Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Palisades Nuclear Plant, 60197 [2014-23802]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 193 / Monday, October 6, 2014 / Notices 60197 Day Event/Activity A .................. If access granted: Issuance of presiding officer or other designated officer decision on motion for protective order for access to sensitive information (including schedule for providing access and submission of contentions) or decision reversing a final adverse determination by the NRC staff. Deadline for filing executed Non-Disclosure Affidavits. Access provided to SUNSI consistent with decision issuing the protective order. Deadline for submission of contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI. However, if more than 25 days remain between the petitioner’s receipt of (or access to) the information and the deadline for filing all other contentions (as established in the notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing), the petitioner may file its SUNSI contentions by that later deadline. (Contention receipt +25) Answers to contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI. (Answer receipt +7) Petitioner/Intervenor reply to answers. Decision on contention admission. A + 3 ........... A + 23 ......... A + 48 ......... A + 55 ......... >A + 55 ....... [FR Doc. 2014–23800 Filed 10–3–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50–255; NRC–2014–0216] Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Palisades Nuclear Plant Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: 10 CFR 2.206 request; receipt. AGENCY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is giving notice that by petition dated March 5, 2014, as supplemented by email dated May 21, 2014, Michael Mulligan (the petitioner) has requested that the NRC take enforcement action against Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., due to recent plant events and equipment failures at Palisades Nuclear Plant (PNP). The petitioner’s requests are included in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2014–0216 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this document using any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2014–0216. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. To begin the search, select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:17 Oct 03, 2014 Jkt 235001 email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this document (if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced. • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that by petition dated March 5, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14071A006), as supplemented by email dated May 21, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14142A101), and the petitioner’s addresses to the Petition Review Board dated April 8 and September 3, 2014 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML14143A212 and ML14259A135, respectively), the petitioner, has asked the NRC to take enforcement action against Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., due to recent plant events and equipment failures at PNP. The petitioner was particularly concerned with primary coolant pump (PCP) impeller pieces breaking off and lodging in the reactor vessel. The petitioner requests the following actions: • Require PNP to open every PCP for inspection and clear up all flaws. • Require PNP to replace the PCPs with a design for their intended duty. • An Office of Inspector General (OIG) inspection on why there are different analysis criteria for similar PCP events between the NRC regions. • A ten million dollar fine for these events. • Intensify NRC monitoring of PNP, and return them to yellow or red status. As the basis for the request, the petitioner stated, in part, the following: • The petitioner cited other recent plant events and equipment failures, such as leakage from the safety injection refueling water tank, and flaws in the control rod drive mechanisms. • The petitioner asserted the licensee and the NRC staff used non-conservative PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 engineering judgment during the evaluation of the lodged PCP impeller piece and during the operability evaluation of the existing PCP impellers. • The petitioner asserts that the NRC staff was not being aggressive in resolving plant equipment issues, not resolving PCP equipment issues uniformly across the NRC regions, and accommodating the nuclear industry. The request is being treated pursuant to § 2.206 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), and has been referred to the Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.206, the NRC will take appropriate action on this petition within a reasonable period of time. The petitioner met with the NRR’s Petition Review Board on April 8 and September 3, 2014, to discuss the petition. The Petition Review Board considered the results of that discussion in its determination of the petitioner’s request for immediate action and in the establishment of the schedule for the review of the petition. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of September 2014. For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Daniel H. Dorman, Acting Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2014–23802 Filed 10–3–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC–2014–0093] Medical Evaluation of Licensed Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Regulatory guide; issuance. AGENCY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing revision 4 to Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.134, ‘‘Medical Assessment of Licensed SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM 06OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 60197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23802]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-255; NRC-2014-0216]


Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Palisades Nuclear Plant

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: 10 CFR 2.206 request; receipt.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is giving notice 
that by petition dated March 5, 2014, as supplemented by email dated 
May 21, 2014, Michael Mulligan (the petitioner) has requested that the 
NRC take enforcement action against Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., 
due to recent plant events and equipment failures at Palisades Nuclear 
Plant (PNP). The petitioner's requests are included in the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2014-0216 when contacting the 
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You 
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2014-0216. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-
3422; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and 
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, 
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The 
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this document 
(if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time 
that a document is referenced.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that by petition 
dated March 5, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14071A006), as supplemented 
by email dated May 21, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14142A101), and the 
petitioner's addresses to the Petition Review Board dated April 8 and 
September 3, 2014 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML14143A212 and ML14259A135, 
respectively), the petitioner, has asked the NRC to take enforcement 
action against Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., due to recent plant 
events and equipment failures at PNP. The petitioner was particularly 
concerned with primary coolant pump (PCP) impeller pieces breaking off 
and lodging in the reactor vessel.
    The petitioner requests the following actions:
     Require PNP to open every PCP for inspection and clear up 
all flaws.
     Require PNP to replace the PCPs with a design for their 
intended duty.
     An Office of Inspector General (OIG) inspection on why 
there are different analysis criteria for similar PCP events between 
the NRC regions.
     A ten million dollar fine for these events.
     Intensify NRC monitoring of PNP, and return them to yellow 
or red status.
    As the basis for the request, the petitioner stated, in part, the 
following:
     The petitioner cited other recent plant events and 
equipment failures, such as leakage from the safety injection refueling 
water tank, and flaws in the control rod drive mechanisms.
     The petitioner asserted the licensee and the NRC staff 
used non-conservative engineering judgment during the evaluation of the 
lodged PCP impeller piece and during the operability evaluation of the 
existing PCP impellers.
     The petitioner asserts that the NRC staff was not being 
aggressive in resolving plant equipment issues, not resolving PCP 
equipment issues uniformly across the NRC regions, and accommodating 
the nuclear industry.
    The request is being treated pursuant to Sec.  2.206 of Title 10 of 
the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), and has been referred to the 
Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR). In 
accordance with 10 CFR 2.206, the NRC will take appropriate action on 
this petition within a reasonable period of time. The petitioner met 
with the NRR's Petition Review Board on April 8 and September 3, 2014, 
to discuss the petition. The Petition Review Board considered the 
results of that discussion in its determination of the petitioner's 
request for immediate action and in the establishment of the schedule 
for the review of the petition.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of September 2014.

    For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Daniel H. Dorman,
Acting Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2014-23802 Filed 10-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P