Significant New Use Rule on Certain Chemical Substances; Technical Correction, 60759-60761 [2014-24027]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 8, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
any RCRA hazardous waste permits or
portions of permits which EPA issued
prior to the effective date of this
authorization until they expire or are
terminated. EPA will not issue any more
permits or new portions of permits for
the provisions listed in the Table above
after the effective date of this
authorization. EPA will continue to
implement and issue permits for HSWA
requirements for which Florida is not
authorized.
J. How does today’s action affect Indian
Country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in Florida?
Florida is not authorized to carry out
its hazardous waste program in Indian
Country within the State, which
includes the Seminole Tribe of Florida
and the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of
Florida. EPA will continue to
implement and administer the RCRA
program in these lands.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with FRONTMATTER
K. What is codification and is EPA
codifying Florida’s hazardous waste
program as authorized in this rule?
Codification is the process of placing
the State’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the State’s authorized
hazardous waste program into the Code
of Federal Regulations. EPA does this by
referencing the authorized State rules in
40 CFR part 272. EPA is not codifying
the authorization of Florida’s changes at
this time. However, EPA reserves the
amendment of 40 CFR part 272, subpart
K, for the authorization of Florida’s
program changes at a later date.
L. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget
has exempted this action from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), and
therefore this action is not subject to
review by OMB. This action authorizes
State requirements for the purpose of
RCRA 3006 and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
State law. Accordingly, I certify that this
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). Because this action authorizes
pre-existing requirements under State
law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
by State law, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). For
the same reason, this action also does
not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Tribal governments, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
action will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely authorizes State requirements as
part of the State RCRA hazardous waste
program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
RCRA. This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), EPA grants a
State’s application for authorization as
long as the State meets the criteria
required by RCRA. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a State
authorization application, to require the
use of any particular voluntary
consensus standard in place of another
standard that otherwise satisfies the
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this rule, EPA has taken the necessary
steps to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR
8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the
takings implications of the rule in
accordance with the ‘‘Attorney
General’s Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under
the executive order. This rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60759
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication in the Federal Register. A
major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective December 8,
2014, unless objections to this
authorization are received.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 3006, and
7004(b), of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and
6974(b).
Dated: August 27, 2014.
Heather McTeer Toney,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2014–24006 Filed 10–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2012–0727; FRL–9917–25]
RIN 2070–AB27
Significant New Use Rule on Certain
Chemical Substances; Technical
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.
AGENCY:
EPA issued final significant
new use rules (SNURs) in the Federal
Register of September 2, 2014 for 36
chemical substances which were the
subject of premanufacture notices
(PMNs). For the chemical substance
identified generically as diisocyanate
terminated polycarbodiimide (PMN P–
04–640), EPA inadvertently omitted the
de minimus exemption from the worker
protection requirements. Also, for the
chemical substance identified
generically as hexanedioic acid,
polymer with .alpha.-hydro-.omega.hydroxypoly[oxy(methyl-1,2ethanediyl)],1,1′-methylenebis[4isocyanatobenzene], dihydroxydialkyl
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08OCR1.SGM
08OCR1
60760
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 8, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
ether and dialkanol ether (PMN P–11–
311) a typographical error in the PMN
number has been identified. The
amendments in this document are being
issued to correct the omission and the
typographical error.
DATES: This technical correction is
effective November 3, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2012–0727, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket),
Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPPT
Docket is (202) 566–0280. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information contact: Jim
Alwood, Chemical Control Division
(7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 564–8974; email address:
alwood.jim@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with FRONTMATTER
I. Does this action apply to me?
The Agency included in the
September 2, 2014 final rule a list of
those who may be potentially affected
by this action.
II. What does this technical correction
do?
EPA issued a final rule in the Federal
Register of September 2, 2014 (79 FR
51899) (FRL–9914–19) for significant
new uses for 36 chemical substances
that were the subject of PMN notices.
EPA omitted the de minimus exemption
of 1.0% from the worker protection
requirements for § 721.10643. EPA also
erroneously identified the chemical
substance in the regulatory text for
§ 721.10653 as being submitted with
PMN P–09–311. The correct number
should be PMN P–11–311. This action
corrects the omission and the
typographical error.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
III. Why is this correction issued as a
final rule?
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and
2625(c).
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B)) provides that, when an
Agency for good cause finds that notice
and public procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest, the Agency may issue a final
rule without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. EPA
has determined that there is good cause
for making this technical correction
final without prior proposal and
opportunity for comment. In Unit V. of
the September 2, 2014 final rule
containing EPA’s response to comments,
EPA stated in the response to comment
10 that it would include a de minimus
exemption of 1.0% from the worker
protection requirements for § 721.10643.
The typographic error of P–09–311 only
appears in the regulatory text for
§ 721.10653. In the proposed rule and
the preamble to the final rule EPA
properly identified the chemical
substance subject to § 721.10653 as
being submitted with P–11–309, thereby
making clear the intention of the
Agency in promulgating the rule. EPA
finds that this constitutes good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
■
IV. Do any of the statutory and
executive order reviews apply to this
action?
No. For a detailed discussion
concerning the statutory and executive
order review, refer to Unit X. of the
September 2, 2014 final rule.
V. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 2, 2014.
Maria J. Doa,
Director, Chemical Control Division, Office
of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
Therefore, 40 CFR part 721 is
amended as follows:
PART 721—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 721
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2. In § 721.10643, revise paragraph
(a)(2)(i) to read as follows:
§ 721.10643 Diisocyanate terminated
polycarbodiimide (generic).
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Protection in the workplace.
Requirements as specified in
§ 721.63(a)(1), (a)(3), (a)(4), (a)(6)(ii), and
(b) (concentration set at 1.0 percent).
When determining which persons are
reasonably likely to be exposed as
required for § 721.63(a)(1) and (4),
engineering control measures (e.g.,
enclosure or confinement of the
operation, general and local ventilation)
or administrative control measures (e.g.,
workplace policies and procedures)
shall be considered and implemented to
prevent or reduce exposure, where
feasible. A National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH)-certified supplied-air
respirator operated in pressure demand
or other positive pressure mode and
equipped with a tight-fitting full
facepiece with an assigned protection
factor (APF) of at least 2,000 meets the
minimum requirements of
§ 721.63(a)(4). As an alternative to the
respiratory requirements listed here, a
manufacturer, importer, or processor
may choose to follow the new chemical
exposure limit (NCEL) provisions listed
in the TSCA section 5(e) consent order
for this substance. The NCEL is 0.05 mg/
m3. Persons whose § 721.30 requests to
use the NCELs approach are approved
by EPA will receive NCELs provisions
comparable to those contained in the
corresponding section 5(e) consent
order.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 721.10653, revise paragraph
(a)(1) to read as follows:
§ 721.10653 Hexanedioic acid, polymer
with .alpha.-hydro-.omega.hydroxypoly[oxy(methyl-1,2ethanediyl)],1,1′-methylenebis[4isocyanatobenzene], dihydroxydialkyl ether
and dialkanol ether (generic).
(a) * * *
(1) The chemical substance identified
generically as hexanedioic acid,
polymer with .alpha.-hydro-.omega.hydroxypoly[oxy(methyl-1,2ethanediyl)],1,1′-methylenebis[4isocyanatobenzene], dihydroxydialkyl
ether and dialkanol ether (PMN P–11–
311) is subject to reporting under this
section for the significant new uses
E:\FR\FM\08OCR1.SGM
08OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 8, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–24027 Filed 10–7–14; 8:45 am]
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with FRONTMATTER
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\08OCR1.SGM
08OCR1
60761
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60759-60761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24027]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2012-0727; FRL-9917-25]
RIN 2070-AB27
Significant New Use Rule on Certain Chemical Substances;
Technical Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA issued final significant new use rules (SNURs) in the
Federal Register of September 2, 2014 for 36 chemical substances which
were the subject of premanufacture notices (PMNs). For the chemical
substance identified generically as diisocyanate terminated
polycarbodiimide (PMN P-04-640), EPA inadvertently omitted the de
minimus exemption from the worker protection requirements. Also, for
the chemical substance identified generically as hexanedioic acid,
polymer with .alpha.-hydro-.omega.- hydroxypoly[oxy(methyl-1,2-
ethanediyl)],1,1'-methylenebis[4-isocyanatobenzene], dihydroxydialkyl
[[Page 60760]]
ether and dialkanol ether (PMN P-11-311) a typographical error in the
PMN number has been identified. The amendments in this document are
being issued to correct the omission and the typographical error.
DATES: This technical correction is effective November 3, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2012-0727, is available at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket), Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202) 566-
0280. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information
about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact: Jim
Alwood, Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-8974; email address: alwood.jim@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Does this action apply to me?
The Agency included in the September 2, 2014 final rule a list of
those who may be potentially affected by this action.
II. What does this technical correction do?
EPA issued a final rule in the Federal Register of September 2,
2014 (79 FR 51899) (FRL-9914-19) for significant new uses for 36
chemical substances that were the subject of PMN notices. EPA omitted
the de minimus exemption of 1.0% from the worker protection
requirements for Sec. 721.10643. EPA also erroneously identified the
chemical substance in the regulatory text for Sec. 721.10653 as being
submitted with PMN P-09-311. The correct number should be PMN P-11-311.
This action corrects the omission and the typographical error.
III. Why is this correction issued as a final rule?
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B)) provides that, when an Agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the Agency may issue a final rule without
providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. EPA has
determined that there is good cause for making this technical
correction final without prior proposal and opportunity for comment. In
Unit V. of the September 2, 2014 final rule containing EPA's response
to comments, EPA stated in the response to comment 10 that it would
include a de minimus exemption of 1.0% from the worker protection
requirements for Sec. 721.10643. The typographic error of P-09-311
only appears in the regulatory text for Sec. 721.10653. In the
proposed rule and the preamble to the final rule EPA properly
identified the chemical substance subject to Sec. 721.10653 as being
submitted with P-11-309, thereby making clear the intention of the
Agency in promulgating the rule. EPA finds that this constitutes good
cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
IV. Do any of the statutory and executive order reviews apply to this
action?
No. For a detailed discussion concerning the statutory and
executive order review, refer to Unit X. of the September 2, 2014 final
rule.
V. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 2, 2014.
Maria J. Doa,
Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics.
Therefore, 40 CFR part 721 is amended as follows:
PART 721--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 721 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and 2625(c).
0
2. In Sec. 721.10643, revise paragraph (a)(2)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. [emsp14]721.10643 Diisocyanate terminated polycarbodiimide
(generic).
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Protection in the workplace. Requirements as specified in Sec.
721.63(a)(1), (a)(3), (a)(4), (a)(6)(ii), and (b) (concentration set at
1.0 percent). When determining which persons are reasonably likely to
be exposed as required for Sec. 721.63(a)(1) and (4), engineering
control measures (e.g., enclosure or confinement of the operation,
general and local ventilation) or administrative control measures
(e.g., workplace policies and procedures) shall be considered and
implemented to prevent or reduce exposure, where feasible. A National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified
supplied-air respirator operated in pressure demand or other positive
pressure mode and equipped with a tight-fitting full facepiece with an
assigned protection factor (APF) of at least 2,000 meets the minimum
requirements of Sec. 721.63(a)(4). As an alternative to the
respiratory requirements listed here, a manufacturer, importer, or
processor may choose to follow the new chemical exposure limit (NCEL)
provisions listed in the TSCA section 5(e) consent order for this
substance. The NCEL is 0.05 mg/m\3\. Persons whose Sec. 721.30
requests to use the NCELs approach are approved by EPA will receive
NCELs provisions comparable to those contained in the corresponding
section 5(e) consent order.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. [emsp14]721.10653, revise paragraph (a)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. [emsp14]721.10653 Hexanedioic acid, polymer with .alpha.-
hydro-.omega.-hydroxypoly[oxy(methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)],1,1'-
methylenebis[4-isocyanatobenzene], dihydroxydialkyl ether and dialkanol
ether (generic).
(a) * * *
(1) The chemical substance identified generically as hexanedioic
acid, polymer with .alpha.-hydro-.omega.-hydroxypoly[oxy(methyl-1,2-
ethanediyl)],1,1'-methylenebis[4-isocyanatobenzene], dihydroxydialkyl
ether and dialkanol ether (PMN P-11-311) is subject to reporting under
this section for the significant new uses
[[Page 60761]]
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-24027 Filed 10-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P