Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit or Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries for Fiscal Year 2015, 56625-56629 [2014-22675]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 183 / Monday, September 22, 2014 / Presidential Documents
56625
Presidential Documents
Presidential Determination No. 2014–15 of September 15, 2014
Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit or Major
Illicit Drug Producing Countries for Fiscal Year 2015
Memorandum for the Secretary of State
Pursuant to section 706(1) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal
Year 2003 (Public Law 107–228) (FRAA), I hereby identify the following
countries as major drug transit and/or major illicit drug producing countries:
Afghanistan, The Bahamas, Belize, Bolivia, Burma, Colombia, Costa Rica,
Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras,
India, Jamaica, Laos, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, and Venezuela.
A country’s presence on the foregoing list is not a reflection of its government’s counternarcotics efforts or level of cooperation with the United States.
Consistent with the statutory definition of a major drug transit or drug
producing country set forth in section 481(e)(2) and (5) of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (FAA), the reason major drug transit
or illicit drug producing countries are placed on the list is the combination
of geographic, commercial, and economic factors that allow drugs to transit
or be produced, even if a government has carried out the most assiduous
narcotics control law enforcement measures.
Pursuant to section 706(2)(A) of the FRAA, I hereby designate Bolivia, Burma,
and Venezuela as countries that have failed demonstrably during the previous
12 months to adhere to their obligations under international counternarcotics
agreements and take the measures set forth in section 489(a)(1) of the FAA.
Included in this report are justifications for the determinations on Bolivia,
Burma, and Venezuela, as required by section 706(2)(B) of the FRAA. Explanations for these decisions are published with this determination.
I have also determined, in accordance with provisions of section 706(3)(A)
of the FRAA, that support for programs to aid Burma and Venezuela are
vital to the national interests of the United States.
International Framework for Narcotics and Crime Control
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
This determination highlights significant U.S. domestic drug control issues
and foreign assistance approaches to drug control. It also examines policies
and programs shared by most countries to counter the destabilizing effects
of illegal drugs and transnational organized crime. The combined aim of
these undertakings is to foster sustainable citizen security to advance social
welfare, safety, and economic prosperity of vulnerable communities around
the world.
International cooperation remains the cornerstone for reducing the threat
posed by the illegal narcotics trade and related crimes carried out by criminal
organizations. The sophisticated and effective operations of organizations
challenge law enforcement officials and policymakers everywhere. The essential underpinnings of our unified stance against criminal enterprise are embodied in longstanding international agreements, including the 1961, 1971,
and 1988 U.N. Conventions; the U.N. Convention against Transnational Organized Crime; and the U.N. Convention against Corruption. A myriad of
regional and sub-regional joint undertakings, such as the 2010 Drug Strategy
for the Hemisphere, adopted by the 34 members of the Organization of
American States, mirror the wide-ranging standards of the U.N. conventions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:29 Sep 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4790
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\22SEO1.SGM
22SEO1
56626
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 183 / Monday, September 22, 2014 / Presidential Documents
The frameworks established by the U.N. conventions are as applicable to
the contemporary world as when they were negotiated and signed by the
vast majority of U.N. member states.
The United States shares the view of most countries that the U.N. drug
conventions—without negotiation or amendment—are resilient enough to
unify countries that often hold divergent views of the causes of the international narcotics problem, while at the same time providing a framework
upon which to build the best solutions to it. The U.N. drug conventions,
which recognize that the suppression of international drug trafficking demands urgent attention and the highest priority, allow sovereign nations
the flexibility to develop and adapt new policies and programs in keeping
with their own national circumstances while retaining their focus on achieving the conventions’ aim of ensuring the availability of controlled substances
for medical and scientific purposes, preventing abuse and addiction, and
suppressing drug trafficking and related criminal activities. The United States
supports the view of most countries that revising the U.N. drug conventions
is not a prerequisite to advancing the common and shared responsibility
of international cooperation designed to enhance the positive goals we have
set to counter illegal drugs and crime.
The Challenge of Opium Poppy Production and Heroin
The 2014 U.N. World Drug Report states that illegal poppy cultivation and
production of heroin and opium and other derivatives are at the top of
the list of global drug problems.
According to the Office of National Drug Control Policy, the latest United
States Government estimates show for the third consecutive year, in Afghanistan, which has the world’s largest opium poppy cultivation, cultivation
increased from 180,000 hectares in 2012 to 198,000 hectares in 2013. The
opium poppy trade in Afghanistan threatens domestic institutions, subverts
the legal economy, and undermines good governance and the capacity of
the Afghan people. Although less pronounced, opium poppy cultivation
also increased considerably in Burma and Laos; this situation presents similar
threats in these countries as those faced by Afghanistan.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
In spite of Afghanistan’s crop reduction setbacks, which include a reduction
in eradication from 9,672 hectares in 2012 to 7,348 hectares in 2013, U.S.
assistance has advanced the country’s counternarcotics capacity in some
areas. In particular, there have been positive developments in Afghan programs such as interdiction, prosecutions, treatment services, and alternative
livelihoods for farmers. All of this has happened in the context of a difficult
security situation and entrenched corruption. Still, opium poppy is grown
in less than 3 percent of farmable land; nearly 10 times more is devoted
to wheat production.
United States support for Afghanistan after 2014 will focus on maintaining
established infrastructure and improving security. The United States is also
working to secure more bilateral and multilateral assistance from the international community beyond programs that are already in place. This includes
support from Canadian and European partners. At the same time, it is
in the best interest of countries in the region with high levels of opiumproduct abuse to support Afghanistan’s counternarcotics efforts. This includes
Afghanistan’s immediate neighbors, Iran, Pakistan, and Russia, as well as
other nations such as India and China. There is also an increase in transshipments of Afghanistan heroin going to Canada, a development of concern
that is being addressed by Canada with support from the United States.
In the past several years, U.S. officials have noted an alarming surge in
the use of heroin and are taking many steps to confront this growing domestic
problem. Survey results released in 2012 reported that nearly 700,000 American citizens used heroin, as compared to 373,000 in 2007. In the United
States, between 2006 and 2010, heroin deaths increased by 45 percent.
Today, experts understand that people from various walks of life are abusing
opium products. Significant increases have been noted in major U.S. cities,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:29 Sep 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4790
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\22SEO1.SGM
22SEO1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 183 / Monday, September 22, 2014 / Presidential Documents
56627
including Atlanta, Denver, Chicago, San Diego, and Seattle. In the United
States, between 2006 and 2011, heroin-involved deaths increased by 110
percent.
The United States is particularly concerned about poppy cultivation in Mexico, the primary supplier of illegal opium derivatives to the United States.
According to the Heroin Signature Program carried out by the U.S. Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA), opium poppy products also arrive in
the United States from Colombia and Guatemala, although to a lesser extent
from these countries than from Mexico. DEA reported a 324 percent increase
in heroin seizures at the Mexican border between 2009 and 2013.
The United States is increasing its heroin drug interdiction efforts as one
element of a set of measures for confronting the growing problem. Since
2011, more than 4,500 heroin related investigations were opened in the
country. Overseas, $110 million in U.S. funds have been provided to Mexican
border agencies for inspection equipment and training. Concrete success
resulting from this support includes seizure of illegal drugs and currency
by Mexican authorities valued at nearly $4 million. Similarly, U.S. foreign
assistance helped Colombia seize 379 kilograms of heroin in 2013, and
Guatemala eradicated a considerable amount of poppy cultivation in the
same year. Working with concerned counterparts, the United States will
adjust policy approaches and build upon existing programs, including the
Mexico Merida Initiative, to counter criminal elements that are creating
heroin markets in the United States and reaping growing illegal profits.
Cocaine Production and Use
The 2014 U.N. World Drug Report reaffirms that Colombia, Bolivia, and
Peru continue to cultivate virtually the world’s entire supply of coca for
cocaine and related products. The good news is that illegal coca crop production, now approximately 133,700 hectares in the three countries, is at the
lowest level since authorities began to establish estimates in 1990. Moreover,
global seizures have slightly increased, according to the U.N. Office on
Drugs and Crime (UNODC).
The United States is the world’s largest consumer of illegal cocaine, followed
by Brazil and certain countries in Europe. Although the DEA reports that
cocaine availability declined steadily in the United States from 2007 to
2012, the number of cocaine users has remained steady in recent years,
according to U.S. surveys.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
United States law enforcement agencies estimate that about 84 percent of
the cocaine entering the United States passes through Central America and
Mexico to reach destinations in the United States. Based on a decline in
maritime interdiction assets and diminished intelligence, there has been
a reduction in the awareness of cocaine transshipments. While recent assessments indicate an increase in cocaine flow in the maritime transit zone,
there are conflicting indicators on total cocaine flow and continued success
in combating drug trafficking organizations will require closing awareness
gaps.
Various types of U.S. assistance, including numerous programs aimed at
supporting national efforts to interdict drugs and target major traffickers,
are carried out through the Central American Regional Security Initiative.
Similar programs are supported by the United States through the Caribbean
Basin Security Initiative. These programs support national efforts to increase
law enforcement capability to confront organized crime and gangs, build
judicial sector capacity, and advance economic and social programs for
at-risk youth and communities disproportionately affected by illegal drugs
and crime.
New Psychoactive Substances (NPS)
Confronting illegal production and consumption of methamphetamine in
the United States, with much of the product originating in Mexico, has
been compounded by the growing problem of NPS—also described as synthetic designer drugs. This is a dynamic industry that uses chemicals and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:29 Sep 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4790
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\22SEO1.SGM
22SEO1
56628
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 183 / Monday, September 22, 2014 / Presidential Documents
other substances that are frequently not controlled. According to the 2014
U.N. World Drug Report, the number of NPS more than doubled over the
period 2009–2013. The number of such substances reported to UNODC,
almost 500, far exceeds the psychoactive substances already controlled by
the U.N. conventions.
In the United States, the DEA secured emergency scheduling of certain
substances and statutory changes (The Synthetic Drugs Abuse Prevention
Act of 2012), banning many of these substances, but U.S. law enforcement
agencies report that substance variations to make NPS are continually appearing, posing a serious threat to public health and unprecedented challenges
to drug awareness and treatment programs.
In 2013, the European Commission announced it would strengthen the European Union’s ability to respond to NPS by withdrawing products used
to make them from the market. This action followed a report by the European
Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction stating that the scale of
NPS use is growing dramatically on the continent. In its most recent reports,
UNODC highlights the NPS problem in particular. In one significant initiative,
UNODC is working to create a network to exchange information on NPS
use and related trends. With U.S. assistance, another UNODC program seeks
to identify the connections between pre-cursor chemicals and NPS. Much
of this action has been proposed in resolutions by the Commission on
Narcotic Drugs to promote international cooperation in responding to the
challenged posed by NPS.
Drug Awareness and Demand Reduction
The international community recognizes that drug use is as much a public
health problem as it is a public safety issue. The U.S. National Drug Control
Strategy stresses that prevention and treatment must be adapted to the
latest scientific knowledge and social services to help individuals overcome
their addictions. This approach has been adopted in other countries following
the call to member states by the International Narcotics Control Board to
integrate abuse prevention into public health, health promotion, and child
and youth prevention programs. More than 2,600 specialty courts in the
United States have connected over 120,000 people convicted of drug-related
offenses with the community services they need to avoid future drug use.
Similar initiatives around the world, many supported by the United States,
provide a variety of alternatives to incarceration programs for nonviolent
offenders. These programs are integral to scientifically based drug control
policies.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
Looking to the Future
Historically, U.S. foreign assistance programs have focused primarily on
fighting drug production and have supported related law enforcement programs. This approach is still integral to U.S. policy, but efforts today take
an increasingly holistic approach. Beginning with the current decade, efforts
aimed at preventative measures in U.S. assistance programs are designed
to enhance overall citizen security by challenging both transnational and
local security threats. These efforts involve U.S. partnerships including the
public and private sectors to achieve our common security goals and create
safe communities. This is carried out through law enforcement training,
judicial and human rights training, and alternative development, emphasizing
that such efforts must be designed to create and maintain safe environments.
In many nations, especially in Central and South America, countries are
actively seeking to strengthen their inter- and intra-regional cooperation
and exchange of information about best practices for counternarcotics and
crime control law enforcement activities relative to broad citizen security.
Taken as a whole, they are intended to promote respect for the rule of
law and human rights and to empower citizens to foster law-abiding communities consistent with long-term sustainability.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:29 Sep 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4790
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\22SEO1.SGM
22SEO1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 183 / Monday, September 22, 2014 / Presidential Documents
56629
You are hereby authorized and directed to submit this determination, with
the enclosed memoranda of justification regarding Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela, under section 706 of the FRAA, to the Congress, and publish it
in the Federal Register.
THE WHITE HOUSE,
Washington, September 15, 2014
[FR Doc. 2014–22675
Filed 9–19–14; 11:15 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:29 Sep 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4790
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\22SEO1.SGM
22SEO1
OB#1.EPS
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
Billing code 4710–10
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 183 (Monday, September 22, 2014)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 56625-56629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22675]
Presidential Documents
Federal Register / Vol. 79 , No. 183 / Monday, September 22, 2014 /
Presidential Documents
[[Page 56625]]
Presidential Determination No. 2014-15 of September 15,
2014
Presidential Determination on Major Drug Transit
or Major Illicit Drug Producing Countries for Fiscal
Year 2015
Memorandum for the Secretary of State
Pursuant to section 706(1) of the Foreign Relations
Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-
228) (FRAA), I hereby identify the following countries
as major drug transit and/or major illicit drug
producing countries: Afghanistan, The Bahamas, Belize,
Bolivia, Burma, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican
Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti,
Honduras, India, Jamaica, Laos, Mexico, Nicaragua,
Pakistan, Panama, Peru, and Venezuela.
A country's presence on the foregoing list is not a
reflection of its government's counternarcotics efforts
or level of cooperation with the United States.
Consistent with the statutory definition of a major
drug transit or drug producing country set forth in
section 481(e)(2) and (5) of the Foreign Assistance Act
of 1961, as amended (FAA), the reason major drug
transit or illicit drug producing countries are placed
on the list is the combination of geographic,
commercial, and economic factors that allow drugs to
transit or be produced, even if a government has
carried out the most assiduous narcotics control law
enforcement measures.
Pursuant to section 706(2)(A) of the FRAA, I hereby
designate Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela as countries
that have failed demonstrably during the previous 12
months to adhere to their obligations under
international counternarcotics agreements and take the
measures set forth in section 489(a)(1) of the FAA.
Included in this report are justifications for the
determinations on Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela, as
required by section 706(2)(B) of the FRAA. Explanations
for these decisions are published with this
determination.
I have also determined, in accordance with provisions
of section 706(3)(A) of the FRAA, that support for
programs to aid Burma and Venezuela are vital to the
national interests of the United States.
International Framework for Narcotics and Crime Control
This determination highlights significant U.S. domestic
drug control issues and foreign assistance approaches
to drug control. It also examines policies and programs
shared by most countries to counter the destabilizing
effects of illegal drugs and transnational organized
crime. The combined aim of these undertakings is to
foster sustainable citizen security to advance social
welfare, safety, and economic prosperity of vulnerable
communities around the world.
International cooperation remains the cornerstone for
reducing the threat posed by the illegal narcotics
trade and related crimes carried out by criminal
organizations. The sophisticated and effective
operations of organizations challenge law enforcement
officials and policymakers everywhere. The essential
underpinnings of our unified stance against criminal
enterprise are embodied in longstanding international
agreements, including the 1961, 1971, and 1988 U.N.
Conventions; the U.N. Convention against Transnational
Organized Crime; and the U.N. Convention against
Corruption. A myriad of regional and sub-regional joint
undertakings, such as the 2010 Drug Strategy for the
Hemisphere, adopted by the 34 members of the
Organization of American States, mirror the wide-
ranging standards of the U.N. conventions.
[[Page 56626]]
The frameworks established by the U.N. conventions are
as applicable to the contemporary world as when they
were negotiated and signed by the vast majority of U.N.
member states.
The United States shares the view of most countries
that the U.N. drug conventions--without negotiation or
amendment--are resilient enough to unify countries that
often hold divergent views of the causes of the
international narcotics problem, while at the same time
providing a framework upon which to build the best
solutions to it. The U.N. drug conventions, which
recognize that the suppression of international drug
trafficking demands urgent attention and the highest
priority, allow sovereign nations the flexibility to
develop and adapt new policies and programs in keeping
with their own national circumstances while retaining
their focus on achieving the conventions' aim of
ensuring the availability of controlled substances for
medical and scientific purposes, preventing abuse and
addiction, and suppressing drug trafficking and related
criminal activities. The United States supports the
view of most countries that revising the U.N. drug
conventions is not a prerequisite to advancing the
common and shared responsibility of international
cooperation designed to enhance the positive goals we
have set to counter illegal drugs and crime.
The Challenge of Opium Poppy Production and Heroin
The 2014 U.N. World Drug Report states that illegal
poppy cultivation and production of heroin and opium
and other derivatives are at the top of the list of
global drug problems.
According to the Office of National Drug Control
Policy, the latest United States Government estimates
show for the third consecutive year, in Afghanistan,
which has the world's largest opium poppy cultivation,
cultivation increased from 180,000 hectares in 2012 to
198,000 hectares in 2013. The opium poppy trade in
Afghanistan threatens domestic institutions, subverts
the legal economy, and undermines good governance and
the capacity of the Afghan people. Although less
pronounced, opium poppy cultivation also increased
considerably in Burma and Laos; this situation presents
similar threats in these countries as those faced by
Afghanistan.
In spite of Afghanistan's crop reduction setbacks,
which include a reduction in eradication from 9,672
hectares in 2012 to 7,348 hectares in 2013, U.S.
assistance has advanced the country's counternarcotics
capacity in some areas. In particular, there have been
positive developments in Afghan programs such as
interdiction, prosecutions, treatment services, and
alternative livelihoods for farmers. All of this has
happened in the context of a difficult security
situation and entrenched corruption. Still, opium poppy
is grown in less than 3 percent of farmable land;
nearly 10 times more is devoted to wheat production.
United States support for Afghanistan after 2014 will
focus on maintaining established infrastructure and
improving security. The United States is also working
to secure more bilateral and multilateral assistance
from the international community beyond programs that
are already in place. This includes support from
Canadian and European partners. At the same time, it is
in the best interest of countries in the region with
high levels of opium-product abuse to support
Afghanistan's counternarcotics efforts. This includes
Afghanistan's immediate neighbors, Iran, Pakistan, and
Russia, as well as other nations such as India and
China. There is also an increase in transshipments of
Afghanistan heroin going to Canada, a development of
concern that is being addressed by Canada with support
from the United States.
In the past several years, U.S. officials have noted an
alarming surge in the use of heroin and are taking many
steps to confront this growing domestic problem. Survey
results released in 2012 reported that nearly 700,000
American citizens used heroin, as compared to 373,000
in 2007. In the United States, between 2006 and 2010,
heroin deaths increased by 45 percent. Today, experts
understand that people from various walks of life are
abusing opium products. Significant increases have been
noted in major U.S. cities,
[[Page 56627]]
including Atlanta, Denver, Chicago, San Diego, and
Seattle. In the United States, between 2006 and 2011,
heroin-involved deaths increased by 110 percent.
The United States is particularly concerned about poppy
cultivation in Mexico, the primary supplier of illegal
opium derivatives to the United States. According to
the Heroin Signature Program carried out by the U.S.
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), opium poppy
products also arrive in the United States from Colombia
and Guatemala, although to a lesser extent from these
countries than from Mexico. DEA reported a 324 percent
increase in heroin seizures at the Mexican border
between 2009 and 2013.
The United States is increasing its heroin drug
interdiction efforts as one element of a set of
measures for confronting the growing problem. Since
2011, more than 4,500 heroin related investigations
were opened in the country. Overseas, $110 million in
U.S. funds have been provided to Mexican border
agencies for inspection equipment and training.
Concrete success resulting from this support includes
seizure of illegal drugs and currency by Mexican
authorities valued at nearly $4 million. Similarly,
U.S. foreign assistance helped Colombia seize 379
kilograms of heroin in 2013, and Guatemala eradicated a
considerable amount of poppy cultivation in the same
year. Working with concerned counterparts, the United
States will adjust policy approaches and build upon
existing programs, including the Mexico Merida
Initiative, to counter criminal elements that are
creating heroin markets in the United States and
reaping growing illegal profits.
Cocaine Production and Use
The 2014 U.N. World Drug Report reaffirms that
Colombia, Bolivia, and Peru continue to cultivate
virtually the world's entire supply of coca for cocaine
and related products. The good news is that illegal
coca crop production, now approximately 133,700
hectares in the three countries, is at the lowest level
since authorities began to establish estimates in 1990.
Moreover, global seizures have slightly increased,
according to the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime
(UNODC).
The United States is the world's largest consumer of
illegal cocaine, followed by Brazil and certain
countries in Europe. Although the DEA reports that
cocaine availability declined steadily in the United
States from 2007 to 2012, the number of cocaine users
has remained steady in recent years, according to U.S.
surveys.
United States law enforcement agencies estimate that
about 84 percent of the cocaine entering the United
States passes through Central America and Mexico to
reach destinations in the United States. Based on a
decline in maritime interdiction assets and diminished
intelligence, there has been a reduction in the
awareness of cocaine transshipments. While recent
assessments indicate an increase in cocaine flow in the
maritime transit zone, there are conflicting indicators
on total cocaine flow and continued success in
combating drug trafficking organizations will require
closing awareness gaps.
Various types of U.S. assistance, including numerous
programs aimed at supporting national efforts to
interdict drugs and target major traffickers, are
carried out through the Central American Regional
Security Initiative. Similar programs are supported by
the United States through the Caribbean Basin Security
Initiative. These programs support national efforts to
increase law enforcement capability to confront
organized crime and gangs, build judicial sector
capacity, and advance economic and social programs for
at-risk youth and communities disproportionately
affected by illegal drugs and crime.
New Psychoactive Substances (NPS)
Confronting illegal production and consumption of
methamphetamine in the United States, with much of the
product originating in Mexico, has been compounded by
the growing problem of NPS--also described as synthetic
designer drugs. This is a dynamic industry that uses
chemicals and
[[Page 56628]]
other substances that are frequently not controlled.
According to the 2014 U.N. World Drug Report, the
number of NPS more than doubled over the period 2009-
2013. The number of such substances reported to UNODC,
almost 500, far exceeds the psychoactive substances
already controlled by the U.N. conventions.
In the United States, the DEA secured emergency
scheduling of certain substances and statutory changes
(The Synthetic Drugs Abuse Prevention Act of 2012),
banning many of these substances, but U.S. law
enforcement agencies report that substance variations
to make NPS are continually appearing, posing a serious
threat to public health and unprecedented challenges to
drug awareness and treatment programs.
In 2013, the European Commission announced it would
strengthen the European Union's ability to respond to
NPS by withdrawing products used to make them from the
market. This action followed a report by the European
Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction stating
that the scale of NPS use is growing dramatically on
the continent. In its most recent reports, UNODC
highlights the NPS problem in particular. In one
significant initiative, UNODC is working to create a
network to exchange information on NPS use and related
trends. With U.S. assistance, another UNODC program
seeks to identify the connections between pre-cursor
chemicals and NPS. Much of this action has been
proposed in resolutions by the Commission on Narcotic
Drugs to promote international cooperation in
responding to the challenged posed by NPS.
Drug Awareness and Demand Reduction
The international community recognizes that drug use is
as much a public health problem as it is a public
safety issue. The U.S. National Drug Control Strategy
stresses that prevention and treatment must be adapted
to the latest scientific knowledge and social services
to help individuals overcome their addictions. This
approach has been adopted in other countries following
the call to member states by the International
Narcotics Control Board to integrate abuse prevention
into public health, health promotion, and child and
youth prevention programs. More than 2,600 specialty
courts in the United States have connected over 120,000
people convicted of drug-related offenses with the
community services they need to avoid future drug use.
Similar initiatives around the world, many supported by
the United States, provide a variety of alternatives to
incarceration programs for nonviolent offenders. These
programs are integral to scientifically based drug
control policies.
Looking to the Future
Historically, U.S. foreign assistance programs have
focused primarily on fighting drug production and have
supported related law enforcement programs. This
approach is still integral to U.S. policy, but efforts
today take an increasingly holistic approach. Beginning
with the current decade, efforts aimed at preventative
measures in U.S. assistance programs are designed to
enhance overall citizen security by challenging both
transnational and local security threats. These efforts
involve U.S. partnerships including the public and
private sectors to achieve our common security goals
and create safe communities. This is carried out
through law enforcement training, judicial and human
rights training, and alternative development,
emphasizing that such efforts must be designed to
create and maintain safe environments.
In many nations, especially in Central and South
America, countries are actively seeking to strengthen
their inter- and intra-regional cooperation and
exchange of information about best practices for
counternarcotics and crime control law enforcement
activities relative to broad citizen security. Taken as
a whole, they are intended to promote respect for the
rule of law and human rights and to empower citizens to
foster law-abiding communities consistent with long-
term sustainability.
[[Page 56629]]
You are hereby authorized and directed to submit this
determination, with the enclosed memoranda of
justification regarding Bolivia, Burma, and Venezuela,
under section 706 of the FRAA, to the Congress, and
publish it in the Federal Register.
(Presidential Sig.)
THE WHITE HOUSE,
Washington, September 15, 2014
[FR Doc. 2014-22675
Filed 9-19-14; 11:15 am]
Billing code 4710-10