Change in Accredited Laboratory Fees, 56235-56238 [2014-22208]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
and inspect lots not designated by the
electronic inspection system.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) All products, required by this part
to be inspected, shall be inspected only
at an official establishment or at an
official import inspection establishment
approved by the Administrator as
provided in this section. Such approved
official import inspection
establishments will be listed in the
Meat, Poultry and Egg Product
Inspection Directory, published by the
Food Safety and Inspection Service. The
listing will categorize the kind or kinds
of product which may be inspected at
each official import inspection
establishment, based on the adequacy of
the facilities for making such
inspections and handling such products
in a sanitary manner.
(f) Owners or operators of
establishments, other than official
establishments, who want to have
import inspections made at their
establishments, shall apply to the
Administrator for approval of their
establishments for such purpose.
Application shall be made on a form
furnished by the Program, Food Safety
and Inspection Service, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Washington, DC, and
shall include all information called for
by that form.
(g) Approval for Federal import
inspection shall be in accordance with
subpart D of this part.
(h) Owners or operators of
establishments at which import
inspections of product are to be made
shall furnish adequate sanitary facilities
and equipment for examination of such
product. The requirements of §§ 381.21
and 381.36, and part 416 of this chapter
shall apply as conditions for approval of
establishments as official import
inspection establishments to the same
extent and in the same manner as they
apply with respect to official
establishments.
(i) The Administrator is authorized to
approve any establishment as an official
import inspection establishment
provided that an application has been
filed and drawings have been submitted
in accordance with the requirements of
paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section
and he determines that such
establishment meets the requirements
under paragraph (e) of this section. Any
application for inspection under this
section may be denied or refused in
accordance with the rules of practice in
part 500 of this chapter.
(j) Approval of an official import
inspection establishment may be
withdrawn in accordance with
applicable rules of practice if it is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Sep 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
determined that the sanitary conditions
are such that the product is rendered
adulterated, that such action is
authorized by section 21(b) of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as
amended (84 Stat. 91), or that the
requirements of paragraph (e) of this
section were not complied with.
Approval may also be withdrawn in
accordance with section 401 of the Act
and applicable rules of practice.
(k) A special official number shall be
assigned to each official import
inspection establishment. Such number
shall be used to identify all products
inspected and passed for entry at the
establishment.
PART 590—INSPECTION OF EGGS
AND EGG PRODUCTS (EGG
PRODUCTS INSPECTION ACT)
17. The authority citation for part 590
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 1031–1056.
18. Revise § 590.915 to read as
follows:
■
§ 590.915 Foreign inspection certificate
requirements.
(a) Except as provided in § 590.960,
each consignment imported into the
United States must have an electronic
foreign inspection certification or a
paper foreign inspection certificate
issued by an official of the foreign
government agency responsible for the
inspection and certification of the
product.
(b) An official of the foreign
government agency must certify that any
product described on any official
certificate was produced in accordance
with the regulatory requirements
§ 590.910.
(c) The electronic foreign inspection
certification must be in English, be
transmitted directly to FSIS before the
product’s arrival at the official import
inspection establishment, and be
available to import inspection
personnel.
(d) The paper foreign inspection
certificate must accompany each
consignment; be submitted to import
inspection personnel at the official
import inspection establishment; be in
English; and bear the official seal of the
foreign government responsible for the
inspection of the product, and the name,
title, and signature of the official
authorized to issue the inspection
certificates for products imported into
the United States.
(e) The electronic foreign inspection
certification and paper foreign
inspection certificate must contain:
(1) The date;
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56235
(2) The foreign country of export and
the producing foreign establishment
number;
(3) The species used to produce the
product and the source country and
foreign establishment number, if the
source materials originate from a
country other than the exporting
country;
(4) The product’s description
including the process category, the
product category, and the product
group;
(5) The name and address of the
importer or consignee;
(6) The name and address of the
exporter or consignor;
(7) The number of units (pieces or
containers) and the shipping or
identification mark on the units;
(8) The net weight of each lot; and
(9) Any additional information the
Administrator requests to determine
whether the product is eligible to be
imported into the United States.
■ 19. Revise § 590.920 to read as
follows:
§ 590.920
Import inspection application.
(a) Applicants must submit an import
inspection application to apply for the
inspection of any product offered for
entry. Applicants may apply for
inspection using a paper or electronic
application form.
(b) Import inspection applications for
each consignment must be submitted
(electronically or on paper) to FSIS in
advance of the shipment’s arrival at the
official import establishment where the
product will be reinspected, but no later
than when the entry is filed with U.S.
Customs and Border Protection.
(c) The provisions of this section do
not apply to products that are exempted
from inspection by §§ 590.960 and
590.965.
Done at Washington, DC, on September 11,
2014.
Alfred V. Almanza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014–22206 Filed 9–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 391
[Docket No. FSIS–2014–0026]
RIN 0583–AD
Change in Accredited Laboratory Fees
Food Safety and Inspection
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
19SER1
56236
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
The Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS) is amending
its regulations to change the fees it
charges for the accreditation and the
maintenance of accreditation of nonFederal laboratories for the FSIS
Accredited Lab Program (ALP). The fees
in this final rule will be applied on the
effective date.
DATES: This final rule is effective
November 18, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Williams, Room 6065, South
Agriculture Building, 1400
Independence Ave. SW., Washington,
DC 20250–0235, Phone: (202) 720–5627,
Email: charles.williams@fsis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
FSIS has been delegated the authority
to exercise the functions of the Secretary
of Agriculture (7 CFR 2.18, 2.53) as
specified in the Federal Meat Inspection
Act (FMIA) (21 U.S.C. 601, et seq.) and
the Poultry Products Inspection Act
(PPIA) (21 U.S.C. 451, et seq.). FSIS
protects the public by verifying that
meat and poultry products are
wholesome, not adulterated, and
properly marked, labeled, and packaged.
In addition, under the Food,
Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade
Act of 1990, as amended (7 U.S.C. 138–
138i), FSIS has authority to accredit
non-Federal laboratories. The
accreditation allows non-Federal
laboratories to conduct analyses of
official regulatory meat and poultry
samples. One provision (7 U.S.C. 138f)
requires that a laboratory seeking
accreditation under the 1990 Act or
under the FMIA or PPIA pay a non-
refundable accreditation fee to cover the
costs of the Accredited Laboratory
Program.
Proposed and Final Rules
On April 21, 2014, FSIS published a
proposed rule to amend 9 CFR 391.5(a)
to change the fee structure for the
accreditation and the maintenance of
the accreditation of laboratories for the
FSIS Accredited Laboratory Program
(ALP) (79 FR 22052). FSIS did not
receive any comment on the proposed
rule. Hence, it is adopting the proposed
rule in its entirety as its final rule.
FSIS explained in the proposed rule
that under the regulations currently in
effect, FSIS charges each laboratory a
flat annual fee of $5,000 per
accreditation or maintenance of
accreditation. FSIS further explained
that a laboratory may apply for FSIS
accreditation and maintenance of
accreditation in one to six analyte
classes: Food Chemistry, chlorinated
hydrocarbons (CHCs), polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs), arsenic, nitrosamines,
and sulfonamides. Under the
regulations currently in effect, FSIS
charges laboratories the flat rate of
$5,000 for each accreditation obtained
regardless of the type or the number of
accreditations. A laboratory accredited
for all six analyte classes is charged a
total fee of $30,000. FSIS bills annually
for the costs of the services it provides
the laboratories, including the cost of
FSIS auditing non-Federal laboratories,
conducting periodic proficiency test
sample studies, conducting on-site
reviews, and maintaining accreditation
(includes analyzing proficiency test
results and documentation).
FSIS explained that the costs to the
ALP can be reduced when laboratories
apply for multiple accreditations,
because most of the cost to the Agency
in conducting the ALP is in travel and
administering sample studies to
determine laboratory proficiency.
Therefore, as proposed, FSIS is
amending the regulations to include a
sliding scale for accreditations and the
maintenance of accreditations after
payment of the base fee of $5,000 for the
first accreditation that a laboratory
receives. Under the final rule, FSIS will
charge laboratories $5,000 per year for
the first analyte class accreditation or
maintenance of accreditation, $2,900
per year for the second, and $2,100 per
year for each additional analyte class
accreditation or maintenance of
accreditation.
As FSIS proposed, the final rule
includes a fee of $2,900 1 for the second
accreditation because FSIS staff can
review multiple accreditations (different
analyte classes) for the same laboratory
in one trip. Under the final rule, FSIS
will charge $2,100 2 each for the third,
fourth, fifth, and sixth accreditations,
because, when a laboratory has three or
more accreditations, some of the
instrument types and chemical
processes are similar from analysis to
analysis. This fact means that the review
will be less labor-intensive. FSIS
determined that costs to participants in
the accredited laboratory program will
cover the cost to the Agency for the
administration of the program. The costs
are included below in Table 1 and are
based on available FSIS laboratory and
personnel cost data.
TABLE 1—ALP FEE SCHEDULE
Accreditations
Item
1
2
3–6
$2,546
1,237
918
347
$816
1,237
536
347
$408
1,237
153
347
Total ..................................................................................................................................................
5,048
2,936
2,145
Rounded Total ..................................................................................................................................
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Auditing of non-Federal Laboratories ......................................................................................................
Proficiency Tests .....................................................................................................................................
Maintenance of Accreditation ..................................................................................................................
Additional Costs .......................................................................................................................................
5,000
2,900
2,100
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
1 Source: FSIS, OPHS, LQAS, Accredited
Laboratory Program.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Sep 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This final
rule has been designated a ‘‘nonsignificant’’ regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order (E.O.)
12866. Accordingly, the rule has not
2 Ibid.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
19SER1
56237
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget under E.O.
12866.
Baseline
Currently, the annual fee is $5,000 per
accreditation (Table 2). As discussed
above, FSIS is reducing the fees after the
first accreditation. Table 2 below
compares current fees to proposed fees.
The FSIS Accredited Laboratory
Program, (ALP) is voluntary and charges
a non-refundable accreditation fee.
TABLE 2—CURRENT AND PROPOSED ACCREDITATION FEE SCHEDULE
Current
accreditation
lab fee
Accreditation
First ..................................................................................................................................................................
Second .............................................................................................................................................................
Third–Sixth .......................................................................................................................................................
Currently, there are 53 laboratories
accredited for 60 activities.3 Most (42
out of 53) laboratories are accredited for
food chemistry. There are 13
laboratories accredited for CHCs and
five laboratories for PCBs. Only five of
the 53 laboratories are accredited for
more than one analyte. These
laboratories are accredited for 2–3
analytes. The analysis below assumes
laboratories will keep the same number
of accreditations under the new fee
structure.
New
accreditation
lab fee
$5,000
5,000
5,000
$5,000
2,900
2,100
Expected Cost of the Final Rule
For the purposes of this analysis, FSIS
considered the pre- and post-rule cost to
the industry; they are shown in Table 3
below. The cost to the industry will fall
from $300,000 per year to $283,700 per
year.
TABLE 3—ANNUAL COSTS PRE- AND POST-RULE
Pre-rule
Number of
analyte
classes
Number
labs
1 .......................................................................................................................................
2 .......................................................................................................................................
3 .......................................................................................................................................
Post-rule
Industry
cost
Number
labs
Industry
cost
cost is a result of leveraging efficiencies
in the current accreditation process that
will allow the industry to realize cost
savings if they increase the number of
accreditations. Under the current
accreditation fee schedule, the total
industry cost is estimated as $300,000
($300,000 = 60 Accreditations × $5,000)
(Table 3). Therefore, the total industry
$240,000
4 30,000
30,000
48
3
2
$240,000
5 23,700
20,000
53
Expected Benefits of the Final Rule
The benefit accrued to the industry is
equivalent to current accreditation costs
minus the new accreditation costs
which incorporate the efficiencies
outlined in the preamble.
The final rule will benefit the lab
industry by offering a sliding
accreditation fee schedule. The lower
48
3
2
300,000
53
283,700
cost is $283,700, a net benefit of $16,300
($300,000 ¥ $283,700 = $16,300). If the
total number of accreditations remains
unchanged, the present value of total
industry net benefit due to the final rule
(Table 4), adjusted with 3% inflation
rate for 10 years is $139,000, resulting
in an annualized expected benefit of
$16,295.
TABLE 4—SUMMARY OF COSTS AND BENEFITS
Current
costs
(FY13)
Proposed
costs
(FY14)
Proposed
benefits
Net Benefits
(10 years, 3%)
$300,000
$283,700
$16,300
$139,000
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The FSIS Administrator certifies that,
for the purposes of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the
final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
3 FSIS, OPHS, LQAS, Accredited Laboratory
Program.
4 Calculation—Total Cost = (Accreditation 1 Cost
* Number of Laboratories) + (Accreditation 2 Cost
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Sep 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
number of small entities in the United
States.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any new
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements that are subject to the
Office of Management and Budget
* Number of Laboratories) = ($5,000 * 3) + ($5,000
* 3).
5 Calculation—Total Cost = (Accreditation 1 Cost
* Number of Laboratories) + (Accreditation 2 Cost
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(OMB) approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.)
E-Government Act
FSIS and USDA are committed to
achieving the purposes of the EGovernment Act (44 U.S.C. 3601, et
* Number of Laboratories) = ($5,000 * 3) + ($2,900
* 3).
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
19SER1
56238
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 182 / Friday, September 19, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
seq.) by, among other things, promoting
the use of the Internet and other
information technologies and providing
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under this rule: (1) All
State and local laws and regulations that
are inconsistent with this rule will be
preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will
be given to this rule; and (3) no
retroactive proceedings will be required
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Executive Order 13175
This final rule has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation will not have substantial
and direct effects on Tribal governments
and will not have significant Tribal
implications.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Additional Public Notification
FSIS will announce this notice online
through the FSIS Web page located at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/
fsis/topics/regulations/federal-register.
FSIS will also make copies of this
Federal Register publication available
through the FSIS Constituent Update,
which is used to provide information
regarding FSIS policies, procedures,
regulations, Federal Register notices,
FSIS public meetings, and other types of
information that could affect or would
be of interest to constituents and
stakeholders. The Update is
communicated via Listserv, a free
electronic mail subscription service for
industry, trade groups, consumer
interest groups, health professionals,
and other individuals who have asked
to be included. The Update is also
available on the FSIS Web page. In
addition, FSIS offers an electronic mail
subscription service which provides
automatic and customized access to
selected food safety news and
information. This service is available at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/
fsis/programs-and-services/emailsubscription-service. Options range from
recalls to export information to
regulations, directives, and notices.
Customers can add or delete
subscriptions themselves, and have the
option to password protect their
accounts.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Sep 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
USDA Nondiscrimination Statement
No agency, officer, or employee of the
USDA shall, on the grounds of race,
color, national origin, religion, sex,
gender identity, sexual orientation,
disability, age, marital status, family/
parental status, income derived from a
public assistance program, or political
beliefs, exclude from participation in,
deny the benefits of, or subject to
discrimination any person in the United
States under any program or activity
conducted by the USDA.
Done at Washington, DC, on September 11,
2014.
Alfred Almanza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014–22208 Filed 9–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 51
[NRC–2012–0246]
How To File a Complaint of
Discrimination
RIN 3150–AJ20
To file a complaint of discrimination,
complete the USDA Program
Discrimination Complaint Form, which
may be accessed online at https://
www.ocio.usda.gov/sites/default/files/
docs/2012/
Complain_combined_6_8_12.pdf, or
write a letter signed by you or your
authorized representative. Send your
completed complaint form or letter to
USDA by mail, fax, or email:
Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture
Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–9410.
Fax: (202) 690–7442.
Email: program.intake@usda.gov.
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication
(Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.),
should contact USDA’s TARGET Center
at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD).
Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear
Fuel
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 391
Fees and charges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, FSIS amends 9 CFR Chapter
III as follows:
PART 391—FEES AND CHARGES FOR
INSPECTION AND LABORATORY
ACCREDITATION
1. The authority citation for part 391
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 138d, 7 U.S.C. 1622,
1627, and 2219a; 21 U.S.C. 451 et seq.; 21
U.S.C. 601–695.
2. Revise paragraph (a) of § 391.5 to
read as follows:
■
§ 391.5
Laboratory accreditation fee.
(a) The annual fee for the
accreditation and maintenance of
accreditation provided pursuant to
§ 439.5 of this chapter shall be $5,000
for the first analyte class, $2,900 for the
second analyte class, and $2,100 for
each additional analyte class.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is revising its
generic determination regarding the
environmental impacts of the continued
storage of spent nuclear fuel beyond a
reactor’s licensed life for operation and
prior to ultimate disposal. The NRC
prepared a final generic environmental
impact statement that provides a
regulatory basis for this final rule. The
Commission concludes that the generic
environmental impact statement
generically determines the
environmental impacts of continued
storage of spent nuclear fuel beyond the
licensed life for operation of a reactor.
The final rule also clarifies that the
generic determination applies to license
renewal for an independent spent fuel
storage installation (ISFSI), reactor
construction permits, and early site
permits. The final rule clarifies how the
generic determination will be used in
future NRC environmental reviews, and
makes changes to improve readability.
Finally, the final rule makes conforming
amendments to the determinations on
the environmental effects of renewing
the operating license of a nuclear power
plant to address issues related to the
onsite storage of spent nuclear fuel and
offsite radiological impacts of spent
nuclear fuel and high-level waste
disposal.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective on
October 20, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2012–0246 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information for this final rule. You may
access publicly-available information
related to this final rule by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
19SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56235-56238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22208]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 391
[Docket No. FSIS-2014-0026]
RIN 0583-AD
Change in Accredited Laboratory Fees
AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 56236]]
SUMMARY: The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is amending its
regulations to change the fees it charges for the accreditation and the
maintenance of accreditation of non-Federal laboratories for the FSIS
Accredited Lab Program (ALP). The fees in this final rule will be
applied on the effective date.
DATES: This final rule is effective November 18, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Williams, Room 6065, South
Agriculture Building, 1400 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20250-
0235, Phone: (202) 720-5627, Email: charles.williams@fsis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
FSIS has been delegated the authority to exercise the functions of
the Secretary of Agriculture (7 CFR 2.18, 2.53) as specified in the
Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA) (21 U.S.C. 601, et seq.) and the
Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA) (21 U.S.C. 451, et seq.). FSIS
protects the public by verifying that meat and poultry products are
wholesome, not adulterated, and properly marked, labeled, and packaged.
In addition, under the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade
Act of 1990, as amended (7 U.S.C. 138-138i), FSIS has authority to
accredit non-Federal laboratories. The accreditation allows non-Federal
laboratories to conduct analyses of official regulatory meat and
poultry samples. One provision (7 U.S.C. 138f) requires that a
laboratory seeking accreditation under the 1990 Act or under the FMIA
or PPIA pay a non-refundable accreditation fee to cover the costs of
the Accredited Laboratory Program.
Proposed and Final Rules
On April 21, 2014, FSIS published a proposed rule to amend 9 CFR
391.5(a) to change the fee structure for the accreditation and the
maintenance of the accreditation of laboratories for the FSIS
Accredited Laboratory Program (ALP) (79 FR 22052). FSIS did not receive
any comment on the proposed rule. Hence, it is adopting the proposed
rule in its entirety as its final rule.
FSIS explained in the proposed rule that under the regulations
currently in effect, FSIS charges each laboratory a flat annual fee of
$5,000 per accreditation or maintenance of accreditation. FSIS further
explained that a laboratory may apply for FSIS accreditation and
maintenance of accreditation in one to six analyte classes: Food
Chemistry, chlorinated hydrocarbons (CHCs), polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs), arsenic, nitrosamines, and sulfonamides. Under the regulations
currently in effect, FSIS charges laboratories the flat rate of $5,000
for each accreditation obtained regardless of the type or the number of
accreditations. A laboratory accredited for all six analyte classes is
charged a total fee of $30,000. FSIS bills annually for the costs of
the services it provides the laboratories, including the cost of FSIS
auditing non-Federal laboratories, conducting periodic proficiency test
sample studies, conducting on-site reviews, and maintaining
accreditation (includes analyzing proficiency test results and
documentation).
FSIS explained that the costs to the ALP can be reduced when
laboratories apply for multiple accreditations, because most of the
cost to the Agency in conducting the ALP is in travel and administering
sample studies to determine laboratory proficiency.
Therefore, as proposed, FSIS is amending the regulations to include
a sliding scale for accreditations and the maintenance of
accreditations after payment of the base fee of $5,000 for the first
accreditation that a laboratory receives. Under the final rule, FSIS
will charge laboratories $5,000 per year for the first analyte class
accreditation or maintenance of accreditation, $2,900 per year for the
second, and $2,100 per year for each additional analyte class
accreditation or maintenance of accreditation.
As FSIS proposed, the final rule includes a fee of $2,900 \1\ for
the second accreditation because FSIS staff can review multiple
accreditations (different analyte classes) for the same laboratory in
one trip. Under the final rule, FSIS will charge $2,100 \2\ each for
the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth accreditations, because, when a
laboratory has three or more accreditations, some of the instrument
types and chemical processes are similar from analysis to analysis.
This fact means that the review will be less labor-intensive. FSIS
determined that costs to participants in the accredited laboratory
program will cover the cost to the Agency for the administration of the
program. The costs are included below in Table 1 and are based on
available FSIS laboratory and personnel cost data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Source: FSIS, OPHS, LQAS, Accredited Laboratory Program.
\2\ Ibid.
Table 1--ALP Fee Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accreditations
Item --------------------------------------
1 2 3-6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auditing of non-Federal $2,546 $816 $408
Laboratories....................
Proficiency Tests................ 1,237 1,237 1,237
Maintenance of Accreditation..... 918 536 153
Additional Costs................. 347 347 347
--------------------------------------
Total........................ 5,048 2,936 2,145
--------------------------------------
Rounded Total................ 5,000 2,900 2,100
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This final rule has been designated a ``non-significant''
regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866.
Accordingly, the rule has not
[[Page 56237]]
been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under E.O. 12866.
Baseline
The FSIS Accredited Laboratory Program, (ALP) is voluntary and
charges a non-refundable accreditation fee. Currently, the annual fee
is $5,000 per accreditation (Table 2). As discussed above, FSIS is
reducing the fees after the first accreditation. Table 2 below compares
current fees to proposed fees.
Table 2--Current and Proposed Accreditation Fee Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current New
Accreditation accreditation accreditation
lab fee lab fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
First............................... $5,000 $5,000
Second.............................. 5,000 2,900
Third-Sixth......................... 5,000 2,100
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, there are 53 laboratories accredited for 60
activities.\3\ Most (42 out of 53) laboratories are accredited for food
chemistry. There are 13 laboratories accredited for CHCs and five
laboratories for PCBs. Only five of the 53 laboratories are accredited
for more than one analyte. These laboratories are accredited for 2-3
analytes. The analysis below assumes laboratories will keep the same
number of accreditations under the new fee structure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ FSIS, OPHS, LQAS, Accredited Laboratory Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expected Cost of the Final Rule
For the purposes of this analysis, FSIS considered the pre- and
post-rule cost to the industry; they are shown in Table 3 below. The
cost to the industry will fall from $300,000 per year to $283,700 per
year.
Table 3--Annual Costs Pre- and Post-Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-rule Post-rule
---------------------------------------------------
Number of analyte classes Industry Industry
Number labs cost Number labs cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1........................................................... 48 $240,000 48 $240,000
2........................................................... 3 \4\ 30,000 3 \5\ 23,700
3........................................................... 2 30,000 2 20,000
---------------------------------------------------
53 300,000 53 283,700
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expected Benefits of the Final Rule
The benefit accrued to the industry is equivalent to current
accreditation costs minus the new accreditation costs which incorporate
the efficiencies outlined in the preamble.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Calculation--Total Cost = (Accreditation 1 Cost * Number of
Laboratories) + (Accreditation 2 Cost * Number of Laboratories) =
($5,000 * 3) + ($5,000 * 3).
\5\ Calculation--Total Cost = (Accreditation 1 Cost * Number of
Laboratories) + (Accreditation 2 Cost * Number of Laboratories) =
($5,000 * 3) + ($2,900 * 3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final rule will benefit the lab industry by offering a sliding
accreditation fee schedule. The lower cost is a result of leveraging
efficiencies in the current accreditation process that will allow the
industry to realize cost savings if they increase the number of
accreditations. Under the current accreditation fee schedule, the total
industry cost is estimated as $300,000 ($300,000 = 60 Accreditations x
$5,000) (Table 3). Therefore, the total industry cost is $283,700, a
net benefit of $16,300 ($300,000 - $283,700 = $16,300). If the total
number of accreditations remains unchanged, the present value of total
industry net benefit due to the final rule (Table 4), adjusted with 3%
inflation rate for 10 years is $139,000, resulting in an annualized
expected benefit of $16,295.
Table 4--Summary of Costs and Benefits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current costs Proposed costs Proposed Net Benefits
(FY13) (FY14) benefits (10 years, 3%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
$300,000 $283,700 $16,300 $139,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The FSIS Administrator certifies that, for the purposes of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the final rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities in the United States.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any new information collection or
recordkeeping requirements that are subject to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
E-Government Act
FSIS and USDA are committed to achieving the purposes of the E-
Government Act (44 U.S.C. 3601, et
[[Page 56238]]
seq.) by, among other things, promoting the use of the Internet and
other information technologies and providing increased opportunities
for citizen access to Government information and services, and for
other purposes.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. Under this rule: (1) All State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with this rule will be preempted; (2)
no retroactive effect will be given to this rule; and (3) no
retroactive proceedings will be required before parties may file suit
in court challenging this rule.
Executive Order 13175
This final rule has been reviewed in accordance with the
requirements of Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments. The review reveals that this regulation
will not have substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and
will not have significant Tribal implications.
Additional Public Notification
FSIS will announce this notice online through the FSIS Web page
located at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/regulations/federal-register.
FSIS will also make copies of this Federal Register publication
available through the FSIS Constituent Update, which is used to provide
information regarding FSIS policies, procedures, regulations, Federal
Register notices, FSIS public meetings, and other types of information
that could affect or would be of interest to constituents and
stakeholders. The Update is communicated via Listserv, a free
electronic mail subscription service for industry, trade groups,
consumer interest groups, health professionals, and other individuals
who have asked to be included. The Update is also available on the FSIS
Web page. In addition, FSIS offers an electronic mail subscription
service which provides automatic and customized access to selected food
safety news and information. This service is available at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/programs-and-services/email-subscription-service. Options range from recalls to export information
to regulations, directives, and notices. Customers can add or delete
subscriptions themselves, and have the option to password protect their
accounts.
USDA Nondiscrimination Statement
No agency, officer, or employee of the USDA shall, on the grounds
of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual
orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status,
income derived from a public assistance program, or political beliefs,
exclude from participation in, deny the benefits of, or subject to
discrimination any person in the United States under any program or
activity conducted by the USDA.
How To File a Complaint of Discrimination
To file a complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program
Discrimination Complaint Form, which may be accessed online at https://
www.ocio.usda.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2012/
Complaincombined6812.pdf, or write
a letter signed by you or your authorized representative. Send your
completed complaint form or letter to USDA by mail, fax, or email:
Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture Director, Office of Adjudication,
1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410.
Fax: (202) 690-7442.
Email: program.intake@usda.gov.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for
communication (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.), should contact
USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 391
Fees and charges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, FSIS amends 9 CFR
Chapter III as follows:
PART 391--FEES AND CHARGES FOR INSPECTION AND LABORATORY
ACCREDITATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 391 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 138d, 7 U.S.C. 1622, 1627, and 2219a; 21
U.S.C. 451 et seq.; 21 U.S.C. 601-695.
0
2. Revise paragraph (a) of Sec. 391.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 391.5 Laboratory accreditation fee.
(a) The annual fee for the accreditation and maintenance of
accreditation provided pursuant to Sec. 439.5 of this chapter shall be
$5,000 for the first analyte class, $2,900 for the second analyte
class, and $2,100 for each additional analyte class.
* * * * *
Done at Washington, DC, on September 11, 2014.
Alfred Almanza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-22208 Filed 9-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P