Butanedioic Acid, 2-methylene-, Polymer With 2,5-fuandione, Sodium and Ammonium Salts, Hydrogen Peroxide-Initiated; Tolerance Exemption, 55653-55656 [2014-22159]
Download as PDF
55653
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
ARIZONA–1997 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS—Continued
[Primary and Secondary]
Designation a
Category/
classification
Designated area
Date 1
T1N, R1E (except that portion in Indian Country); T1N, R2E; T1N, R3E;
T1N, R4E; T1N, R5E; T1N, R6E; T1N, R7E; T1N, R1W; T1N, R2W; T1N,
R3W; T1N, R4W; T1N, R5W; T1N, R6W; T2N, R1E; T2N, R2E; T2N,
R3E; T2N, R4E; T2N, R5E, T2N, R6E; T2N, R7E; T2N, R8E; T2N, R9E;
T2N, R10E; T2N, R11E; T2N, R12E (except that portion in Gila County);
T2N, R13E (except that portion in Gila County); T2N, R1W; T2N, R2W;
T2N, R3W; T2N, R4W; T2N, R5W; T2N, R6W; T2N, R7W; T3N, R1E;
T3N, R2E; T3N, R3E; T3N, R4E; T3N, R5E; T3N, R6E; T3N, R7E; T3N,
R8E; T3N, R9E; T3N, R10E (except that portion in Gila County); T3N,
R11E (except that portion in Gila County); T3N, R12E (except that portion
in Gila County); T3N, R1W; T3N, R2W; T3N, R3W; T3N, R4W; T3N,
R5W; T3N, R6W; T4N, R1E; T4N, R2E; T4N, R3E; T4N, R4E; T4N, R5E;
T4N, R6E; T4N, R7E; T4N, R8E; T4N, R9E; T4N, R10E (except that portion in Gila County); T4N, R11E (except that portion in Gila County); T4N,
R12E (except that portion in Gila County); T4N, R1W; T4N, R2W; T4N,
R3W; T4N, R4W; T4N, R5W; T4N, R6W; T5N, R1E; T5N, R2E; T5N,
R3E; T5N, R4E; T5N, R5E; T5N, R6E; T5N, R7E; T5N, R8E; T5N, R9E
(except that portion in Gila County); T5N, R10E (except that portion in
Gila County); T5N, R1W; T5N, R2W; T5N, R3W; T5N, R4W; T5N, R5W;
T6N, R1E (except that portion in Yavapai County); T6N, R2E; T6N, R3E;
T6N, R4E; T6N, R5E; T6N, R6E; T6N, R7E; T6N, R8E; T6N, R9E (except
that portion in Gila County); T6N, R10E (except that portion in Gila County); T6N, R1W (except that portion in Yavapai County); T6N, R2W; T6N,
R3W; T6N, R4W; T6N, R5W; T7N, R1E (except that portion in Yavapai
County); T7N, R2E; (except that portion in Yavapai County); T7N, R3E;
T7N, R4E; T7N, R5E; T7N, R6E; T7N, R7E; T7N, R8E; T7N, R9E (except
that portion in Gila County); T7N, R1W (except that portion in Yavapai
County); T7N, R2W (except that portion in Yavapai County); T8N, R2E
(except that portion in Yavapai County); T8N, R3E (except that portion in
Yavapai County); T8N, R4E (except that portion in Yavapai County); T8N,
R5E (except that portion in Yavapai County); T8N, R6E (except that portion in Yavapai County); T8N, R7E (except that portion in Yavapai County); T8N, R8E (except that portion in Yavapai and Gila Counties); T8N,
R9E (except that portion in Yavapai and Gila Counties); T1S, R1E (except
that portion in Indian Country); T1S, R2E (except that portion in Pinal
County and in Indian Country); T1S, R3E; T1S, R4E; T1S, R5E; T1S,
R6E; T1S, R7E; T1S, R1W; T1S, R2W; T1S, R3W; T1S, R4W; T1S,
R5W; T1S, R6W; T2S, R1E (except that portion in Indian Country); T2S,
R5E; T2S, R6E; T2S, R7E; T2S, R1W; T2S, R2W; T2S, R3W; T2S, R4W;
T2S, R5W; T3S, R1E; T3S, R1W; T3S, R2W; T3S, R3W; T3S, R4W;
T3S, R5W; T4S, 1E; T4S, R1W; T4S, R2W; T4S, R3W; T4S, R4W; T4S,
R5W.
Pinal County (part) ...................................................................................................
Apache Junction: T1N, R8E; T1S, R8E (Sections 1 through 12)
*
*
*
10/17/2014
*
Date 1
Type
Type
Attainment.
*
*
*
a Includes
Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified.
1 This date is June 15, 2004, unless otherwise noted.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–22029 Filed 9–16–14; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
40 CFR Part 180
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0324; FRL–9915–81]
Butanedioic Acid, 2-methylene-,
Polymer With 2,5-fuandione, Sodium
and Ammonium Salts, Hydrogen
Peroxide-Initiated; Tolerance
Exemption
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Sep 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of butanedioic
acid, 2-methylene-, polymer with 2,5furandione, sodium and ammonium
salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated when
used as an inert ingredient in a pesticide
formulation. Technology Sciences
Group Inc. on behalf of Specialty
Fertilizer Products LLC. submitted a
petition to EPA under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
requesting an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
55654
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of butanedioic acid, 2methylene-, polymer with 2,5furandione, sodium and ammonium
salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated on
food or feed commodities.
This regulation is effective
September 17, 2014. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before November 17, 2014, and
must be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
DATES:
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0324, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
Lois
Rossi, Registration Division (7505P),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
16:27 Sep 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
C. Can I file an objection or hearing
request?
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2014–0324 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before November 17, 2014. Addresses
for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2014–0324, by one of the following
methods.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of August 1,
2014 (79 FR 44729) (FRL–9911–67),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a,
announcing the receipt of a pesticide
petition (IN–10697) filed by Specialty
Fertilizer Products LLC., 11550 Ash,
Suite 220, Leawood, KS 66211. The
petition requested that 40 CFR 180.960
be amended by establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of butanedioic
acid, 2-methylene-, polymer with 2,5furandione, sodium (CAS Reg. No.
556055–76–6) and ammonium (CAS
Reg. No. 701908–99–8) salts, hydrogen
peroxide-initiated. That document
included a summary of the petition
prepared by the petitioner and solicited
comments on the petitioner’s request.
The Agency did not receive any
comments.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and
use in residential settings, but does not
include occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue . . .’’ and specifies
factors EPA is to consider in
establishing an exemption.
III. Risk Assessment and Statutory
Findings
EPA establishes exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance only in those
cases where it can be shown that the
risks from aggregate exposure to
pesticide chemical residues under
reasonably foreseeable circumstances
will pose no appreciable risks to human
health. In order to determine the risks
from aggregate exposure to pesticide
inert ingredients, the Agency considers
the toxicity of the inert in conjunction
with possible exposure to residues of
the inert ingredient through food,
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
drinking water, and through other
exposures that occur as a result of
pesticide use in residential settings. If
EPA is able to determine that a finite
tolerance is not necessary to ensure that
there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the inert ingredient, an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance may be established.
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other
relevant information in support of this
action and considered its validity,
completeness and reliability and the
relationship of this information to
human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the
variability of the sensitivities of major
identifiable subgroups of consumers,
including infants and children. In the
case of certain chemical substances that
are defined as polymers, the Agency has
established a set of criteria to identify
categories of polymers expected to
present minimal or no risk. The
definition of a polymer is given in 40
CFR 723.250(b) and the exclusion
criteria for identifying these low-risk
polymers are described in 40 CFR
723.250(d). Butanedioic acid, 2methylene-, polymer with 2,5furandione, sodium and ammonium
salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated
conforms to the definition of a polymer
given in 40 CFR 723.250(b) and meets
the following criteria that are used to
identify low-risk polymers.
1. The polymer is not a cationic
polymer nor is it reasonably anticipated
to become a cationic polymer in a
natural aquatic environment.
2. The polymer does contain as an
integral part of its composition the
atomic elements carbon, hydrogen, and
oxygen.
3. The polymer does not contain as an
integral part of its composition, except
as impurities, any element other than
those listed in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(2)(ii).
4. The polymer is neither designed
nor can it be reasonably anticipated to
substantially degrade, decompose, or
depolymerize.
5. The polymer is manufactured or
imported from monomers and/or
reactants that are already included on
the TSCA Chemical Substance
Inventory or manufactured under an
applicable TSCA section 5 exemption.
6. The polymer is not a water
absorbing polymer with a number
average molecular weight (MW) greater
than or equal to 10,000 daltons.
7. The polymer does not contain
certain perfluoroalkyl moieties
consisting of a CF3- or longer chain
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Sep 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
length as specified in 40 CFR
723.250(d)(6).
Additionally, the polymer also meets
as required the following exemption
criteria specified in 40 CFR 723.250(e).
8. The polymer’s number average MW
of 2,500 to 3,000 is greater than 1,000
and less than 10,000 daltons. The
polymer contains less than 10%
oligomeric material below MW 500 and
less than 25% oligomeric material
below MW 1,000, and the polymer does
not contain any reactive functional
groups.
Thus, butanedioic acid, 2methylene-, polymer with 2,5furandione, sodium and ammonium
salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated meets
the criteria for a polymer to be
considered low risk under 40 CFR
723.250. Based on its conformance to
the criteria in this unit, no mammalian
toxicity is anticipated from dietary,
inhalation, or dermal exposure to
butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-, polymer
with 2,5-furandione, sodium and
ammonium salts, hydrogen peroxideinitiated.
IV. Aggregate Exposures
For the purposes of assessing
potential exposure under this
exemption, EPA considered that
butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-, polymer
with 2,5-furandione, sodium and
ammonium salts, hydrogen peroxideinitiated could be present in all raw and
processed agricultural commodities and
drinking water, and that nonoccupational non-dietary exposure was
possible. The number average MW of
butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-, polymer
with 2,5-furandione, sodium and
ammonium salts, hydrogen peroxideinitiated is 2,500 to 3,000 daltons.
Generally, a polymer of this size would
be poorly absorbed through the intact
gastrointestinal tract or through intact
human skin. Since butanedioic acid, 2methylene-, polymer with 2,5furandione, sodium and ammonium
salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated
conform to the criteria that identify a
low-risk polymer, there are no concerns
for risks associated with any potential
exposure scenarios that are reasonably
foreseeable. The Agency has determined
that a tolerance is not necessary to
protect the public health.
V. Cumulative Effects From Substances
With a Common Mechanism of Toxicity
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55655
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA has not found butanedioic acid,
2-methylene-, polymer with 2,5furandione, sodium and ammonium
salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated to
share a common mechanism of toxicity
with any other substances, and
butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-, polymer
with 2,5-furandione, sodium and
ammonium salts, hydrogen peroxideinitiated does not appear to produce a
toxic metabolite produced by other
substances. For the purposes of this
tolerance action, therefore, EPA has
assumed that butanedioic acid, 2methylene-, polymer with 2,5furandione, sodium and ammonium
salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated does
not have a common mechanism of
toxicity with other substances. For
information regarding EPA’s efforts to
determine which chemicals have a
common mechanism of toxicity and to
evaluate the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see EPA’s Web site at
https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/
cumulative.
VI. Additional Safety Factor for the
Protection of Infants and Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA
provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold margin of safety for
infants and children in the case of
threshold effects to account for prenatal
and postnatal toxicity and the
completeness of the database unless
EPA concludes that a different margin of
safety will be safe for infants and
children. Due to the expected low
toxicity of butanedioic acid, 2methylene-, polymer with 2,5furandione, sodium and ammonium
salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated, EPA
has not used a safety factor analysis to
assess the risk. For the same reasons the
additional tenfold safety factor is
unnecessary.
VII. Determination of Safety
Based on the conformance to the
criteria used to identify a low-risk
polymer, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty of no harm to the
U.S. population, including infants and
children, from aggregate exposure to
residues of butanedioic acid, 2methylene-, polymer with 2,5furandione, sodium and ammonium
salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated.
VIII. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes since the
Agency is establishing an exemption
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
55656
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
from the requirement of a tolerance
without any numerical limitation.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint
United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health
Organization food standards program,
and it is recognized as an international
food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to
which the United States is a party. EPA
may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established a MRL
for butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-,
polymer with 2,5-furandione, sodium
and ammonium salts, hydrogen
peroxide-initiated.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
IX. Conclusion
Accordingly, EPA finds that
exempting residues of butanedioic acid,
2-methylene-, polymer with 2,5furandione, sodium and ammonium
salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated from
the requirement of a tolerance will be
safe.
X. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these rules
from review under Executive Order
12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning
and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993). Because this final rule has been
exempted from review under Executive
Order 12866, this final rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This final rule does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it involve
any technical standards that would
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Sep 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
require Agency consideration of
voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272
note).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or otherwise have any unique
impacts on local governments. Thus, the
Agency has determined that Executive
Order 13132, entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and
Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this final rule. In addition, this final
rule does not impose any enforceable
duty or contain any unfunded mandate
as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
Although this action does not require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994), EPA seeks to achieve
environmental justice, the fair treatment
and meaningful involvement of any
group, including minority and/or lowincome populations, in the
development, implementation, and
enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies. As such, to the
extent that information is publicly
available or was submitted in comments
to EPA, the Agency considered whether
groups or segments of the population, as
a result of their location, cultural
practices, or other factors, may have
atypical or disproportionately high and
adverse human health impacts or
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
environmental effects from exposure to
the pesticide discussed in this
document, compared to the general
population.
XI. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: September 10, 2014.
G. Jeffrey Herndon,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.960, add alphabetically to
the table after ‘‘Butadiene-styrene
copolymer’’ the following entry to read
as follows:
■
§ 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance.
*
*
*
*
*
Polymer
*
*
CAS No.
*
Butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-, polymer with 2,5furandione, sodium and
ammonium salts, hydrogen
peroxide-initiated, minimum number average molecular weight (in amu),
2,500–3,000 ......................
*
*
*
*
556055–76–6
701908–99–8
*
[FR Doc. 2014–22159 Filed 9–16–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
*
*
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55653-55656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22159]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0324; FRL-9915-81]
Butanedioic Acid, 2-methylene-, Polymer With 2,5-fuandione,
Sodium and Ammonium Salts, Hydrogen Peroxide-Initiated; Tolerance
Exemption
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-, polymer
with 2,5-furandione, sodium and ammonium salts, hydrogen peroxide-
initiated when used as an inert ingredient in a pesticide formulation.
Technology Sciences Group Inc. on behalf of Specialty Fertilizer
Products LLC. submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) requesting an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to
[[Page 55654]]
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of butanedioic acid,
2-methylene-, polymer with 2,5-furandione, sodium and ammonium salts,
hydrogen peroxide-initiated on food or feed commodities.
DATES: This regulation is effective September 17, 2014. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before November 17, 2014,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0324, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois Rossi, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305-7090; email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://
ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab02.tpl.
C. Can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0324 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
November 17, 2014. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0324, by one of
the following methods.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of August 1, 2014 (79 FR 44729) (FRL-9911-
67), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C.
346a, announcing the receipt of a pesticide petition (IN-10697) filed
by Specialty Fertilizer Products LLC., 11550 Ash, Suite 220, Leawood,
KS 66211. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.960 be amended by
establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-, polymer with 2,5-
furandione, sodium (CAS Reg. No. 556055-76-6) and ammonium (CAS Reg.
No. 701908-99-8) salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated. That document
included a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner and
solicited comments on the petitioner's request. The Agency did not
receive any comments.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and use in residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue . . .'' and
specifies factors EPA is to consider in establishing an exemption.
III. Risk Assessment and Statutory Findings
EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only
in those cases where it can be shown that the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably foreseeable
circumstances will pose no appreciable risks to human health. In order
to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide inert
ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the inert in
conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert ingredient
through food,
[[Page 55655]]
drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as a result of
pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA is able to determine that
a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance may be established.
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability
and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children. In the case of certain chemical substances that
are defined as polymers, the Agency has established a set of criteria
to identify categories of polymers expected to present minimal or no
risk. The definition of a polymer is given in 40 CFR 723.250(b) and the
exclusion criteria for identifying these low-risk polymers are
described in 40 CFR 723.250(d). Butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-, polymer
with 2,5-furandione, sodium and ammonium salts, hydrogen peroxide-
initiated conforms to the definition of a polymer given in 40 CFR
723.250(b) and meets the following criteria that are used to identify
low-risk polymers.
1. The polymer is not a cationic polymer nor is it reasonably
anticipated to become a cationic polymer in a natural aquatic
environment.
2. The polymer does contain as an integral part of its composition
the atomic elements carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen.
3. The polymer does not contain as an integral part of its
composition, except as impurities, any element other than those listed
in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(2)(ii).
4. The polymer is neither designed nor can it be reasonably
anticipated to substantially degrade, decompose, or depolymerize.
5. The polymer is manufactured or imported from monomers and/or
reactants that are already included on the TSCA Chemical Substance
Inventory or manufactured under an applicable TSCA section 5 exemption.
6. The polymer is not a water absorbing polymer with a number
average molecular weight (MW) greater than or equal to 10,000 daltons.
7. The polymer does not contain certain perfluoroalkyl moieties
consisting of a CF3- or longer chain length as specified in 40 CFR
723.250(d)(6).
Additionally, the polymer also meets as required the following
exemption criteria specified in 40 CFR 723.250(e).
8. The polymer's number average MW of 2,500 to 3,000 is greater
than 1,000 and less than 10,000 daltons. The polymer contains less than
10% oligomeric material below MW 500 and less than 25% oligomeric
material below MW 1,000, and the polymer does not contain any reactive
functional groups.
Thus, butanedioic acid, 2- methylene-, polymer with 2,5-furandione,
sodium and ammonium salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated meets the
criteria for a polymer to be considered low risk under 40 CFR 723.250.
Based on its conformance to the criteria in this unit, no mammalian
toxicity is anticipated from dietary, inhalation, or dermal exposure to
butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-, polymer with 2,5-furandione, sodium and
ammonium salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated.
IV. Aggregate Exposures
For the purposes of assessing potential exposure under this
exemption, EPA considered that butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-, polymer
with 2,5-furandione, sodium and ammonium salts, hydrogen peroxide-
initiated could be present in all raw and processed agricultural
commodities and drinking water, and that non-occupational non-dietary
exposure was possible. The number average MW of butanedioic acid, 2-
methylene-, polymer with 2,5-furandione, sodium and ammonium salts,
hydrogen peroxide-initiated is 2,500 to 3,000 daltons. Generally, a
polymer of this size would be poorly absorbed through the intact
gastrointestinal tract or through intact human skin. Since butanedioic
acid, 2-methylene-, polymer with 2,5-furandione, sodium and ammonium
salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated conform to the criteria that
identify a low-risk polymer, there are no concerns for risks associated
with any potential exposure scenarios that are reasonably foreseeable.
The Agency has determined that a tolerance is not necessary to protect
the public health.
V. Cumulative Effects From Substances With a Common Mechanism of
Toxicity
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering
whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency
consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of
a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a
common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA has not found butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-, polymer with 2,5-
furandione, sodium and ammonium salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated to
share a common mechanism of toxicity with any other substances, and
butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-, polymer with 2,5-furandione, sodium and
ammonium salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated does not appear to produce
a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of
this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has assumed that butanedioic
acid, 2-methylene-, polymer with 2,5-furandione, sodium and ammonium
salts, hydrogen peroxide-initiated does not have a common mechanism of
toxicity with other substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts
to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to
evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's Web site
at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
VI. Additional Safety Factor for the Protection of Infants and Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold margin of safety for infants and children in the
case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the database unless EPA concludes that
a different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. Due
to the expected low toxicity of butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-, polymer
with 2,5-furandione, sodium and ammonium salts, hydrogen peroxide-
initiated, EPA has not used a safety factor analysis to assess the
risk. For the same reasons the additional tenfold safety factor is
unnecessary.
VII. Determination of Safety
Based on the conformance to the criteria used to identify a low-
risk polymer, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty of no
harm to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from
aggregate exposure to residues of butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-,
polymer with 2,5-furandione, sodium and ammonium salts, hydrogen
peroxide-initiated.
VIII. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is establishing an exemption
[[Page 55656]]
from the requirement of a tolerance without any numerical limitation.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established a MRL for butanedioic acid, 2-
methylene-, polymer with 2,5-furandione, sodium and ammonium salts,
hydrogen peroxide-initiated.
IX. Conclusion
Accordingly, EPA finds that exempting residues of butanedioic acid,
2-methylene-, polymer with 2,5-furandione, sodium and ammonium salts,
hydrogen peroxide-initiated from the requirement of a tolerance will be
safe.
X. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d)
in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these rules from review under
Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this final rule has been exempted
from review under Executive Order 12866, this final rule is not subject
to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997). This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it involve any
technical standards that would require Agency consideration of
voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272
note).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or otherwise have any unique
impacts on local governments. Thus, the Agency has determined that
Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000) do not apply to this final rule. In addition, this final rule
does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
Although this action does not require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994), EPA seeks to achieve
environmental justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of
any group, including minority and/or low-income populations, in the
development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies. As such, to the extent that information is
publicly available or was submitted in comments to EPA, the Agency
considered whether groups or segments of the population, as a result of
their location, cultural practices, or other factors, may have atypical
or disproportionately high and adverse human health impacts or
environmental effects from exposure to the pesticide discussed in this
document, compared to the general population.
XI. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: September 10, 2014.
G. Jeffrey Herndon,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.960, add alphabetically to the table after ``Butadiene-
styrene copolymer'' the following entry to read as follows:
Sec. [emsp14]180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Polymer CAS No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Butanedioic acid, 2-methylene-, polymer with 2,5- 556055-76-6
furandione, sodium and ammonium salts, hydrogen 701908-99-8
peroxide-initiated, minimum number average molecular
weight (in amu), 2,500-3,000...........................
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2014-22159 Filed 9-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P