (``Funding Agreement'') with the Competition Sponsor,
and to submit incremental costs for approval as Eligible Expenses prior
to receiving disbursements of funds from the Prize Purse.
The winning Project Proponent Team(s) is encouraged to seek
additional sources of funding beyond the Prize Purse to promote the
project's transition from a traditional structure to a wood structure.
All costs incurred in the preparation of Competition entries are to
be borne by Project Proponent Teams. Entry preparation costs will not
be a Prize Purse Eligible Expense.
Eligible Expenses
The following types of incremental costs of transitioning the
winning Project Proponent Team(s) building from a traditional structure
to a wood structure will be eligible for reimbursement from the awarded
Prize Purse funds.
Schematic Design, Design Development, and Construction Drawings
Architecture.
[cir] Concept and design development.
Engineering.
[cir] Incremental preliminary evaluation of possible structural
solutions and building serviceability related issues.
[cir] Incremental design expenses related to the design of the wood
structure.
[cir] Integration of novel solutions when detailing structural
documents for tendering and construction.
Fire safety and protection.
[cir] Fire and building safety strategies, related issues, and
possible solutions.
Building enclosure.
[cir] Examination of issues and detailing solutions related to the
building's exterior facade.
Mechanical and electrical interfaces.
[cir] Strategies and issue resolutions related to system
integration.
Secondary impact and preliminary cost analysis related to
use of wood products, components and systems, and related construction
methodologies.
[[Page 61277]]
Research, Testing, and Other Required Support by Third Parties
Research.
[cir] Related to acoustic, fire, seismic, vibration, connections,
building envelop assembly materials, and construction techniques.
Modeling and testing.
[cir] Costs associated with product, component, and/or system
modeling and testing.
Building System Code Acceptance, Final Cost Analysis and Approvals
Architecture and engineering.
[cir] Comprehensive resolution of design issues.
Final code review, final cost analysis, and preparation of
documents and peer review process costs.
Additional design modeling or testing requirements.
Final documents and presentations to the Local
Authority(ies) for building permit approvals.
Other project approval costs.
Construction
Project construction fees associated with wood
construction that would not otherwise be required.
Quality control, site inspection, and site safety costs.
Weather protection costs related to protecting materials
and constructed assemblies during the building process.
Fire protection and site security costs.
Risk management related costs.
Related Activities and Other Costs Not Noted but Directly Attributable
to the Development and Construction of a Wood Solutions for the Project
Incremental supervision and trade training associated with
the proposed wood solution(s).
Instrumentation during construction and ongoing monitoring
costs associated with building performance of critical wood components
or assemblies.
Extra-ordinary course of construction insurance premiums
and other extra-ordinary insurance costs which can be clearly defined.
Construction site access requested by the Competition
Partners that may cause the proponent to incur additional costs; i.e.,
construction disruption and additional site safety requirements that
may result from visitor tours or promotional events.
Mandatory Entry Elements
All Competition entries must include information addressing all of
the mandatory elements. Any entry that fails to include information
addressing all of the mandatory elements will not be considered for
award.
A. Each Competition entry must include a cover letter that (1)
affirmatively represents that the Project Proponent Team has read and
consents to be governed by the Competition rules and meets the
eligibility requirements, and (2) clearly lists the following project
and Project Proponent Team information:
A brief description of the project, including location
details, proposed occupancy, proposed building height, and proposed
construction start date;
The name of the title holder for the property site being
considered for the project;
The members of the Project Proponent Team, the Team Lead,
key contacts and contact details for the Team Lead, and a brief
description of the relationship amongst and agreements in place between
the Team Lead and members of the Project Proponent Team;
The estimated amount of Eligible Expenses attributable to
transitioning the project from traditional construction to wood
construction; and
A clear statement that the Project Proponent Team commits
to have some wood material sourced from and manufactured by domestic
Rural Sources.
B. Each Competition entry must include information addressing the
following elements:
1. Project Specifics and Details
Competition entries must include the following details about the
proposed project:
The legal description of the parcel of land proposed for
use as the project site;
The name of the title holder for the parcel of land
proposed for use as the project site;
[cir] If the title holder is not a member of the Project Proponent
Team, include a description of the agreement(s) entered into with the
title holder for use of the parcel of land proposed for use as the
project site;
Current and proposed zoning of the parcel of land proposed
for use as the project site;
Status of required development permit(s) for both the
project site and the project itself;
A project site plan;
A project rendering; and
A description of the proposed accessibility and visibility
of the project on a national architectural scale.
2. Business Case for Project
Competition entries must include information setting out the
Project Proponent Team's business case, specifically:
Project Proponent Team's experience with building
development, tall building design and construction;
The proposed project financing plan;
A preliminary project budget;
The estimated amount of Eligible Expenses attributable to
transitioning the project from traditional construction to wood
construction;
A reasonably detailed schedule of when and where Eligible
Expenses would be incurred, outlining how the Prize Purse will be
utilized. The schedule shall include dates of expected Prize Purse
funding requests;
A planned timeline of project development and
construction;
A narrative describing how the proposed wood solution and
project compares with other more commonly used structural solutions and
buildings in the market; and
A summary discussing market research and estimating the
regional demand for the residential, commercial, institutional, or
industrial spaces included in the proposed project.
Competition entries also must include information about the local
authority(ies) having jurisdiction over the project and/or project site
(``Local Authority(ies)''):
Name(s) of and contact information for the Local
Authority(ies) having jurisdiction over the project and/or project
site;
A discussion of the previous experience of the Local
Authority(ies) approving projects using a code alternate approach;
[cir] Note that Project Proponent Team experience working with the
Local Authority(ies) on a prior successfully completed code alternate
project will be evaluated more highly than a general discussion of the
code alternate experience of the Local Authority(ies) with other
developers; and
Project Proponent Teams must request from the Local
Authority(ies) a letter (letters) indicating a willingness on the part
of the Local Authority(ies) to engage with the Project Proponent Team
in a cooperative effort to develop a code alternate solution for the
proposed project.
[cir] If the Local Authority(ies) cannot provide the requested
letter(s) before the deadline for submission of Competition entries,
the Project Proponent Team instead may include a written description
detailing the engagement the Project Proponent Team has had to date
with the Local Authority(ies) and the nature of the response(s)
received from the Local Authority(ies).
[[Page 61278]]
[ssquf] Note: Competition entries with the requested letter(s) will
be evaluated more highly than those without.
[ssquf] Note: The Project Proponent Team(s) that is evaluated
highest will be required to provide the requested letter(s) prior to
being officially selected as the Competition winner(s) and awarded the
Prize Purse.
3. Proposed Wood Solution
Competition entries must include information setting out the
Project Proponent Team's proposed wood solution, specifically:
Proposed structural system;
[cir] Detailed information about the feasibility of the proposed
structural solution being proposed for the project; e.g., has it been
used commonly elsewhere; has it previously been tested and applied, or
is it experimental and still requiring research, analysis, modeling,
and testing;
A preliminary concept of the proposed structural solution
with information about available research to support the solution, or
the possible breadth of analysis or testing requirements needed to
validate the solution; and
4. Sustainability
Competition entries must include information about the project's
sustainability, specifically:
A narrative detailing the project's environmental impact
or footprint, and the sustainability elements featured in the project;
The narrative must address the anticipated levels of
impact of the proposed project from a sustainability and performance
perspective including references to life cycle assessment, inventory,
impact and costing, carbon sequestration, embodied energy and expected
energy usage.
5. Rural Economic Ties
Competition entries must include information setting out the
project's ties to stimulating the rural economy, specifically:
An economic narrative describing the potential of the
project and/or wood materials used in the project to positively impact
the U.S. rural economy;
A proposed plan for working with Competition Sponsor to
develop a post-project Tall Wood Building Demonstration Report, for use
within the building industry, that details lessons learned and makes
recommendations about building tall wood structures in the United
States; and
A statement detailing the Project Proponent Team's
commitment to have some of the wood material used in the proposed wood
solution sourced from and manufactured by domestic (U.S.) Rural
Sources.
[cir] Note: ``Rural Sources'' are sources in any areas other than:
(1) A city or town that has a population of greater than 50,000
inhabitants; and (2) the urbanized area contiguous and adjacent to such
a city or town, as defined by the U.S. Bureau of the Census using the
2010 census of the United States.
[ssquf] The following Web site can be used as a general non-
guaranteed guide to assist in determining whether or not a particular
area is likely rural: https://eligibility.sc.egov.usda.gov/eligibility/welcomeAction.do.
Optional Entry Elements
Competition entries are not required to include information
addressing the optional elements, but including information addressing
all of the optional elements will increase chances of winning.
Entries that include information addressing some or all of the
optional elements will be evaluated more highly than entries that do
not address any of the optional elements.
1. Project Specific Details
Competition entries should include additional detailed project
information, specifically:
The proposed building enclosure, and information about how
enclosure issues might be resolved for the specific location, design,
and occupancy of the proposed project.
2. Business Case for Project
Competition entries should include additional information setting
out the Project Proponent Team's business case, specifically:
The curricula vitae of the Project Proponent Team design
team member(s) and/or key consultants; and
Examples of past projects designed and completed that are
similar to the proposed project in form and scale.
3. Proposed Wood Solution
Competition entries should include additional information about the
proposed wood solution, specifically:
The potential advantages and/or costs savings of the
proposed structural system and the overall project from a
constructability and competitive perspective over traditional methods
of building tall structures including but not limited to; land
utilization, integrated and detailed design; prefabrication
opportunities, and speed of erection impacting directly or indirectly
other inter-related secondary or tertiary aspects of construction.
A fire protection strategy for the project, and detailed
information about the proposed fire protection systems and/or fire
resistance applications proposed, and whether the proposed systems/
applications have been successfully used in wood structures elsewhere
or are experimental.
4. Sustainability
In addition to the information requested with the mandatory
elements, competition entries should include information about the
project's sustainability, specifically:
Any sustainable timber harvest practices, certifications,
or other land management information pertinent to anticipated product
use.
5. Rural Economic Ties
Competition entries should include additional information setting
out the project's ties to stimulating the rural economy, specifically:
Details about where key structural and architectural wood
products and related materials or complementary products will be
sourced, produced, or fabricated, and the extent to which these
materials will come from domestic (U.S.) Rural Sources.
Evaluation, Judging, and Selection of Winner(s)
The Competition Sponsor will screen all entries for eligibility and
inclusion of all the mandatory elements. Entries from Project Proponent
Teams that do not meet the eligibility requirements set out above in
the Eligibility Rules for Participating in the Competition section and/
or that fail to include one or more of the mandatory elements set out
above in the Mandatory Entry Elements section will not be evaluated or
considered for award.
Eligible and complete entries will be judged by a fair and
impartial panel of individuals (the ``Judging Panel'') from the
Competition Partners and from outside organizations with expertise in
tall building design and construction.
Competition entries that include information about only the
mandatory elements can earn an evaluated base score of up to 100%.
Competition entries that include information about some or all of the
optional elements can earn an evaluated base plus bonus score of up to
125%. The Judging Panel will evaluate and score each eligible
Competition entry, and will recommend for award to the Competition
Partners the entry(ies) with the highest combined base plus bonus
score(s). The Competition Partners will, in their sole discretion, make
award based on consideration of the Judging Panel's
[[Page 61279]]
evaluations and recommendations and the anticipated contribution of the
winning entry(ies) to fostering transformative change in building
practices through replicable or iconic demonstration and the
anticipated unique contributions of the winning entry(ies) to rural
economic opportunity. The Competition Partners reserve the right to
select other than the highest scoring entry(ies) for award. The
Competition Partners, in their sole discretion, may identify
competition finalists prior to a final award determination. The Judging
Panel will evaluate entries based upon the following mandatory
criteria:
1. Project Specifics and Details--Mandatory Element Criteria--15%
Viability of the proposed project--based on site
ownership, site parameters, site zoning, the stage of design
development as presented, and the stage of the development permit(s) as
described.
Ability of the project to foster transformative change in
the built environment--based on the project's iconic architecture or
engineering, or high profile accessibility or visibility.
2. Business Case for Project--Mandatory Element Criteria--30%
The Project Proponent Team's summary of experience with
building development and tall building design and construction
Viability of the Project Proponent Team's business case--
presentation of financial metrics, base assumptions, demand estimation
for the project's space, market analysis, budgets, partnership
agreements, regional or national socio-economic impact of the project,
etc.; and based on an estimated summary of `Eligible Expenses'.
Project Timeline--proposed schedules with realistic
estimated project completion dates that are nearer in the future will
be evaluated more highly than proposed schedules with estimated project
completion dates that are further in the future and/or are unrealistic.
Willingness and ability of the Local Authority(ies) to
cooperate with the Project Proponent Team--based on the letter(s) from
or descriptions of engagement with the Local Authority(ies).
[ssquf] Competition entries with letter(s) will be evaluated more
highly than entries with only descriptions of the engagement between
the Project Proponent Team and the Local Authority(ies)
3. Proposed Wood Solution--Mandatory Element Criteria--25%
Viability of the proposed wood structural solution--based
on the system and materials proposed, the level of detail provided
about the proposed system, the demonstrated feasibility of the system,
and the practicality of the proposed system and its potential for
repeat use in the industry.
4. Sustainability--Mandatory Element Criteria--15%
Amount of reduction in environmental footprint over a
similar building constructed using traditional materials.
Amount and types of sustainability elements featured in
the project.
Feasibility of realizing the estimated levels of impact of
the project from a sustainability and performance perspective.
5. Rural Economic Ties--Mandatory Element Criteria--15%
Feasibility of realizing positive impacts to the U.S.
rural economy from the project and/or wood materials used in the
project--based on demonstration of the project's potential to be a
catalyst for supporting emerging demand for new domestic rural
manufacturing and employment opportunities.
Quality of the plan for development of a Tall Wood
Building Demonstration Report (A Case Study).
Creation of direct rural economic opportunity related to
the project--based on documentation of commitment to source wood
materials from U.S. Rural Sources.
The Judging Panel will evaluate entries based upon the following
optional element criteria:
1. Project Specifics and Details--Optional Element Criteria--Bonus 5%
A description of the proposed building enclosure solution
and its viability.
2. Business Case for Project--Optional Element Criteria--Bonus 5%
Project Proponent Team's past experience with completed
design and construction of projects that are similar to the proposed
project in form and scale.
3. Proposed Wood Solution--Optional Element Criteria--Bonus 5%
A reasonably detailed estimate of construction costs and
savings comparing the proposed wood solution to other traditional
methods and materials for the proposed project.
A description of the fire protection strategy being
proposed and its viability.
4. Sustainability--Optional Element Criteria--Bonus 5%
Documentation that links the wood materials and products
to be sourced for the proposed project to sustainable timber harvest
practices, certifications, or other sustainable land management
initiatives.
5. Rural Economic Ties--Optional Element Criteria--Bonus 5%
Competition entries that go beyond a commitment statement
to include details of how and where in rural America wood materials
will be sourced will be evaluated more highly than less detailed
entries.
Additional Rules and Conditions
A. General Conditions
By entering the Competition, each Project Proponent Team guarantees
that its entry complies with all applicable Federal and state laws and
regulations.
Each Project Proponent Team warrants that its entry is free of
viruses, spyware, malware, or any other malicious, harmful, or
destructive device. Project Proponent Teams submitting entries
containing any such device will be held liable and may be prosecuted to
the fullest extent of the law.
Entries containing any matter which, in the sole discretion of
Competition Sponsor, is indecent, defamatory, in obvious bad taste,
which demonstrates a lack of respect for public morals or conduct,
which promotes discrimination in any form, which shows unlawful acts
being performed, which is slanderous or libelous, or which adversely
affects the reputations of Competition Sponsor or any of the
Competition Partners will not be accepted. If the Competition Sponsor,
in its sole discretion, finds any entry to be unacceptable then such
entry shall be deemed disqualified and will not be evaluated or
considered for award.
The winning Project Proponent Team(s) must comply with all
applicable laws and regulations regarding Prize Purse receipt and
disbursement. The winning Project Proponent Team(s) also must comply
with all terms and conditions of the Funding Agreement(s) to be entered
into between the winning Project Proponent Team(s) and the Competition
Sponsor.
Competition Sponsor's failure to enforce any term of any applicable
rule or condition shall not constitute a waiver of that term.
[[Page 61280]]
B. Entry Conditions & Release
By entering the Competition, each Project Proponent Team agrees to:
(1) Comply with and be bound by all applicable rules and conditions,
and the decisions of the Competition Sponsor and Competition Partners,
which are binding and final in all matters relating to this
Competition; (2) release and hold harmless the Competition Sponsor and
the Competition Partners and all their respective past and present
officers, directors, employees, agents, and representatives
(collectively the ``Released Parties'') from and against any and all
claims, expenses, and liability arising out of or relating to the
Project Proponent Team's entry or participating in the Competition and/
or the Project Proponent Team's acceptance, use, or misuse of the Prize
Purse or recognition.
The Released Parties are not responsible for: (1) Any incorrect or
inaccurate information, whether caused by Project Proponent Teams,
printing errors, or by any of the equipment or programming associated
with or used in the Competition; (2) technical failures of any kind,
including, but not limited to, malfunctions, interruptions, or
disconnections in phone lines or network hardware or software; (3)
unauthorized human intervention in any part of the entry process for
the Competition; (4) technical or human error that may occur in the
administration of the Competition or the processing of entries; or (5)
any injury or damage to persons or property that may be caused,
directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, from Project Proponent
Team's participation in the Competition or receipt or use or misuse of
the Prize Purse. If for any reason a Project Proponent Team's entry is
confirmed to have been deleted erroneously, lost, or otherwise
destroyed or corrupted, Project Proponent Team's sole remedy is to
submit another entry in the Competition.
C. Termination and Disqualification
Competition Sponsor reserves the authority to cancel, suspend, and/
or modify the Competition, or any part of it, if any fraud, technical
failures, or any other factor beyond Competition Sponsor's reasonable
control impairs the integrity or proper functioning of the Competition,
as determined by Competition Sponsor in its sole discretion.
Competition Sponsor reserves the right to disqualify any Project
Proponent Team it believes to be tampering with the entry process or
the operation of the Competition or to be acting in violation of any
applicable rule or condition.
Any attempt by any person to undermine the legitimate operation of
the Competition may be a violation of criminal and civil law, and,
should such an attempt be made, Competition Sponsor reserves the
authority to seek damages from any such person to the fullest extent
permitted by law.
D. Verification of Potential Winner(s)
All potential competition winners are subject to verification by
competition sponsor whose decisions are final and binding in all
matters related to the competition.
Potential winner(s) must continue to comply with all terms and
conditions of the Competition rules, and winning is contingent upon
fulfilling all requirements. The potential winner(s) will be notified
by email and/or telephone. If a potential winner cannot be contacted,
or if the notification is returned as undeliverable, the potential
winner forfeits. In the event that a potential winner, or an announced
winner, is found to be ineligible or is disqualified for any reason,
the Competition Sponsor may make award, instead, to the next runner up,
as previously determined by the Judging Panel.
Prior to awarding the Prize Purse, USDA will verify that the
potential winner(s) is/are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise
excluded from doing business with the U.S. Federal Government.
Suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded parties will not be eligible
to win the Competition.
Prior to being awarded the Prize Purse the potential winner(s)
must:
1. Provide the letter(s) of cooperation from the Local
Authority(ies);
2. Complete a certification of eligibility attesting to the Project
Proponent Team's fulfillment of all the eligibility requirements (the
certification form will be provided to the potential winner(s) by
Competition Sponsor);
3. Enter into a Funding Agreement with Competition Sponsor. The
Funding Agreement governs the obligations of the Project Proponent
Team, including the addition of the United States of America as a named
insured on general liability and umbrella insurance policies; the
process for submitting Eligible Expenses; and disbursements from and
administration of the Prize Purse. A sample Funding Agreement can be
found on the Competition Web site: www.tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
E. Intellectual Property
By entering the Competition, each Project Proponent Team warrants
that it is the author and/or authorized owner of its entry, and that
the entry is wholly original with the Project Proponent Team (or is an
improved version of an existing project plan that the Project Proponent
Team is legally authorized to enter into the Competition), and that the
submitted entry does not infringe any copyright, patent, or any other
rights of any third party. Each Project Proponent Team agrees to hold
the Released Parties harmless for any infringement of copyright,
trademark, patent, and/or other real or intellectual property right
that may be caused, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, from
Project Proponent Team's participation in the Competition.
All legal rights in any materials produced or submitted in entering
the Competition are retained by the Project Proponent Team and/or the
legal holder of those rights. Entry into the Competition constitutes
express authorization for Competition Sponsor, Competition Sponsor's
staff, Competition Partners', Competition Partners' staff, and the
Judging Panel to review and analyze any and all aspects of submitted
entries, including any trade secret or proprietary information
contained in or evident from review of the submitted entries.
Legal rights in materials produced during design and construction
of the winning project(s) will be negotiated as part of the Funding
Agreement entered into between Competition Sponsor and the winning
Project Proponent Team(s).
A sample Funding Agreement, containing draft intellectual property
language, can be found on the Competition Web site:
www.tallwoodbuildingcompetition.org.
F. Publicity & Availability of Project for Demonstration Purposes
By entering the Competition, each Project Proponent Team consents,
as applicable, to Competition Sponsor's and Competition Partners' use
of the names, likenesses, photographs, voices, and/or opinions of each
member of the Project Proponent Team both individually and
collectively, and disclosure of their hometowns and States for
promotional purposes in any media, worldwide, without further payment
or consideration.
During construction of the winning project(s) and for a period of
three (3) years after completion, upon advance notice, the Project
Proponent Team shall provide the Competition Sponsor or Competition
Partners' representatives,
[[Page 61281]]
and any representatives' guests, reasonable access to any premises
where the project takes place (i) to assess the project's progress or
any element thereof; and/or (ii) to showcase the project as a
demonstration of the capabilities of wood structural products in tall
building construction.
G. Privacy & Disclosure Under FOIA
Personal and contact information is not collected for commercial or
marketing purposes. Information submitted throughout the Competition
will be used only to communicate with Project Proponent Teams regarding
entries and/or the Competition.
Project Proponent Teams entries to the Competition may be subject
to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (``FOIA''). If a
Project Proponent Team believes that all or part of its Competition
entry is protected from release under FOIA (e.g., if the information
falls under FOIA exemption #4 for ``trade secrets and commercial or
financial information obtained from a person [that is] privileged or
confidential'') the Project Proponent Team will be responsible for
clearly marking the page(s)/section(s) of information it believes are
protected.
Dated: October 3, 2014.
Doug O'Brien,
Acting Under Secretary, Rural Development.
[FR Doc. 2014-24198 Filed 10-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XY-P