Confirmatory Order in the Matter of Chicago Bridge and Iron Company, 60506-60513 [2014-23939]
Download as PDF
60506
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Notices
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[EA–12–189; EA–13–196; NRC–2014–0218]
Confirmatory Order in the Matter of
Chicago Bridge and Iron Company
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day
of September 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Patricia K. Holahan,
Director, Office of Enforcement.
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Confirmatory order; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing a
confirmatory order to Chicago Bridge
and Iron Company (CB&I) confirming
agreements reached in an Alternative
Dispute Resolution session held on May
30, 2014. As part of the agreement, CB&I
will take a number of actions to
strengthen its safety culture monitoring
program, employee concerns program,
employee training, and
communications. These actions are in
addition to the actions being taken in
response to the September 16, 2013
confirmatory order issued by the NRC.
DATES: Issue Date: September 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2014–0218 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this action by the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2014–0218. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
questions about this Order, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may access publicly
available documents online in the NRC
Library at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search,
select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and
then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
a document is referenced.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Fretz, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
Commission, Washington DC 20555–
0001; Telephone: 301–415–1980; email:
Robert.Fretz@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of
the Order is attached.
Confirmatory Order
(Effective Immediately)
I
Chicago Bridge and Iron (CB&I), is a
large multinational conglomerate
engineering, procurement and
construction company serving various
industries in the United States and
overseas, some of which are regulated
by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC). CB&I’s main office
is located in The Woodlands, Texas.
II
This Confirmatory Order (referenced
as Confirmatory Order or Order) is the
result of agreements reached during two
separate alternative dispute resolution
(ADR) mediation cases. The first case
(EA–12–189) involved two mediation
sessions conducted on June 11, 2013,
and July 29, 2013, and the second case
(EA–13–196) involved one session that
was conducted on May 30, 2014. All
ADR mediation sessions were held in
Rockville Maryland.
Report of Investigation 2–2011–047 (EA–
12–189)
On June 4, 2011, the NRC’s Office of
Investigations (OI) issued its report of
investigation (OI Report No. 2–2011–
047). The investigation related to a
nuclear construction site in South
Carolina, operated by CB&I, formerly
known as Shaw Nuclear Services, Inc.
and hereafter referred to as Shaw. Based
upon evidence developed during its
investigation, the NRC identified an
apparent violation of Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)
52.5, ‘‘Employee protection,’’ involving
a former Shaw employee who was
terminated, in part, for notifying Shaw
and Louisiana Energy Service (at the
direction of the individual’s supervisor,
a Shaw official), of a potential 10 CFR
Part 21 issue regarding selected heats of
rebar that had failed the ASME bend test
and may have been shipped to the
Louisiana Energy Service facility. In
addition, the NRC found Shaw’s Code of
Corporate Conduct to be overly
restrictive and may prevent employees
from raising nuclear safety concerns.
By letter dated October 19, 2012, the
NRC identified to CB&I the apparent
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
violation of 10 CFR 52.5 and offered
CB&I the opportunity to provide a
response in writing, attend a predecisional enforcement conference
(PEC), or to request ADR in which a
neutral mediator with no decisionmaking authority would facilitate
discussions between the NRC and CB&I,
and if possible, assist the NRC and the
parties in reaching an agreement on
resolving the concerns. In a letter dated
January 15, 2013, CB&I provided a
written response to the apparent
violation. In the letter, CB&I denied it
had violated 10 CFR 52.5, contending
that the individual did not engage in a
legally protected activity and was
terminated solely for violating the
company’s Code of Conduct, which
prohibited disclosing company
confidential material to an unauthorized
third party.
Based upon the information gathered
through the NRC’s investigation and the
information provided in the written
response, the NRC issued a Notice of
Violation (Notice) and Proposed
Imposition of Civil Penalties to CB&I on
April 18, 2013. As part of the Notice, the
NRC required CB&I to either reply in
writing to the Notice or to request ADR.
CB&I continued to oppose the violation
and, in lieu of continuing the
enforcement process and eventually
requesting a hearing on the violation,
requested ADR.
On June 11, 2013 and July 29, 2013,
the NRC and CB&I met in Rockville,
Maryland for ADR sessions mediated by
a professional mediator, arranged
through Cornell University’s Institute on
Conflict Resolution. The ADR sessions
resulted in the issuance of a
Confirmatory Order in September 2013.
This Confirmatory Order is issued, in
part, pursuant to the agreement reached
during these ADR mediation sessions.
Report of Investigation 2–2011–036 (EA–
13–196)
On August 7, 2013, OI issued its
report of investigation (OI Report No. 2–
2011–036). The investigation related to
a nuclear modular construction site
located in Lake Charles, Louisiana,
currently operated by CB&I and
formerly known as Shaw Modular
Solutions, Inc. (SMS). Based upon
evidence developed during its
investigation, the NRC identified an
apparent violation of 10 CFR 52.4,
‘‘Deliberate misconduct,’’ involving
former SMS employees who deliberately
subverted welder qualifications
requirements when: (1) A welder took a
welder qualifications test on behalf of a
coworker; (2) the coworker allowed the
welder to take the qualifications tests on
his behalf; and (3) the weld test
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
administrator certified that the coworker
passed his welder qualifications tests
when he knew that the tests were
performed by another person.
In a letter to CB&I dated February 20,
2014, the NRC identified the apparent
violation of 10 CFR 52.4 and offered
CB&I the opportunity to provide a
response in writing, attend a PEC, or to
request ADR in which a neutral
mediator with no decision-making
authority would facilitate discussions
between the NRC and CB&I, and if
possible, assist the NRC and the parties
in reaching an agreement on resolving
the concerns. By letter dated March 17,
2014, CB&I provided a written response
to the apparent violation and requested
a PEC. CB&I later amended its response
and requested ADR in a letter dated
April 22, 2014.
On May 30, 2014, the NRC and CB&I
met in Rockville, Maryland for an ADR
session mediated by a professional
mediator, arranged through Cornell
University’s Institute on Conflict
Resolution. This Confirmatory Order is
issued, in part, pursuant to the
agreement reached during this ADR
mediation session, and supersedes
Confirmatory Order (EA–12–189) issued
on September 16, 2013.
III
The NRC acknowledges that CB&I had
already undertaken actions related to a
chilled work environment at its site in
Lake Charles, Louisiana, formerly
known as SMS. These actions were
agreed to by CB&I in their May 17, 2013,
letter in response to the NRC’s chilling
effect letter dated April 18, 2013. These
actions include:
1. Perform an independent focused
assessment to determine if effective
programmatic controls are in place at
CB&I Lake Charles in the following five
areas: control of special processes;
inspections; personnel training and
qualification; instructions, procedures,
and drawings; and corrective actions.
2. Review the independent
contractor’s 2012 nuclear safety culture
assessment report and initiate corrective
actions, as necessary.
3. Enter the conditions associated
with the Chilling Effect Letter into its
corrective action program (CAP),
characterize it as a significant condition
adverse to quality (SCAQ), and
complete a root cause analysis. CB&I
shall evaluate the potential for similar
issues at other CB&I nuclear facilities.
Pursuant to the September 16, 2013,
Confirmatory Order (EA–12–189), CB&I
also agreed to take additional actions
within CB&I’s business groups where
nuclear related activities take place
including:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
1. Communicating CB&I’s strategy to
improve its nuclear safety culture
recognizing that efforts to date have not
been fully effective. This
communication is to include a brief
summary regarding employee
protection, the NRC’s concerns
expressed in its April 18, 2013, Chilling
Effect Letter regarding CB&I’s Lake
Charles site, and CB&I’s experience,
insights, lessons learned, and corrective
actions both taken and planned. This
communication will be followed by allhands meetings for management to
discuss the importance of the above
written communication; and to allow
employees to provide feedback and ask
questions of management.
2. Ensuring that its nuclear safety
culture and safety conscious work
environment policies, guidance and
related materials are in place, updated,
and consistent with: (1) the NRC’s
March 2011 Safety Culture Policy
Statement and associated traits; and (2)
the NRC’s May 1996 Safety Conscious
Work Environment Policy Statement;
and is informed by: (1) the NRC’s
Regulatory Issue Summary 2005–18,
‘‘Guidance for Establishing and
Maintaining a Safety Conscious Work
Environment’’; and (2) the industry’s
common language initiative (i.e., INPO
12–012, Revision 1, April 2013).
3. Sharing the company’s experience
and insights with respect to improving
nuclear safety culture, including lessons
learned and actions taken in a
presentation to other nuclear vendors in
the industry at an NRC sponsored
vendor conference; and if requested by
the NRC, as a panelist in a breakout
session at the 2014 Regulatory
Information Conference.
4. Hiring a third-party, independent
consultant to assist CB&I to develop
and/or revise its employee protection,
nuclear safety culture and safety
conscious work environment training
for CB&I nuclear employees.
5. Establishing a uniform Executive
Review Board (ERB) process to ensure
independent management review of all
proposed significant adverse actions for
all of its nuclear employees to ensure
these actions comport with applicable
employee protection requirements and
nuclear safety culture traits, and to
assess and mitigate the potential for any
chilling effect.
6. Developing a single Employee
Concerns Program (ECP) for CB&I
nuclear employees.
7. Developing individual performance
appraisal assessment criteria for
individual supervisor’s appraisals to
evaluate if these individuals are meeting
CB&I’s expectations with regards to
employee protection, Nuclear Safety
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60507
Culture and Safety Conscious Work
Environment.
8. Establishing, where applicable, an
active corrective action program (CAP)
trending process to include the ability to
trend root and contributing causes
related to CB&I’s nuclear safety culture
and incorporate trending information in
a process similar to that in NEI 09–07.
9. Developing a process by which
personnel engaged in work associated
with NRC-regulated activities departing
the company are given the opportunity
to participate in an Employee Concerns
Program Exit Interview/Survey to
facilitate identification of nuclear safety
issues, resulting trends and conclusions.
10. Establishing a nuclear safety
culture oversight program, including
one or more committees advised by
external consultants with extensive
nuclear experience.
11. Establishing a CB&I Nuclear Safety
Officer function to address companywide nuclear safety culture and safety
conscious work environment activities.
12. Hiring a third-party, independent
consultant to perform tailored
comprehensive nuclear safety culture
assessments, including site surveys, of
all CB&I nuclear business entities not
already assessed by a licensee and
perform assessments or surveys to
ensure effectiveness of the Nuclear
Safety Culture and Safety Conscious
Work Environment programs. Follow-up
assessments or surveys shall be
conducted every two years for a total of
4 years.
13. Revising its Code of Corporate
Conduct to include a provision stating
that all employees have the right to raise
nuclear safety and quality concerns to
CB&I, the NRC, and Congress, or engage
in any other type of protective activity
without being subject to disciplinary
action or retaliation.
Subject to the satisfactory completion
of the conditions of the September 16,
2013, Confirmatory Order by CB&I, the
NRC exercised its enforcement
discretion and withdrew the Notice of
Violation and Proposed Imposition of
Civil Penalties issued on April 18, 2013.
As a result of the second ADR
mediation session (EA–13–196) held on
May 30, 2014, the NRC acknowledges
that CB&I has taken corrective actions
related to the apparent willful violations
described in the NRC’s letter dated
February 20, 2014. These actions are
documented in a CB&I letter dated June
16, 2014, following the second
mediation session, and include:
1. The issues surrounding the
apparent violations (EA–13–196) were
entered into CB&I’s CAP. The resulting
condition report was classified as a
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
60508
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Notices
SCAQ and a root cause investigation
was performed.
2. CB&I promptly notified the NRC of
the apparent violations and the
potential willful actions by some of its
employees.
3. The employment of the individuals
involved in the apparent violations was
terminated after an internal
investigation determined that their
actions were willful and unacceptable.
4. CB&I verified that no materials
impacted by this issue were shipped
from Lake Charles.
The NRC further acknowledges the
following corrective actions taken and
planned by CB&I to address willful
violations of NRC requirements as
described in the June 16, 2014, letter:
1. Corrective actions to prevent
recurrence of the apparent violations
were identified. This includes training
focused on the meaning of one’s
signature and the significance of
deliberate/willful violations. This
content was added to the new employee
orientation at Lake Charles. A signature
verification process was also
implemented.
2. All-Hands meetings were held to
discuss the significance of deliberate
and/or willful violations.
3. CB&I implemented improvements
to the weld production completion
process, increased Quality Assurance
oversight of weld test controls, and
implemented additional verification
activities by supervision and Quality
Assurance.
4. Extent of cause and extent of
condition reviews were performed and
identified issues were corrected.
5. To support the monitoring and
oversight of deliberate/willful
misconduct at its facilities, CB&I
implemented trend codes in its CAP
related to the ability to trend procedure
related issues/violations. Additionally,
CB&I implemented an Executive
Nuclear Safety Council comprised of
senior facility and business line leaders
and external consultants with extensive
nuclear industry experience. This
Council will assess nuclear safety
performance across all locations and
ensure corrective actions are taken
company wide as needed for common or
significant performance issues (such as
deliberate/willful violations).
Additionally, as a result of the second
ADR mediation case (EA–13–196), an
agreement in principle was reached in
which CB&I agreed to take further
actions within its business groups
where nuclear related activities take
place, including:
1. Adding willful violations and
deliberate misconduct training to the
scope of the training required by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
September 16, 2013, Confirmatory
Order. Training shall note that
employees could be subject to
individual enforcement action and/or
sanctions for deliberate misconduct.
The training shall also include a case
study on willful violations and
deliberate misconduct. The purpose of
this training is also to familiarize CB&I
employees with relevant NRC
regulations (e.g., Appendix B to 10 CFR
Part 50), and how NRC regulations are
incorporated into CB&I policies,
procedures and work practices in order
to ensure that all CB&I employees
understand their roles and
responsibilities regarding compliance
with NRC requirements.
2. Revising CB&I’s safety culture
monitoring program to include focused
questions on willful violations and
deliberate misconduct. CB&I will also
include willful violations and deliberate
misconduct in CB&I’s ECP effectiveness
reports and assessments, and ERB
tracking. CB&I will also revise the ECP
exit interview form to include questions
relating to whether or not the departing
employee is aware of any deliberate/
willful misconduct.
3. Reinforcing CB&I’s expectations
regarding wrongdoing, and compliance
with procedures and NRC requirements
through various forms of
communication at Lake Charles. Site
managers and/or supervisors will
periodically convey the lessons learned
from relevant example wrongdoing
cases during organizational meetings.
On September 22, 2014, CB&I
consented to the NRC issuing this
Confirmatory Order with the
commitments, as described in Section
IV below. CB&I further agreed in its
September 22, 2014, letter that this
Order is to be effective upon issuance
and that it has waived its right to a
hearing. In view of this Confirmatory
Order, consented by CB&I thereto as
evidenced by their signed ‘‘Consent and
Hearing Waiver Form’’ and subject to
the satisfactory completion of the
conditions of this Confirmatory Order
by CB&I, the NRC is exercising its
enforcement discretion and will not
pursue the issuance of a Notice of
Violation and Proposed Imposition of a
Civil Penalty. In addition, the
Confirmatory Order dated September
16, 2013, is hereby rescinded and
replaced with this Confirmatory Order.
The NRC has concluded that its
concerns can be resolved through
effective implementation of CB&I’s
commitments. I find that CB&I’s
commitments as set forth in Section IV
are acceptable and necessary and
conclude that with these commitments
the public health and safety are
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reasonably assured. In view of the
foregoing, I have determined that the
public health and safety require that
CB&I’s commitments be confirmed by
this Order. Based on the above and
CB&I’s consent, this Order is
immediately effective upon issuance.
IV
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections
103, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182, and 186 of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended, and the Commission’s
regulations in 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR
Part 52, it is hereby ordered, effective
immediately, that:
Note: For purposes of this Confirmatory
Order, the term ‘‘employees’’ shall mean
persons employed by CB&I and its
contractors and subcontractors, excluding (a)
short term (less than ninety (90) days)
contractors, and subcontractors, and (b)
suppliers, who are engaged in work
associated with NRC-regulated activities at or
directly related to a CB&I site or project.
A. Communication
1. By no later than November 30,
2013, the CB&I Chief Executive Officer
shall:
(a) Communicate, in writing, to its
current employees CB&I’s strategy to
improve its nuclear safety culture
recognizing that efforts to date have not
been fully effective. This
communication shall include a brief
summary of the subject of this
settlement agreement regarding
employee protection, the NRC’s
concerns expressed in its April 18,
2013, Chilling Effect Letter regarding
CB&I’s Lake Charles site, and CB&I’s
experience, insights, lessons learned,
and corrective actions both taken and
planned.
i. CB&I shall provide a copy of this
communication to the NRC for prior
review.
(b) Require copies of the
communication described above to be
posted for forty-five (45) days in
prominent locations where employees
congregate.
(c) Require all CB&I business units
associated with NRC-regulated activities
to hold all-hands meetings: (1) For
management to discuss the importance
of the above written communication;
and (2) to allow employees to provide
feedback and ask questions of
management related to the
communication listed above.
2. By no later than December 31,
2013, CB&I shall ensure that its nuclear
safety culture and safety conscious work
environment policies, guidance, and
related materials (e.g., brochures,
posters) are in place, updated, and
consistent with: (1) the NRC’s March
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2011 Safety Culture Policy Statement
and associated traits; and (2) the NRC’s
May 1996 Safety Conscious Work
Environment Policy Statement; and is
informed by: (1) the NRC’s Regulatory
Issue Summary 2005–18, ‘‘Guidance for
Establishing and Maintaining a Safety
Conscious Work Environment’’; and (2)
the industry’s common language
initiative (INPO 12–012, Revision 1,
April 2013).
(a) Copies of these materials shall be
provided to the NRC for review at least
two (2) weeks prior to issuance.
(b) CB&I shall maintain and
implement the materials in Section A.2.
(c) CB&I will distribute copies of these
updated policies and brochures to
employees, and inform employees
where all related materials can be
located. These policies and brochures
shall be maintained and provided to all
new employees during initial
orientation.
3. A senior CB&I manager shall share
the company’s experience and insights
with respect to improving nuclear safety
culture, including lessons learned and
actions taken in a presentation:
(a) To other nuclear vendors in the
industry at the next NRC vendor
workshop currently scheduled for June
2014. The presentation shall be
submitted to the NRC for review within
one (1) month of the scheduled
workshop.
(b) If requested by the NRC, as a
panelist in a breakout session at the
2014 Regulatory Information
Conference.
4. For the following eighteen (18)
months after issuance of this
Confirmatory Order, CB&I supervisors at
Lake Charles shall periodically reinforce
expectations regarding safety conscience
work environment and wrongdoing to
their respective work units such that
employees receive a relevant message
on one or more of these topics at least
once per quarter. The periodic
reinforcement may be accomplished as
part of a routine pre-job brief or through
other forms of communication, such as
the use of company-wide posters or site
supervisors conveying company values
and/or lessons learned from relevant
example wrongdoing cases during
organizational meetings.
B. Training
1. By no later than December 31,
2013, CB&I shall hire a third-party,
independent consultant, unrelated to
the proceedings at issue, who is
experienced with NRC employee
protection regulations, Section 211 of
the Energy Reorganization Act, as
amended, and nuclear safety culture
and safety conscious work environment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
policies, to assist CB&I to develop and/
or revise its employee protection,
nuclear safety culture and safety
conscious work environment training
for all CB&I employees.
(a) Training shall include case studies
of discriminatory practices.
(b) Training shall define key terms
included in employee protection
regulations, nuclear safety culture and
safety conscious work environment
policy statements, and be informed by
the industry’s common language
initiative (e.g., nuclear safety issue,
protected activity, adverse action,
nuclear safety culture traits).
(c) Training shall include topics such
as behavioral expectations with regard
to each nuclear safety culture trait.
Training shall also include expectations
for demonstrating support for raising
nuclear safety and quality concerns, and
all available avenues without fear of
retaliation.
(d) Training on CB&I’s Corrective
Action Program will also be
incorporated, and will emphasize the
low threshold for reporting, employee’s
rights, responsibilities and expectations
for raising nuclear safety and quality
issues and initiating corrective action
documentation.
(e) By July 15, 2014, the training shall
include willful violations of NRC
requirements and deliberate
misconduct. Training shall note that
employees could be subject to
individual enforcement action and/or
sanctions for violations of NRC
requirements involving deliberate
misconduct. This training shall also
include a case study on willful
violations of NRC regulations and
deliberate misconduct.
(f) By September 16, 2014, CB&I shall
revise new employee orientation
training to include the subject of willful
violations of NRC regulations and
deliberate misconduct. This training
shall note that employees could be
subject to individual enforcement action
and/or sanctions for violations of NRC
requirements involving deliberate
misconduct. Training shall include an
overview of how NRC regulations
(specifically, at minimum, 10 CFR 52.4,
‘‘Deliberate misconduct,’’ and 10 CFR
Part 50, Appendix B, ‘‘Quality
Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power
Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants’’)
apply to work being performed by CB&I
and shall include a statement that NRC
regulations are incorporated into CB&I
policies, procedures and work practices
to ensure that all CB&I employees
understand their roles and
responsibilities regarding compliance
with NRC requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60509
(g) The training material shall be
made available to the NRC upon
request.
2. Supervisory Training: Initial
training, developed in paragraph B.1
above, for supervisors shall be piloted at
least in part by a team consisting of the
independent consultant and CB&I
employees with expertise in these areas.
Once finalized, this training will be
conducted by the independent
consultant at CB&I’s Lake Charles site
and may be conducted by CB&I
employees trained by the team who
developed and piloted the training at
the other CB&I sites.
(a) The training shall commence no
later than April 1, 2014.
(b) All training must be completed by
December 31, 2014, and shall include a
message from senior management.
(c) Refresher training:
i. Shall be primarily instructor led
and be provided at least every two years
for a period of four (4) years. This
training may be provided by CB&I
training staff.
ii. Thereafter, refresher training may
be computer-based and shall be
provided annually.
(d) Training records shall be retained
consistent with applicable CB&I record
retention policies and be made available
to the NRC upon request.
3. CB&I shall conduct primarily
instructor-led employee protection,
nuclear safety culture, safety conscious
work environment training and
willfulness training twice per year for
any new supervisors hired after the
initial training conducted as described
in paragraphs 1 and 2 above.
4. Employee (Non-Supervisory)
Training: Initial training, developed in
paragraph B.1, for employees shall be
piloted at least in part by a team
consisting of the independent
consultant and CB&I employees with
expertise in these areas. Once finalized,
this training will be conducted by the
independent contractor at CB&I’s Lake
Charles site and may be conducted by
CB&I employees trained by the team
who developed and piloted the training
at other CB&I sites.
(a) All employees training shall
commence within six (6) months
following completion of their
designated line managements’ training.
(b) All training must be completed by
March 31, 2015, and shall include a
message from senior management.
(c) Refresher training may be
computer-based and shall be provided
annually.
(d) Training will be primarily
instructor led for new employees as part
of their orientation program/process.
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
60510
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Notices
(e) Training records shall be retained
consistent with applicable CB&I record
retention policies and be made available
to the NRC upon request.
5. Short-term Employee Training:
Employees employed by CB&I for less
than ninety (90) days will receive a ‘‘one
pager’’ that captures the key elements of
the training developed in Section B.1
above.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. Work Processes
1. By no later than March 31, 2014,
where not already required by the
applicable nuclear facility licensee,
CB&I shall establish and maintain a
uniform Executive Review Board (ERB)
process to ensure independent
management review of all proposed
significant adverse actions (defined as
three or more days off without pay up
to and including termination for cause,
but excluding reductions-in-force and
other ordinary layoffs) for all of its
employees below the level of Vice
President to ensure these actions
comport with applicable employee
protection requirements and nuclear
safety culture traits, and to assess and
mitigate the potential for any chilling
effect. The ERB shall review significant
adverse actions prior to their execution.
(a) The ERB process and procedure(s)
shall be informed by benchmarking at
least 2 organizations in the nuclear
industry with developed processes. The
ERB process shall be included as a topic
in the training developed in Section B.1.
(b) Each ERB shall be comprised of
management personnel, including legal
and/or human resources participation.
The ERB shall be informed of any
known relevant protected activity
engaged in by the subject employee,
including via the Employee Concerns
Program (ECP), but ECP personnel shall
not be a participating member of the
ERB.
(c) Upon request, CB&I shall make
available copies of the ERB process and
procedure, including documentation of
ERB decisions made after the
Confirmatory Order, to the NRC. CB&I
shall maintain documentation of each
ERB decision for a minimum of 5 years.
(d) By no later than December 31,
2014, willful violations of NRC
regulations and deliberate misconduct
will be added to ERB tracking as part of
the safety culture monitoring and
oversight program scope.
2. By no later than March 31, 2014,
CB&I shall develop and maintain a
single Employee Concerns Program
(ECP) for all CB&I employees.
(a) The ECP, including position
descriptions, shall be informed by
benchmarking at least 2 organizations in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
the nuclear industry with developed
processes.
(b) The ECP Functional Manager will
report to the Vice President, Nuclear
Safety for these activities, with day-today reporting and oversight by the
Director of Nuclear Compliance.
(c) ECP personnel shall receive
appropriate training, including
investigative techniques.
(d) By no later than September 30,
2014, ECP effectiveness reports and
assessments shall include all instances
of willful violations of NRC regulations
and deliberate misconduct discovered
by, or otherwise made known to, ECP
personnel.
3. CB&I shall develop and maintain
individual performance appraisal
assessment criteria for individual
supervisor’s appraisals to evaluate if
these individuals are meeting CB&I’s
expectations with regards to employee
protection, Nuclear Safety Culture and
Safety Conscious Work Environment.
Implementation will begin in the
performance appraisal cycle in the year
following completion of the supervisory
training in B.2 above.
4. CB&I shall enhance or establish,
where applicable, an active CAP
trending process to include the ability to
trend root and contributing causes
related to CB&I’s nuclear safety culture
and incorporate trending information in
an NEI 09–07 like process;
implementation will begin in concert
with the implementation of the
activities as described in C.7. By no later
than September 30, 2014, CB&I’s CAP
shall have the ability to trend
procedure-related issues and violations.
Any trends in wrongdoing identified
through ECP and ERB monitoring shall
be entered into the Corrective Action
Program.
5. By no later than March 31, 2014,
CB&I shall develop and implement a
process by which personnel engaged in
work associated with NRC-regulated
activities departing the company are
given the opportunity to participate in
an Employee Concerns Program (ECP)
Exit Interview/Survey to facilitate
identification of nuclear safety issues,
resulting trends and conclusions. These
assessments and any actions resulting
from the exit interviews shall be made
available to the NRC for review upon
request. By no later than September 30,
2014, the ECP exit interview process
shall include content related to willful
violations of NRC regulations and
deliberate misconduct.
6. CB&I shall maintain a toll-free
anonymous reporting service manned
by an independent company for use by
all its employees to raise nuclear safety
and quality concerns.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7. By no later than March 31, 2014,
CB&I shall establish and maintain a
nuclear safety culture oversight
program, including one or more
committees advised by external
consultants with extensive nuclear
experience. This program will provide
input to CB&I facility and site
management as described below.
(a) The Program will assess at least
twice a year the nuclear safety culture
trends in process inputs that could be
early indications of a nuclear safety
culture weakness.
(b) The Program shall be informed by
NEI’s 09–07 guidance and by
benchmarking at least 2 organizations in
the nuclear industry with developed
processes.
(c) The Program shall be directed by
the Vice President Nuclear Safety/
Nuclear Safety Officer who shall oversee
actions as appropriate.
(d) By no later than September 30,
2014, the identification and tracking of
willful violations of NRC regulations
and deliberate misconduct shall be
incorporated into the safety culture
oversight monitoring program.
8. By no later than October 31, 2014,
CB&I shall enter the conditions
associated with the wrongdoing event
described in the NRC’s February 20,
2014, letter into its CAP, characterized
as a significant condition adverse to
quality (SCAQ), and complete a root
cause analysis. CB&I shall evaluate the
potential for similar issues at other CB&I
nuclear facilities and, if appropriate,
initiate additional corrective actions to
address the cause of the wrongdoing.
9. By September 30, 2014, CAP
guidance shall be revised as needed to
ensure future wrongdoing events are
evaluated to determine if they are SCAQ
and require a root cause analysis.
Wrongdoing-related SCAQs will be
reviewed for applicability at other CB&I
nuclear-related facilities.
10. By September 30, 2014, CB&I shall
revise applicable procedures on
procedure use and adherence to
reinforce the requirements of 10 CFR
52.6. Specifically, CB&I shall ensure
that the ‘‘Roles and Responsibilities’’
section clearly articulates: (1) the use
and purpose of an individual’s
signature; (2) that procedural
requirements are expected to be met;
and (3) that complete and accurate
information is to be documented.
Additionally, the ‘‘Roles and
Responsibilities’’ section of the
procedure shall include a warning about
the significance of falsification of
documents in relation to nuclear safety
and violation of NRC requirements.
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
D. Assess and Monitor Nuclear Safety
Culture and Safety Conscious Work
Environment
1. CB&I had previously established a
CB&I Nuclear Safety Officer function to
address company-wide nuclear safety
culture and safety conscious work
environment activities. The Vice
President of Nuclear Safety has been
assigned the duties of the Nuclear Safety
Officer.
2. By no later than March 31, 2014,
CB&I shall hire a third-party,
independent consultant to perform
tailored comprehensive nuclear safety
culture assessments, including site
surveys, of all CB&I nuclear business
entities not already assessed by a
licensee and perform assessments or
surveys within twelve (12) months to
ensure effectiveness of the Nuclear
Safety Culture and Safety Conscious
Work Environment programs.
(a) Follow-up assessments or surveys
shall be conducted every 2 years for a
total of 4 years. These future nuclear
safety culture assessments or surveys
shall be comparable to one another to
allow for effective evaluation of trends.
(b) CB&I shall make available to the
NRC, upon request, the results of the
assessments or surveys, CB&I’s analysis
of the trends, results, and proposed
corrective actions, if any, CB&I will take
to address the results in order to verify
that a healthy nuclear safety culture and
safety conscious work environment
exists at CB&I nuclear business entities.
(c) The results of each assessment or
survey and CB&I’s plan to address the
results shall be communicated to
employees within three (3) months of
receiving the assessment/survey results.
(d) By no later than September 16,
2014, focused questions on willful
violations of NRC regulations and
deliberate misconduct shall be
incorporated into safety culture
assessments.
3. As committed to in CB&I’s May 17,
2013, response to the NRC’s April 18,
2013, Chilling Effect Letter, CB&I shall:
(a) By September 20, 2013, perform an
independent focused assessment to
determine if effective programmatic
controls are in place at CB&I Lake
Charles in the following five areas:
Control of special processes;
inspections; personnel training and
qualification; instructions, procedures,
and drawings; and corrective action.
The assessment team will include, but
will not be limited to, representatives
from Southern Nuclear Operating
Company, South Carolina Electric and
Gas Company, and CB&I Power.
(b) Evaluate the results of the
independent focused assessment and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
take corrective actions as appropriate by
October 31, 2013.
4. As committed to in CB&I’s May 17,
2013, response to the NRC’s April 18,
2013, Chilling Effect Letter, CB&I
reviewed the independent contractor’s
2012 nuclear safety culture assessment
report and initiated corrective actions,
as necessary. The results of this report
were communicated to the Lake Charles
workforce at an all hands meeting on
July 24, 2013.
E. Other
1. As committed to in CB&I’s May 17,
2013, response to the NRC’s April 18,
2013, Chilling Effect Letter, CB&I Lake
Charles has entered the conditions
associated with the Chilling Effect Letter
into its corrective action program,
characterized it as a significant
condition adverse to quality, and
completed a root cause analysis. By no
later than six (6) months after issuance
of the Confirmatory Order, CB&I shall
evaluate the potential for similar issues
at other CB&I nuclear sites.
2. By no later than December 31,
2013, CB&I will revise and maintain its
Code of Corporate Conduct to include a
provision stating that all employees
have the right to raise nuclear safety and
quality concerns to CB&I, the NRC, and
Congress, or engage in any other type of
protected activity without being subject
to disciplinary action or retaliation and
that no other corporate policy may
supersede, limit, or otherwise
discourage an employee’s right to raise
a nuclear safety or quality concern.
(a) By no later than December 31,
2014, CB&I shall revise its Code of
Conduct Policy to incorporate
‘‘Deliberate Misconduct’’ requirements
and its applicability to employees
engaged in NRC-regulated activities.
(b) By no later than March 1, 2015, the
new section must be included, and
explained, in the training conducted in
Section IV.B above.
In consideration for the actions and/
or initiatives that CB&I agrees to
undertake, as outlined above, the NRC
agrees to the following:
1. The NRC agrees to exercise
enforcement discretion and withdraw
the Notice of Violation and Proposed
Imposition of Civil Penalties relating to
employee protection and the Shaw Code
of Conduct (EA–2012–189).
2. The NRC agrees to exercise
enforcement discretion and not pursue
a Notice of Violation and Proposed
Imposition of Civil Penalties relating to
violations of 10 CFR 52.4, ‘‘Deliberate
misconduct,’’ as documented in OI
Report 2–2011–036 (EA–2013–196).
3. This Confirmatory Order does not
affect other potential escalated
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60511
enforcement actions, including ongoing
investigations by the NRC’s Office of
Investigations. However, as part of its
deliberations and consistent with the
philosophy of the Enforcement Policy,
Section 3.3, ‘‘Violations Identified
Because of Previous Enforcement
Action,’’ the NRC will consider
enforcement discretion for violations
with similar root causes (i.e., EA–2012–
189 and EA–2013–196) that occur prior
to or during implementation of the
corrective actions aimed at correcting
that specific condition as specified in
the Confirmatory Order. However, in the
event that CB&I does not demonstrate
that the work environment at its
domestic sites and projects has
improved as a result of the agreed-to
corrective actions, the NRC may
consider escalated enforcement action
beyond the base civil penalty as
provided for in the NRC Enforcement
Policy.
4. Confirmatory Order EA–12–189,
dated September 16, 2013, is rescinded
in its entirety, and is replaced by this
Confirmatory Order.
The Director, OE, may, in writing,
relax or rescind any of the above
conditions upon demonstration by CB&I
of good cause.
V
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202,
CB&I and any other person adversely
affected by this Order may submit an
answer to this Order within 30 days of
issuance. In addition, any other person
adversely affected by this Order may
request a hearing on this Order within
30 days of issuance. Where good cause
is shown, consideration will be given to
extending the time to answer or request
a hearing. A request for extension of
time must be directed to the Director,
Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, and include a
statement of good cause for the
extension.
All documents filed in NRC
adjudicatory proceedings, including a
request for hearing, a petition for leave
to intervene, any motion or other
document filed in the proceeding prior
to the submission of a request for
hearing or petition to intervene, and
documents filed by interested
governmental entities participating
under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in
accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule
(72 FR 49139, August 28, 2007, as
amended by 77 FR 46562, August 3,
2012), codified in pertinent part at 10
CFR Part 2, Subpart C. The E-Filing
process requires participants to submit
and serve all adjudicatory documents
over the internet, or in some cases to
mail copies on electronic storage media.
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
60512
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Notices
Participants may not submit paper
copies of their filings unless they seek
an exemption in accordance with the
procedures described below.
To comply with the procedural
requirements of E-Filing, at least 10
days prior to the filing deadline, the
participant should contact the Office of
the Secretary by email at
hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone
at (301) 415–1677, to request (1) a
digital ID certificate, which allows the
participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign
documents and access the E-Submittal
server for any proceeding in which it is
participating; and (2) advise the
Secretary that the participant will be
submitting a request or petition for
hearing (even in instances in which the
participant, or its counsel or
representative, already holds an NRCissued digital ID certificate). Based upon
this information, the Secretary will
establish an electronic docket for the
hearing in this proceeding if the
Secretary has not already established an
electronic docket.
Information about applying for a
digital ID certificate is available on
NRC’s public Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/
getting-started.html. System
requirements for accessing the ESubmittal server are detailed in NRC’s
‘‘Guidance for Electronic Submission,’’
which is available on the agency’s
public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/
site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants
may attempt to use other software not
listed on the Web site, but should note
that the NRC’s E-Filing system does not
support unlisted software, and the NRC
Meta System Help Desk will not be able
to offer assistance in using unlisted
software.
If a participant is electronically
submitting a document to the NRC in
accordance with the E-Filing rule, the
participant must file the document
using the NRC’s online, web-based
submission form. In order to serve
documents through EIE, users will be
required to install a web browser plugin from the NRC Web site. Further
information on the web-based
submission form, including the
installation of the Web browser plug-in,
is available on the NRC’s public Web
site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html.
Once a participant has obtained a
digital ID certificate and a docket has
been created, the participant can then
submit a request for hearing or petition
for leave to intervene through the EIE.
Submissions should be in Portable
Document Format (PDF) in accordance
with NRC guidance available on the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
NRC public Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. A filing is considered
complete at the time the documents are
submitted through the NRC’s E-Filing
system. To be timely, an electronic
filing must be submitted to the E-Filing
system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time (ET) on the due date. Upon receipt
of a transmission, the E-Filing system
time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an email notice
confirming receipt of the document. The
E-Filing system also distributes an email
notice that provides access to the
document to the NRC Office of the
General Counsel and any others who
have advised the Office of the Secretary
that they wish to participate in the
proceeding, so that the filer need not
serve the documents on those
participants separately. Therefore, any
others who wish to participate in the
proceeding (or their counsel or
representative) must apply for and
receive a digital ID certificate before a
hearing request/petition to intervene is
filed so that they can obtain access to
the document via the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using
the agency’s adjudicatory E-Filing
system may seek assistance by
contacting the NRC Meta System Help
Desk through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link
located on the NRC Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by email at
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at (866) 672–7640. The NRC
Meta System Help Desk is available
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., ET, Monday
through Friday, excluding government
holidays.
Participants who believe that they
have a good cause for not submitting
documents electronically must file an
exemption request, in accordance with
10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper
filing requesting authorization to
continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted
by: (1) first class mail addressed to the
Office of the Secretary of the
Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier,
express mail, or expedited delivery
service to the Office of the Secretary,
Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland, 20852, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff.
Participants filing a document in this
manner are responsible for serving the
document on all other participants.
Filing is considered complete by firstclass mail as of the time of deposit in
the mail, or by courier, express mail, or
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
expedited delivery service upon
depositing the document with the
provider of the service. A presiding
officer, having granted an exemption
request from using E-Filing, may require
a participant or party to use E-Filing if
the presiding officer subsequently
determines that the reason for granting
the exemption from use of E-Filing no
longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in NRC’s
electronic hearing docket, which is
available to the public at https://
ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded
pursuant to an order of the Commission
or the presiding officer. Participants are
requested not to include personal
privacy information, such as social
security numbers, home addresses, or
home phone numbers in their filings,
unless an NRC regulation or other law
requires submission of such
information. With respect to
copyrighted works, except for limited
excerpts that serve the purpose of the
adjudicatory filings and would
constitute a Fair Use application,
participants are requested not to include
copyrighted materials in their
submission.
If a person other than CB&I requests
a hearing, that person shall set forth
with particularity the manner in which
his interest is adversely affected by this
Order and shall address the criteria set
forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d) and (f).
If a hearing is requested by a person
whose interest is adversely affected, the
Commission will issue an Order
designating the time and place of any
hearings. If a hearing is held, the issue
to be considered at such hearing shall be
whether this Order should be sustained.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202(c)(2)(i), any
other person adversely affected by this
Order, may, in addition to demanding a
hearing, at the time the answer is filed
or sooner, move the presiding officer to
set aside the immediate effectiveness of
the Order on the ground that the Order,
including the need for immediate
effectiveness, is not based on adequate
evidence but on mere suspicion,
unfounded allegations, or error. In the
absence of any request for hearing, or
written approval of an extension of time
in which to request a hearing, the
provisions specified in Section IV above
shall be final 30 days from the date of
issuance of this Order without further
order or proceedings. If an extension of
time for requesting a hearing has been
approved, the provisions specified in
Section IV shall be final when the
extension expires if a hearing request
has not been received.
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Notices
An answer or a request for hearing
shall not stay the immediate
effectiveness of this order.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day
of September 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Patricia K. Holahan, Ph.D.,
Acting Director, Office of Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2014–23939 Filed 10–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–305; NRC–2014–0219]
Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact:
Dominion Energy Kewaunee,
Kewaunee Power Station
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of exemptions in response to a
request from Dominion Energy
Kewaunee (DEK, the licensee), which
would permit the licensee to reduce its
emergency planning (EP) activities at
the Kewaunee Power Station. Kewaunee
Power Station has been permanently
shut down and defueled since May of
2013. The licensee is seeking
exemptions that would eliminate the
requirements to maintain offsite
radiological emergency plans and
reduce some of the onsite emergency
planning activities based on the reduced
risks at the permanently shutdown and
defueled reactor. Offsite emergency
planning provisions would still exist
using a comprehensive emergency
management plan process. The NRC
staff is issuing a final Environmental
Assessment (EA) and final Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI)
associated with the proposed
exemptions.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2014–0219 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2014–0219. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this notice (if
that document is available in ADAMS)
is provided the first time that a
document is referenced.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Huffman, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
2046; email: William.Huffman@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
INFORMATION CONTACT
I. Introduction
Kewaunee Power Station (KPS) is a
permanently shutdown and defueled
power reactor in the process of
decommissioning. The KPS is located
on approximately 900 acres in Carlton
(Kewaunee County), Wisconsin, 27
miles southeast of Green Bay Wisconsin.
Dominion Energy Kewaunee is the
holder of Renewed Facility Operating
License No. DPR–43 for KPS. On May 7,
2013, the KPS reactor was permanently
shut down. On May 14, 2014, the KPS
reactor was permanently defueled. As a
permanently shutdown and defueled
facility, and pursuant to § 50.82(a)(2) of
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), KPS is no longer
authorized to operate the reactor or
emplace fuel into the reactor vessel, but
is still authorized to possess and store
irradiated nuclear fuel. Irradiated fuel is
currently stored onsite at KPS in a spent
fuel pool (SFP) and in Independent
Spent Fuel Storage Installation dry
casks. The licensee has requested
exemptions from certain EP
requirements in 10 CFR part 50,
‘‘Domestic Licensing of Production and
Utilization Facilities,’’ for KPS. The
NRC’s regulations concerning EP do not
recognize the reduced risks after a
reactor is permanently shutdown and
defueled. A permanently shutdown
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60513
reactor must continue to maintain the
same EP requirements as an operating
reactor. To establish a level of EP
commensurate with the reduced risks,
DEK requires exemptions from certain
EP regulatory requirements before it can
change its emergency plans.
The NRC is considering issuance of
exemptions to DEK from portions of 10
CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR part 50,
appendix E, which would permit DEK
to modify its emergency plan to
eliminate most licensee required offsite
radiological EP activities at KPS.
Consistent with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC
has reviewed the requirements in 10
CFR 51.20(b) and 10 CFR 51.22(c) and
determined that an environmental
assessment is the appropriate form of
environmental review for the requested
action. Based on the results of the
environmental assessment, which is
provided in Section II below, the NRC
is issuing this final finding of no
significant impact.
II. Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would exempt
DEK from meeting certain requirements
set forth in 10 CFR 50.47, ‘‘Emergency
plans,’’ and appendix E to 10 CFR part
50, ‘‘Emergency Planning and
Preparedness for Production and
Utilization Facilities.’’ More
specifically, DEK requested exemptions
from certain requirements in 10 CFR
50.47(b) regarding onsite and offsite
emergency response plans for nuclear
power reactors; from certain
requirements in 10 CFR 50.47(c)(2) to
establish plume exposure and ingestion
pathway EP zones for nuclear power
reactors; and from certain requirements
in 10 CFR part 50, appendix E, section
IV, which establishes the elements that
make up the content of emergency
plans. The proposed action would result
in the elimination of the requirements
for the licensee to maintain offsite
radiological emergency plans and
reduce some of the onsite emergency
planning activities at KPS based on the
reduced risks at the permanently
shutdown and defueled reactor.
However, requirements for certain
onsite capabilities to communicate and
coordinate with offsite response
authorities will be retained. If necessary,
offsite protective actions could still be
implemented using a comprehensive
emergency management plan (CEMP)
process. A CEMP in this context, also
referred to as an emergency operations
plan (EOP), is addressed in the Federal
Emergency Management Agency’s
(FEMA) Comprehensive Preparedness
Guide 101, ‘‘Developing and
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60506-60513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23939]
[[Page 60506]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[EA-12-189; EA-13-196; NRC-2014-0218]
Confirmatory Order in the Matter of Chicago Bridge and Iron
Company
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Confirmatory order; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing a
confirmatory order to Chicago Bridge and Iron Company (CB&I) confirming
agreements reached in an Alternative Dispute Resolution session held on
May 30, 2014. As part of the agreement, CB&I will take a number of
actions to strengthen its safety culture monitoring program, employee
concerns program, employee training, and communications. These actions
are in addition to the actions being taken in response to the September
16, 2013 confirmatory order issued by the NRC.
DATES: Issue Date: September 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2014-0218 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this action by the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2014-0218. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-
3422; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For questions about this Order,
contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS):
You may access publicly available documents online in the NRC Library
at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search,
select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based
ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's
Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-
4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number
for each document referenced in this document (if that document is
available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is
referenced.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Fretz, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001; Telephone: 301-415-1980; email:
Robert.Fretz@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the Order is attached.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of September 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Patricia K. Holahan,
Director, Office of Enforcement.
Confirmatory Order
(Effective Immediately)
I
Chicago Bridge and Iron (CB&I), is a large multinational
conglomerate engineering, procurement and construction company serving
various industries in the United States and overseas, some of which are
regulated by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). CB&I's main
office is located in The Woodlands, Texas.
II
This Confirmatory Order (referenced as Confirmatory Order or Order)
is the result of agreements reached during two separate alternative
dispute resolution (ADR) mediation cases. The first case (EA-12-189)
involved two mediation sessions conducted on June 11, 2013, and July
29, 2013, and the second case (EA-13-196) involved one session that was
conducted on May 30, 2014. All ADR mediation sessions were held in
Rockville Maryland.
Report of Investigation 2-2011-047 (EA-12-189)
On June 4, 2011, the NRC's Office of Investigations (OI) issued its
report of investigation (OI Report No. 2-2011-047). The investigation
related to a nuclear construction site in South Carolina, operated by
CB&I, formerly known as Shaw Nuclear Services, Inc. and hereafter
referred to as Shaw. Based upon evidence developed during its
investigation, the NRC identified an apparent violation of Title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 52.5, ``Employee protection,''
involving a former Shaw employee who was terminated, in part, for
notifying Shaw and Louisiana Energy Service (at the direction of the
individual's supervisor, a Shaw official), of a potential 10 CFR Part
21 issue regarding selected heats of rebar that had failed the ASME
bend test and may have been shipped to the Louisiana Energy Service
facility. In addition, the NRC found Shaw's Code of Corporate Conduct
to be overly restrictive and may prevent employees from raising nuclear
safety concerns.
By letter dated October 19, 2012, the NRC identified to CB&I the
apparent violation of 10 CFR 52.5 and offered CB&I the opportunity to
provide a response in writing, attend a pre-decisional enforcement
conference (PEC), or to request ADR in which a neutral mediator with no
decision-making authority would facilitate discussions between the NRC
and CB&I, and if possible, assist the NRC and the parties in reaching
an agreement on resolving the concerns. In a letter dated January 15,
2013, CB&I provided a written response to the apparent violation. In
the letter, CB&I denied it had violated 10 CFR 52.5, contending that
the individual did not engage in a legally protected activity and was
terminated solely for violating the company's Code of Conduct, which
prohibited disclosing company confidential material to an unauthorized
third party.
Based upon the information gathered through the NRC's investigation
and the information provided in the written response, the NRC issued a
Notice of Violation (Notice) and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties
to CB&I on April 18, 2013. As part of the Notice, the NRC required CB&I
to either reply in writing to the Notice or to request ADR. CB&I
continued to oppose the violation and, in lieu of continuing the
enforcement process and eventually requesting a hearing on the
violation, requested ADR.
On June 11, 2013 and July 29, 2013, the NRC and CB&I met in
Rockville, Maryland for ADR sessions mediated by a professional
mediator, arranged through Cornell University's Institute on Conflict
Resolution. The ADR sessions resulted in the issuance of a Confirmatory
Order in September 2013. This Confirmatory Order is issued, in part,
pursuant to the agreement reached during these ADR mediation sessions.
Report of Investigation 2-2011-036 (EA-13-196)
On August 7, 2013, OI issued its report of investigation (OI Report
No. 2-2011-036). The investigation related to a nuclear modular
construction site located in Lake Charles, Louisiana, currently
operated by CB&I and formerly known as Shaw Modular Solutions, Inc.
(SMS). Based upon evidence developed during its investigation, the NRC
identified an apparent violation of 10 CFR 52.4, ``Deliberate
misconduct,'' involving former SMS employees who deliberately subverted
welder qualifications requirements when: (1) A welder took a welder
qualifications test on behalf of a coworker; (2) the coworker allowed
the welder to take the qualifications tests on his behalf; and (3) the
weld test
[[Page 60507]]
administrator certified that the coworker passed his welder
qualifications tests when he knew that the tests were performed by
another person.
In a letter to CB&I dated February 20, 2014, the NRC identified the
apparent violation of 10 CFR 52.4 and offered CB&I the opportunity to
provide a response in writing, attend a PEC, or to request ADR in which
a neutral mediator with no decision-making authority would facilitate
discussions between the NRC and CB&I, and if possible, assist the NRC
and the parties in reaching an agreement on resolving the concerns. By
letter dated March 17, 2014, CB&I provided a written response to the
apparent violation and requested a PEC. CB&I later amended its response
and requested ADR in a letter dated April 22, 2014.
On May 30, 2014, the NRC and CB&I met in Rockville, Maryland for an
ADR session mediated by a professional mediator, arranged through
Cornell University's Institute on Conflict Resolution. This
Confirmatory Order is issued, in part, pursuant to the agreement
reached during this ADR mediation session, and supersedes Confirmatory
Order (EA-12-189) issued on September 16, 2013.
III
The NRC acknowledges that CB&I had already undertaken actions
related to a chilled work environment at its site in Lake Charles,
Louisiana, formerly known as SMS. These actions were agreed to by CB&I
in their May 17, 2013, letter in response to the NRC's chilling effect
letter dated April 18, 2013. These actions include:
1. Perform an independent focused assessment to determine if
effective programmatic controls are in place at CB&I Lake Charles in
the following five areas: control of special processes; inspections;
personnel training and qualification; instructions, procedures, and
drawings; and corrective actions.
2. Review the independent contractor's 2012 nuclear safety culture
assessment report and initiate corrective actions, as necessary.
3. Enter the conditions associated with the Chilling Effect Letter
into its corrective action program (CAP), characterize it as a
significant condition adverse to quality (SCAQ), and complete a root
cause analysis. CB&I shall evaluate the potential for similar issues at
other CB&I nuclear facilities.
Pursuant to the September 16, 2013, Confirmatory Order (EA-12-189),
CB&I also agreed to take additional actions within CB&I's business
groups where nuclear related activities take place including:
1. Communicating CB&I's strategy to improve its nuclear safety
culture recognizing that efforts to date have not been fully effective.
This communication is to include a brief summary regarding employee
protection, the NRC's concerns expressed in its April 18, 2013,
Chilling Effect Letter regarding CB&I's Lake Charles site, and CB&I's
experience, insights, lessons learned, and corrective actions both
taken and planned. This communication will be followed by all-hands
meetings for management to discuss the importance of the above written
communication; and to allow employees to provide feedback and ask
questions of management.
2. Ensuring that its nuclear safety culture and safety conscious
work environment policies, guidance and related materials are in place,
updated, and consistent with: (1) the NRC's March 2011 Safety Culture
Policy Statement and associated traits; and (2) the NRC's May 1996
Safety Conscious Work Environment Policy Statement; and is informed by:
(1) the NRC's Regulatory Issue Summary 2005-18, ``Guidance for
Establishing and Maintaining a Safety Conscious Work Environment''; and
(2) the industry's common language initiative (i.e., INPO 12-012,
Revision 1, April 2013).
3. Sharing the company's experience and insights with respect to
improving nuclear safety culture, including lessons learned and actions
taken in a presentation to other nuclear vendors in the industry at an
NRC sponsored vendor conference; and if requested by the NRC, as a
panelist in a breakout session at the 2014 Regulatory Information
Conference.
4. Hiring a third-party, independent consultant to assist CB&I to
develop and/or revise its employee protection, nuclear safety culture
and safety conscious work environment training for CB&I nuclear
employees.
5. Establishing a uniform Executive Review Board (ERB) process to
ensure independent management review of all proposed significant
adverse actions for all of its nuclear employees to ensure these
actions comport with applicable employee protection requirements and
nuclear safety culture traits, and to assess and mitigate the potential
for any chilling effect.
6. Developing a single Employee Concerns Program (ECP) for CB&I
nuclear employees.
7. Developing individual performance appraisal assessment criteria
for individual supervisor's appraisals to evaluate if these individuals
are meeting CB&I's expectations with regards to employee protection,
Nuclear Safety Culture and Safety Conscious Work Environment.
8. Establishing, where applicable, an active corrective action
program (CAP) trending process to include the ability to trend root and
contributing causes related to CB&I's nuclear safety culture and
incorporate trending information in a process similar to that in NEI
09-07.
9. Developing a process by which personnel engaged in work
associated with NRC-regulated activities departing the company are
given the opportunity to participate in an Employee Concerns Program
Exit Interview/Survey to facilitate identification of nuclear safety
issues, resulting trends and conclusions.
10. Establishing a nuclear safety culture oversight program,
including one or more committees advised by external consultants with
extensive nuclear experience.
11. Establishing a CB&I Nuclear Safety Officer function to address
company-wide nuclear safety culture and safety conscious work
environment activities.
12. Hiring a third-party, independent consultant to perform
tailored comprehensive nuclear safety culture assessments, including
site surveys, of all CB&I nuclear business entities not already
assessed by a licensee and perform assessments or surveys to ensure
effectiveness of the Nuclear Safety Culture and Safety Conscious Work
Environment programs. Follow-up assessments or surveys shall be
conducted every two years for a total of 4 years.
13. Revising its Code of Corporate Conduct to include a provision
stating that all employees have the right to raise nuclear safety and
quality concerns to CB&I, the NRC, and Congress, or engage in any other
type of protective activity without being subject to disciplinary
action or retaliation.
Subject to the satisfactory completion of the conditions of the
September 16, 2013, Confirmatory Order by CB&I, the NRC exercised its
enforcement discretion and withdrew the Notice of Violation and
Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties issued on April 18, 2013.
As a result of the second ADR mediation session (EA-13-196) held on
May 30, 2014, the NRC acknowledges that CB&I has taken corrective
actions related to the apparent willful violations described in the
NRC's letter dated February 20, 2014. These actions are documented in a
CB&I letter dated June 16, 2014, following the second mediation
session, and include:
1. The issues surrounding the apparent violations (EA-13-196) were
entered into CB&I's CAP. The resulting condition report was classified
as a
[[Page 60508]]
SCAQ and a root cause investigation was performed.
2. CB&I promptly notified the NRC of the apparent violations and
the potential willful actions by some of its employees.
3. The employment of the individuals involved in the apparent
violations was terminated after an internal investigation determined
that their actions were willful and unacceptable.
4. CB&I verified that no materials impacted by this issue were
shipped from Lake Charles.
The NRC further acknowledges the following corrective actions taken
and planned by CB&I to address willful violations of NRC requirements
as described in the June 16, 2014, letter:
1. Corrective actions to prevent recurrence of the apparent
violations were identified. This includes training focused on the
meaning of one's signature and the significance of deliberate/willful
violations. This content was added to the new employee orientation at
Lake Charles. A signature verification process was also implemented.
2. All-Hands meetings were held to discuss the significance of
deliberate and/or willful violations.
3. CB&I implemented improvements to the weld production completion
process, increased Quality Assurance oversight of weld test controls,
and implemented additional verification activities by supervision and
Quality Assurance.
4. Extent of cause and extent of condition reviews were performed
and identified issues were corrected.
5. To support the monitoring and oversight of deliberate/willful
misconduct at its facilities, CB&I implemented trend codes in its CAP
related to the ability to trend procedure related issues/violations.
Additionally, CB&I implemented an Executive Nuclear Safety Council
comprised of senior facility and business line leaders and external
consultants with extensive nuclear industry experience. This Council
will assess nuclear safety performance across all locations and ensure
corrective actions are taken company wide as needed for common or
significant performance issues (such as deliberate/willful violations).
Additionally, as a result of the second ADR mediation case (EA-13-
196), an agreement in principle was reached in which CB&I agreed to
take further actions within its business groups where nuclear related
activities take place, including:
1. Adding willful violations and deliberate misconduct training to
the scope of the training required by the September 16, 2013,
Confirmatory Order. Training shall note that employees could be subject
to individual enforcement action and/or sanctions for deliberate
misconduct. The training shall also include a case study on willful
violations and deliberate misconduct. The purpose of this training is
also to familiarize CB&I employees with relevant NRC regulations (e.g.,
Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50), and how NRC regulations are incorporated
into CB&I policies, procedures and work practices in order to ensure
that all CB&I employees understand their roles and responsibilities
regarding compliance with NRC requirements.
2. Revising CB&I's safety culture monitoring program to include
focused questions on willful violations and deliberate misconduct. CB&I
will also include willful violations and deliberate misconduct in
CB&I's ECP effectiveness reports and assessments, and ERB tracking.
CB&I will also revise the ECP exit interview form to include questions
relating to whether or not the departing employee is aware of any
deliberate/willful misconduct.
3. Reinforcing CB&I's expectations regarding wrongdoing, and
compliance with procedures and NRC requirements through various forms
of communication at Lake Charles. Site managers and/or supervisors will
periodically convey the lessons learned from relevant example
wrongdoing cases during organizational meetings.
On September 22, 2014, CB&I consented to the NRC issuing this
Confirmatory Order with the commitments, as described in Section IV
below. CB&I further agreed in its September 22, 2014, letter that this
Order is to be effective upon issuance and that it has waived its right
to a hearing. In view of this Confirmatory Order, consented by CB&I
thereto as evidenced by their signed ``Consent and Hearing Waiver
Form'' and subject to the satisfactory completion of the conditions of
this Confirmatory Order by CB&I, the NRC is exercising its enforcement
discretion and will not pursue the issuance of a Notice of Violation
and Proposed Imposition of a Civil Penalty. In addition, the
Confirmatory Order dated September 16, 2013, is hereby rescinded and
replaced with this Confirmatory Order.
The NRC has concluded that its concerns can be resolved through
effective implementation of CB&I's commitments. I find that CB&I's
commitments as set forth in Section IV are acceptable and necessary and
conclude that with these commitments the public health and safety are
reasonably assured. In view of the foregoing, I have determined that
the public health and safety require that CB&I's commitments be
confirmed by this Order. Based on the above and CB&I's consent, this
Order is immediately effective upon issuance.
IV
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 103, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182, and
186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's
regulations in 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR Part 52, it is hereby ordered,
effective immediately, that:
Note: For purposes of this Confirmatory Order, the term
``employees'' shall mean persons employed by CB&I and its
contractors and subcontractors, excluding (a) short term (less than
ninety (90) days) contractors, and subcontractors, and (b)
suppliers, who are engaged in work associated with NRC-regulated
activities at or directly related to a CB&I site or project.
A. Communication
1. By no later than November 30, 2013, the CB&I Chief Executive
Officer shall:
(a) Communicate, in writing, to its current employees CB&I's
strategy to improve its nuclear safety culture recognizing that efforts
to date have not been fully effective. This communication shall include
a brief summary of the subject of this settlement agreement regarding
employee protection, the NRC's concerns expressed in its April 18,
2013, Chilling Effect Letter regarding CB&I's Lake Charles site, and
CB&I's experience, insights, lessons learned, and corrective actions
both taken and planned.
i. CB&I shall provide a copy of this communication to the NRC for
prior review.
(b) Require copies of the communication described above to be
posted for forty-five (45) days in prominent locations where employees
congregate.
(c) Require all CB&I business units associated with NRC-regulated
activities to hold all-hands meetings: (1) For management to discuss
the importance of the above written communication; and (2) to allow
employees to provide feedback and ask questions of management related
to the communication listed above.
2. By no later than December 31, 2013, CB&I shall ensure that its
nuclear safety culture and safety conscious work environment policies,
guidance, and related materials (e.g., brochures, posters) are in
place, updated, and consistent with: (1) the NRC's March
[[Page 60509]]
2011 Safety Culture Policy Statement and associated traits; and (2) the
NRC's May 1996 Safety Conscious Work Environment Policy Statement; and
is informed by: (1) the NRC's Regulatory Issue Summary 2005-18,
``Guidance for Establishing and Maintaining a Safety Conscious Work
Environment''; and (2) the industry's common language initiative (INPO
12-012, Revision 1, April 2013).
(a) Copies of these materials shall be provided to the NRC for
review at least two (2) weeks prior to issuance.
(b) CB&I shall maintain and implement the materials in Section A.2.
(c) CB&I will distribute copies of these updated policies and
brochures to employees, and inform employees where all related
materials can be located. These policies and brochures shall be
maintained and provided to all new employees during initial
orientation.
3. A senior CB&I manager shall share the company's experience and
insights with respect to improving nuclear safety culture, including
lessons learned and actions taken in a presentation:
(a) To other nuclear vendors in the industry at the next NRC vendor
workshop currently scheduled for June 2014. The presentation shall be
submitted to the NRC for review within one (1) month of the scheduled
workshop.
(b) If requested by the NRC, as a panelist in a breakout session at
the 2014 Regulatory Information Conference.
4. For the following eighteen (18) months after issuance of this
Confirmatory Order, CB&I supervisors at Lake Charles shall periodically
reinforce expectations regarding safety conscience work environment and
wrongdoing to their respective work units such that employees receive a
relevant message on one or more of these topics at least once per
quarter. The periodic reinforcement may be accomplished as part of a
routine pre-job brief or through other forms of communication, such as
the use of company-wide posters or site supervisors conveying company
values and/or lessons learned from relevant example wrongdoing cases
during organizational meetings.
B. Training
1. By no later than December 31, 2013, CB&I shall hire a third-
party, independent consultant, unrelated to the proceedings at issue,
who is experienced with NRC employee protection regulations, Section
211 of the Energy Reorganization Act, as amended, and nuclear safety
culture and safety conscious work environment policies, to assist CB&I
to develop and/or revise its employee protection, nuclear safety
culture and safety conscious work environment training for all CB&I
employees.
(a) Training shall include case studies of discriminatory
practices.
(b) Training shall define key terms included in employee protection
regulations, nuclear safety culture and safety conscious work
environment policy statements, and be informed by the industry's common
language initiative (e.g., nuclear safety issue, protected activity,
adverse action, nuclear safety culture traits).
(c) Training shall include topics such as behavioral expectations
with regard to each nuclear safety culture trait. Training shall also
include expectations for demonstrating support for raising nuclear
safety and quality concerns, and all available avenues without fear of
retaliation.
(d) Training on CB&I's Corrective Action Program will also be
incorporated, and will emphasize the low threshold for reporting,
employee's rights, responsibilities and expectations for raising
nuclear safety and quality issues and initiating corrective action
documentation.
(e) By July 15, 2014, the training shall include willful violations
of NRC requirements and deliberate misconduct. Training shall note that
employees could be subject to individual enforcement action and/or
sanctions for violations of NRC requirements involving deliberate
misconduct. This training shall also include a case study on willful
violations of NRC regulations and deliberate misconduct.
(f) By September 16, 2014, CB&I shall revise new employee
orientation training to include the subject of willful violations of
NRC regulations and deliberate misconduct. This training shall note
that employees could be subject to individual enforcement action and/or
sanctions for violations of NRC requirements involving deliberate
misconduct. Training shall include an overview of how NRC regulations
(specifically, at minimum, 10 CFR 52.4, ``Deliberate misconduct,'' and
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, ``Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear
Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants'') apply to work being
performed by CB&I and shall include a statement that NRC regulations
are incorporated into CB&I policies, procedures and work practices to
ensure that all CB&I employees understand their roles and
responsibilities regarding compliance with NRC requirements.
(g) The training material shall be made available to the NRC upon
request.
2. Supervisory Training: Initial training, developed in paragraph
B.1 above, for supervisors shall be piloted at least in part by a team
consisting of the independent consultant and CB&I employees with
expertise in these areas. Once finalized, this training will be
conducted by the independent consultant at CB&I's Lake Charles site and
may be conducted by CB&I employees trained by the team who developed
and piloted the training at the other CB&I sites.
(a) The training shall commence no later than April 1, 2014.
(b) All training must be completed by December 31, 2014, and shall
include a message from senior management.
(c) Refresher training:
i. Shall be primarily instructor led and be provided at least every
two years for a period of four (4) years. This training may be provided
by CB&I training staff.
ii. Thereafter, refresher training may be computer-based and shall
be provided annually.
(d) Training records shall be retained consistent with applicable
CB&I record retention policies and be made available to the NRC upon
request.
3. CB&I shall conduct primarily instructor-led employee protection,
nuclear safety culture, safety conscious work environment training and
willfulness training twice per year for any new supervisors hired after
the initial training conducted as described in paragraphs 1 and 2
above.
4. Employee (Non-Supervisory) Training: Initial training, developed
in paragraph B.1, for employees shall be piloted at least in part by a
team consisting of the independent consultant and CB&I employees with
expertise in these areas. Once finalized, this training will be
conducted by the independent contractor at CB&I's Lake Charles site and
may be conducted by CB&I employees trained by the team who developed
and piloted the training at other CB&I sites.
(a) All employees training shall commence within six (6) months
following completion of their designated line managements' training.
(b) All training must be completed by March 31, 2015, and shall
include a message from senior management.
(c) Refresher training may be computer-based and shall be provided
annually.
(d) Training will be primarily instructor led for new employees as
part of their orientation program/process.
[[Page 60510]]
(e) Training records shall be retained consistent with applicable
CB&I record retention policies and be made available to the NRC upon
request.
5. Short-term Employee Training: Employees employed by CB&I for
less than ninety (90) days will receive a ``one pager'' that captures
the key elements of the training developed in Section B.1 above.
C. Work Processes
1. By no later than March 31, 2014, where not already required by
the applicable nuclear facility licensee, CB&I shall establish and
maintain a uniform Executive Review Board (ERB) process to ensure
independent management review of all proposed significant adverse
actions (defined as three or more days off without pay up to and
including termination for cause, but excluding reductions-in-force and
other ordinary layoffs) for all of its employees below the level of
Vice President to ensure these actions comport with applicable employee
protection requirements and nuclear safety culture traits, and to
assess and mitigate the potential for any chilling effect. The ERB
shall review significant adverse actions prior to their execution.
(a) The ERB process and procedure(s) shall be informed by
benchmarking at least 2 organizations in the nuclear industry with
developed processes. The ERB process shall be included as a topic in
the training developed in Section B.1.
(b) Each ERB shall be comprised of management personnel, including
legal and/or human resources participation. The ERB shall be informed
of any known relevant protected activity engaged in by the subject
employee, including via the Employee Concerns Program (ECP), but ECP
personnel shall not be a participating member of the ERB.
(c) Upon request, CB&I shall make available copies of the ERB
process and procedure, including documentation of ERB decisions made
after the Confirmatory Order, to the NRC. CB&I shall maintain
documentation of each ERB decision for a minimum of 5 years.
(d) By no later than December 31, 2014, willful violations of NRC
regulations and deliberate misconduct will be added to ERB tracking as
part of the safety culture monitoring and oversight program scope.
2. By no later than March 31, 2014, CB&I shall develop and maintain
a single Employee Concerns Program (ECP) for all CB&I employees.
(a) The ECP, including position descriptions, shall be informed by
benchmarking at least 2 organizations in the nuclear industry with
developed processes.
(b) The ECP Functional Manager will report to the Vice President,
Nuclear Safety for these activities, with day-to-day reporting and
oversight by the Director of Nuclear Compliance.
(c) ECP personnel shall receive appropriate training, including
investigative techniques.
(d) By no later than September 30, 2014, ECP effectiveness reports
and assessments shall include all instances of willful violations of
NRC regulations and deliberate misconduct discovered by, or otherwise
made known to, ECP personnel.
3. CB&I shall develop and maintain individual performance appraisal
assessment criteria for individual supervisor's appraisals to evaluate
if these individuals are meeting CB&I's expectations with regards to
employee protection, Nuclear Safety Culture and Safety Conscious Work
Environment. Implementation will begin in the performance appraisal
cycle in the year following completion of the supervisory training in
B.2 above.
4. CB&I shall enhance or establish, where applicable, an active CAP
trending process to include the ability to trend root and contributing
causes related to CB&I's nuclear safety culture and incorporate
trending information in an NEI 09-07 like process; implementation will
begin in concert with the implementation of the activities as described
in C.7. By no later than September 30, 2014, CB&I's CAP shall have the
ability to trend procedure-related issues and violations. Any trends in
wrongdoing identified through ECP and ERB monitoring shall be entered
into the Corrective Action Program.
5. By no later than March 31, 2014, CB&I shall develop and
implement a process by which personnel engaged in work associated with
NRC-regulated activities departing the company are given the
opportunity to participate in an Employee Concerns Program (ECP) Exit
Interview/Survey to facilitate identification of nuclear safety issues,
resulting trends and conclusions. These assessments and any actions
resulting from the exit interviews shall be made available to the NRC
for review upon request. By no later than September 30, 2014, the ECP
exit interview process shall include content related to willful
violations of NRC regulations and deliberate misconduct.
6. CB&I shall maintain a toll-free anonymous reporting service
manned by an independent company for use by all its employees to raise
nuclear safety and quality concerns.
7. By no later than March 31, 2014, CB&I shall establish and
maintain a nuclear safety culture oversight program, including one or
more committees advised by external consultants with extensive nuclear
experience. This program will provide input to CB&I facility and site
management as described below.
(a) The Program will assess at least twice a year the nuclear
safety culture trends in process inputs that could be early indications
of a nuclear safety culture weakness.
(b) The Program shall be informed by NEI's 09-07 guidance and by
benchmarking at least 2 organizations in the nuclear industry with
developed processes.
(c) The Program shall be directed by the Vice President Nuclear
Safety/Nuclear Safety Officer who shall oversee actions as appropriate.
(d) By no later than September 30, 2014, the identification and
tracking of willful violations of NRC regulations and deliberate
misconduct shall be incorporated into the safety culture oversight
monitoring program.
8. By no later than October 31, 2014, CB&I shall enter the
conditions associated with the wrongdoing event described in the NRC's
February 20, 2014, letter into its CAP, characterized as a significant
condition adverse to quality (SCAQ), and complete a root cause
analysis. CB&I shall evaluate the potential for similar issues at other
CB&I nuclear facilities and, if appropriate, initiate additional
corrective actions to address the cause of the wrongdoing.
9. By September 30, 2014, CAP guidance shall be revised as needed
to ensure future wrongdoing events are evaluated to determine if they
are SCAQ and require a root cause analysis. Wrongdoing-related SCAQs
will be reviewed for applicability at other CB&I nuclear-related
facilities.
10. By September 30, 2014, CB&I shall revise applicable procedures
on procedure use and adherence to reinforce the requirements of 10 CFR
52.6. Specifically, CB&I shall ensure that the ``Roles and
Responsibilities'' section clearly articulates: (1) the use and purpose
of an individual's signature; (2) that procedural requirements are
expected to be met; and (3) that complete and accurate information is
to be documented. Additionally, the ``Roles and Responsibilities''
section of the procedure shall include a warning about the significance
of falsification of documents in relation to nuclear safety and
violation of NRC requirements.
[[Page 60511]]
D. Assess and Monitor Nuclear Safety Culture and Safety Conscious Work
Environment
1. CB&I had previously established a CB&I Nuclear Safety Officer
function to address company-wide nuclear safety culture and safety
conscious work environment activities. The Vice President of Nuclear
Safety has been assigned the duties of the Nuclear Safety Officer.
2. By no later than March 31, 2014, CB&I shall hire a third-party,
independent consultant to perform tailored comprehensive nuclear safety
culture assessments, including site surveys, of all CB&I nuclear
business entities not already assessed by a licensee and perform
assessments or surveys within twelve (12) months to ensure
effectiveness of the Nuclear Safety Culture and Safety Conscious Work
Environment programs.
(a) Follow-up assessments or surveys shall be conducted every 2
years for a total of 4 years. These future nuclear safety culture
assessments or surveys shall be comparable to one another to allow for
effective evaluation of trends.
(b) CB&I shall make available to the NRC, upon request, the results
of the assessments or surveys, CB&I's analysis of the trends, results,
and proposed corrective actions, if any, CB&I will take to address the
results in order to verify that a healthy nuclear safety culture and
safety conscious work environment exists at CB&I nuclear business
entities.
(c) The results of each assessment or survey and CB&I's plan to
address the results shall be communicated to employees within three (3)
months of receiving the assessment/survey results.
(d) By no later than September 16, 2014, focused questions on
willful violations of NRC regulations and deliberate misconduct shall
be incorporated into safety culture assessments.
3. As committed to in CB&I's May 17, 2013, response to the NRC's
April 18, 2013, Chilling Effect Letter, CB&I shall:
(a) By September 20, 2013, perform an independent focused
assessment to determine if effective programmatic controls are in place
at CB&I Lake Charles in the following five areas: Control of special
processes; inspections; personnel training and qualification;
instructions, procedures, and drawings; and corrective action. The
assessment team will include, but will not be limited to,
representatives from Southern Nuclear Operating Company, South Carolina
Electric and Gas Company, and CB&I Power.
(b) Evaluate the results of the independent focused assessment and
take corrective actions as appropriate by October 31, 2013.
4. As committed to in CB&I's May 17, 2013, response to the NRC's
April 18, 2013, Chilling Effect Letter, CB&I reviewed the independent
contractor's 2012 nuclear safety culture assessment report and
initiated corrective actions, as necessary. The results of this report
were communicated to the Lake Charles workforce at an all hands meeting
on July 24, 2013.
E. Other
1. As committed to in CB&I's May 17, 2013, response to the NRC's
April 18, 2013, Chilling Effect Letter, CB&I Lake Charles has entered
the conditions associated with the Chilling Effect Letter into its
corrective action program, characterized it as a significant condition
adverse to quality, and completed a root cause analysis. By no later
than six (6) months after issuance of the Confirmatory Order, CB&I
shall evaluate the potential for similar issues at other CB&I nuclear
sites.
2. By no later than December 31, 2013, CB&I will revise and
maintain its Code of Corporate Conduct to include a provision stating
that all employees have the right to raise nuclear safety and quality
concerns to CB&I, the NRC, and Congress, or engage in any other type of
protected activity without being subject to disciplinary action or
retaliation and that no other corporate policy may supersede, limit, or
otherwise discourage an employee's right to raise a nuclear safety or
quality concern.
(a) By no later than December 31, 2014, CB&I shall revise its Code
of Conduct Policy to incorporate ``Deliberate Misconduct'' requirements
and its applicability to employees engaged in NRC-regulated activities.
(b) By no later than March 1, 2015, the new section must be
included, and explained, in the training conducted in Section IV.B
above.
In consideration for the actions and/or initiatives that CB&I
agrees to undertake, as outlined above, the NRC agrees to the
following:
1. The NRC agrees to exercise enforcement discretion and withdraw
the Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties
relating to employee protection and the Shaw Code of Conduct (EA-2012-
189).
2. The NRC agrees to exercise enforcement discretion and not pursue
a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties
relating to violations of 10 CFR 52.4, ``Deliberate misconduct,'' as
documented in OI Report 2-2011-036 (EA-2013-196).
3. This Confirmatory Order does not affect other potential
escalated enforcement actions, including ongoing investigations by the
NRC's Office of Investigations. However, as part of its deliberations
and consistent with the philosophy of the Enforcement Policy, Section
3.3, ``Violations Identified Because of Previous Enforcement Action,''
the NRC will consider enforcement discretion for violations with
similar root causes (i.e., EA-2012-189 and EA-2013-196) that occur
prior to or during implementation of the corrective actions aimed at
correcting that specific condition as specified in the Confirmatory
Order. However, in the event that CB&I does not demonstrate that the
work environment at its domestic sites and projects has improved as a
result of the agreed-to corrective actions, the NRC may consider
escalated enforcement action beyond the base civil penalty as provided
for in the NRC Enforcement Policy.
4. Confirmatory Order EA-12-189, dated September 16, 2013, is
rescinded in its entirety, and is replaced by this Confirmatory Order.
The Director, OE, may, in writing, relax or rescind any of the
above conditions upon demonstration by CB&I of good cause.
V
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, CB&I and any other person
adversely affected by this Order may submit an answer to this Order
within 30 days of issuance. In addition, any other person adversely
affected by this Order may request a hearing on this Order within 30
days of issuance. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be
given to extending the time to answer or request a hearing. A request
for extension of time must be directed to the Director, Office of
Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and include a
statement of good cause for the extension.
All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a
request for hearing, a petition for leave to intervene, any motion or
other document filed in the proceeding prior to the submission of a
request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by
interested governmental entities participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c),
must be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139,
August 28, 2007, as amended by 77 FR 46562, August 3, 2012), codified
in pertinent part at 10 CFR Part 2, Subpart C. The E-Filing process
requires participants to submit and serve all adjudicatory documents
over the internet, or in some cases to mail copies on electronic
storage media.
[[Page 60512]]
Participants may not submit paper copies of their filings unless they
seek an exemption in accordance with the procedures described below.
To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 10
days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should contact the
Office of the Secretary by email at hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by
telephone at (301) 415-1677, to request (1) a digital ID certificate,
which allows the participant (or its counsel or representative) to
digitally sign documents and access the E-Submittal server for any
proceeding in which it is participating; and (2) advise the Secretary
that the participant will be submitting a request or petition for
hearing (even in instances in which the participant, or its counsel or
representative, already holds an NRC-issued digital ID certificate).
Based upon this information, the Secretary will establish an electronic
docket for the hearing in this proceeding if the Secretary has not
already established an electronic docket.
Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is
available on NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/getting-started.html. System requirements for accessing the
E-Submittal server are detailed in NRC's ``Guidance for Electronic
Submission,'' which is available on the agency's public Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants may
attempt to use other software not listed on the Web site, but should
note that the NRC's E-Filing system does not support unlisted software,
and the NRC Meta System Help Desk will not be able to offer assistance
in using unlisted software.
If a participant is electronically submitting a document to the NRC
in accordance with the E-Filing rule, the participant must file the
document using the NRC's online, web-based submission form. In order to
serve documents through EIE, users will be required to install a web
browser plug-in from the NRC Web site. Further information on the web-
based submission form, including the installation of the Web browser
plug-in, is available on the NRC's public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.
Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a
docket has been created, the participant can then submit a request for
hearing or petition for leave to intervene through the EIE. Submissions
should be in Portable Document Format (PDF) in accordance with NRC
guidance available on the NRC public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the
time the documents are submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To
be timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing
system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on the due date. Upon
receipt of a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document
and sends the submitter an email notice confirming receipt of the
document. The E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that
provides access to the document to the NRC Office of the General
Counsel and any others who have advised the Office of the Secretary
that they wish to participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need
not serve the documents on those participants separately. Therefore,
any others who wish to participate in the proceeding (or their counsel
or representative) must apply for and receive a digital ID certificate
before a hearing request/petition to intervene is filed so that they
can obtain access to the document via the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using the agency's adjudicatory E-
Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC Meta System
Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC Web site
at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by email at
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a toll-free call at (866) 672-7640. The
NRC Meta System Help Desk is available between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., ET,
Monday through Friday, excluding government holidays.
Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not
submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing
requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) first class mail
addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth
Floor, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland, 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff.
Participants filing a document in this manner are responsible for
serving the document on all other participants. Filing is considered
complete by first-class mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or
by courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing
the document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer,
having granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a
participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer
subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from
use of E-Filing no longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in
NRC's electronic hearing docket, which is available to the public at
https://ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the
Commission or the presiding officer. Participants are requested not to
include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers,
home addresses, or home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC
regulation or other law requires submission of such information. With
respect to copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve
the purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use
application, participants are requested not to include copyrighted
materials in their submission.
If a person other than CB&I requests a hearing, that person shall
set forth with particularity the manner in which his interest is
adversely affected by this Order and shall address the criteria set
forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d) and (f).
If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely
affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating the time and
place of any hearings. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered
at such hearing shall be whether this Order should be sustained.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202(c)(2)(i), any other person adversely affected
by this Order, may, in addition to demanding a hearing, at the time the
answer is filed or sooner, move the presiding officer to set aside the
immediate effectiveness of the Order on the ground that the Order,
including the need for immediate effectiveness, is not based on
adequate evidence but on mere suspicion, unfounded allegations, or
error. In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval
of an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions
specified in Section IV above shall be final 30 days from the date of
issuance of this Order without further order or proceedings. If an
extension of time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the
provisions specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension
expires if a hearing request has not been received.
[[Page 60513]]
An answer or a request for hearing shall not stay the immediate
effectiveness of this order.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of September 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Patricia K. Holahan, Ph.D.,
Acting Director, Office of Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2014-23939 Filed 10-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P