Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Devices; Classification of Tryptase Test System, 56009-56011 [2014-22254]
Download as PDF
56009
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 181 / Thursday, September 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
SUPPLEMENT NO. 4 TO PART 744—ENTITY LIST—Continued
Entity
License
requirement
License
review policy
Federal
Register
citation
Veteran Avia LLC, a.k.a., the following
one alias:
—Veteran Airline.
Sharjah SAIF Zone, Sharjah, U.A.E.;
and Y2–307, Saif Zone, Sharjah
International Airport, P.O. Box
122598, Sharjah, U.A.E. (See also
addresses under Armenia, Greece,
India, Pakistan, and U.K.).
For all items subject to
the EAR. (See § 744.11
of the EAR).
Presumption of denial ......
79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE
NUMBER] 09/18/14.
Country
*
*
*
*
*
*
UNITED KINGDOM
*
*
*
*
*
*
Veteran Avia LLC, a.k.a., the following
one alias:
—Veteran Airline.
1 Beckett Place, South Hamptonshire,
London, U.K. (See also addresses
under Armenia, Greece, India, Pakistan, and U.A.E.).
*
*
Dated: September 15, 2014.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 866
[Docket No. FDA–2014–N–1251]
Medical Devices; Immunology and
Microbiology Devices; Classification of
Tryptase Test System
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is classifying
tryptase test system devices into class II
(special controls). The Agency is
classifying the device into class II
(special controls) because special
controls, in addition to general controls,
will provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness of the device.
DATES: This order is effective October
20, 2014. The classification was
applicable February 15, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Stafford, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Sep 17, 2014
*
I. Background
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
ACTION:
*
Presumption of denial ......
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5608, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–6184.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2014–22277 Filed 9–17–14; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
For all items subject to
the EAR. (See § 744.11
of the EAR).
Jkt 232001
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)), devices that were not in
commercial distribution before May 28,
1976 (the date of enactment of the
Medical Device Amendments of 1976),
generally referred to as postamendments
devices, are classified automatically by
statute into class III without any FDA
rulemaking process. These devices
remain in class III and require
premarket approval, unless and until
the device is classified or reclassified
into class I or II, or FDA issues an order
finding the device to be substantially
equivalent, in accordance with section
513(i) of the FD&C Act, to a predicate
device that does not require premarket
approval. The Agency determines
whether new devices are substantially
equivalent to predicate devices by
means of premarket notification
procedures in section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part
807 (21 CFR part 807) of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, as
amended by section 607 of the Food and
Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144),
provides two procedures by which a
person may request FDA to classify a
device under the criteria set forth in
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE
NUMBER] 09/18/14.
*
section 513(a)(1). Under the first
procedure, the person submits a
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act for a device that
has not previously been classified and,
within 30 days of receiving an order
classifying the device into class III
under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act,
the person requests a classification
under section 513(f)(2). Under the
second procedure, rather than first
submitting a premarket notification
under section 510(k) and then a request
for classification under the first
procedure, the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon
which to base a determination of
substantial equivalence and requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act. If the person submits a
request to classify the device under this
second procedure, FDA may decline to
undertake the classification request if
FDA identifies a legally marketed device
that could provide a reasonable basis for
review of substantial equivalence with
the device or if FDA determines that the
device submitted is not of ‘‘lowmoderate risk’’ or that general controls
would be inadequate to control the risks
and special controls to mitigate the risks
cannot be developed.
In response to a request to classify a
device under either procedure provided
by section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act,
FDA will classify the device by written
order within 120 days. This
classification will be the initial
classification of the device.
E:\FR\FM\18SER1.SGM
18SER1
56010
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 181 / Thursday, September 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, FDA issued an order on
January 3, 2012, classifying the
ImmunoCAP Tryptase into class III,
because it was not substantially
equivalent to a device that was
introduced or delivered for introduction
into interstate commerce for commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, or a
device which was subsequently
reclassified into class I or class II. On
January 12, 2013, Phadia U.S., Inc.
submitted a request for de novo
classification of the ImmunoCAP
Tryptase under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. The manufacturer
recommended that the device be
classified into class II.
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed the
request for de novo classification in
order to classify the device under the
criteria for classification set forth in
section 513(a)(1). FDA classifies devices
into class II if general controls by
themselves are insufficient to provide
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient
information to establish special controls
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the request,
FDA determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
believes these special controls, in
addition to general controls, will
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
The device is assigned the generic
name tryptase test system, and it is
identified as a device that aids in the
diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis. It is
intended for in vitro diagnostic use as
an aid in the clinical diagnosis of
patients with a suspicion of systemic
mastocytosis in conjunction with other
clinical and laboratory findings.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated with this type of
device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks in Table 1:
TABLE 1—IDENTIFIED RISKS TO HEALTH AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Identified risks to health
Mitigation measures
False negative result ..........................................
False positive result ...........................................
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Inappropriate use ...............................................
FDA believes that the measures set
forth in the special controls guideline
entitled ‘‘Class II Special Controls
Guideline: Tryptase Test System as an
Aid in the Diagnosis of Systemic
Mastocytosis’’ are necessary, in addition
to general controls, to mitigate the risks
to health described in table 1.
Therefore, on February 15, 2012, FDA
issued an order to the petitioner
classifying tryptase test system devices
into class II. FDA is codifying this
device type by adding § 866.5760.
Following the effective date of this
final classification order, any firm
submitting a 510(k) premarket
notification for this device type will
need to comply with the special
controls.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act
provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act if FDA determines that
premarket notification is not necessary
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
For this type of device, FDA has
determined that premarket notification
is necessary to provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device. Therefore, this type of
device is not exempt from premarket
notification requirements. Persons who
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Sep 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
Device description containing the information specified in the special control guideline.
Analytical performance validation.
Software.
Clinical performance evaluation.
Labeling.
Device description containing the information specified in the special control guideline.
Analytical performance validation.
Software.
Clinical performance evaluation.
Labeling.
Labeling.
intend to market this type of device
must submit to FDA a premarket
notification, prior to marketing the
device, which contains information
about the tryptase test system they
intend to market.
number 0910–0073; and the collections
of information in 21 CFR part 801 and
21 CFR 809.10 have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0485.
II. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
Biologics, Laboratories, Medical
devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 866 is
amended as follows:
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final administrative order
establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of
information found in other FDA
regulations. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collections of information in part 807,
subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 820 have
been approved under OMB control
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 866
PART 866—IMMUNOLOGY AND
MICROBIOLOGY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 866 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 371.
2. Add § 866.5760 to subpart F to read
as follows:
■
§ 866.5760
Tryptase test system.
(a) Identification. A tryptase test
system is a device that aids in the
diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis. It is
intended for in vitro diagnostic use as
an aid in the clinical diagnosis of
patients with a suspicion of systemic
mastocytosis in conjunction with other
clinical and laboratory findings.
E:\FR\FM\18SER1.SGM
18SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 181 / Thursday, September 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special control is FDA’s
guideline entitled ‘‘Class II Special
Controls Guideline: Tryptase Test
System as an Aid in the Diagnosis of
Systemic Mastocytosis.’’ For availability
of the document, see § 866.1(e).
Dated: September 12, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–22254 Filed 9–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Petty Officer Giacomo Terrizzi,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego, Coast Guard;
telephone 619–278–7656, email
d11marineeventssandiego@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Cheryl Collins, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Table of Acronyms
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 165
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
IJSBA International Jet Sports Boating
Association
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0610]
A. Regulatory History and Information
Coast Guard
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; International Jet Sports
Boating Association World Finals;
Lake Havasu City, AZ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
within the navigable waters of the
Colorado River in Lake Havasu, AZ in
support of the International Jet Sports
Boating Association (IJSBA) World
Finals. This safety zone is necessary to
ensure the safety of participants, crew,
spectators, participating vessels, and
other vessels and users of the waterway.
Unauthorized persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring within this safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port, or their designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 6:30
a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on October 4, 2014
through October 12, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket [USCG–
2014–0610]. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Sep 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
56011
6.04–6, and 160.5; Public Law 107–295,
116 Stat. 2064; and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1, which collectively authorize the
Coast Guard to propose, establish, and
define regulatory safety zones.
IJSBA is sponsoring the IJSBA World
Finals, which will involve
approximately 800 personal water craft,
5 to 13 feet in length. The safety zone
will encompass an area in the vicinity
of the Crazy Horse Campgrounds. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators, sponsor
vessels, other vessels, and users of the
waterway, specifically in minimizing
vessel wakes by transiting vessels in the
vicinity of the racing area. Unnecessary
wakes can disrupt the personal water
craft and could cause injury or damage
to the participants.
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule because an NPRM would be
impracticable. Logistical details did not
present the Coast Guard enough time to
draft, publish, and receive public
comment on an NPRM. As such, the
event would occur before the
rulemaking process was complete.
Immediate action is needed to help
protect the safety of the participants,
crew, spectators, and participating
vessels from other vessels during the
duration of this event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), for the same
reasons mentioned above, the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Any delay in the effective date
of this rule would be contrary to the
public interest, because immediate
action is necessary to protect the safety
of the participants from the dangers
associated with other vessels transiting
this area while the race occurs.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone that will be enforced from
6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on October 4,
2014 through October 12, 2014. The
effect of the temporary safety zone will
be to restrict navigation in the vicinity
of the race site until the conclusion of
the races. The limits of the safety zone
will encompass the waters of Lake
Havasu, AZ in the area of Crazy Horse
Campgrounds encompassed by the
following positions:
34°28.32′ N, 114°21.71′ W
34°28.43′ N, 114°21.81′ W
34°28.55′ N, 114°21.56′ W
34°28.49′ N, 114°21.33′ W
The safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of the crew,
spectators, participants, and other
vessels and users of the waterway.
Persons and vessels will be prohibited
from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
his designated representative, during
the proposed times. Before the effective
period, the Coast Guard will publish a
local notice to mariners (LNM). Also,
the event sponsor through Lake Havasu
City has extensively advertised the
marine event with the public.
B. Basis and Purpose
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
The legal basis and authorities for this
rule are found in 33 U.S.C. 1231, 46
U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1,
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
E:\FR\FM\18SER1.SGM
18SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 181 (Thursday, September 18, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56009-56011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22254]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 866
[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-1251]
Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Devices;
Classification of Tryptase Test System
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying tryptase
test system devices into class II (special controls). The Agency is
classifying the device into class II (special controls) because special
controls, in addition to general controls, will provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device.
DATES: This order is effective October 20, 2014. The classification was
applicable February 15, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Stafford, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5608, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-6184.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)), devices that were
not in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 (the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976), generally referred
to as postamendments devices, are classified automatically by statute
into class III without any FDA rulemaking process. These devices remain
in class III and require premarket approval, unless and until the
device is classified or reclassified into class I or II, or FDA issues
an order finding the device to be substantially equivalent, in
accordance with section 513(i) of the FD&C Act, to a predicate device
that does not require premarket approval. The Agency determines whether
new devices are substantially equivalent to predicate devices by means
of premarket notification procedures in section 510(k) of the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807) of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, as amended by section 607 of the
Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-
144), provides two procedures by which a person may request FDA to
classify a device under the criteria set forth in section 513(a)(1).
Under the first procedure, the person submits a premarket notification
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act for a device that has not
previously been classified and, within 30 days of receiving an order
classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of the
FD&C Act, the person requests a classification under section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a premarket
notification under section 510(k) and then a request for classification
under the first procedure, the person determines that there is no
legally marketed device upon which to base a determination of
substantial equivalence and requests a classification under section
513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. If the person submits a request to classify
the device under this second procedure, FDA may decline to undertake
the classification request if FDA identifies a legally marketed device
that could provide a reasonable basis for review of substantial
equivalence with the device or if FDA determines that the device
submitted is not of ``low-moderate risk'' or that general controls
would be inadequate to control the risks and special controls to
mitigate the risks cannot be developed.
In response to a request to classify a device under either
procedure provided by section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA will
classify the device by written order within 120 days. This
classification will be the initial classification of the device.
[[Page 56010]]
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, FDA issued an
order on January 3, 2012, classifying the ImmunoCAP Tryptase into class
III, because it was not substantially equivalent to a device that was
introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce for
commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, or a device which was
subsequently reclassified into class I or class II. On January 12,
2013, Phadia U.S., Inc. submitted a request for de novo classification
of the ImmunoCAP Tryptase under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. The
manufacturer recommended that the device be classified into class II.
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed
the request for de novo classification in order to classify the device
under the criteria for classification set forth in section 513(a)(1).
FDA classifies devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device for its intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the request, FDA determined that the device
can be classified into class II with the establishment of special
controls. FDA believes these special controls, in addition to general
controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device.
The device is assigned the generic name tryptase test system, and
it is identified as a device that aids in the diagnosis of systemic
mastocytosis. It is intended for in vitro diagnostic use as an aid in
the clinical diagnosis of patients with a suspicion of systemic
mastocytosis in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory
findings.
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated with
this type of device and the measures required to mitigate these risks
in Table 1:
Table 1--Identified Risks to Health and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks to health Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
False negative result................ Device description containing the
information specified in the
special control guideline.
Analytical performance
validation.
Software.
Clinical performance evaluation.
Labeling.
False positive result................ Device description containing the
information specified in the
special control guideline.
Analytical performance
validation.
Software.
Clinical performance evaluation.
Labeling.
Inappropriate use.................... Labeling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA believes that the measures set forth in the special controls
guideline entitled ``Class II Special Controls Guideline: Tryptase Test
System as an Aid in the Diagnosis of Systemic Mastocytosis'' are
necessary, in addition to general controls, to mitigate the risks to
health described in table 1.
Therefore, on February 15, 2012, FDA issued an order to the
petitioner classifying tryptase test system devices into class II. FDA
is codifying this device type by adding Sec. 866.5760.
Following the effective date of this final classification order,
any firm submitting a 510(k) premarket notification for this device
type will need to comply with the special controls.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification requirements under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act if FDA determines that premarket notification is
not necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. For this type of device, FDA has
determined that premarket notification is necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, this type of device is not exempt from premarket
notification requirements. Persons who intend to market this type of
device must submit to FDA a premarket notification, prior to marketing
the device, which contains information about the tryptase test system
they intend to market.
II. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final administrative order establishes special controls that
refer to previously approved collections of information found in other
FDA regulations. These collections of information are subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of
information in part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket notification
submissions have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0120; the
collections of information in 21 CFR part 820 have been approved under
OMB control number 0910-0073; and the collections of information in 21
CFR part 801 and 21 CFR 809.10 have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 866
Biologics, Laboratories, Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
866 is amended as follows:
PART 866--IMMUNOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 866 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 866.5760 to subpart F to read as follows:
Sec. 866.5760 Tryptase test system.
(a) Identification. A tryptase test system is a device that aids in
the diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis. It is intended for in vitro
diagnostic use as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of patients with a
suspicion of systemic mastocytosis in conjunction with other clinical
and laboratory findings.
[[Page 56011]]
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
control is FDA's guideline entitled ``Class II Special Controls
Guideline: Tryptase Test System as an Aid in the Diagnosis of Systemic
Mastocytosis.'' For availability of the document, see Sec. 866.1(e).
Dated: September 12, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-22254 Filed 9-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P