Report on the Standardization of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies; Availability, 56816-56818 [2014-22513]
Download as PDF
56816
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Notices
device security benchmarks which are
continuously validated.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
III. Questions for Consideration
Food and Drug Administration
FDA also requests HPH Sector
stakeholders to provide perspective on
the following:
1. Are stakeholders aware of the
‘‘Framework for Improving Critical
Infrastructure Cybersecurity’’? If so, how
might we adapt/translate the Framework
to meet the medical device
cybersecurity needs of the HPH Sector?
2. How can we establish partnerships
within the HPH Sector to quickly
identify, analyze, communicate, and
mitigate cyber threats and medical
device security vulnerabilities?
3. How might the stakeholder
community create incentives to
encourage sharing information about
medical device cyber threats and
vulnerabilities?
4. What lessons learned, case studies,
and best practices (from within and
external to the sector) might incentivize
innovation in medical device
cybersecurity for the HPH Sector? What
are the cybersecurity gaps from each
stakeholder’s perspective: Knowledge,
leadership, process, technology, risk
management, or others? and,
5. How do HPH stakeholders strike
the balance between the need to share
health information and the need to
restrict access to it?
The deadline for submitting answers
to these questions for consideration and
any other additional comments on the
proposed workshop topics is October 7,
2014.
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0502]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. References
1. Executive Order 13636, ‘‘Improving
Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity,’’
Feb. 19, 2013, available at https://
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-02-19/
pdf/2013-03915.pdf.
2. Presidential Policy Directive 21, ‘‘Critical
Infrastructure Security and Resilience,’’
Feb. 12, 2013, available at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/
2013/02/12/presidential-policy-directivecritical-infrastructure-security-and-resil.
3. National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST), ‘‘Framework for
Improving Critical Infrastructure
Cybersecurity,’’ version 1, Feb. 12, 2014,
available at https://www.nist.gov/
cyberframework/upload/cybersecurityframework-021214-final.pdf.
Dated: September 17, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–22515 Filed 9–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:55 Sep 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
Report on the Standardization of Risk
Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies;
Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice; request for comments.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft report entitled
‘‘Standardizing and Evaluating Risk
Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies
(REMS)’’. This report describes the
Agency’s findings concerning strategies
to standardize risk evaluation and
mitigation strategies (REMS), where
appropriate, with the goal of reducing
the burden of implementing REMS on
practitioners, patients, and others in
various health care settings. As part of
the reauthorization of the Prescription
Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), FDA has
committed to standardizing REMS to
better integrate them into the existing
and evolving health care system. FDA is
publishing this report to allow the
public to provide comment on the
report as it relates to PDUFA.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments by November 24,
2014.
SUMMARY:
Submit written requests for
single copies of the draft report to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 2201,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft report.
Submit electronic comments to
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Currey, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6125,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–3918, FAX: 301–595–7910, email:
REMS_Standardization@fda.hhs.gov; or
Adam Kroetsch, Center for Drug
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 1192,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002; 301–
796–3842, FAX: 301–847–8443, email:
REMS_Standardization@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a draft report entitled ‘‘Standardizing
and Evaluating Risk Evaluation and
Mitigation Strategies (REMS).’’ This
report describes the Agency’s findings
concerning strategies to standardize
REMS, where appropriate, with the goal
of reducing the burden on practitioners,
patients, and others in various health
care settings. The Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (Pub. L. 110–85), enacted on
September 27, 2007, established FDA’s
authority to require REMS for
prescription drug and biological
products when it determines that such
a strategy is necessary to ensure that the
benefits of a drug outweigh the risks.
Since that time, REMS have become a
key tool in augmenting FDA’s drug
safety capacities. The Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act (FDASIA) (Pub. L. 112–144),
enacted on July 9, 2012, amended FDA’s
REMS authorities and strengthened the
Agency’s ability to safeguard and
advance public health. Among other
things, FDASIA reauthorized the
Prescription Drug User Fee Act (known
as ‘‘PDUFA V,’’ reflecting the fifth
reauthorization of PDUFA). As part of
its PDUFA V commitments, FDA agreed,
among other things, to ‘‘measure the
effectiveness of REMS and standardize
and better integrate REMS into the
health care system.’’ To this end, ‘‘FDA
will . . . continue to develop
techniques to standardize REMS and
with stakeholder input seek to integrate
them into the existing and evolving
(e.g., increasingly electronic) health care
system.’’ FDA also agreed to hold one or
more public meetings to explore
strategies to standardize REMS, where
appropriate, with the goal of reducing
the burden of implementing REMS on
practitioners, patients, and others in
various health care settings, and to issue
a report of the Agency’s findings
identifying at least one priority project
with a work plan for project completion
in the areas of pharmacy systems,
prescriber education, providing benefitrisk information to patients, and
practice settings.
FDA held a 2-day public meeting on
REMS Standardization and Assessment
on July 25–26, 2013, on approaches to
standardizing REMS and better
E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM
23SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Notices
integrating them into the health care
delivery system. A transcript of the
public meeting and a background
document, as well as FDA presentations
made at the meeting, are available on
FDA’s Web site at https://www.fda.gov/
forindustry/userfees/
prescriptiondruguserfee/
ucm351029.htm.
This report summarizes stakeholder
engagement achieved in fiscal year (FY)
2013, including suggestions and
recommendations received from
meetings, an expert panel workshop,
and comments received electronically
(posted to a Federal docket) and via
teleconferences. Stakeholder feedback
guided the Agency in selecting four
priority projects within the areas
specified by PDUFA V: (1) Providing
benefit/risk information to patients, (2)
prescriber education, (3) pharmacy
systems, and (4) practice settings. This
report briefly reviews the background
and context for REMS as well as FDA
initiatives for REMS administration and
program improvement, summarizes key
feedback from stakeholders and experts,
and presents the design and the
proposed workplans of projects in the
four designated priority areas.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Draft Report Describing Findings
Concerning REMS Standardization and
Plans for Projects To Standardize
REMS
A. Stakeholder Recommendations
Stakeholder input and
recommendations received by FDA in
2013 emphasize the need for better
communication by FDA about REMS,
improved leveraging of information
technology, and flexibility to tailor
REMS programs to specific health care
settings. The four priority projects that
are discussed in detail at the end of the
report flow, in part, from these
recommendations, and represent the
Agency’s next steps toward an improved
and integrated REMS strategy.
FDA found that stakeholders in
various settings have successfully
implemented REMS requirements, in
some cases developing systems to
manage REMS requirements specific to
their institutions and integrate the
REMS into their practices. However,
FDA also heard that REMS programs
affect specific stakeholder
responsibilities and organizational
structures differently, presenting a
central challenge to standardizing REMS
while meeting the needs of multiple
stakeholders across an array of health
care environments. Stakeholders
indicated that they want flexibility to
implement a REMS program based upon
the nature of the health care setting.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:55 Sep 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
Stakeholders emphasized that
communication by FDA about REMS
should be improved. They stated that
FDA communications about REMS are
often inadequate, inconsistent, unclear,
or too difficult to access, navigate, and
digest.
Stakeholders recommended that FDA
create more comprehensive, evidencebased, and organized communications
that can function within existing health
care systems; deliver clear, actionable
information to clinicians; and help to
ensure that patients receive the drugs
they require with excellent safety
monitoring and oversight. They
frequently suggested that FDA invest in
and improve leveraging of existing
information technology systems to
better integrate REMS into standard
medical practice and ongoing health
care delivery.
Several stakeholders noted that
current REMS documentation is not
standardized and generally cannot be
easily searched, queried, or managed.
They recommended Structured Product
Labeling (SPL) as a possible designated
standard that may allow for a
centralized, standardized REMS
information repository.
Several stakeholders expressed
interest in human factors evaluation
methods like Failure Modes and Effect
Analysis (FMEA) or a ‘‘Health Care
FMEA’’ that might be deployed to help
to develop criteria for levels of risk (e.g.,
illness, injury, death) that could prompt
regulatory action.
Stakeholders suggested that REMS
assessments might benefit from
leveraging of data sources (e.g.,
electronic health records, claims data) to
conduct assessments. A related
recommendation was that FDA assess
programs earlier and more frequently
throughout a product’s life cycle, and
apply information gleaned from
assessments to modify REMS if needed.
B. Priority Projects
Guided by stakeholder feedback and
recommendations, FDA has identified
four priority projects, one for each topic
area described previously. Each project
responds to input the Agency has
received regarding significant areas of
opportunity for REMS standardization
and evaluation efforts.
• Project 1: Providing Benefit-Risk
Information to Patients
This project aims to improve the tools
used for prescriber-to-patient counseling
about REMS drugs. To that end, FDA
proposes to conduct research into
existing REMS patient counseling tools,
other patient counseling initiatives, and
counseling literature to identify current
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56817
tactics and strategies for patient
counseling about medication benefits
and risk. The Agency intends to seek
feedback from a range of stakeholders to
identify opportunities to improve the
content, format, processes, techniques,
and delivery of effective counseling
within REMS programs. In addition,
FDA intends to develop a public report
of findings and counseling processes
and tools that could serve as the basis
for designing new tools and validating
them in demonstration projects.
• Project 2: Prescriber Education
Numerous stakeholders asked FDA to
facilitate the provision of health care
provider continuing education (CE) for
the education and training that is
provided in a REMS program. This
project will assess whether it is feasible
to provide CE certified by the
Accreditation Council of Continuing
Medical Education, Accreditation
Commission for Education in Nursing,
and Accreditation Council for Pharmacy
Education associated with a specific
REMS. FDA will seek to determine at
what stage in the drug approval process
CE development would best fit (e.g.,
before or after product approval) and
which CE model(s) would be best suited
for this type of activity; and provide an
analysis of the time and resource burden
associated with developing such CE
programs.
• Project 3: Pharmacy Systems
FDA proposes to identify an approach
for incorporating REMS information
into SPL. The project’s purpose is to
develop a method to share clear and
consistent information about the content
of REMS, including REMS documents,
requirements, and materials. Doing so
will, among other things, facilitate
integrating REMS into pharmacy
systems and health information
technology, including systems for
electronic prescribing. SPL will also
enable FDA to make structured REMS
information available to health care
providers and patients, and provide a
single conduit of comprehensive
information about REMS programs.
• Project 4: Practice Settings
The purpose of this project is to
provide a centralized, standardized,
reliable, and user-friendly repository of
information about REMS, including
stakeholders’ specific activities and
requirements under each REMS
program. FDA intends to develop its
REMS Web page as a central source of
REMS information, which will provide
stakeholders in a range of practice
settings with a reliable and accessible
resource to help them quickly learn
E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM
23SEN1
56818
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Notices
about REMS programs, understand and
comply with REMS requirements, and
compare requirements across REMS to
minimize confusion associated with
complying with multiple REMS
programs.
C. Scope of the Report
This report describes the Agency’s
findings concerning strategies to
standardize REMS where appropriate,
with the goal of reducing the burden of
implementing REMS on practitioners,
patients, and others in various health
care settings. This report contains
project plans to: (1) Increase access to
REMS-related information through the
use of SPL, (2) enhance the Agency’s
REMS Web page to better meet the
needs of stakeholders, (3) assess the
feasibility of using accredited CE
courses for prescriber training, and (4)
enhance existing tools for prescribers to
communicate with patients regarding
risks of drugs with REMS, and how
those risks should be weighed against
the potential benefits of the drug.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document on FDA’s Web
site at https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/
UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/
ucm350852.htm or https://
www.regulations.gov.
IV. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
document to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov. After
consideration of comments, FDA will
finalize the report and project plans.
The Agency intends to post updates to
the project plans on FDA’s Web site.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: September 17, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–22513 Filed 9–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:55 Sep 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Submission for OMB Review; 30-Day
Comment Request: State and
Community Tobacco Control Research
Initiative Evaluation (NCI)
Under the provisions of
Section 3507(a)(1)(D) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the National
Institutes of Health (NIH), has submitted
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request for review and
approval of the information collection
listed below. This proposed information
collection was previously published in
the Federal Register on June 6, 2014 (79
FR 32742) and allowed 60 days for
public comment. One public comment
was received. The purpose of this notice
is to allow an additional 30 days for
public comment. The National Cancer
Institute (NCI), National Institutes of
Health, may not conduct or sponsor,
and the respondent is not required to
respond to, an information collection
that has been extended, revised, or
implemented on or after October 1,
1995, unless it displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
Direct Comments to OMB: Written
comments and/or suggestions regarding
the item(s) contained in this notice,
especially regarding the estimated
public burden and associated response
time, should be directed to the: Office
of Management and Budget, Office of
Regulatory Affairs, OIRA_submission@
omb.eop.gov or by fax to 202–395–6974,
Attention: NIH Desk Officer.
Comment Due Date: Comments
regarding this information collection are
best assured of having their full effect if
received within 30 days of the date of
this publication.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
obtain a copy of the data collection
plans and instruments or request more
information on the proposed project
contact: Elizabeth M. Ginexi, Ph.D.,
Tobacco Control Research Branch,
Behavioral Research Program, Division
of Cancer Control and Population
Sciences, National Cancer Institute,
9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 3E564
MSC 9761, Bethesda, Maryland 20892–
9761 or call non-toll-free number 240–
276–6765 or email your request,
including your address to: LGinexi@
mail.nih.gov. Formal requests for
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
additional plans and instruments must
be requested in writing.
Proposed Collection: State and
Community Tobacco Control Research
Initiative Evaluation (SCTC), 0925–
NEW, National Cancer Institute (NCI),
National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Need and Use of Information
Collection: The National Cancer
Institute State and Community Tobacco
Control Research Initiative is a program
within the Tobacco Control Research
Branch in the Behavioral Research
Program of the Division of Cancer
Control and Population Sciences. The
program targets 4 high-priority tobacco
control research areas at the state and
community level in the United States:
(1) Secondhand smoke policies, (2)
Tobacco tax and pricing policies, (3)
Mass media countermeasures and
community and social norms, and (4)
Tobacco industry practices. The
initiative supports innovative research
to yield rapid and actionable findings
for state and community tobacco control
programs. The purpose of the evaluation
is to assess the dissemination,
implementation, and community
collaboration processes of the grantees
and their respective state and
community partners and stakeholders.
The evaluation will utilize archival
grant project data and archival data
collected from the scientists in the first
two years of the initiative. The
evaluation also will collect new data to:
(1) Determine relationships,
interactions, and connectedness among
different network partnerships over time
and with policy makers; (2) assess the
utility of research tools, interventions,
products, and findings from the
perspective of key tobacco control
stakeholders; and (3) determine key
indicators for broad adoption of
research products. Results will address
research-to-practice gaps by providing a
critical window into the process of
disseminating evidence-based research
tools, products, and science findings in
community public health settings.
Intended audiences include staff at NIH
Institutes and Centers interested in
supporting translation/dissemination
and implementation science.
OMB approval is requested for one
year. There are no costs to respondents
other than their time. The total
estimated annualized burden hours are
112.
E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM
23SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56816-56818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22513]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0502]
Report on the Standardization of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation
Strategies; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft report entitled ``Standardizing and Evaluating
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS)''. This report
describes the Agency's findings concerning strategies to standardize
risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS), where appropriate,
with the goal of reducing the burden of implementing REMS on
practitioners, patients, and others in various health care settings. As
part of the reauthorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act
(PDUFA), FDA has committed to standardizing REMS to better integrate
them into the existing and evolving health care system. FDA is
publishing this report to allow the public to provide comment on the
report as it relates to PDUFA.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments by November 24,
2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
report to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Bldg. 51, Rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one self-
addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft report.
Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in
the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Currey, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6125, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-3918, FAX: 301-595-7910, email:
REMSStandardization@fda.hhs.gov; or Adam Kroetsch, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 1192, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002; 301-
796-3842, FAX: 301-847-8443, email:
REMSStandardization@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a draft report entitled
``Standardizing and Evaluating Risk Evaluation and Mitigation
Strategies (REMS).'' This report describes the Agency's findings
concerning strategies to standardize REMS, where appropriate, with the
goal of reducing the burden on practitioners, patients, and others in
various health care settings. The Food and Drug Administration
Amendments Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-85), enacted on September 27, 2007,
established FDA's authority to require REMS for prescription drug and
biological products when it determines that such a strategy is
necessary to ensure that the benefits of a drug outweigh the risks.
Since that time, REMS have become a key tool in augmenting FDA's drug
safety capacities. The Food and Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (FDASIA) (Pub. L. 112-144), enacted on July 9, 2012,
amended FDA's REMS authorities and strengthened the Agency's ability to
safeguard and advance public health. Among other things, FDASIA
reauthorized the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (known as ``PDUFA V,''
reflecting the fifth reauthorization of PDUFA). As part of its PDUFA V
commitments, FDA agreed, among other things, to ``measure the
effectiveness of REMS and standardize and better integrate REMS into
the health care system.'' To this end, ``FDA will . . . continue to
develop techniques to standardize REMS and with stakeholder input seek
to integrate them into the existing and evolving (e.g., increasingly
electronic) health care system.'' FDA also agreed to hold one or more
public meetings to explore strategies to standardize REMS, where
appropriate, with the goal of reducing the burden of implementing REMS
on practitioners, patients, and others in various health care settings,
and to issue a report of the Agency's findings identifying at least one
priority project with a work plan for project completion in the areas
of pharmacy systems, prescriber education, providing benefit-risk
information to patients, and practice settings.
FDA held a 2-day public meeting on REMS Standardization and
Assessment on July 25-26, 2013, on approaches to standardizing REMS and
better
[[Page 56817]]
integrating them into the health care delivery system. A transcript of
the public meeting and a background document, as well as FDA
presentations made at the meeting, are available on FDA's Web site at
https://www.fda.gov/forindustry/userfees/prescriptiondruguserfee/ucm351029.htm.
This report summarizes stakeholder engagement achieved in fiscal
year (FY) 2013, including suggestions and recommendations received from
meetings, an expert panel workshop, and comments received
electronically (posted to a Federal docket) and via teleconferences.
Stakeholder feedback guided the Agency in selecting four priority
projects within the areas specified by PDUFA V: (1) Providing benefit/
risk information to patients, (2) prescriber education, (3) pharmacy
systems, and (4) practice settings. This report briefly reviews the
background and context for REMS as well as FDA initiatives for REMS
administration and program improvement, summarizes key feedback from
stakeholders and experts, and presents the design and the proposed
workplans of projects in the four designated priority areas.
II. Draft Report Describing Findings Concerning REMS Standardization
and Plans for Projects To Standardize REMS
A. Stakeholder Recommendations
Stakeholder input and recommendations received by FDA in 2013
emphasize the need for better communication by FDA about REMS, improved
leveraging of information technology, and flexibility to tailor REMS
programs to specific health care settings. The four priority projects
that are discussed in detail at the end of the report flow, in part,
from these recommendations, and represent the Agency's next steps
toward an improved and integrated REMS strategy.
FDA found that stakeholders in various settings have successfully
implemented REMS requirements, in some cases developing systems to
manage REMS requirements specific to their institutions and integrate
the REMS into their practices. However, FDA also heard that REMS
programs affect specific stakeholder responsibilities and
organizational structures differently, presenting a central challenge
to standardizing REMS while meeting the needs of multiple stakeholders
across an array of health care environments. Stakeholders indicated
that they want flexibility to implement a REMS program based upon the
nature of the health care setting.
Stakeholders emphasized that communication by FDA about REMS should
be improved. They stated that FDA communications about REMS are often
inadequate, inconsistent, unclear, or too difficult to access,
navigate, and digest.
Stakeholders recommended that FDA create more comprehensive,
evidence-based, and organized communications that can function within
existing health care systems; deliver clear, actionable information to
clinicians; and help to ensure that patients receive the drugs they
require with excellent safety monitoring and oversight. They frequently
suggested that FDA invest in and improve leveraging of existing
information technology systems to better integrate REMS into standard
medical practice and ongoing health care delivery.
Several stakeholders noted that current REMS documentation is not
standardized and generally cannot be easily searched, queried, or
managed. They recommended Structured Product Labeling (SPL) as a
possible designated standard that may allow for a centralized,
standardized REMS information repository.
Several stakeholders expressed interest in human factors evaluation
methods like Failure Modes and Effect Analysis (FMEA) or a ``Health
Care FMEA'' that might be deployed to help to develop criteria for
levels of risk (e.g., illness, injury, death) that could prompt
regulatory action.
Stakeholders suggested that REMS assessments might benefit from
leveraging of data sources (e.g., electronic health records, claims
data) to conduct assessments. A related recommendation was that FDA
assess programs earlier and more frequently throughout a product's life
cycle, and apply information gleaned from assessments to modify REMS if
needed.
B. Priority Projects
Guided by stakeholder feedback and recommendations, FDA has
identified four priority projects, one for each topic area described
previously. Each project responds to input the Agency has received
regarding significant areas of opportunity for REMS standardization and
evaluation efforts.
Project 1: Providing Benefit-Risk Information to Patients
This project aims to improve the tools used for prescriber-to-
patient counseling about REMS drugs. To that end, FDA proposes to
conduct research into existing REMS patient counseling tools, other
patient counseling initiatives, and counseling literature to identify
current tactics and strategies for patient counseling about medication
benefits and risk. The Agency intends to seek feedback from a range of
stakeholders to identify opportunities to improve the content, format,
processes, techniques, and delivery of effective counseling within REMS
programs. In addition, FDA intends to develop a public report of
findings and counseling processes and tools that could serve as the
basis for designing new tools and validating them in demonstration
projects.
Project 2: Prescriber Education
Numerous stakeholders asked FDA to facilitate the provision of
health care provider continuing education (CE) for the education and
training that is provided in a REMS program. This project will assess
whether it is feasible to provide CE certified by the Accreditation
Council of Continuing Medical Education, Accreditation Commission for
Education in Nursing, and Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education
associated with a specific REMS. FDA will seek to determine at what
stage in the drug approval process CE development would best fit (e.g.,
before or after product approval) and which CE model(s) would be best
suited for this type of activity; and provide an analysis of the time
and resource burden associated with developing such CE programs.
Project 3: Pharmacy Systems
FDA proposes to identify an approach for incorporating REMS
information into SPL. The project's purpose is to develop a method to
share clear and consistent information about the content of REMS,
including REMS documents, requirements, and materials. Doing so will,
among other things, facilitate integrating REMS into pharmacy systems
and health information technology, including systems for electronic
prescribing. SPL will also enable FDA to make structured REMS
information available to health care providers and patients, and
provide a single conduit of comprehensive information about REMS
programs.
Project 4: Practice Settings
The purpose of this project is to provide a centralized,
standardized, reliable, and user-friendly repository of information
about REMS, including stakeholders' specific activities and
requirements under each REMS program. FDA intends to develop its REMS
Web page as a central source of REMS information, which will provide
stakeholders in a range of practice settings with a reliable and
accessible resource to help them quickly learn
[[Page 56818]]
about REMS programs, understand and comply with REMS requirements, and
compare requirements across REMS to minimize confusion associated with
complying with multiple REMS programs.
C. Scope of the Report
This report describes the Agency's findings concerning strategies
to standardize REMS where appropriate, with the goal of reducing the
burden of implementing REMS on practitioners, patients, and others in
various health care settings. This report contains project plans to:
(1) Increase access to REMS-related information through the use of SPL,
(2) enhance the Agency's REMS Web page to better meet the needs of
stakeholders, (3) assess the feasibility of using accredited CE courses
for prescriber training, and (4) enhance existing tools for prescribers
to communicate with patients regarding risks of drugs with REMS, and
how those risks should be weighed against the potential benefits of the
drug.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document on
FDA's Web site at https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/ucm350852.htm or https://www.regulations.gov.
IV. Comments
Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to https://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at https://www.regulations.gov. After consideration of comments, FDA will
finalize the report and project plans. The Agency intends to post
updates to the project plans on FDA's Web site.
Dated: September 17, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-22513 Filed 9-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P