Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Wisconsin; Revisions to PSD and NNSR Programs, 60064-60065 [2014-23769]
Download as PDF
60064
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 193 / Monday, October 6, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2014–0242; FRL–9915–94–
Region 5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Revisions to PSD and
NNSR Programs
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to its authority
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act),
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) is approving a revision to the
Wisconsin State Implementation Plan
(SIP) for the Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment
New Source Review (NNSR) programs.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
November 5, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2014–0242. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Anthony
Maietta, Life Scientist, at (312) 353–
8777 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anthony Maietta, Life Scientist, Control
Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR–18J), Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,
(312) 353–8777, maietta.anthony@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. Effective Date of Wisconsin’s Adopted
Rule and Formal SIP Submission.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Oct 03, 2014
Jkt 235001
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
I. What is the background for this
action?
On March 12, 2014, the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources
(WDNR) submitted a request to EPA to
revise portions of its PSD and NNSR
programs. The submittal requested that
EPA approve the following revised rules
into Wisconsin’s SIP: (1) NR
400.02(123m) and (124); (2) NR
405.02(21)(b)5.a. and b. and 6; (3) NR
405.02(25i)(a); (4) NR 405.02(25i)(ag)
and (ar)1–3; and (5) NR 408.02(20)(e) 5.a
and b. and 6. On May 2, 2014, EPA
published in the Federal Register (79
FR 25063) a proposal to take action on
portions of the March 12, 2014,
submittal that pertained to the
definition of ‘‘major modification’’, and
explicitly identify oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) as a precursor to ozone.
Specifically, EPA’s May 2, 2014,
proposed rulemaking was limited to the
following provisions: (1) NR
405.02(21)(b)5.a. and b. and 6; (2) NR
405.02(25i)(a); (3)NR
405.02(25i)(ar)(intro) and 1.; and, (4) NR
408.02(20)(e) 5.a and b. and 6. The
remainder of WDNR’s submission, as it
relates to the identification of precursors
to particulate matter of less than 2.5
micrometers (PM2.5), and the definition
of PM2.5 and particulate matter of less
than 10 micrometers, will be addressed
in a separate rulemaking.
Because the SIP revision was not
effective at the state level at the time of
the March 12, 2014, submittal,
Wisconsin requested that EPA parallel
process the SIP revision. EPA’s May 2,
2014, proposal was contingent upon
both the effectiveness of amended rules
at the state level and a formal, fully
adopted SIP revision request.
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
II. Effective Date of Wisconsin’s
Adopted Rule and Formal SIP
Submission
On June 30, 2014, revisions to
Wisconsin’s PSD and NNSR rules, as
submitted in draft to EPA on March 12,
2014, were published in the Wisconsin
Administrative Register, and became
effective on July, 1, 2014. On August 11,
2014, Wisconsin formally submitted its
request for EPA to take final action on
our May 2, 2014 proposal.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving revisions to
Wisconsin rules NR 405.02(21)(b)5.a.
and b. and 6; NR 405.02(25i)(a); NR
405.02(25i)(ar)(intro) and 1.; and NR
408.02(20)(e) 5.a and b. and 6., as
submitted by WDNR on August 11,
2014, into the Wisconsin SIP.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\06OCR1.SGM
06OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 193 / Monday, October 6, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by December 5, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Lead, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides.
Dated: August 19, 2014.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 52.2570 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(131) to read as
follows:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
§ 52.2570
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(131) On August 11, 2014, the
Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources submitted a request to revise
Wisconsin’s Prevention of Significant
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Oct 03, 2014
Jkt 235001
Deterioration and Nonattainment New
Source Review rules.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Wisconsin Administrative Code,
NR 405.02(21)(b)5.a. and b. and 6; NR
405.02(25i)(a); NR 405.02(25i)(ar)(intro)
and 1., as published in the Wisconsin
Administrative Register July 2014, No.
703, effective August 1, 2014.
(B) Wisconsin Administrative Code,
NR 408.02(20)(e) 5.a and b. and 6., as
published in the Wisconsin
Administrative Register July 2014, No.
703, effective August 1, 2014.
[FR Doc. 2014–23769 Filed 10–3–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0273; FRL–9914–97–
Region 5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Illinois;
Amendments to Gasoline Volatility
Standards and Motor Vehicle
Refinishing Requirements for Illinois
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving state
implementation plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency (IEPA) on March 19,
2013, concerning the state’s gasoline
volatility standards. The SIP revisions
also include amendments to the state’s
motor vehicle refinishing regulations to
allow for the alternative use of a high
volume, low pressure (HVLP) equivalent
coating applicator in motor vehicle
refinishing operations, and repeal a
registration program under these
regulations that overlaps with Federal
registration requirements.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective
December 5, 2014, unless EPA receives
adverse comments by November 5,
2014. If adverse comments are received,
EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2013–0273, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2450.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60065
4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief,
Control Strategies Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley,
Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2013–
0273. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
E:\FR\FM\06OCR1.SGM
06OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60064-60065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23769]
[[Page 60064]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0242; FRL-9915-94-Region 5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Revisions to PSD and NNSR Programs
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to its authority under the Clean Air Act (CAA or
Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a revision
to the Wisconsin State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review
(NNSR) programs.
DATES: This final rule is effective on November 5, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0242. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Anthony Maietta, Life
Scientist, at (312) 353-8777 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Maietta, Life Scientist,
Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8777, maietta.anthony@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. Effective Date of Wisconsin's Adopted Rule and Formal SIP
Submission.
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.
I. What is the background for this action?
On March 12, 2014, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
(WDNR) submitted a request to EPA to revise portions of its PSD and
NNSR programs. The submittal requested that EPA approve the following
revised rules into Wisconsin's SIP: (1) NR 400.02(123m) and (124); (2)
NR 405.02(21)(b)5.a. and b. and 6; (3) NR 405.02(25i)(a); (4) NR
405.02(25i)(ag) and (ar)1-3; and (5) NR 408.02(20)(e) 5.a and b. and 6.
On May 2, 2014, EPA published in the Federal Register (79 FR 25063) a
proposal to take action on portions of the March 12, 2014, submittal
that pertained to the definition of ``major modification'', and
explicitly identify oxides of nitrogen (NOX) as a precursor
to ozone. Specifically, EPA's May 2, 2014, proposed rulemaking was
limited to the following provisions: (1) NR 405.02(21)(b)5.a. and b.
and 6; (2) NR 405.02(25i)(a); (3)NR 405.02(25i)(ar)(intro) and 1.; and,
(4) NR 408.02(20)(e) 5.a and b. and 6. The remainder of WDNR's
submission, as it relates to the identification of precursors to
particulate matter of less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5), and
the definition of PM2.5 and particulate matter of less than
10 micrometers, will be addressed in a separate rulemaking.
Because the SIP revision was not effective at the state level at
the time of the March 12, 2014, submittal, Wisconsin requested that EPA
parallel process the SIP revision. EPA's May 2, 2014, proposal was
contingent upon both the effectiveness of amended rules at the state
level and a formal, fully adopted SIP revision request.
II. Effective Date of Wisconsin's Adopted Rule and Formal SIP
Submission
On June 30, 2014, revisions to Wisconsin's PSD and NNSR rules, as
submitted in draft to EPA on March 12, 2014, were published in the
Wisconsin Administrative Register, and became effective on July, 1,
2014. On August 11, 2014, Wisconsin formally submitted its request for
EPA to take final action on our May 2, 2014 proposal.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving revisions to Wisconsin rules NR 405.02(21)(b)5.a.
and b. and 6; NR 405.02(25i)(a); NR 405.02(25i)(ar)(intro) and 1.; and
NR 408.02(20)(e) 5.a and b. and 6., as submitted by WDNR on August 11,
2014, into the Wisconsin SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
[[Page 60065]]
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by December 5, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: August 19, 2014.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. Section 52.2570 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(131) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.2570 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(131) On August 11, 2014, the Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources submitted a request to revise Wisconsin's Prevention of
Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review rules.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Wisconsin Administrative Code, NR 405.02(21)(b)5.a. and b. and
6; NR 405.02(25i)(a); NR 405.02(25i)(ar)(intro) and 1., as published in
the Wisconsin Administrative Register July 2014, No. 703, effective
August 1, 2014.
(B) Wisconsin Administrative Code, NR 408.02(20)(e) 5.a and b. and
6., as published in the Wisconsin Administrative Register July 2014,
No. 703, effective August 1, 2014.
[FR Doc. 2014-23769 Filed 10-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P