Modification of VOR Federal AirwayV-298 in the Vicinity of Pasco, WA, 55995-55997 [2014-22237]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 181 / Thursday, September 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
and recipient information to the provider has
requested a remittance transfer.
31(b)(2) Receipt
*
*
*
*
*
4. Web site of the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau. Section 1005.31(b)(2)(vi)
requires a remittance transfer provider to
disclose the name, toll-free telephone
number(s), and Web site of the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau. Providers may
satisfy this requirement by disclosing the
Web site of the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau’s homepage,
www.consumerfinance.gov, as shown on
Model Forms A–32, A–34, A–35, and A–39.
Alternatively, providers may, but are not
required to, disclose the Bureau’s Web site as
the address of a page on the Bureau’s Web
site that provides information for consumers
about remittance transfers, currently,
consumerfinance.gov/sending-money, as
shown on Model Form A–31. In addition,
providers making disclosures in a language
other than English pursuant to § 1005.31(g)
may, but are not required to, disclose the
Bureau’s Web site as a page on the Bureau’s
Web site that provides information for
consumers about remittance transfers in the
relevant language, if such Web site exists. For
example, a provider that is making
disclosures in Spanish under § 1005.31(g)
may, but is not required to, disclose the
Bureau’s Web site on Spanish-language
disclosures as the page on the Bureau’s Web
site that provides information regarding
remittance transfers in Spanish, currently
consumerfinance.gov/envios. This optional
disclosure is shown on Model A–40. The
Bureau will publish a list of any other foreign
language Web sites that provide information
regarding remittance transfers.
*
*
*
*
*
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
31(e) Timing
1. Request to send a remittance transfer.
Except as provided in § 1005.36(a), prepayment and combined disclosures are
required to be provided to the sender when
the sender requests the remittance transfer,
but prior to payment for the transfer.
Whether a consumer has requested a
remittance transfer depends on the facts and
circumstances. A sender that asks a provider
to send a remittance transfer, and provides
transaction-specific information to the
provider in order to send funds to a
designated recipient, has requested a
remittance transfer. A sender that has sent an
email, fax, mailed letter, or similar written or
electronic communication has not requested
a remittance transfer if the provider believes
that it is impractical for the provider to treat
that communication as a request and if the
provider treats the communication as an
inquiry and subsequently responds to that
inquiry by calling the consumer on a
telephone and orally gathering or confirming
the information needed to process a request
for a remittance transfer. See comment
31(a)(3)–2. Likewise, a consumer who solely
inquires about that day’s rates and fees to
send to Mexico has not requested the
provider to send a remittance transfer.
Conversely, a sender who asks the provider
at an agent location to send money to a
recipient in Mexico and provides the sender
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Sep 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
§ 1005.33(c)(2)(ii)(B) or (c)(2)(iii), as
applicable.
*
*
55995
*
*
*
*
Section 1005.33 Procedures for Resolving
Errors
33(a) Definition of Error
*
*
*
*
*
7. Failure to make funds available by
disclosed date of availability—fraud and
other screening procedures. Under
§ 1005.33(a)(1)(iv)(B), a remittance transfer
provider’s failure to deliver funds by the
disclosed date of availability is not an error
if such delay is related to the provider’s or
any third party’s investigation necessary to
address potentially suspicious, blocked or
prohibited activity, and the provider did not
and could not have reasonably foreseen the
delay so as to enable it to timely disclose an
accurate date of availability when providing
the sender with a receipt or combined
disclosure. For example, no error occurs if
delivery of funds is delayed because, after the
receipt is provided, the provider’s fraud
screening system flags a remittance transfer
because the designated recipient has a name
similar to the name of a blocked person
under a sanctions program and further
investigation is needed to determine that the
designated recipient is not actually a blocked
person. Similarly, no error occurs where,
after disclosing a date of availability to the
sender, a remittance transfer provider
receives specific law enforcement
information indicating that the
characteristics of a remittance transfer match
a pattern of fraudulent activity, and as a
result, the provider deems it necessary to
delay delivery of the funds to allow for
further investigation. However, if a delay
could have been reasonably foreseen, the
exception in § 1005.33(a)(1)(iv)(B) would not
apply. For example, if a provider knows in
time to make a disclosure that all remittance
transfers to a certain geographic area must
undergo screening procedures that routinely
delay such transfers by two days, the
provider’s failure to include the additional
two days in its disclosure of the date of
availability constitutes an error if delivery of
the funds is indeed delayed beyond the
disclosed date of availability.
*
*
*
*
*
33(c) Time Limits and Extent of Investigation
*
*
*
*
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 21, 2014.
Richard Cordray,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
[FR Doc. 2014–20681 Filed 9–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0369; Airspace
Docket No. 14–ANM–4]
RIN 2120–AA66
*
5. Amount appropriate to resolve the error.
For purposes of the remedies set forth in
§ 1005.33(c)(2)(i)(A), (c)(2)(i)(B),
(c)(2)(ii)(A)(1), and (c)(2)(i)(A)(2) the amount
appropriate to resolve the error is the specific
amount of transferred funds that should have
been received if the remittance transfer had
been effected without error. The amount
appropriate to resolve the error does not
include consequential damages. For example,
when the amount that was disclosed
pursuant to § 1005.31(b)(1)(vii) was received
by the designated recipient before the
provider must determine the appropriate
remedy for an error under § 1005.33(a)(1)(iv),
no additional amounts are required to resolve
the error after the remittance transfer
provider refunds the appropriate fees and
taxes paid by the sender pursuant to
PO 00000
*
12. * * *
i. A sender instructs a remittance transfer
provider to send US$100 to a designated
recipient in local currency, for which the
provider charges a transfer fee of US$10 (and
thus the sender pays the provider $110). The
provider’s correspondent imposes a fee of
US$15 that it deducts from the amount of the
transfer. The sender provides incorrect or
insufficient information that results in nondelivery of the remittance transfer as
requested. Once the provider determines that
an error occurred because the sender
provided incorrect or insufficient
information, the provider must provide the
report required by § 1005.33(c)(1) or (d)(1)
and inform the sender, pursuant to
§ 1005.33(c)(1) or (d)(1), that it will refund
US$95 to the sender within three business
days, unless the sender chooses to apply the
US$95 towards a new remittance transfer and
the provider agrees. Of the $95 that is
refunded to the sender, $10 reflects the
refund of the provider’s transfer fee, and $85
reflects the refund of the amount of funds
provided by the sender in connection with
the transfer which was not properly
transmitted. The provider is not required to
refund the US$15 fee imposed by the
correspondent (unless the $15 will be
refunded to the provider by the
correspondent).
Modification of VOR Federal Airway
V–298 in the Vicinity of Pasco, WA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action modifies VOR
Federal airway V–298 in the vicinity of
Pasco, WA. The FAA is taking this
action due to the Pasco, WA (PSC), VHF
Omnidirectional Range (VOR)/Distance
Measuring Equipment (DME) facility
that provides navigation aid (NAVAID)
guidance for a portion of V–298, being
relocated. This action will ensure the
safety and efficient management of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18SER1.SGM
18SER1
55996
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 181 / Thursday, September 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
aircraft operating within the National
Airspace System.
DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC,
November 13, 2014. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.9Y,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can
be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/
air_traffic/publications/. The Order is
also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federalregulations/ibr_locations.html.
FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on
September 15. For further information,
you can contact the Airspace Policy and
Regulations Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: 202–267–8783.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy and
Regulations Group, Office of Airspace
Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
The Tri-Cities Airport, located in
Pasco, WA, is the fourth largest air
carrier airport in Washington State. In
the past five years, the number of
enplanements at the airport has
increased by nearly 100,000 per year. To
accommodate this unprecedented
growth, the Port of Pasco is expanding
the Tri-Cities Airport terminal to nearly
double the size of the existing terminal.
However, the terminal expansion
project creates a proximity issue to one
of the taxiways on the airfield (taxiway
D) by aircraft that will push back from
the gates at the expanded terminal, as
well as encroaches into the PSC VOR
1,000 foot clear zone.
To resolve the terminal expansion
proximity issue with taxiway D,
approximately two thirds of the taxiway
is being relocated to the northeast, away
from the terminal, to establish a straight,
parallel taxiway to runways 12/30 for
the entire length of the taxiway. As a
result of the portion of taxiway D
effected by the terminal expansion being
relocated, the new taxiway will run
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Sep 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
through the PSC VOR/DME site. To
overcome the airport terminal
expansion encroaching on the PSC VOR
clear zone and, subsequently, the new
taxiway D being relocated through the
VOR/DME site, the NAVAID will be
moved north 0.44 nautical miles, away
from the airport terminal expansion and
the taxiway relocation. Moving the PSC
VOR/DME enables the NAVAID to be
retained and continue providing
ground-based navigation aid coverage
for the existing VOR Federal airway
segments it supports today.
Due to the PSC VOR/DME NAVAID
being relocated, VOR Federal airway V–
298 requires amendment action. The
FAA is modifying this airway by
changing the PSC VOR radial
information used to identify the
intersection point in the legal
description using corrected radial
information from the PSC VOR/DME in
its new location. Since this action
merely involves editorial changes in the
legal descriptions of VOR Federal
Airways, and does not involve a change
in the dimensions or operating
requirements of that airspace, notice
and public procedure under 5 U.S.C.
553(b) are unnecessary.
The Rule
The FAA is amending Title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71
to modify VOR Federal airway V–298.
The PSC VOR/DME relocation, due to
the Tri-Cities Airport terminal
expansion and taxiway D relocation
projects, has made this action necessary.
The route modification is outlined
below.
V–298: V–298 extends between the
Seattle, WA, VORTAC and Gillette, WY,
VOR. This action modifies the route
segment between the Yakima, WA,
VORTAC and the PSC VOR/DME by
changing the PSC radial used to
describe the intersection between the
two NAVAIDs from the Pasco 274°
radial to the Pasco 273° radial.
Additionally, this action removes
reference to a south alternate airway
designation previously deleted by
regulatory action published in the
Federal Register (48 FR 54829,
December 7, 1983).
The navigation aid radials cited in
this action are stated relative to True
north.
Domestic VOR Federal airways are
published in paragraph 6010(a) of FAA
Order 7400.9Y dated August 6, 2014,
and effective September 15, 2014, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The VOR Federal airway listed in
this document would be subsequently
published in the Order.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not
warrant preparation of a regulatory
evaluation as the anticipated impact is
so minimal. Since this is a routine
matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103. Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to
assign the use of the airspace necessary
to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority as
it modifies the route structure as
necessary to preserve the safe and
efficient flow of air traffic within the
NAS.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 311a. This airspace action is
not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
E:\FR\FM\18SER1.SGM
18SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 181 / Thursday, September 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Y,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 6, 2014 and
effective September 15, 2014, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6010(a)
Airways
*
*
*
Domestic VOR Federal
*
*
V–298 [Amended]
From Seattle, WA; INT Seattle 107° and
Yakima, WA, 331° radials; Yakima; INT
Yakima 129° and Pasco, WA, 273° radials;
Pasco; Pendleton, OR; 74 miles, 43 miles 115
MSL, 99 MSL Donnelly, ID; 41 miles 99 MSL,
89 miles 145 MSL, Dubois, ID; 68 miles 130
MSL, Dunoir, WY; 62 miles 135 MSL, Boysen
Reservoir, WY; 9 miles, 34 miles 105 MSL,
Muddy Mountain,WY; to Gillette, WY.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
11, 2014.
Ellen Crum,
Acting Manager, Airspace Policy and
Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2014–22237 Filed 9–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0274; Airspace
Docket No. 13–AGL–23]
RIN 2120–AA66
Modification and Revocation of Air
Traffic Service (ATS) Routes in the
Vicinity of Sandusky, OH
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action amends 5 VHF
Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal
airways (V–6, V–30, V–126, V–133, and
V–416) and removes 1 VOR Federal
airway (V–65) in the vicinity of
Sandusky, OH. The FAA is taking this
action due to the scheduled
decommissioning of the Sandusky, OH,
VOR/Distance Measuring Equipment
(VOR/DME) facility that provides
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Sep 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
navigation guidance for a portion of the
airways listed.
DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC,
November 13, 2014. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.9Y,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can
be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/
air_traffic/publications/. The Order is
also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federalregulations/ibr_locations.html.
FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on
September 15. For further information,
you can contact the Airspace Policy and
Regulations Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: 202–267–8783.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy and
Regulations Group, Office of Airspace
Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
The FAA published in the Federal
Register a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend VOR
Federal airways V–6, V–30, V–126, V133, and V–416, and remove VOR
Federal airway V–65 in the Sandusky,
OH, area (79 FR 34453, June 17, 2014).
Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the
proposal. No comments were received.
The Rule
The FAA is amending Title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71
by modifying VOR Federal airways V–
6, V–30, V–126, V–133, and V–416, and
removing VOR Federal airway V–65 in
the vicinity of Sandusky, OH. These
airway modifications are necessary due
to the Sandusky, OH, VOR/DME being
decommissioned and the remaining
ground-based navigation aid (NAVAID)
coverage in the area being insufficient to
enable the continuity of the affected
airways. The route modifications are
outlined below.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55997
V–6: V–6 extends from the Oakland,
CA, VOR Tactical Air Navigation
(VORTAC) to the DuPage, IL, VOR/
DME, and from the intersection of the
Chicago Heights, IL, VORTAC 358° and
Gipper, MI, VORTAC 271° radials
(NILES fix) to the La Guardia, NY, VOR/
DME. The route segment between the
Waterville, OH, VOR/DME and Dryer,
OH, VOR/DME is removed. Aircraft
flying between the Waterville, OH,
VOR/DME and Dryer, OH, VOR/DME
will be routed using other existing
adjacent airways.
V–30: V–30 extends from the Badger,
WI, VORTAC to the Solberg, NJ, VOR/
DME. The route segment between the
Waterville, OH, VOR/DME and Dryer,
OH, VOR/DME is removed. Aircraft
flying between the Waterville, OH,
VOR/DME and Dryer, OH, VOR/DME
will be routed using other existing
adjacent airways.
V–65: V–65 is removed.
V–126: V–126 extends from the
intersection of the Peotone, IL, VORTAC
053° and Knox, IN, VOR/DME 297°
radials (BEARZ fix) to the Stonyfork,
PA, VOR/DME. The route segment
between the Waterville, OH, VOR/DME
and Dryer, OH, VOR/DME is removed.
Aircraft flying between the Waterville,
OH, VOR/DME and Dryer, OH, VOR/
DME will be routed using other existing
adjacent airways.
V–133: V–133 extends from the
intersection of the Charlotte, NC, VOR/
DME 305° and Barretts Mountain, NC,
VOR/DME 197° radials (LINCO fix) to
the Red Lake, ON, Canada (YRL), VOR/
DME, excluding the airspace within
Canada. The route segment between the
Mansfield, OH, VORTAC and Salem,
MI, VORTAC is removed. Aircraft flying
between the Mansfield, OH, VORTAC
and Salem, MI, VORTAC will be routed
using other existing adjacent airways.
V–416: V–416 extends from the
Rosewood, OH, VORTAC to the
intersection of the Mansfield, OH,
VORTAC 045° and Sandusky, OH, VOR/
DME 107° radials (JAKEE fix). The
JAKEE fix is redefined in its existing
location using radials from the
Mansfield, OH, VORTAC and Dryer,
OH, VOR/DME.
The navigation aid radials cited in the
VOR Federal airway descriptions in this
action are stated relative to True north.
Domestic VOR Federal airways are
published in paragraph 6010(a) of FAA
Order 7400.9Y dated August 6, 2014,
and effective September 15, 2014, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The VOR Federal airways listed in
this document would be subsequently
published in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
E:\FR\FM\18SER1.SGM
18SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 181 (Thursday, September 18, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55995-55997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22237]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2014-0369; Airspace Docket No. 14-ANM-4]
RIN 2120-AA66
Modification of VOR Federal Airway V-298 in the Vicinity of
Pasco, WA
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action modifies VOR Federal airway V-298 in the vicinity
of Pasco, WA. The FAA is taking this action due to the Pasco, WA (PSC),
VHF Omnidirectional Range (VOR)/Distance Measuring Equipment (DME)
facility that provides navigation aid (NAVAID) guidance for a portion
of V-298, being relocated. This action will ensure the safety and
efficient management of
[[Page 55996]]
aircraft operating within the National Airspace System.
DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, November 13, 2014. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://
www.faa.gov/airtraffic/publications/. The Order is also
available for inspection at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federalregister/codeoffederal-regulations/
ibrlocations.html.
FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15. For further
information, you can contact the Airspace Policy and Regulations Group,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone: 202-267-8783.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy and
Regulations Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267-8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
The Tri-Cities Airport, located in Pasco, WA, is the fourth largest
air carrier airport in Washington State. In the past five years, the
number of enplanements at the airport has increased by nearly 100,000
per year. To accommodate this unprecedented growth, the Port of Pasco
is expanding the Tri-Cities Airport terminal to nearly double the size
of the existing terminal. However, the terminal expansion project
creates a proximity issue to one of the taxiways on the airfield
(taxiway D) by aircraft that will push back from the gates at the
expanded terminal, as well as encroaches into the PSC VOR 1,000 foot
clear zone.
To resolve the terminal expansion proximity issue with taxiway D,
approximately two thirds of the taxiway is being relocated to the
northeast, away from the terminal, to establish a straight, parallel
taxiway to runways 12/30 for the entire length of the taxiway. As a
result of the portion of taxiway D effected by the terminal expansion
being relocated, the new taxiway will run through the PSC VOR/DME site.
To overcome the airport terminal expansion encroaching on the PSC VOR
clear zone and, subsequently, the new taxiway D being relocated through
the VOR/DME site, the NAVAID will be moved north 0.44 nautical miles,
away from the airport terminal expansion and the taxiway relocation.
Moving the PSC VOR/DME enables the NAVAID to be retained and continue
providing ground-based navigation aid coverage for the existing VOR
Federal airway segments it supports today.
Due to the PSC VOR/DME NAVAID being relocated, VOR Federal airway
V-298 requires amendment action. The FAA is modifying this airway by
changing the PSC VOR radial information used to identify the
intersection point in the legal description using corrected radial
information from the PSC VOR/DME in its new location. Since this action
merely involves editorial changes in the legal descriptions of VOR
Federal Airways, and does not involve a change in the dimensions or
operating requirements of that airspace, notice and public procedure
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are unnecessary.
The Rule
The FAA is amending Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 to modify VOR Federal airway V-298. The PSC VOR/DME relocation,
due to the Tri-Cities Airport terminal expansion and taxiway D
relocation projects, has made this action necessary. The route
modification is outlined below.
V-298: V-298 extends between the Seattle, WA, VORTAC and Gillette,
WY, VOR. This action modifies the route segment between the Yakima, WA,
VORTAC and the PSC VOR/DME by changing the PSC radial used to describe
the intersection between the two NAVAIDs from the Pasco 274[deg] radial
to the Pasco 273[deg] radial. Additionally, this action removes
reference to a south alternate airway designation previously deleted by
regulatory action published in the Federal Register (48 FR 54829,
December 7, 1983).
The navigation aid radials cited in this action are stated relative
to True north.
Domestic VOR Federal airways are published in paragraph 6010(a) of
FAA Order 7400.9Y dated August 6, 2014, and effective September 15,
2014, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The VOR
Federal airway listed in this document would be subsequently published
in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so
minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it modifies the route structure as necessary to preserve the safe
and efficient flow of air traffic within the NAS.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
[[Page 55997]]
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Y,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014 and
effective September 15, 2014, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal Airways
* * * * *
V-298 [Amended]
From Seattle, WA; INT Seattle 107[deg] and Yakima, WA, 331[deg]
radials; Yakima; INT Yakima 129[deg] and Pasco, WA, 273[deg]
radials; Pasco; Pendleton, OR; 74 miles, 43 miles 115 MSL, 99 MSL
Donnelly, ID; 41 miles 99 MSL, 89 miles 145 MSL, Dubois, ID; 68
miles 130 MSL, Dunoir, WY; 62 miles 135 MSL, Boysen Reservoir, WY; 9
miles, 34 miles 105 MSL, Muddy Mountain,WY; to Gillette, WY.
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 11, 2014.
Ellen Crum,
Acting Manager, Airspace Policy and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2014-22237 Filed 9-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P