Report on the Standardization of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies; Availability, 56816-56818 [2014-22513]

Download as PDF 56816 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Notices device security benchmarks which are continuously validated. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES III. Questions for Consideration Food and Drug Administration FDA also requests HPH Sector stakeholders to provide perspective on the following: 1. Are stakeholders aware of the ‘‘Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity’’? If so, how might we adapt/translate the Framework to meet the medical device cybersecurity needs of the HPH Sector? 2. How can we establish partnerships within the HPH Sector to quickly identify, analyze, communicate, and mitigate cyber threats and medical device security vulnerabilities? 3. How might the stakeholder community create incentives to encourage sharing information about medical device cyber threats and vulnerabilities? 4. What lessons learned, case studies, and best practices (from within and external to the sector) might incentivize innovation in medical device cybersecurity for the HPH Sector? What are the cybersecurity gaps from each stakeholder’s perspective: Knowledge, leadership, process, technology, risk management, or others? and, 5. How do HPH stakeholders strike the balance between the need to share health information and the need to restrict access to it? The deadline for submitting answers to these questions for consideration and any other additional comments on the proposed workshop topics is October 7, 2014. [Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0502] mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES IV. References 1. Executive Order 13636, ‘‘Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity,’’ Feb. 19, 2013, available at https:// www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-02-19/ pdf/2013-03915.pdf. 2. Presidential Policy Directive 21, ‘‘Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience,’’ Feb. 12, 2013, available at https:// www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/ 2013/02/12/presidential-policy-directivecritical-infrastructure-security-and-resil. 3. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), ‘‘Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity,’’ version 1, Feb. 12, 2014, available at https://www.nist.gov/ cyberframework/upload/cybersecurityframework-021214-final.pdf. Dated: September 17, 2014. Leslie Kux, Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2014–22515 Filed 9–22–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164–01–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Sep 22, 2014 Jkt 232001 Report on the Standardization of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies; Availability AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice; request for comments. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the availability of a draft report entitled ‘‘Standardizing and Evaluating Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS)’’. This report describes the Agency’s findings concerning strategies to standardize risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS), where appropriate, with the goal of reducing the burden of implementing REMS on practitioners, patients, and others in various health care settings. As part of the reauthorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), FDA has committed to standardizing REMS to better integrate them into the existing and evolving health care system. FDA is publishing this report to allow the public to provide comment on the report as it relates to PDUFA. DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments by November 24, 2014. SUMMARY: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft report to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft report. Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Currey, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6125, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301– 796–3918, FAX: 301–595–7910, email: REMS_Standardization@fda.hhs.gov; or Adam Kroetsch, Center for Drug ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 1192, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002; 301– 796–3842, FAX: 301–847–8443, email: REMS_Standardization@fda.hhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background FDA is announcing the availability of a draft report entitled ‘‘Standardizing and Evaluating Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS).’’ This report describes the Agency’s findings concerning strategies to standardize REMS, where appropriate, with the goal of reducing the burden on practitioners, patients, and others in various health care settings. The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110–85), enacted on September 27, 2007, established FDA’s authority to require REMS for prescription drug and biological products when it determines that such a strategy is necessary to ensure that the benefits of a drug outweigh the risks. Since that time, REMS have become a key tool in augmenting FDA’s drug safety capacities. The Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) (Pub. L. 112–144), enacted on July 9, 2012, amended FDA’s REMS authorities and strengthened the Agency’s ability to safeguard and advance public health. Among other things, FDASIA reauthorized the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (known as ‘‘PDUFA V,’’ reflecting the fifth reauthorization of PDUFA). As part of its PDUFA V commitments, FDA agreed, among other things, to ‘‘measure the effectiveness of REMS and standardize and better integrate REMS into the health care system.’’ To this end, ‘‘FDA will . . . continue to develop techniques to standardize REMS and with stakeholder input seek to integrate them into the existing and evolving (e.g., increasingly electronic) health care system.’’ FDA also agreed to hold one or more public meetings to explore strategies to standardize REMS, where appropriate, with the goal of reducing the burden of implementing REMS on practitioners, patients, and others in various health care settings, and to issue a report of the Agency’s findings identifying at least one priority project with a work plan for project completion in the areas of pharmacy systems, prescriber education, providing benefitrisk information to patients, and practice settings. FDA held a 2-day public meeting on REMS Standardization and Assessment on July 25–26, 2013, on approaches to standardizing REMS and better E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM 23SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Notices integrating them into the health care delivery system. A transcript of the public meeting and a background document, as well as FDA presentations made at the meeting, are available on FDA’s Web site at https://www.fda.gov/ forindustry/userfees/ prescriptiondruguserfee/ ucm351029.htm. This report summarizes stakeholder engagement achieved in fiscal year (FY) 2013, including suggestions and recommendations received from meetings, an expert panel workshop, and comments received electronically (posted to a Federal docket) and via teleconferences. Stakeholder feedback guided the Agency in selecting four priority projects within the areas specified by PDUFA V: (1) Providing benefit/risk information to patients, (2) prescriber education, (3) pharmacy systems, and (4) practice settings. This report briefly reviews the background and context for REMS as well as FDA initiatives for REMS administration and program improvement, summarizes key feedback from stakeholders and experts, and presents the design and the proposed workplans of projects in the four designated priority areas. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES II. Draft Report Describing Findings Concerning REMS Standardization and Plans for Projects To Standardize REMS A. Stakeholder Recommendations Stakeholder input and recommendations received by FDA in 2013 emphasize the need for better communication by FDA about REMS, improved leveraging of information technology, and flexibility to tailor REMS programs to specific health care settings. The four priority projects that are discussed in detail at the end of the report flow, in part, from these recommendations, and represent the Agency’s next steps toward an improved and integrated REMS strategy. FDA found that stakeholders in various settings have successfully implemented REMS requirements, in some cases developing systems to manage REMS requirements specific to their institutions and integrate the REMS into their practices. However, FDA also heard that REMS programs affect specific stakeholder responsibilities and organizational structures differently, presenting a central challenge to standardizing REMS while meeting the needs of multiple stakeholders across an array of health care environments. Stakeholders indicated that they want flexibility to implement a REMS program based upon the nature of the health care setting. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Sep 22, 2014 Jkt 232001 Stakeholders emphasized that communication by FDA about REMS should be improved. They stated that FDA communications about REMS are often inadequate, inconsistent, unclear, or too difficult to access, navigate, and digest. Stakeholders recommended that FDA create more comprehensive, evidencebased, and organized communications that can function within existing health care systems; deliver clear, actionable information to clinicians; and help to ensure that patients receive the drugs they require with excellent safety monitoring and oversight. They frequently suggested that FDA invest in and improve leveraging of existing information technology systems to better integrate REMS into standard medical practice and ongoing health care delivery. Several stakeholders noted that current REMS documentation is not standardized and generally cannot be easily searched, queried, or managed. They recommended Structured Product Labeling (SPL) as a possible designated standard that may allow for a centralized, standardized REMS information repository. Several stakeholders expressed interest in human factors evaluation methods like Failure Modes and Effect Analysis (FMEA) or a ‘‘Health Care FMEA’’ that might be deployed to help to develop criteria for levels of risk (e.g., illness, injury, death) that could prompt regulatory action. Stakeholders suggested that REMS assessments might benefit from leveraging of data sources (e.g., electronic health records, claims data) to conduct assessments. A related recommendation was that FDA assess programs earlier and more frequently throughout a product’s life cycle, and apply information gleaned from assessments to modify REMS if needed. B. Priority Projects Guided by stakeholder feedback and recommendations, FDA has identified four priority projects, one for each topic area described previously. Each project responds to input the Agency has received regarding significant areas of opportunity for REMS standardization and evaluation efforts. • Project 1: Providing Benefit-Risk Information to Patients This project aims to improve the tools used for prescriber-to-patient counseling about REMS drugs. To that end, FDA proposes to conduct research into existing REMS patient counseling tools, other patient counseling initiatives, and counseling literature to identify current PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 56817 tactics and strategies for patient counseling about medication benefits and risk. The Agency intends to seek feedback from a range of stakeholders to identify opportunities to improve the content, format, processes, techniques, and delivery of effective counseling within REMS programs. In addition, FDA intends to develop a public report of findings and counseling processes and tools that could serve as the basis for designing new tools and validating them in demonstration projects. • Project 2: Prescriber Education Numerous stakeholders asked FDA to facilitate the provision of health care provider continuing education (CE) for the education and training that is provided in a REMS program. This project will assess whether it is feasible to provide CE certified by the Accreditation Council of Continuing Medical Education, Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing, and Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education associated with a specific REMS. FDA will seek to determine at what stage in the drug approval process CE development would best fit (e.g., before or after product approval) and which CE model(s) would be best suited for this type of activity; and provide an analysis of the time and resource burden associated with developing such CE programs. • Project 3: Pharmacy Systems FDA proposes to identify an approach for incorporating REMS information into SPL. The project’s purpose is to develop a method to share clear and consistent information about the content of REMS, including REMS documents, requirements, and materials. Doing so will, among other things, facilitate integrating REMS into pharmacy systems and health information technology, including systems for electronic prescribing. SPL will also enable FDA to make structured REMS information available to health care providers and patients, and provide a single conduit of comprehensive information about REMS programs. • Project 4: Practice Settings The purpose of this project is to provide a centralized, standardized, reliable, and user-friendly repository of information about REMS, including stakeholders’ specific activities and requirements under each REMS program. FDA intends to develop its REMS Web page as a central source of REMS information, which will provide stakeholders in a range of practice settings with a reliable and accessible resource to help them quickly learn E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM 23SEN1 56818 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 2014 / Notices about REMS programs, understand and comply with REMS requirements, and compare requirements across REMS to minimize confusion associated with complying with multiple REMS programs. C. Scope of the Report This report describes the Agency’s findings concerning strategies to standardize REMS where appropriate, with the goal of reducing the burden of implementing REMS on practitioners, patients, and others in various health care settings. This report contains project plans to: (1) Increase access to REMS-related information through the use of SPL, (2) enhance the Agency’s REMS Web page to better meet the needs of stakeholders, (3) assess the feasibility of using accredited CE courses for prescriber training, and (4) enhance existing tools for prescribers to communicate with patients regarding risks of drugs with REMS, and how those risks should be weighed against the potential benefits of the drug. III. Electronic Access Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document on FDA’s Web site at https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/ UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/ ucm350852.htm or https:// www.regulations.gov. IV. Comments Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding this document to https://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at https:// www.regulations.gov. After consideration of comments, FDA will finalize the report and project plans. The Agency intends to post updates to the project plans on FDA’s Web site. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Dated: September 17, 2014. Leslie Kux, Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2014–22513 Filed 9–22–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164–01–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Sep 22, 2014 Jkt 232001 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Submission for OMB Review; 30-Day Comment Request: State and Community Tobacco Control Research Initiative Evaluation (NCI) Under the provisions of Section 3507(a)(1)(D) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for review and approval of the information collection listed below. This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register on June 6, 2014 (79 FR 32742) and allowed 60 days for public comment. One public comment was received. The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comment. The National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, may not conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is not required to respond to, an information collection that has been extended, revised, or implemented on or after October 1, 1995, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Direct Comments to OMB: Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the item(s) contained in this notice, especially regarding the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to the: Office of Management and Budget, Office of Regulatory Affairs, OIRA_submission@ omb.eop.gov or by fax to 202–395–6974, Attention: NIH Desk Officer. Comment Due Date: Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of having their full effect if received within 30 days of the date of this publication. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To obtain a copy of the data collection plans and instruments or request more information on the proposed project contact: Elizabeth M. Ginexi, Ph.D., Tobacco Control Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 3E564 MSC 9761, Bethesda, Maryland 20892– 9761 or call non-toll-free number 240– 276–6765 or email your request, including your address to: LGinexi@ mail.nih.gov. Formal requests for SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 additional plans and instruments must be requested in writing. Proposed Collection: State and Community Tobacco Control Research Initiative Evaluation (SCTC), 0925– NEW, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Need and Use of Information Collection: The National Cancer Institute State and Community Tobacco Control Research Initiative is a program within the Tobacco Control Research Branch in the Behavioral Research Program of the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences. The program targets 4 high-priority tobacco control research areas at the state and community level in the United States: (1) Secondhand smoke policies, (2) Tobacco tax and pricing policies, (3) Mass media countermeasures and community and social norms, and (4) Tobacco industry practices. The initiative supports innovative research to yield rapid and actionable findings for state and community tobacco control programs. The purpose of the evaluation is to assess the dissemination, implementation, and community collaboration processes of the grantees and their respective state and community partners and stakeholders. The evaluation will utilize archival grant project data and archival data collected from the scientists in the first two years of the initiative. The evaluation also will collect new data to: (1) Determine relationships, interactions, and connectedness among different network partnerships over time and with policy makers; (2) assess the utility of research tools, interventions, products, and findings from the perspective of key tobacco control stakeholders; and (3) determine key indicators for broad adoption of research products. Results will address research-to-practice gaps by providing a critical window into the process of disseminating evidence-based research tools, products, and science findings in community public health settings. Intended audiences include staff at NIH Institutes and Centers interested in supporting translation/dissemination and implementation science. OMB approval is requested for one year. There are no costs to respondents other than their time. The total estimated annualized burden hours are 112. E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM 23SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56816-56818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22513]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0502]


Report on the Standardization of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation 
Strategies; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
availability of a draft report entitled ``Standardizing and Evaluating 
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS)''. This report 
describes the Agency's findings concerning strategies to standardize 
risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS), where appropriate, 
with the goal of reducing the burden of implementing REMS on 
practitioners, patients, and others in various health care settings. As 
part of the reauthorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act 
(PDUFA), FDA has committed to standardizing REMS to better integrate 
them into the existing and evolving health care system. FDA is 
publishing this report to allow the public to provide comment on the 
report as it relates to PDUFA.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments by November 24, 
2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft 
report to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation 
and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., 
Bldg. 51, Rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one self-
addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your 
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic 
access to the draft report.
    Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit 
written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food 
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 
20852. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in 
the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Currey, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6125, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-3918, FAX: 301-595-7910, email: 
REMSStandardization@fda.hhs.gov; or Adam Kroetsch, Center for 
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 1192, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002; 301-
796-3842, FAX: 301-847-8443, email: 
REMSStandardization@fda.hhs.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft report entitled 
``Standardizing and Evaluating Risk Evaluation and Mitigation 
Strategies (REMS).'' This report describes the Agency's findings 
concerning strategies to standardize REMS, where appropriate, with the 
goal of reducing the burden on practitioners, patients, and others in 
various health care settings. The Food and Drug Administration 
Amendments Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-85), enacted on September 27, 2007, 
established FDA's authority to require REMS for prescription drug and 
biological products when it determines that such a strategy is 
necessary to ensure that the benefits of a drug outweigh the risks. 
Since that time, REMS have become a key tool in augmenting FDA's drug 
safety capacities. The Food and Drug Administration Safety and 
Innovation Act (FDASIA) (Pub. L. 112-144), enacted on July 9, 2012, 
amended FDA's REMS authorities and strengthened the Agency's ability to 
safeguard and advance public health. Among other things, FDASIA 
reauthorized the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (known as ``PDUFA V,'' 
reflecting the fifth reauthorization of PDUFA). As part of its PDUFA V 
commitments, FDA agreed, among other things, to ``measure the 
effectiveness of REMS and standardize and better integrate REMS into 
the health care system.'' To this end, ``FDA will . . . continue to 
develop techniques to standardize REMS and with stakeholder input seek 
to integrate them into the existing and evolving (e.g., increasingly 
electronic) health care system.'' FDA also agreed to hold one or more 
public meetings to explore strategies to standardize REMS, where 
appropriate, with the goal of reducing the burden of implementing REMS 
on practitioners, patients, and others in various health care settings, 
and to issue a report of the Agency's findings identifying at least one 
priority project with a work plan for project completion in the areas 
of pharmacy systems, prescriber education, providing benefit-risk 
information to patients, and practice settings.
    FDA held a 2-day public meeting on REMS Standardization and 
Assessment on July 25-26, 2013, on approaches to standardizing REMS and 
better

[[Page 56817]]

integrating them into the health care delivery system. A transcript of 
the public meeting and a background document, as well as FDA 
presentations made at the meeting, are available on FDA's Web site at 
https://www.fda.gov/forindustry/userfees/prescriptiondruguserfee/ucm351029.htm.
    This report summarizes stakeholder engagement achieved in fiscal 
year (FY) 2013, including suggestions and recommendations received from 
meetings, an expert panel workshop, and comments received 
electronically (posted to a Federal docket) and via teleconferences. 
Stakeholder feedback guided the Agency in selecting four priority 
projects within the areas specified by PDUFA V: (1) Providing benefit/
risk information to patients, (2) prescriber education, (3) pharmacy 
systems, and (4) practice settings. This report briefly reviews the 
background and context for REMS as well as FDA initiatives for REMS 
administration and program improvement, summarizes key feedback from 
stakeholders and experts, and presents the design and the proposed 
workplans of projects in the four designated priority areas.

II. Draft Report Describing Findings Concerning REMS Standardization 
and Plans for Projects To Standardize REMS

A. Stakeholder Recommendations

    Stakeholder input and recommendations received by FDA in 2013 
emphasize the need for better communication by FDA about REMS, improved 
leveraging of information technology, and flexibility to tailor REMS 
programs to specific health care settings. The four priority projects 
that are discussed in detail at the end of the report flow, in part, 
from these recommendations, and represent the Agency's next steps 
toward an improved and integrated REMS strategy.
    FDA found that stakeholders in various settings have successfully 
implemented REMS requirements, in some cases developing systems to 
manage REMS requirements specific to their institutions and integrate 
the REMS into their practices. However, FDA also heard that REMS 
programs affect specific stakeholder responsibilities and 
organizational structures differently, presenting a central challenge 
to standardizing REMS while meeting the needs of multiple stakeholders 
across an array of health care environments. Stakeholders indicated 
that they want flexibility to implement a REMS program based upon the 
nature of the health care setting.
    Stakeholders emphasized that communication by FDA about REMS should 
be improved. They stated that FDA communications about REMS are often 
inadequate, inconsistent, unclear, or too difficult to access, 
navigate, and digest.
    Stakeholders recommended that FDA create more comprehensive, 
evidence-based, and organized communications that can function within 
existing health care systems; deliver clear, actionable information to 
clinicians; and help to ensure that patients receive the drugs they 
require with excellent safety monitoring and oversight. They frequently 
suggested that FDA invest in and improve leveraging of existing 
information technology systems to better integrate REMS into standard 
medical practice and ongoing health care delivery.
    Several stakeholders noted that current REMS documentation is not 
standardized and generally cannot be easily searched, queried, or 
managed. They recommended Structured Product Labeling (SPL) as a 
possible designated standard that may allow for a centralized, 
standardized REMS information repository.
    Several stakeholders expressed interest in human factors evaluation 
methods like Failure Modes and Effect Analysis (FMEA) or a ``Health 
Care FMEA'' that might be deployed to help to develop criteria for 
levels of risk (e.g., illness, injury, death) that could prompt 
regulatory action.
    Stakeholders suggested that REMS assessments might benefit from 
leveraging of data sources (e.g., electronic health records, claims 
data) to conduct assessments. A related recommendation was that FDA 
assess programs earlier and more frequently throughout a product's life 
cycle, and apply information gleaned from assessments to modify REMS if 
needed.

B. Priority Projects

    Guided by stakeholder feedback and recommendations, FDA has 
identified four priority projects, one for each topic area described 
previously. Each project responds to input the Agency has received 
regarding significant areas of opportunity for REMS standardization and 
evaluation efforts.
 Project 1: Providing Benefit-Risk Information to Patients
    This project aims to improve the tools used for prescriber-to-
patient counseling about REMS drugs. To that end, FDA proposes to 
conduct research into existing REMS patient counseling tools, other 
patient counseling initiatives, and counseling literature to identify 
current tactics and strategies for patient counseling about medication 
benefits and risk. The Agency intends to seek feedback from a range of 
stakeholders to identify opportunities to improve the content, format, 
processes, techniques, and delivery of effective counseling within REMS 
programs. In addition, FDA intends to develop a public report of 
findings and counseling processes and tools that could serve as the 
basis for designing new tools and validating them in demonstration 
projects.
 Project 2: Prescriber Education
    Numerous stakeholders asked FDA to facilitate the provision of 
health care provider continuing education (CE) for the education and 
training that is provided in a REMS program. This project will assess 
whether it is feasible to provide CE certified by the Accreditation 
Council of Continuing Medical Education, Accreditation Commission for 
Education in Nursing, and Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education 
associated with a specific REMS. FDA will seek to determine at what 
stage in the drug approval process CE development would best fit (e.g., 
before or after product approval) and which CE model(s) would be best 
suited for this type of activity; and provide an analysis of the time 
and resource burden associated with developing such CE programs.
 Project 3: Pharmacy Systems
    FDA proposes to identify an approach for incorporating REMS 
information into SPL. The project's purpose is to develop a method to 
share clear and consistent information about the content of REMS, 
including REMS documents, requirements, and materials. Doing so will, 
among other things, facilitate integrating REMS into pharmacy systems 
and health information technology, including systems for electronic 
prescribing. SPL will also enable FDA to make structured REMS 
information available to health care providers and patients, and 
provide a single conduit of comprehensive information about REMS 
programs.
 Project 4: Practice Settings
    The purpose of this project is to provide a centralized, 
standardized, reliable, and user-friendly repository of information 
about REMS, including stakeholders' specific activities and 
requirements under each REMS program. FDA intends to develop its REMS 
Web page as a central source of REMS information, which will provide 
stakeholders in a range of practice settings with a reliable and 
accessible resource to help them quickly learn

[[Page 56818]]

about REMS programs, understand and comply with REMS requirements, and 
compare requirements across REMS to minimize confusion associated with 
complying with multiple REMS programs.

C. Scope of the Report

    This report describes the Agency's findings concerning strategies 
to standardize REMS where appropriate, with the goal of reducing the 
burden of implementing REMS on practitioners, patients, and others in 
various health care settings. This report contains project plans to: 
(1) Increase access to REMS-related information through the use of SPL, 
(2) enhance the Agency's REMS Web page to better meet the needs of 
stakeholders, (3) assess the feasibility of using accredited CE courses 
for prescriber training, and (4) enhance existing tools for prescribers 
to communicate with patients regarding risks of drugs with REMS, and 
how those risks should be weighed against the potential benefits of the 
drug.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document on 
FDA's Web site at https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/ucm350852.htm or https://www.regulations.gov.

IV. Comments

    Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding 
this document to https://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the 
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to 
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number 
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments 
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at https://www.regulations.gov. After consideration of comments, FDA will 
finalize the report and project plans. The Agency intends to post 
updates to the project plans on FDA's Web site.

    Dated: September 17, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-22513 Filed 9-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.