Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material-Written Reports and Clarifying Amendments, 57721-57725 [2014-22866]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 187 / Friday, September 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
have validly completed an election by
the current producers in the prescribed
election period must still annually
enroll as specified in subpart D for PLC
and ARC payments, as applicable.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 1412.72
Election period.
(a) The election period will be
conducted in a defined period as
announced by FSA. During the election
period, all current producers on a farm
must unanimously make the irrevocable
election as described in § 1412.71 to
preserve the payment eligibility of all
producers on the farm for 2014 and
determine whether the default election
(PLC) or elected option (either a
combination of ARC–CO and PLC or
ARC–IC) will apply to the farm.
(b) If an election is submitted by all
current producers on a farm as specified
in § 1412.71 and paragraph (a) of this
section, that election will be recognized
as valid for the farm in all 2014 through
2018 crop years unless any of the
following occur:
(1) The election is rescinded or
terminated by any current producer on
the farm in accordance with paragraph
(c) of this section during the election
period;
(2) The valid election is modified and
replaced by another valid election by all
current producers during the election
period;
(3) A subsequent valid election by all
current producers is made with FSA
during the election period; or
(4) FSA determines the election at the
time it was made was invalid for any
reason.
(c) At any time during the election
period, a current producer can rescind
or terminate an election by providing
written notice to FSA during the
election period. The written notice to
rescind or terminate must be physically
received by FSA for CCC during the
election period in order to be
recognized. Immediately following
receipt of such notice to rescind or
terminate, the farm will be viewed as
not having any effective valid election
(in other words, no valid election will
be determined to exist—even if there
was another previous election in effect
before the election that is rescinded, or
terminated as specified in with this
paragraph).
(d) FSA is under no obligation to
notify producers, owners, current
producers, or current owners on a farm
that an election has been rescinded or
terminated. Current producers of a farm
are solely responsible for filing a valid
election during the election period or in
whatever time remains in an election
period following the rescission or
termination of an election.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Sep 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
(e) FSA is under no obligation to
notify current producers, current
owners, producers, or owners or new
producers or owners of whether or not
a valid election exists or is in place or
whether any current producer has
rescinded or terminated an election.
However, FSA will respond to inquiries
regarding the status of election of a farm
by any current producer or current
owner on a farm including a producer
or owner who gains a producer or owner
interest on the farm during the election
period.
(f) The election period and final day
in that election period in which current
producers can unanimously and
irrevocably elect are not a compliance
requirement or provision. The
requirement of an election is mandated
in the 2014 Farm Bill and as such is not
subject to any of the equitable relief
provisions of 7 CFR part 718, subpart D.
Further, because the requirement of a
unanimous irrevocable election and
ramifications for not having a valid
election are specified in the 2014 Farm
Bill, FSA will not consider any
equitable relief. There are no late-file
provisions for election.
1412.73 Reconstitutions of farms and
election.
(a) If a new producer or new owner
gains an interest in a farm after the filing
of a valid election on that farm during
the election period, that new producer
or new owner, whether or not known to
FSA or the other producers or owners
on the farm, will be subject to any
previously submitted valid election
under §§ 1412.71 and 1412.72 unless
that new producer or new owner
modifies, rescinds, or terminates the
election as a producer or owner as
specified in § 1412.72(c) during the
remaining time in the election period.
(b) Any reconstitution request
initiated after August 1, 2014, will not
be made until after the end of the
election period specified in § 1412.72.
Following the close of the election
period in § 1412.72, a valid election on
any farm cannot be changed by any
reconstitution. This means that valid
elected farms can only be combined
with farms having an identical election
for each and every covered commodity
on the farm regardless of whether there
are any base acres for any and all
covered commodities on the farm.
Reconstitutions will not be permitted to
alter a valid election or the default
election that may apply to a farm.
§ 1412.74
Failure to make election.
(a) If all current producers on a farm
do not make a unanimous election
during the period specified in § 1412.72,
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57721
that farm will not have a valid election
and any producer on the farm is not
eligible for 2014 ARC or PLC enrollment
or payments.
(b) If a valid election is not made for
a farm, FSA will not make any
payments with respect to the farm for
the 2014 crop year and the producers on
the farm will default to a PLC election
for all covered commodities on the farm
for the 2015 through 2018 crop years.
PART 1416—EMERGENCY
AGRICULTURAL DISASTER
ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
17. The authority for part 1416
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Title III, Pub. L. 109–234, 120
Stat. 474; 16 U.S.C. 3801, note.
§ 1416.102
[Amended]
18. In § 1416.102, remove the
definitions for ‘‘limited resource farmer
or rancher’’ and ‘‘socially disadvantaged
farmer or rancher’’.
■
Signed on September 17, 2014.
Val Dolcini,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit
Corporation, and Administrator, Farm
Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014–22879 Filed 9–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 70
[NRC–2010–0271]
RIN 3150–AJ34
Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear
Material—Written Reports and
Clarifying Amendments
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is amending its
regulations related to reportable safety
events involving special nuclear
material. This rule increases the time
licensees are allowed to submit a
written follow-up report from within 30
days to within 60 days after the initial
report of an event, updates the reporting
framework for certain situations, and
removes redundant reporting
requirements. These amendments affect
a licensee or an applicant that is, or
plans to be, authorized to possess
greater than a critical mass of special
nuclear material. This action resulted
from a petition for rulemaking (PRM)
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
57722
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 187 / Friday, September 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
received by the NRC (PRM–70–8). As a
result of this direct final rule, the NRC’s
‘‘FCSS [Fuel Cycle Safety and
Safeguards] Interim Staff Guidance-12,
Revision 1, 10 CFR [Title 10 of the Code
of Federal Regulations] Part 70—
Reportable Safety Events’’ contains
minor editorial updates that reflect the
amendments.
DATES: This final rule is effective
January 26, 2015, unless a significant
adverse comment is received by October
27, 2014. If the direct final rule is
withdrawn as a result of such
comments, timely notice of the
withdrawal will be published in the
Federal Register. Comments received
after this date will be considered if it is
practical to do so, but the NRC staff is
able to ensure consideration only for
comments received on or before this
date.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2010–0271 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information for this final rule. You may
access publicly-available information
related to this final rule by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2010–0271. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
final rule.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
a document is referenced. The NRC’s
‘‘FCSS Interim Staff Guidance-12,
Revision 1, 10 CFR Part 70, Appendix
A—Reportable Safety Events’’ will be
available in the NRC’s ADAMS
(ML14157A067).
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Sep 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keith McDaniel, Office of Federal and
State Materials and Environmental
Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
5252; email: Keith.McDaniel@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Procedural Background
II. Background
III. Discussion
IV. Section-by-Section Analysis
V. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
VI. Regulatory Analysis
VII. Backfitting and Issue Finality
VIII. Plain Writing
IX. Environmental Impact: Categorical
Exclusion
X. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
XI. Congressional Review Act
XII. Compatibility of Agreement State
Regulations
XIII. Voluntary Consensus Standards
I. Procedural Background
Because the NRC considers this action
to be non-controversial, the NRC is
using the ‘‘direct final rule process’’ for
this rule. The amendment to the rule
will become effective on January 26,
2015. However, if the NRC receives a
significant adverse comment on this
direct final rule by October 27, 2014,
then the NRC will publish a document
that withdraws this action and will
subsequently address the comments
received in a final rule as a response to
the companion proposed rule published
in the Proposed Rule section of this
issue of the Federal Register. Absent
significant modifications to the
proposed revisions requiring
republication, the NRC will not initiate
a second comment period on this action.
A significant adverse comment is a
comment where the commenter
explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule’s underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. A
comment is adverse and significant if:
(1) The comment opposes the rule and
provides a reason sufficient to require a
substantive response in a notice-andcomment process. For example, a
substantive response is required when:
(a) The comment causes the NRC staff
to reevaluate (or reconsider) its position
or conduct additional analysis;
(b) The comment raises an issue
serious enough to warrant a substantive
response to clarify or complete the
record; or
(c) The comment raises a relevant
issue that was not previously addressed
or considered by the NRC staff.
(2) The comment proposes a change
or an addition to the rule, and it is
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
apparent that the rule would be
ineffective or unacceptable without
incorporation of the change or addition.
(3) The comment causes the NRC staff
to make a change (other than editorial)
to the rule.
For detailed instructions on filing
comments, please see the companion
proposed rule published in the
Proposed Rule section of this issue of
the Federal Register.
II. Background
This rulemaking resulted from a
petition for rulemaking (PRM–70–8,
ADAMS Accession No. ML091110449),
dated April 16, 2009, filed by the
Nuclear Energy Institute (the petitioner).
The petitioner requested that the NRC
amend its regulations to clarify safety
event reporting requirements in
appendix A of part 70 of Title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR).
The NRC published the notice of
resolution and closure of the petition in
the Federal Register on October 18,
2010, (75 FR 63725) informing the
public that the NRC would consider five
of the nine issues raised in the petition
in the rulemaking process. One of the
five issues was addressed in a
miscellaneous administrative
rulemaking that was published
November 30, 2010, (75 FR 73935). The
remaining four issues are the subject of
this rulemaking.
III. Discussion
This rulemaking addresses four issues
that were raised in PRM–70–8 regarding
changes to appendix A to 10 CFR part
70. Paragraph (a) of appendix A lists
five events that must be reported to the
NRC Operations Center within 1 hour of
discovery. Paragraph (b) of appendix A
lists five events that must be reported to
the NRC Operations Center within 24
hours of discovery.
Two issues involve revising the
number of days that are allowed for a
licensee to submit the written follow-up
report from within 30 days to within 60
days after the initial report of an event.
The third issue involves removing
paragraph (b)(5) of appendix A on the
grounds that it is redundant to the
requirements in paragraph (b)(1) of
appendix A. The final issue involves
removing the reporting requirements in
paragraph (a)(5) of appendix A. The
NRC’s ‘‘FCSS Interim Staff Guidance-12,
Revision 1, 10 CFR Part 70, Appendix
A—Reportable Safety Events’’ will have
minor editorial updates to reflect the
amendments. The updated document
will be available in ADAMS (Accession
No. ML14157A067).
The criteria for reporting 1-hour and
24-hour events, and the criteria for the
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 187 / Friday, September 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
30-day follow-up written reports, were
developed as part of a larger revision to
10 CFR part 70 in 2000. That
rulemaking established subpart H of
part 70, which includes the 10 CFR
70.61 performance requirements for
identifying an item relied on for safety
(IROFS), and the submittal of an
Integrated Safety Analysis Summary
(ISAS) for NRC’s review. Lessons
learned from industry and from reports
the NRC has received since 2000 have
shown that the written follow-up
reports can be received within 60 days
after the initial report of an event
without weakening the performance
requirements. Extending the time
allowed to submit the written follow-up
reports provides an opportunity for a
licensee to complete a more thorough
investigation without compromising the
timely implementation of corrective
actions. This change does not impact
safety to the public, the environment, or
to the workers. The requirement to
notify the NRC Operations Center
within 1 hour or 24 hours, as
appropriate, after discovery of specified
events, remains unchanged.
The NRC is removing paragraph (b)(5)
of appendix A to 10 CFR part 70
because its requirements are redundant
to the requirements in paragraph (b)(1)
of the same appendix. Removing the
paragraph thus does not weaken these
performance requirements, or otherwise
impact safety to the public, the
environment, or the workers.
The NRC is also removing paragraph
(a)(5) of appendix A to 10 CFR part 70
because this provision is not riskinformed and is overly restrictive. This
requirement specifies that, within 1
hour of discovery, licensees must report
any loss of controls that leave only one
IROFS, as documented in the ISAS,
available and reliable to prevent a
nuclear criticality accident. Paragraph
(a)(5) further specifies that it is
applicable only when this situation has
lasted for more than 8 hours.
In the majority of the events reported
and reviewed under paragraph (a)(5)
since 2000, such an event would be
reported within 24 hours under
paragraph (b)(2), if it involves a loss or
degradation of IROFS resulting in a
failure to meet the performance
requirements. Other events now
captured by paragraph (a)(5) would be
of relatively low safety significance if
compliance with the performance
requirements was maintained. Also,
paragraph (a)(5) may require reporting
of conditions that are equivalent to what
is allowed by design.
Additionally, the reporting
requirement in paragraph (a)(5), as
explained in the 1999 statement of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Sep 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
considerations for the proposed rule
establishing subpart H of part 70, was
‘‘. . . intended to replace and expand
on the approach licensees have [used]
for reporting criticality events under
[NRC] Bulletin 91–01’’ (64 FR 41349),
July 30, 1999. The NRC’s Bulletin 91–
01 was based on reporting a loss of
double contingency protection.
However, controls used to meet the
double contingency principle (DCP) are
not necessarily IROFS, and there is no
requirement that these controls be
designated as IROFS. Also, having more
than one control is not necessarily
required to meet the DCP. Thus, having
only one IROFS remaining in a
criticality sequence does not necessarily
constitute a state in which double
contingency protection is not
maintained.
Based on the discussion above, the
NRC believes that paragraph (a)(5) of
appendix A may be removed without
weakening the performance
requirements or impacting safety to the
public, the environment, or to the
workers.
IV. Section-by-Section Analysis
The following paragraphs describe the
specific changes proposed by this
rulemaking.
Reporting Requirements (§ 70.50)
Paragraph (c)(2) is amended to remove
references to § 70.74 and appendix A
because of changes made to § 70.74 as
related to the time for a licensee to
submit a written report following a
reportable event.
Additional Reporting Requirements
(§ 70.74)
Paragraph (b) is amended to change
the time for a licensee to submit a
written report following a reportable
event described in appendix A from
within 30 days to within 60 days.
Clarifications for where to send the
follow-up report as well as, the
information contained in the report, are
also added.
Reportable Safety Events (Appendix A
to Part 70)
Paragraph (a) is amended by changing
the time for a licensee to submit a
written report following a reportable
event from within 30 days to within 60
days.
Paragraph (a)(5) is deleted as it is not
needed.
Paragraph (b) is amended by changing
the time for a licensee to submit a
written report following a reportable
event from within 30 days to within 60
days.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57723
Paragraph (b)(5) is deleted because it
is redundant to the reporting
requirements in paragraph (b)(1) of
appendix A.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the NRC certifies that
this direct final rule does not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This direct final rule affects only the
licensing and operation of facilities
under subpart H of 10 CFR part 70. The
companies that own these plants do not
fall within the scope of the definition of
‘‘small entities’’ set forth in the
Regulatory Flexibility Act or the size
standards established by the NRC (10
CFR 2.810).
VI. Regulatory Analysis
A regulatory analysis has not been
prepared for this direct final rule
because this rule is considered a minor
non-substantive amendment and has no
economic impact on NRC licensees or
the public.
VII. Backfitting and Issue Finality
The NRC has determined that the
NRC’s backfitting and issue finality
regulations in 10 CFR 50.109, 70.76,
72.62, 76.76, and in 10 CFR part 52, do
not apply to this direct final rule
because this amendment would not
involve any provisions that are subject
to these backfitting and issue finality
provisions. The direct final rule
addresses changes in the reporting
requirements for a licensee under
subpart H of 10 CFR part 70.
Information collection and reporting
requirements are not subject to the
NRC’s backfitting and issue finality
regulations. Further, as stated above,
lessons learned from industry and from
reports the NRC has received since 2000
have shown that the written follow-up
reports can be received within 60
days—rather than the currently-required
30 days—after the initial report of an
event, without adversely impacting
safety. This change is a voluntary
relaxation of NRC requirements and is
accordingly not subject to the NRC’s
backfitting and issue finality
regulations.
VIII. Plain Writing
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub.
L. 111–274) requires Federal agencies to
write documents in a clear, concise, and
well-organized manner. The NRC has
written this document to be consistent
with the Plain Writing Act as well as the
Presidential Memorandum, ‘‘Plain
Language in Government Writing,’’
published June 10, 1998 (63 FR 31883).
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
57724
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 187 / Friday, September 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
IX. Environmental Impact: Categorical
Exclusion
The NRC has determined that this
direct final rule is the type of action that
falls within the categorical exclusion
described in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(2). The
amendments to part 70 are corrective or
of a minor or nonpolicy nature and do
not substantially modify existing
regulations, and are actions on a
petition for rulemaking relating to these
amendments. Therefore, neither an
environmental impact statement nor
environmental assessment has been
prepared for this final rule.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
X. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
The burden to the public for these
information collections is neither
increased nor decreased due to the rule
changes; rather, the time frame for a
licensee to submit a written follow-up
report for a part 70 reportable safety
event has changed from within 30 days
to within 60 days. In addition,
information collections in part 70,
Appendix A(a)(5) and (b)(5) are deleted
because they are no longer needed or are
redundant with other part 70, Appendix
A reporting requirements. Further
information about information
collection requirements associated with
this direct final rule can be found in the
companion proposed rule published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register.
This direct final rule is being issued
prior to approval by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) of these
information collection requirements,
which were submitted under OMB
control number 3150–0009. When OMB
notifies us of its decision, we will
publish a document in the Federal
Register providing notice of the
effective date of the information
collections or, if approval is denied,
providing notice of what action we plan
to take.
Send comments on any aspect of
these information collections, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to
the FOIA [Freedom of Information Act],
Privacy, and Information Collections
Branch (T–5 F53), U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, or by email to
INFOCOLLECTS.RESOURCE@
NRC.GOV; and to the Desk Officer,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Sep 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, NEOB–10202, (3150–0009),
Office of Management and Budget,
Washington, DC 20503.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a request for information or an
information collection request unless
the requesting document displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
XI. Congressional Review Act
In accordance with the Congressional
Review Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801–808),
the NRC has determined that this action
is not a major rule and has verified this
determination with the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of
OMB.
XII. Agreement State Compatibility
Under the ‘‘Policy Statement on
Adequacy and Compatibility of
Agreement State Programs’’ approved by
the Commission on June 30, 1997, and
published in the Federal Register (62
FR 46517; September 3, 1997), this
direct final rule is a matter of
compatibility between the NRC and the
Agreement States, thereby providing
consistency among the Agreement
States and NRC requirements. The NRC
staff analyzed the rule in accordance
with the procedure established within
Part III, ‘‘Categorization Process for NRC
Program Elements,’’ of Handbook 5.9 to
Management Directive 5.9, ‘‘Adequacy
and Compatibility of Agreement State
Programs’’ (a copy of which may be
viewed at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/managementdirectives/). The Agreement States have
3 years from the effective date of the
final rule in the Federal Register to
adopt compatible regulations.
The NRC program elements
(including regulations) are placed into
four compatibility categories (See the
Compatibility Table for Direct Final
Rule in this section). In addition, the
NRC program elements can also be
identified as having particular health
and safety significance or as being
reserved solely by the NRC.
Compatibility Category A contains those
program elements that are basic
radiation protection standards and
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
scientific terms and definitions that are
necessary to understand radiation
protection concepts. An Agreement
State should adopt Category A program
elements in an essentially identical
manner to provide uniformity in the
regulation of agreement material on a
nationwide basis. Compatibility
Category B contains those program
elements that apply to activities that
have direct and significant effects in
multiple jurisdictions. An Agreement
State should adopt Category B program
elements in an essentially identical
manner. Compatibility Category C
contains those program elements that do
not meet the criteria of Category A or B,
but provide the essential objectives,
which an Agreement State should adopt
to avoid conflict, duplication, gaps, or
other conditions that would jeopardize
an orderly pattern in the regulation of
agreement material on a nationwide
basis. An Agreement State should adopt
the essential objectives of the Category
C program elements. Compatibility
Category D contains those program
elements that do not meet any of the
criteria of Categories A, B, or C, and
thus do not need to be adopted by the
Agreement States for purposes of
compatibility.
The Health and Safety (H&S) category
contains program elements that are not
required for compatibility but are
identified as having a particular health
and safety role (i.e., adequacy) in the
regulation of agreement material within
the State. Although not required for
compatibility, the State should adopt
program elements in this H&S category
based on those of the NRC that embody
the essential objectives of NRC program
elements because of particular health
and safety considerations. Compatibility
Category NRC are those program
elements that address areas of regulation
that cannot be relinquished to the
Agreement States under the Atomic
Energy Act, as amended, or provisions
of 10 CFR. These program elements are
not adopted by the Agreement States.
The following table lists the parts and
sections that would be revised and their
corresponding categorization under the
‘‘Policy Statement on Adequacy and
Compatibility of Agreement State
Programs.’’
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
57725
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 187 / Friday, September 26, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
COMPATIBILITY TABLE FOR DIRECT FINAL RULE
Compatibility
Section
Change
Subject
Existing
70.50(c)(2) ............................
70.74(b) ................................
Appendix A ...........................
Amend .................................
Amend .................................
Amend .................................
Reporting requirements .....................................................
Additional reporting requirements ......................................
Reportable safety events ...................................................
C ............
NRC .......
* .............
New
C
NRC
NRC
* Appendix A compatibility was not previously designated. As it is directly related to § 70.74 it is now designated as NRC.
XIII. Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–113), requires that Federal agencies
use technical standards that are
developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies unless the
use of such a standard is inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. In this direct final rule, the
NRC will revise the time allowed to
submit a written follow-up report from
within 30 days to within 60 days after
the initial report of an event, change the
reporting framework for certain
situations, and remove redundant
reporting requirements. This action does
not constitute the establishment of a
standard that establishes generally
applicable requirements.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 70
Criminal penalties, Hazardous
materials transportation, Material
control and accounting, Nuclear
materials, Packaging and containers,
Radiation protection, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Scientific
equipment, Security measures, Special
nuclear material.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble and under the authority of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974,
as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553;
the NRC is adopting the following
amendments to 10 CFR Part 70.
PART 70—DOMESTIC LICENSING OF
SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL
1. The authority citation for part 70
continues to read as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: Atomic Energy Act secs. 51, 53,
161, 182, 183, 193, 223, 234 (42 U.S.C. 2071,
2073, 2201, 2232, 2233, 2243, 2273, 2282,
2297f); secs. 201, 202, 204, 206, 211 (42
U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5845, 5846, 5851);
Government Paperwork Elimination Act sec.
1704 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note); Energy Policy Act
of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109–58, 119 Stat. 194
(2005).
Sections 70.1(c) and 70.20a(b) also issued
under secs. 135, 141, Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat.
2232, 2241 (42 U.S.C. 10155, 10161).
Section 70.21(g) also issued under Atomic
Energy Act sec. 122 (42 U.S.C. 2152). Section
70.31 also issued under Atomic Energy Act
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Sep 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
sec. 57(d) (42 U.S.C. 2077(d)). Sections 70.36
and 70.44 also issued under Atomic Energy
Act sec. 184 (42 U.S.C. 2234). Section 70.81
also issued under Atomic Energy Act secs.
186, 187 (42 U.S.C. 2236, 2237). Section
70.82 also issued under Atomic Energy Act
sec. 108 (42 U.S.C. 2138).
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
2. In § 70.50, revise the first sentence
of the introductory text of paragraph
(c)(2) to read as follows:
[Docket ID OCC–2014–0008]
■
§ 70.50
Reporting requirements.
*
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
12 CFR Part 3
RIN 1557–AD81
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Written report. Each licensee that
makes a report required by paragraph (a)
or (b) of this section shall submit a
written follow-up report within 30 days
of the initial report. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 70.74, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
12 CFR Part 217
§ 70.74
Regulatory Capital Rules: Regulatory
Capital, Revisions to the
Supplementary Leverage Ratio
Additional reporting requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Written reports. Each licensee that
makes a report required by paragraph
(a)(1) of this section shall submit a
written follow-up report within 60 days
of the initial report. The written report
must be sent to the NRC’s Document
Control Desk, using an appropriate
method listed in § 70.5(a), with a copy
to the appropriate NRC regional office
listed in appendix D to part 20 of this
chapter. The reports must include the
information as described in
§ 70.50(c)(2)(i) through (iv).
■ Appendix A to Part 70—[Amended]
■ 4. Amend appendix A to part 70 by:
■ a. In the introductory text to
paragraph (a), removing the number
‘‘30’’ and adding, in its place, the
number ‘‘60’’;
■ b. Removing paragraph (a)(5);
■ c. In the introductory text to
paragraph (b), removing the number
‘‘30’’ and adding, in its place, the
number ‘‘60’’; and
■ d. Removing paragraph (b)(5).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day
of September, 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Mark A. Satorius,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014–22866 Filed 9–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[Regulation Q Docket No. R–1487]
RIN 7100–AD16
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 324
RIN 3064–AE12
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Treasury; the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System; and the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In May 2014, the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (Board), and the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
(collectively, the agencies) issued a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR or
proposed rule) to revise the definition of
the denominator of the supplementary
leverage ratio (total leverage exposure)
that the agencies adopted in July 2013
as part of comprehensive revisions to
the agencies’ regulatory capital rules
(2013 revised capital rule). The agencies
are adopting the proposed rule as final
(final rule) with certain revisions and
clarifications based on comments
received on the proposed rule.
The final rule revises total leverage
exposure as defined in the 2013 revised
capital rule to include the effective
notional principal amount of credit
derivatives and other similar
instruments through which a banking
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM
26SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57721-57725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22866]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 70
[NRC-2010-0271]
RIN 3150-AJ34
Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material--Written Reports
and Clarifying Amendments
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending its
regulations related to reportable safety events involving special
nuclear material. This rule increases the time licensees are allowed to
submit a written follow-up report from within 30 days to within 60 days
after the initial report of an event, updates the reporting framework
for certain situations, and removes redundant reporting requirements.
These amendments affect a licensee or an applicant that is, or plans to
be, authorized to possess greater than a critical mass of special
nuclear material. This action resulted from a petition for rulemaking
(PRM)
[[Page 57722]]
received by the NRC (PRM-70-8). As a result of this direct final rule,
the NRC's ``FCSS [Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards] Interim Staff
Guidance-12, Revision 1, 10 CFR [Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations] Part 70--Reportable Safety Events'' contains minor
editorial updates that reflect the amendments.
DATES: This final rule is effective January 26, 2015, unless a
significant adverse comment is received by October 27, 2014. If the
direct final rule is withdrawn as a result of such comments, timely
notice of the withdrawal will be published in the Federal Register.
Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical
to do so, but the NRC staff is able to ensure consideration only for
comments received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2010-0271 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information for this final rule. You may
access publicly-available information related to this final rule by any
of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2010-0271. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-
3422; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this final rule.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time
that a document is referenced. The NRC's ``FCSS Interim Staff Guidance-
12, Revision 1, 10 CFR Part 70, Appendix A--Reportable Safety Events''
will be available in the NRC's ADAMS (ML14157A067).
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith McDaniel, Office of Federal and
State Materials and Environmental Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-
5252; email: Keith.McDaniel@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Procedural Background
II. Background
III. Discussion
IV. Section-by-Section Analysis
V. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
VI. Regulatory Analysis
VII. Backfitting and Issue Finality
VIII. Plain Writing
IX. Environmental Impact: Categorical Exclusion
X. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
XI. Congressional Review Act
XII. Compatibility of Agreement State Regulations
XIII. Voluntary Consensus Standards
I. Procedural Background
Because the NRC considers this action to be non-controversial, the
NRC is using the ``direct final rule process'' for this rule. The
amendment to the rule will become effective on January 26, 2015.
However, if the NRC receives a significant adverse comment on this
direct final rule by October 27, 2014, then the NRC will publish a
document that withdraws this action and will subsequently address the
comments received in a final rule as a response to the companion
proposed rule published in the Proposed Rule section of this issue of
the Federal Register. Absent significant modifications to the proposed
revisions requiring republication, the NRC will not initiate a second
comment period on this action.
A significant adverse comment is a comment where the commenter
explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. A comment is adverse and significant if:
(1) The comment opposes the rule and provides a reason sufficient
to require a substantive response in a notice-and-comment process. For
example, a substantive response is required when:
(a) The comment causes the NRC staff to reevaluate (or reconsider)
its position or conduct additional analysis;
(b) The comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant a
substantive response to clarify or complete the record; or
(c) The comment raises a relevant issue that was not previously
addressed or considered by the NRC staff.
(2) The comment proposes a change or an addition to the rule, and
it is apparent that the rule would be ineffective or unacceptable
without incorporation of the change or addition.
(3) The comment causes the NRC staff to make a change (other than
editorial) to the rule.
For detailed instructions on filing comments, please see the
companion proposed rule published in the Proposed Rule section of this
issue of the Federal Register.
II. Background
This rulemaking resulted from a petition for rulemaking (PRM-70-8,
ADAMS Accession No. ML091110449), dated April 16, 2009, filed by the
Nuclear Energy Institute (the petitioner). The petitioner requested
that the NRC amend its regulations to clarify safety event reporting
requirements in appendix A of part 70 of Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR). The NRC published the notice of
resolution and closure of the petition in the Federal Register on
October 18, 2010, (75 FR 63725) informing the public that the NRC would
consider five of the nine issues raised in the petition in the
rulemaking process. One of the five issues was addressed in a
miscellaneous administrative rulemaking that was published November 30,
2010, (75 FR 73935). The remaining four issues are the subject of this
rulemaking.
III. Discussion
This rulemaking addresses four issues that were raised in PRM-70-8
regarding changes to appendix A to 10 CFR part 70. Paragraph (a) of
appendix A lists five events that must be reported to the NRC
Operations Center within 1 hour of discovery. Paragraph (b) of appendix
A lists five events that must be reported to the NRC Operations Center
within 24 hours of discovery.
Two issues involve revising the number of days that are allowed for
a licensee to submit the written follow-up report from within 30 days
to within 60 days after the initial report of an event. The third issue
involves removing paragraph (b)(5) of appendix A on the grounds that it
is redundant to the requirements in paragraph (b)(1) of appendix A. The
final issue involves removing the reporting requirements in paragraph
(a)(5) of appendix A. The NRC's ``FCSS Interim Staff Guidance-12,
Revision 1, 10 CFR Part 70, Appendix A--Reportable Safety Events'' will
have minor editorial updates to reflect the amendments. The updated
document will be available in ADAMS (Accession No. ML14157A067).
The criteria for reporting 1-hour and 24-hour events, and the
criteria for the
[[Page 57723]]
30-day follow-up written reports, were developed as part of a larger
revision to 10 CFR part 70 in 2000. That rulemaking established subpart
H of part 70, which includes the 10 CFR 70.61 performance requirements
for identifying an item relied on for safety (IROFS), and the submittal
of an Integrated Safety Analysis Summary (ISAS) for NRC's review.
Lessons learned from industry and from reports the NRC has received
since 2000 have shown that the written follow-up reports can be
received within 60 days after the initial report of an event without
weakening the performance requirements. Extending the time allowed to
submit the written follow-up reports provides an opportunity for a
licensee to complete a more thorough investigation without compromising
the timely implementation of corrective actions. This change does not
impact safety to the public, the environment, or to the workers. The
requirement to notify the NRC Operations Center within 1 hour or 24
hours, as appropriate, after discovery of specified events, remains
unchanged.
The NRC is removing paragraph (b)(5) of appendix A to 10 CFR part
70 because its requirements are redundant to the requirements in
paragraph (b)(1) of the same appendix. Removing the paragraph thus does
not weaken these performance requirements, or otherwise impact safety
to the public, the environment, or the workers.
The NRC is also removing paragraph (a)(5) of appendix A to 10 CFR
part 70 because this provision is not risk-informed and is overly
restrictive. This requirement specifies that, within 1 hour of
discovery, licensees must report any loss of controls that leave only
one IROFS, as documented in the ISAS, available and reliable to prevent
a nuclear criticality accident. Paragraph (a)(5) further specifies that
it is applicable only when this situation has lasted for more than 8
hours.
In the majority of the events reported and reviewed under paragraph
(a)(5) since 2000, such an event would be reported within 24 hours
under paragraph (b)(2), if it involves a loss or degradation of IROFS
resulting in a failure to meet the performance requirements. Other
events now captured by paragraph (a)(5) would be of relatively low
safety significance if compliance with the performance requirements was
maintained. Also, paragraph (a)(5) may require reporting of conditions
that are equivalent to what is allowed by design.
Additionally, the reporting requirement in paragraph (a)(5), as
explained in the 1999 statement of considerations for the proposed rule
establishing subpart H of part 70, was ``. . . intended to replace and
expand on the approach licensees have [used] for reporting criticality
events under [NRC] Bulletin 91-01'' (64 FR 41349), July 30, 1999. The
NRC's Bulletin 91-01 was based on reporting a loss of double
contingency protection. However, controls used to meet the double
contingency principle (DCP) are not necessarily IROFS, and there is no
requirement that these controls be designated as IROFS. Also, having
more than one control is not necessarily required to meet the DCP.
Thus, having only one IROFS remaining in a criticality sequence does
not necessarily constitute a state in which double contingency
protection is not maintained.
Based on the discussion above, the NRC believes that paragraph
(a)(5) of appendix A may be removed without weakening the performance
requirements or impacting safety to the public, the environment, or to
the workers.
IV. Section-by-Section Analysis
The following paragraphs describe the specific changes proposed by
this rulemaking.
Reporting Requirements (Sec. 70.50)
Paragraph (c)(2) is amended to remove references to Sec. 70.74 and
appendix A because of changes made to Sec. 70.74 as related to the
time for a licensee to submit a written report following a reportable
event.
Additional Reporting Requirements (Sec. 70.74)
Paragraph (b) is amended to change the time for a licensee to
submit a written report following a reportable event described in
appendix A from within 30 days to within 60 days. Clarifications for
where to send the follow-up report as well as, the information
contained in the report, are also added.
Reportable Safety Events (Appendix A to Part 70)
Paragraph (a) is amended by changing the time for a licensee to
submit a written report following a reportable event from within 30
days to within 60 days.
Paragraph (a)(5) is deleted as it is not needed.
Paragraph (b) is amended by changing the time for a licensee to
submit a written report following a reportable event from within 30
days to within 60 days.
Paragraph (b)(5) is deleted because it is redundant to the
reporting requirements in paragraph (b)(1) of appendix A.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the NRC
certifies that this direct final rule does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This direct
final rule affects only the licensing and operation of facilities under
subpart H of 10 CFR part 70. The companies that own these plants do not
fall within the scope of the definition of ``small entities'' set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act or the size standards established by
the NRC (10 CFR 2.810).
VI. Regulatory Analysis
A regulatory analysis has not been prepared for this direct final
rule because this rule is considered a minor non-substantive amendment
and has no economic impact on NRC licensees or the public.
VII. Backfitting and Issue Finality
The NRC has determined that the NRC's backfitting and issue
finality regulations in 10 CFR 50.109, 70.76, 72.62, 76.76, and in 10
CFR part 52, do not apply to this direct final rule because this
amendment would not involve any provisions that are subject to these
backfitting and issue finality provisions. The direct final rule
addresses changes in the reporting requirements for a licensee under
subpart H of 10 CFR part 70. Information collection and reporting
requirements are not subject to the NRC's backfitting and issue
finality regulations. Further, as stated above, lessons learned from
industry and from reports the NRC has received since 2000 have shown
that the written follow-up reports can be received within 60 days--
rather than the currently-required 30 days--after the initial report of
an event, without adversely impacting safety. This change is a
voluntary relaxation of NRC requirements and is accordingly not subject
to the NRC's backfitting and issue finality regulations.
VIII. Plain Writing
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-274) requires Federal
agencies to write documents in a clear, concise, and well-organized
manner. The NRC has written this document to be consistent with the
Plain Writing Act as well as the Presidential Memorandum, ``Plain
Language in Government Writing,'' published June 10, 1998 (63 FR
31883).
[[Page 57724]]
IX. Environmental Impact: Categorical Exclusion
The NRC has determined that this direct final rule is the type of
action that falls within the categorical exclusion described in 10 CFR
51.22(c)(2). The amendments to part 70 are corrective or of a minor or
nonpolicy nature and do not substantially modify existing regulations,
and are actions on a petition for rulemaking relating to these
amendments. Therefore, neither an environmental impact statement nor
environmental assessment has been prepared for this final rule.
X. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
The burden to the public for these information collections is
neither increased nor decreased due to the rule changes; rather, the
time frame for a licensee to submit a written follow-up report for a
part 70 reportable safety event has changed from within 30 days to
within 60 days. In addition, information collections in part 70,
Appendix A(a)(5) and (b)(5) are deleted because they are no longer
needed or are redundant with other part 70, Appendix A reporting
requirements. Further information about information collection
requirements associated with this direct final rule can be found in the
companion proposed rule published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register.
This direct final rule is being issued prior to approval by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) of these information collection
requirements, which were submitted under OMB control number 3150-0009.
When OMB notifies us of its decision, we will publish a document in the
Federal Register providing notice of the effective date of the
information collections or, if approval is denied, providing notice of
what action we plan to take.
Send comments on any aspect of these information collections,
including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the FOIA [Freedom of
Information Act], Privacy, and Information Collections Branch (T-5
F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or
by email to INFOCOLLECTS.RESOURCE@NRC.GOV; and to the Desk Officer,
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0009),
Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection
request unless the requesting document displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
XI. Congressional Review Act
In accordance with the Congressional Review Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C.
801-808), the NRC has determined that this action is not a major rule
and has verified this determination with the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs of OMB.
XII. Agreement State Compatibility
Under the ``Policy Statement on Adequacy and Compatibility of
Agreement State Programs'' approved by the Commission on June 30, 1997,
and published in the Federal Register (62 FR 46517; September 3, 1997),
this direct final rule is a matter of compatibility between the NRC and
the Agreement States, thereby providing consistency among the Agreement
States and NRC requirements. The NRC staff analyzed the rule in
accordance with the procedure established within Part III,
``Categorization Process for NRC Program Elements,'' of Handbook 5.9 to
Management Directive 5.9, ``Adequacy and Compatibility of Agreement
State Programs'' (a copy of which may be viewed at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/management-directives/). The Agreement
States have 3 years from the effective date of the final rule in the
Federal Register to adopt compatible regulations.
The NRC program elements (including regulations) are placed into
four compatibility categories (See the Compatibility Table for Direct
Final Rule in this section). In addition, the NRC program elements can
also be identified as having particular health and safety significance
or as being reserved solely by the NRC. Compatibility Category A
contains those program elements that are basic radiation protection
standards and scientific terms and definitions that are necessary to
understand radiation protection concepts. An Agreement State should
adopt Category A program elements in an essentially identical manner to
provide uniformity in the regulation of agreement material on a
nationwide basis. Compatibility Category B contains those program
elements that apply to activities that have direct and significant
effects in multiple jurisdictions. An Agreement State should adopt
Category B program elements in an essentially identical manner.
Compatibility Category C contains those program elements that do not
meet the criteria of Category A or B, but provide the essential
objectives, which an Agreement State should adopt to avoid conflict,
duplication, gaps, or other conditions that would jeopardize an orderly
pattern in the regulation of agreement material on a nationwide basis.
An Agreement State should adopt the essential objectives of the
Category C program elements. Compatibility Category D contains those
program elements that do not meet any of the criteria of Categories A,
B, or C, and thus do not need to be adopted by the Agreement States for
purposes of compatibility.
The Health and Safety (H&S) category contains program elements that
are not required for compatibility but are identified as having a
particular health and safety role (i.e., adequacy) in the regulation of
agreement material within the State. Although not required for
compatibility, the State should adopt program elements in this H&S
category based on those of the NRC that embody the essential objectives
of NRC program elements because of particular health and safety
considerations. Compatibility Category NRC are those program elements
that address areas of regulation that cannot be relinquished to the
Agreement States under the Atomic Energy Act, as amended, or provisions
of 10 CFR. These program elements are not adopted by the Agreement
States. The following table lists the parts and sections that would be
revised and their corresponding categorization under the ``Policy
Statement on Adequacy and Compatibility of Agreement State Programs.''
[[Page 57725]]
Compatibility Table for Direct Final Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compatibility
Section Change Subject ---------------------------------
Existing New
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
70.50(c)(2)..................... Amend.............. Reporting requirements. C.............. C
70.74(b)........................ Amend.............. Additional reporting NRC............ NRC
requirements.
Appendix A...................... Amend.............. Reportable safety *.............. NRC
events.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Appendix A compatibility was not previously designated. As it is directly related to Sec. 70.74 it is now
designated as NRC.
XIII. Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104-113), requires that Federal agencies use technical standards
that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies
unless the use of such a standard is inconsistent with applicable law
or otherwise impractical. In this direct final rule, the NRC will
revise the time allowed to submit a written follow-up report from
within 30 days to within 60 days after the initial report of an event,
change the reporting framework for certain situations, and remove
redundant reporting requirements. This action does not constitute the
establishment of a standard that establishes generally applicable
requirements.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 70
Criminal penalties, Hazardous materials transportation, Material
control and accounting, Nuclear materials, Packaging and containers,
Radiation protection, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Scientific equipment, Security measures, Special nuclear material.
For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization
Act of 1974, as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553; the NRC is adopting
the following amendments to 10 CFR Part 70.
PART 70--DOMESTIC LICENSING OF SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Atomic Energy Act secs. 51, 53, 161, 182, 183, 193,
223, 234 (42 U.S.C. 2071, 2073, 2201, 2232, 2233, 2243, 2273, 2282,
2297f); secs. 201, 202, 204, 206, 211 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5845,
5846, 5851); Government Paperwork Elimination Act sec. 1704 (44
U.S.C. 3504 note); Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-58,
119 Stat. 194 (2005).
Sections 70.1(c) and 70.20a(b) also issued under secs. 135, 141,
Pub. L. 97-425, 96 Stat. 2232, 2241 (42 U.S.C. 10155, 10161).
Section 70.21(g) also issued under Atomic Energy Act sec. 122
(42 U.S.C. 2152). Section 70.31 also issued under Atomic Energy Act
sec. 57(d) (42 U.S.C. 2077(d)). Sections 70.36 and 70.44 also issued
under Atomic Energy Act sec. 184 (42 U.S.C. 2234). Section 70.81
also issued under Atomic Energy Act secs. 186, 187 (42 U.S.C. 2236,
2237). Section 70.82 also issued under Atomic Energy Act sec. 108
(42 U.S.C. 2138).
0
2. In Sec. 70.50, revise the first sentence of the introductory text
of paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 70.50 Reporting requirements.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Written report. Each licensee that makes a report required by
paragraph (a) or (b) of this section shall submit a written follow-up
report within 30 days of the initial report. * * *
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 70.74, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 70.74 Additional reporting requirements.
* * * * *
(b) Written reports. Each licensee that makes a report required by
paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall submit a written follow-up
report within 60 days of the initial report. The written report must be
sent to the NRC's Document Control Desk, using an appropriate method
listed in Sec. 70.5(a), with a copy to the appropriate NRC regional
office listed in appendix D to part 20 of this chapter. The reports
must include the information as described in Sec. 70.50(c)(2)(i)
through (iv).
0
Appendix A to Part 70--[Amended]
0
4. Amend appendix A to part 70 by:
0
a. In the introductory text to paragraph (a), removing the number
``30'' and adding, in its place, the number ``60'';
0
b. Removing paragraph (a)(5);
0
c. In the introductory text to paragraph (b), removing the number
``30'' and adding, in its place, the number ``60''; and
0
d. Removing paragraph (b)(5).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of September, 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Mark A. Satorius,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-22866 Filed 9-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P