Airworthiness Directives; Alpha Aviation Concept Limited Airplanes, 59465-59467 [2014-23554]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 191 / Thursday, October 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Rolls-Royce Corporation (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Allison Engine
Company and Allison Gas Turbine
Division of General Motors): Docket No.
FAA–2011–0961; Directorate Identifier
2011–NE–22–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
AD action by December 1, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2012–14–06,
Amendment 39–17120 (77 FR 40479, July 10,
2012).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Rolls-Royce
Corporation (RRC) 250–B17, –B17B, –B17C,
–B17D, –B17E, –B17F, –B17F/1, –B17F/2
turboprop engines; and RRC 250–C20,
–C20B, –C20F, –C20J, –C20R, –C20R/1,–
C20R/2, –C20R/4, –C20S and –C20W
turboshaft engines with 3rd-stage turbine
wheel, part number (P/N) 23065818, and 4thstage turbine wheel, P/N 23055944, installed.
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by investigations
that revealed that not all 3rd-stage and 4thstage turbine wheel blade failures were
identified by the one-time inspections
required by AD 2012–14–06, Amendment
39–17120 (77 FR 40479, July 10, 2012). We
determined that to address the unsafe
condition, repetitive inspections are
required, triggered by hours since last
inspection (HSLI) or any hot start event. We
are issuing this AD to prevent failure of 3rdstage and 4th-stage turbine wheel blades,
which could cause engine failure and damage
to the aircraft.
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done. After the effective date of this AD:
(1) Within 1,750 HSLI, remove the affected
turbine wheels and perform a visual
inspection and a fluorescent-penetrant
inspection (FPI) on the removed turbine
wheels for cracks at the trailing edge of the
turbine blades near the fillet at the rim.
(2) Any time there is a hot start,
immediately perform a visual inspection and
an FPI on the affected turbine wheels for
cracks at the trailing edge of the turbine
blades, near the fillet at the rim.
(3) Any time the power turbine is
disassembled, perform a visual inspection
and an FPI on the affected turbine wheels for
cracks at the trailing edge of the turbine
blades, near the fillet at the rim.
(4) Thereafter, re-inspect every 1,750 HSLI.
(5) Do not return to service any turbine
wheels that have cracks detected.
(f) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, an engine hot
start is any time the turbine temperature
exceeds 1,490 °F for 10 seconds or more, or
exceeds 1,700 °F for any duration.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Chicago Aircraft
Certification Office, may approve AMOCs for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:00 Oct 01, 2014
Jkt 235001
this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19 to make your request.
(h) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact John Tallarovic, Aerospace Engineer,
Chicago Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
2300 E. Devon Ave., Des Plaines, IL 60018;
phone: 847–294–8180; fax: 847–294–7834;
email: john.m.tallarovic@faa.gov.
(2) RRC Alert Commercial Engine Bulletin
(CEB) No. CEB–A–1407, Revision 3, dated
May 19, 2014, and CEB No. CEB–A–72–4098,
Revision 3, dated May 19, 2014 (combined
into one document), which are not
incorporated by reference in this AD, can be
obtained from RRC, using the contact
information in paragraph (h)(3) of this AD.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Rolls-Royce Corporation
Customer Support, 450 South Meridian
Street, Indianapolis, IN 46225–1103; phone:
888–255–4766 or 317–230–2720; email:
helicoptercustsupp@rolls-royce.com;
Internet: www.rolls-royce.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA 01803. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
781–238–7125.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
September 23, 2014.
Colleen M. D’Alessandro,
Assistant Directorate Manager, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–23553 Filed 10–1–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0759; Directorate
Identifier 2014–CE–028–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Alpha
Aviation Concept Limited Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Alpha Aviation Concept Limited Model
R2160 airplanes. This proposed AD
results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as paint adherence defects
inside the engine air intake box and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59465
cohesion defects inside the laminated
ducting from the filter to the air intake
box. We are issuing this proposed AD to
require actions to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 17,
2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Alpha
Aviation, 59 Hautapu Road, RD 1,
Cambridge 3493, New Zealand;
telephone: +64 7 827 0528; fax: +64 7
929 2878; Internet:
www.alphaaviation.co.nz. You may
review this referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call (816) 329–4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
0759; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl
Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
phone: (816) 329–4123; fax: (816) 329–
4090; email: karl.schletzbaum@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
E:\FR\FM\02OCP1.SGM
02OCP1
59466
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 191 / Thursday, October 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2014–0759; Directorate Identifier
2014–CE–028–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA),
which is the aviation authority for New
Zealand, has issued AD DCA/R2000/
25A, dated August 28, 2014 (referred to
after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an
unsafe condition for Alpha Aviation
Concept Limited Model R2160 airplanes
and was based on mandatory continuing
airworthiness information originated by
an aviation authority of another country.
The MCAI states:
To prevent loss of engine power due to a
possible paint adherence defect inside the
engine air intake box, accomplish the
following:
Inspect the engine air intake box (including
the deflection flap) and the engine air intake
ducting (include the area downstream of the
filter) per Alpha Aviation Service Bulletin
No. AA–SB–71–007 dated August 2014 or
later approved revisions.
If any defects are found, replace affected
parts per SB No. AA–SB–71–007 before
further flight.
You may examine the MCAI on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2014–0759.
Relevant Service Information
Alpha Aviation Concept Limited has
issued Alpha Aviation Service Bulletin
AA–SB–71–007, Revision 0, dated
August 2014. The actions described in
this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI.
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, they have notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:00 Oct 01, 2014
Jkt 235001
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
will affect 10 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $850, or $85 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions would take
about 6 work-hours and require parts
costing $1,000, for a cost of $1,510 per
product. We have no way of
determining the number of products
that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Amend § 39.13 by adding the
following new AD:
■
Alpha Aviation Concept Limited: Docket No.
FAA–2014–0759; Directorate Identifier
2014–CE–028–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by November
17, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Alpha Aviation
Concept Limited Model R2160 airplanes,
serial numbers 001 to 378, certificated in any
category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 73: Engine Fuel & Control.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI
describes the unsafe condition as paint
adherence defects inside the engine air intake
box and cohesion defects inside the
laminated ducting from the filter to the air
intake box. We are issuing this proposed AD
to prevent paint defects from entering the
engine which could cause loss of power.
(f) Actions and Compliance
Unless already done, do the actions in
paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(4) of this AD: (1)
Within the next 100 hours time-in-service
(TIS) after the effective date of this AD and
repetitively thereafter every 100 hours TIS,
inspect any painted engine air intake box
(including the deflection flap) and the air
E:\FR\FM\02OCP1.SGM
02OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 191 / Thursday, October 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules
intake ducting (including the area
downstream of the filter) for paint adherence
defects such as peeling, blistering, or
bubbling following Alpha Aviation Service
Bulletin (SB) No. AA–SB–71–007, Revision
0, dated August 2014.
(2) If any defects are found during the
inspection required in paragraph (f)(1) of this
AD, before further flight, replace the affected
parts with airworthy parts following Alpha
Aviation Service Bulletin No. AA–SB–71–
007, Revision 0, dated August 2014.
(3) As of the effective date of this AD, only
install new unpainted steel assembly air
intake boxes.
(4) The replacement of defective parts is
not a terminating action to the repetitive
inspection of painted engine intake
components required in paragraph (f)(1) of
this AD.
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; phone: (816) 329–4123; fax: (816)
329–4090; email: karl.schletzbaum@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in
the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(h) Related Information
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Authority
(CAA) AD DCA/R2000/25A, dated August 28,
2014, for related information. You may
examine the MCAI on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–0759.
For service information related to this AD,
contact Alpha Aviation, 59 Hautapu Road,
RD 1, Cambridge 3493, New Zealand;
telephone: +64 7 827 0528; fax: +64 7 929
2878; Internet: www.alphaaviation.co.nz.
You may review this referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329–4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
September 26, 2014.
Kelly A. Broadway,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–23554 Filed 10–1–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:00 Oct 01, 2014
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0521; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NE–11–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; CFM
International S.A. Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all CFM
International (CFM) S.A. CFM56–7B
series turbofan engines. This proposed
AD was prompted by a dual engine
thrust instability event that resulted in
the overspeed and in-flight shutdown
(IFSD) of one engine. This proposed AD
would require modification of the
engine by removing full authority digital
engine control (FADEC) software,
version 7BV4 or earlier, installed in the
electronic engine controls (EECs) on
CFM56–7B engines. We are proposing
this AD to prevent a thrust instability
event, which could lead to overspeed
and IFSD of one or more engines, loss
of thrust control, damage to the engine,
and damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 1, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact CFM International Inc.,
Aviation Operations Center, 1 Neumann
Way, M/D Room 285, Cincinnati, OH
45125; phone: 877–432–3272; fax: 877–
432–3329; email: geae.aoc@ge.com. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 781–238–7125.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59467
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
0521; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Caufield, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine
& Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: 781–238–7146; fax: 781–238–
7199; email: barbara.caufield@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2014–0521; Directorate Identifier 2014–
NE–11–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received reports of dual
engine thrust instability events on
CFM56–7B turbofan engines that
resulted in overspeed and IFSD of one
engine. These resulted from water-borne
fuel contamination of the fuel supply
causing a lag in the response of the
control valve in the fuel metering unit
(FMU). CFM has improved its FADEC
software to help prevent the lag in the
response of the FMU control valve,
thereby mitigating these thrust
instability events. This condition, if not
corrected, could lead to overspeed and
IFSD of one or more engines, loss of
thrust control, damage to the engine,
and damage to the airplane.
E:\FR\FM\02OCP1.SGM
02OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59465-59467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23554]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2014-0759; Directorate Identifier 2014-CE-028-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Alpha Aviation Concept Limited
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Alpha Aviation Concept Limited Model R2160 airplanes. This
proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as paint adherence defects inside
the engine air intake box and cohesion defects inside the laminated
ducting from the filter to the air intake box. We are issuing this
proposed AD to require actions to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 17,
2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Alpha Aviation, 59 Hautapu Road, RD 1, Cambridge 3493, New Zealand;
telephone: +64 7 827 0528; fax: +64 7 929 2878; Internet:
www.alphaaviation.co.nz. You may review this referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0759; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; phone: (816) 329-4123; fax: (816) 329-4090; email:
karl.schletzbaum@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about
[[Page 59466]]
this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0759; Directorate
Identifier 2014-CE-028-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed
AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), which is the aviation authority
for New Zealand, has issued AD DCA/R2000/25A, dated August 28, 2014
(referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for Alpha Aviation Concept Limited Model R2160 airplanes and
was based on mandatory continuing airworthiness information originated
by an aviation authority of another country. The MCAI states:
To prevent loss of engine power due to a possible paint
adherence defect inside the engine air intake box, accomplish the
following:
Inspect the engine air intake box (including the deflection
flap) and the engine air intake ducting (include the area downstream
of the filter) per Alpha Aviation Service Bulletin No. AA-SB-71-007
dated August 2014 or later approved revisions.
If any defects are found, replace affected parts per SB No. AA-
SB-71-007 before further flight.
You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-0759.
Relevant Service Information
Alpha Aviation Concept Limited has issued Alpha Aviation Service
Bulletin AA-SB-71-007, Revision 0, dated August 2014. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 10 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $850, or $85 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 6 work-hours and require parts costing $1,000, for a cost of
$1,510 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Alpha Aviation Concept Limited: Docket No. FAA-2014-0759;
Directorate Identifier 2014-CE-028-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by November 17, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Alpha Aviation Concept Limited Model R2160
airplanes, serial numbers 001 to 378, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 73: Engine Fuel
& Control.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as paint adherence
defects inside the engine air intake box and cohesion defects inside
the laminated ducting from the filter to the air intake box. We are
issuing this proposed AD to prevent paint defects from entering the
engine which could cause loss of power.
(f) Actions and Compliance
Unless already done, do the actions in paragraphs (f)(1) through
(f)(4) of this AD: (1) Within the next 100 hours time-in-service
(TIS) after the effective date of this AD and repetitively
thereafter every 100 hours TIS, inspect any painted engine air
intake box (including the deflection flap) and the air
[[Page 59467]]
intake ducting (including the area downstream of the filter) for
paint adherence defects such as peeling, blistering, or bubbling
following Alpha Aviation Service Bulletin (SB) No. AA-SB-71-007,
Revision 0, dated August 2014.
(2) If any defects are found during the inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before further flight, replace the
affected parts with airworthy parts following Alpha Aviation Service
Bulletin No. AA-SB-71-007, Revision 0, dated August 2014.
(3) As of the effective date of this AD, only install new
unpainted steel assembly air intake boxes.
(4) The replacement of defective parts is not a terminating
action to the repetitive inspection of painted engine intake
components required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; phone: (816) 329-4123; fax: (816) 329-4090; email:
karl.schletzbaum@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(h) Related Information
Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) AD DCA/R2000/25A,
dated August 28, 2014, for related information. You may examine the
MCAI on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-0759. For service information
related to this AD, contact Alpha Aviation, 59 Hautapu Road, RD 1,
Cambridge 3493, New Zealand; telephone: +64 7 827 0528; fax: +64 7
929 2878; Internet: www.alphaaviation.co.nz. You may review this
referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on September 26, 2014.
Kelly A. Broadway,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-23554 Filed 10-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P