Rules of Practice in Explosives License and Permit Proceedings (2007R-5P); Revisions Reflecting Changes Consistent With the Homeland Security Act of 2002, 60391-60405 [2014-23932]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
unless it has been inspected following the
applicable paragraph of PILATUS PC–7
Service Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision No. 1,
dated August 26, 2014.
(1) For airplanes with any parts made of
aluminum alloy AA2124–T851: Within 12
months after the effective date of this AD,
make an entry in the aircraft logbook as
required by paragraph 3.D.(3) of PILATUS
PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision
No. 1, dated August 26, 2014. The only other
actions of this AD that apply to airplanes
with all parts made of aluminum alloy
AA2124–T851 are the actions in paragraphs
(f)(3), (f)(4), and (f)(5) of this AD.
(2) For airplanes with any parts made of
aluminum alloy AA2024–T351: Within 12
months after the effective date of this AD, do
the actions in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) through
(f)(2)(iii) as applicable, including all
subparagraphs:
(i) For items 7 through 9 and 11 through
13 as listed in paragraph 1.A.(2) of PILATUS
PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision
No. 1, dated August 26, 2014, within 12
months after the effective date of this AD, do
a one-time inspection for cracks. If any cracks
are found as a result of the inspection, before
further flight, you must contact PILATUS
Aircraft Ltd. to obtain FAA-approved repair
instructions approved specifically for
compliance with this AD and incorporate
those instructions. Use the contact
information found in paragraph (h) of this
AD.
(ii) For item 6 as listed in paragraph 1.A.(2)
of PILATUS PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51–
001, Revision No. 1, dated August 26, 2014,
within 12 months after the effective date of
this AD, replace with a part made of
aluminum alloy AA2124–T851.
(iii) For Items 1, 2, 4, 5, and 10 as listed
in paragraph 1.A.(2) of PILATUS PC–7
Service Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision No. 1,
dated August 26, 2014, within 12 months
after the effective date of this AD, do the
following actions in paragraphs (f)(2)(iii)(A)
and (f)(2)(iii)(B), as applicable.
(A) For items 1, 2, 4, and 10 as listed in
paragraph 1.A.(2) of PILATUS PC–7 Service
Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision No. 1, dated
August 26, 2014, do a one-time inspection for
cracks. If any cracks are found, before further
flight, you must contact PILATUS Aircraft
Ltd. to obtain FAA-approved repair
instructions approved specifically for
compliance with this AD and incorporate
those instructions. Use the contact
information found in paragraph (h) of this
AD.
(B) For item 5 as listed in paragraph 1.A.(2)
of PILATUS PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51–
001, Revision No. 1, dated August 26, 2014,
replace with a part made of aluminum alloy
AA2124–T851.
(3) For all airplanes: For item 3 as listed
in paragraph 1.A.(2) of PILATUS PC–7
Service Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision No. 1,
dated August 26, 2014, within 12 months
after the effective date of this AD, replace
with a part made of aluminum alloy
AA2124–T851. You must replace the elevator
center control-rods (item 3 as listed in
paragraph 1.A.(2) of PILATUS PC–7 Service
Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision No. 1, dated
August 26, 2014) because it is difficult to
inspect them for cracks.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
(4) For all airplanes: As of 12 months after
the effective date of this AD, do not install
the parts listed in items 1 and 2, 4, and 7
through 13 of paragraph 1.A.(2) of PILATUS
PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision
No. 1, dated August 26, 2014, that are made
of aluminum alloy AA2024–T351 unless they
have been inspected and found free of cracks.
(5) For all airplanes: As of 12 months after
the effective date of this AD, do not install
the parts listed in items 3, 5, and 6 of
paragraph 1.A.(2) of PILATUS PC–7 Service
Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision No. 1, dated
August 26, 2014, that are made of aluminum
alloy AA2024–T351.
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4059; fax: (816) 329–
4090; email: doug.rudolph@faa.gov. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, a federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
(h) Related Information
Refer to Federal Office of Civil Aviation
(FOCA) AD HB–2014–001, dated July 25,
2014, for related information. You may
examine the MCAI on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–0770.
For service information related to this AD,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60391
contact PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD., Customer
Technical Support (MCC), P.O. Box 992, CH–
6371 Stans, Switzerland; phone: +41 (0)41
619 67 74; fax: +41 (0)41 619 67 73; email:
Techsupport@pilatus-aircraft.com; Internet:
https://www.pilatus-aircraft.com. You may
review this referenced service information at
the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
September 30, 2014.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–23880 Filed 10–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives
27 CFR Parts 478, 555, and 771
[Docket No. ATF 33P; AG Order No. 3469–
2014]
RIN 1140–AA40
Rules of Practice in Explosives
License and Permit Proceedings
(2007R–5P); Revisions Reflecting
Changes Consistent With the
Homeland Security Act of 2002
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives (ATF),
Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
proposes to codify the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives (ATF) procedures and
practices in connection with the
disapproval of initial applications,
denials of renewal, and revocations of
explosives licenses or permits. The
proposed regulations will be codified in
a new part entitled ‘‘Rules and Practice
in License and Permit Proceedings.’’
The proposed regulations are based
upon the regulations that ATF relied
upon prior to its transfer from the
Department of the Treasury to the
Department of Justice.
Additionally, the Department
proposes minor revisions to regulations
governing administrative proceedings
related to the denial, suspension, or
revocation of a license, and the
imposition of a civil fine under Federal
firearms law to reference regulations
under ATF authority. These proposed
revisions remove all references to
statutes, regulations, positions, and
other terms that are applicable only to
the Department of the Treasury. These
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
60392
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
revisions reflect ATF’s position as a
regulatory and enforcement agency
under the Department of Justice and are
consistent with the proposed
regulations governing administrative
hearing processes for explosives
licenses and permits.
DATES: Written comments must be
postmarked and electronic comments
must be submitted on or before January
5, 2015. Commenters should be aware
that the electronic Federal Docket
Management System will not accept
comments after midnight Eastern Time
on the last day of the comment period.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, identified
by docket number (ATF 33P), by any of
the following methods:
• Mail: Denise Brown, Enforcement
Programs and Services, Office of
Regulatory Affairs, Mailstop 6N–602,
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives, 99 New York Avenue
NE., Washington, DC 20226; ATTN:
ATF 33P. Written comments must
appear in minimum 12-point font size
(.17 inches), include the sender’s
mailing address, and be signed; they
may be of any length.
• Fax: 202–648–9741.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted
without change to the Federal
eRulemaking portal, https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Denise Brown, Enforcement Programs
and Services, Office of Regulatory
Affairs, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives, U.S.
Department of Justice, 99 New York
Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20226;
telephone: (202) 648–7070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Attorney General has delegated to
the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
(ATF) responsibility for administering
and enforcing title I of the Gun Control
Act of 1968 (GCA), Public Law 90–618,
as amended, 18 U.S.C. Chapter 44,
relating to commerce in firearms and
ammunition; and Title XI, Regulation of
Explosives, of the Organized Crime
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
Control Act of 1970 (OCCA), Public Law
91–452, as amended, 18 U.S.C. Chapter
40. See 18 U.S.C. 926(a); 18 U.S.C. 843;
28 CFR 0.130. Under the GCA, ATF has
the authority to license applicants,
renew licenses, and revoke Federal
firearms licenses. The OCCA, as
amended by the Safe Explosives Act,
Title XI, Subtitle C of Public Law 107–
296, the Homeland Security Act of 2002
(enacted November 25, 2002),
authorizes ATF to provide licenses and
permits to qualified applicants for the
acquisition, distribution, storage, or use
of explosive materials and renew or
revoke such licenses and permits.
A. Rules of Practice in Permit
Proceedings (27 CFR Part 71)
On November 25, 2002, President
George W. Bush signed the Homeland
Security Act of 2002, Public Law 107–
296 (the Act), which divided the
regulatory functions of the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms into
two separate agencies. The Act renamed
the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms as the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and
transferred law enforcement and certain
regulatory functions to the Department
of Justice. The Act also retained in the
Department of the Treasury (Treasury)
certain functions of the former Bureau
of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. The
functions retained by Treasury became
the responsibility of a new Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB).
As a result of the Act, TTB has all
regulatory authority under 27 CFR Part
71 and ATF therefore cannot
promulgate new regulations under this
part, although ATF uses the regulations
in Part 71 to administer hearings related
to the application and revocation of
Federal explosives licenses and permits.
B. License Proceedings (27 CFR Part
478)
Regulations that implement the
provisions of the GCA are set forth in 27
CFR Part 478. Subpart E of Part 478
relates to proceedings involving Federal
firearms licensees, including the denial,
suspension, or revocation of licenses
and the imposition of civil fines.
Specifically, 27 CFR 478.76 provides
that an applicant or licensee may be
represented at a hearing for the
disapproval of applications for firearms
licenses, for the denial, suspension, or
revocation of a firearms license, or for
imposition of a civil fine under federal
firearms law by an attorney, a certified
public accountant, or any other person
recognized to practice before ATF as
provided in 31 CFR Part 8, if the
representative complies with the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
applicable practice requirements of 26
CFR 601.521 through 601.527.
C. License and Permit Proceedings (27
CFR Part 555)
The regulations that implement OCCA
procedural and substantive
requirements are found in 27 CFR Part
555. Subpart E of Part 555 relates to
proceedings involving Federal
explosives licensees and permittees,
including the denial of an initial
application, denial of a renewal, and
revocation of a license or permit.
Specifically, 27 CFR 555.78 provides
that an applicant, licensee, or permittee
may be represented at a hearing for the
disapproval of applications for
explosives licenses, and for the denial of
renewal or revocation of such licenses
or permits under federal explosives law
by an attorney, a certified public
accountant, or any other person
recognized to practice before ATF as
provided in 31 CFR Part 8, if the
representative complies with the
applicable practice requirements of 26
CFR 601.521 through 601.527.
II. Proposed Rule
A. Creation of new 27 CFR Part 771
The Department proposes revising
ATF regulations to add a new part that
implements 18 U.S.C. 843 and 847
relating to the procedures and practice
for the disapproval of initial
applications, denials of a renewal, and
revocations of explosives licenses or
permits by ATF under federal
explosives law. ATF is incorporating
and updating the language relevant to
its operations currently found in Part 71
into proposed 27 CFR Part 771. The
creation of Part 771 is primarily an
administrative change that will improve
the organization of ATF regulations. The
proposed regulations will be codified in
a new part 771 in Chapter II of title 27
CFR and are separated into subparts as
follows:
Subpart A—Scope and Construction
Subpart B—Definitions
Subpart C—General
Subpart D—Compliance and Settlement
Subpart E—Grounds for Revocation or Denial
Subpart F—Hearing Procedure
Subpart G—Administrative Law Judges
Subpart H—Decisions
Subpart I—Review
Subpart J—Miscellaneous
B. Proposed Amendments to 27 CFR
Part 478
This proposed rule amends ATF
regulations governing procedures and
practices for disapproving applications
for firearms licenses; for denying,
suspending, or revoking a firearms
license; and for imposing a civil fine
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
under federal firearms law. The
proposed rule revises 27 CFR 478.76 to
allow an applicant or licensee to be
represented at a proceeding by himself,
an attorney, a certified public
accountant, or any other person without
submitting a declaration of a
representative pursuant to 26 CFR
601.521, and it deletes the current
references to 31 CFR Part 8 and 26 CFR
601.521 through 601.527. Under the
proposed rule, an applicant or licensee
shall file in the proceeding a duly
executed power of attorney designating
his representative. The applicant or
licensee shall also file waivers, if
applicable, under the Privacy Act of
1974 (see 5 U.S.C. 552a), and 26 U.S.C.
6103(c) (confidentiality and disclosure
of returns and return information). The
Director of Industry Operations may be
represented in proceedings under
§§ 478.72 and 478.74 by an attorney for
the government in the ATF Office of
Chief Counsel who is authorized to
execute and file motions, briefs, and
other papers in the proceeding on behalf
of the Director of Industry Operations in
the attorney’s own name as ‘‘Attorney
for the Government.’’
C. Proposed Amendments to 27 CFR
Part 555
This proposed rule amends ATF
regulations governing procedures and
practices for disapproving applications,
denying renewals, and revoking
explosives licenses or permits under
federal explosives law. This proposed
rule amends § 555.73 and § 555.73 to
state that the administrative hearings
will be conducted in accordance with
the hearing procedures prescribed in
part 771, thereby replacing the current
references in these sections to part 71.
The proposed rule revises 27 CFR
555.78 to allow an applicant, licensee,
or permittee to be represented at a
proceeding by himself, an attorney, a
certified public accountant, or any other
person without submitting a declaration
of a representative pursuant to 26 CFR
601.521, and it deletes the current
references to 31 CFR Part 8 and 26 CFR
601.521 through 601.527. Under the
proposed rule, an applicant, licensee, or
permittee shall file in the proceeding a
duly executed power of attorney
designating his representative. The
applicant, licensee, or permittee shall
also file waivers, if applicable, under
the Privacy Act of 1974 (see 5 U.S.C.
552(a)) and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c)
(confidentiality and disclosure of
returns and return information). An
attorney for the government may
represent the Director of Industry
Operations under §§ 555.73 and 555.75
who is authorized to execute and file
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
motions, briefs, and other papers in the
proceeding, on behalf of the Director of
Industry Operations, in the attorney’s
own name as ‘‘Attorney for the
Government.’’
This proposed rule amends § 555.79
to state that, in the event that an appeal
is taken from a decision of a hearing, the
process by which the Director will
review the complete original record will
be contained in a new part 771, thereby
replacing the current reference in this
section to part 71.
This proposed rule revises § 555.82 to
state that regulations governing the
procedures and practices for
disapproving applications for explosives
licenses and permits and for denying
renewal of or revoking such licenses
and permits are contained in a new Part
771.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866 and 13563
This proposed rule has been drafted
and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review,’’ section 1(b), The
Principles of Regulation and in
accordance with Executive Order 13563,
‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review,’’ section 1, General Principles
of Regulation, and section 6,
Retrospective Analyses of Existing
Rules.
Further, both Executive Orders 12866
and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. The
Department has assessed the costs and
benefits of this regulation and believes
that the regulatory approach selected
maximizes net benefits.
This rule will not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more, nor will it adversely affect in
a material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
government or communities. Similarly,
it does not create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency, materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60393
thereof, or raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, this rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined in Executive Order 12866.
Section 6 of Executive Order 13563,
directs agencies to develop a plan to
review existing significant rules that
may be ‘‘outmoded, ineffective,
insufficient, or excessively
burdensome,’’ and to make appropriate
changes where warranted. The
Department selected and reviewed this
rule under the criteria set forth in its
Plan for Retrospective Analysis of
Existing Rules, and determined that this
proposed rule transfers and consolidates
regulations governing explosives license
application renewal or revocation of
licenses and permits, improving the
enforcement of ATF regulations.
B. Executive Order 13132
This proposed regulation will not
have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, the Attorney General has
determined that this proposed
regulation does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary
impact statement.
C. Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule meets the
applicable standards set forth in
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice Reform.’’
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)) exempts an agency from
the requirement to conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements if the agency certifies that
the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities
include small businesses, small not-forprofit enterprises, and small
governmental jurisdictions. The
Attorney General has reviewed this
proposed rule and, by approving it,
certifies that it will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule recodifies the ATF
regulations governing the procedure and
practice for disapproving applications,
denying renewals, and revoking
explosives licenses or permits under
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
60394
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
federal explosives law in a new part 771
under ATF’s regulatory authority.
Additionally, this proposed rule
updates the regulations governing the
denial, suspension, or revocation of a
firearms license, and imposition of a
civil fine under federal firearms law to
only reference regulations under ATF
authority. This proposed rule also
amends the regulations to require an
applicant or licensee in a proceeding
concerning the denial, suspension, or
revocation of a firearms license, or the
imposition of a civil fine under federal
firearms law, to file a duly executed
power of attorney designating his
representative, and waivers, if
applicable, under the Privacy Act of
1974 (See 5 U.S.C. 552(a)), and 26
U.S.C. 6103(c) (confidentiality and
disclosure of returns and return
information). This is required in the
current regulations by reference to 31
CFR Part 8 and 26 CFR 601.521 through
601.527. The changes proposed in this
rule are purely administrative and do
not add any new requirements that
would have any impact on the economy.
E. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This proposed rule is not a major rule
as defined by section 251 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 804. This
proposed rule will not result in an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more; a major increase in
costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This proposed rule will not result in
the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
by the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose
any new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
Public Participation
A. Comments Sought
ATF is requesting comments on the
proposed rule from all interested
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
persons. ATF is also specifically
requesting comments on the clarity of
this proposed rule and how it may be
made easier to understand.
All comments must reference this
document docket number (ATF 33P), be
legible, and include the commenter’s
name and mailing address. ATF will
treat all comments as originals and will
not acknowledge receipt of comments.
Comments received on or before the
closing date will be carefully
considered. Comments received after
that date will be given the same
consideration if it is practical to do so,
but assurance of consideration cannot
be given except as to comments received
on or before the closing date.
B. Confidentiality
Comments, whether submitted
electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at ATF and
on the Internet as part of the
eRulemaking initiative. Comments are
subject to the Freedom of Information
Act. Commenters who do not want their
names or other personal identifying
information posted on the Internet
should submit their comments by mail
or facsimile, along with a separate cover
sheet containing their personal
identifying information. Both the cover
sheet and comment must reference this
docket number. Information contained
in the cover sheet will not be posted on
the Internet. Any personal identifying
information that appears within the
comment will be posted on the Internet
and will not be redacted by ATF.
Any material that a commenter
considers to be inappropriate for
disclosure to the public should not be
included in the comment. Any person
submitting a comment shall specifically
designate that portion (if any) of the
comments that contains material that is
confidential under law (e.g., trade
secrets, processes, etc.). Any portion of
a comment that is confidential under
law shall be set forth on pages separate
from the balance of the comment and
shall be prominently marked
‘‘confidential’’ at the top of each page.
Confidential information will be
included in the rulemaking record but
will not be disclosed to the public. Any
comments containing material that is
not confidential under law may be
disclosed to the public. In any event, the
name of the person submitting a
comment is not exempt from disclosure.
C. Submitting Comments
Comments may be submitted in any of
three ways:
• Mail: Send written comments to the
address listed in the ADDRESSES section
of this document. Written comments
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
may be of any length, must appear in
minimum 12-point font size (.17
inches), and include the commenter’s
mailing address and signature.
• Facsimile: You may submit
comments by facsimile transmission to
(202) 648–9741. Faxed comments must:
(1) Be legible and appear in minimum
12-point font size (.17 inches);
(2) Be on 81⁄2″ x 11″ paper;
(3) Contain a legible, written
signature; and
(4) Be no more than five pages long.
ATF will not accept faxed comments
that exceed five pages.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: To
submit comments to ATF via the
Federal eRulemaking portal, visit
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for submitting
comments.
D. Request for Hearing
Any interested person who desires an
opportunity to comment orally at a
public hearing should submit such
request for a hearing, in writing, to the
Director of ATF within the 90-day
comment period. Address requests for
public hearings to Denise Brown,
Enforcement Programs and Services,
Office of Regulatory Affairs, Mailstop
6N–602, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives, 99 New York
Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20226;
ATTN: ATF 33P. The Director, however,
reserves the right to determine, in light
of all circumstances, whether a public
hearing is necessary.
Disclosure
Copies of this proposed rule and the
comments received will be available for
public inspection by appointment
during normal business hours at: ATF
Reading Room, Room 1E–062, 99 New
York Avenue NE., Washington, DC
20226; telephone: (202) 648–8740.
Drafting Information
The author of this document is Denise
Brown; Enforcement Programs and
Services; Office of Regulatory Affairs,
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives.
List of Subjects
27 CFR Part 478
Administrative practice and
procedure, Arms and munitions,
Customs duties and inspection, Exports,
Imports, Intergovernmental relations,
Law enforcement officers, Military
personnel, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Research,
Seizures and forfeitures, Transportation.
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
§ 555.78
27 CFR Part 555
Representation at a hearing.
1. The authority citation for 27 CFR
part 478 continues to read as follows:
An applicant, licensee, or permittee
may represent himself, or be
represented by an attorney, a certified
public accountant, or any other person,
specifically designated in a duly
executed power of attorney that shall be
filed in the proceeding by the applicant,
licensee, or permittee. The applicant,
licensee, or permittee shall file waivers,
if applicable, under the Privacy Act of
1974 and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c)
(confidentiality and disclosure of
returns and return information). The
Director of Industry Operations may be
represented in proceedings under
§§ 555.73 and 555.75 by an attorney in
the Office of Chief Counsel who is
authorized to execute and file motions,
briefs and other papers in the
proceeding, on behalf of the Director of
Industry Operations, in the attorney’s
own name as ‘‘Attorney for the
Government.’’
■ 7. Amend § 555.79 by removing ‘‘part
71’’ and adding in its place ‘‘part 771’’.
■ 8. Revise § 555.82 to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 18 U.S.C. 847,
921–931; 44 U.S.C. 3504(h).
§ 555.82 Rules of practice in license and
permit proceedings.
2. Section 478.76 is revised to read as
follows:
Regulations governing the procedure
and practice for disapproval of
applications for explosives licenses and
permits and for the denial of renewal or
revocation of such licenses and permits
under the Act are contained in part 771
of this chapter.
■ 9. Add subchapter E (consisting of
part 771) to 27 CFR chapter II to read
as follows:
Administrative practice and
procedure, Customs duties and
inspection, Explosives, Hazardous
substances, Imports, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Safety, Security measures,
Seizures and forfeitures, Transportation,
Warehouses.
27 CFR Part 771
Administrative practice and
procedure, Explosives.
Authority and Issuance
Accordingly, for the reasons
discussed in the preamble, 27 CFR Parts
478 and 555 are proposed to be
amended and Part 771 is proposed to be
added to chapter II, title 27 as follows:
PART 478—COMMERCE IN FIREARMS
AND AMMUNITION
■
■
§ 478.76
Representation at a hearing.
Applicants or licensees may represent
themselves or be represented by an
attorney, a certified public accountant,
or any other person, specifically
designated in a duly executed power of
attorney that shall be filed in the
proceeding by the applicant or licensee.
The applicant or licensee shall file
waivers, if applicable, under the Privacy
Act of 1974 and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c)
(confidentiality and disclosure of
returns and return information). The
Director of Industry Operations may be
represented in proceedings under
§§ 478.72 and 478.74 by an attorney in
the Office of Chief Counsel who is
authorized to execute and file motions,
briefs, and other papers in the
proceeding, on behalf of the Director of
Industry Operations, in the attorney’s
own name as ‘‘Attorney for the
Government.’’
3. The authority citation for 27 CFR
part 555 continues to read as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 847.
4. Amend § 555.73 by removing ‘‘part
71’’ and adding in its place ‘‘part 771’’.
■ 5. Amend § 555.75 by removing ‘‘part
71’’ and adding in its place ‘‘part 771’’.
■ 6. Revise 555.78 to read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
Subpart D—Compliance and Settlement
771.35 Opportunity for compliance.
771.36 Settlement.
771.37 Notice of contemplated action.
771.38 Licensee’s or permittee’s failure to
meet requirements within reasonable
time.
771.39 Authority of Director of Industry
Operations to proceed with revocation or
denial action.
Subpart E—Revocation or Denial
771.40 Denial of initial application
771.41 Denial of renewal application or
revocation of license or permit
771.42 Grounds for revocation of licenses
or permits.
771.43 Grounds for denial of applications
for licenses or permits.
Subpart F—Hearing Procedure
Notices
771.55
771.56
771.57
771.58
Content.
Forms.
Execution and disposition.
Designated place of hearing.
Request for Hearing
771.59 Initial application proceedings.
771.60 Revocation or denial of renewal
proceedings.
771.61 Notice of hearing.
Non-Request for Hearing
771.62
771.63
Initial application
Revocation or denial of renewal.
Responses to Notices
771.64
771.65
771.66
Answers.
Responses admitting facts.
Initial conferences.
Failure To Appear
771.67
771.68
Initial applications.
Revocation or denial of renewal.
Waiver of Hearing
PART 771—RULES OF PRACTICE IN
EXPLOSIVE LICENSE AND PERMIT
PROCEEDINGS
771.69 Withdrawal of request for hearing.
771.70 Adjudication based upon written
submissions.
Subpart A—Scope and Construction of
Regulations
Sec.
771.1 Scope of part.
771.2 Liberal construction.
771.3 Forms prescribed.
Surrender of License or Permit
Subpart B—Definitions
771.5 Meaning of terms.
Time
771.28
771.29
Computation.
Continuances and extensions.
Representation at Hearings
771.30 Personal representation.
771.31 Attorneys and other representatives.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
771.71
771.72
Before citation.
After citation.
Motions
771.73
771.74
771.75
General.
Prior to hearing.
At hearing.
Hearing
Subpart C—General
771.25 Communications and pleadings.
771.26 Service on applicant, licensee, or
permittee.
771.27 Service on the Director of Industry
Operations or Director.
PART 555—COMMERCE IN
EXPLOSIVES
■
SUBCHAPTER E—EXPLOSIVE
LICENSE AND PERMIT PROCEEDINGS
60395
771.76
771.77
771.78
General.
Initial applications.
Revocation or denial of renewal.
Burden of Proof
771.79
771.80
Initial applications.
Revocation or denial of renewal.
General
771.81 Stipulations at hearing.
771.82 Evidence.
771.83 Closing of hearings; arguments,
briefs, and proposed findings.
771.84 Reopening of the hearing.
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
60396
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Record of Testimony
§ 771.3
771.85
771.86
(a) The Director is authorized to
prescribe all forms required by this part.
All of the information called for in each
form shall be furnished as indicated by
the headings on the form and the
instructions on or pertaining to the
form. In addition, information called for
in each form shall be furnished as
required by this part.
(b) Requests for forms should be made
to the ATF Distribution Center or
through the ATF Web site at https://
www.atf.gov.
Stenographic record.
Oath of reporter.
Subpart G—Administrative Law Judges
771.95 Responsibilities of administrative
law judges.
771.96 Disqualification.
771.97 Powers.
771.98 Separation of functions.
771.99 Conduct of hearing.
771.100 Unavailability of administrative
law judge.
Subpart H—Decisions
771.105 Administrative law judge’s
findings and recommended decision.
771.106 Certification and transmittal of
record and decision.
Action by Director of Industry Operations
771.107 Initial application proceedings.
771.108 Director of Industry Operations’
decision.
771.109 Revocation or denial of renewal
proceedings.
771.110 Revocation or denial of renewal.
771.111 Proceedings involving violations
not within the division of issuance of
license or permit.
Subpart I—Review
771.120
771.121
771.122
771.123
Appeal on petition to the Director.
Review by Director.
Denial of renewal or revocation.
Court review.
Subpart J—Miscellaneous
771.124
771.125
771.126
771.127
Depositions.
Witnesses and fees.
Discovery.
Privileges.
Record
771.135
771.136
What constitutes record.
Availability.
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 843, 847.
Subpart A—Scope and Construction of
Regulations
§ 771.1
Scope of part.
Regulations in this part govern
procedures and practices for
disapproving applications for licenses
and permits and denying renewal of or
revocation of such licenses or permits
under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 771.2
Liberal construction.
Regulations in this part shall be
liberally construed to secure just,
expeditious, and efficient determination
of the issues presented. The Rules of
Civil Procedure for the U.S. District
Courts (28 U.S.C. appendix) are not
controlling, but may act as a guide in
any situation not provided for or
controlled by this part and shall be
liberally construed or relaxed when
necessary.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
Forms prescribed.
of, denial of renewal of, or denial of
application for a license or permit. This
decision becomes the agency’s final
decision in the absence of an appeal.
Final decision. The definitive
decision of ATF, e.g., the agency’s
decision in the absence of an appeal or
the Director’s decision following an
appeal to the Director.
License. Subject to applicable law,
entitles the licensee to transport, ship,
and receive explosive materials in
interstate or foreign commerce, and to
engage in the business specified by the
license, at the location described on the
Subpart B—Definitions
license.
Licensee. Any importer,
§ 771.5 Meaning of terms.
manufacturer, or dealer licensed under
When used in this part and in forms
the provisions of 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40
prescribed under this part, where not
and 27 CFR Part 555.
otherwise distinctly expressed or
Limited permit. A permit issued to a
manifestly incompatible with the intent person authorizing him to receive for
thereof, terms shall have the meaning
his use explosive materials from a
provided in this subpart. Words in the
licensee or permittee in his State of
plural form shall include the singular,
residence on no more than six occasions
and vice versa, and words importing the during the 12-month period in which
masculine gender shall include the
the permit is valid. A limited permit
feminine.
does not authorize the receipt or
Administrative law judge. The person transportation of explosive materials in
appointed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3105,
interstate or foreign commerce.
designated to preside over any
Other term. Any other term defined in
administrative proceedings under this
the Federal explosives laws (18 U.S.C.
part.
Chapter 40), the regulations
Applicant. Any person who has filed
promulgated thereunder (27 CFR Part
an application for a license or permit
555), or the Administrative Procedure
under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40.
Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.), where used
Application. Any application for a
in this part, shall have the meaning
license or permit under 18 U.S.C.
assigned to it therein.
Chapter 40 for operations not covered
Permittee. Any user of explosives for
by an existing license or permit.
a lawful purpose who has obtained
ATF. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, either a user permit or a limited permit
Firearms, and Explosives, Department of under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40 and 27 CFR
Justice.
Part 555.
Attorney for the Government. An
Person. Any individual, corporation,
attorney in the ATF Office of Chief
association, firm, partnership, society,
Counsel authorized to represent the
or joint stock company.
Director of Industry Operations in the
Recommended decision. The advisory
proceeding.
decision of the administrative law judge
CFR. The Code of Federal
in any proceeding regarding the
Regulations.
revocation of, denial of renewal of, or
Contemplated notice. Includes any
denial of application for a license or
notice contemplating the revocation or
permit. ATF must act on a
denial of renewal of a license or permit. recommended decision with its own
Director. The Director, Bureau of
initial or final decision.
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
User-limited permit. A user permit
Explosives, Department of Justice.
valid only for a single purchase
Director of Industry Operations. The
transaction. Recipients of a user-limited
principal ATF official in a Field
permit must obtain a new permit for any
Operations division responsible for
subsequent purchase transaction.
administering regulations in this part.
User permit. A permit issued to a
Ex parte communication. An oral or
person authorizing him to—
written communication not on the
(1) Acquire for his own use explosive
public record with respect to which
materials from a licensee in a State other
reasonable prior notice to all parties is
than the State in which he resides or
not given, but not including requests for from a foreign country, and;
status reports.
(2) Transport explosive materials in
Initial decision. The decision of the
interstate or foreign commerce.
Willfulness. The plain indifference to,
Director of Industry Operations in a
or purposeful disregard of, a known
proceeding concerning the revocation
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
legal duty. Willfulness may be
demonstrated by, but does not require,
repeat violations involving a known
legal duty.
Subpart C—General
§ 771.25
Communications and pleadings.
(a) All communications to the
Government regarding the procedures
set forth in this part and all pleadings,
such as answers, motions, requests, or
other papers or documents required or
permitted to be filed under this part,
relating to a proceeding pending before
an administrative law judge, shall be
addressed to the administrative law
judge at his post of duty and the
attorney for the Government.
Communications concerning
proceedings not pending before an
administrative law judge should be
addressed to the Director of Industry
Operations or Director, as the case may
be.
(b) Except to the extent required for
the disposition of ex parte matters as
authorized by law, no ex parte
communications shall be made to or
from the administrative law judge
concerning the merits of the
adjudication. If the administrative law
judge receives or makes an ex parte
communication not authorized by law,
the administrative law judge shall place
on the record of the proceeding:
(1) All such written communications;
(2) Memoranda stating the substance
of all such oral communications; and
(3) All written responses and
memoranda stating the substance of all
oral responses to paragraphs (b)(1) and
(2) of this section.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 771.26 Service on applicant, licensee, or
permittee.
All orders, notices, motions, and other
formal documents required to be served
under the regulations in this part may
be served by mailing a signed, original
copy thereof to the designated
representative of the applicant, licensee,
or permittee by certified mail, with
request for return receipt card, at the
representative’s business address, by
personal service, or as otherwise agreed
to by the parties. If the applicant,
licensee, or permittee has not yet
designated a representative, all orders,
notices, motions, and other formal
documents required to be served under
the regulations in this part may be
served by mailing a signed, original
copy thereof to the applicant, licensee,
or permittee at the address stated on his
application, license, or permit, or at his
last known address, or by delivery of
such original copy to the applicant,
licensee, or permittee personally, or in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
the case of a corporation, partnership, or
other unincorporated association, by
delivering the same to an officer, or
manager, or general agent thereof, or to
its attorney of record. Such personal
service may be made by any employee
of the Department of Justice designated
by the Attorney General or by any
employee of ATF. A certificate of
mailing and the return receipt card, or
certificate of service signed by the
person making such service, shall be
filed as a part of the record.
§ 771.27 Service on the Director of
Industry Operations or Director.
Pleadings, motions, notices, and other
formal documents may be served by
certified mail, by personal service, or as
otherwise agreed to by the parties on the
Director of Industry Operations (or upon
the attorney for the Government on
behalf of the Director of Industry
Operations), or on the Director, if the
proceeding is before him for review on
appeal.
Time
§ 771.28
In computing any period of time
prescribed or allowed by this part, the
day of the act, event, or default after
which the designated period of time is
to run is not to be included. The last day
of the period to be computed is to be
included, unless it is a Saturday,
Sunday, or Federal holiday, in which
event the period runs until the next day
that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or
Federal holiday. Pleadings, requests, or
other papers or documents required or
permitted to be filed under this part
must be received for filing at the
appropriate office within the time
limits, if any, for such filing.
§ 771.29
Continuances and extensions.
For good cause shown, the
administrative law judge, Director, or
Director of Industry Operations, as the
case may be, may grant continuances
and, as to all matters pending before
him, extend any time limit prescribed
by the regulations in this part (except
where the time limit is statutory).
Representation at Hearings
§ 771.30
Personal representation.
Any individual or member of a
partnership may appear for himself, or
for such partnership, and a corporation
or association may be represented by a
bona fide officer of such corporation or
association, upon showing of adequate
authorization.
PO 00000
§ 771.31 Attorneys and other
representatives.
An applicant, licensee, or permittee
may represent himself, or be
represented by an attorney, a certified
public accountant, or any other person,
specifically designated in a duly
executed power of attorney that shall be
filed in the proceeding by the applicant,
licensee, or permittee. The applicant,
licensee, or permittee shall file waivers,
if applicable, under the Privacy Act of
1974 and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c)
(confidentiality and disclosure of
returns and return information). The
Director of Industry Operations may be
represented in proceedings by an
attorney in the Office of Chief Counsel
who is authorized to execute and file
motions, briefs, and other papers in the
proceeding on behalf of the Director of
Industry Operations, in the attorney’s
own name as ‘‘Attorney for the
Government.’’
Subpart D—Compliance and
Settlement
§ 771.35
Computation.
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60397
Opportunity for compliance.
No license or permit shall be revoked
or denied renewal unless, prior to the
institution of proceedings, facts or
conduct warranting such action shall
have been called to the attention of the
licensee or permittee by the Director of
Industry Operations in writing in a
contemplated notice, and the licensee or
permittee shall have been accorded an
opportunity to demonstrate or achieve
compliance with all lawful
requirements as set forth in section 9(b)
of the Administrative Procedure Act. In
cases in which the Director of Industry
Operations alleges in his contemplated
notice, with supporting reasons, willful
violations or that the public interest
requires otherwise, this section does not
apply and the issuance of a
contemplated notice is unnecessary.
§ 771.36
Settlement.
Any proposals of settlement should be
made to the Director of Industry
Operations, but may be made through
the attorney for the Government. Where
necessary, the date of the hearing may
be postponed pending consideration of
such proposals when they are made in
good faith and not for the purpose of
delay. If proposals of settlement are
submitted, and they are considered
unsatisfactory, the Director of Industry
Operations may reject the proposals and
may, either directly or through the
attorney for the Government, inform the
licensee or permittee of any conditions
on which the alleged violations may be
settled. If the proposals of settlement are
considered satisfactory to the Director of
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
60398
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Industry Operations, the licensee or
permittee shall be notified thereof and
the proceeding shall be dismissed.
notice, the Director of Industry
Operations may proceed with the
revocation or denial of renewal.
§ 771.37
Subpart E—Revocation or Denial
Notice of contemplated action.
Where the Director of Industry
Operations has not ascertained whether
the licensee or permittee has willfully
violated the federal explosives laws and
where he believes the matter has the
potential to be settled informally, i.e.,
without formal administrative
proceedings, he shall, in accordance
with section 5(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act, prior to the issuance of
a notice of revocation or denial of
renewal, give the licensee or permittee
a contemplated notice of such action
and an opportunity to show why the
license or permit should not be revoked
or denied renewal. The notice should
inform the licensee or permittee of the
charges on which the notice would be
based, if issued, and afford him a period
of 15 days from the date of the notice,
or such longer period as the Director of
Industry Operations deems necessary, in
which to submit proposals of settlement
to the Director of Industry Operations.
Where informal settlement is not
reached promptly because of inaction by
the applicant, licensee, or permittee or
proposals are made for the purpose of
delay, a notice shall be issued in
accordance with §§ 771.42 or 771.43, as
appropriate. The issuance of a notice of
contemplated action does not entitle the
recipient to a hearing before an
administrative law judge.
§ 771.38 Licensee’s or permittee’s failure
to meet requirements within reasonable
time.
If the licensee or permittee fails to
meet the requirements of applicable
laws and regulations within such
reasonable time as may be specified by
the Director of Industry Operations,
proceedings for revocation or denial of
renewal of the license or permit shall be
initiated.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 771.39 Authority of Director of Industry
Operations to proceed with revocation or
denial action.
Where the evidence is conclusive and
the nature of the violation is such as to
preclude any settlement, the violation is
of a continuing character that
necessitates immediate action to protect
the public interest, or the Director of
Industry Operations believes that any
informal settlement of the alleged
violation will not ensure future
compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, or in any similar case where
the circumstances are such as to clearly
preclude informal settlement, and the
Director of Industry Operations so finds
and states the reasons therefor in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
§ 771.40
Denial of initial application.
Whenever the Director of Industry
Operations has reason to believe that an
applicant for an original license or
permit is not eligible to receive a license
or permit under the provisions of
§ 555.49 of this chapter, the Director of
Industry Operations shall issue a notice
of denial on ATF Form 5400.11 (Notice
of Denial of Application for License or
Permit) (F 5400.11). The notice will set
forth the matters of fact and law relied
upon in determining that the
application should be denied and will
afford the applicant 15 days from the
date of receipt of the notice in which to
request a hearing to review the denial.
If no request for a hearing is filed within
that time, a copy of the application,
marked ‘‘Disapproved,’’ will be returned
to the applicant.
§ 771.41 Denial of renewal application or
revocation of license or permit.
If, following the opportunity for
compliance under § 555.71 of this
chapter, or without opportunity for
compliance under § 555.71 of this
chapter as circumstances warrant, the
Director of Industry Operations finds
that the licensee or permittee is not
likely to comply with applicable laws or
regulations or is otherwise not eligible
to continue operations authorized under
his license or permit, the Director of
Industry Operations shall issue a notice
of denial of the renewal application or
revocation of the license or permit, ATF
F 5400.11 (Notice of Denial of
Application for License or Permit) or
ATF Form 5400.10 (Notice of
Revocation of License or Permit) (F
5400.10), as appropriate. The notice will
set forth the matters of fact constituting
the violations specified, dates, places,
and the sections of law and regulations
violated. In the case of the revocation of
a license or permit, the notice will
specify the date on which the action is
effective, which date will be on or after
the date the notice is served on the
licensee or permittee. The notice will
also advise the licensee or permittee
that he may, within 15 days after receipt
of the notice, request a hearing and, if
applicable, a stay of the effective date of
the revocation of his license or permit.
§ 771.42 Grounds for revocation of
licenses or permits.
Whenever the Director of Industry
Operations has reason to believe that
any holder of a license or permit has
willfully violated any provision of 18
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
U.S.C. Chapter 40 or the regulations
prescribed thereunder or has become
ineligible to continue operations
authorized under the license or permit,
the Director of Industry Operations shall
issue a notice for the revocation of such
license or permit, as the case may be.
§ 771.43 Grounds for denial of
applications for licenses or permits.
If, upon examination of any
application (including a renewal
application) for a license or permit, the
Director of Industry Operations has
reason to believe that the applicant is
not entitled to such license or permit,
the Director of Industry Operations shall
issue a denial of the application. An
applicant is not eligible for a license or
permit if he fails to meet the
requirements of 18 U.S.C. 843(b) and
§ 555.49 of this chapter.
Subpart F—Hearing Procedure
Notices
§ 771.55
Content.
(a) Notices for the revocation or denial
of renewal of a license or permit shall
be promptly issued by the Director of
Industry Operations and shall set forth:
(1) The sections of law and
regulations relied upon for authority
and jurisdiction;
(2) The specific grounds upon which
the revocation or denial is based, i.e.,
the matters of fact constituting the
violations specified, dates, places, and
sections of law and regulations violated;
(3) In the case of a revocation, the date
on which the action is effective; and
(4) That the licensee or permittee has
15 days from receipt of the notice
within which to request a hearing before
an administrative law judge.
(b) Notices for the denial of an initial
application for a license or permit shall
set forth:
(1) The sections of law and
regulations relied upon for authority
and jurisdiction;
(2) The specific grounds upon which
the denial is based, i.e., the matters of
fact and law relied upon for the
disapproval of the application; and
(3) That the application will be
disapproved unless a hearing is
requested within 15 days from receipt of
the Notice.
§ 771.56
Forms.
Notices shall be issued on the
following forms:
(a) ATF Form 5400.9, ‘‘Order After
Denial or Revocation Hearing,’’ for all
revocations or denials of renewal of
licenses or permits pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Chapter 40 after a hearing has
been held and a Recommended Decision
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
has been issued by the administrative
law judge;
(b) Form 5400.10, ‘‘Notice of
Revocation for License or Permit,’’ for
all revocations of licenses or permits
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40, except
as provided for in paragraph (a) of this
section;
(c) Form 5400.11, ‘‘Notice of Denial of
Application for License or Permit,’’ for
the denial of renewal or original
applications for licenses or permits
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40, except
as provided for in paragraph (a) of this
section;
(d) Form 5400.12, ‘‘Notice of
Contemplated Denial or Revocation of
License or Permit,’’ for the
contemplated revocation or denial of
renewal application of licenses or
permits pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Chapter
40; or
(e) Such other forms as the Director
may prescribe.
§ 771.57
Execution and disposition.
A signed original of the applicable
form shall be served on the licensee or
permittee. If a hearing is requested, a
copy shall be sent to the administrative
law judge designated to conduct the
hearing. Any remaining copies shall be
retained for the office of the Director of
Industry Operations.
§ 771.58
Designated place of hearing.
The designated place of hearing shall
be determined by the administrative law
judge, taking into consideration the
convenience and necessity of the parties
and their representatives.
Request for Hearing
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 771.59
Initial application proceedings.
(a) If the applicant for an initial
license or permit desires a hearing, he
shall file a request in writing with the
Director of Industry Operations within
15 days after receipt of notice of the
disapproval, in whole or in part, of the
application. The request should include
a statement of the reasons for a hearing.
(b) On receipt of the request, the
Director of Industry Operations shall
forward a copy of the request, together
with a copy of the notice, to the Office
of Chief Counsel for the assignment of
an administrative law judge.
(c) After the Office of Chief Counsel
notifies the Director of Industry
Operations or the attorney for the
Government of the assignment of an
administrative law judge, the Director of
Industry Operations shall notify the
licensee or permittee of the assignment.
§ 771.60 Revocation or denial of renewal
proceedings.
(a) If the licensee or permittee desires
a hearing, he shall file a request, in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
writing, with the Director of Industry
Operations within 15 days after receipt
of the notice or within such time as the
Director of Industry Operations may
allow.
(b) Where a licensee or permittee
requests a hearing, the Director of
Industry Operations shall forward a
copy of the request, together with a copy
of the notice, to the Office of Chief
Counsel for the assignment of an
administrative law judge.
(c) After the Office of Chief Counsel
notifies the Director of Industry
Operations or the attorney for the
Government of the assignment of an
administrative law judge, the Director of
Industry Operations shall notify the
licensee or permittee of the assignment.
(d) In the case of a revocation, a
licensee or permittee may include a
request for a stay of the effective date of
revocation with the request for a
hearing.
(e) On receipt of a request for a stay
of the effective date of a revocation, the
Director of Industry Operations shall
timely advise the licensee or permittee
whether the stay is granted.
(1) If the stay is granted, the matter
shall be referred to an administrative
law judge pursuant to paragraph (b) of
this section.
(2) If the stay is denied, the licensee
or permittee may request an immediate
hearing. In this event, the Director of
Industry Operations shall immediately
refer the matter to the Office of Chief
Counsel for the assignment of an
administrative law judge, who shall set
a date and place for hearing, which date
shall be no later than 10 days from the
date the licensee or permittee requested
the immediate hearing.
§ 771.61
Notice of hearing.
Once a request for a hearing has been
referred to the administrative law judge,
the administrative law judge shall set a
time and place for a hearing and shall
serve notice thereof upon the parties at
least 10 days in advance of the hearing
date.
Non-Request for Hearing
§ 771.62
Initial application.
In the case of an initial application, if
the applicant does not request a hearing
within 15 days, or within such
additional time as the Director of
Industry Operations may in his
discretion allow, the Director of
Industry Operations will return a copy
of the application, marked
‘‘Disapproved,’’ to the applicant,
accompanied by a brief statement
including the findings upon which the
denial is based.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 771.63
60399
Revocation or denial of renewal.
In the case of a revocation or denial
of renewal of an application, if the
licensee or permittee does not request a
hearing within 15 days, or within such
additional time as the Director of
Industry Operations may in his
discretion allow, the Director of
Industry Operations shall make the
initial decision in the case pursuant to
§ 771.78(b).
Responses to Notices
§ 771.64
Answers.
(a) Where the licensee or permittee
requests a hearing in accordance with
§ 771.60 of this chapter, a written
response to the relevant notice may be
filed with the administrative law judge
and served on the Director of Industry
Operations within 15 days after the
licensee or permittee receives service of
the designation of the administrative
law judge.
(b) Where no hearing is requested, the
licensee or permittee may file a written
answer to the relevant notice with the
Director of Industry Operations within
15 days after service of the notice.
(c) An answer shall contain a concise
statement of the facts that constitute the
grounds for defense. A hearing, if
requested, may be limited to the issues
contained in the notice and the answer.
The administrative law judge or Director
of Industry Operations, as the case may
be, may, as a matter of discretion, waive
any requirement of this section.
(d) Answers need not be filed in
initial application proceedings.
§ 771.65
Responses admitting facts.
If the licensee or permittee desires to
waive the hearing on the allegations of
fact set forth in the notice and does not
contest the facts, the answer may consist
of a statement that the licensee or
permittee admits all material allegations
of fact charged in the notice to be true.
The Director of Industry Operations
shall base the decision on the notice and
such answer, although such an answer
shall not affect the licensee’s or
permittee’s right to submit proposed
findings of fact and conclusions of law
or right to appeal.
§ 771.66
Initial conferences.
(a) In any proceeding, the
administrative law judge, upon his own
motion or upon the motion of one of the
parties or their qualified representatives,
may in the administrative law judge’s
discretion direct the parties or their
qualified representatives to appear at a
specified time and place for a
conference to consider:
(1) Simplification of the issues;
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
60400
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(2) The necessity of amendments to
the pleadings;
(3) The possibility of obtaining
stipulations, admissions of facts, and
documents;
(4) The possibility of both parties
exchanging information or scheduling
discovery;
(5) A date on which both parties will
simultaneously submit lists of proposed
hearing exhibits;
(6) Limiting the number of expert
witnesses;
(7) Identifying and, if practicable,
scheduling all witnesses to be called;
however, there is no requirement in
these proceedings for the parties to
submit pre-hearing statements or
statements of proposed testimony by
witnesses; and
(8) Such other matters as may aid in
the disposition of the proceeding.
(b) As soon as practicable after such
conference, the administrative law judge
shall issue an order that recites the
action taken, the amendments allowed
to the pleadings, and the agreements
made by the parties or their qualified
representatives as to any of the matters
considered. The order shall also limit
the issues for hearing to those not
disposed of by admission or agreement.
Such order shall control the subsequent
course of the proceedings, unless
modified for good cause by a subsequent
order. After discovery is complete, the
order may be amended or supplemented
if necessary.
Failure to Appear
§ 771.67
Initial applications.
Where the applicant on an initial
application for a license or permit has
requested a hearing and does not appear
at the appointed time and place,
evidence has not been offered to refute
or explain the grounds upon which
disapproval of the application is
contemplated, and no good cause has
been shown for the failure to appear, the
applicant shall be considered to have
waived the hearing. When such waiver
occurs, a default judgment against the
applicant will be entered and the
administrative law judge shall
recommend disapproval of said
application.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 771.68
Revocation or denial of renewal.
If, on the date set for a hearing
concerning the revocation or denial of
renewal of a license or permit, the
licensee or permittee does not appear,
no evidence has been offered, and no
good cause has been shown for the
failure to appear, the attorney for the
Government will proceed ex parte and
offer for the record sufficient evidence
to make a prima facie case. At such
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
hearing, documents, statements, and
affidavits may be submitted in lieu of
testimony of witnesses.
Waiver of Hearing
§ 771.69
Withdrawal of request for hearing.
At any time prior to the assignment of
an administrative law judge, the
licensee or permittee may, by filing
written notice with the Director of
Industry Operations, withdraw his
request for a hearing. If such a notice is
filed after assignment to the
administrative law judge and prior to
issuance of his recommended decision
the Director of Industry Operations shall
move the administrative law judge to
dismiss the proceedings as moot. If such
a notice is filed either after issuance of
a notice of denial or notice of revocation
and before assignment of the
administrative law judge, or after
issuance by the administrative law
judge of his recommended decision and
prior to the Director of Industry
Operations’ order disapproving the
application or denying the renewal of or
revoking the license or permit, the
Director of Industry Operations shall, by
order, dismiss the proceeding.
§ 771.70 Adjudication based upon written
submissions.
The licensee or permittee may waive
the hearing before the administrative
law judge and stipulate that the matter
will be adjudicated by the Director of
Industry Operations based upon written
submissions. Written submissions may
include stipulations of law or facts,
proposed findings of fact and
conclusions of law, briefs, or any other
documentary material. The pleadings,
together with the written submissions of
both the licensee or permittee and the
attorney for the Government, shall
constitute the record on which the
initial decision shall be based. The
election to contest the denial or
revocation without a hearing under this
section does not affect the licensee’s or
permittee’s right to appeal to the
Director pursuant to § 555.79 of this
chapter or to the United States Court of
Appeals for the district in which the
licensee or permittee resides or has his
principle place of business pursuant to
§ 555.80 of this chapter.
Surrender of License or Permit
§ 771.71
Before citation.
If a licensee or permittee surrenders
the license or permit before the notice
of revocation or denial of renewal, the
Director of Industry Operations may
accept the surrender. But if the
evidence, in the opinion of the Director
of Industry Operations, warrants
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
issuance of a notice for revocation or
denial of renewal, the surrender shall be
refused and the Director of Industry
Operations shall issue the notice.
§ 771.72
After citation.
If a licensee or permittee surrenders
the license or permit after notice, but
prior to the referral to an administrative
law judge and prior to an initial
decision, the Director of Industry
Operations may accept the surrender of
the license or permit and dismiss the
proceeding as moot. If a licensee or
permittee surrenders the license or
permit after notice and after the referral
to the administrative law judge, but
prior to the issuance of a recommended
decision, the Director of Industry
Operations may accept the surrender of
the license or permit and shall move the
administrative law judge to dismiss the
proceedings as moot. In either case, if,
in the opinion of the Director of
Industry Operations, the evidence is
such as to warrant revocation or denial
of renewal, as the case may be, the
surrender of the license or permit shall
be refused, and the proceeding shall
continue.
Motions
§ 771.73
General.
All motions shall be made and
addressed to the administrative law
judge before whom the proceeding is
pending, and copies of all motion
papers shall be served upon the other
party or parties. The administrative law
judge may dispose of any motion
without oral argument, but he may, if he
so desires, set it down for hearing and
request argument. The administrative
law judge may dispose of such motion
prior to the hearing on the merits or he
may postpone the disposition until the
hearing on the merits. No appeal may be
taken from any ruling on a motion until
the whole record is certified for review.
Examples of typical motions may be
found in the Rules of Civil Procedure
referred to in § 771.2.
§ 771.74
Prior to hearing.
All motions that should be made prior
to the hearing, such as a motion directed
to the sufficiency of the pleadings or of
preliminary orders, shall be filed in
writing with the Director of Industry
Operations or the administrative law
judge if the matter has been referred to
him, and shall briefly state the order or
relief applied for and the grounds for
such motion.
§ 771.75
At hearing.
Motions at the hearing may be made
in writing to the administrative law
judge or stated orally on the record.
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Hearing
§ 771.76
General.
If a hearing is requested, it shall be
held at the time and place stated in the
notice of hearing unless otherwise
ordered by the administrative law judge.
§ 771.77
Initial applications.
(a) The administrative law judge who
presides at the hearing on initial
applications shall recommend a
decision to the Director of Industry
Operations. The administrative law
judge shall certify the complete record
of the proceedings before him and shall
immediately forward the complete
certified record to the Director of
Industry Operations. The administrative
law judge shall also send one copy of
his recommended decision to the
applicant or the applicant’s
representative, one copy to the attorney
for the Government, and one copy to the
Director of Industry Operations, who
shall make the initial decision as
provided in § 771.107. The applicant
may be directed by the Director of
Industry Operations to produce such
records as may be deemed necessary for
examination. All hearings on
applications shall be open to the public
subject to such restrictions and
limitations as may be consistent with
orderly procedure.
(b) If no hearing is requested, the
return of the application marked
‘‘Disapproved’’ is the Director of
Industry Operations’ initial decision.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 771.78
Revocation or denial of renewal.
(a) The administrative law judge who
presides at the hearing in proceedings
for the revocation or denial of renewal
of licenses or permits shall make a
recommended decision to the Director
of Industry Operations. The
administrative law judge shall certify
the complete record of the proceedings
before him and shall immediately
forward the complete certified record to
the Director of Industry Operations. The
administrative law judge shall also send
one copy of his recommended decision
to the licensee or permittee or the
licensee’s or permittee’s representative,
one copy to the attorney for the
Government, and one copy to the
Director of Industry Operations, who
shall make the initial decision as
provided in § 771.109.
(b) If no hearing is requested, the
Director of Industry Operations shall
make the initial decision.
Burden of Proof
§ 771.79
Initial applications.
In hearings on the initial denial of
applications, the burden of proof is on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
the Government to show by a
preponderance of the evidence that the
Director of Industry Operations had
reason to believe that the applicant is
not entitled to a permit or license.
§ 771.80
Revocation or denial of renewal.
In hearings on the revocation or
denial of renewal of a license or permit,
the burden of proof is on the
Government to show that the Director of
Industry Operations had reason to
believe that the licensee or permittee is
not entitled to a permit or license, as
may be the case. The Government must
meet this proof by a preponderance of
the evidence.
General
§ 771.81
Stipulations at hearing.
If there has been no initial conference
under § 771.66, the administrative law
judge may at the beginning of the
hearing require that the parties attempt
to arrive at such stipulations as will
eliminate the necessity of taking
evidence with respect to allegations of
fact about which there is no substantial
dispute. The administrative law judge
should take similar action, where
appropriate, throughout the hearing and
should call and conduct any
conferences that he deems advisable
with a view to the simplification,
clarification, and disposition of any of
the issues involved in the hearing.
§ 771.82
Evidence.
Any relevant evidence that would be
admissible under the rules of evidence
governing civil proceedings in matters
not involving trial by jury in the Courts
of the United States shall be admissible.
The administrative law judge may relax
such rules in any hearing when in his
judgment such relaxation would not
impair the rights of either party and
would more speedily conclude the
hearing or would better serve the ends
of justice. However, the administrative
law judge shall provide for the
exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, or
unduly repetitious evidence. Every
party shall have the right to present his
case or defense by oral or documentary
evidence, depositions, or duly
authenticated copies of records and
documents; to submit rebuttal evidence;
and to conduct such reasonable crossexamination as may be required for a
full and true disclosure of the facts.
(a) Witnesses. The administrative law
judge shall have the right in his
discretion to limit the number of
witnesses whose testimony may be
merely cumulative and shall, as a matter
of policy, not only exclude irrelevant,
immaterial, or unduly repetitious
evidence but shall also limit the cross-
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60401
examination of witnesses to that
required for a full and true disclosure of
the facts so as not to unnecessarily
prolong the hearing and unduly burden
the record. Opinion testimony shall be
admitted when the administrative law
judge is satisfied that the witness is
properly qualified as defined by Federal
Rule of Evidence 701.
(b) Documentary Evidence. Material
and relevant evidence shall not be
excluded because it is not the best
evidence unless its authenticity is
challenged, in which case reasonable
time shall be given to establish its
authenticity. When only portions of a
document are to be relied upon, the
offering party shall prepare the
pertinent excerpts, adequately
identified, and shall supply copies of
such excerpts, together with a statement
indicating the purpose for which such
materials will be offered, to the
administrative law judge and to the
other parties. Only the excerpts, so
prepared and submitted, shall be
received in the record. However, the
whole of the original document should
be made available for examination and
for use by opposing counsel for
purposes of cross-examination.
Compilations, charts, summaries of
data, and photostatic copies of
documents may be admitted in evidence
if the proceedings will thereby be
expedited, and if the material upon
which they are based is available for
examination by the parties. Objections
to the evidence shall be in short form,
stating the grounds relied upon. The
transcript shall not include argument or
debate on objections, except as ordered
by the administrative law judge, but
shall include the rulings thereon. Where
official notice is taken of a material fact
not appearing in the evidence in the
record, any party shall, on timely
request, be afforded an opportunity to
controvert such fact.
(c) Hearsay. Probative, material, and
reliable hearsay evidence is admissible
in proceedings under this subpart.
§ 771.83 Closing of hearings; arguments,
briefs, and proposed findings.
Before closing a hearing, the
administrative law judge shall inquire of
each party whether the party has any
further evidence to offer, which inquiry
and the response thereto shall be shown
in the record. The administrative law
judge may hear arguments of counsel
and the administrative law judge may
limit the time of such arguments at his
discretion. The administrative law judge
may, in his discretion, allow briefs to be
filed on behalf of either party but shall
closely limit the time within which the
briefs for both parties shall be filed, so
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
60402
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
as to avoid unreasonable delay. The
administrative law judge shall also
ascertain whether the parties desire to
submit proposed findings and
conclusions, together with supporting
reasons, and, if so, a period of not more
than 15 days (unless extended by the
administrative law judge)—after the
close of the hearing or receipt of a copy
of the record, if one is requested—will
be allowed for such purpose.
§ 771.84
Reopening of the hearing.
The Director, the Director of Industry
Operations, or the administrative law
judge, as the case may be, may, as to all
matters pending before him, in his
discretion reopen a hearing—
(a) In case of default under §§ 771.67
or 771.68 where the applicant, licensee,
or permittee failed to request a hearing
or to appear after one was set, upon
petition setting forth reasonable grounds
for such failure, and
(b) Where any party desires leave to
adduce additional evidence upon
petition summarizing such evidence,
establishing its materiality, and stating
reasonable grounds why such party with
due diligence was unable to produce
such evidence at the hearing.
Record of Testimony
§ 771.85
Stenographic record.
A stenographic record shall be made
of the testimony and proceedings,
including stipulations, admissions of
fact, and arguments of counsel in all
proceedings. A transcript of the
evidence and proceedings at the hearing
shall be made in all cases.
§ 771.86
Oath of reporter.
The reporter making the stenographic
record shall subscribe an oath before the
administrative law judge, to be filed in
the record of the case, that he will truly
and correctly report the oral testimony
and proceedings at such hearing and
accurately transcribe the same to the
best of his ability.
Subpart G—Administrative Law
Judges
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 771.95 Responsibilities of administrative
law judges.
Administrative law judges shall be
under the administrative control of the
Director. In hearings under this subpart,
administrative law judges must apply
all governing agency rulings and
governing agency precedent. They shall
be responsible for the conduct of
hearings and shall render their
decisions as soon as is reasonably
possible after the hearing is closed.
Administrative law judges shall also be
responsible for the preparation,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
certification, and forwarding of the
complete record of proceedings and the
administrative work relating thereto
and, by arrangement with Directors of
Industry Operations and representatives
of the Office of Chief Counsel shall have
access to facilities and temporary use of
personnel at such times and places as
are needed in the prompt dispatch of
official business.
§ 771.96
Disqualification.
An administrative law judge shall, at
any time, withdraw from any
proceeding if he deems himself
disqualified. Upon the filing in good
faith by the applicant, licensee,
permittee, or attorney for the
Government of a timely and sufficient
affidavit of facts showing personal bias
or otherwise warranting the
disqualification of any administrative
law judge, if the administrative law
judge fails to disqualify himself, the
Director shall upon appeal, as provided
in § 771.120, determine the matter as a
part of the record and decision in the
proceeding. If the Director decides the
administrative law judge should have
deemed himself disqualified, the
Director will remand the record for
hearing de novo before another
administrative law judge. If the Director
should decide against the
disqualification of the administrative
law judge, the proceeding will be
reviewed on its merits by the original
administrative law judge. The burden is
upon the party seeking disqualification
to set forth evidence sufficient to
overcome the presumption of the
administrative law judge’s honesty and
integrity.
§ 771.97
Powers.
Administrative law judges shall have
authority to:
(a) Administer oaths and affirmations;
(b) Issue subpoenas as authorized by
law;
(c) Rule upon offers of proof and
receive relevant evidence;
(d) Take or cause depositions to be
taken whenever the ends of justice
would be served thereby;
(e) Regulate the course of the hearing;
(f) Hold conferences for the settlement
or simplification of the issues by
consent of the parties;
(g) Require the attendance at such
conferences of at least one
representative of each party who has the
authority to negotiate concerning
resolution of issues in controversy;
(h) Dispose of procedural requests or
similar matters;
(i) Render recommended decisions in
proceedings on applications for licenses
and permits and on revocation or denial
of renewal of licenses or permits;
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(j) Call, examine, and cross-examine
witnesses, including hostile or adverse
witnesses, when the administrative law
judge deems such action to be necessary
to a just disposition of the case, and
introduce into the record documentary
or other evidence; and
(k) Take any other action authorized
by rule of the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
consistent with the Administrative
Procedure Act.
§ 771.98
Separation of functions.
Administrative law judges shall
perform no functions inconsistent with
their duties and responsibilities. The
Director may assign administrative law
judges duties not inconsistent with the
performance of their functions as
administrative law judges. Except to the
extent required for the disposition of ex
parte matters as required by law, no
administrative law judge shall consult
any person or party as to any fact in
issue unless there has been notice and
opportunity for all parties to participate.
The functions of the administrative law
judge shall be entirely separated from
the general investigative functions of the
agency. No officer, employee, or agent
engaged in the performance of
investigative or prosecuting functions in
any proceeding shall, in that proceeding
or a factually related proceeding,
participate or advise in the
administrative law judge’s or Director’s
decision, or in the agency review on
appeal, except as a witness or counsel
in the proceedings. The administrative
law judge may not informally obtain
advice or opinions from the parties or
their counsel, or from any officer or
employee of the ATF, as to the facts or
the weight or interpretation to be given
to the evidence. The administrative law
judge may, however, informally obtain
advice on matters of law or procedure
in a proceeding from officers or
employees who were not engaged in the
performance of investigative or
prosecuting functions in that proceeding
or a factually related proceeding. The
administrative law judge may, at any
time, consult with and obtain
instructions from the Director on
questions of law and policy.
Furthermore, it is not a violation of the
separation of functions for the
administrative law judge to participate
in the questioning of witnesses, where
the questioning is for clarification or to
move the proceedings along, and where
the questioning is not so extensive as to
place the administrative law judge in
the position of a prosecuting officer.
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
§ 771.99
Conduct of hearing.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
The administrative law judge is
charged with the duty of conducting a
fair and impartial hearing and of
maintaining order in form and manner
consistent with the dignity of a court
proceeding. In the event that counsel or
any person or witness in any proceeding
shall refuse to obey the orders of the
administrative law judge, or be guilty of
disorderly or contemptuous language or
conduct in connection with any hearing,
the administrative law judge may, for
good cause stated in the record, suspend
the hearing, and, in the case of
disorderly or contemptuous language or
conduct by an attorney, recommend that
the Director report the matter to the
Chief Counsel regarding the attorney for
the Government or the applicable state
bar association regarding the attorney
for a licensee or permittee for
disciplinary action. The refusal of a
witness to answer any question that has
been ruled to be proper shall be
considered by the administrative law
judge in determining the weight to be
given all the testimony of that witness.
credibility and demeanor of the
witnesses); and
(c) The administrative law judge’s
recommended determination as to the
revocation or denial at issue.
§ 771.106 Certification and transmittal of
record and decision.
After reaching his decision, the
administrative law judge shall certify
the complete record of the proceeding
before him and shall immediately
forward the complete certified record
together with one copy of the
administrative law judge’s
recommended decision to the Director
of Industry Operations for initial
decision, one copy of the recommended
decision to the applicant or the
applicant’s representative, and one copy
of the recommended decision to the
attorney for the Government.
Action by Director of Industry
Operations
§ 771.107
Initial application proceedings.
(a) Accepting the recommended
decision. If the Director of Industry
Operations, after consideration of the
record of the hearing and of any
§ 771.100 Unavailability of administrative
proposed findings, conclusions, or
law judge.
exceptions filed with him by the
In the event that the administrative
applicant, accepts the recommended
law judge designated to conduct a
decision of the administrative law
hearing becomes unavailable before the
judge, the Director of Industry
filing of his findings and recommended
Operations shall by order approve or
decision, the Director may assign the
case to another administrative law judge disapprove of the application in
accordance with the recommended
for the continuance of the proceeding,
decision. If the Director of Industry
in accordance with the regulations in
this part in the same manner as if he had Operations approves the application, he
shall briefly state for the record his
been designated administrative law
reasons therefor. However, if the
judge at the commencement of the
Director of Industry Operations
proceeding.
disapproves of the applications, he shall
serve a copy of the administrative law
Subpart H—Decisions
judge’s recommended decision on the
§ 771.105 Administrative law judge’s
applicant, informing the applicant of the
findings and recommended decision.
Director of Industry Operations’
Within a reasonable time after the
contemplated action and affording the
conclusion of the hearing, and as
applicant not more than 10 days in
expeditiously as possible, the
which to submit proposed findings and
administrative law judge shall render
conclusions or exceptions to the
his recommended decision. All
recommended decision with reasons in
decisions shall become a part of the
support thereof.
(b) Rejecting the recommended
record and, if proposed findings and
conclusions have been filed, shall show decision. If, after such consideration
referenced in paragraph (a) of this
the administrative law judge’s ruling
section, the Director of Industry
upon each of such proposed findings
and conclusions. Decisions shall consist Operations rejects the recommended
decision of the administrative law
of:
judge, in whole or in part, the Director
(a) A brief statement of the issues of
of Industry Operations shall by order
fact involved in the proceeding;
make such findings and conclusions as
(b) The administrative law judge’s
findings and conclusions, as well as the in his opinion are warranted by the law
and facts in the record. Any decision of
reasons or basis therefor with record
the Director of Industry Operations
references, upon all the material issues
ordering the disapproval of an
of fact, law, or discretion presented on
application for a permit shall state the
the record (including, when
findings and conclusions upon which it
appropriate, comment as to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60403
is based, including his ruling upon each
proposed finding, conclusion, and
exception to the administrative law
judge’s recommended decision, together
with a statement of the administrative
law judge’s findings, conclusions, and
reasons or basis therefor, upon all
material issues of fact, law, or discretion
presented on the record. A signed
original of the decision of the Director
of Industry Operations shall be served
upon the applicant and the original
copy containing a certificate of service
shall be placed in the official record of
the proceeding.
§ 771.108
decision.
Director of Industry Operations’
When the Director of Industry
Operations issues an initial decision in
accordance with §§ 771.77 or 771.107
the decision shall become a part of the
record. The decision shall consist of:
(a) A brief statement of the issues
involved in the proceedings;
(b) The Director of Industry
Operations’ findings and conclusions, as
well as the reasons therefor; and
(c) The Director of Industry
Operations’ determination on the
record.
§ 771.109 Revocation or denial of renewal
proceedings.
(a) Accepting the recommended
decision. After consideration of the
complete certified record of the hearing,
if the Director of Industry Operations
agrees with the recommended decision
of the administrative law judge, the
Director of Industry Operations shall
enter an order revoking or denying the
renewal of the license or permit or
dismissing the proceedings in
accordance with the administrative law
judge’s recommended decision.
(b) Rejecting the recommended
decision. After consideration of the
complete certified record of the hearing,
if the Director of Industry Operations
disagrees with the recommended
decision of the administrative law
judge, he may file a petition with the
Director for review of the recommended
decision, as provided in § 771.120. If the
Director of Industry Operations files
such a petition, he shall withhold
issuance of the order pending the
decision of the Director, upon receipt of
which he shall issue the order in
accordance with the Director’s decision.
A signed original of the order of the
Director of Industry Operations shall be
served upon the licensee or permittee or
his representative and the original copy
containing a certificate of service shall
be placed in the official record of the
proceeding.
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
60404
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(c) In a case where the initial decision
is made by the Director of Industry
Operations in accordance with
§ 771.78(b), the Director of Industry
Operations shall also issue an order
revoking or denying the renewal of the
license or permit, or dismissing the
proceedings in accordance with his
initial decision. A signed original of the
decision and order of the Director of
Industry Operations shall be served
upon the licensee or permittee or his
representative and the original copy
placed in the official record of the
proceeding.
§ 771.110
Revocation or denial of renewal.
Pursuant to § 771.109(a), when the
Director of Industry Operations issues
an order revoking or denying the
renewal of a license or permit, he shall
furnish a copy of the order and of the
recommended decision on which it is
based to the Director. Should such order
be subsequently set aside on review by
the courts, the Director of Industry
Operations will so advise the Director.
§ 771.111 Proceedings involving violations
not within the division of issuance of
license or permit.
In the event violations occurred at a
place not within the field division
where the licensee or permittee is
located, the Director of Industry
Operations of the field division where
the licensee or permittee is located will
take jurisdiction over any proceeding
and will take appropriate action in
accordance with this subpart, including
issuing the relevant notice.
Subpart I—Review
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 771.120
Director.
Appeal on petition to the
(a) An appeal to the Director may be
made by the applicant, licensee, or
permittee, or by the Director of Industry
Operations. For the applicant, licensee,
or permittee, such appeal shall be made
by filing a petition for review on appeal
with the Director within 15 days of the
service of the adverse initial decision by
the Director of Industry Operations. For
the Director of Industry Operations,
such appeal shall be taken by filing a
petition for review on appeal with the
Director within 15 days of the issuance
of the administrative law judge’s
decision recommending against
revocation or denial of renewal. The
petitioning applicant, licensee, or
permittee must submit arguments
showing that the Director of Industry
Operations’ initial decision, and if
applicable the underlying
administrative law judge’s
recommended decision, was without
reasonable warrant in fact or contrary to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 06, 2014
Jkt 235001
law and regulations. The petitioning
DIO must submit arguments showing
the administrative law judge’s
recommended decision was without
reasonable warrant in fact or contrary to
law and regulations. Nothing in these
regulations shall limit the authority of
the Director to review the administrative
law judge’s decision exercising all the
powers that he would have in making
the recommended decision.
(b) A copy of the petition shall be
filed with the Director of Industry
Operations or served on the applicant,
licensee, or permittee, as the case may
be. In the event of an appeal, the
Director of Industry Operations shall
immediately certify and forward the
complete original record, by certified
mail, to the Director, for his
consideration and review.
§ 771.121
Review by Director.
(a) Modification or reversal. On
appeal, the Director shall afford a
reasonable opportunity for the
submission of proposed findings,
conclusions, or exceptions with reasons
in support thereof and an opportunity
for oral argument. The Director may
alter or modify any finding of the
administrative law judge (or of the
Director of Industry Operations as the
case may be) and may affirm, reverse, or
modify the recommended decision of
the administrative law judge, or the
initial decision of the Director of
Industry Operations, or may remand the
case for further hearing, but shall not
consider evidence that is not a part of
the record.
(b) Affirmance. Except in the case of
a remand, when, on appeal, the Director
affirms the initial decision of the
Director of Industry Operations or the
recommended decision of the
administrative law judge, as the case
may be, such decision shall be the
agency’s final decision.
(c) Recusal. Appeals and petitions for
review shall not be decided by the
Director in any proceeding in which the
Director has engaged in an investigation
or prosecution and in such event the
Director shall so state his
disqualification in writing and refer the
record to the Deputy Director for
appropriate action. The Deputy Director
may designate an Assistant Director or
one of the Deputy Director’s principal
aides to consider any proceeding
instead of the Director. The original
copy of the decision on review shall be
placed in the official record of the
proceeding, a signed duplicate original
shall be served upon the applicant,
licensee, or permittee, and a copy shall
be transmitted to the Director of
Industry Operations.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 771.122
Denial of renewal or revocation.
If the Director orders the denial of an
application, a copy of the application
marked ‘‘Disapproved’’ will be returned
to the applicant by the Director of
Industry Operations. If the Director
orders a revocation of a license of
permit, any stay of revocation will be
withdrawn and the revocation will
become effective upon the order of the
Director of Industry Operations. After
the issuance of a denial of a renewal
application or a revocation, and pending
the final determination of a timely
appeal, the licensee or permittee may
continue operations, if at all, pursuant
to § 555.83 of this chapter.
§ 771.123
Court review.
(a) If an applicant, licensee, or
permittee files an appeal in the United
States Court of Appeals for the district
in which he resides or has his principle
place of business, within 60 days after
the receipt of the Director’s decision, the
Director, upon notification that an
appeal has been taken, shall prepare the
record for submission to the court in
accordance with applicable court rules.
(b) If an applicant, licensee, or
permittee does not seek review with the
Director, but instead seeks review
within 60 days after the receipt of the
initial decision of the Director of
Industry Operations pursuant to
§ 771.109, the Director of Industry
Operations, upon notification that an
appeal has been taken, shall prepare the
record for submission to the court in
accordance with applicable court rules.
The Director of Industry Operations
shall notify the Director if such an
appeal is taken.
(c) The Director, or the Director of
Industry Operations, as the case may be,
shall certify the correctness of the
transcript of the record, forward one
copy to the attorney for the Government
in the review of the case, and file the
original record of the proceedings with
the original certificate in the appropriate
United States Court of Appeals.
Subpart J—Miscellaneous
§ 771.124
Depositions.
The administrative law judge may
take or order the taking of depositions
by either party to the proceeding at such
time and place as the administrative law
judge may designate before a person
having the power to administer oaths,
upon application therefor and notice to
the parties to the action. The testimony
shall be reduced to writing by the
person taking the deposition, or a
person under his direction, and the
deposition shall be subscribed by the
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules
deponent unless subscribing thereof is
waived in writing by the parties.
§ 771.125
Witnesses and fees.
Witnesses summoned before the
administrative law judge may be paid
the same fees and mileage that are paid
witnesses in the courts of the United
States, and witnesses whose depositions
are taken and the persons taking the
same shall severally be entitled to the
same fees as are paid for like services in
the courts of the United States. Witness
fees and mileage shall be paid by the
party at whose instance the witnesses
appear and the person taking the
deposition shall be paid by the party at
whose instance the deposition is taken.
§ 771.126
Privileges.
The Administrative Procedure Act, 5
U.S.C. 559, provides that, except as
otherwise required by law, privileges
relating to procedure or evidence apply
equally to agencies and persons.
Therefore, an agency may rely on
judicially-approved privileges to resist
production of its files where
appropriate.
Record
§ 771.135
What constitutes record.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
The transcript of testimony,
pleadings, exhibits, all papers and
requests filed in the proceeding, and all
findings, decisions, and orders, shall
constitute the exclusive record. Where
the decision rests on official notice of
material fact not appearing in the
record, the administrative law judge
shall so state in his findings and any
party shall, on timely request, be
afforded an opportunity to show facts to
the contrary.
§ 771.136
Availability.
A copy of the record shall be available
for inspection or copying by the parties
to the proceedings during business
hours at the office of the administrative
law judge or the Director of Industry
Operations or, pending administrative
review, at the Office of the Director.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 06, 2014
[FR Doc. 2014–23932 Filed 10–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0615; FRL–9916–94–
Region 9]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Placer County
Air Pollution Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Discovery.
The discovery provisions of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are
not controlling with respect to agency
proceedings under this part. However,
fundamental fairness requires a party be
given the opportunity to know what
evidence is offered and a chance to
rebut such evidence. Either party may
petition the administrative law judge for
non-burdensome discovery if the party
can demonstrate that the interests of
justice require disclosure of these
materials.
§ 771.127
Dated: October 1, 2014.
Eric H. Holder, Jr.,
Attorney General.
Jkt 235001
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
revision to the Placer County Air
Pollution Control District (PCAPCD)
portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This
revision concerns oxides of nitrogen
(NOx) emissions from natural gas-fired
water heaters, small boilers, and process
heaters. We are proposing to approve a
local rule to regulate these emission
sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA
or the Act).
DATES: Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by November 6, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2014–0615, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send email
directly to EPA, your email address will
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
60405
be automatically captured and included
as part of the public comment. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at www.regulations.gov
and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105–3901. While all
documents in the docket are listed at
www.regulations.gov, some information
may be publicly available only at the
hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material, large maps), and some may not
be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
4126, law.nicole@epa.gov.
This
proposal addresses the following local
rule: Placer County Air Pollution
Control District Rule 247 Natural GasFired Water Heaters, Small Boilers and
Process Heaters. In the Rules and
Regulations section of this Federal
Register, we are approving this local
rule in a direct final action without
prior proposal because we believe these
SIP revisions are not controversial. If we
receive adverse comments, however, we
will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule and address the
comments in subsequent action based
on this proposed rule.
We do not plan to open a second
comment period, so anyone interested
in commenting should do so at this
time. If we do not receive adverse
comments, no further activity is
planned. For further information, please
see the direct final action.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: September 5, 2014.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2014–23775 Filed 10–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60391-60405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23932]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
27 CFR Parts 478, 555, and 771
[Docket No. ATF 33P; AG Order No. 3469-2014]
RIN 1140-AA40
Rules of Practice in Explosives License and Permit Proceedings
(2007R-5P); Revisions Reflecting Changes Consistent With the Homeland
Security Act of 2002
AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF),
Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice proposes to codify the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) procedures and
practices in connection with the disapproval of initial applications,
denials of renewal, and revocations of explosives licenses or permits.
The proposed regulations will be codified in a new part entitled
``Rules and Practice in License and Permit Proceedings.'' The proposed
regulations are based upon the regulations that ATF relied upon prior
to its transfer from the Department of the Treasury to the Department
of Justice.
Additionally, the Department proposes minor revisions to
regulations governing administrative proceedings related to the denial,
suspension, or revocation of a license, and the imposition of a civil
fine under Federal firearms law to reference regulations under ATF
authority. These proposed revisions remove all references to statutes,
regulations, positions, and other terms that are applicable only to the
Department of the Treasury. These
[[Page 60392]]
revisions reflect ATF's position as a regulatory and enforcement agency
under the Department of Justice and are consistent with the proposed
regulations governing administrative hearing processes for explosives
licenses and permits.
DATES: Written comments must be postmarked and electronic comments must
be submitted on or before January 5, 2015. Commenters should be aware
that the electronic Federal Docket Management System will not accept
comments after midnight Eastern Time on the last day of the comment
period.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, identified by docket number (ATF 33P), by any
of the following methods:
Mail: Denise Brown, Enforcement Programs and Services,
Office of Regulatory Affairs, Mailstop 6N-602, Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, 99 New York Avenue NE., Washington,
DC 20226; ATTN: ATF 33P. Written comments must appear in minimum 12-
point font size (.17 inches), include the sender's mailing address, and
be signed; they may be of any length.
Fax: 202-648-9741.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received will be
posted without change to the Federal eRulemaking portal, https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the ``Public Participation'' heading of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise Brown, Enforcement Programs and
Services, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives, U.S. Department of Justice, 99 New York
Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20226; telephone: (202) 648-7070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Attorney General has delegated to the Director of the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) responsibility for
administering and enforcing title I of the Gun Control Act of 1968
(GCA), Public Law 90-618, as amended, 18 U.S.C. Chapter 44, relating to
commerce in firearms and ammunition; and Title XI, Regulation of
Explosives, of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (OCCA), Public
Law 91-452, as amended, 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40. See 18 U.S.C. 926(a); 18
U.S.C. 843; 28 CFR 0.130. Under the GCA, ATF has the authority to
license applicants, renew licenses, and revoke Federal firearms
licenses. The OCCA, as amended by the Safe Explosives Act, Title XI,
Subtitle C of Public Law 107-296, the Homeland Security Act of 2002
(enacted November 25, 2002), authorizes ATF to provide licenses and
permits to qualified applicants for the acquisition, distribution,
storage, or use of explosive materials and renew or revoke such
licenses and permits.
A. Rules of Practice in Permit Proceedings (27 CFR Part 71)
On November 25, 2002, President George W. Bush signed the Homeland
Security Act of 2002, Public Law 107-296 (the Act), which divided the
regulatory functions of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms
into two separate agencies. The Act renamed the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives and transferred law enforcement and certain regulatory
functions to the Department of Justice. The Act also retained in the
Department of the Treasury (Treasury) certain functions of the former
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. The functions retained by
Treasury became the responsibility of a new Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau (TTB).
As a result of the Act, TTB has all regulatory authority under 27
CFR Part 71 and ATF therefore cannot promulgate new regulations under
this part, although ATF uses the regulations in Part 71 to administer
hearings related to the application and revocation of Federal
explosives licenses and permits.
B. License Proceedings (27 CFR Part 478)
Regulations that implement the provisions of the GCA are set forth
in 27 CFR Part 478. Subpart E of Part 478 relates to proceedings
involving Federal firearms licensees, including the denial, suspension,
or revocation of licenses and the imposition of civil fines.
Specifically, 27 CFR 478.76 provides that an applicant or licensee may
be represented at a hearing for the disapproval of applications for
firearms licenses, for the denial, suspension, or revocation of a
firearms license, or for imposition of a civil fine under federal
firearms law by an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any
other person recognized to practice before ATF as provided in 31 CFR
Part 8, if the representative complies with the applicable practice
requirements of 26 CFR 601.521 through 601.527.
C. License and Permit Proceedings (27 CFR Part 555)
The regulations that implement OCCA procedural and substantive
requirements are found in 27 CFR Part 555. Subpart E of Part 555
relates to proceedings involving Federal explosives licensees and
permittees, including the denial of an initial application, denial of a
renewal, and revocation of a license or permit. Specifically, 27 CFR
555.78 provides that an applicant, licensee, or permittee may be
represented at a hearing for the disapproval of applications for
explosives licenses, and for the denial of renewal or revocation of
such licenses or permits under federal explosives law by an attorney, a
certified public accountant, or any other person recognized to practice
before ATF as provided in 31 CFR Part 8, if the representative complies
with the applicable practice requirements of 26 CFR 601.521 through
601.527.
II. Proposed Rule
A. Creation of new 27 CFR Part 771
The Department proposes revising ATF regulations to add a new part
that implements 18 U.S.C. 843 and 847 relating to the procedures and
practice for the disapproval of initial applications, denials of a
renewal, and revocations of explosives licenses or permits by ATF under
federal explosives law. ATF is incorporating and updating the language
relevant to its operations currently found in Part 71 into proposed 27
CFR Part 771. The creation of Part 771 is primarily an administrative
change that will improve the organization of ATF regulations. The
proposed regulations will be codified in a new part 771 in Chapter II
of title 27 CFR and are separated into subparts as follows:
Subpart A--Scope and Construction
Subpart B--Definitions
Subpart C--General
Subpart D--Compliance and Settlement
Subpart E--Grounds for Revocation or Denial
Subpart F--Hearing Procedure
Subpart G--Administrative Law Judges
Subpart H--Decisions
Subpart I--Review
Subpart J--Miscellaneous
B. Proposed Amendments to 27 CFR Part 478
This proposed rule amends ATF regulations governing procedures and
practices for disapproving applications for firearms licenses; for
denying, suspending, or revoking a firearms license; and for imposing a
civil fine
[[Page 60393]]
under federal firearms law. The proposed rule revises 27 CFR 478.76 to
allow an applicant or licensee to be represented at a proceeding by
himself, an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other
person without submitting a declaration of a representative pursuant to
26 CFR 601.521, and it deletes the current references to 31 CFR Part 8
and 26 CFR 601.521 through 601.527. Under the proposed rule, an
applicant or licensee shall file in the proceeding a duly executed
power of attorney designating his representative. The applicant or
licensee shall also file waivers, if applicable, under the Privacy Act
of 1974 (see 5 U.S.C. 552a), and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c) (confidentiality and
disclosure of returns and return information). The Director of Industry
Operations may be represented in proceedings under Sec. Sec. 478.72
and 478.74 by an attorney for the government in the ATF Office of Chief
Counsel who is authorized to execute and file motions, briefs, and
other papers in the proceeding on behalf of the Director of Industry
Operations in the attorney's own name as ``Attorney for the
Government.''
C. Proposed Amendments to 27 CFR Part 555
This proposed rule amends ATF regulations governing procedures and
practices for disapproving applications, denying renewals, and revoking
explosives licenses or permits under federal explosives law. This
proposed rule amends Sec. 555.73 and Sec. 555.73 to state that the
administrative hearings will be conducted in accordance with the
hearing procedures prescribed in part 771, thereby replacing the
current references in these sections to part 71.
The proposed rule revises 27 CFR 555.78 to allow an applicant,
licensee, or permittee to be represented at a proceeding by himself, an
attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other person without
submitting a declaration of a representative pursuant to 26 CFR
601.521, and it deletes the current references to 31 CFR Part 8 and 26
CFR 601.521 through 601.527. Under the proposed rule, an applicant,
licensee, or permittee shall file in the proceeding a duly executed
power of attorney designating his representative. The applicant,
licensee, or permittee shall also file waivers, if applicable, under
the Privacy Act of 1974 (see 5 U.S.C. 552(a)) and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c)
(confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information). An
attorney for the government may represent the Director of Industry
Operations under Sec. Sec. 555.73 and 555.75 who is authorized to
execute and file motions, briefs, and other papers in the proceeding,
on behalf of the Director of Industry Operations, in the attorney's own
name as ``Attorney for the Government.''
This proposed rule amends Sec. 555.79 to state that, in the event
that an appeal is taken from a decision of a hearing, the process by
which the Director will review the complete original record will be
contained in a new part 771, thereby replacing the current reference in
this section to part 71.
This proposed rule revises Sec. 555.82 to state that regulations
governing the procedures and practices for disapproving applications
for explosives licenses and permits and for denying renewal of or
revoking such licenses and permits are contained in a new Part 771.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866 and 13563
This proposed rule has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' section
1(b), The Principles of Regulation and in accordance with Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' section 1,
General Principles of Regulation, and section 6, Retrospective Analyses
of Existing Rules.
Further, both Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to
assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental,
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both
costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of
promoting flexibility. The Department has assessed the costs and
benefits of this regulation and believes that the regulatory approach
selected maximizes net benefits.
This rule will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, nor will it adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
government or communities. Similarly, it does not create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another agency, materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof, or raise novel legal or policy issues arising out
of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set
forth in Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule is not a
``significant regulatory action'' as defined in Executive Order 12866.
Section 6 of Executive Order 13563, directs agencies to develop a
plan to review existing significant rules that may be ``outmoded,
ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome,'' and to make
appropriate changes where warranted. The Department selected and
reviewed this rule under the criteria set forth in its Plan for
Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules, and determined that this
proposed rule transfers and consolidates regulations governing
explosives license application renewal or revocation of licenses and
permits, improving the enforcement of ATF regulations.
B. Executive Order 13132
This proposed regulation will not have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section
6 of Executive Order 13132, the Attorney General has determined that
this proposed regulation does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact
statement.
C. Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule meets the applicable standards set forth in
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, ``Civil Justice
Reform.''
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)) exempts an agency
from the requirement to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of
any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements if the
agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small entities
include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small
governmental jurisdictions. The Attorney General has reviewed this
proposed rule and, by approving it, certifies that it will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule recodifies the ATF regulations governing the
procedure and practice for disapproving applications, denying renewals,
and revoking explosives licenses or permits under
[[Page 60394]]
federal explosives law in a new part 771 under ATF's regulatory
authority.
Additionally, this proposed rule updates the regulations governing
the denial, suspension, or revocation of a firearms license, and
imposition of a civil fine under federal firearms law to only reference
regulations under ATF authority. This proposed rule also amends the
regulations to require an applicant or licensee in a proceeding
concerning the denial, suspension, or revocation of a firearms license,
or the imposition of a civil fine under federal firearms law, to file a
duly executed power of attorney designating his representative, and
waivers, if applicable, under the Privacy Act of 1974 (See 5 U.S.C.
552(a)), and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c) (confidentiality and disclosure of
returns and return information). This is required in the current
regulations by reference to 31 CFR Part 8 and 26 CFR 601.521 through
601.527. The changes proposed in this rule are purely administrative
and do not add any new requirements that would have any impact on the
economy.
E. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This proposed rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5
U.S.C. 804. This proposed rule will not result in an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or
prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United
States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in
domestic and export markets.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule will not result in the expenditure by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million or more in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose any new reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Public Participation
A. Comments Sought
ATF is requesting comments on the proposed rule from all interested
persons. ATF is also specifically requesting comments on the clarity of
this proposed rule and how it may be made easier to understand.
All comments must reference this document docket number (ATF 33P),
be legible, and include the commenter's name and mailing address. ATF
will treat all comments as originals and will not acknowledge receipt
of comments.
Comments received on or before the closing date will be carefully
considered. Comments received after that date will be given the same
consideration if it is practical to do so, but assurance of
consideration cannot be given except as to comments received on or
before the closing date.
B. Confidentiality
Comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be
made available for public viewing at ATF and on the Internet as part of
the eRulemaking initiative. Comments are subject to the Freedom of
Information Act. Commenters who do not want their names or other
personal identifying information posted on the Internet should submit
their comments by mail or facsimile, along with a separate cover sheet
containing their personal identifying information. Both the cover sheet
and comment must reference this docket number. Information contained in
the cover sheet will not be posted on the Internet. Any personal
identifying information that appears within the comment will be posted
on the Internet and will not be redacted by ATF.
Any material that a commenter considers to be inappropriate for
disclosure to the public should not be included in the comment. Any
person submitting a comment shall specifically designate that portion
(if any) of the comments that contains material that is confidential
under law (e.g., trade secrets, processes, etc.). Any portion of a
comment that is confidential under law shall be set forth on pages
separate from the balance of the comment and shall be prominently
marked ``confidential'' at the top of each page. Confidential
information will be included in the rulemaking record but will not be
disclosed to the public. Any comments containing material that is not
confidential under law may be disclosed to the public. In any event,
the name of the person submitting a comment is not exempt from
disclosure.
C. Submitting Comments
Comments may be submitted in any of three ways:
Mail: Send written comments to the address listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. Written comments may be of any
length, must appear in minimum 12-point font size (.17 inches), and
include the commenter's mailing address and signature.
Facsimile: You may submit comments by facsimile
transmission to (202) 648-9741. Faxed comments must:
(1) Be legible and appear in minimum 12-point font size (.17
inches);
(2) Be on 8\1/2\'' x 11'' paper;
(3) Contain a legible, written signature; and
(4) Be no more than five pages long. ATF will not accept faxed
comments that exceed five pages.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: To submit comments to ATF via
the Federal eRulemaking portal, visit https://www.regulations.gov and
follow the instructions for submitting comments.
D. Request for Hearing
Any interested person who desires an opportunity to comment orally
at a public hearing should submit such request for a hearing, in
writing, to the Director of ATF within the 90-day comment period.
Address requests for public hearings to Denise Brown, Enforcement
Programs and Services, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Mailstop 6N-602,
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, 99 New York
Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20226; ATTN: ATF 33P. The Director, however,
reserves the right to determine, in light of all circumstances, whether
a public hearing is necessary.
Disclosure
Copies of this proposed rule and the comments received will be
available for public inspection by appointment during normal business
hours at: ATF Reading Room, Room 1E-062, 99 New York Avenue NE.,
Washington, DC 20226; telephone: (202) 648-8740.
Drafting Information
The author of this document is Denise Brown; Enforcement Programs
and Services; Office of Regulatory Affairs, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives.
List of Subjects
27 CFR Part 478
Administrative practice and procedure, Arms and munitions, Customs
duties and inspection, Exports, Imports, Intergovernmental relations,
Law enforcement officers, Military personnel, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Research, Seizures and forfeitures,
Transportation.
[[Page 60395]]
27 CFR Part 555
Administrative practice and procedure, Customs duties and
inspection, Explosives, Hazardous substances, Imports, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Safety, Security measures,
Seizures and forfeitures, Transportation, Warehouses.
27 CFR Part 771
Administrative practice and procedure, Explosives.
Authority and Issuance
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed in the preamble, 27 CFR
Parts 478 and 555 are proposed to be amended and Part 771 is proposed
to be added to chapter II, title 27 as follows:
PART 478--COMMERCE IN FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION
0
1. The authority citation for 27 CFR part 478 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 18 U.S.C. 847, 921-931; 44 U.S.C.
3504(h).
0
2. Section 478.76 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 478.76 Representation at a hearing.
Applicants or licensees may represent themselves or be represented
by an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other person,
specifically designated in a duly executed power of attorney that shall
be filed in the proceeding by the applicant or licensee. The applicant
or licensee shall file waivers, if applicable, under the Privacy Act of
1974 and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c) (confidentiality and disclosure of returns
and return information). The Director of Industry Operations may be
represented in proceedings under Sec. Sec. 478.72 and 478.74 by an
attorney in the Office of Chief Counsel who is authorized to execute
and file motions, briefs, and other papers in the proceeding, on behalf
of the Director of Industry Operations, in the attorney's own name as
``Attorney for the Government.''
PART 555--COMMERCE IN EXPLOSIVES
0
3. The authority citation for 27 CFR part 555 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 847.
0
4. Amend Sec. 555.73 by removing ``part 71'' and adding in its place
``part 771''.
0
5. Amend Sec. 555.75 by removing ``part 71'' and adding in its place
``part 771''.
0
6. Revise 555.78 to read as follows:
Sec. 555.78 Representation at a hearing.
An applicant, licensee, or permittee may represent himself, or be
represented by an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other
person, specifically designated in a duly executed power of attorney
that shall be filed in the proceeding by the applicant, licensee, or
permittee. The applicant, licensee, or permittee shall file waivers, if
applicable, under the Privacy Act of 1974 and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c)
(confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information). The
Director of Industry Operations may be represented in proceedings under
Sec. Sec. 555.73 and 555.75 by an attorney in the Office of Chief
Counsel who is authorized to execute and file motions, briefs and other
papers in the proceeding, on behalf of the Director of Industry
Operations, in the attorney's own name as ``Attorney for the
Government.''
0
7. Amend Sec. 555.79 by removing ``part 71'' and adding in its place
``part 771''.
0
8. Revise Sec. 555.82 to read as follows:
Sec. 555.82 Rules of practice in license and permit proceedings.
Regulations governing the procedure and practice for disapproval of
applications for explosives licenses and permits and for the denial of
renewal or revocation of such licenses and permits under the Act are
contained in part 771 of this chapter.
0
9. Add subchapter E (consisting of part 771) to 27 CFR chapter II to
read as follows:
SUBCHAPTER E--EXPLOSIVE LICENSE AND PERMIT PROCEEDINGS
PART 771--RULES OF PRACTICE IN EXPLOSIVE LICENSE AND PERMIT
PROCEEDINGS
Subpart A--Scope and Construction of Regulations
Sec.
771.1 Scope of part.
771.2 Liberal construction.
771.3 Forms prescribed.
Subpart B--Definitions
771.5 Meaning of terms.
Subpart C--General
771.25 Communications and pleadings.
771.26 Service on applicant, licensee, or permittee.
771.27 Service on the Director of Industry Operations or Director.
Time
771.28 Computation.
771.29 Continuances and extensions.
Representation at Hearings
771.30 Personal representation.
771.31 Attorneys and other representatives.
Subpart D--Compliance and Settlement
771.35 Opportunity for compliance.
771.36 Settlement.
771.37 Notice of contemplated action.
771.38 Licensee's or permittee's failure to meet requirements within
reasonable time.
771.39 Authority of Director of Industry Operations to proceed with
revocation or denial action.
Subpart E--Revocation or Denial
771.40 Denial of initial application
771.41 Denial of renewal application or revocation of license or
permit
771.42 Grounds for revocation of licenses or permits.
771.43 Grounds for denial of applications for licenses or permits.
Subpart F--Hearing Procedure
Notices
771.55 Content.
771.56 Forms.
771.57 Execution and disposition.
771.58 Designated place of hearing.
Request for Hearing
771.59 Initial application proceedings.
771.60 Revocation or denial of renewal proceedings.
771.61 Notice of hearing.
Non-Request for Hearing
771.62 Initial application
771.63 Revocation or denial of renewal.
Responses to Notices
771.64 Answers.
771.65 Responses admitting facts.
771.66 Initial conferences.
Failure To Appear
771.67 Initial applications.
771.68 Revocation or denial of renewal.
Waiver of Hearing
771.69 Withdrawal of request for hearing.
771.70 Adjudication based upon written submissions.
Surrender of License or Permit
771.71 Before citation.
771.72 After citation.
Motions
771.73 General.
771.74 Prior to hearing.
771.75 At hearing.
Hearing
771.76 General.
771.77 Initial applications.
771.78 Revocation or denial of renewal.
Burden of Proof
771.79 Initial applications.
771.80 Revocation or denial of renewal.
General
771.81 Stipulations at hearing.
771.82 Evidence.
771.83 Closing of hearings; arguments, briefs, and proposed
findings.
771.84 Reopening of the hearing.
[[Page 60396]]
Record of Testimony
771.85 Stenographic record.
771.86 Oath of reporter.
Subpart G--Administrative Law Judges
771.95 Responsibilities of administrative law judges.
771.96 Disqualification.
771.97 Powers.
771.98 Separation of functions.
771.99 Conduct of hearing.
771.100 Unavailability of administrative law judge.
Subpart H--Decisions
771.105 Administrative law judge's findings and recommended
decision.
771.106 Certification and transmittal of record and decision.
Action by Director of Industry Operations
771.107 Initial application proceedings.
771.108 Director of Industry Operations' decision.
771.109 Revocation or denial of renewal proceedings.
771.110 Revocation or denial of renewal.
771.111 Proceedings involving violations not within the division of
issuance of license or permit.
Subpart I--Review
771.120 Appeal on petition to the Director.
771.121 Review by Director.
771.122 Denial of renewal or revocation.
771.123 Court review.
Subpart J--Miscellaneous
771.124 Depositions.
771.125 Witnesses and fees.
771.126 Discovery.
771.127 Privileges.
Record
771.135 What constitutes record.
771.136 Availability.
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 843, 847.
Subpart A--Scope and Construction of Regulations
Sec. 771.1 Scope of part.
Regulations in this part govern procedures and practices for
disapproving applications for licenses and permits and denying renewal
of or revocation of such licenses or permits under 18 U.S.C. Chapter
40.
Sec. 771.2 Liberal construction.
Regulations in this part shall be liberally construed to secure
just, expeditious, and efficient determination of the issues presented.
The Rules of Civil Procedure for the U.S. District Courts (28 U.S.C.
appendix) are not controlling, but may act as a guide in any situation
not provided for or controlled by this part and shall be liberally
construed or relaxed when necessary.
Sec. 771.3 Forms prescribed.
(a) The Director is authorized to prescribe all forms required by
this part. All of the information called for in each form shall be
furnished as indicated by the headings on the form and the instructions
on or pertaining to the form. In addition, information called for in
each form shall be furnished as required by this part.
(b) Requests for forms should be made to the ATF Distribution
Center or through the ATF Web site at https://www.atf.gov.
Subpart B--Definitions
Sec. 771.5 Meaning of terms.
When used in this part and in forms prescribed under this part,
where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible
with the intent thereof, terms shall have the meaning provided in this
subpart. Words in the plural form shall include the singular, and vice
versa, and words importing the masculine gender shall include the
feminine.
Administrative law judge. The person appointed pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
3105, designated to preside over any administrative proceedings under
this part.
Applicant. Any person who has filed an application for a license or
permit under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40.
Application. Any application for a license or permit under 18
U.S.C. Chapter 40 for operations not covered by an existing license or
permit.
ATF. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives,
Department of Justice.
Attorney for the Government. An attorney in the ATF Office of Chief
Counsel authorized to represent the Director of Industry Operations in
the proceeding.
CFR. The Code of Federal Regulations.
Contemplated notice. Includes any notice contemplating the
revocation or denial of renewal of a license or permit.
Director. The Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives, Department of Justice.
Director of Industry Operations. The principal ATF official in a
Field Operations division responsible for administering regulations in
this part.
Ex parte communication. An oral or written communication not on the
public record with respect to which reasonable prior notice to all
parties is not given, but not including requests for status reports.
Initial decision. The decision of the Director of Industry
Operations in a proceeding concerning the revocation of, denial of
renewal of, or denial of application for a license or permit. This
decision becomes the agency's final decision in the absence of an
appeal.
Final decision. The definitive decision of ATF, e.g., the agency's
decision in the absence of an appeal or the Director's decision
following an appeal to the Director.
License. Subject to applicable law, entitles the licensee to
transport, ship, and receive explosive materials in interstate or
foreign commerce, and to engage in the business specified by the
license, at the location described on the license.
Licensee. Any importer, manufacturer, or dealer licensed under the
provisions of 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40 and 27 CFR Part 555.
Limited permit. A permit issued to a person authorizing him to
receive for his use explosive materials from a licensee or permittee in
his State of residence on no more than six occasions during the 12-
month period in which the permit is valid. A limited permit does not
authorize the receipt or transportation of explosive materials in
interstate or foreign commerce.
Other term. Any other term defined in the Federal explosives laws
(18 U.S.C. Chapter 40), the regulations promulgated thereunder (27 CFR
Part 555), or the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.),
where used in this part, shall have the meaning assigned to it therein.
Permittee. Any user of explosives for a lawful purpose who has
obtained either a user permit or a limited permit under 18 U.S.C.
Chapter 40 and 27 CFR Part 555.
Person. Any individual, corporation, association, firm,
partnership, society, or joint stock company.
Recommended decision. The advisory decision of the administrative
law judge in any proceeding regarding the revocation of, denial of
renewal of, or denial of application for a license or permit. ATF must
act on a recommended decision with its own initial or final decision.
User-limited permit. A user permit valid only for a single purchase
transaction. Recipients of a user-limited permit must obtain a new
permit for any subsequent purchase transaction.
User permit. A permit issued to a person authorizing him to--
(1) Acquire for his own use explosive materials from a licensee in
a State other than the State in which he resides or from a foreign
country, and;
(2) Transport explosive materials in interstate or foreign
commerce.
Willfulness. The plain indifference to, or purposeful disregard of,
a known
[[Page 60397]]
legal duty. Willfulness may be demonstrated by, but does not require,
repeat violations involving a known legal duty.
Subpart C--General
Sec. 771.25 Communications and pleadings.
(a) All communications to the Government regarding the procedures
set forth in this part and all pleadings, such as answers, motions,
requests, or other papers or documents required or permitted to be
filed under this part, relating to a proceeding pending before an
administrative law judge, shall be addressed to the administrative law
judge at his post of duty and the attorney for the Government.
Communications concerning proceedings not pending before an
administrative law judge should be addressed to the Director of
Industry Operations or Director, as the case may be.
(b) Except to the extent required for the disposition of ex parte
matters as authorized by law, no ex parte communications shall be made
to or from the administrative law judge concerning the merits of the
adjudication. If the administrative law judge receives or makes an ex
parte communication not authorized by law, the administrative law judge
shall place on the record of the proceeding:
(1) All such written communications;
(2) Memoranda stating the substance of all such oral
communications; and
(3) All written responses and memoranda stating the substance of
all oral responses to paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section.
Sec. 771.26 Service on applicant, licensee, or permittee.
All orders, notices, motions, and other formal documents required
to be served under the regulations in this part may be served by
mailing a signed, original copy thereof to the designated
representative of the applicant, licensee, or permittee by certified
mail, with request for return receipt card, at the representative's
business address, by personal service, or as otherwise agreed to by the
parties. If the applicant, licensee, or permittee has not yet
designated a representative, all orders, notices, motions, and other
formal documents required to be served under the regulations in this
part may be served by mailing a signed, original copy thereof to the
applicant, licensee, or permittee at the address stated on his
application, license, or permit, or at his last known address, or by
delivery of such original copy to the applicant, licensee, or permittee
personally, or in the case of a corporation, partnership, or other
unincorporated association, by delivering the same to an officer, or
manager, or general agent thereof, or to its attorney of record. Such
personal service may be made by any employee of the Department of
Justice designated by the Attorney General or by any employee of ATF. A
certificate of mailing and the return receipt card, or certificate of
service signed by the person making such service, shall be filed as a
part of the record.
Sec. 771.27 Service on the Director of Industry Operations or
Director.
Pleadings, motions, notices, and other formal documents may be
served by certified mail, by personal service, or as otherwise agreed
to by the parties on the Director of Industry Operations (or upon the
attorney for the Government on behalf of the Director of Industry
Operations), or on the Director, if the proceeding is before him for
review on appeal.
Time
Sec. 771.28 Computation.
In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by this part,
the day of the act, event, or default after which the designated period
of time is to run is not to be included. The last day of the period to
be computed is to be included, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or
Federal holiday, in which event the period runs until the next day that
is not a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday. Pleadings, requests, or
other papers or documents required or permitted to be filed under this
part must be received for filing at the appropriate office within the
time limits, if any, for such filing.
Sec. 771.29 Continuances and extensions.
For good cause shown, the administrative law judge, Director, or
Director of Industry Operations, as the case may be, may grant
continuances and, as to all matters pending before him, extend any time
limit prescribed by the regulations in this part (except where the time
limit is statutory).
Representation at Hearings
Sec. 771.30 Personal representation.
Any individual or member of a partnership may appear for himself,
or for such partnership, and a corporation or association may be
represented by a bona fide officer of such corporation or association,
upon showing of adequate authorization.
Sec. 771.31 Attorneys and other representatives.
An applicant, licensee, or permittee may represent himself, or be
represented by an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other
person, specifically designated in a duly executed power of attorney
that shall be filed in the proceeding by the applicant, licensee, or
permittee. The applicant, licensee, or permittee shall file waivers, if
applicable, under the Privacy Act of 1974 and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c)
(confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information). The
Director of Industry Operations may be represented in proceedings by an
attorney in the Office of Chief Counsel who is authorized to execute
and file motions, briefs, and other papers in the proceeding on behalf
of the Director of Industry Operations, in the attorney's own name as
``Attorney for the Government.''
Subpart D--Compliance and Settlement
Sec. 771.35 Opportunity for compliance.
No license or permit shall be revoked or denied renewal unless,
prior to the institution of proceedings, facts or conduct warranting
such action shall have been called to the attention of the licensee or
permittee by the Director of Industry Operations in writing in a
contemplated notice, and the licensee or permittee shall have been
accorded an opportunity to demonstrate or achieve compliance with all
lawful requirements as set forth in section 9(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act. In cases in which the Director of Industry Operations
alleges in his contemplated notice, with supporting reasons, willful
violations or that the public interest requires otherwise, this section
does not apply and the issuance of a contemplated notice is
unnecessary.
Sec. 771.36 Settlement.
Any proposals of settlement should be made to the Director of
Industry Operations, but may be made through the attorney for the
Government. Where necessary, the date of the hearing may be postponed
pending consideration of such proposals when they are made in good
faith and not for the purpose of delay. If proposals of settlement are
submitted, and they are considered unsatisfactory, the Director of
Industry Operations may reject the proposals and may, either directly
or through the attorney for the Government, inform the licensee or
permittee of any conditions on which the alleged violations may be
settled. If the proposals of settlement are considered satisfactory to
the Director of
[[Page 60398]]
Industry Operations, the licensee or permittee shall be notified
thereof and the proceeding shall be dismissed.
Sec. 771.37 Notice of contemplated action.
Where the Director of Industry Operations has not ascertained
whether the licensee or permittee has willfully violated the federal
explosives laws and where he believes the matter has the potential to
be settled informally, i.e., without formal administrative proceedings,
he shall, in accordance with section 5(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act, prior to the issuance of a notice of revocation or
denial of renewal, give the licensee or permittee a contemplated notice
of such action and an opportunity to show why the license or permit
should not be revoked or denied renewal. The notice should inform the
licensee or permittee of the charges on which the notice would be
based, if issued, and afford him a period of 15 days from the date of
the notice, or such longer period as the Director of Industry
Operations deems necessary, in which to submit proposals of settlement
to the Director of Industry Operations. Where informal settlement is
not reached promptly because of inaction by the applicant, licensee, or
permittee or proposals are made for the purpose of delay, a notice
shall be issued in accordance with Sec. Sec. 771.42 or 771.43, as
appropriate. The issuance of a notice of contemplated action does not
entitle the recipient to a hearing before an administrative law judge.
Sec. 771.38 Licensee's or permittee's failure to meet requirements
within reasonable time.
If the licensee or permittee fails to meet the requirements of
applicable laws and regulations within such reasonable time as may be
specified by the Director of Industry Operations, proceedings for
revocation or denial of renewal of the license or permit shall be
initiated.
Sec. 771.39 Authority of Director of Industry Operations to proceed
with revocation or denial action.
Where the evidence is conclusive and the nature of the violation is
such as to preclude any settlement, the violation is of a continuing
character that necessitates immediate action to protect the public
interest, or the Director of Industry Operations believes that any
informal settlement of the alleged violation will not ensure future
compliance with applicable laws and regulations, or in any similar case
where the circumstances are such as to clearly preclude informal
settlement, and the Director of Industry Operations so finds and states
the reasons therefor in the notice, the Director of Industry Operations
may proceed with the revocation or denial of renewal.
Subpart E--Revocation or Denial
Sec. 771.40 Denial of initial application.
Whenever the Director of Industry Operations has reason to believe
that an applicant for an original license or permit is not eligible to
receive a license or permit under the provisions of Sec. 555.49 of
this chapter, the Director of Industry Operations shall issue a notice
of denial on ATF Form 5400.11 (Notice of Denial of Application for
License or Permit) (F 5400.11). The notice will set forth the matters
of fact and law relied upon in determining that the application should
be denied and will afford the applicant 15 days from the date of
receipt of the notice in which to request a hearing to review the
denial. If no request for a hearing is filed within that time, a copy
of the application, marked ``Disapproved,'' will be returned to the
applicant.
Sec. 771.41 Denial of renewal application or revocation of license or
permit.
If, following the opportunity for compliance under Sec. 555.71 of
this chapter, or without opportunity for compliance under Sec. 555.71
of this chapter as circumstances warrant, the Director of Industry
Operations finds that the licensee or permittee is not likely to comply
with applicable laws or regulations or is otherwise not eligible to
continue operations authorized under his license or permit, the
Director of Industry Operations shall issue a notice of denial of the
renewal application or revocation of the license or permit, ATF F
5400.11 (Notice of Denial of Application for License or Permit) or ATF
Form 5400.10 (Notice of Revocation of License or Permit) (F 5400.10),
as appropriate. The notice will set forth the matters of fact
constituting the violations specified, dates, places, and the sections
of law and regulations violated. In the case of the revocation of a
license or permit, the notice will specify the date on which the action
is effective, which date will be on or after the date the notice is
served on the licensee or permittee. The notice will also advise the
licensee or permittee that he may, within 15 days after receipt of the
notice, request a hearing and, if applicable, a stay of the effective
date of the revocation of his license or permit.
Sec. 771.42 Grounds for revocation of licenses or permits.
Whenever the Director of Industry Operations has reason to believe
that any holder of a license or permit has willfully violated any
provision of 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40 or the regulations prescribed
thereunder or has become ineligible to continue operations authorized
under the license or permit, the Director of Industry Operations shall
issue a notice for the revocation of such license or permit, as the
case may be.
Sec. 771.43 Grounds for denial of applications for licenses or
permits.
If, upon examination of any application (including a renewal
application) for a license or permit, the Director of Industry
Operations has reason to believe that the applicant is not entitled to
such license or permit, the Director of Industry Operations shall issue
a denial of the application. An applicant is not eligible for a license
or permit if he fails to meet the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 843(b) and
Sec. 555.49 of this chapter.
Subpart F--Hearing Procedure
Notices
Sec. 771.55 Content.
(a) Notices for the revocation or denial of renewal of a license or
permit shall be promptly issued by the Director of Industry Operations
and shall set forth:
(1) The sections of law and regulations relied upon for authority
and jurisdiction;
(2) The specific grounds upon which the revocation or denial is
based, i.e., the matters of fact constituting the violations specified,
dates, places, and sections of law and regulations violated;
(3) In the case of a revocation, the date on which the action is
effective; and
(4) That the licensee or permittee has 15 days from receipt of the
notice within which to request a hearing before an administrative law
judge.
(b) Notices for the denial of an initial application for a license
or permit shall set forth:
(1) The sections of law and regulations relied upon for authority
and jurisdiction;
(2) The specific grounds upon which the denial is based, i.e., the
matters of fact and law relied upon for the disapproval of the
application; and
(3) That the application will be disapproved unless a hearing is
requested within 15 days from receipt of the Notice.
Sec. 771.56 Forms.
Notices shall be issued on the following forms:
(a) ATF Form 5400.9, ``Order After Denial or Revocation Hearing,''
for all revocations or denials of renewal of licenses or permits
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40 after a hearing has been held and a
Recommended Decision
[[Page 60399]]
has been issued by the administrative law judge;
(b) Form 5400.10, ``Notice of Revocation for License or Permit,''
for all revocations of licenses or permits pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Chapter 40, except as provided for in paragraph (a) of this section;
(c) Form 5400.11, ``Notice of Denial of Application for License or
Permit,'' for the denial of renewal or original applications for
licenses or permits pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40, except as
provided for in paragraph (a) of this section;
(d) Form 5400.12, ``Notice of Contemplated Denial or Revocation of
License or Permit,'' for the contemplated revocation or denial of
renewal application of licenses or permits pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Chapter 40; or
(e) Such other forms as the Director may prescribe.
Sec. 771.57 Execution and disposition.
A signed original of the applicable form shall be served on the
licensee or permittee. If a hearing is requested, a copy shall be sent
to the administrative law judge designated to conduct the hearing. Any
remaining copies shall be retained for the office of the Director of
Industry Operations.
Sec. 771.58 Designated place of hearing.
The designated place of hearing shall be determined by the
administrative law judge, taking into consideration the convenience and
necessity of the parties and their representatives.
Request for Hearing
Sec. 771.59 Initial application proceedings.
(a) If the applicant for an initial license or permit desires a
hearing, he shall file a request in writing with the Director of
Industry Operations within 15 days after receipt of notice of the
disapproval, in whole or in part, of the application. The request
should include a statement of the reasons for a hearing.
(b) On receipt of the request, the Director of Industry Operations
shall forward a copy of the request, together with a copy of the
notice, to the Office of Chief Counsel for the assignment of an
administrative law judge.
(c) After the Office of Chief Counsel notifies the Director of
Industry Operations or the attorney for the Government of the
assignment of an administrative law judge, the Director of Industry
Operations shall notify the licensee or permittee of the assignment.
Sec. 771.60 Revocation or denial of renewal proceedings.
(a) If the licensee or permittee desires a hearing, he shall file a
request, in writing, with the Director of Industry Operations within 15
days after receipt of the notice or within such time as the Director of
Industry Operations may allow.
(b) Where a licensee or permittee requests a hearing, the Director
of Industry Operations shall forward a copy of the request, together
with a copy of the notice, to the Office of Chief Counsel for the
assignment of an administrative law judge.
(c) After the Office of Chief Counsel notifies the Director of
Industry Operations or the attorney for the Government of the
assignment of an administrative law judge, the Director of Industry
Operations shall notify the licensee or permittee of the assignment.
(d) In the case of a revocation, a licensee or permittee may
include a request for a stay of the effective date of revocation with
the request for a hearing.
(e) On receipt of a request for a stay of the effective date of a
revocation, the Director of Industry Operations shall timely advise the
licensee or permittee whether the stay is granted.
(1) If the stay is granted, the matter shall be referred to an
administrative law judge pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) If the stay is denied, the licensee or permittee may request an
immediate hearing. In this event, the Director of Industry Operations
shall immediately refer the matter to the Office of Chief Counsel for
the assignment of an administrative law judge, who shall set a date and
place for hearing, which date shall be no later than 10 days from the
date the licensee or permittee requested the immediate hearing.
Sec. 771.61 Notice of hearing.
Once a request for a hearing has been referred to the
administrative law judge, the administrative law judge shall set a time
and place for a hearing and shall serve notice thereof upon the parties
at least 10 days in advance of the hearing date.
Non-Request for Hearing
Sec. 771.62 Initial application.
In the case of an initial application, if the applicant does not
request a hearing within 15 days, or within such additional time as the
Director of Industry Operations may in his discretion allow, the
Director of Industry Operations will return a copy of the application,
marked ``Disapproved,'' to the applicant, accompanied by a brief
statement including the findings upon which the denial is based.
Sec. 771.63 Revocation or denial of renewal.
In the case of a revocation or denial of renewal of an application,
if the licensee or permittee does not request a hearing within 15 days,
or within such additional time as the Director of Industry Operations
may in his discretion allow, the Director of Industry Operations shall
make the initial decision in the case pursuant to Sec. 771.78(b).
Responses to Notices
Sec. 771.64 Answers.
(a) Where the licensee or permittee requests a hearing in
accordance with Sec. 771.60 of this chapter, a written response to the
relevant notice may be filed with the administrative law judge and
served on the Director of Industry Operations within 15 days after the
licensee or permittee receives service of the designation of the
administrative law judge.
(b) Where no hearing is requested, the licensee or permittee may
file a written answer to the relevant notice with the Director of
Industry Operations within 15 days after service of the notice.
(c) An answer shall contain a concise statement of the facts that
constitute the grounds for defense. A hearing, if requested, may be
limited to the issues contained in the notice and the answer. The
administrative law judge or Director of Industry Operations, as the
case may be, may, as a matter of discretion, waive any requirement of
this section.
(d) Answers need not be filed in initial application proceedings.
Sec. 771.65 Responses admitting facts.
If the licensee or permittee desires to waive the hearing on the
allegations of fact set forth in the notice and does not contest the
facts, the answer may consist of a statement that the licensee or
permittee admits all material allegations of fact charged in the notice
to be true. The Director of Industry Operations shall base the decision
on the notice and such answer, although such an answer shall not affect
the licensee's or permittee's right to submit proposed findings of fact
and conclusions of law or right to appeal.
Sec. 771.66 Initial conferences.
(a) In any proceeding, the administrative law judge, upon his own
motion or upon the motion of one of the parties or their qualified
representatives, may in the administrative law judge's discretion
direct the parties or their qualified representatives to appear at a
specified time and place for a conference to consider:
(1) Simplification of the issues;
[[Page 60400]]
(2) The necessity of amendments to the pleadings;
(3) The possibility of obtaining stipulations, admissions of facts,
and documents;
(4) The possibility of both parties exchanging information or
scheduling discovery;
(5) A date on which both parties will simultaneously submit lists
of proposed hearing exhibits;
(6) Limiting the number of expert witnesses;
(7) Identifying and, if practicable, scheduling all witnesses to be
called; however, there is no requirement in these proceedings for the
parties to submit pre-hearing statements or statements of proposed
testimony by witnesses; and
(8) Such other matters as may aid in the disposition of the
proceeding.
(b) As soon as practicable after such conference, the
administrative law judge shall issue an order that recites the action
taken, the amendments allowed to the pleadings, and the agreements made
by the parties or their qualified representatives as to any of the
matters considered. The order shall also limit the issues for hearing
to those not disposed of by admission or agreement. Such order shall
control the subsequent course of the proceedings, unless modified for
good cause by a subsequent order. After discovery is complete, the
order may be amended or supplemented if necessary.
Failure to Appear
Sec. 771.67 Initial applications.
Where the applicant on an initial application for a license or
permit has requested a hearing and does not appear at the appointed
time and place, evidence has not been offered to refute or explain the
grounds upon which disapproval of the application is contemplated, and
no good cause has been shown for the failure to appear, the applicant
shall be considered to have waived the hearing. When such waiver
occurs, a default judgment against the applicant will be entered and
the administrative law judge shall recommend disapproval of said
application.
Sec. 771.68 Revocation or denial of renewal.
If, on the date set for a hearing concerning the revocation or
denial of renewal of a license or permit, the licensee or permittee
does not appear, no evidence has been offered, and no good cause has
been shown for the failure to appear, the attorney for the Government
will proceed ex parte and offer for the record sufficient evidence to
make a prima facie case. At such hearing, documents, statements, and
affidavits may be submitted in lieu of testimony of witnesses.
Waiver of Hearing
Sec. 771.69 Withdrawal of request for hearing.
At any time prior to the assignment of an administrative law judge,
the licensee or permittee may, by filing written notice with the
Director of Industry Operations, withdraw his request for a hearing. If
such a notice is filed after assignment to the administrative law judge
and prior to issuance of his recommended decision the Director of
Industry Operations shall move the administrative law judge to dismiss
the proceedings as moot. If such a notice is filed either after
issuance of a notice of denial or notice of revocation and before
assignment of the administrative law judge, or after issuance by the
administrative law judge of his recommended decision and prior to the
Director of Industry Operations' order disapproving the application or
denying the renewal of or revoking the license or permit, the Director
of Industry Operations shall, by order, dismiss the proceeding.
Sec. 771.70 Adjudication based upon written submissions.
The licensee or permittee may waive the hearing before the
administrative law judge and stipulate that the matter will be
adjudicated by the Director of Industry Operations based upon written
submissions. Written submissions may include stipulations of law or
facts, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, briefs, or any
other documentary material. The pleadings, together with the written
submissions of both the licensee or permittee and the attorney for the
Government, shall constitute the record on which the initial decision
shall be based. The election to contest the denial or revocation
without a hearing under this section does not affect the licensee's or
permittee's right to appeal to the Director pursuant to Sec. 555.79 of
this chapter or to the United States Court of Appeals for the district
in which the licensee or permittee resides or has his principle place
of business pursuant to Sec. 555.80 of this chapter.
Surrender of License or Permit
Sec. 771.71 Before citation.
If a licensee or permittee surrenders the license or permit before
the notice of revocation or denial of renewal, the Director of Industry
Operations may accept the surrender. But if the evidence, in the
opinion of the Director of Industry Operations, warrants issuance of a
notice for revocation or denial of renewal, the surrender shall be
refused and the Director of Industry Operations shall issue the notice.
Sec. 771.72 After citation.
If a licensee or permittee surrenders the license or permit after
notice, but prior to the referral to an administrative law judge and
prior to an initial decision, the Director of Industry Operations may
accept the surrender of the license or permit and dismiss the
proceeding as moot. If a licensee or permittee surrenders the license
or permit after notice and after the referral to the administrative law
judge, but prior to the issuance of a recommended decision, the
Director of Industry Operations may accept the surrender of the license
or permit and shall move the administrative law judge to dismiss the
proceedings as moot. In either case, if, in the opinion of the Director
of Industry Operations, the evidence is such as to warrant revocation
or denial of renewal, as the case may be, the surrender of the license
or permit shall be refused, and the proceeding shall continue.
Motions
Sec. 771.73 General.
All motions shall be made and addressed to the administrative law
judge before whom the proceeding is pending, and copies of all motion
papers shall be served upon the other party or parties. The
administrative law judge may dispose of any motion without oral
argument, but he may, if he so desires, set it down for hearing and
request argument. The administrative law judge may dispose of such
motion prior to the hearing on the merits or he may postpone the
disposition until the hearing on the merits. No appeal may be taken
from any ruling on a motion until the whole record is certified for
review. Examples of typical motions may be found in the Rules of Civil
Procedure referred to in Sec. 771.2.
Sec. 771.74 Prior to hearing.
All motions that should be made prior to the hearing, such as a
motion directed to the sufficiency of the pleadings or of preliminary
orders, shall be filed in writing with the Director of Industry
Operations or the administrative law judge if the matter has been
referred to him, and shall briefly state the order or relief applied
for and the grounds for such motion.
Sec. 771.75 At hearing.
Motions at the hearing may be made in writing to the administrative
law judge or stated orally on the record.
[[Page 60401]]
Hearing
Sec. 771.76 General.
If a hearing is requested, it shall be held at the time and place
stated in the notice of hearing unless otherwise ordered by the
administrative law judge.
Sec. 771.77 Initial applications.
(a) The administrative law judge who presides at the hearing on
initial applications shall recommend a decision to the Director of
Industry Operations. The administrative law judge shall certify the
complete record of the proceedings before him and shall immediately
forward the complete certified record to the Director of Industry
Operations. The administrative law judge shall also send one copy of
his recommended decision to the applicant or the applicant's
representative, one copy to the attorney for the Government, and one
copy to the Director of Industry Operations, who shall make the initial
decision as provided in Sec. 771.107. The applicant may be directed by
the Director of Industry Operations to produce such records as may be
deemed necessary for examination. All hearings on applications shall be
open to the public subject to such restrictions and limitations as may
be consistent with orderly procedure.
(b) If no hearing is requested, the return of the application
marked ``Disapproved'' is the Director of Industry Operations' initial
decision.
Sec. 771.78 Revocation or denial of renewal.
(a) The administrative law judge who presides at the hearing in
proceedings for the revocation or denial of renewal of licenses or
permits shall make a recommended decision to the Director of Industry
Operations. The administrative law judge shall certify the complete
record of the proceedings before him and shall immediately forward the
complete certified record to the Director of Industry Operations. The
administrative law judge shall also send one copy of his recommended
decision to the licensee or permittee or the licensee's or permittee's
representative, one copy to the attorney for the Government, and one
copy to the Director of Industry Operations, who shall make the initial
decision as provided in Sec. 771.109.
(b) If no hearing is requested, the Director of Industry Operations
shall make the initial decision.
Burden of Proof
Sec. 771.79 Initial applications.
In hearings on the initial denial of applications, the burden of
proof is on the Government to show by a preponderance of the evidence
that the Director of Industry Operations had reason to believe that the
applicant is not entitled to a permit or license.
Sec. 771.80 Revocation or denial of renewal.
In hearings on the revocation or denial of renewal of a license or
permit, the burden of proof is on the Government to show that the
Director of Industry Operations had reason to believe that the licensee
or permittee is not entitled to a permit or license, as may be the
case. The Government must meet this proof by a preponderance of the
evidence.
General
Sec. 771.81 Stipulations at hearing.
If there has been no initial conference under Sec. 771.66, the
administrative law judge may at the beginning of the hearing require
that the parties attempt to arrive at such stipulations as will
eliminate the necessity of taking evidence with respect to allegations
of fact about which there is no substantial dispute. The administrative
law judge should take similar action, where appropriate, throughout the
hearing and should call and conduct any conferences that he deems
advisable with a view to the simplification, clarification, and
disposition of any of the issues involved in the hearing.
Sec. 771.82 Evidence.
Any relevant evidence that would be admissible under the rules of
evidence governing civil proceedings in matters not involving trial by
jury in the Courts of the United States shall be admissible. The
administrative law judge may relax such rules in any hearing when in
his judgment such relaxation would not impair the rights of either
party and would more speedily conclude the hearing or would better
serve the ends of justice. However, the administrative law judge shall
provide for the exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly
repetitious evidence. Every party shall have the right to present his
case or defense by oral or documentary evidence, depositions, or duly
authenticated copies of records and documents; to submit rebuttal
evidence; and to conduct such reasonable cross-examination as may be
required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
(a) Witnesses. The administrative law judge shall have the right in
his discretion to limit the number of witnesses whose testimony may be
merely cumulative and shall, as a matter of policy, not only exclude
irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence but shall also
limit the cross-examination of witnesses to that required for a full
and true disclosure of the facts so as not to unnecessarily prolong the
hearing and unduly burden the record. Opinion testimony shall be
admitted when the administrative law judge is satisfied that the
witness is properly qualified as defined by Federal Rule of Evidence
701.
(b) Documentary Evidence. Material and relevant evidence shall not
be excluded because it is not the best evidence unless its authenticity
is challenged, in which case reasonable time shall be given to
establish its authenticity. When only portions of a document are to be
relied upon, the offering party shall prepare the pertinent excerpts,
adequately identified, and shall supply copies of such excerpts,
together with a statement indicating the purpose for which such
materials will be offered, to the administrative law judge and to the
other parties. Only the excerpts, so prepared and submitted, shall be
received in the record. However, the whole of the original document
should be made available for examination and for use by opposing
counsel for purposes of cross-examination. Compilations, charts,
summaries of data, and photostatic copies of documents may be admitted
in evidence if the proceedings will thereby be expedited, and if the
material upon which they are based is available for examination by the
parties. Objections to the evidence shall be in short form, stating the
grounds relied upon. The transcript shall not include argument or
debate on objections, except as ordered by the administrative law
judge, but shall include the rulings thereon. Where official notice is
taken of a material fact not appearing in the evidence in the record,
any party shall, on timely request, be afforded an opportunity to
controvert such fact.
(c) Hearsay. Probative, material, and reliable hearsay evidence is
admissible in proceedings under this subpart.
Sec. 771.83 Closing of hearings; arguments, briefs, and proposed
findings.
Before closing a hearing, the administrative law judge shall
inquire of each party whether the party has any further evidence to
offer, which inquiry and the response thereto shall be shown in the
record. The administrative law judge may hear arguments of counsel and
the administrative law judge may limit the time of such arguments at
his discretion. The administrative law judge may, in his discretion,
allow briefs to be filed on behalf of either party but shall closely
limit the time within which the briefs for both parties shall be filed,
so
[[Page 60402]]
as to avoid unreasonable delay. The administrative law judge shall also
ascertain whether the parties desire to submit proposed findings and
conclusions, together with supporting reasons, and, if so, a period of
not more than 15 days (unless extended by the administrative law
judge)--after the close of the hearing or receipt of a copy of the
record, if one is requested--will be allowed for such purpose.
Sec. 771.84 Reopening of the hearing.
The Director, the Director of Industry Operations, or the
administrative law judge, as the case may be, may, as to all matters
pending before him, in his discretion reopen a hearing--
(a) In case of default under Sec. Sec. 771.67 or 771.68 where the
applicant, licensee, or permittee failed to request a hearing or to
appear after one was set, upon petition setting forth reasonable
grounds for such failure, and
(b) Where any party desires leave to adduce additional evidence
upon petition summarizing such evidence, establishing its materiality,
and stating reasonable grounds why such party with due diligence was
unable to produce such evidence at the hearing.
Record of Testimony
Sec. 771.85 Stenographic record.
A stenographic record shall be made of the testimony and
proceedings, including stipulations, admissions of fact, and arguments
of counsel in all proceedings. A transcript of the evidence and
proceedings at the hearing shall be made in all cases.
Sec. 771.86 Oath of reporter.
The reporter making the stenographic record shall subscribe an oath
before the administrative law judge, to be filed in the record of the
case, that he will truly and correctly report the oral testimony and
proceedings at such hearing and accurately transcribe the same to the
best of his ability.
Subpart G--Administrative Law Judges
Sec. 771.95 Responsibilities of administrative law judges.
Administrative law judges shall be under the administrative control
of the Director. In hearings under this subpart, administrative law
judges must apply all governing agency rulings and governing agency
precedent. They shall be responsible for the conduct of hearings and
shall render their decisions as soon as is reasonably possible after
the hearing is closed. Administrative law judges shall also be
responsible for the preparation, certification, and forwarding of the
complete record of proceedings and the administrative work relating
thereto and, by arrangement with Directors of Industry Operations and
representatives of the Office of Chief Counsel shall have access to
facilities and temporary use of personnel at such times and places as
are needed in the prompt dispatch of official business.
Sec. 771.96 Disqualification.
An administrative law judge shall, at any time, withdraw from any
proceeding if he deems himself disqualified. Upon the filing in good
faith by the applicant, licensee, permittee, or attorney for the
Government of a timely and sufficient affidavit of facts showing
personal bias or otherwise warranting the disqualification of any
administrative law judge, if the administrative law judge fails to
disqualify himself, the Director shall upon appeal, as provided in
Sec. 771.120, determine the matter as a part of the record and
decision in the proceeding. If the Director decides the administrative
law judge should have deemed himself disqualified, the Director will
remand the record for hearing de novo before another administrative law
judge. If the Director should decide against the disqualification of
the administrative law judge, the proceeding will be reviewed on its
merits by the original administrative law judge. The burden is upon the
party seeking disqualification to set forth evidence sufficient to
overcome the presumption of the administrative law judge's honesty and
integrity.
Sec. 771.97 Powers.
Administrative law judges shall have authority to:
(a) Administer oaths and affirmations;
(b) Issue subpoenas as authorized by law;
(c) Rule upon offers of proof and receive relevant evidence;
(d) Take or cause depositions to be taken whenever the ends of
justice would be served thereby;
(e) Regulate the course of the hearing;
(f) Hold conferences for the settlement or simplification of the
issues by consent of the parties;
(g) Require the attendance at such conferences of at least one
representative of each party who has the authority to negotiate
concerning resolution of issues in controversy;
(h) Dispose of procedural requests or similar matters;
(i) Render recommended decisions in proceedings on applications for
licenses and permits and on revocation or denial of renewal of licenses
or permits;
(j) Call, examine, and cross-examine witnesses, including hostile
or adverse witnesses, when the administrative law judge deems such
action to be necessary to a just disposition of the case, and introduce
into the record documentary or other evidence; and
(k) Take any other action authorized by rule of the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act.
Sec. 771.98 Separation of functions.
Administrative law judges shall perform no functions inconsistent
with their duties and responsibilities. The Director may assign
administrative law judges duties not inconsistent with the performance
of their functions as administrative law judges. Except to the extent
required for the disposition of ex parte matters as required by law, no
administrative law judge shall consult any person or party as to any
fact in issue unless there has been notice and opportunity for all
parties to participate. The functions of the administrative law judge
shall be entirely separated from the general investigative functions of
the agency. No officer, employee, or agent engaged in the performance
of investigative or prosecuting functions in any proceeding shall, in
that proceeding or a factually related proceeding, participate or
advise in the administrative law judge's or Director's decision, or in
the agency review on appeal, except as a witness or counsel in the
proceedings. The administrative law judge may not informally obtain
advice or opinions from the parties or their counsel, or from any
officer or employee of the ATF, as to the facts or the weight or
interpretation to be given to the evidence. The administrative law
judge may, however, informally obtain advice on matters of law or
procedure in a proceeding from officers or employees who were not
engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions in
that proceeding or a factually related proceeding. The administrative
law judge may, at any time, consult with and obtain instructions from
the Director on questions of law and policy. Furthermore, it is not a
violation of the separation of functions for the administrative law
judge to participate in the questioning of witnesses, where the
questioning is for clarification or to move the proceedings along, and
where the questioning is not so extensive as to place the
administrative law judge in the position of a prosecuting officer.
[[Page 60403]]
Sec. 771.99 Conduct of hearing.
The administrative law judge is charged with the duty of conducting
a fair and impartial hearing and of maintaining order in form and
manner consistent with the dignity of a court proceeding. In the event
that counsel or any person or witness in any proceeding shall refuse to
obey the orders of the administrative law judge, or be guilty of
disorderly or contemptuous language or conduct in connection with any
hearing, the administrative law judge may, for good cause stated in the
record, suspend the hearing, and, in the case of disorderly or
contemptuous language or conduct by an attorney, recommend that the
Director report the matter to the Chief Counsel regarding the attorney
for the Government or the applicable state bar association regarding
the attorney for a licensee or permittee for disciplinary action. The
refusal of a witness to answer any question that has been ruled to be
proper shall be considered by the administrative law judge in
determining the weight to be given all the testimony of that witness.
Sec. 771.100 Unavailability of administrative law judge.
In the event that the administrative law judge designated to
conduct a hearing becomes unavailable before the filing of his findings
and recommended decision, the Director may assign the case to another
administrative law judge for the continuance of the proceeding, in
accordance with the regulations in this part in the same manner as if
he had been designated administrative law judge at the commencement of
the proceeding.
Subpart H--Decisions
Sec. 771.105 Administrative law judge's findings and recommended
decision.
Within a reasonable time after the conclusion of the hearing, and
as expeditiously as possible, the administrative law judge shall render
his recommended decision. All decisions shall become a part of the
record and, if proposed findings and conclusions have been filed, shall
show the administrative law judge's ruling upon each of such proposed
findings and conclusions. Decisions shall consist of:
(a) A brief statement of the issues of fact involved in the
proceeding;
(b) The administrative law judge's findings and conclusions, as
well as the reasons or basis therefor with record references, upon all
the material issues of fact, law, or discretion presented on the record
(including, when appropriate, comment as to the credibility and
demeanor of the witnesses); and
(c) The administrative law judge's recommended determination as to
the revocation or denial at issue.
Sec. 771.106 Certification and transmittal of record and decision.
After reaching his decision, the administrative law judge shall
certify the complete record of the proceeding before him and shall
immediately forward the complete certified record together with one
copy of the administrative law judge's recommended decision to the
Director of Industry Operations for initial decision, one copy of the
recommended decision to the applicant or the applicant's
representative, and one copy of the recommended decision to the
attorney for the Government.
Action by Director of Industry Operations
Sec. 771.107 Initial application proceedings.
(a) Accepting the recommended decision. If the Director of Industry
Operations, after consideration of the record of the hearing and of any
proposed findings, conclusions, or exceptions filed with him by the
applicant, accepts the recommended decision of the administrative law
judge, the Director of Industry Operations shall by order approve or
disapprove of the application in accordance with the recommended
decision. If the Director of Industry Operations approves the
application, he shall briefly state for the record his reasons
therefor. However, if the Director of Industry Operations disapproves
of the applications, he shall serve a copy of the administrative law
judge's recommended decision on the applicant, informing the applicant
of the Director of Industry Operations' contemplated action and
affording the applicant not more than 10 days in which to submit
proposed findings and conclusions or exceptions to the recommended
decision with reasons in support thereof.
(b) Rejecting the recommended decision. If, after such
consideration referenced in paragraph (a) of this section, the Director
of Industry Operations rejects the recommended decision of the
administrative law judge, in whole or in part, the Director of Industry
Operations shall by order make such findings and conclusions as in his
opinion are warranted by the law and facts in the record. Any decision
of the Director of Industry Operations ordering the disapproval of an
application for a permit shall state the findings and conclusions upon
which it is based, including his ruling upon each proposed finding,
conclusion, and exception to the administrative law judge's recommended
decision, together with a statement of the administrative law judge's
findings, conclusions, and reasons or basis therefor, upon all material
issues of fact, law, or discretion presented on the record. A signed
original of the decision of the Director of Industry Operations shall
be served upon the applicant and the original copy containing a
certificate of service shall be placed in the official record of the
proceeding.
Sec. 771.108 Director of Industry Operations' decision.
When the Director of Industry Operations issues an initial decision
in accordance with Sec. Sec. 771.77 or 771.107 the decision shall
become a part of the record. The decision shall consist of:
(a) A brief statement of the issues involved in the proceedings;
(b) The Director of Industry Operations' findings and conclusions,
as well as the reasons therefor; and
(c) The Director of Industry Operations' determination on the
record.
Sec. 771.109 Revocation or denial of renewal proceedings.
(a) Accepting the recommended decision. After consideration of the
complete certified record of the hearing, if the Director of Industry
Operations agrees with the recommended decision of the administrative
law judge, the Director of Industry Operations shall enter an order
revoking or denying the renewal of the license or permit or dismissing
the proceedings in accordance with the administrative law judge's
recommended decision.
(b) Rejecting the recommended decision. After consideration of the
complete certified record of the hearing, if the Director of Industry
Operations disagrees with the recommended decision of the
administrative law judge, he may file a petition with the Director for
review of the recommended decision, as provided in Sec. 771.120. If
the Director of Industry Operations files such a petition, he shall
withhold issuance of the order pending the decision of the Director,
upon receipt of which he shall issue the order in accordance with the
Director's decision. A signed original of the order of the Director of
Industry Operations shall be served upon the licensee or permittee or
his representative and the original copy containing a certificate of
service shall be placed in the official record of the proceeding.
[[Page 60404]]
(c) In a case where the initial decision is made by the Director of
Industry Operations in accordance with Sec. 771.78(b), the Director of
Industry Operations shall also issue an order revoking or denying the
renewal of the license or permit, or dismissing the proceedings in
accordance with his initial decision. A signed original of the decision
and order of the Director of Industry Operations shall be served upon
the licensee or permittee or his representative and the original copy
placed in the official record of the proceeding.
Sec. 771.110 Revocation or denial of renewal.
Pursuant to Sec. 771.109(a), when the Director of Industry
Operations issues an order revoking or denying the renewal of a license
or permit, he shall furnish a copy of the order and of the recommended
decision on which it is based to the Director. Should such order be
subsequently set aside on review by the courts, the Director of
Industry Operations will so advise the Director.
Sec. 771.111 Proceedings involving violations not within the division
of issuance of license or permit.
In the event violations occurred at a place not within the field
division where the licensee or permittee is located, the Director of
Industry Operations of the field division where the licensee or
permittee is located will take jurisdiction over any proceeding and
will take appropriate action in accordance with this subpart, including
issuing the relevant notice.
Subpart I--Review
Sec. 771.120 Appeal on petition to the Director.
(a) An appeal to the Director may be made by the applicant,
licensee, or permittee, or by the Director of Industry Operations. For
the applicant, licensee, or permittee, such appeal shall be made by
filing a petition for review on appeal with the Director within 15 days
of the service of the adverse initial decision by the Director of
Industry Operations. For the Director of Industry Operations, such
appeal shall be taken by filing a petition for review on appeal with
the Director within 15 days of the issuance of the administrative law
judge's decision recommending against revocation or denial of renewal.
The petitioning applicant, licensee, or permittee must submit arguments
showing that the Director of Industry Operations' initial decision, and
if applicable the underlying administrative law judge's recommended
decision, was without reasonable warrant in fact or contrary to law and
regulations. The petitioning DIO must submit arguments showing the
administrative law judge's recommended decision was without reasonable
warrant in fact or contrary to law and regulations. Nothing in these
regulations shall limit the authority of the Director to review the
administrative law judge's decision exercising all the powers that he
would have in making the recommended decision.
(b) A copy of the petition shall be filed with the Director of
Industry Operations or served on the applicant, licensee, or permittee,
as the case may be. In the event of an appeal, the Director of Industry
Operations shall immediately certify and forward the complete original
record, by certified mail, to the Director, for his consideration and
review.
Sec. 771.121 Review by Director.
(a) Modification or reversal. On appeal, the Director shall afford
a reasonable opportunity for the submission of proposed findings,
conclusions, or exceptions with reasons in support thereof and an
opportunity for oral argument. The Director may alter or modify any
finding of the administrative law judge (or of the Director of Industry
Operations as the case may be) and may affirm, reverse, or modify the
recommended decision of the administrative law judge, or the initial
decision of the Director of Industry Operations, or may remand the case
for further hearing, but shall not consider evidence that is not a part
of the record.
(b) Affirmance. Except in the case of a remand, when, on appeal,
the Director affirms the initial decision of the Director of Industry
Operations or the recommended decision of the administrative law judge,
as the case may be, such decision shall be the agency's final decision.
(c) Recusal. Appeals and petitions for review shall not be decided
by the Director in any proceeding in which the Director has engaged in
an investigation or prosecution and in such event the Director shall so
state his disqualification in writing and refer the record to the
Deputy Director for appropriate action. The Deputy Director may
designate an Assistant Director or one of the Deputy Director's
principal aides to consider any proceeding instead of the Director. The
original copy of the decision on review shall be placed in the official
record of the proceeding, a signed duplicate original shall be served
upon the applicant, licensee, or permittee, and a copy shall be
transmitted to the Director of Industry Operations.
Sec. 771.122 Denial of renewal or revocation.
If the Director orders the denial of an application, a copy of the
application marked ``Disapproved'' will be returned to the applicant by
the Director of Industry Operations. If the Director orders a
revocation of a license of permit, any stay of revocation will be
withdrawn and the revocation will become effective upon the order of
the Director of Industry Operations. After the issuance of a denial of
a renewal application or a revocation, and pending the final
determination of a timely appeal, the licensee or permittee may
continue operations, if at all, pursuant to Sec. 555.83 of this
chapter.
Sec. 771.123 Court review.
(a) If an applicant, licensee, or permittee files an appeal in the
United States Court of Appeals for the district in which he resides or
has his principle place of business, within 60 days after the receipt
of the Director's decision, the Director, upon notification that an
appeal has been taken, shall prepare the record for submission to the
court in accordance with applicable court rules.
(b) If an applicant, licensee, or permittee does not seek review
with the Director, but instead seeks review within 60 days after the
receipt of the initial decision of the Director of Industry Operations
pursuant to Sec. 771.109, the Director of Industry Operations, upon
notification that an appeal has been taken, shall prepare the record
for submission to the court in accordance with applicable court rules.
The Director of Industry Operations shall notify the Director if such
an appeal is taken.
(c) The Director, or the Director of Industry Operations, as the
case may be, shall certify the correctness of the transcript of the
record, forward one copy to the attorney for the Government in the
review of the case, and file the original record of the proceedings
with the original certificate in the appropriate United States Court of
Appeals.
Subpart J--Miscellaneous
Sec. 771.124 Depositions.
The administrative law judge may take or order the taking of
depositions by either party to the proceeding at such time and place as
the administrative law judge may designate before a person having the
power to administer oaths, upon application therefor and notice to the
parties to the action. The testimony shall be reduced to writing by the
person taking the deposition, or a person under his direction, and the
deposition shall be subscribed by the
[[Page 60405]]
deponent unless subscribing thereof is waived in writing by the
parties.
Sec. 771.125 Witnesses and fees.
Witnesses summoned before the administrative law judge may be paid
the same fees and mileage that are paid witnesses in the courts of the
United States, and witnesses whose depositions are taken and the
persons taking the same shall severally be entitled to the same fees as
are paid for like services in the courts of the United States. Witness
fees and mileage shall be paid by the party at whose instance the
witnesses appear and the person taking the deposition shall be paid by
the party at whose instance the deposition is taken.
Sec. 771.126 Discovery.
The discovery provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are not controlling with
respect to agency proceedings under this part. However, fundamental
fairness requires a party be given the opportunity to know what
evidence is offered and a chance to rebut such evidence. Either party
may petition the administrative law judge for non-burdensome discovery
if the party can demonstrate that the interests of justice require
disclosure of these materials.
Sec. 771.127 Privileges.
The Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 559, provides that,
except as otherwise required by law, privileges relating to procedure
or evidence apply equally to agencies and persons. Therefore, an agency
may rely on judicially-approved privileges to resist production of its
files where appropriate.
Record
Sec. 771.135 What constitutes record.
The transcript of testimony, pleadings, exhibits, all papers and
requests filed in the proceeding, and all findings, decisions, and
orders, shall constitute the exclusive record. Where the decision rests
on official notice of material fact not appearing in the record, the
administrative law judge shall so state in his findings and any party
shall, on timely request, be afforded an opportunity to show facts to
the contrary.
Sec. 771.136 Availability.
A copy of the record shall be available for inspection or copying
by the parties to the proceedings during business hours at the office
of the administrative law judge or the Director of Industry Operations
or, pending administrative review, at the Office of the Director.
Dated: October 1, 2014.
Eric H. Holder, Jr.,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. 2014-23932 Filed 10-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-FY-P