Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request, 56368-56373 [2014-22357]
Download as PDF
56368
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 2014 / Notices
License No.: 024270N.
Name: NMC Logistics Solutions, Inc.
Address: 9910 NW 21st Street, Doral,
FL 33172.
Date Revoked: August 22, 2014.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and
Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2014–22385 Filed 9–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment
Request
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
SUMMARY: On June 15, 1984, the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
delegated to the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System (Board) its
approval authority under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.16, to approve of and assign OMB
control numbers to collection of
information requests and requirements
conducted or sponsored by the Board
under conditions set forth in 5 CFR
1320 Appendix A.1. Board-approved
collections of information are
incorporated into the official OMB
inventory of currently approved
collections of information. Copies of the
Paperwork Reduction Act Submission,
supporting statements and approved
collection of information instruments
are placed into OMB’s public docket
files. The Federal Reserve may not
conduct or sponsor, and the respondent
is not required to respond to, an
information collection that has been
extended, revised, or implemented on or
after October 1, 1995, unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before November 18, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by FR 3063a or b
(government-administered, general-use
prepaid cards); by any of the following
methods:
• Agency Web site: https://
www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments at
https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/
foia/proposedregs.aspx.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: regs.comments@
federalreserve.gov. Include OMB
number in the subject line of the
message.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Sep 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
• FAX: (202) 452–3819 or (202) 452–
3102.
• Mail: Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20551.
All public comments are available
from the Board’s Web site at https://
www.federalreserve.gov/apps/foia/
proposedregs.aspx as submitted, unless
modified for technical reasons.
Accordingly, your comments will not be
edited to remove any identifying or
contact information. Public comments
may also be viewed electronically or in
paper form in Room MP–500 of the
Board’s Martin Building (20th and C
Streets NW.) between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00
p.m. on weekdays.
Additionally, commenters may send a
copy of their comments to the OMB
Desk Officer—Shagufta Ahmed—Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Room 10235
725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC
20503 or by fax to (202) 395–6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A
copy of the PRA OMB submission,
including the proposed reporting form
and instructions, supporting statement,
and other documentation will be placed
into OMB’s public docket files, once
approved. These documents will also be
made available on the Federal Reserve
Board’s public Web site at: https://
www.federalreserve.gov/apps/
reportforms/review.aspx or may be
requested from the agency clearance
officer, whose name appears below.
Federal Reserve Board Acting
Clearance Officer—John Schmidt—
Office of the Chief Data Officer, Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, Washington, DC 20551 (202)
452–3829. Telecommunications Device
for the Deaf (TDD) users may contact
(202) 263–4869, Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System,
Washington, DC 20551.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comment on Information
Collection Proposals
The following information
collections, which are being handled
under this delegated authority, have
received initial Board approval and are
hereby published for comment. At the
end of the comment period, the
proposed information collections, along
with an analysis of comments and
recommendations received, will be
submitted to the Board for final
approval under OMB delegated
authority. Comments are invited on the
following:
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a. Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the Federal Reserve’s
functions; including whether the
information has practical utility;
b. The accuracy of the Federal
Reserve’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
c. Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
d. Ways to minimize the burden of
information collection on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and
e. Estimates of capital or start up costs
and costs of operation, maintenance,
and purchase of services to provide
information.
Proposal to approve under OMB
delegated authority the extension for
three years of the following information
collection, with revision:
Report title: Governmentadministered, General-use Prepaid Card
Surveys.1
Agency form number: FR 3063a and
FR 3063b.
OMB control number: 7100–0343.
Frequency: Annual.
Reporters: Issuers of governmentadministered, general-use prepaid cards
(FR 3063a) and governments that
administer general-use prepaid card
programs (FR 3063b).
Estimated annual reporting hours: FR
3063a: 375 hours; FR 3063b: 2,700
hours.
Estimated average hours per response:
FR 3063a: 25 hours; FR 3063b: 15 hours.
Number of respondents: FR 3063a: 15;
FR 3063b: 180.
General description of report: This
information collection is authorized by
subsection 920(a) of the Electronic Fund
Transfer Act (EFTA), which was
amended by section 1075(a) of the
Dodd-Frank Act. 15 U.S.C. § 1693o–2.
EFTA Section 920(a) requires the Board
to submit an annual report to the
Congress on the prevalence of the use of
general-use prepaid cards in Federal,
State, or local government-administered
payment programs and on the
interchange transaction fees and
cardholder fees charged with respect to
the use of such general-use prepaid
cards. 15 U.S.C. 1693o–2(a)(7)(D). EFTA
Section 920(a) also provides the Board
with authority to require issuers to
1 The issuer and government surveys, supporting
statement, and other documentation are available
on the Board’s public Web site at: https://
www.federalreserve.gov/apps/reportforms/
review.aspx.
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 2014 / Notices
provide information to enable the Board
to carry out the provisions of the
subsection. 15 U.S.C. 1693o–2(a)(3)(B).
The obligation of issuers to respond to
the issuer survey (FR 3063a) is
mandatory. However, the obligation of
state and local governments to respond
to the government survey (FR 3063b) is
voluntary. A limited amount of
information collected on the FR 3063a
issuer survey is publicly available, and
thus, is not accorded confidential
treatment. However, most of the
information collected on the FR 3063a
issuer survey is not publicly available
and may be kept confidential as
explained herein. Data collected by the
issuer survey may be kept confidential
under exemption (b)(4) of the Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA), which
exempts from disclosure ‘‘trade secrets
and commercial or financial information
obtained from a person and privileged
or confidential.’’ 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4).
Such data may be kept confidential
under exemption 4 if the release of data
would cause substantial harm to the
competitive position of the issuer. For
example, certain issuer survey
responses would likely contain
information related to an organization’s
revenue structure and other proprietary
and commercial information and the
release of such information would cause
substantial harm to the competitive
position of the issuer and could
therefore be kept confidential under
exemption 4. The information collected
on the government survey (FR 3063b) is
not accorded confidential treatment.
Abstract: Section 1075(a) of the DoddFrank Act provides that the Board shall
provide annually a report to the
Congress regarding the prevalence of the
use of general-use prepaid cards in
federal, state, and local governmentadministered payment programs, and
the interchange and cardholder fees
charged with respect to the use of such
prepaid cards.2 Section 1075(a) of the
Dodd-Frank Act also provides the Board
with authority to require card issuers to
respond to information requests as may
be necessary to carry out the provisions
of the section.
Current Actions: The Board proposes
to revise the issuer survey (FR 3063a) to
collect data on the number of
government programs broken out by
category of disbursement program; net
funds loaded onto prepaid cards broken
out by gross funds loaded and funds
voided or returned to government
offices, as well as by funds loaded
pursuant to government-administered
programs and funds loaded from other
sources; the average daily value of funds
2 15
U.S.C. 1693o–2(a)(7)(D).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Sep 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
outstanding; the value and volume of
ATM withdrawals broken out by
proprietary (in-network) ATMs and
nonproprietary (out-of-network) ATMs;
the amount reimbursed cardholders for
fees they incurred at nonproprietary
ATMs; the value/volume of over-thecounter at-bank (teller) withdrawals as
well as fees assessed to cardholders by
third party banks for these withdrawals;
the value of settled purchase
transactions and interchange fee
revenue broken out by transactions that
are exempt and not exempt from the
interchange fee standards of Regulation
II; and sources of revenue collected by
issuers other than interchange and
cardholder fees. The Board also
proposes to combine current sections II
and III as well as current sections XIII
and IX. In addition, the Board proposes
that issuers not be required to complete
a separate survey for each program.
Rather, issuers would be required to
complete one survey for federal
programs in aggregate and one survey
for state/local programs in aggregate.
The Board proposes to revise the
government survey (FR 3063b) to collect
data on the number of government
programs reported in the survey. In
addition, the Board proposes to requests
public comment on the potential effects
of repealing the FR 3063b survey.
Lastly, the Board proposes to make
several clarifications to both surveys
and to delete questions that are no
longer relevant from both surveys.
Issuer Survey (FR 3063a)
The issuer survey is required for
depository institutions that issue
general-use prepaid cards for federal,
state, or local government-administered
payment programs. The survey requests
information on cards associated with
accounts domiciled in the United States,
the District of Columbia, and U.S.
territories.
The current survey (last administered
in early 2014) collects information
separately for each governmentadministered payment program for
which the depository institution is the
issuer of general-use prepaid cards. The
current survey collects information on
card programs using two types of
authentication mechanisms: Dualmessage transactions and singlemessage transactions.3 The cards issued
3 In dual-message transactions, authorization
information is carried in one message and clearing
information is carried in a separate message
(typically, these transactions are authenticated with
a signature). In single-message transactions,
authorization and clearing information is carried in
one message (typically, these transactions are
authenticated with a PIN). General-use prepaid card
transactions may use either method (although dualmessage transactions are more common).
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56369
pursuant to government-administered
payment programs may be either
reloadable or non-reloadable.
The current issuer survey comprises
nine sections:
I. Government-Administered, GeneralUse Prepaid Card Program Information:
Respondents report summary
information on card programs covered
in the response including the name of
the program(s), whether the response
covers federal or state/local programs,
the geographic areas where cards have
been issued, the name of the sponsoring
government agency, the type of payment
program, and the number of recipients
receiving payments on prepaid cards.
II. Government-Administered
Payment Cards: Respondents report
summary information on the number of
cards outstanding and the allocation of
cards outstanding between cards that
can be used on both dual-message and
single-message networks, cards that can
be used exclusively on dual-message
networks, and cards that can be used on
exclusively single-message networks.
Respondents also report the number of
cards that can be used on two or more
unaffiliated networks.
III. Funding: Respondents report the
value of funds loaded into prepaid card
accounts and funds outstanding on
prepaid card accounts.
IV. ATM Transactions: Respondents
report summary information on the
number of cards outstanding at year-end
that can be used to make ATM cash
withdrawals, the volume and value of
ATM cash withdrawals, and the ATM
fees assessed to cardholders by ATM
operators of nonproprietary (out-ofnetwork) ATMs.
V. Purchase Transactions:
Respondents report summary
information on the volume and value of
settled purchase transactions and the
allocation of the volume and value of
settled purchase transactions between
single-message transactions and dualmessage transactions.
VI. Fees Paid by Issuers: Respondents
report the fees paid by issuers to third
parties for ATM cash withdrawals and
over-the-counter (OTC) at-bank (teller)
cash withdrawals.
VII. Issuer Revenue: Interchange Fees:
Respondents report interchange fee
revenue received on settled purchase
transactions and the allocation of
interchange fee revenue received on
dual-message transactions and singlemessage transactions.
VIII. Issuer Revenue: Cardholder Fees:
Respondents report total revenue
received on all fees assessed to
cardholders and the allocation revenue
received from cardholder fees between
purchase transaction fees, ATM fees,
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
56370
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 2014 / Notices
OTC fees, account servicing fees,
routine monthly fees, customer service
inquiry fees, penalty fees, overdraft fees,
and all other cardholder fees.
IX. Fees Assessed to Cardholders:
Respondents provide summary
information on fees assessed to
cardholders, including purchase
transaction fees, ATM fees, OTC fees,
account servicing fees, routine monthly
fees, customer service inquiry fees,
penalty fees, overdraft fees and all other
cardholder fees.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Revisions to Issuer Survey
(FR 3063a)
The Board proposes to modify the
survey reporting structure to reduce
burden on respondents. Currently, a
respondent is required to complete the
survey for each individual governmentadministered payment program for
which the respondent is the prepaid
card issuer. The Board has modified the
survey instrument so that issuers will be
required to complete the survey only
twice: Once for all federal programs (in
aggregate) and once for all state/local
programs (in aggregate). The Board
believes that the proposed structure will
reduce reporting burden without
significantly compromising the value of
the data collected. In addition, the
Board proposes to streamline the survey
by combining relevant questions in
current sections II and III and
combining relevant questions in current
sections XIII and IX. A section-bysection description of the changes is
provided below.
Section I: Program Information
(Renamed From ‘‘GovernmentAdministered, General-Use Prepaid
Card Program Information’’)
Questions 1 and 2 (revised survey):
Number of government-administered
payment program(s) covered in this
response. The Board proposes to add
question 1 (to the revised survey) to
obtain an accurate count of the
government-administered payment
programs on which issuers will report.
The Board also proposes to add question
2 (to the revised survey) which requests
a breakout of the number of programs
between program categories (such as
child support, payroll, and so on). This
breakout replaces question 5 (of the
current survey) which asks issuers to
indicate (via a check box) categories on
an individual program basis. Questions
1 and 2 (of the revised survey) support
the Board’s proposed revision to the
reporting structure which would allow
issuers to provide aggregate responses
for their programs.
Question 2 (current survey): Does this
response cover a federal or a state/local
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Sep 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
program(s)? The Board proposes to
delete question 2 (of the current survey).
Under the proposed revision to the
reporting structure, respondents would
complete the survey once for federal
programs and once for state/local
programs.
Question 3 (current survey):
Jurisdiction(s)—Geographic area in
which the government-administered,
general-use prepaid cards have been
issued.
The Board proposes to delete question
3 (of the current survey). The Board
believes that the information captured
in this question is no longer necessary
to support the Board’s annual report.
Question 3 (revised survey): Name of
program and sponsoring government
agency. The Board proposes to combine
question 1 (of the current survey) which
asks for the name of the governmentadministered payment program and
question 4 (of the current survey) which
requests the name of the sponsoring
government agency (the agency
administering a governmentadministered payment program). The
combined question 3 (of the proposed
survey) provides a grid of input boxes
so that a respondent can enter
information separately for each
government program included in a
response. This new format supports the
Board’s proposed revision to the
reporting structure which would allow
issuers to provide aggregate responses
for their programs.
Question 6 (current survey):
Recipients receiving payments on
government-administered, general-use
prepaid cards. The Board proposes to
delete question 6 (of the current survey).
A cardholder may receive payments on
behalf of multiple individuals. As a
result, an issuing bank is sometimes
unable to provide an accurate count of
all individuals receiving payments.
Section II: Government-Administered
Payment Cards (Current Survey)—
(Deleted)
The Board proposes to delete section
II (of the current survey), which
captures the number of prepaid cards
outstanding, and a breakout of this
number between cards that can be used
on single-message networks, dualmessage networks, and two or more
unaffiliated networks. The question
requesting the total number of cards
outstanding will be moved to the
section of the revised survey titled
‘‘Card Funding.’’ The remaining
questions in section II (of the current
survey), which focus on the network
functionality of the cards outstanding,
will be deleted.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In previous reports to the Congress on
government-administered, general-use
prepaid cards, the Board reported on
interchange fee statistics broken out by
single-message and dual-message
transactions. Interchange fee statistics
for the broader population of generaluse prepaid cards by network type are
published in the Board’s other reports
on covered debit card issuers and
payment card networks. Because
interchange fees by network type do not
vary substantially between governmentadministered, general-use prepaid cards
and the broader population of exempt
general-use prepaid cards, the Board
believes that it is no longer necessary to
collect network-related information in
this survey.
Section II: Card Funding (Renumbered
From ‘‘Section III’’ and Renamed From
‘‘Funding’’)
Question 1 (revised survey):
Government-administered, general-use
prepaid cards outstanding. As discussed
above, the Board proposes to move this
question from the deleted section titled
‘‘Government-Administered Payment
Cards’’.
Questions 2 and 3 (revised survey):
Net funds loaded onto governmentadministered, general-use prepaid cards.
Question 1 (of the current survey) asks
for the funds loaded onto governmentadministered, general-use prepaid cards.
The Board is aware that program funds
initially made available to a cardholder
may subsequently be removed from the
cardholder’s account; specifically, funds
may be voided or returned to the
government agency or other funding
entity. Funds may be removed from an
account due to unused balances after a
specified period of time, long-term
account inactivity, or some other reason
(unrelated to fees). The Board proposes
to clarify the current question on
funding by asking for the net funds
loaded onto cards (excluding funds
voided or returned) in question 2 (of the
revised survey) and for a breakout of net
funds loaded onto cards between gross
funds loaded and funds voided or
returned in question 3 (of the revised
survey). In addition to increasing survey
clarity, this breakout would allow the
Board to calculate additional
prevalence-of-use metrics.
Question 4 (revised survey): Net funds
loaded by funding source. The Board
proposes to add question 4 (to the
revised survey), which requests a
breakout of the net funds loaded onto
government-administered, general-use
prepaid cards between funds loaded
pursuant to various categories of
government-administered payment
programs and funds loaded from other
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 2014 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
sources. Collecting funding information
by program category type supports the
Board’s proposed revision to the
reporting structure which would allow
issuers to provide aggregate responses
for their programs. Further, for a
covered issuer to receive the exemption
from the interchange fee standards of
Regulation II with respect to cards
issued under a governmentadministered payment program,
cardholders may use their cards only to
transfer or debit funds, monetary value,
or other assets that have been provided
pursuant to the program. Question 4 (of
the revised survey) would allow the
Board to better understand whether (and
if so, the extent to which) issuers fulfill
this requirement to receive the
exemption.
Question 6 (revised survey): Average
daily value of funds outstanding. The
Board proposes to add question 6 (to the
revised survey) to capture average daily
balances on government-administered
general-use prepaid cards. Question 6
will allow the Board to calculate
additional prevalence-of-use metrics.
Section III: Cash Withdrawals
(Renumbered From ‘‘Section IV’’
Renamed From ‘‘ATM Transactions’’)
Questions 1: (current survey):
Government-administered, general-use
prepaid cards outstanding that can be
used to make ATM cash withdrawals.
The Board proposes to delete question
1 (of the current survey) because it is no
longer needed for the annual report.
Question 2 (revised survey): Total
ATM cash withdrawals. The Board
proposes to add question 2 (to the
revised survey) to obtain a breakout of
the total ATM cash withdrawal volume
and value between withdrawals at
proprietary (in-network) and
nonproprietary (out-of-network) ATMs.
This breakout would allow the Board to
calculate new prevalence-of-use metrics
related to ATM transactions and to
calculate ATM-fee metrics more
precisely.
Question 3a (revised survey): ATM
fees reimbursed to cardholders. The
Board proposes to add question 3a (to
the revised survey) to capture the value
of reimbursements made to cardholders
by issuers for ATM fees assessed by
ATM operators of nonproprietary (outof-network) ATMs for cash withdrawals.
Question 3a would allow the Board to
estimate cardholder fee metrics more
precisely.
Questions 4–6 (revised survey): Overthe-counter at-bank (teller) cash
withdrawals. The Board proposes to add
questions 4–6 (to the revised survey) to
capture information related to over-thecounter at-bank (teller) cash
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Sep 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
withdrawals. These questions mirror
questions 1–3 (of the revised survey) on
ATM withdrawals. Information on overthe-counter cash withdrawals would
allow the Board to calculate additional
prevalence of use metrics and estimate
fee metrics more precisely.
Section IV: Purchase Transactions
(Renumbered From ‘‘Section V’’)
Question 1 (revised survey): Settled
purchase transactions. The Board
proposes to specify that cash back
amounts should be included in the
value of settled purchase transactions.
The Board also proposes to add question
1a.1 (to the revised survey) to request a
breakout of the value of transactions
that included cash back between the
purchase value and cash-back value.
The Board believes the new language
and additional question will enhance
survey clarity. Further, the breakout of
the purchase and cash-back amounts
will allow the Board to calculate
additional prevalence-of-use metrics.
Question 2 (current survey): Settled
purchase transactions by network type.
The Board proposes to delete question
2 (of the current survey) which asks for
a breakout of total settled purchase
transactions (volume and value)
between single-message transactions
and dual-message transactions. As
discussed above in the paragraph titled
‘‘Section II: Government-Administered
Payment Cards (current survey),’’ the
Board believes that it is no longer
necessary to collect network-related
information in this survey.
Question 2 (revised survey): Exempt
vs. non-exempt transactions. The Board
proposes to add question 2 (to the
revised survey) to break out total settled
purchase transactions (volume and
value) between transactions that are
exempt and not exempt from the
interchange fee standards of Regulation
II.
An electronic debit transaction made
using a general-use prepaid card that
has been provided pursuant to a
government-administered payment
program is exempt from the interchange
fee standards for a given calendar year
if one of the following two conditions
applies:
(1) The issuer, along with its affiliates
worldwide, has assets that are less than
$10 billion, as of December 31 of the
prior calendar year.
(2) The issuer, along with its affiliates
worldwide, has assets that are greater
than or equal to $10 billion, as of
December 31 of the prior calendar year,
and all of the following conditions
apply:
• The cardholder may use the debit
card only to transfer or debit funds,
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56371
monetary value, or other assets that
have been provided pursuant to a
government-administered payment
program;
• The issuer does not charge a fee for
overdrafts, including a shortage of funds
or a transaction processed for an amount
exceeding the account balance, unless
the fee or charge is imposed for
transferring funds from another asset
account to cover a shortfall in the
account accessed by the card; and
• The issuer does not charge a fee for
the first withdrawal per calendar month
from an ATM that is part of the issuer’s
designated ATM network.
The breakout in question 2 (of the
revised survey) would allow the Board
to better understand whether (and if so,
the extent to which) issuers choose to
receive the exemption with respect to
their government-administered, generaluse prepaid card programs, and further,
would allow the Board to calculate
interchange fee metrics for both exempt
and non-exempt transactions.
Section V: Fees Paid by Issuers
(Renumbered From ‘‘Section VI’’)
There are no proposed changes to the
questions in this section.
Section VI: Issuer Revenue: Interchange
Fees (Renumbered From ‘‘Section VII’’)
Question 2 (current survey):
Interchange fee revenue by network
type. The Board proposes to delete
question 2 (of the current survey) which
asks for the breakout of total interchange
fee revenue between revenue received
from single-message transactions and
dual-message transactions. As discussed
above in the paragraph titled ‘‘Section
II: Government-Administered Payment
Cards (current survey)’’, the Board
believes that it is no longer necessary to
collect network-related information in
this survey.
Question 2 (revised survey): Exempt
vs. non-exempt transactions. The Board
proposes to add question 2 (to the
revised survey) to break out the total
interchange fee revenue between
interchange fee revenue from
transactions that are exempt and those
that are not exempt from the
interchange fee standards of Regulation
II. This breakout would allow the Board
to better understand whether (and if so,
the extent to which) issuers receive the
exemption from the interchange fee
standards of Regulation II with respect
to their government-administered
prepaid card programs, and, further,
would allow the Board to calculate
interchange-fee metrics for both exempt
and non-exempt transactions.
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
56372
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 2014 / Notices
Section VII: Issuer Revenue: Cardholder
Fees (Renumbered From ‘‘Section VIII’’)
The Board proposes to combine
relevant questions related to cardholder
fee revenue in sections XIII and IX (of
the current survey) to streamline the
survey and reduce reporting burden.
The current section IX, which contains
detailed questions on each type of
cardholder fee, would be eliminated,
significantly reducing the number of
questions in the survey.
Questions 1 and 2 (revised survey):
All fees assessed to cardholders.
Questions 1 and 2 (of the current
survey) ask for the total revenue
received from certain types of
cardholder fees. The Board proposes to
add a column of numerical boxes to
request the number of times each type
of fee was assessed, a column of
numerical boxes to request the number
of programs in which each type of fee
is subject to government-imposed
restrictions, and a column of text boxes
to request a description of governmentimposed restrictions on fees. These
additional questions appear in section
IX (of the current survey) titled ‘‘Fees
Assessed to Cardholders’’, which, as
discussed below, the Board is also
proposing to eliminate. In addition to
reducing reporting burden, the Board
believes that combining the questions
related to cardholder fee revenue with
those requesting the number of times
fees were assessed will increase survey
clarity and the quality of submitted
responses. Further, the numerical box
intended to collect the number of
programs in which each type of fee is
subject to government-imposed
restrictions allows issuers to report
aggregate information on government
imposed restrictions (in contrast to the
‘yes/no’ question format in the current
survey). Therefore, this new question
format supports the Board’s proposed
revision to the reporting structure which
would allow issuers to provide
aggregate responses for their programs.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Section XIII (Revised Survey): Issuer
Revenue: Other (New Section)
The Board proposes to create a new
section titled ‘‘Issuer Revenue: Other’’,
with four questions to capture revenue
received by issuers that are not captured
by the current survey:
Question 1 (revised survey): Total
revenue received from fees assessed to
government office(s).
Question 2 (revised survey): Total
value of incentive payments received
from payment card networks. Incentive
payments are payments received by an
issuer from a payment card network
with respect to debit card transactions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Sep 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
or debit-card-related activity. Issuer
incentives may be based on reaching
specified volume levels, promoting the
network’s brand through marketing
activities, converting the issuer’s debit
card base to a different signature
network, or undertaking other activities.
Incentive payments do not include
payments from a network to an issuer
for traditional banking services the
issuer provides the network (for
example, transaction account services to
the network).
Question 3 (revised survey): Total
revenue received from all other sources.
This new section will provide the
Board with a more complete picture of
the types of revenue received by issuers
of government-administered, generaluse prepaid cards.
Section IX: Fees Assessed to
Cardholders (Current Survey)—(Deleted)
The Board proposes to eliminate
section IX (of the current survey) to
reduce reporting burden. As discussed
above under the heading ‘‘Section VII:
Issuer Revenue: Cardholder Fees’’, the
Board proposes to combine specific
questions in sections XIII and IX (of the
current survey). Those questions in
section IX (of the current survey) that
were not combined with section XIII (of
the current survey) would be
eliminated. The Board believes that the
information captured in the deleted
questions are no longer relevant for the
report process.
Government Survey (3063b)
The government survey is voluntary
and is sent to state and local
government offices to submit
information about the prevalence of use
of general-use prepaid cards in federal,
state, and local governmentadministered payment programs. The
current government survey (last
administered in early 2014) comprises
three sections:
1. Government-Administered,
General-Use Prepaid Card Program
Information: Respondents report
summary information on the
government-administered payment
program(s) covered in the response,
whether the response covers federal or
state/local programs, sponsoring
government agency/agencies, cardissuing bank(s), the type of payment
program(s), the number of recipients
receiving payments (by any payment
method), and the number of recipients
receiving payments by prepaid cards.
2. Cards: Respondents report the
number of cards outstanding at yearend.
3. Funding: Respondents report the
value of funds loaded into prepaid card
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
accounts and the value of all funds paid
(by all payment methods).
Proposed Revisions to Government
Survey (FR 3063b)
Section I: Government-Administered,
General-Use Prepaid Card Program
Information
Question 1a (revised survey): Number
of government-administered payment
program(s) covered in this response.
The Board proposes to add question 1a
(to the revised survey) to obtain a more
accurate count of the programs
government offices are reporting on.
Question 2 (revised survey):
Sponsoring government agency. The
Board proposes to combine question 4
(of the current survey) which requests
the name of the sponsoring agency (the
agency administering a governmentadministered payment program) and
question 2 (of the current survey) which
asks whether the response covers a
state/local or federal program. The
combined question 2 (of the revised
survey) would ask for the name of the
sponsoring agency and whether the
sponsoring agency’s jurisdiction is state/
local or federal. The Board believes that
combining the two questions will
improve survey clarity and the quality
of submitted responses.
Section II: Number of Cards (Renamed
From ‘‘Government-Administered
Payment Cards’’)
There are no proposed changes to the
questions in this section.
Section III: Funds Disbursed to Payment
Recipients (Renamed From ‘‘Funding’’)
Questions 1 and 2: The Board
proposes to reorder and modify
questions 1 and 2. Respondents would
first report total funds disbursed in
question 1 (of the revised survey) and
break that figure out between funds
disbursed by prepaid cards and funds
disbursed by all other payment methods
in question 2 (of the revised survey).
The Board expects that this breakout
will improve question clarity and the
quality of submitted responses.
Additional Request for Comment
Regarding the Government Survey
The Board requests specific comment
regarding the potential impact of
eliminating the government survey (FR
3063b). The Board currently uses the
responses provided by government
agencies to calculate and report
prevalence-of-use metrics; specifically,
the government data allow the Board to
report the ratio of funds disbursed by
prepaid cards to funds disbursed by all
payment methods (check, ACH,
payment cards, etc.) across different
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 2014 / Notices
types of government-administered
payment programs. Should the Board
decide to eliminate the government
survey, it would rely on data from the
issuer survey (FR 3063a) to report on
prevalence of use. Because issuers of
government-administered prepaid cards
are unable to report on the value of
government-agency disbursements made
by payment methods other than prepaid
cards, the Board would not report the
ratio of funds disbursed by prepaid card
to funds disbursed by all payment
methods. However, the Board would
report alternative prevalence-of-use
metrics, including the value of funds
loaded onto government-administered
prepaid cards, the volume and value of
settled purchase transactions, and the
volume and value of ATM withdrawals.
The Board believes that eliminating
the government survey would
significantly reduce reporting burden on
the public. At the same time, however,
this change could increase burden on
the public in other respects, because
some members of the public may rely on
the prevalence-of-use ratio currently
reported by the Board. The Board
requests specific comment on whether
the potential benefits of eliminating the
government survey outweigh the
potential costs.
The Board also requests specific
comment regarding the existence of
reputable reports or other data sources
that would allow the Board to continue
to calculate the ratio of the value funds
disbursed by prepaid card to funds
disbursed by all payment methods. As
discussed above, the Board currently
collects prepaid card funding
information with the issuer survey. The
Board is interested in finding reputable
data sources containing the value of
funds disbursed by all payment
methods at the program category level.
For example, the Board has identified
potential data sources for four
categories:
1. Unemployment insurance
programs—the United States
Department of Labor publishes total
unemployment insurance outlays under
the Unemployment Insurance
Chartbook.
2. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP)—the United States
Department of Agriculture publishes
total outlays under the SNAP program
on its data Web site.
3. Payroll programs—the United
States Census Bureau publishes payroll
estimates for federal, state, and local
governments based on its Annual
Survey of Public Employment and
Payroll.
4. Temporary Assistance for Needy
Families (TANF) programs—The U.S.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Sep 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
Department of Health and Human
Services publishes annual TANF
expenditures on its data Web site.
The Board requests specific comment
on whether additional sources of
expenditure data at the program
category level exist.
The proposed revisions to both
surveys would be effective for the
collection during the first half of 2015
of calendar year 2014 data.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, September 16, 2014.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014–22357 Filed 9–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘FTC’’).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The FTC plans to conduct a
study to examine consumer perception
of environmental marketing claims. This
is the second of two notices required
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(‘‘PRA’’) in which the FTC seeks public
comments on its proposed consumer
research in connection with requesting
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) review of, and clearance for,
the collection of information discussed
herein.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 20, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write ‘‘Green Marketing
Consumer Perception Study, Project No.
P954501’’ on your comment, and file
your comment online at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
organicstudypra2, by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If
you prefer to file your comment on
paper, mail your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite
CC–5610 (Annex J), Washington, DC
20580, or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW.,
5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex J),
Washington, DC 20024.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56373
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hampton Newsome, Attorney, 202–326–
2889, or Laura Koss, Attorney, 202–326–
2890, Division of Enforcement, Bureau
of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Commission’s Guides for the Use
of Environmental Marketing Claims
(‘‘Green Guides’’ or ‘‘Guides’’) (16 CFR
part 260) help marketers avoid making
unfair and deceptive environmental
claims.1 The Guides outline general
principles that apply to all
environmental marketing claims and
provide guidance regarding specific
categories of such claims.2 These
categories include: General
environmental benefit claims such as
‘‘environmentally friendly’’; degradable
claims; compostable claims; recyclable
claims; recycled content claims; source
reduction claims; refillable claims; and
‘‘free-of’’ claims. The Green Guides
explain how reasonable consumers are
likely to interpret claims within these
categories. The Guides also describe the
basic elements necessary to substantiate
claims and present options for
qualifying them to avoid deception.3
The illustrative qualifications provide
‘‘safe harbors’’ for marketers who want
certainty, but do not represent the only
permissible approaches. Currently, the
Guides do not provide specific guidance
regarding ‘‘organic’’ claims.
II. The FTC’s Proposed Study
A. Study Description
The FTC plans to conduct Internetbased research to explore consumer
perceptions of certain environmental
marketing claims, such as ‘‘organic’’ and
‘‘recycled content,’’ to help the
Commission better advise marketers on
1 The Commission issued the Green Guides in
1992 (57 FR 36363) and subsequently revised them
in 1996 (61 FR 53311), 1998 (63 FR 24240), and
2012 (77 FR 62121).
2 15 U.S.C. 45(a). The Commission’s industry
guides, such as the Green Guides, are
administrative interpretations of the application of
Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 45(a), to
advertising claims. The Commission issues industry
guides to provide guidance for the public to
conform with legal requirements. These guides
provide the basis for voluntary abandonment of
unlawful practices by industry members. 16 CFR
part 17. The Guides do not have the force and effect
of law and are not independently enforceable.
However, the Commission can take action under the
FTC Act if a business makes environmental
marketing claims inconsistent with the Guides. In
any such enforcement action, the Commission must
prove that the act or practice at issue is unfair or
deceptive.
3 The Guides do not, however, establish standards
for environmental performance or prescribe testing
protocols.
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56368-56373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22357]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment
Request
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
SUMMARY: On June 15, 1984, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
delegated to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(Board) its approval authority under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.16, to approve of and assign OMB control numbers
to collection of information requests and requirements conducted or
sponsored by the Board under conditions set forth in 5 CFR 1320
Appendix A.1. Board-approved collections of information are
incorporated into the official OMB inventory of currently approved
collections of information. Copies of the Paperwork Reduction Act
Submission, supporting statements and approved collection of
information instruments are placed into OMB's public docket files. The
Federal Reserve may not conduct or sponsor, and the respondent is not
required to respond to, an information collection that has been
extended, revised, or implemented on or after October 1, 1995, unless
it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 18, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by FR 3063a or b
(government-administered, general-use prepaid cards); by any of the
following methods:
Agency Web site: https://www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments at https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/foia/proposedregs.aspx.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov. Include OMB
number in the subject line of the message.
FAX: (202) 452-3819 or (202) 452-3102.
Mail: Robert deV. Frierson, Secretary, Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20551.
All public comments are available from the Board's Web site at
https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/foia/proposedregs.aspx as submitted,
unless modified for technical reasons. Accordingly, your comments will
not be edited to remove any identifying or contact information. Public
comments may also be viewed electronically or in paper form in Room MP-
500 of the Board's Martin Building (20th and C Streets NW.) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays.
Additionally, commenters may send a copy of their comments to the
OMB Desk Officer--Shagufta Ahmed--Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office
Building, Room 10235 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503 or by
fax to (202) 395-6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of the PRA OMB submission,
including the proposed reporting form and instructions, supporting
statement, and other documentation will be placed into OMB's public
docket files, once approved. These documents will also be made
available on the Federal Reserve Board's public Web site at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/reportforms/review.aspx or may be requested
from the agency clearance officer, whose name appears below.
Federal Reserve Board Acting Clearance Officer--John Schmidt--
Office of the Chief Data Officer, Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551 (202) 452-3829. Telecommunications
Device for the Deaf (TDD) users may contact (202) 263-4869, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comment on Information Collection Proposals
The following information collections, which are being handled
under this delegated authority, have received initial Board approval
and are hereby published for comment. At the end of the comment period,
the proposed information collections, along with an analysis of
comments and recommendations received, will be submitted to the Board
for final approval under OMB delegated authority. Comments are invited
on the following:
a. Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the Federal Reserve's functions; including
whether the information has practical utility;
b. The accuracy of the Federal Reserve's estimate of the burden of
the proposed information collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
c. Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;
d. Ways to minimize the burden of information collection on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology; and
e. Estimates of capital or start up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.
Proposal to approve under OMB delegated authority the extension for
three years of the following information collection, with revision:
Report title: Government-administered, General-use Prepaid Card
Surveys.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The issuer and government surveys, supporting statement, and
other documentation are available on the Board's public Web site at:
https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/reportforms/review.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency form number: FR 3063a and FR 3063b.
OMB control number: 7100-0343.
Frequency: Annual.
Reporters: Issuers of government-administered, general-use prepaid
cards (FR 3063a) and governments that administer general-use prepaid
card programs (FR 3063b).
Estimated annual reporting hours: FR 3063a: 375 hours; FR 3063b:
2,700 hours.
Estimated average hours per response: FR 3063a: 25 hours; FR 3063b:
15 hours.
Number of respondents: FR 3063a: 15; FR 3063b: 180.
General description of report: This information collection is
authorized by subsection 920(a) of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act
(EFTA), which was amended by section 1075(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act. 15
U.S.C. Sec. 1693o-2. EFTA Section 920(a) requires the Board to submit
an annual report to the Congress on the prevalence of the use of
general-use prepaid cards in Federal, State, or local government-
administered payment programs and on the interchange transaction fees
and cardholder fees charged with respect to the use of such general-use
prepaid cards. 15 U.S.C. 1693o-2(a)(7)(D). EFTA Section 920(a) also
provides the Board with authority to require issuers to
[[Page 56369]]
provide information to enable the Board to carry out the provisions of
the subsection. 15 U.S.C. 1693o-2(a)(3)(B). The obligation of issuers
to respond to the issuer survey (FR 3063a) is mandatory. However, the
obligation of state and local governments to respond to the government
survey (FR 3063b) is voluntary. A limited amount of information
collected on the FR 3063a issuer survey is publicly available, and
thus, is not accorded confidential treatment. However, most of the
information collected on the FR 3063a issuer survey is not publicly
available and may be kept confidential as explained herein. Data
collected by the issuer survey may be kept confidential under exemption
(b)(4) of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which exempts from
disclosure ``trade secrets and commercial or financial information
obtained from a person and privileged or confidential.'' 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(4). Such data may be kept confidential under exemption 4 if the
release of data would cause substantial harm to the competitive
position of the issuer. For example, certain issuer survey responses
would likely contain information related to an organization's revenue
structure and other proprietary and commercial information and the
release of such information would cause substantial harm to the
competitive position of the issuer and could therefore be kept
confidential under exemption 4. The information collected on the
government survey (FR 3063b) is not accorded confidential treatment.
Abstract: Section 1075(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act provides that the
Board shall provide annually a report to the Congress regarding the
prevalence of the use of general-use prepaid cards in federal, state,
and local government-administered payment programs, and the interchange
and cardholder fees charged with respect to the use of such prepaid
cards.\2\ Section 1075(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act also provides the Board
with authority to require card issuers to respond to information
requests as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of the
section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 1693o-2(a)(7)(D).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Actions: The Board proposes to revise the issuer survey (FR
3063a) to collect data on the number of government programs broken out
by category of disbursement program; net funds loaded onto prepaid
cards broken out by gross funds loaded and funds voided or returned to
government offices, as well as by funds loaded pursuant to government-
administered programs and funds loaded from other sources; the average
daily value of funds outstanding; the value and volume of ATM
withdrawals broken out by proprietary (in-network) ATMs and
nonproprietary (out-of-network) ATMs; the amount reimbursed cardholders
for fees they incurred at nonproprietary ATMs; the value/volume of
over-the-counter at-bank (teller) withdrawals as well as fees assessed
to cardholders by third party banks for these withdrawals; the value of
settled purchase transactions and interchange fee revenue broken out by
transactions that are exempt and not exempt from the interchange fee
standards of Regulation II; and sources of revenue collected by issuers
other than interchange and cardholder fees. The Board also proposes to
combine current sections II and III as well as current sections XIII
and IX. In addition, the Board proposes that issuers not be required to
complete a separate survey for each program. Rather, issuers would be
required to complete one survey for federal programs in aggregate and
one survey for state/local programs in aggregate.
The Board proposes to revise the government survey (FR 3063b) to
collect data on the number of government programs reported in the
survey. In addition, the Board proposes to requests public comment on
the potential effects of repealing the FR 3063b survey.
Lastly, the Board proposes to make several clarifications to both
surveys and to delete questions that are no longer relevant from both
surveys.
Issuer Survey (FR 3063a)
The issuer survey is required for depository institutions that
issue general-use prepaid cards for federal, state, or local
government-administered payment programs. The survey requests
information on cards associated with accounts domiciled in the United
States, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories.
The current survey (last administered in early 2014) collects
information separately for each government-administered payment program
for which the depository institution is the issuer of general-use
prepaid cards. The current survey collects information on card programs
using two types of authentication mechanisms: Dual-message transactions
and single-message transactions.\3\ The cards issued pursuant to
government-administered payment programs may be either reloadable or
non-reloadable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In dual-message transactions, authorization information is
carried in one message and clearing information is carried in a
separate message (typically, these transactions are authenticated
with a signature). In single-message transactions, authorization and
clearing information is carried in one message (typically, these
transactions are authenticated with a PIN). General-use prepaid card
transactions may use either method (although dual-message
transactions are more common).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The current issuer survey comprises nine sections:
I. Government-Administered, General-Use Prepaid Card Program
Information: Respondents report summary information on card programs
covered in the response including the name of the program(s), whether
the response covers federal or state/local programs, the geographic
areas where cards have been issued, the name of the sponsoring
government agency, the type of payment program, and the number of
recipients receiving payments on prepaid cards.
II. Government-Administered Payment Cards: Respondents report
summary information on the number of cards outstanding and the
allocation of cards outstanding between cards that can be used on both
dual-message and single-message networks, cards that can be used
exclusively on dual-message networks, and cards that can be used on
exclusively single-message networks. Respondents also report the number
of cards that can be used on two or more unaffiliated networks.
III. Funding: Respondents report the value of funds loaded into
prepaid card accounts and funds outstanding on prepaid card accounts.
IV. ATM Transactions: Respondents report summary information on the
number of cards outstanding at year-end that can be used to make ATM
cash withdrawals, the volume and value of ATM cash withdrawals, and the
ATM fees assessed to cardholders by ATM operators of nonproprietary
(out-of-network) ATMs.
V. Purchase Transactions: Respondents report summary information on
the volume and value of settled purchase transactions and the
allocation of the volume and value of settled purchase transactions
between single-message transactions and dual-message transactions.
VI. Fees Paid by Issuers: Respondents report the fees paid by
issuers to third parties for ATM cash withdrawals and over-the-counter
(OTC) at-bank (teller) cash withdrawals.
VII. Issuer Revenue: Interchange Fees: Respondents report
interchange fee revenue received on settled purchase transactions and
the allocation of interchange fee revenue received on dual-message
transactions and single-message transactions.
VIII. Issuer Revenue: Cardholder Fees: Respondents report total
revenue received on all fees assessed to cardholders and the allocation
revenue received from cardholder fees between purchase transaction
fees, ATM fees,
[[Page 56370]]
OTC fees, account servicing fees, routine monthly fees, customer
service inquiry fees, penalty fees, overdraft fees, and all other
cardholder fees.
IX. Fees Assessed to Cardholders: Respondents provide summary
information on fees assessed to cardholders, including purchase
transaction fees, ATM fees, OTC fees, account servicing fees, routine
monthly fees, customer service inquiry fees, penalty fees, overdraft
fees and all other cardholder fees.
Proposed Revisions to Issuer Survey (FR 3063a)
The Board proposes to modify the survey reporting structure to
reduce burden on respondents. Currently, a respondent is required to
complete the survey for each individual government-administered payment
program for which the respondent is the prepaid card issuer. The Board
has modified the survey instrument so that issuers will be required to
complete the survey only twice: Once for all federal programs (in
aggregate) and once for all state/local programs (in aggregate). The
Board believes that the proposed structure will reduce reporting burden
without significantly compromising the value of the data collected. In
addition, the Board proposes to streamline the survey by combining
relevant questions in current sections II and III and combining
relevant questions in current sections XIII and IX. A section-by-
section description of the changes is provided below.
Section I: Program Information (Renamed From ``Government-Administered,
General-Use Prepaid Card Program Information'')
Questions 1 and 2 (revised survey): Number of government-
administered payment program(s) covered in this response. The Board
proposes to add question 1 (to the revised survey) to obtain an
accurate count of the government-administered payment programs on which
issuers will report. The Board also proposes to add question 2 (to the
revised survey) which requests a breakout of the number of programs
between program categories (such as child support, payroll, and so on).
This breakout replaces question 5 (of the current survey) which asks
issuers to indicate (via a check box) categories on an individual
program basis. Questions 1 and 2 (of the revised survey) support the
Board's proposed revision to the reporting structure which would allow
issuers to provide aggregate responses for their programs.
Question 2 (current survey): Does this response cover a federal or
a state/local program(s)? The Board proposes to delete question 2 (of
the current survey). Under the proposed revision to the reporting
structure, respondents would complete the survey once for federal
programs and once for state/local programs.
Question 3 (current survey): Jurisdiction(s)--Geographic area in
which the government-administered, general-use prepaid cards have been
issued.
The Board proposes to delete question 3 (of the current survey).
The Board believes that the information captured in this question is no
longer necessary to support the Board's annual report.
Question 3 (revised survey): Name of program and sponsoring
government agency. The Board proposes to combine question 1 (of the
current survey) which asks for the name of the government-administered
payment program and question 4 (of the current survey) which requests
the name of the sponsoring government agency (the agency administering
a government-administered payment program). The combined question 3 (of
the proposed survey) provides a grid of input boxes so that a
respondent can enter information separately for each government program
included in a response. This new format supports the Board's proposed
revision to the reporting structure which would allow issuers to
provide aggregate responses for their programs.
Question 6 (current survey): Recipients receiving payments on
government-administered, general-use prepaid cards. The Board proposes
to delete question 6 (of the current survey). A cardholder may receive
payments on behalf of multiple individuals. As a result, an issuing
bank is sometimes unable to provide an accurate count of all
individuals receiving payments.
Section II: Government-Administered Payment Cards (Current Survey)--
(Deleted)
The Board proposes to delete section II (of the current survey),
which captures the number of prepaid cards outstanding, and a breakout
of this number between cards that can be used on single-message
networks, dual-message networks, and two or more unaffiliated networks.
The question requesting the total number of cards outstanding will be
moved to the section of the revised survey titled ``Card Funding.'' The
remaining questions in section II (of the current survey), which focus
on the network functionality of the cards outstanding, will be deleted.
In previous reports to the Congress on government-administered,
general-use prepaid cards, the Board reported on interchange fee
statistics broken out by single-message and dual-message transactions.
Interchange fee statistics for the broader population of general-use
prepaid cards by network type are published in the Board's other
reports on covered debit card issuers and payment card networks.
Because interchange fees by network type do not vary substantially
between government-administered, general-use prepaid cards and the
broader population of exempt general-use prepaid cards, the Board
believes that it is no longer necessary to collect network-related
information in this survey.
Section II: Card Funding (Renumbered From ``Section III'' and Renamed
From ``Funding'')
Question 1 (revised survey): Government-administered, general-use
prepaid cards outstanding. As discussed above, the Board proposes to
move this question from the deleted section titled ``Government-
Administered Payment Cards''.
Questions 2 and 3 (revised survey): Net funds loaded onto
government-administered, general-use prepaid cards. Question 1 (of the
current survey) asks for the funds loaded onto government-administered,
general-use prepaid cards. The Board is aware that program funds
initially made available to a cardholder may subsequently be removed
from the cardholder's account; specifically, funds may be voided or
returned to the government agency or other funding entity. Funds may be
removed from an account due to unused balances after a specified period
of time, long-term account inactivity, or some other reason (unrelated
to fees). The Board proposes to clarify the current question on funding
by asking for the net funds loaded onto cards (excluding funds voided
or returned) in question 2 (of the revised survey) and for a breakout
of net funds loaded onto cards between gross funds loaded and funds
voided or returned in question 3 (of the revised survey). In addition
to increasing survey clarity, this breakout would allow the Board to
calculate additional prevalence-of-use metrics.
Question 4 (revised survey): Net funds loaded by funding source.
The Board proposes to add question 4 (to the revised survey), which
requests a breakout of the net funds loaded onto government-
administered, general-use prepaid cards between funds loaded pursuant
to various categories of government-administered payment programs and
funds loaded from other
[[Page 56371]]
sources. Collecting funding information by program category type
supports the Board's proposed revision to the reporting structure which
would allow issuers to provide aggregate responses for their programs.
Further, for a covered issuer to receive the exemption from the
interchange fee standards of Regulation II with respect to cards issued
under a government-administered payment program, cardholders may use
their cards only to transfer or debit funds, monetary value, or other
assets that have been provided pursuant to the program. Question 4 (of
the revised survey) would allow the Board to better understand whether
(and if so, the extent to which) issuers fulfill this requirement to
receive the exemption.
Question 6 (revised survey): Average daily value of funds
outstanding. The Board proposes to add question 6 (to the revised
survey) to capture average daily balances on government-administered
general-use prepaid cards. Question 6 will allow the Board to calculate
additional prevalence-of-use metrics.
Section III: Cash Withdrawals (Renumbered From ``Section IV'' Renamed
From ``ATM Transactions'')
Questions 1: (current survey): Government-administered, general-use
prepaid cards outstanding that can be used to make ATM cash
withdrawals. The Board proposes to delete question 1 (of the current
survey) because it is no longer needed for the annual report.
Question 2 (revised survey): Total ATM cash withdrawals. The Board
proposes to add question 2 (to the revised survey) to obtain a breakout
of the total ATM cash withdrawal volume and value between withdrawals
at proprietary (in-network) and nonproprietary (out-of-network) ATMs.
This breakout would allow the Board to calculate new prevalence-of-use
metrics related to ATM transactions and to calculate ATM-fee metrics
more precisely.
Question 3a (revised survey): ATM fees reimbursed to cardholders.
The Board proposes to add question 3a (to the revised survey) to
capture the value of reimbursements made to cardholders by issuers for
ATM fees assessed by ATM operators of nonproprietary (out-of-network)
ATMs for cash withdrawals. Question 3a would allow the Board to
estimate cardholder fee metrics more precisely.
Questions 4-6 (revised survey): Over-the-counter at-bank (teller)
cash withdrawals. The Board proposes to add questions 4-6 (to the
revised survey) to capture information related to over-the-counter at-
bank (teller) cash withdrawals. These questions mirror questions 1-3
(of the revised survey) on ATM withdrawals. Information on over-the-
counter cash withdrawals would allow the Board to calculate additional
prevalence of use metrics and estimate fee metrics more precisely.
Section IV: Purchase Transactions (Renumbered From ``Section V'')
Question 1 (revised survey): Settled purchase transactions. The
Board proposes to specify that cash back amounts should be included in
the value of settled purchase transactions. The Board also proposes to
add question 1a.1 (to the revised survey) to request a breakout of the
value of transactions that included cash back between the purchase
value and cash-back value. The Board believes the new language and
additional question will enhance survey clarity. Further, the breakout
of the purchase and cash-back amounts will allow the Board to calculate
additional prevalence-of-use metrics.
Question 2 (current survey): Settled purchase transactions by
network type. The Board proposes to delete question 2 (of the current
survey) which asks for a breakout of total settled purchase
transactions (volume and value) between single-message transactions and
dual-message transactions. As discussed above in the paragraph titled
``Section II: Government-Administered Payment Cards (current survey),''
the Board believes that it is no longer necessary to collect network-
related information in this survey.
Question 2 (revised survey): Exempt vs. non-exempt transactions.
The Board proposes to add question 2 (to the revised survey) to break
out total settled purchase transactions (volume and value) between
transactions that are exempt and not exempt from the interchange fee
standards of Regulation II.
An electronic debit transaction made using a general-use prepaid
card that has been provided pursuant to a government-administered
payment program is exempt from the interchange fee standards for a
given calendar year if one of the following two conditions applies:
(1) The issuer, along with its affiliates worldwide, has assets
that are less than $10 billion, as of December 31 of the prior calendar
year.
(2) The issuer, along with its affiliates worldwide, has assets
that are greater than or equal to $10 billion, as of December 31 of the
prior calendar year, and all of the following conditions apply:
The cardholder may use the debit card only to transfer or
debit funds, monetary value, or other assets that have been provided
pursuant to a government-administered payment program;
The issuer does not charge a fee for overdrafts, including
a shortage of funds or a transaction processed for an amount exceeding
the account balance, unless the fee or charge is imposed for
transferring funds from another asset account to cover a shortfall in
the account accessed by the card; and
The issuer does not charge a fee for the first withdrawal
per calendar month from an ATM that is part of the issuer's designated
ATM network.
The breakout in question 2 (of the revised survey) would allow the
Board to better understand whether (and if so, the extent to which)
issuers choose to receive the exemption with respect to their
government-administered, general-use prepaid card programs, and
further, would allow the Board to calculate interchange fee metrics for
both exempt and non-exempt transactions.
Section V: Fees Paid by Issuers (Renumbered From ``Section VI'')
There are no proposed changes to the questions in this section.
Section VI: Issuer Revenue: Interchange Fees (Renumbered From ``Section
VII'')
Question 2 (current survey): Interchange fee revenue by network
type. The Board proposes to delete question 2 (of the current survey)
which asks for the breakout of total interchange fee revenue between
revenue received from single-message transactions and dual-message
transactions. As discussed above in the paragraph titled ``Section II:
Government-Administered Payment Cards (current survey)'', the Board
believes that it is no longer necessary to collect network-related
information in this survey.
Question 2 (revised survey): Exempt vs. non-exempt transactions.
The Board proposes to add question 2 (to the revised survey) to break
out the total interchange fee revenue between interchange fee revenue
from transactions that are exempt and those that are not exempt from
the interchange fee standards of Regulation II. This breakout would
allow the Board to better understand whether (and if so, the extent to
which) issuers receive the exemption from the interchange fee standards
of Regulation II with respect to their government-administered prepaid
card programs, and, further, would allow the Board to calculate
interchange-fee metrics for both exempt and non-exempt transactions.
[[Page 56372]]
Section VII: Issuer Revenue: Cardholder Fees (Renumbered From ``Section
VIII'')
The Board proposes to combine relevant questions related to
cardholder fee revenue in sections XIII and IX (of the current survey)
to streamline the survey and reduce reporting burden. The current
section IX, which contains detailed questions on each type of
cardholder fee, would be eliminated, significantly reducing the number
of questions in the survey.
Questions 1 and 2 (revised survey): All fees assessed to
cardholders. Questions 1 and 2 (of the current survey) ask for the
total revenue received from certain types of cardholder fees. The Board
proposes to add a column of numerical boxes to request the number of
times each type of fee was assessed, a column of numerical boxes to
request the number of programs in which each type of fee is subject to
government-imposed restrictions, and a column of text boxes to request
a description of government-imposed restrictions on fees. These
additional questions appear in section IX (of the current survey)
titled ``Fees Assessed to Cardholders'', which, as discussed below, the
Board is also proposing to eliminate. In addition to reducing reporting
burden, the Board believes that combining the questions related to
cardholder fee revenue with those requesting the number of times fees
were assessed will increase survey clarity and the quality of submitted
responses. Further, the numerical box intended to collect the number of
programs in which each type of fee is subject to government-imposed
restrictions allows issuers to report aggregate information on
government imposed restrictions (in contrast to the `yes/no' question
format in the current survey). Therefore, this new question format
supports the Board's proposed revision to the reporting structure which
would allow issuers to provide aggregate responses for their programs.
Section XIII (Revised Survey): Issuer Revenue: Other (New Section)
The Board proposes to create a new section titled ``Issuer Revenue:
Other'', with four questions to capture revenue received by issuers
that are not captured by the current survey:
Question 1 (revised survey): Total revenue received from fees
assessed to government office(s).
Question 2 (revised survey): Total value of incentive payments
received from payment card networks. Incentive payments are payments
received by an issuer from a payment card network with respect to debit
card transactions or debit-card-related activity. Issuer incentives may
be based on reaching specified volume levels, promoting the network's
brand through marketing activities, converting the issuer's debit card
base to a different signature network, or undertaking other activities.
Incentive payments do not include payments from a network to an issuer
for traditional banking services the issuer provides the network (for
example, transaction account services to the network).
Question 3 (revised survey): Total revenue received from all other
sources.
This new section will provide the Board with a more complete
picture of the types of revenue received by issuers of government-
administered, general-use prepaid cards.
Section IX: Fees Assessed to Cardholders (Current Survey)--(Deleted)
The Board proposes to eliminate section IX (of the current survey)
to reduce reporting burden. As discussed above under the heading
``Section VII: Issuer Revenue: Cardholder Fees'', the Board proposes to
combine specific questions in sections XIII and IX (of the current
survey). Those questions in section IX (of the current survey) that
were not combined with section XIII (of the current survey) would be
eliminated. The Board believes that the information captured in the
deleted questions are no longer relevant for the report process.
Government Survey (3063b)
The government survey is voluntary and is sent to state and local
government offices to submit information about the prevalence of use of
general-use prepaid cards in federal, state, and local government-
administered payment programs. The current government survey (last
administered in early 2014) comprises three sections:
1. Government-Administered, General-Use Prepaid Card Program
Information: Respondents report summary information on the government-
administered payment program(s) covered in the response, whether the
response covers federal or state/local programs, sponsoring government
agency/agencies, card-issuing bank(s), the type of payment program(s),
the number of recipients receiving payments (by any payment method),
and the number of recipients receiving payments by prepaid cards.
2. Cards: Respondents report the number of cards outstanding at
year-end.
3. Funding: Respondents report the value of funds loaded into
prepaid card accounts and the value of all funds paid (by all payment
methods).
Proposed Revisions to Government Survey (FR 3063b)
Section I: Government-Administered, General-Use Prepaid Card Program
Information
Question 1a (revised survey): Number of government-administered
payment program(s) covered in this response. The Board proposes to add
question 1a (to the revised survey) to obtain a more accurate count of
the programs government offices are reporting on.
Question 2 (revised survey): Sponsoring government agency. The
Board proposes to combine question 4 (of the current survey) which
requests the name of the sponsoring agency (the agency administering a
government-administered payment program) and question 2 (of the current
survey) which asks whether the response covers a state/local or federal
program. The combined question 2 (of the revised survey) would ask for
the name of the sponsoring agency and whether the sponsoring agency's
jurisdiction is state/local or federal. The Board believes that
combining the two questions will improve survey clarity and the quality
of submitted responses.
Section II: Number of Cards (Renamed From ``Government-Administered
Payment Cards'')
There are no proposed changes to the questions in this section.
Section III: Funds Disbursed to Payment Recipients (Renamed From
``Funding'')
Questions 1 and 2: The Board proposes to reorder and modify
questions 1 and 2. Respondents would first report total funds disbursed
in question 1 (of the revised survey) and break that figure out between
funds disbursed by prepaid cards and funds disbursed by all other
payment methods in question 2 (of the revised survey). The Board
expects that this breakout will improve question clarity and the
quality of submitted responses.
Additional Request for Comment Regarding the Government Survey
The Board requests specific comment regarding the potential impact
of eliminating the government survey (FR 3063b). The Board currently
uses the responses provided by government agencies to calculate and
report prevalence-of-use metrics; specifically, the government data
allow the Board to report the ratio of funds disbursed by prepaid cards
to funds disbursed by all payment methods (check, ACH, payment cards,
etc.) across different
[[Page 56373]]
types of government-administered payment programs. Should the Board
decide to eliminate the government survey, it would rely on data from
the issuer survey (FR 3063a) to report on prevalence of use. Because
issuers of government-administered prepaid cards are unable to report
on the value of government-agency disbursements made by payment methods
other than prepaid cards, the Board would not report the ratio of funds
disbursed by prepaid card to funds disbursed by all payment methods.
However, the Board would report alternative prevalence-of-use metrics,
including the value of funds loaded onto government-administered
prepaid cards, the volume and value of settled purchase transactions,
and the volume and value of ATM withdrawals.
The Board believes that eliminating the government survey would
significantly reduce reporting burden on the public. At the same time,
however, this change could increase burden on the public in other
respects, because some members of the public may rely on the
prevalence-of-use ratio currently reported by the Board. The Board
requests specific comment on whether the potential benefits of
eliminating the government survey outweigh the potential costs.
The Board also requests specific comment regarding the existence of
reputable reports or other data sources that would allow the Board to
continue to calculate the ratio of the value funds disbursed by prepaid
card to funds disbursed by all payment methods. As discussed above, the
Board currently collects prepaid card funding information with the
issuer survey. The Board is interested in finding reputable data
sources containing the value of funds disbursed by all payment methods
at the program category level. For example, the Board has identified
potential data sources for four categories:
1. Unemployment insurance programs--the United States Department of
Labor publishes total unemployment insurance outlays under the
Unemployment Insurance Chartbook.
2. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)--the United
States Department of Agriculture publishes total outlays under the SNAP
program on its data Web site.
3. Payroll programs--the United States Census Bureau publishes
payroll estimates for federal, state, and local governments based on
its Annual Survey of Public Employment and Payroll.
4. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) programs--The
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services publishes annual TANF
expenditures on its data Web site.
The Board requests specific comment on whether additional sources
of expenditure data at the program category level exist.
The proposed revisions to both surveys would be effective for the
collection during the first half of 2015 of calendar year 2014 data.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 16,
2014.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-22357 Filed 9-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P