Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft, Ltd. Airplanes, 56023-56025 [2014-22273]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 181 / Thursday, September 18, 2014 / Proposed Rules
d * * * The obligation date will be
the date of the request for reservation of
authority which is being processed in
the Finance Office. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 7, 2014.
Doug O’Brien,
Under Secretary, Rural Development.
Dated: September 3, 2014.
Michael Scuse,
Under Secretary, Farm and Foreign
Agricultural Services.
[FR Doc. 2014–21702 Filed 9–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0717; Directorate
Identifier 2014–CE–026–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Examining the AD Docket
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus
Aircraft, Ltd. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Models PC–6, PC–
6–H1, PC–6–H2, PC–6/350, PC–6/350–
H1, PC–6/350–H2, PC–6/A, PC–6/A–H1,
PC–6/A–H2, PC–6/B–H2, PC–6/B1–H2,
PC–6/B2–H2, PC–6/B2–H4, PC–6/C–H2,
and PC–6/C1–H2 airplanes that would
supersede AD 2013–11–08. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify
and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as a need to
incorporate new revisions into the
aircraft maintenance manual or in the
limitations document of the FAAapproved maintenance program. We are
issuing this proposed AD to require
actions to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 3, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Sep 17, 2014
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact PILATUS
AIRCRAFT LTD., Customer Liaison
Manager, CH–6371 STANS,
Switzerland; telephone: +41 (0) 41 619
65 80; fax: +41 (0) 41 619 65 76;
Internet: https://www.pilatusaircraft.com; email: fodermatt@pilatusaircraft.com. You may review copies of
the referenced service information at the
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (816) 329–
4148.
Jkt 232001
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
0717; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4059; fax: (816) 329–4090; email:
doug.rudolph@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2014–0717; Directorate Identifier
2014–CE–026–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56023
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On May 22, 2013, we issued AD
2013–11–08, Amendment 39–17468 (78
FR 37701; June 24, 2013). That AD
required actions intended to address an
unsafe condition on Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.
Models PC–6, PC–6–H1, PC–6–H2, PC–
6/350, PC–6/350–H1, PC–6/350–H2,
PC–6/A, PC–6/A–H1, PC–6/A–H2, PC–
6/B–H2, PC–6/B1–H2, PC–6/B2–H2,
PC–6/B2–H4, PC–6/C–H2, and PC–6/
C1–H2 airplanes and was based on
mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an
aviation authority of another country.
Since we issued AD 2013–11–08,
Amendment 39–17468 (78 FR 37701;
June 24, 2013), Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. has
issued revisions to the Limitations
section of the airplane maintenance
manual (AFM) to incorporate new life
limits for the fire extinguisher.
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued AD No. 2014–
0181, dated July 31, 2014 (referred to
after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
The maintenance instructions and
airworthiness limitations applicable to the
Structure and Components of PC–6
aeroplanes are specified in the Aircraft
Maintenance Manual (AMM) under Chapter
4 or in the Airworthiness Limitations
Document (ALS), depending on aeroplane
model.
The instructions contained in the ALS
document have been identified as mandatory
actions for continued airworthiness and
failure to comply with these instructions and
limitations could potentially lead to an
unsafe condition.
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus) recently
issued PC–6 AMM, Chapter 04–00–00,
Document Number 01975 issue 19 for PC–6
B2–H2 and PC–6 B2–H4 aeroplanes and PC–
6 ALS, Document Number 02334 issue 4 for
all other PC–6 aeroplane models to
incorporate new life limits for the Fire
Extinguisher.
For the reason described above, this AD
retains the requirements of EASA AD 2012–
0268, which is superseded, and requires
implementation of the new maintenance
requirements and/or airworthiness
limitations.
You may examine the MCAI on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2014–0717.
E:\FR\FM\18SEP1.SGM
18SEP1
56024
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 181 / Thursday, September 18, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Relevant Service Information
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. has issued
Airworthiness Limitations, document
No. 02334, dated May 31, 2014; and
Airworthiness Limitations, document
04–00–00, dated May 31, 2014. The
actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the
MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, they have notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
will affect 50 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 8 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD.
Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $34,000, or $680 per
product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions would take
about 1 work-hour and require parts
costing $1,000, for a cost of $1,085 per
product. We have no way of
determining the number of products
that may need these actions.
The only costs that would be imposed
by this proposed AD over that already
required by AD 2013–11–08 is 1 workhour to incorporate the new
airworthiness limitations section
sections into the maintenance program,
$1,085 for replacement of the fire
extinguisher if needed, and the addition
of 35 airplanes from 15 airplanes to 50
airplanes.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Sep 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Amend § 39.13 by removing
Amendment 39–17468 (78 FR 37701;
June 24, 2013), and adding the following
new AD:
■
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.: Docket No. FAA–
2014–0717; Directorate Identifier 2014–CE–
026–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by November
3, 2014.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2013–11–08,
Amendment 39–17468 (78 FR 37701; June
24, 2013).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.
Models PC–6, PC–6–H1, PC–6–H2, PC–6/350,
PC–6/350–H1, PC–6/350–H2, PC–6/A, PC–6/
A–H1, PC–6/A–H2, PC–6/B–H2, PC–6/B1–
H2, PC–6/B2–H2, PC–6/B2–H4, PC–6/C–H2,
and PC–6/C1–H2 airplanes, all manufacturer
serial numbers (MSN), including MSN 2001
through 2092 (see Note 1 of paragraph c),
certificated in any category.
Note 1 of paragraph (c): For MSN 2001–
2092, these airplanes are also identified as
Fairchild Republic Company PC–6 airplanes,
Fairchild Industries PC–6 airplanes,
Fairchild Heli Porter PC–6 airplanes, or
Fairchild-Hiller Corporation PC–6 airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 5: Time Limits.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI
describes the unsafe condition as a need to
incorporate new revisions into the aircraft
maintenance manual (AMM) or in the
Limitations document of the FAA-approved
maintenance program. The limitations were
revised to incorporate new life limits for the
fire extinguisher. These actions are required
to ensure the continued operational safety of
the affected airplanes.
(f) Actions and Compliance
(1) Actions retained from AD 2013–11–08,
Amendment 39–17468 (78 FR 37701; June 24,
2013) for all Models PC–6 airplanes: If the
flap actuator has accumulated 3,500 hours
time-in-service (TIS) or more since new or
last overhauled or 7 years or more since new
or last overhauled, whichever occurs first,
replacement of the flap actuator (except part
numbers 978.73.14.101 and 978.73.14.103) is
required within 350 hours TIS after July 29,
2013, 2013 (the effective date retained from
AD 2013–11–08) or 6 months after July 29,
2013, 2013 (the effective date retained from
AD 2013–11–08), whichever occurs first.
Flap actuators with less than 3,500 hours TIS
or 7 years since new or last overhauled are
covered by the airworthiness limitations
document (ALS) requirement.
(2) Actions new to this AD for all affected
Models PC–6/B2–H2 and PC–6/B2–H4
airplanes: Before further flight after the
effective date of this AD incorporate the
maintenance requirements as specified in
Chapter 04–00–00 of the AMM document
number 01975, issue 19, dated May 31, 2014,
of the Pilatus PC–6 Maintenance Manual;
into your FAA-accepted maintenance
program (maintenance manual).
(3) Actions new to this AD for all affected
Models PC–6 other than the Models PC–6/B2–
H2 and PC–6/B2–H4 airplanes: Before further
flight after the effective date of this AD
incorporate the maintenance requirements as
E:\FR\FM\18SEP1.SGM
18SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 181 / Thursday, September 18, 2014 / Proposed Rules
specified in ALS document number 02334,
issue 4, dated May 31, 2014, into your FAAaccepted maintenance program (maintenance
manual).
(4) Actions new to this AD for all airplanes:
(i) For airplanes with Halon Fire
Extinguishers that have not yet reached the
10 year life limit after the effective date of
this AD, when the Halon Fire Extinguisher
reaches its life limit of 10 years, before
further flight, replace with an airworthy
Halon Fire Extinguisher following Chapter
04–00–00 of the AMM, document number
01975, issue 19, dated May 31, 2014, of the
Pilatus PC–6 Maintenance Manual; or ALS
document number 02334, issue 4, dated May
31, 2014; as applicable.
(ii) For airplanes with Halon Fire
Extinguishers that have reached the 10 year
life limit on or before the effective date of
this AD, within the next 30 days after the
effective date of this AD or within the next
10 hours TIS after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs first, replace with an
airworthy Halon Fire Extinguisher following
Chapter 04–00–00 of the AMM, document
number 01975, issue 19, dated May 31, 2014,
of the Pilatus PC–6 Maintenance Manual; or
ALS document number 02334, issue 4, dated
May 31, 2014; as applicable.
(iii) Repetitively, after replacing the
airplanes Halon Fire Extinguisher as required
in paragraphs (f)(4)(i) or (f)(4)(ii), within 10
years after each last replacement, replace
with an airworthy Halon Fire Extinguisher.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4059; fax: (816) 329–
4090; email: doug.rudolph@faa.gov. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(h) Related Information
Refer to European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD No.: 2014–0181, dated July 31,
2014, for related information. You may
examine the MCAI on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2041–0717. For
service information related to this AD,
contact PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD., Customer
Liaison Manager, CH–6371 STANS,
Switzerland; telephone: +41 (0) 41 619 65 80;
fax: +41 (0) 41 619 65 76; Internet: https://
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Sep 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
www.pilatus-aircraft.com; email: fodermatt@
pilatus-aircraft.com. You may review this
referenced service information at the FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (816) 329–4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
September 12, 2014.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–22273 Filed 9–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0561; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NE–12–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
plc Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Rolls-Royce plc (RR) RB211 Trent 768–
60, 772–60, and 772B–60 turbofan
engines. This proposed AD was
prompted by fractures of the highpressure/intermediate-pressure (HP/IP)
turbine support internal oil feed tube.
This proposed AD would require
inspection of the oil feed tube sealing
sleeve and removal of those oil feed
tube sealing sleeves that fail inspection.
We are proposing this AD to prevent
failure of the HP/IP turbine support
internal oil feed tube, which could
result in uncontained engine failure and
damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 17,
2014.
SUMMARY:
You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56025
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
0561; or in person at the Docket
Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wego Wang, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine
& Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: 781–238–7134; fax: 781–238–
7199; email: wego.wang@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2014–0561; Directorate Identifier
2014–NE–12–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA AD 2014–
0168, dated July 16, 2014 (referred to
hereinafter as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
There have been nine occurrences of high oil
consumption, caused by fracture of the High/
Intermediate Pressure (HP/IP) turbine
support internal oil feed tube Part Number
(P/N) FW45909.
The oil feed tube threaded end adaptor and
sealing sleeve P/N FW15003 are designed to
form a sliding joint which, if restrained, can
compress the oil feed tube during thermal
contraction of the turbine casing at the end
E:\FR\FM\18SEP1.SGM
18SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 181 (Thursday, September 18, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 56023-56025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22273]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2014-0717; Directorate Identifier 2014-CE-026-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft, Ltd. Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Models PC-6, PC-6-H1, PC-6-H2, PC-6/350, PC-6/
350-H1, PC-6/350-H2, PC-6/A, PC-6/A-H1, PC-6/A-H2, PC-6/B-H2, PC-6/B1-
H2, PC-6/B2-H2, PC-6/B2-H4, PC-6/C-H2, and PC-6/C1-H2 airplanes that
would supersede AD 2013-11-08. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as a need to incorporate new revisions into the aircraft
maintenance manual or in the limitations document of the FAA-approved
maintenance program. We are issuing this proposed AD to require actions
to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 3,
2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD., Customer Liaison Manager, CH-6371 STANS,
Switzerland; telephone: +41 (0) 41 619 65 80; fax: +41 (0) 41 619 65
76; Internet: https://www.pilatus-aircraft.com; email:
aircraft.com">fodermatt@pilatus-aircraft.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0717; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090; email:
doug.rudolph@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0717;
Directorate Identifier 2014-CE-026-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On May 22, 2013, we issued AD 2013-11-08, Amendment 39-17468 (78 FR
37701; June 24, 2013). That AD required actions intended to address an
unsafe condition on Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Models PC-6, PC-6-H1, PC-6-
H2, PC-6/350, PC-6/350-H1, PC-6/350-H2, PC-6/A, PC-6/A-H1, PC-6/A-H2,
PC-6/B-H2, PC-6/B1-H2, PC-6/B2-H2, PC-6/B2-H4, PC-6/C-H2, and PC-6/C1-
H2 airplanes and was based on mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country.
Since we issued AD 2013-11-08, Amendment 39-17468 (78 FR 37701;
June 24, 2013), Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. has issued revisions to the
Limitations section of the airplane maintenance manual (AFM) to
incorporate new life limits for the fire extinguisher.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued AD
No. 2014-0181, dated July 31, 2014 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:
The maintenance instructions and airworthiness limitations
applicable to the Structure and Components of PC-6 aeroplanes are
specified in the Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM) under Chapter 4
or in the Airworthiness Limitations Document (ALS), depending on
aeroplane model.
The instructions contained in the ALS document have been
identified as mandatory actions for continued airworthiness and
failure to comply with these instructions and limitations could
potentially lead to an unsafe condition.
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus) recently issued PC-6 AMM,
Chapter 04-00-00, Document Number 01975 issue 19 for PC-6 B2-H2 and
PC-6 B2-H4 aeroplanes and PC-6 ALS, Document Number 02334 issue 4
for all other PC-6 aeroplane models to incorporate new life limits
for the Fire Extinguisher.
For the reason described above, this AD retains the requirements
of EASA AD 2012-0268, which is superseded, and requires
implementation of the new maintenance requirements and/or
airworthiness limitations.
You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-0717.
[[Page 56024]]
Relevant Service Information
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. has issued Airworthiness Limitations,
document No. 02334, dated May 31, 2014; and Airworthiness Limitations,
document 04-00-00, dated May 31, 2014. The actions described in this
service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 50 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 8 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $34,000, or $680 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 1 work-hour and require parts costing $1,000, for a cost of
$1,085 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.
The only costs that would be imposed by this proposed AD over that
already required by AD 2013-11-08 is 1 work-hour to incorporate the new
airworthiness limitations section sections into the maintenance
program, $1,085 for replacement of the fire extinguisher if needed, and
the addition of 35 airplanes from 15 airplanes to 50 airplanes.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-17468 (78 FR 37701; June
24, 2013), and adding the following new AD:
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.: Docket No. FAA-2014-0717; Directorate
Identifier 2014-CE-026-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by November 3, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2013-11-08, Amendment 39-17468 (78 FR
37701; June 24, 2013).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Models PC-6, PC-6-H1,
PC-6-H2, PC-6/350, PC-6/350-H1, PC-6/350-H2, PC-6/A, PC-6/A-H1, PC-
6/A-H2, PC-6/B-H2, PC-6/B1-H2, PC-6/B2-H2, PC-6/B2-H4, PC-6/C-H2,
and PC-6/C1-H2 airplanes, all manufacturer serial numbers (MSN),
including MSN 2001 through 2092 (see Note 1 of paragraph c),
certificated in any category.
Note 1 of paragraph (c): For MSN 2001-2092, these airplanes are
also identified as Fairchild Republic Company PC-6 airplanes,
Fairchild Industries PC-6 airplanes, Fairchild Heli Porter PC-6
airplanes, or Fairchild-Hiller Corporation PC-6 airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 5: Time Limits.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as a need to
incorporate new revisions into the aircraft maintenance manual (AMM)
or in the Limitations document of the FAA-approved maintenance
program. The limitations were revised to incorporate new life limits
for the fire extinguisher. These actions are required to ensure the
continued operational safety of the affected airplanes.
(f) Actions and Compliance
(1) Actions retained from AD 2013-11-08, Amendment 39-17468 (78
FR 37701; June 24, 2013) for all Models PC-6 airplanes: If the flap
actuator has accumulated 3,500 hours time-in-service (TIS) or more
since new or last overhauled or 7 years or more since new or last
overhauled, whichever occurs first, replacement of the flap actuator
(except part numbers 978.73.14.101 and 978.73.14.103) is required
within 350 hours TIS after July 29, 2013, 2013 (the effective date
retained from AD 2013-11-08) or 6 months after July 29, 2013, 2013
(the effective date retained from AD 2013-11-08), whichever occurs
first. Flap actuators with less than 3,500 hours TIS or 7 years
since new or last overhauled are covered by the airworthiness
limitations document (ALS) requirement.
(2) Actions new to this AD for all affected Models PC-6/B2-H2
and PC-6/B2-H4 airplanes: Before further flight after the effective
date of this AD incorporate the maintenance requirements as
specified in Chapter 04-00-00 of the AMM document number 01975,
issue 19, dated May 31, 2014, of the Pilatus PC-6 Maintenance
Manual; into your FAA-accepted maintenance program (maintenance
manual).
(3) Actions new to this AD for all affected Models PC-6 other
than the Models PC-6/B2-H2 and PC-6/B2-H4 airplanes: Before further
flight after the effective date of this AD incorporate the
maintenance requirements as
[[Page 56025]]
specified in ALS document number 02334, issue 4, dated May 31, 2014,
into your FAA-accepted maintenance program (maintenance manual).
(4) Actions new to this AD for all airplanes:
(i) For airplanes with Halon Fire Extinguishers that have not
yet reached the 10 year life limit after the effective date of this
AD, when the Halon Fire Extinguisher reaches its life limit of 10
years, before further flight, replace with an airworthy Halon Fire
Extinguisher following Chapter 04-00-00 of the AMM, document number
01975, issue 19, dated May 31, 2014, of the Pilatus PC-6 Maintenance
Manual; or ALS document number 02334, issue 4, dated May 31, 2014;
as applicable.
(ii) For airplanes with Halon Fire Extinguishers that have
reached the 10 year life limit on or before the effective date of
this AD, within the next 30 days after the effective date of this AD
or within the next 10 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, replace with an airworthy Halon Fire
Extinguisher following Chapter 04-00-00 of the AMM, document number
01975, issue 19, dated May 31, 2014, of the Pilatus PC-6 Maintenance
Manual; or ALS document number 02334, issue 4, dated May 31, 2014;
as applicable.
(iii) Repetitively, after replacing the airplanes Halon Fire
Extinguisher as required in paragraphs (f)(4)(i) or (f)(4)(ii),
within 10 years after each last replacement, replace with an
airworthy Halon Fire Extinguisher.
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090; email:
doug.rudolph@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal
inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(h) Related Information
Refer to European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.: 2014-
0181, dated July 31, 2014, for related information. You may examine
the MCAI on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2041-0717. For service information
related to this AD, contact PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD., Customer Liaison
Manager, CH-6371 STANS, Switzerland; telephone: +41 (0) 41 619 65
80; fax: +41 (0) 41 619 65 76; Internet: https://www.pilatus-
aircraft.com; email: aircraft.com">fodermatt@pilatus-aircraft.com. You may review
this referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on September 12, 2014.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-22273 Filed 9-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P