Extension of Waiver to Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration Systems Corporation of America Corporation From the Department of Energy Residential Refrigerator and Refrigerator-Freezer Test Procedures, 55769-55772 [2014-22175]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
capabilities of the National Laboratories
and review the use of laboratorydirected research and development
(LDRD) to meet the Department’s
science, energy, and national security
goals.
Purpose of the Meeting: This meeting
is the third meeting of the Commission.
Tentative Agenda: The meeting will
start at 10:30 a.m. on October 6. The
tentative meeting agenda includes a
review of work by the DOE National
Laboratories supporting other agencies,
as well as a discussion of technology
transfer and technology partnering at
the laboratories. Key presenters will
address and discuss these topics with
comments from the public. The meeting
will conclude at 4:00 p.m.
Public Participation: The meeting is
open to the public. Individuals who
would like to attend must RSVP to
Karen Gibson no later than 5:00 p.m. on
Wednesday, October 1, 2014, by email
at: crenel@hq.doe.gov. Please provide
your name, organization, citizenship,
and contact information. Anyone
attending the meeting will be required
to present government issued
identification. Individuals and
representatives of organizations who
would like to offer comments and
suggestions may do so at the end of the
meeting. Approximately 30 minutes will
be reserved for public comments. Time
allotted per speaker will depend on the
number who wish to speak but will not
exceed 5 minutes. The Designated
Federal Officer is empowered to
conduct the meeting in a fashion that
will facilitate the orderly conduct of
business. Those wishing to speak
should register to do so beginning at
10:30 a.m. on October 6.
Those not able to attend the meeting
or who have insufficient time to address
the committee are invited to send a
written statement to Karen Gibson, U.S.
Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585, or to email at:
crenel@hq.doe.gov.
Minutes: The minutes of the meeting
will be available on the Commission’s
Web site at: https://energy.gov/
labcommission.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
11, 2014.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–22190 Filed 9–16–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:24 Sep 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy
[Case No. RF–041]
Extension of Waiver to Panasonic
Appliances Refrigeration Systems
Corporation of America Corporation
From the Department of Energy
Residential Refrigerator and
Refrigerator-Freezer Test Procedures
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Extension of Waiver.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) is granting a waiver
extension (Case No. RF–041) to
Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration
Systems Corporation of America
(PAPRSA) to waive the requirements of
the DOE electric refrigerator and
refrigerator-freezer test procedures for
determining the energy consumption of
a specific hybrid basic model,
PR5180JKBC. Under today’s extension,
PAPRSA shall be required to test and
rate this hybrid wine chiller/beverage
center basic model using an alternate
test procedure that requires PAPRSA to
test the wine chiller compartment at
55 °F instead of the prescribed
temperature of 39 °F per title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)
part 430, subpart B, appendix A.
PAPRSA shall also use the K factor
(correction factor) value of 0.85 when
calculating the energy consumption.
DATES: This extension of waiver is
effective September 17, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Bryan Berringer, U.S. Department
of Energy, Building Technologies
Program, Mailstop EE–2J, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–0371, Email:
Bryan.Berringer@ee.doe.gov.
Mr. Michael Kido, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
Mail Stop GC–71, Forrestal Building,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0103.
Telephone: (202) 586–8145. Email:
Michael.Kido@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with 10 CFR 430.27(g), DOE
gives notice of the issuance of its
extension of waiver as set forth below.
The extension of waiver grants PAPRSA
a waiver from the applicable residential
refrigerator and refrigerator-freezer test
procedures found in 10 CFR part 430,
subpart B, appendix A for certain basic
models of hybrid wine chiller/beverage
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55769
center products, provided that PAPRSA
tests and rates such products using the
alternate test procedure described in
this notice. Today’s extension prohibits
PAPRSA from making representations
concerning the energy efficiency of
these products unless the product has
been tested in a manner consistent with
the provisions and restrictions in the
alternate test procedure set forth in the
extension below, and the
representations fairly disclose the test
results. Distributors, retailers, and
private labelers are held to the same
standard when making representations
regarding the energy efficiency of these
products. 42 U.S.C. 6293(c).
I. Background and Authority
Title III, Part B of the Energy Policy
and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA),
Public Law 94–163 (42 U.S.C. 6291–
6309, as codified) established the
Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products Other Than
Automobiles, a program covering most
major household appliances, which
includes the residential electric
refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers
that are the focus of this notice.1 Part B
includes definitions, test procedures,
labeling provisions, energy conservation
standards, and the authority to require
information and reports from
manufacturers. Further, Part B
authorizes the Secretary of Energy to
prescribe test procedures that are
reasonably designed to produce results
that measure energy efficiency, energy
use, or estimated operating costs, and
that are not unduly burdensome to
conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) The test
procedure for residential electric
refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers is
set forth in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B,
appendix A.
DOE’s regulations allow a person to
seek a waiver from the test procedure
requirements for a particular basic
model of a type of covered consumer
product when (1) the petitioner’s basic
model for which the petition for waiver
was submitted contains one or more
design characteristics that prevent
testing according to the prescribed test
procedure, or (2) when prescribed test
procedures may evaluate the basic
model in a manner so unrepresentative
of its true energy consumption
characteristics as to provide materially
inaccurate comparative data. 10 CFR
430.27(a)(1). Petitioners must include in
their petition any alternate test
procedures known to the petitioner to
evaluate the basic model in a manner
1 For editorial reasons, upon codification in the
U.S. Code, Part B was re-designated Part A.
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
55770
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
representative of its energy
consumption characteristics.
The granting of a waiver is subject to
conditions, including adherence to
alternate test procedures. 10 CFR
430.27(f)(2). As soon as practicable after
the granting of any waiver, DOE will
publish in the Federal Register a notice
of proposed rulemaking to amend its
regulations so as to eliminate any need
for the continuation of such waiver. As
soon thereafter as practicable, DOE will
publish in the Federal Register a final
rule. 10 CFR 430.27(l). The waiver
process also allows the granting of an
interim waiver from test procedure
requirements to manufacturers that have
petitioned DOE for a waiver of such
prescribed test procedures. 10 CFR
430.27(e). Within one year of issuance
of an interim waiver, DOE will either: (i)
Publish in the Federal Register a
determination on the petition for
waiver; or (ii) Publish in the Federal
Register a new or amended test
procedure that addresses the issues
presented in the waiver. 10 CFR
430.27(h)(1).
A petitioner may request that DOE
extend the scope of a waiver or an
interim waiver to include additional
basic models employing the same
technology as the basic model(s) set
forth in the original petition. DOE will
publish any such extension in the
Federal Register. 10 CFR 430.27(g).
II. PAPRSA’s Extension of Waiver:
Assertions and Determinations
On July 2, 2014, PAPRSA requested
an extension of its previous waivers
(Case Nos. RF–022 and RF–031) under
10 CFR 430.27(g) for its hybrid wine
chiller/beverage center basic model,
PR5180JKBC pertaining to appendix A
to subpart B of 10 CFR part 430. Because
PAPRSA has elected to utilize
Appendix A to Subpart B of Part 430
prior to the September 15, 2014 effective
date to measure the energy consumption
of its new basic hybrid model, testing of
the refrigerated beverage compartment
will be conducted at 39 °F as specified
in Appendix A, as opposed to 38 °F as
specified in the Appendix A1 test
method under which PAPRSA’s waiver
hybrid models were previously
certified. DOE is publishing PAPRSA’s
extension of waiver in its entirety.
DOE granted a similar waiver to
PAPRSA through an interim waiver (78
FR 35894 (June 14, 2013)) and a
subsequent Decision and Order (78 FR
57139 (September 17, 2013)) under Case
No. RF–031. Additionally, DOE granted
a similar waiver to Sanyo E&E
Corporation (Sanyo) through an interim
waiver (77 FR 19654 (April 2, 2012))
and a subsequent Decision and Order
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:24 Sep 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
(77 FR 49443 (August 16, 2012)) under
Case No. RF–022. On October 4, 2012,
DOE issued a notice of correction to the
Decision and Order incorporating a K
factor (correction factor) value of 0.85
when calculating the energy
consumption (77 FR 60688). Sanyo E&E
Corporation has since changed its
corporate name to Panasonic
Appliances Refrigeration Systems
Corporation of America, meaning that it
is the same manufacturer to which DOE
granted the August 2012 waiver.
PAPRSA submitted a petition for waiver
and application for interim waiver from
the test procedure applicable to
residential electric refrigerators and
refrigerator-freezers set forth in 10 CFR
Part 430, subpart B, appendix A1. In its
petition, PAPRSA sought a waiver from
the existing DOE test procedure
applicable to refrigerators and
refrigerator-freezers under 10 CFR Part
430 for PAPRSA’s hybrid models that
consist of single-cabinet units with a
refrigerated beverage compartment in
the top portion and a wine storage
compartment in the bottom of the units.
DOE issued guidance that clarified the
test procedures to be used for hybrid
products such as the PAPRSA model at
issue here: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/
buildings/appliance_standards/
residential/pdfs/refrigerator_definition_
faq.pdf. This guidance specifies that
basic models such as the ones PAPRSA
identifies in its petition, which do not
have a separate wine storage
compartment with a separate exterior
door, are to be tested according to the
DOE test procedure in Appendix A1,
with the temperatures specified therein.
PAPRSA asserts that the wine storage
compartment cannot be tested at the
prescribed temperature of 38 °F, because
the minimum compartment temperature
is 45 °F. PAPRSA submitted an alternate
test procedure to account for the energy
consumption of its wine chiller/
beverage centers. That alternate
procedure would test the wine chiller
compartment at 55 °F, instead of the
prescribed 38 °F. To justify the use of
this standardized temperature for
testing, PAPRSA stated in its petition
that it designed these models to provide
an average temperature of 55 to 57 °F,
which it determined is a commonly
recommended temperature for wine
storage, suggesting that this temperature
is presumed to be representative of
expected consumer use. 77 FR 19656.
DOE notes that the test procedures for
wine chillers adopted by the
Association of Home Appliance
Manufacturers (AHAM), California
Energy Commission (CEC), and Natural
Resources Canada all use a standardized
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
compartment temperature of 55 °F for
wine chiller compartments, which is
consistent with PAPRSA’s approach.
III. Conclusion
After careful consideration of all the
material submitted by PAPRSA, it is
ordered that:
(1) The extension of waiver submitted
by the Panasonic Appliances
Refrigeration Systems Corporation of
America (Case No. RF–041) is hereby
granted as set forth in the paragraphs
below.
(2) PAPRSA shall be required to test
and rate the following PAPRSA model
according to the alternate test procedure
set forth in paragraph (3) below:
PR5180JKBC
(3) PAPRSA shall be required to test
the products listed in paragraph (2)
above according to the test procedures
for electric refrigerator-freezers
prescribed by DOE at 10 CFR part 430,
Appendix A, except that, for the
PAPRSA products listed in paragraph
(2) only, test the wine chiller
compartment at 55 °F, instead of the
prescribed 39 °F.
PAPRSA shall also use the K factor
(correction factor) value of 0.85 when
calculating the energy consumption of
one of the models listed above.
Therefore, the energy consumption is
defined by the higher of the two values
calculated by the following two
formulas (according to 10 CFR part 430,
subpart B, Appendix A):
Energy consumption of the wine
compartment:
EWine = ET1 + [(ET2–ET1) × (55 °F–
TW1)/(TW2–TW1)] *0.85
Energy consumption of the
refrigerated beverage compartment:
EBeverage Compartment = ET1 + [(ET2–
ET1) × (39 °F–TBC1)/(TBC2–
TBC1)].
(4) Representations. PAPRSA may
make representations about the energy
use of its hybrid wine chiller/beverage
center products for compliance,
marketing, or other purposes only to the
extent that such products have been
tested in accordance with the provisions
outlined above and such representations
fairly disclose the results of such
testing.
(5) This waiver shall remain in effect
consistent with the provisions of 10 CFR
430.27(l).
(6) This waiver is issued on the
condition that the statements,
representations, and documentary
materials provided by the petitioner are
valid. DOE may revoke or modify this
waiver at any time if it determines the
factual basis underlying the petition for
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Notices
waiver is incorrect, or the results from
the alternate test procedure are
unrepresentative of the basic models’
true energy consumption characteristics.
(7) This waiver applies only to those
basic models set out in PAPRSA’s July
2, 2014 extension of waiver. Granting of
this extension does not release a
petitioner from the certification
requirements set forth at 10 CFR part
429.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
10, 2014.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy.
BEFORE THE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Washington, DC 20585
In the Matter of: Panasonic
Appliances Refrigeration Systems
Corporation of America, Petitioner
Case Number: RF–022; RF–301
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF
WAIVER AND INTERIM WAIVER
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration
Systems Corporation of America
(‘‘PAPRSA’’) respectfully submits this
Request for Extension of Waiver and
Interim Waiver (‘‘Request’’) pursuant to
10 C.F.R. § 430.27(g). PAPRSA intends
to introduce a new basic hybrid wine
chiller/beverage center model (‘‘hybrid
model’’) listed below that contains the
same design characteristics that prevent
testing of the basic model according to
the test procedures prescribed in 10
C.F.R. § 430, subpart B, appendix A and
for which PAPRSA received two
previous waivers and interim waivers as
a result. As detailed more fully below,
the Department of Energy (‘‘DOE’’) has
previously granted PAPRSA 1 two
separate waivers from DOE’s electric
refrigerator and refrigerator-freezer test
procedures for determining the energy
consumption of substantially similar
hybrid models in Case Nos. RF–022 and
RF–301 (the ‘‘waiver hybrid models’’).2
1 The first waiver granted in Case No. RF–022 was
issued to SANYO E&E Corporation. Effective April
1, 2013, SANYO E&E Corporation changed its
corporate name to Panasonic Appliances
Refrigeration Systems Corporation of America.
Throughout this Petition, PAPRSA will be used to
refer to both SANYO E&E Corporation and
Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration Systems
Corporation of America, unless otherwise indicated.
2 PAPRSA notes at the outset that its waiver
hybrid models were tested and certified by
incorporating the standards contained 10 C.F.R.
§ 430, subpart B, appendix A1 as they relate to the
refrigerated beverage compartment of these single
cabinet units. For the new basic hybrid model,
PAPRSA is electing to utilize 10 C.F.R. § 430,
subpart B, appendix A prior to the September 15,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:24 Sep 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
PAPRSA has developed a new basic
hybrid model, PR5180JKBC, that
contains the same design characteristics
as its waiver hybrid models that make
it impossible to certify, rate, and sell
this new hybrid model under the
existing testing procedures. PAPRSA
therefore respectfully requests that DOE
extend the previously granted waivers
and interim waivers to these new basic
hybrid models and that it be permitted
to employ the alternative testing method
for this new basic hybrid model that has
already been approved by DOE for the
waiver hybrid models.
1. Existing Waiver Background and
Product Characteristics of PAPRSA’s
Hybrid Models
On June 2, 2011, PAPRSA submitted
a petition for waiver with respect to the
test procedures for its waiver hybrid
models that consist of a combination of
a refrigerated ‘‘beverage’’ compartment
in the top portion of these single-cabinet
units and a wine storage compartment
on the bottom of the units, and for
which an alternative testing procedure
was necessary in order to certify, rate,
and sell such models. The waiver
hybrid models include the following
models: JUB248LB, JUB248RB,
JUB248LW, JUB248RW, KBCO24LS,
KBCS24LS, KBCO24RS, KBCS24RS, and
MBCM24FW.
As PAPRSA previously explained,
PAPRSA designed the wine storage
compartments of its waiver hybrid
models to operate between a minimum
temperature of 45 °F and a maximum
temperature of 64 °F, with an average
temperature of 55 to 57 °F. In fact,
heaters are used to ensure that the
temperature in the wine storage
compartment never drops below 45 °F,
as wines chilled below this temperature
risk becoming crystallized and,
therefore, ruined. Currently, however,
DOE’s testing procedures contained in
10 C.F.R. § 430, subpart B, appendix A1,
mandate that energy consumption be
measured when the compartment
temperature is set at 38 °F. Based on the
design characteristics of its waiver
hybrid models noted above, however,
PAPRSA needed a waiver with respect
to DOE’s testing procedures in order to
properly ‘‘certify, rate, and sell such
models,’’ because the existing test
procedures contained in 10 C.F.R. § 430,
subpart B, appendix A1, do not
contemplate a product that is designed
to be incapable of achieving a
temperature below 45 °F.
On April 2, 2012, DOE published
PAPRSA’s previous petition for waiver
2014 effective date to measure the energy
consumption of its new basic hybrid model.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55771
and sought public comment, and DOE
subsequently extended the deadline for
comments after PAPRSA submitted a
request for extension to clarify the scope
of its original petition for waiver. See
Federal Register, Vol. 77, No. 96,
29331–29333. No comments were filed
opposing the relief requested in
PAPRSA’s petition for waiver.
On August 9, 2012, DOE granted
PAPRSA a waiver from DOE’s electric
refrigerator and refrigerator-freezer test
procedures for determining the energy
consumption of the basic models listed
in its June 2, 2011 petition for waiver.
See Federal Register, Vol. 77, No. 159,
49443–44. In permitting PAPRSA to test
the wine chiller compartment at 55 °F,
DOE noted ‘‘that the test procedures for
wine chillers adopted by the
Association of Home Appliance
Manufacturers (AHAM), California
Energy Commission (CEC), and Natural
Resources Canada all use a standardized
compartment temperature of 55 °F for
wine chiller compartments, which is
consistent with [PAPRSA’s] approach.’’
Id. at 49444.
On September 26, 2012, DOE issued
a correction to its August 9, 2012 order
that incorporated the K factor
(correction factor) value of .85 that
PAPRSA should utilize when
calculating the energy consumption of
its waiver hybrid models. See Federal
Register, Vol. 77, No. 193, 60688–89.
Accordingly, DOE ultimately directed
PAPRSA to utilize the following test
procedure for its waiver hybrid models:
Energy consumption is defined by the
higher of the two values calculated by
the following two formulas (according
to 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, Appendix
A1):
Energy consumption of the wine
compartment:
EWine = (ET1 + [(ET2–ET1) × (55 °F–
TW1)/(TW2–TW1)]) *0.85
Energy consumption of the
refrigerated beverage compartment:
EBeverage Compartment = ET1 + [(ET2–
ET1) × (38 °F–TBC1)/(TBC2–
TBC1)].
See Federal Register, Vol. 77, No. 193
at 60689.
On April 29, 2013, PAPRSA
submitted a second petition for waiver
and interim waiver for a substantially
similar hybrid model, SR5180JBC, that
shares the same design characteristics
that led DOE to approve PAPRSA’s June
2, 2011 waiver request. No comments
were filed opposing the relief requested
in PAPRSA’s second petition for waiver
and interim waiver. On September 17,
2013, DOE again granted PAPRSA a
waiver from DOE’s electric refrigerator
and refrigerator-freezer test procedures
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
55772
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Notices
for determining the energy consumption
of basic hybrid model SR5180JBC. See
Federal Register, Vol. 78, No. 180,
57139–41.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Request to Extend Scope of
Previously Granted Waivers and
Interim Waivers to New Basic Hybrid
Model under Previously Approved
Alternative Testing Procedure
As indicated above, PAPRSA has
developed a new basic hybrid model,
PR5180JKBC, that shares the same
design characteristics that led DOE to
approve PAPRSA’s two prior petitions
for waiver. This new basic hybrid model
is a single cabinet hybrid model that
would be classified as a compact
refrigerator with automatic defrost
without through-the-door ice service,
but which has a wine-chiller
compartment designed for an average
temperature of 55 to 57 °F. Just as
PAPRSA’s waiver hybrid models, this
new basic hybrid model contains a
heater that makes it impossible for the
temperature of the wine-chiller
compartment to reach a temperature
below 45 °F. Thus, testing this new
hybrid model at 39 °F is simply not
possible and not representative of the
energy consumption characteristics of
this new basic hybrid model.
Further, this new basic hybrid model,
just as PAPRSA’s waiver hybrid models,
will have a door-opening usage aligned
with household freezers, thus 0.85
should also be the employed K factor
(correction factor) for this basic hybrid
model. See Appendix B1 to Subpart
430, 5.2.1.1, because Subpart 430 does
not recognize wine chiller as a category.
In short, there are no material
differences between this new basic
hybrid model and PAPRSA’s waiver
hybrid models as it impacts this
Request. The design differences between
the new basic hybrid model and the
waiver hybrid models are the
introduction of a more efficient
compressor and new external electronic
controls. Although the new basic hybrid
model will be more energy efficient, the
design characteristics of the new basic
hybrid model are the same as the
characteristics of PAPRSA’s waiver
hybrid models that led DOE to grant the
prior two waivers. Accordingly,
PAPRSA respectfully requests that it be
permitted to use the following testing
procedure for its new basic hybrid
model:
Energy consumption is defined by the
higher of the two values calculated by
the following two formulas (according
to 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, Appendix
A):
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:24 Sep 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
Energy consumption of the wine
compartment:
EWine = (ET1 + [(ET2–ET1) × (55 °F–
TW1)/(TW2–TW1)]) *0.85
Energy consumption of the
refrigerated beverage compartment:
EBeverage Compartment = ET1 + [(ET2–
ET1) × (39 °F–TBC1)/(TBC2–
TBC1)].3
Accordingly, PAPRSA respectfully
requests that DOE extend the waivers
that DOE previously granted it and that
PAPRSA be permitted to use this
approved alternative testing method to
test, certify and rate the new basic
hybrid models in the same manner as its
waiver hybrid models subject to the
existing waivers.
3. Grounds for Interim Waiver
Pursuant to 10 CFR part 430.27(b)(2),
applicants for an interim waiver should
address the likely success of their
petition and what economic hardships
and/or competitive disadvantages are
likely to arise absent the grant of an
interim waiver.
As detailed above, it is highly likely
that DOE will grant this Request, as
PAPRSA is simply seeking to test a new
basic hybrid model under the
alternative testing procedure already
approved twice by DOE for PAPRSA’s
other hybrid models subject to the
existing waivers. The new basic hybrid
models contain no materially different
design characteristics that should
warrant a different result.
Further, as DOE has previously stated,
‘‘[f]ully recognizing that product
development occurs faster than the test
procedure rulemaking process, the
Department’s rules permit
manufacturers of models not
contemplated by the test procedures
. . . to petition for a test procedure
waiver in order to certify, rate, and sell
such models.’’ GC Enforcement
Guidance on the Application of Waivers
and on the Waiver Process at 2 (rel. Dec.
23, 2010); 4 see also DOE FAQ Guidance
Regarding Coverage of Wine Chillers,
Etc. in the R/F Standard/Test Procedure
at 2 (rel. Feb. 10, 2011) (‘‘DOE
recognizes the potential disparity in
treatment among these hybrid products.
As DOE indicated . . . , the Department
3 As
a result of electing to utilize Appendix A to
Subpart B of Part 430 prior to the September 15,
2014 effective date to measure the energy
consumption of its new basic hybrid model, testing
of the refrigerated beverage compartment will be
conducted at 39 °F as specified in Appendix A, as
opposed to 38 °F as specified in Appendix A1 and
under which PAPRSA’s waiver hybrid models were
previously certified.
4 Available at https://www.gc.energy.gov/
documents/LargeCapacityRCW_guidance_
122210.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
plans to engage in a future rulemaking
to more comprehensively address these
types of products.’’).
Certain manufacturers design
comparable hybrid models so that the
beverage center compartment does not
reach below 40 °F, and thus are not
covered products under DOE’s
regulations. Unless PAPRSA is granted
an interim waiver, it will be at a
competitive disadvantage by being
unable to introduce the new basic
hybrid model to compete with
manufacturers that design their hybrid
models in a manner that falls outside of
DOE’s jurisdiction.
Thus, given that this Request is likely
to be granted and PAPRSA will face
economic hardship unless an interim
waiver is granted, permitting PAPRSA
to immediately certify the new basic
hybrid model under the alternative
testing method already approved by
DOE is in the public interest.
Respectfully submitted,
Alan G. Fishel
Adam D. Bowser
Arent Fox LLP, 1717 K St. NW., Washington,
DC 20036–5369, (202) 857–6450, fishel.alan@
arentfox.com, bowser.adam@arentfox.com,
Counsel for Panasonic Appliances
Refrigeration Systems Corporation of
America
July 2, 2014
[FR Doc. 2014–22175 Filed 9–16–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy
[Case No. RF–040]
Notice of Petition for Waiver of SubZero From the Department of Energy
Residential Refrigerator and
Refrigerator-Freezer Test Procedure
and Grant of Interim Waiver
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of Petition for Waiver,
Notice of Granting Application for
Interim Waiver, and Request for Public
Comments.
AGENCY:
This notice announces receipt
and publication of a petition for waiver
submitted by the Sub-Zero Group, Inc.
from specified portions of the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) test
procedure for determining the energy
consumption of electric refrigerators
and refrigerator-freezers. Sub-Zero’s
request pertains to the specific hybrid
refrigerated ‘‘storage-wine storage’’ basic
models set forth in its petition. Sub-Zero
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55769-55772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22175]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
[Case No. RF-041]
Extension of Waiver to Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration Systems
Corporation of America Corporation From the Department of Energy
Residential Refrigerator and Refrigerator-Freezer Test Procedures
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Extension of Waiver.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is granting a waiver
extension (Case No. RF-041) to Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration
Systems Corporation of America (PAPRSA) to waive the requirements of
the DOE electric refrigerator and refrigerator-freezer test procedures
for determining the energy consumption of a specific hybrid basic
model, PR5180JKBC. Under today's extension, PAPRSA shall be required to
test and rate this hybrid wine chiller/beverage center basic model
using an alternate test procedure that requires PAPRSA to test the wine
chiller compartment at 55 [deg]F instead of the prescribed temperature
of 39 [deg]F per title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)
part 430, subpart B, appendix A. PAPRSA shall also use the K factor
(correction factor) value of 0.85 when calculating the energy
consumption.
DATES: This extension of waiver is effective September 17, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Bryan Berringer, U.S. Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-0371, Email:
Bryan.Berringer@ee.doe.gov.
Mr. Michael Kido, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, Mail Stop GC-71, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585-0103. Telephone: (202) 586-8145. Email:
Michael.Kido@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 10 CFR 430.27(g), DOE
gives notice of the issuance of its extension of waiver as set forth
below. The extension of waiver grants PAPRSA a waiver from the
applicable residential refrigerator and refrigerator-freezer test
procedures found in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix A for certain
basic models of hybrid wine chiller/beverage center products, provided
that PAPRSA tests and rates such products using the alternate test
procedure described in this notice. Today's extension prohibits PAPRSA
from making representations concerning the energy efficiency of these
products unless the product has been tested in a manner consistent with
the provisions and restrictions in the alternate test procedure set
forth in the extension below, and the representations fairly disclose
the test results. Distributors, retailers, and private labelers are
held to the same standard when making representations regarding the
energy efficiency of these products. 42 U.S.C. 6293(c).
I. Background and Authority
Title III, Part B of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975
(EPCA), Public Law 94-163 (42 U.S.C. 6291-6309, as codified)
established the Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products Other
Than Automobiles, a program covering most major household appliances,
which includes the residential electric refrigerators and refrigerator-
freezers that are the focus of this notice.\1\ Part B includes
definitions, test procedures, labeling provisions, energy conservation
standards, and the authority to require information and reports from
manufacturers. Further, Part B authorizes the Secretary of Energy to
prescribe test procedures that are reasonably designed to produce
results that measure energy efficiency, energy use, or estimated
operating costs, and that are not unduly burdensome to conduct. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) The test procedure for residential electric
refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers is set forth in 10 CFR part
430, subpart B, appendix A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For editorial reasons, upon codification in the U.S. Code,
Part B was re-designated Part A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE's regulations allow a person to seek a waiver from the test
procedure requirements for a particular basic model of a type of
covered consumer product when (1) the petitioner's basic model for
which the petition for waiver was submitted contains one or more design
characteristics that prevent testing according to the prescribed test
procedure, or (2) when prescribed test procedures may evaluate the
basic model in a manner so unrepresentative of its true energy
consumption characteristics as to provide materially inaccurate
comparative data. 10 CFR 430.27(a)(1). Petitioners must include in
their petition any alternate test procedures known to the petitioner to
evaluate the basic model in a manner
[[Page 55770]]
representative of its energy consumption characteristics.
The granting of a waiver is subject to conditions, including
adherence to alternate test procedures. 10 CFR 430.27(f)(2). As soon as
practicable after the granting of any waiver, DOE will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend its
regulations so as to eliminate any need for the continuation of such
waiver. As soon thereafter as practicable, DOE will publish in the
Federal Register a final rule. 10 CFR 430.27(l). The waiver process
also allows the granting of an interim waiver from test procedure
requirements to manufacturers that have petitioned DOE for a waiver of
such prescribed test procedures. 10 CFR 430.27(e). Within one year of
issuance of an interim waiver, DOE will either: (i) Publish in the
Federal Register a determination on the petition for waiver; or (ii)
Publish in the Federal Register a new or amended test procedure that
addresses the issues presented in the waiver. 10 CFR 430.27(h)(1).
A petitioner may request that DOE extend the scope of a waiver or
an interim waiver to include additional basic models employing the same
technology as the basic model(s) set forth in the original petition.
DOE will publish any such extension in the Federal Register. 10 CFR
430.27(g).
II. PAPRSA's Extension of Waiver: Assertions and Determinations
On July 2, 2014, PAPRSA requested an extension of its previous
waivers (Case Nos. RF-022 and RF-031) under 10 CFR 430.27(g) for its
hybrid wine chiller/beverage center basic model, PR5180JKBC pertaining
to appendix A to subpart B of 10 CFR part 430. Because PAPRSA has
elected to utilize Appendix A to Subpart B of Part 430 prior to the
September 15, 2014 effective date to measure the energy consumption of
its new basic hybrid model, testing of the refrigerated beverage
compartment will be conducted at 39 [deg]F as specified in Appendix A,
as opposed to 38 [deg]F as specified in the Appendix A1 test method
under which PAPRSA's waiver hybrid models were previously certified.
DOE is publishing PAPRSA's extension of waiver in its entirety.
DOE granted a similar waiver to PAPRSA through an interim waiver
(78 FR 35894 (June 14, 2013)) and a subsequent Decision and Order (78
FR 57139 (September 17, 2013)) under Case No. RF-031. Additionally, DOE
granted a similar waiver to Sanyo E&E Corporation (Sanyo) through an
interim waiver (77 FR 19654 (April 2, 2012)) and a subsequent Decision
and Order (77 FR 49443 (August 16, 2012)) under Case No. RF-022. On
October 4, 2012, DOE issued a notice of correction to the Decision and
Order incorporating a K factor (correction factor) value of 0.85 when
calculating the energy consumption (77 FR 60688). Sanyo E&E Corporation
has since changed its corporate name to Panasonic Appliances
Refrigeration Systems Corporation of America, meaning that it is the
same manufacturer to which DOE granted the August 2012 waiver. PAPRSA
submitted a petition for waiver and application for interim waiver from
the test procedure applicable to residential electric refrigerators and
refrigerator-freezers set forth in 10 CFR Part 430, subpart B, appendix
A1. In its petition, PAPRSA sought a waiver from the existing DOE test
procedure applicable to refrigerators and refrigerator-freezers under
10 CFR Part 430 for PAPRSA's hybrid models that consist of single-
cabinet units with a refrigerated beverage compartment in the top
portion and a wine storage compartment in the bottom of the units. DOE
issued guidance that clarified the test procedures to be used for
hybrid products such as the PAPRSA model at issue here: https://
www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliancestandards/residential/
pdfs/refrigeratordefinitionfaq.pdf. This guidance
specifies that basic models such as the ones PAPRSA identifies in its
petition, which do not have a separate wine storage compartment with a
separate exterior door, are to be tested according to the DOE test
procedure in Appendix A1, with the temperatures specified therein.
PAPRSA asserts that the wine storage compartment cannot be tested at
the prescribed temperature of 38 [deg]F, because the minimum
compartment temperature is 45 [deg]F. PAPRSA submitted an alternate
test procedure to account for the energy consumption of its wine
chiller/beverage centers. That alternate procedure would test the wine
chiller compartment at 55 [deg]F, instead of the prescribed 38 [deg]F.
To justify the use of this standardized temperature for testing, PAPRSA
stated in its petition that it designed these models to provide an
average temperature of 55 to 57 [deg]F, which it determined is a
commonly recommended temperature for wine storage, suggesting that this
temperature is presumed to be representative of expected consumer use.
77 FR 19656. DOE notes that the test procedures for wine chillers
adopted by the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM),
California Energy Commission (CEC), and Natural Resources Canada all
use a standardized compartment temperature of 55 [deg]F for wine
chiller compartments, which is consistent with PAPRSA's approach.
III. Conclusion
After careful consideration of all the material submitted by
PAPRSA, it is ordered that:
(1) The extension of waiver submitted by the Panasonic Appliances
Refrigeration Systems Corporation of America (Case No. RF-041) is
hereby granted as set forth in the paragraphs below.
(2) PAPRSA shall be required to test and rate the following PAPRSA
model according to the alternate test procedure set forth in paragraph
(3) below:
PR5180JKBC
(3) PAPRSA shall be required to test the products listed in
paragraph (2) above according to the test procedures for electric
refrigerator-freezers prescribed by DOE at 10 CFR part 430, Appendix A,
except that, for the PAPRSA products listed in paragraph (2) only, test
the wine chiller compartment at 55 [deg]F, instead of the prescribed 39
[deg]F.
PAPRSA shall also use the K factor (correction factor) value of
0.85 when calculating the energy consumption of one of the models
listed above. Therefore, the energy consumption is defined by the
higher of the two values calculated by the following two formulas
(according to 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, Appendix A):
Energy consumption of the wine compartment:
EWine = ET1 + [(ET2-ET1) x (55 [deg]F-TW1)/(TW2-TW1)] *0.85
Energy consumption of the refrigerated beverage compartment:
EBeverage Compartment = ET1 + [(ET2-ET1) x (39 [deg]F-TBC1)/(TBC2-
TBC1)].
(4) Representations. PAPRSA may make representations about the
energy use of its hybrid wine chiller/beverage center products for
compliance, marketing, or other purposes only to the extent that such
products have been tested in accordance with the provisions outlined
above and such representations fairly disclose the results of such
testing.
(5) This waiver shall remain in effect consistent with the
provisions of 10 CFR 430.27(l).
(6) This waiver is issued on the condition that the statements,
representations, and documentary materials provided by the petitioner
are valid. DOE may revoke or modify this waiver at any time if it
determines the factual basis underlying the petition for
[[Page 55771]]
waiver is incorrect, or the results from the alternate test procedure
are unrepresentative of the basic models' true energy consumption
characteristics.
(7) This waiver applies only to those basic models set out in
PAPRSA's July 2, 2014 extension of waiver. Granting of this extension
does not release a petitioner from the certification requirements set
forth at 10 CFR part 429.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 10, 2014.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
BEFORE THE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Washington, DC 20585
In the Matter of: Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration Systems
Corporation of America, Petitioner
Case Number: RF-022; RF-301
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF WAIVER AND INTERIM WAIVER
Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration Systems Corporation of America
(``PAPRSA'') respectfully submits this Request for Extension of Waiver
and Interim Waiver (``Request'') pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Sec. 430.27(g).
PAPRSA intends to introduce a new basic hybrid wine chiller/beverage
center model (``hybrid model'') listed below that contains the same
design characteristics that prevent testing of the basic model
according to the test procedures prescribed in 10 C.F.R. Sec. 430,
subpart B, appendix A and for which PAPRSA received two previous
waivers and interim waivers as a result. As detailed more fully below,
the Department of Energy (``DOE'') has previously granted PAPRSA \1\
two separate waivers from DOE's electric refrigerator and refrigerator-
freezer test procedures for determining the energy consumption of
substantially similar hybrid models in Case Nos. RF-022 and RF-301 (the
``waiver hybrid models'').\2\ PAPRSA has developed a new basic hybrid
model, PR5180JKBC, that contains the same design characteristics as its
waiver hybrid models that make it impossible to certify, rate, and sell
this new hybrid model under the existing testing procedures. PAPRSA
therefore respectfully requests that DOE extend the previously granted
waivers and interim waivers to these new basic hybrid models and that
it be permitted to employ the alternative testing method for this new
basic hybrid model that has already been approved by DOE for the waiver
hybrid models.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The first waiver granted in Case No. RF-022 was issued to
SANYO E&E Corporation. Effective April 1, 2013, SANYO E&E
Corporation changed its corporate name to Panasonic Appliances
Refrigeration Systems Corporation of America. Throughout this
Petition, PAPRSA will be used to refer to both SANYO E&E Corporation
and Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration Systems Corporation of
America, unless otherwise indicated.
\2\ PAPRSA notes at the outset that its waiver hybrid models
were tested and certified by incorporating the standards contained
10 C.F.R. Sec. 430, subpart B, appendix A1 as they relate to the
refrigerated beverage compartment of these single cabinet units. For
the new basic hybrid model, PAPRSA is electing to utilize 10 C.F.R.
Sec. 430, subpart B, appendix A prior to the September 15, 2014
effective date to measure the energy consumption of its new basic
hybrid model.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Existing Waiver Background and Product Characteristics of PAPRSA's
Hybrid Models
On June 2, 2011, PAPRSA submitted a petition for waiver with
respect to the test procedures for its waiver hybrid models that
consist of a combination of a refrigerated ``beverage'' compartment in
the top portion of these single-cabinet units and a wine storage
compartment on the bottom of the units, and for which an alternative
testing procedure was necessary in order to certify, rate, and sell
such models. The waiver hybrid models include the following models:
JUB248LB, JUB248RB, JUB248LW, JUB248RW, KBCO24LS, KBCS24LS, KBCO24RS,
KBCS24RS, and MBCM24FW.
As PAPRSA previously explained, PAPRSA designed the wine storage
compartments of its waiver hybrid models to operate between a minimum
temperature of 45 [deg]F and a maximum temperature of 64 [deg]F, with
an average temperature of 55 to 57 [deg]F. In fact, heaters are used to
ensure that the temperature in the wine storage compartment never drops
below 45 [deg]F, as wines chilled below this temperature risk becoming
crystallized and, therefore, ruined. Currently, however, DOE's testing
procedures contained in 10 C.F.R. Sec. 430, subpart B, appendix A1,
mandate that energy consumption be measured when the compartment
temperature is set at 38 [deg]F. Based on the design characteristics of
its waiver hybrid models noted above, however, PAPRSA needed a waiver
with respect to DOE's testing procedures in order to properly
``certify, rate, and sell such models,'' because the existing test
procedures contained in 10 C.F.R. Sec. 430, subpart B, appendix A1, do
not contemplate a product that is designed to be incapable of achieving
a temperature below 45 [deg]F.
On April 2, 2012, DOE published PAPRSA's previous petition for
waiver and sought public comment, and DOE subsequently extended the
deadline for comments after PAPRSA submitted a request for extension to
clarify the scope of its original petition for waiver. See Federal
Register, Vol. 77, No. 96, 29331-29333. No comments were filed opposing
the relief requested in PAPRSA's petition for waiver.
On August 9, 2012, DOE granted PAPRSA a waiver from DOE's electric
refrigerator and refrigerator-freezer test procedures for determining
the energy consumption of the basic models listed in its June 2, 2011
petition for waiver. See Federal Register, Vol. 77, No. 159, 49443-44.
In permitting PAPRSA to test the wine chiller compartment at 55 [deg]F,
DOE noted ``that the test procedures for wine chillers adopted by the
Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM), California Energy
Commission (CEC), and Natural Resources Canada all use a standardized
compartment temperature of 55 [deg]F for wine chiller compartments,
which is consistent with [PAPRSA's] approach.'' Id. at 49444.
On September 26, 2012, DOE issued a correction to its August 9,
2012 order that incorporated the K factor (correction factor) value of
.85 that PAPRSA should utilize when calculating the energy consumption
of its waiver hybrid models. See Federal Register, Vol. 77, No. 193,
60688-89. Accordingly, DOE ultimately directed PAPRSA to utilize the
following test procedure for its waiver hybrid models:
Energy consumption is defined by the higher of the two values
calculated by the following two formulas (according to 10 CFR part 430,
subpart B, Appendix A1):
Energy consumption of the wine compartment:
EWine = (ET1 + [(ET2-ET1) x (55 [deg]F-TW1)/(TW2-TW1)]) *0.85
Energy consumption of the refrigerated beverage compartment:
EBeverage Compartment = ET1 + [(ET2-ET1) x (38 [deg]F-TBC1)/(TBC2-
TBC1)].
See Federal Register, Vol. 77, No. 193 at 60689.
On April 29, 2013, PAPRSA submitted a second petition for waiver
and interim waiver for a substantially similar hybrid model, SR5180JBC,
that shares the same design characteristics that led DOE to approve
PAPRSA's June 2, 2011 waiver request. No comments were filed opposing
the relief requested in PAPRSA's second petition for waiver and interim
waiver. On September 17, 2013, DOE again granted PAPRSA a waiver from
DOE's electric refrigerator and refrigerator-freezer test procedures
[[Page 55772]]
for determining the energy consumption of basic hybrid model SR5180JBC.
See Federal Register, Vol. 78, No. 180, 57139-41.
2. Request to Extend Scope of Previously Granted Waivers and Interim
Waivers to New Basic Hybrid Model under Previously Approved Alternative
Testing Procedure
As indicated above, PAPRSA has developed a new basic hybrid model,
PR5180JKBC, that shares the same design characteristics that led DOE to
approve PAPRSA's two prior petitions for waiver. This new basic hybrid
model is a single cabinet hybrid model that would be classified as a
compact refrigerator with automatic defrost without through-the-door
ice service, but which has a wine-chiller compartment designed for an
average temperature of 55 to 57 [deg]F. Just as PAPRSA's waiver hybrid
models, this new basic hybrid model contains a heater that makes it
impossible for the temperature of the wine-chiller compartment to reach
a temperature below 45 [deg]F. Thus, testing this new hybrid model at
39 [deg]F is simply not possible and not representative of the energy
consumption characteristics of this new basic hybrid model.
Further, this new basic hybrid model, just as PAPRSA's waiver
hybrid models, will have a door-opening usage aligned with household
freezers, thus 0.85 should also be the employed K factor (correction
factor) for this basic hybrid model. See Appendix B1 to Subpart 430,
5.2.1.1, because Subpart 430 does not recognize wine chiller as a
category.
In short, there are no material differences between this new basic
hybrid model and PAPRSA's waiver hybrid models as it impacts this
Request. The design differences between the new basic hybrid model and
the waiver hybrid models are the introduction of a more efficient
compressor and new external electronic controls. Although the new basic
hybrid model will be more energy efficient, the design characteristics
of the new basic hybrid model are the same as the characteristics of
PAPRSA's waiver hybrid models that led DOE to grant the prior two
waivers. Accordingly, PAPRSA respectfully requests that it be permitted
to use the following testing procedure for its new basic hybrid model:
Energy consumption is defined by the higher of the two values
calculated by the following two formulas (according to 10 CFR part 430,
subpart B, Appendix A):
Energy consumption of the wine compartment:
EWine = (ET1 + [(ET2-ET1) x (55 [deg]F-TW1)/(TW2-TW1)]) *0.85
Energy consumption of the refrigerated beverage compartment:
EBeverage Compartment = ET1 + [(ET2-ET1) x (39 [deg]F-TBC1)/(TBC2-
TBC1)].\3\
\3\ As a result of electing to utilize Appendix A to Subpart B
of Part 430 prior to the September 15, 2014 effective date to
measure the energy consumption of its new basic hybrid model,
testing of the refrigerated beverage compartment will be conducted
at 39 [deg]F as specified in Appendix A, as opposed to 38 [deg]F as
specified in Appendix A1 and under which PAPRSA's waiver hybrid
models were previously certified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, PAPRSA respectfully requests that DOE extend the
waivers that DOE previously granted it and that PAPRSA be permitted to
use this approved alternative testing method to test, certify and rate
the new basic hybrid models in the same manner as its waiver hybrid
models subject to the existing waivers.
3. Grounds for Interim Waiver
Pursuant to 10 CFR part 430.27(b)(2), applicants for an interim
waiver should address the likely success of their petition and what
economic hardships and/or competitive disadvantages are likely to arise
absent the grant of an interim waiver.
As detailed above, it is highly likely that DOE will grant this
Request, as PAPRSA is simply seeking to test a new basic hybrid model
under the alternative testing procedure already approved twice by DOE
for PAPRSA's other hybrid models subject to the existing waivers. The
new basic hybrid models contain no materially different design
characteristics that should warrant a different result.
Further, as DOE has previously stated, ``[f]ully recognizing that
product development occurs faster than the test procedure rulemaking
process, the Department's rules permit manufacturers of models not
contemplated by the test procedures . . . to petition for a test
procedure waiver in order to certify, rate, and sell such models.'' GC
Enforcement Guidance on the Application of Waivers and on the Waiver
Process at 2 (rel. Dec. 23, 2010); \4\ see also DOE FAQ Guidance
Regarding Coverage of Wine Chillers, Etc. in the R/F Standard/Test
Procedure at 2 (rel. Feb. 10, 2011) (``DOE recognizes the potential
disparity in treatment among these hybrid products. As DOE indicated .
. . , the Department plans to engage in a future rulemaking to more
comprehensively address these types of products.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Available at https://www.gc.energy.gov/documents/
LargeCapacityRCWguidance122210.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certain manufacturers design comparable hybrid models so that the
beverage center compartment does not reach below 40 [deg]F, and thus
are not covered products under DOE's regulations. Unless PAPRSA is
granted an interim waiver, it will be at a competitive disadvantage by
being unable to introduce the new basic hybrid model to compete with
manufacturers that design their hybrid models in a manner that falls
outside of DOE's jurisdiction.
Thus, given that this Request is likely to be granted and PAPRSA
will face economic hardship unless an interim waiver is granted,
permitting PAPRSA to immediately certify the new basic hybrid model
under the alternative testing method already approved by DOE is in the
public interest.
Respectfully submitted,
Alan G. Fishel
Adam D. Bowser
Arent Fox LLP, 1717 K St. NW., Washington, DC 20036-5369, (202) 857-
6450, fishel.alan@arentfox.com, bowser.adam@arentfox.com, Counsel
for Panasonic Appliances Refrigeration Systems Corporation of
America
July 2, 2014
[FR Doc. 2014-22175 Filed 9-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P