Special Conditions: Boeing Model 777-300ER, Single-Occupant, Oblique (Side-Facing) Seats With Inflatable Lapbelts, 57429-57431 [2014-22781]
Download as PDF
57429
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 186
Thursday, September 25, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0667; Special
Conditions No. 25–569–SC]
Special Conditions: Boeing Model 777–
300ER, Single-Occupant, Oblique
(Side-Facing) Seats With Inflatable
Lapbelts
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special condition; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for Boeing Model 777–300ER
airplanes with single-occupant, oblique
(side-facing) seats equipped with
inflatable lapbelts. This installation is
novel or unusual, and the applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for occupants of seats installed at an
oblique angle of 30 degrees to the
centerline of the airplane or for
inflatable restraint systems. These
special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is September 25,
2014. We must receive your comments
by November 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2014–0667
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:37 Sep 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://www.regulations.gov/,
including any personal information the
commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket Web site, anyone
can find and read the electronic form of
all comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at https://DocketsInfo.
dot.gov./
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except federal holidays.
John
Shelden, Airframe and Cabin Safety,
ANM–115, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–2785; facsimile
425–227–1232; email john.shelden@
faa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The FAA
has determined that notice of, and
opportunity for prior public comment
on, these special conditions are
impracticable because such procedures
would significantly delay issuance of
the design approval and thus the
delivery of the affected airplane, and
such impracticability was not of the
applicant’s creation. The FAA therefore
finds that good cause exists for making
these special conditions effective upon
publication in the Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
We will consider all comments we
receive by the closing date for
comments. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we
receive.
Background
On July 18, 2014, Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124, applied for a type
certificate design change to type
certificate no. T00001SE to install
single-occupant seats installed at an
oblique angle to the centerline of the
airplane, and which are equipped with
inflatable lapbelts, in Boeing Model
777–300ER airplanes. The Model 777
series airplane is a swept-wing,
conventional-tail, twin-engine, turbofanpowered, transport-category airplane.
Amendment 25–15 to part 25, dated
October 24, 1967, introduced the subject
of side-facing seats and a requirement
that each occupant in a side-facing seat
must be protected from head injury by
a safety belt and a cushioned rest that
will support the arms, shoulders, head,
and spine.
Subsequently, Amendment 25–20,
dated April 23, 1969, clarified the
definition of sideward-facing seats to
require that each occupant of a seat that
is positioned at more than an 18-degree
angle to the vertical plane containing
the airplane centerline must be
protected from head injury by a safety
belt and an energy-absorbing rest that
supports the arms, shoulders, head, and
spine; or by a safety belt and shoulder
harness that prevents the head from
contacting injurious objects. The FAA
concluded that a maximum 18-degree
angle would provide an adequate level
of safety based on tests that were
performed at that time, and thus
adopted that standard.
Part 25 was amended June 16, 1988,
by Amendment 25–64, to revise the
emergency-landing conditions that must
be considered in the design of the
airplane. Amendment 25–64 revised the
static-load conditions in § 25.561, and
added a new § 25.562 that required
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
57430
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 186 / Thursday, September 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
dynamic testing for all seats approved
for occupancy during takeoff and
landing. The intent of Amendment 25–
64 is to provide an improved level of
safety for occupants on transportcategory airplanes. Because most seating
is forward-facing on transport-category
airplanes, the pass/fail criteria
developed in Amendment 25–64
focused primarily on these seats. As a
result, the FAA issued Policy
Memorandums ANM–03–115–30 and
PS–ANM–100–2000–00123 to provide
additional guidance to demonstrate the
level of safety required by the
regulations for side-facing seats.
To address more recent research
findings, the FAA developed a
methodology to address all fully sidefacing seats (i.e, seats oriented in the
airplane with the occupant facing 90
degrees to the direction of airplane
travel) and has documented those
requirements in a set of proposed new
special conditions. In this regard, the
FAA has issued Policy Statement PS–
ANM–25–03–R1, which conveys revised
injury criteria associated with neck and
leg injuries.
The Model 777–300ER China Airlines
business-class seat installation is novel
or unusual in that the current
airworthiness standards, and the current
Model 777 side-facing-seat special
conditions, do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards, regarding
occupants’ neck and spine, for oblique
(side-facing) seat installation that
restricts the occupant’s knees/legs from
aligning with both the upper torso and
the impact vector during a forward
event. As such, the Boeing Company
proposes a revised seating configuration
that requires new special conditions.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR
21.101, Boeing must show that the 777–
300ER meets the applicable provisions
of 14 CFR part 25, as amended by
Amendments 25–128, except for earlier
amendments as agreed upon by the
FAA. These regulations will be
incorporated into type certificate no.
T00001SE after type certification
approval of the 777–300ER. The
regulations incorporated by reference in
T00001SE are as follows:
The type-certification basis for the
Model 777–300ER airplane is 14 CFR
part 25, effective February 1, 1965, as
amended by Amendments 25–1 through
25–98, including special conditions 25–
295–SC and 25–187A–SC. In addition,
the certification basis includes certain
special conditions, exemptions, or later
amended sections of the applicable part
that are not relevant to these proposed
special conditions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Sep 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Boeing Model 777–300ER
airplane because of a novel or unusual
design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of
§ 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, or should any other
model already included on the same
type certificate be modified to
incorporate the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Boeing Model 777–
300ER airplane must comply with the
fuel-vent and exhaust-emission
requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the
noise-certification requirements of 14
CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type-certification basis under
§ 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Boeing Model 777–300ER
airplane will incorporate the following
novel or unusual design features:
The seating configuration proposed by
Boeing in Certification Plan No. 13668,
‘‘Installation of B/E Aerospace Business
Class Seats on China Airlines (CHI)
WE501,’’ which consists of Super
Diamond model, oblique (side-facing),
business-class passenger seats,
manufactured by B/E Aerospace, in a
Boeing Model 777–300ER airplane.
These seats will also incorporate
inflatable restraints.
The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for
occupants of seats installed in the
proposed configuration. To provide a
level of safety equivalent to that
afforded to occupants of forward- and
aft-facing seats, additional airworthiness
standards, in the form of special
conditions, are necessary.
Although special conditions 25–295–
SC and 25–187A–SC already apply to
the 777–300ER, these do not directly
address the complex occupant-loading
conditions introduced by this oblique
(side-facing) seat configuration. In
addition, this seat-angle configuration is
not specifically addressed in Policy
Statement PS–ANM–25–03–R1, which
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
is intended to address fully side-facing
seats, i.e., 90-degree installation angle.
Discussion
Boeing’s proposed seating
configuration could introduce complex
loading of the occupant. In conjunction
with the 30-degree oblique (side-facing)
orientation of the seats, surrounding
structure restricts the occupant’s knees
and legs, in a forward event, from
aligning with both the upper torso and
the impact vector. In addition, the
inflatable lapbelt design, intended to
provide occupant restraint and injury
prevention, introduces a significant
rebound flail of the head and neck.
The level of safety intended by
current rules is that aircraft seating
configurations protect the occupant
from serious injury. Development
testing of the proposed seating
configuration has shown that the
inflatable restraint contributes to
loading of the head and neck in the fore
and aft directions, and has also
produced significant head twisting.
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) regulations
specify neck injury criteria for the 50th
percentile male as part of the FMVSS
No. 208 alternative test, S13.2.
Therefore, we find that it is appropriate
to adopt the same neck-injury criteria
used in the FMVSS 571.208, and
measure it using the FAA Hybrid III
anthropomorphic test dummy (ATD).
The neck injury criteria, called ‘‘Nij’’,
imposes critical limits for all four
possible modes of neck loading; tension
or compression combined with either
flexion (forward) or extension
(rearward) bending moment. The Nij is
defined as the sum of the normalized
loads and moments of the neck load
cells installed in the ATD. We will also
limit the head rotation based on existing
relevant research literature. Impact of
the neck with any surface could cause
serious neck injury from concentrated
loading; therefore these special
conditions do not allow such contact.
Preliminary results from FAAsponsored oblique-seat research indicate
that unrestricted flailing of the upper
torso during forward impacts can
produce significant injuries. Although
specific injury criteria to predict these
injuries is not yet available, limiting the
amount of forward flailing has been
observed to reduce the magnitude and
duration of spinal loading. Therefore,
these special conditions require that
seat designs limit the forward flail of the
upper body to reduce the risk of these
injuries.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 186 / Thursday, September 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Boeing
Model 777–300ER airplane. Should
Boeing apply at a later date for a change
to the type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
of airplane. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
Under standard practice, the effective
date of final special conditions would
be 30 days after the date of publication
in the Federal Register; however, as the
certification date for the Boeing Model
777–300ER airplane is imminent, the
FAA finds that good cause exists to
make these special conditions effective
upon publication in the Federal
Register.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the typecertification basis for Boeing Model
777–300ER airplanes.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Inflatable Lapbelt Special Conditions
The inflatable lapbelts must meet the
criteria of Special Conditions 25–187A–
SC.
Single-Occupant, Oblique (side-facing)
Seats Special Conditions
1. Longitudinal (16g) occupant injury
test(s), must be performed with the FAA
Hybrid III ATD, undeformed floor, most
critical yaw case(s) for injury, and with
all lateral structural supports (armrests/
walls). The criteria for the pass/fail
injury assessments are listed in special
conditions 2 through 5 in this section.
2. Existing Criteria: All injury
protection criteria of § 25.562(c)(1)
through (c)(6) apply to the occupant of
an oblique (side-facing) seat. Head
injury criterion (HIC) assessments are
only required for head contact with the
seat and/or adjacent structures. If there
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 Sep 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
is no apparent contact with seat/
structure but there is contact with an
inflatable restraint, the HIC15 score for
that contact must be less than 700.
3. Body-to-Wall/Furnishing Contact
Criteria: If an oblique (side-facing) seat
is installed aft of structure (e.g., an
interior wall or furnishing) that does not
provide a homogenous contact surface
for the expected range of occupants and
yaw angles, then additional analysis
and/or test(s) may be required to
demonstrate that the injury criteria are
met for the area which an occupant
could contact. For example, if difference
yaw angles could result in different
inflatable restraint performance then
additional analysis or separate test(s)
may be necessary to evaluate.
4. Neck-Injury Criteria:
a. In demonstrating that the design
meets the criteria of FMVSS 571.208,
the applicant must show the Nij to be
below 1.0, where Nij =Fz/Fzc + My/Myc,
and Nij intercepts limited to:
i. Fzc = 1530 lb for tension
ii. Fzc = 1385 lb for compression
iii. Myc = 229 lb-ft in flexion
iv. Myc = 100 lb-ft in extension
b. In addition, peak Fz must be below
937 lb in tension and 899 lb in
compression.
c. Rotation of the head about its
vertical axis relative to the torso is
limited to 105 degrees in either
direction from forward-facing.
d. The neck must not impact any
surface.
5. Spine and Torso Injury Criteria:
a. The shoulders must remain aligned
with the hips throughout the impact
sequence, or support for the upper torso
must be provided to prevent forward or
lateral flailing beyond 45 degrees from
the vertical during significant spinal
loading.
b. Occupant must not interact with
the armrest or other seat components in
any manner significantly different than
would be expected for a forward-facing
seat installation.
6. One longitudinal (16g) structural
test must be performed with the Hybrid
II ATD or FAA Hybrid III, deformed
floor, with 10 degrees yaw, and with all
lateral structural supports (armrests/
walls). Use existing structural pass/fail
criteria from § 25.562.
7. One vertical (14g) test must be
conducted with Hybrid II ATDs or FAA
Hybrid III. Use existing pass/fail
structural and injury criteria from
§ 25.562.
Note: The applicant must demonstrate that
the installation of seats via plinths or pallets
meets all applicable requirements.
Compliance with the guidance contained in
FAA Policy Memorandum PS–ANM–100–
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57431
2000–00123, dated February 2, 2000, titled
‘‘Guidance for Demonstrating Compliance
with Seat Dynamic Testing for Plinths and
Pallets,’’ is acceptable to the FAA.
Issued in Renton, Washington September
19, 2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–22781 Filed 9–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 91
[Docket No.: FAA–2014–0458; Amendment
No. 91–333]
RIN 2120–AA66
Airports/Locations: Special Operating
Restrictions
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
AGENCY:
This action amends the
Appendix listing airports/locations with
special operating restrictions in FAA’s
general operating and flight rules.
Specifically, this action adds an
additional entry for Houston, TX
(William P. Hobby Airport), and San
Diego, CA (Marine Corps Air Station
Miramar), to the Appendix, which lists
the airports where aircraft operating
within 30 nautical miles (NM) of the
listed airports, from the surface upward
to 10,000 feet mean sea level (MSL)
must be equipped with an altitude
encoding transponder. The FAA is
taking this action to correctly identify
applicable airports under the
appropriate sections in the Appendix.
DATES: Effective Date: November 13,
2014.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy and
Regulations Group, AJV–113, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
267–8783, email colby.abbott@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Title 14 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, part 91, appendix D,
section 1, lists the airports where
special operating restrictions apply.
Specifically, this section lists the
locations at which aircraft operating
within 30 NM of the listed airports,
E:\FR\FM\25SER1.SGM
25SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57429-57431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22781]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 186 / Thursday, September 25, 2014 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 57429]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2014-0667; Special Conditions No. 25-569-SC]
Special Conditions: Boeing Model 777-300ER, Single-Occupant,
Oblique (Side-Facing) Seats With Inflatable Lapbelts
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special condition; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for Boeing Model 777-300ER
airplanes with single-occupant, oblique (side-facing) seats equipped
with inflatable lapbelts. This installation is novel or unusual, and
the applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for occupants of seats installed at an
oblique angle of 30 degrees to the centerline of the airplane or for
inflatable restraint systems. These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary
to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is September 25,
2014. We must receive your comments by November 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2014-0667
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and
follow the online instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov./
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Shelden, Airframe and Cabin
Safety, ANM-115, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
425-227-2785; facsimile 425-227-1232; email john.shelden@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice of, and
opportunity for prior public comment on, these special conditions are
impracticable because such procedures would significantly delay
issuance of the design approval and thus the delivery of the affected
airplane, and such impracticability was not of the applicant's
creation. The FAA therefore finds that good cause exists for making
these special conditions effective upon publication in the Federal
Register.
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We may change these special conditions based on the comments
we receive.
Background
On July 18, 2014, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707,
Seattle, Washington 98124, applied for a type certificate design change
to type certificate no. T00001SE to install single-occupant seats
installed at an oblique angle to the centerline of the airplane, and
which are equipped with inflatable lapbelts, in Boeing Model 777-300ER
airplanes. The Model 777 series airplane is a swept-wing, conventional-
tail, twin-engine, turbofan- powered, transport-category airplane.
Amendment 25-15 to part 25, dated October 24, 1967, introduced the
subject of side-facing seats and a requirement that each occupant in a
side-facing seat must be protected from head injury by a safety belt
and a cushioned rest that will support the arms, shoulders, head, and
spine.
Subsequently, Amendment 25-20, dated April 23, 1969, clarified the
definition of sideward-facing seats to require that each occupant of a
seat that is positioned at more than an 18-degree angle to the vertical
plane containing the airplane centerline must be protected from head
injury by a safety belt and an energy-absorbing rest that supports the
arms, shoulders, head, and spine; or by a safety belt and shoulder
harness that prevents the head from contacting injurious objects. The
FAA concluded that a maximum 18-degree angle would provide an adequate
level of safety based on tests that were performed at that time, and
thus adopted that standard.
Part 25 was amended June 16, 1988, by Amendment 25-64, to revise
the emergency-landing conditions that must be considered in the design
of the airplane. Amendment 25-64 revised the static-load conditions in
Sec. 25.561, and added a new Sec. 25.562 that required
[[Page 57430]]
dynamic testing for all seats approved for occupancy during takeoff and
landing. The intent of Amendment 25-64 is to provide an improved level
of safety for occupants on transport-category airplanes. Because most
seating is forward-facing on transport-category airplanes, the pass/
fail criteria developed in Amendment 25-64 focused primarily on these
seats. As a result, the FAA issued Policy Memorandums ANM-03-115-30 and
PS-ANM-100-2000-00123 to provide additional guidance to demonstrate the
level of safety required by the regulations for side-facing seats.
To address more recent research findings, the FAA developed a
methodology to address all fully side-facing seats (i.e, seats oriented
in the airplane with the occupant facing 90 degrees to the direction of
airplane travel) and has documented those requirements in a set of
proposed new special conditions. In this regard, the FAA has issued
Policy Statement PS-ANM-25-03-R1, which conveys revised injury criteria
associated with neck and leg injuries.
The Model 777-300ER China Airlines business-class seat installation
is novel or unusual in that the current airworthiness standards, and
the current Model 777 side-facing-seat special conditions, do not
contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, regarding occupants'
neck and spine, for oblique (side-facing) seat installation that
restricts the occupant's knees/legs from aligning with both the upper
torso and the impact vector during a forward event. As such, the Boeing
Company proposes a revised seating configuration that requires new
special conditions.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101, Boeing must show that the
777-300ER meets the applicable provisions of 14 CFR part 25, as amended
by Amendments 25-128, except for earlier amendments as agreed upon by
the FAA. These regulations will be incorporated into type certificate
no. T00001SE after type certification approval of the 777-300ER. The
regulations incorporated by reference in T00001SE are as follows:
The type-certification basis for the Model 777-300ER airplane is 14
CFR part 25, effective February 1, 1965, as amended by Amendments 25-1
through 25-98, including special conditions 25-295-SC and 25-187A-SC.
In addition, the certification basis includes certain special
conditions, exemptions, or later amended sections of the applicable
part that are not relevant to these proposed special conditions.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Boeing Model 777-300ER airplane
because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, or should any other model already included on
the same type certificate be modified to incorporate the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the
other model.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Boeing Model 777-300ER airplane must comply with the
fuel-vent and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the
noise-certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type-
certification basis under Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Boeing Model 777-300ER airplane will incorporate the following
novel or unusual design features:
The seating configuration proposed by Boeing in Certification Plan
No. 13668, ``Installation of B/E Aerospace Business Class Seats on
China Airlines (CHI) WE501,'' which consists of Super Diamond model,
oblique (side-facing), business-class passenger seats, manufactured by
B/E Aerospace, in a Boeing Model 777-300ER airplane. These seats will
also incorporate inflatable restraints.
The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for occupants of seats installed in the
proposed configuration. To provide a level of safety equivalent to that
afforded to occupants of forward- and aft-facing seats, additional
airworthiness standards, in the form of special conditions, are
necessary.
Although special conditions 25-295-SC and 25-187A-SC already apply
to the 777-300ER, these do not directly address the complex occupant-
loading conditions introduced by this oblique (side-facing) seat
configuration. In addition, this seat-angle configuration is not
specifically addressed in Policy Statement PS-ANM-25-03-R1, which is
intended to address fully side-facing seats, i.e., 90-degree
installation angle.
Discussion
Boeing's proposed seating configuration could introduce complex
loading of the occupant. In conjunction with the 30-degree oblique
(side-facing) orientation of the seats, surrounding structure restricts
the occupant's knees and legs, in a forward event, from aligning with
both the upper torso and the impact vector. In addition, the inflatable
lapbelt design, intended to provide occupant restraint and injury
prevention, introduces a significant rebound flail of the head and
neck.
The level of safety intended by current rules is that aircraft
seating configurations protect the occupant from serious injury.
Development testing of the proposed seating configuration has shown
that the inflatable restraint contributes to loading of the head and
neck in the fore and aft directions, and has also produced significant
head twisting. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
regulations specify neck injury criteria for the 50th percentile male
as part of the FMVSS No. 208 alternative test, S13.2. Therefore, we
find that it is appropriate to adopt the same neck-injury criteria used
in the FMVSS 571.208, and measure it using the FAA Hybrid III
anthropomorphic test dummy (ATD). The neck injury criteria, called
``Nij'', imposes critical limits for all four possible modes
of neck loading; tension or compression combined with either flexion
(forward) or extension (rearward) bending moment. The Nij is
defined as the sum of the normalized loads and moments of the neck load
cells installed in the ATD. We will also limit the head rotation based
on existing relevant research literature. Impact of the neck with any
surface could cause serious neck injury from concentrated loading;
therefore these special conditions do not allow such contact.
Preliminary results from FAA-sponsored oblique-seat research
indicate that unrestricted flailing of the upper torso during forward
impacts can produce significant injuries. Although specific injury
criteria to predict these injuries is not yet available, limiting the
amount of forward flailing has been observed to reduce the magnitude
and duration of spinal loading. Therefore, these special conditions
require that seat designs limit the forward flail of the upper body to
reduce the risk of these injuries.
These special conditions contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers necessary to
[[Page 57431]]
establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Boeing Model 777-300ER airplane. Should Boeing apply at a later date
for a change to the type certificate to include another model
incorporating the same novel or unusual design feature, the special
conditions would apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability.
Under standard practice, the effective date of final special
conditions would be 30 days after the date of publication in the
Federal Register; however, as the certification date for the Boeing
Model 777-300ER airplane is imminent, the FAA finds that good cause
exists to make these special conditions effective upon publication in
the Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type-certification basis for Boeing Model 777-300ER airplanes.
Inflatable Lapbelt Special Conditions
The inflatable lapbelts must meet the criteria of Special
Conditions 25-187A-SC.
Single-Occupant, Oblique (side-facing) Seats Special Conditions
1. Longitudinal (16g) occupant injury test(s), must be performed
with the FAA Hybrid III ATD, undeformed floor, most critical yaw
case(s) for injury, and with all lateral structural supports (armrests/
walls). The criteria for the pass/fail injury assessments are listed in
special conditions 2 through 5 in this section.
2. Existing Criteria: All injury protection criteria of Sec.
25.562(c)(1) through (c)(6) apply to the occupant of an oblique (side-
facing) seat. Head injury criterion (HIC) assessments are only required
for head contact with the seat and/or adjacent structures. If there is
no apparent contact with seat/structure but there is contact with an
inflatable restraint, the HIC15 score for that contact must be less
than 700.
3. Body-to-Wall/Furnishing Contact Criteria: If an oblique (side-
facing) seat is installed aft of structure (e.g., an interior wall or
furnishing) that does not provide a homogenous contact surface for the
expected range of occupants and yaw angles, then additional analysis
and/or test(s) may be required to demonstrate that the injury criteria
are met for the area which an occupant could contact. For example, if
difference yaw angles could result in different inflatable restraint
performance then additional analysis or separate test(s) may be
necessary to evaluate.
4. Neck-Injury Criteria:
a. In demonstrating that the design meets the criteria of FMVSS
571.208, the applicant must show the Nij to be below 1.0,
where Nij =Fz/Fzc + My/
Myc, and Nij intercepts limited to:
i. Fzc = 1530 lb for tension
ii. Fzc = 1385 lb for compression
iii. Myc = 229 lb-ft in flexion
iv. Myc = 100 lb-ft in extension
b. In addition, peak Fz must be below 937 lb in tension
and 899 lb in compression.
c. Rotation of the head about its vertical axis relative to the
torso is limited to 105 degrees in either direction from forward-
facing.
d. The neck must not impact any surface.
5. Spine and Torso Injury Criteria:
a. The shoulders must remain aligned with the hips throughout the
impact sequence, or support for the upper torso must be provided to
prevent forward or lateral flailing beyond 45 degrees from the vertical
during significant spinal loading.
b. Occupant must not interact with the armrest or other seat
components in any manner significantly different than would be expected
for a forward-facing seat installation.
6. One longitudinal (16g) structural test must be performed with
the Hybrid II ATD or FAA Hybrid III, deformed floor, with 10 degrees
yaw, and with all lateral structural supports (armrests/walls). Use
existing structural pass/fail criteria from Sec. 25.562.
7. One vertical (14g) test must be conducted with Hybrid II ATDs or
FAA Hybrid III. Use existing pass/fail structural and injury criteria
from Sec. 25.562.
Note: The applicant must demonstrate that the installation of
seats via plinths or pallets meets all applicable requirements.
Compliance with the guidance contained in FAA Policy Memorandum PS-
ANM-100-2000-00123, dated February 2, 2000, titled ``Guidance for
Demonstrating Compliance with Seat Dynamic Testing for Plinths and
Pallets,'' is acceptable to the FAA.
Issued in Renton, Washington September 19, 2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-22781 Filed 9-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P