Request for Information (RFI)-National Privacy Research Strategy, 56091-56093 [2014-22239]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 181 / Thursday, September 18, 2014 / Notices
visits will allow for improved law
enforcement oversight and compliance.
In addition to monitoring atoll species,
a remote camera system will also
provide better management and
documentation of any unauthorized
entry to the Refuge. The Refuge will
remain closed to the general public,
with entry only allowed via special use
permit.
Refuge staff will provide outreach and
interpretation opportunities and
develop an environmental education
program focusing on ‘‘bringing the
refuge to the people.’’ Appropriate
cultural practices will also be facilitated
through expanding refuge management
activities related to cultural resources.
We will work with the American Samoa
Historical Preservation Office and other
partners to conduct archaeological
surveys at Rose Atoll NWR, integrate
cultural resources into interpretation,
and increase dialogue with the Office of
Samoan Affairs and local villagers,
among other activities.
Public Availability of Documents
In addition to any methods in
ADDRESSES, you can view or obtain
documents at the Feleti Barstow Public
Library, National Park Office in Ofu, the
High School in Ta’u and other places of
public access in American Samoa.
Dated: July 30, 2014.
Stephen J. Zylstra,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Region,
Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2014–21667 Filed 9–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), and as part
of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden, the
National Science Foundation (NSF) is
inviting the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on this
proposed continuing information
collection. This is the second notice for
public comment; the first was published
in the Federal Register at 79 FR 26779
and no comments were received. NSF is
forwarding the proposed submission to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for clearance simultaneously
with the publication of this second
notice. The full submission may be
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
found at: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAMain.
DATES: Comments regarding these
information collections are best assured
of having their full effect if received by
OMB within 30 days of publication in
the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding (a) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of NSF,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
NSF’s estimate of burden including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; or (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology should be
addressed to: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for National Science
Foundation, 725—17th Street, NW.
Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503,
and to Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports
Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Suite 1265, Arlington, Virginia 22230 or
send email to splimpto@nsf.gov. Copies
of the submission may be obtained by
calling (703) 292–7556.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne H. Plimpton, NSF Reports
Clearance Officer at (703) 292–7556 or
send email to splimpto@nsf.gov.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339, which is accessible 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year
(including Federal holidays).
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: Graduate Research
Fellowship Application.
OMB Control No.: 3145–0023.
Abstract: Section 10 of the National
Science Foundation Act of 1950 (42
U.S.C. 1861 et seq.), as amended, states
that ‘‘The Foundation is authorized to
award, within the limits of funds made
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56091
available . . . scholarships and graduate
fellowships for scientific study or
scientific work in the mathematical,
physical, biological, engineering, social,
and other sciences at accredited U.S.
institutions selected by the recipient of
such aid, for stated periods of time.’’
The Graduate Research Fellowship
Program has two goals:
• To select, recognize, and financially
support individuals early in their
careers with the demonstrated potential
to be high achieving scientists and
engineers;
• To broaden participation in science
and engineering of underrepresented
groups, including women, minorities,
persons with disabilities, and veterans.
The list of GRFP Fellows sponsored
by the Foundation may be found via
FastLane through the NSF Web site:
https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov. The GRF
Program is described in the Solicitation
available at: https://www.nsf.gov/
publications/pub_summ.jsp?WT.z_
pims_id=6201&ods_key=nsf14590.
Estimate of Burden: This is an annual
application program providing three
years of support to individuals, usable
over a five-year fellowship period. The
application deadline is in early
November. It is estimated that each
submission is averaged to be 16 hours
per respondent, which includes three
references (on average) for each
application. It is estimated that it takes
two hours per reference for each
applicant.
Respondents: Individuals.
Estimated Number of Responses:
15,000.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 240,000 hours.
Frequency of Responses: Annually.
Dated: September 12, 2014.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2014–22241 Filed 9–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Request for Information (RFI)—
National Privacy Research Strategy
The National Coordination
Office (NCO) for Networking and
Information Technology Research and
Development (NITRD).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tomas Vagoun at vagoun@nitrd.gov or
(703) 292–4873.
DATES: To be considered, submissions
must be received no later than October
17, 2014.
E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM
18SEN1
56092
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 181 / Thursday, September 18, 2014 / Notices
Agencies of the Federal
Networking and Information
Technology Research and Development
(NITRD) Program are planning to
develop a joint National Privacy
Research Strategy. On behalf of the
agencies, the Cyber Security and
Information Assurance Research and
Development Senior Steering Group
seeks public input on the vital privacy
objectives that should be considered for
the goals of the strategy. The National
Privacy Research Strategy will be used
to guide federally-funded privacy
research and provide a framework for
coordinating research and development
in privacy-enhancing technologies.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Background
Life in the 21st century is inextricably
interconnected with cyberspace and
information systems. The computing
revolution is enabling advances in many
sectors of the economy, but at the same
time our social realm has been
profoundly affected by the rise of the
Internet. Privacy in the digital era is
challenged by our capabilities to store
and process vast quantities of
information. On the one hand, largescale data analytics is indispensable to
progress in science and engineering, but
on the other hand, when information
about us and our activities in
cyberspace can be tracked and
repurposed without our understanding,
opportunities for crime, discrimination,
and misuse are created.
Respect for privacy is a cornerstone
principle of our democracy. A variety of
laws and policies guide collection and
use of data by the government,
corporations, and organizations.
However, because technology advances
can outpace law, respect for privacy
must be a guiding principle in the
technological domain and our
information systems must be designed
to provide the means for protecting
privacy.
Privacy harms to individuals can arise
from actions taken with personal
information, including from
unapproved disclosure of personal
information, to tracking and profiling of
our actions, preferences, and habits in
cyberspace, to analytical inferences
from unrelated data sources. Protection
of privacy in this context will require
the development of both specific
technologies targeted for particular use,
as well as foundational science and
engineering to develop the capabilities
to be able to analyze the situations in
the digital realm that might lead to
privacy harms, and respond with
actions and technologies to prevent or
mitigate them.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
The Federal Government already
plays an important role in protecting
certain aspects of privacy, as directed by
various legislation (e.g., HIPAA,
COPPA), and this Administration has
further championed a number of
initiatives (such as the ‘‘Consumer
Privacy Bill of Rights’’ proposal) to
improve the state of privacy. In the
technical domain, Federal agencies
already fund research aimed at a wide
range of privacy aspects, from basic
research to specific technologies (see [1]
for a summary of Federal research in
privacy). Nevertheless, privacy in the
digital age is a topic of national (and
global) importance and more needs to be
done. Many challenges remain in areas
such as privacy-preserving solutions for
data integration and data mining,
methods and solutions for managing
privacy in electronic health information
systems, usage-based controls on
privacy and techniques to express user
preferences related to data use, or
methods for quantifying risks and harms
to privacy of individuals. Furthermore,
new technologies such as wearable
computing (e.g., glasses with cameras,
biomedical sensors), embedded
computing (e.g., Internet of Things), or
cyber-physical systems (e.g., the Smart
Grid) create new contexts in which
privacy can be challenged and that
require targeted technologies to support
personal privacy.
Objectives
Reports by the White House and the
President’s Council of Advisors on
Science and Technology (PCAST) on big
data and privacy [2] and [3], and reports
on Federal networking and information
technology research [4] and [5], call for
serious increases in investments for
research and development (R&D) in
privacy-enhancing technologies and in
encouraging multi-disciplinary research
involving computer science, social
science, and legal disciplines. The
White House and PCAST cite challenges
to personal privacy in the digital era as
a significant impairment that is
undermining societal benefits from
large-scale deployments of networking
and IT systems.
At the request of the White House
Office of Science and Technology Policy
(OSTP), the Cyber Security and
Information Assurance Research and
Development Senior Steering Group
(CSIA R&D SSG) of the Federal
Networking and Information
Technology Research and Development
(NITRD) Program [6] will lead the
development of a National Privacy
Research Strategy (NPRS). The NPRS
will establish objectives and
prioritization guidance for federally-
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
funded privacy research, provide a
framework for coordinating R&D in
privacy-enhancing technologies, and
encourage multi-disciplinary research
that recognizes the responsibilities of
the Government, the needs of society,
and enhances opportunities for
innovation in the digital realm. The
NPRS will be a catalyst to concentrate
Federal research resources against
critical privacy challenges and to
provide enduring objectives for research
in privacy-enhancing technologies. The
strategy will be developed by
interagency collaboration and in a
partnership with commercial and
academic sector stakeholders and
citizens interested in addressing the
privacy needs of the nation.
The CSIA R&D SSG is issuing this
Request for Information (RFI) to solicit
input from the public on defining the
most important goals for privacy in the
digital world. As a strategy, the NPRS
must focus research activities toward
relevant and impactful objectives, and
this RFI seeks to inform our
understanding of societal needs where
privacy-enhancing technologies would
be beneficial. While there are social and
legal solutions to many digital privacy
issues, they are out of scope for the
NPRS; our focus will be on the research
directions for privacy-enhancing
technologies, designs, and methods to
enable privacy-preserving information
systems. The submissions received
under this RFI will be used as inputs in
structuring the strategy.
Request
Through the NPRS, the CSIA R&D
SSG seeks to establish objectives for
research and a framework for organizing
ideas to achieve the research purpose.
Responders are asked to answer one or
more of the following questions:
1. Privacy objectives: Describe one or
more scenarios that illustrate a critical
issue concerning privacy; describe what
privacy problems arise in the scenario;
describe why it is important to
overcome the identified problems;
describe the needed privacy and what
capabilities are required to achieve it;
and describe what barriers exist to
achieving the needed privacy in the
scenario. The use of particular domains
in the scenario (e.g., healthcare,
education, social media) to describe the
desired privacy state is encouraged.
2. Assessment capabilities: Discuss
concepts, methods, and constructs
needed to assess privacy; discuss
capabilities and models that can:
Express privacy requirements, assess
and quantify risks/benefits to privacy,
evaluate effects of privacy risk
E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM
18SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 181 / Thursday, September 18, 2014 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
mitigation, and determine the
fulfillment of privacy requirements.
3. Multi-disciplinary approach:
Discuss how privacy challenges and
objectives might be framed to bring
many disciplines (e.g., computer
science, economics, social and
behavioral sciences, and law
disciplines) together to jointly and
collaboratively work to both strengthen
privacy and support innovation in
cyberspace and information systems;
discuss how diverse national/cultural
perspectives on privacy can be
accommodated.
4. Privacy architectures: (a) The Big
Data report [2] recommends adoption of
a ‘‘responsible use framework’’ [pg. 61]
that would provide greater focus on the
use of data and hold entities that utilize
data accountable for responsible use of
the data. Describe an architecture
implementing a ‘‘responsible use
framework’’ incorporating the three
questions above and taking into account
issues as: Encoding privacy policies in
machine-checkable forms and ensuring
their compliance and auditability;
managing the collection, retention, and
dissemination of sensitive data; and
ensuring the confidentiality and
integrity of sensitive data, while
enabling desired uses of them. (b)
Describe other privacy architectures that
would be effective for the design and
implementation of privacy-preserving
information systems. (c) Describe
technological advances that can change
privacy perceptions and how those
advances would be incorporated into
the ‘‘responsible use framework’’
architecture or other architectures
submitted for 4(b).
Submission Instructions
Page limitation: All submissions must
be 20 pages or less. Comments can be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
(a) Email: nprs@nitrd.gov.
(b) Fax: (703) 292–9097, Attn:
National Privacy Research Strategy.
(c) Mail: Attn: National Privacy
Research Strategy, NCO, Suite II–405,
4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA
22230.
Deadline for Submission under this
RFI is October 17, 2014.
Responses to this RFI may be posted
without change online, at https://
www.nitrd.gov. The CSIA R&D SSG
therefore requests that no business
proprietary information, copyrighted
information, or personally identifiable
information be submitted in response to
this RFI.
In accordance with FAR 15.202(3),
responses to this notice are not offers
and cannot be accepted by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Sep 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
Government to form a binding contract.
Responders are solely responsible for all
expenses associated with responding to
this RFI.
References
[1] ‘‘Report on Privacy Research within
NITRD,’’ April 2014, https://
www.nitrd.gov/Pubs/Report_on_Privacy_
Research_within_NITRD.pdf.
[2] ‘‘Big Data: Seizing Opportunities,
Preserving Values,’’ May 2014, https://
www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/
docs/big_data_privacy_report_may_1_
2014.pdf.
[3] ‘‘Big Data and Privacy: A Technological
Perspective,’’ May 2014, https://
www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/
microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_big_data_
and_privacy_-_may_2014.pdf.
[4] ‘‘Designing a Digital Future: Federally
Funded Research and Development in
Networking and Information
Technology,’’ January 2013, https://
www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/
microsites/ostp/pcast-nitrd2013.pdf.
[5] ‘‘Designing a Digital Future: Federally
Funded Research and Development in
Networking and Information
Technology,’’ December 2010, https://
www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/
microsites/ostp/pcast-nitrd-report2010.pdf.
[6] Networking and Information Technology
Research and Development (NITRD)
Program provides a framework in which
many U.S. Government agencies come
together to coordinate networking and
information technology research and
development efforts. More information is
available at https://www.nitrd.gov.
Submitted by the National Science
Foundation for the National Coordination
Office (NCO) for Networking and Information
Technology Research and Development
(NITRD) on September 12, 2014.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2014–22239 Filed 9–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Public Meetings of the National
Science and Technology Council;
Committee on Technology; Nanoscale
Science, Engineering, and Technology
Subcommittee; National
Nanotechnology Coordination Office
ACTION:
Notice of Public Meetings.
The National Nanotechnology
Coordination Office (NNCO), on behalf
of the Nanoscale Science, Engineering,
and Technology (NSET) Subcommittee
of the Committee on Technology,
National Science and Technology
Council (NSTC) and in collaboration
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56093
with the European Commission, will
host meetings for the U.S.-EU
Communities of Research (CORs) on the
topic of environmental, health, and
safety issues related to nanomaterials
(nanoEHS) between the publication date
of this Notice and September 30, 2015.
The CORs are a platform for scientists
to develop a shared repertoire of
protocols and methods to overcome
research gaps and barriers. The cochairs for each COR will convene
meetings and set meeting agendas with
administrative support from the
European Commission and the NNCO.
DATES: The CORs will hold multiple
webinars and/or conference calls
between the publication date of this
Notice and September 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Teleconferences and web
meetings for the CORs will take place
periodically between the publication
date of this Notice and September 30,
2015. Meeting dates, call-in information,
and other COR updates will be posted
on the Community of Research page at
https://us-eu.org/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information regarding this Notice,
please contact Stacey Standridge at
National Nanotechnology Coordination
Office, by telephone (703–292–8103) or
email (sstandridge@nnco.nano.gov).
Additional information about the CORs
and their upcoming meetings is posted
at https://us-eu.org/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: There are
currently six CORs addressing
complementary themes:
• Exposure through Product Life,
with Material Characterization
• Ecotoxicity Testing and Predictive
Models, with Material Characterization
• Predictive Modeling for Human
Health, with Material Characterization
• Databases and Ontologies
• Risk Assessment
• Risk Management and Control
The CORs directly address Objectives
4.1.4 (‘‘Participate in international
efforts, particularly those aimed at
generating [nanoEHS] best practices’’)
and 4.2.3 (‘‘Participate in coordinated
international efforts focused on sharing
data, guidance, and best practices for
environmental and human risk
assessment and management’’) of the
2014 National Nanotechnology Initiative
Strategic Plan. However, the CORs are
not envisioned to provide any
government agency with advice or
recommendations.
Registration: Individuals wishing to
participate in any of the CORs should
send the participant’s name, affiliation,
and country of residence to
sstandridge@nnco.nano.gov or mail the
information to Stacey Standridge, 4201
E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM
18SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 181 (Thursday, September 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56091-56093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22239]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Request for Information (RFI)--National Privacy Research Strategy
AGENCY: The National Coordination Office (NCO) for Networking and
Information Technology Research and Development (NITRD).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tomas Vagoun at vagoun@nitrd.gov or
(703) 292-4873.
DATES: To be considered, submissions must be received no later than
October 17, 2014.
[[Page 56092]]
SUMMARY: Agencies of the Federal Networking and Information Technology
Research and Development (NITRD) Program are planning to develop a
joint National Privacy Research Strategy. On behalf of the agencies,
the Cyber Security and Information Assurance Research and Development
Senior Steering Group seeks public input on the vital privacy
objectives that should be considered for the goals of the strategy. The
National Privacy Research Strategy will be used to guide federally-
funded privacy research and provide a framework for coordinating
research and development in privacy-enhancing technologies.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Life in the 21st century is inextricably interconnected with
cyberspace and information systems. The computing revolution is
enabling advances in many sectors of the economy, but at the same time
our social realm has been profoundly affected by the rise of the
Internet. Privacy in the digital era is challenged by our capabilities
to store and process vast quantities of information. On the one hand,
large-scale data analytics is indispensable to progress in science and
engineering, but on the other hand, when information about us and our
activities in cyberspace can be tracked and repurposed without our
understanding, opportunities for crime, discrimination, and misuse are
created.
Respect for privacy is a cornerstone principle of our democracy. A
variety of laws and policies guide collection and use of data by the
government, corporations, and organizations. However, because
technology advances can outpace law, respect for privacy must be a
guiding principle in the technological domain and our information
systems must be designed to provide the means for protecting privacy.
Privacy harms to individuals can arise from actions taken with
personal information, including from unapproved disclosure of personal
information, to tracking and profiling of our actions, preferences, and
habits in cyberspace, to analytical inferences from unrelated data
sources. Protection of privacy in this context will require the
development of both specific technologies targeted for particular use,
as well as foundational science and engineering to develop the
capabilities to be able to analyze the situations in the digital realm
that might lead to privacy harms, and respond with actions and
technologies to prevent or mitigate them.
The Federal Government already plays an important role in
protecting certain aspects of privacy, as directed by various
legislation (e.g., HIPAA, COPPA), and this Administration has further
championed a number of initiatives (such as the ``Consumer Privacy Bill
of Rights'' proposal) to improve the state of privacy. In the technical
domain, Federal agencies already fund research aimed at a wide range of
privacy aspects, from basic research to specific technologies (see [1]
for a summary of Federal research in privacy). Nevertheless, privacy in
the digital age is a topic of national (and global) importance and more
needs to be done. Many challenges remain in areas such as privacy-
preserving solutions for data integration and data mining, methods and
solutions for managing privacy in electronic health information
systems, usage-based controls on privacy and techniques to express user
preferences related to data use, or methods for quantifying risks and
harms to privacy of individuals. Furthermore, new technologies such as
wearable computing (e.g., glasses with cameras, biomedical sensors),
embedded computing (e.g., Internet of Things), or cyber-physical
systems (e.g., the Smart Grid) create new contexts in which privacy can
be challenged and that require targeted technologies to support
personal privacy.
Objectives
Reports by the White House and the President's Council of Advisors
on Science and Technology (PCAST) on big data and privacy [2] and [3],
and reports on Federal networking and information technology research
[4] and [5], call for serious increases in investments for research and
development (R&D) in privacy-enhancing technologies and in encouraging
multi-disciplinary research involving computer science, social science,
and legal disciplines. The White House and PCAST cite challenges to
personal privacy in the digital era as a significant impairment that is
undermining societal benefits from large-scale deployments of
networking and IT systems.
At the request of the White House Office of Science and Technology
Policy (OSTP), the Cyber Security and Information Assurance Research
and Development Senior Steering Group (CSIA R&D SSG) of the Federal
Networking and Information Technology Research and Development (NITRD)
Program [6] will lead the development of a National Privacy Research
Strategy (NPRS). The NPRS will establish objectives and prioritization
guidance for federally-funded privacy research, provide a framework for
coordinating R&D in privacy-enhancing technologies, and encourage
multi-disciplinary research that recognizes the responsibilities of the
Government, the needs of society, and enhances opportunities for
innovation in the digital realm. The NPRS will be a catalyst to
concentrate Federal research resources against critical privacy
challenges and to provide enduring objectives for research in privacy-
enhancing technologies. The strategy will be developed by interagency
collaboration and in a partnership with commercial and academic sector
stakeholders and citizens interested in addressing the privacy needs of
the nation.
The CSIA R&D SSG is issuing this Request for Information (RFI) to
solicit input from the public on defining the most important goals for
privacy in the digital world. As a strategy, the NPRS must focus
research activities toward relevant and impactful objectives, and this
RFI seeks to inform our understanding of societal needs where privacy-
enhancing technologies would be beneficial. While there are social and
legal solutions to many digital privacy issues, they are out of scope
for the NPRS; our focus will be on the research directions for privacy-
enhancing technologies, designs, and methods to enable privacy-
preserving information systems. The submissions received under this RFI
will be used as inputs in structuring the strategy.
Request
Through the NPRS, the CSIA R&D SSG seeks to establish objectives
for research and a framework for organizing ideas to achieve the
research purpose. Responders are asked to answer one or more of the
following questions:
1. Privacy objectives: Describe one or more scenarios that
illustrate a critical issue concerning privacy; describe what privacy
problems arise in the scenario; describe why it is important to
overcome the identified problems; describe the needed privacy and what
capabilities are required to achieve it; and describe what barriers
exist to achieving the needed privacy in the scenario. The use of
particular domains in the scenario (e.g., healthcare, education, social
media) to describe the desired privacy state is encouraged.
2. Assessment capabilities: Discuss concepts, methods, and
constructs needed to assess privacy; discuss capabilities and models
that can: Express privacy requirements, assess and quantify risks/
benefits to privacy, evaluate effects of privacy risk
[[Page 56093]]
mitigation, and determine the fulfillment of privacy requirements.
3. Multi-disciplinary approach: Discuss how privacy challenges and
objectives might be framed to bring many disciplines (e.g., computer
science, economics, social and behavioral sciences, and law
disciplines) together to jointly and collaboratively work to both
strengthen privacy and support innovation in cyberspace and information
systems; discuss how diverse national/cultural perspectives on privacy
can be accommodated.
4. Privacy architectures: (a) The Big Data report [2] recommends
adoption of a ``responsible use framework'' [pg. 61] that would provide
greater focus on the use of data and hold entities that utilize data
accountable for responsible use of the data. Describe an architecture
implementing a ``responsible use framework'' incorporating the three
questions above and taking into account issues as: Encoding privacy
policies in machine-checkable forms and ensuring their compliance and
auditability; managing the collection, retention, and dissemination of
sensitive data; and ensuring the confidentiality and integrity of
sensitive data, while enabling desired uses of them. (b) Describe other
privacy architectures that would be effective for the design and
implementation of privacy-preserving information systems. (c) Describe
technological advances that can change privacy perceptions and how
those advances would be incorporated into the ``responsible use
framework'' architecture or other architectures submitted for 4(b).
Submission Instructions
Page limitation: All submissions must be 20 pages or less. Comments
can be submitted by any of the following methods:
(a) Email: nprs@nitrd.gov.
(b) Fax: (703) 292-9097, Attn: National Privacy Research Strategy.
(c) Mail: Attn: National Privacy Research Strategy, NCO, Suite II-
405, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.
Deadline for Submission under this RFI is October 17, 2014.
Responses to this RFI may be posted without change online, at
https://www.nitrd.gov. The CSIA R&D SSG therefore requests that no
business proprietary information, copyrighted information, or
personally identifiable information be submitted in response to this
RFI.
In accordance with FAR 15.202(3), responses to this notice are not
offers and cannot be accepted by the Government to form a binding
contract. Responders are solely responsible for all expenses associated
with responding to this RFI.
References
[1] ``Report on Privacy Research within NITRD,'' April 2014, https://
www.nitrd.gov/Pubs/
ReportonPrivacyResearchwithin
NITRD.pdf.
[2] ``Big Data: Seizing Opportunities, Preserving Values,'' May
2014, https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/
bigdataprivacyreportmay1
2014.pdf.
[3] ``Big Data and Privacy: A Technological Perspective,'' May 2014,
https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/
pcastbigdataandprivacy-
may2014.pdf.
[4] ``Designing a Digital Future: Federally Funded Research and
Development in Networking and Information Technology,'' January
2013, https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-nitrd2013.pdf.
[5] ``Designing a Digital Future: Federally Funded Research and
Development in Networking and Information Technology,'' December
2010, https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-nitrd-report-2010.pdf.
[6] Networking and Information Technology Research and Development
(NITRD) Program provides a framework in which many U.S. Government
agencies come together to coordinate networking and information
technology research and development efforts. More information is
available at https://www.nitrd.gov.
Submitted by the National Science Foundation for the National
Coordination Office (NCO) for Networking and Information Technology
Research and Development (NITRD) on September 12, 2014.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2014-22239 Filed 9-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P