Removal of Procedures for Delegation of Administration of Grants and Cooperative Agreements; Withdrawal, 61013 [2014-22693]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 196 / Thursday, October 9, 2014 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2—LOADING CONDITIONS FOR A
MULTIPLE-VOLTAGE UNIT UNDER
TEST—Continued
Load Condition
5.
Load Condition
6.
10% of De-rated Nameplate
Output Current ± 2% (optional).
0%.
(6) Input and output power measurements
shall be conducted in sequence from Loading
Condition 1 to Loading Condition 5, as
indicated in Table 2 of this section. For
Loading Condition 6, place the unit under
test in no-load mode, disconnect any
additional signal connections to the unit
under test, and measure input power.
(B) * * *
(2) If D ≥1, then loading every bus to its
nameplate output current does not exceed
the overall nameplate output power for the
power supply. In this case, each output bus
will simply be loaded to the percentages of
its nameplate output current listed in Table
2 of this section. However, if D <1, it is an
indication that loading each bus to its
nameplate output current will exceed the
overall nameplate output power for the
power supply. In this case, and at each
loading condition, each output bus will be
loaded to the appropriate percentage of its
nameplate output current listed in Table 2,
multiplied by the derating factor D.
(C) Minimum output current requirements.
Depending on their application, some
multiple-voltage power supplies may require
a minimum output current for each output
bus of the power supply for correct
operation. In these cases, ensure that the load
current for each output at Loading Condition
4 in Table 2 of this section is greater than the
minimum output current requirement. Thus,
if the test method’s calculated load current
for a given voltage bus is lower than the
minimum output current requirement, the
minimum output current must be used to
load the bus. This load current shall be
recorded in the test report.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(E) Efficiency calculation and data
recordation. The efficiency of a unit under
test shall be calculated by dividing the
measured active output power of that unit at
a given loading condition by the active AC
input power measured at that loading
condition. The average active-mode
efficiency of the unit shall be calculated by
averaging the efficiency of the unit under test
as calculated at Loading Conditions 1
through 4, unless output cannot be sustained
at one of those loading conditions. In that
case, average-active mode efficiency is
calculated as described in paragraph (a)(i)(D)
of this section. Additionally, an optional
calculation and individual recording of the
efficiency at Loading Condition 5 (specified
in Table 2 in paragraph (b)(i)A)(5) of this
section) may also be performed. Power factor
for Loading Conditions 1 through 5 (as
specified under the same Table 2) may also
be recorded, but these measurements are not
mandatory. The efficiency at each loading
condition and the power factor at each
loading condition shall be individually
recorded.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Oct 08, 2014
Jkt 235001
61013
(F) Power consumption calculation. Power
consumption of the unit under test at
Loading Conditions 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 is the
difference between the active output power
at that Loading Condition and the active AC
input power at that Loading Condition. The
power consumption of Loading Condition 6
(no-load) is equal to the AC active input
power at that Loading Condition.
(ii) Off Mode Measurement—If the
multiple-voltage external power supply unit
under test incorporates any on-off switches,
the unit under test shall be placed in off
mode and its power consumption in off mode
measured and recorded. The measurement of
the off mode energy consumption shall
conform to the requirements specified in
paragraph (b)(i) of this section. The only
loading condition that will be measured for
off mode is ‘‘Loading Condition 6’’ in
paragraph (b)(i)(A), ‘‘Loading conditions and
testing sequence’’, except that all manual onoff switches shall be placed in the off
position for this measurement.
NASA will not proceed to finalize this
action at this time. NASA is currently
preparing guidance and regulations to
implement OMB’s Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards (78 FR 78589, Dec 26,
2013). Because implementation of
OMB’s guidance will necessitate major
changes to NASA’s Grant Handbook,
NASA will make changes to internal
delegation of administration procedures
concurrent with or following the
implementation of OMB’s uniform
requirements.
[FR Doc. 2014–24180 Filed 10–8–14; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
RIN 2700–AE12
Removal of Procedures for Delegation
of Administration of Grants and
Cooperative Agreements; Withdrawal
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
NASA hereby provides notice
of the cancellation of a proposed rule
without further action.
DATES: The proposed rule published in
the Federal Register of November 14,
2013 (78 FR 68376) is withdrawn as of
October 9, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leigh Pomponio, NASA, Office of
Procurement, Contract Management
Division (Suite 2P77), 300 E Street SW.,
Washington DC, 30546–0001; email:
leigh.pomponio@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
A. Background
On November 14, 2013, NASA
published a proposed rule (78 FR
68376) to remove internal procedures
for delegation of grant administration
from the regulation at 14 CFR 1260.70
and 1274.301. The action was published
with an incorrect RIN number (2700–
AE11). On December 26, 2013, a
correction was published (78 FR 78305)
to indicate that the correct RIN number
is 2700–AE12. No public comments
were received on the proposed rule.
Fmt 4702
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
Sfmt 4702
20 CFR Part 620
RIN 1205–AB63
14 CFR Parts 1260 and 1274
Frm 00018
[FR Doc. 2014–22693 Filed 10–8–14; 8:45 am]
Employment and Training
Administration
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
PO 00000
Cynthia Boots,
Alternate Federal Register Liaison.
Federal-State Unemployment
Compensation Program; Middle Class
Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of
2012 Provision on Establishing
Appropriate Occupations for Drug
Testing of Unemployment
Compensation Applicants
Employment and Training
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Employment and
Training Administration (ETA) of the
U.S. Department of Labor (Department)
proposes to establish in regulation, for
State Unemployment Insurance (UI)
program purposes, occupations that
regularly conduct drug testing. These
regulations would implement the
Middle Class Tax Relief and Job
Creation Act of 2012 (the Act)
amendments to the Social Security Act
(SSA), permitting States to enact
legislation that would allow State UI
agencies to conduct drug testing on
unemployment compensation (UC)
applicants for whom suitable work (as
defined under the State law) is only
available in an occupation that regularly
conducts drug testing (as determined
under regulations issued by the
Secretary of Labor (Secretary)). States
may deny UC to an applicant who tests
positive for drug use under these
circumstances. The Secretary is required
under the SSA to issue regulations
determining those occupations that
regularly conduct drug testing.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09OCP1.SGM
09OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 61013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22693]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
14 CFR Parts 1260 and 1274
RIN 2700-AE12
Removal of Procedures for Delegation of Administration of Grants
and Cooperative Agreements; Withdrawal
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NASA hereby provides notice of the cancellation of a proposed
rule without further action.
DATES: The proposed rule published in the Federal Register of November
14, 2013 (78 FR 68376) is withdrawn as of October 9, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leigh Pomponio, NASA, Office of
Procurement, Contract Management Division (Suite 2P77), 300 E Street
SW., Washington DC, 30546-0001; email: leigh.pomponio@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
On November 14, 2013, NASA published a proposed rule (78 FR 68376)
to remove internal procedures for delegation of grant administration
from the regulation at 14 CFR 1260.70 and 1274.301. The action was
published with an incorrect RIN number (2700-AE11). On December 26,
2013, a correction was published (78 FR 78305) to indicate that the
correct RIN number is 2700-AE12. No public comments were received on
the proposed rule. NASA will not proceed to finalize this action at
this time. NASA is currently preparing guidance and regulations to
implement OMB's Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles,
and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (78 FR 78589, Dec 26, 2013).
Because implementation of OMB's guidance will necessitate major changes
to NASA's Grant Handbook, NASA will make changes to internal delegation
of administration procedures concurrent with or following the
implementation of OMB's uniform requirements.
Cynthia Boots,
Alternate Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2014-22693 Filed 10-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P