Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Airplanes, 55675-55679 [2014-22149]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc.
airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1),
(c)(2), and (c)(3) of this AD, certificated in
any category.
(1) Model CL–600–2A12 (CL–601)
airplanes, serial numbers 3001 through 3066
inclusive.
(2) Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–601–3A, CL–
601–3R Variants) airplanes, serial numbers
5001 through 5194 inclusive.
(3) Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–604 Variant)
airplanes, serial numbers 5301 through 5665
inclusive, and 5701 through 5934 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 24, Electrical Power.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report of an
aft equipment bay fire due to chafing and
subsequent arcing of the integrated drive
generator (IDG) power cables. Additionally,
we have received several reports of broken
support brackets of the hydraulic lines. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct
broken support brackets of the hydraulic
lines, which could result in inadequate
clearance between the IDG power cables and
hydraulic lines and chafing of the IDG power
cables, and consequent high energy arcing
and an uncontrolled fire in the aft equipment
bay.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) One-Time Inspection and Corrective
Actions
Within 400 flight hours or 18 months after
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first: Perform a one-time detailed
inspection of the IDG power cables for
chafing between the cables and the adjacent
hydraulic and pneumatic lines, and for any
cracked or broken support bracket of the
hydraulic lines, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service information identified in
paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD.
If any chafing of the power cables or any
cracked or broken support bracket is found,
before further flight, repair or replace, as
applicable, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service information identified in
paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD.
(1) Bombardier Service Bulletin 605–24–
007, Revision 01, dated January 13, 2014 (for
Model CL–600–2B16 airplanes).
(2) Bombardier Service Bulletin 604–24–
026, Revision 01, dated January 13, 2014 (for
Model CL–600–2B16 airplanes).
(3) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601–0625,
Revision 01, dated January 13, 2014 (for
Model Cl-600–2A12 and CL–600–2B16
airplanes).
(h) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for action
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Sep 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
55675
action was performed before the effective
date of this AD using Bombardier Service
Bulletin 605–24–007, 604–24–026, or 601–
0625, all dated September 18, 2012, provided
that the action specified in Service Request
for Product Support Action (SRPSA) 27512,
SRPSA 30806, SRPSA 32727, SRPSA 32864,
or SRPSA 33161 has not been done.
Bombardier Service Bulletins 605–24–007,
604–24–026, and 601–0625, all dated
September 18, 2012, are not incorporated by
reference in this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 9, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
14 CFR Part 39
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN:
Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), or
Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO,
the approval must include the DAOauthorized signature.
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2014–05, dated
January 20, 2014, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating it in Docket No.
FAA–2014–0625.
(2) For service information identified in
ˆ
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 Cote
´
Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514–
855–7401; email thd.crj@
aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://
www.bombardier.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[FR Doc. 2014–22151 Filed 9–16–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0627; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–217–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed
Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2011–09–
03, which applies to all Lockheed
Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Model 382, 382B,
382E, 382F, and 382G airplanes. AD
2011–09–03 currently requires
repetitive eddy current inspections to
detect cracks in the center wing upper
and lower rainbow fittings, and
corrective actions if necessary; and
repetitive replacement of rainbow
fittings, which would extend the
repetitive interval for the next
inspection. Since we issued AD 2011–
09–03, analysis of in-service cracking
has shown that a reduction in the
inspection intervals is necessary for the
upper rainbow fittings. This proposed
AD is intended to complete certain
mandated programs intended to support
the airplane reaching its limit of validity
(LOV) of the engineering data that
support the established structural
maintenance program. This proposed
AD would require reduced intervals for
inspections of the upper rainbow
fittings. We are proposing this AD to
detect and correct fatigue cracking of the
upper and lower rainbow fittings on the
center wings, which could grow large
and lead to the failure of the fitting and
a catastrophic failure of the center wing.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 3, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17SEP1.SGM
17SEP1
55676
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Lockheed
Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company, Airworthiness
Office, Dept. 6A0M, Zone 0252, Column
P–58, 86 S. Cobb Drive, Marietta, GA
30063; telephone 770–494–5444; fax
770–494–5445; email ams.portal@
lmco.com; Internet https://
www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/
TechPubs.html. You may view this
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton
Washington 98057. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
0627; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
Gray, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ACE–117A, FAA, Atlanta
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337; phone: 404–474–5554; fax: 404–
474–5606; email: carl.w.gray@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Sep 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
FAA–2014–0627; Directorate Identifier
2013–NM–217–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On April 12, 2011, we issued AD
2011–09–03, Amendment 39–16665 (76
FR 22311, April 21, 2011), for all
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Model
382, 382B, 382E, 382F, and 382G
airplanes. AD 2011–09–03 requires
repetitive eddy current inspections to
detect cracks in the center wing upper
and lower rainbow fittings, and
corrective actions if necessary; and
repetitive replacements of rainbow
fittings, which would extend the
repetitive interval for the next
inspection. AD 2011–09–03 resulted
from reports of fatigue cracking of the
wing upper and lower rainbow fittings
during durability testing and on inservice airplanes. Analysis of in-service
cracking has shown that these rainbow
fittings are susceptible to multiple site
fatigue damage. We issued AD 2011–09–
03 to detect and correct such fatigue
cracks, which could grow large and lead
to the failure of the fitting and a
catastrophic failure of the center wing.
Actions Since AD 2011–09–03,
Amendment 39–16665 (76 FR 22311,
April 21, 2011), Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2011–09–03,
Amendment 39–16665 (76 FR 22311,
April 21, 2011), analysis of in-service
cracking has shown that the initial and
repetitive inspection schedules for the
upper rainbow fitting need to be revised
to reduce the probability of failure until
the rainbow fitting is replaced.
We have also revised paragraphs (i)
and (k) of AD 2011–09–03, Amendment
39–16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011)
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to clarify the rainbow fitting is replaced
with a new rainbow fitting, as specified
in Lockheed Service Bulletin 382–57–
82, Revision 4, including Appendixes A
and B, dated May 20, 2009; and
Lockheed Service Bulletin 382–57–82,
including Appendices A and B,
Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Lockheed Service
Bulletin 382–57–82, including
Appendices A, B, and C, Revision 6,
dated July 11, 2013. The compliance
times are reduced, but the procedures
are unchanged from those described in
Lockheed Service Bulletin 382–57–82,
including Appendices A, B, and C,
dated April 25, 2008.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain all of
the requirements of AD 2011–09–03,
Amendment 39–16665 (76 FR 22311,
April 21, 2011). This proposed AD
would reduce compliance times for
initial and repetitive inspections of the
upper rainbow fitting.
We have clarified the replacement
process to more closely match the intent
of the service information to replace
affected fittings with new replacement
fittings.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the Service Information
Where Lockheed Service Bulletin
382–57–82, including Appendices A, B,
and C, Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013,
does not specify a corrective action or
states ‘‘taking appropriate corrective
action,’’ this NPRM proposes to require
repairing those conditions using a
method approved by the Manager,
Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 14 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
E:\FR\FM\17SEP1.SGM
17SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
55677
ESTIMATED COSTS
Parts cost
Cost per product
Cost on U.S.
operators
Action
Labor cost
Inspection of upper and lower fitting [retained actions from AD 2011-09-03,
Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311,
April 21, 2011)].
Fitting replacement [retained actions from
AD 2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665
(76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011)].
20 work-hours × $85 per hour =
$1,700 per inspection cycle.
( 1)
$1,700, per inspection
cycle.
$23,800, per inspection cycle.
2,438 work-hours × $85 per hour
= $207,230 per replacement.
$40,000
$247,230, per replacement.
$3,461,220, per
replacement.
(1) None.
This proposed AD reduces the
compliance times for the upper rainbow
fitting inspections and adds no
additional economic burden.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Sep 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
center wings, which could grow large and
lead to the failure of the fitting and a
catastrophic failure of the center wing.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Amend § 39.13 by removing
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2011–09–
03, Amendment 39–16665 (76 FR
22311, April 21, 2011), and adding the
following new AD:
■
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company: Docket
No. FAA–2014–0627; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–217–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
AD action by November 3, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2011–09–03,
Amendment 39–16665 (76 FR 22311, April
21, 2011.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Company Model 382, 382B, 382E, 382F, and
382G airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57, Wings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by an analysis of
in-service cracking that has shown that the
rainbow fittings are susceptible to multiple
site fatigue damage. We are issuing this AD
to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the
upper and lower rainbow fittings on the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(g) Retained Initial Inspections
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (g) of AD 2011–09–03,
Amendment 39–16665 (76 FR 22311, April
21, 2011), with revised service information.
Except as required by paragraph (m) of this
AD, at the later of the times specified in
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD: Do
eddy current inspections to detect cracking of
the center wing upper and lower rainbow
fittings on the left and right side of the
airplane. Do the actions in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of
Lockheed Service Bulletin 382–57–82,
Revision 4, including Appendixes A and B,
dated May 20, 2009; or Lockheed Service
Bulletin 382–57–82, including Appendices A
and B, Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013. If any
crack is found during the inspections
required by this paragraph, before further
flight, do the actions required by paragraph
(k) of this AD. Doing the requirements of
paragraph (m) of this AD terminates the
requirements of this paragraph for the
affected upper rainbow fitting only. As of the
effective date of this AD, only use Lockheed
Service Bulletin 382–57–82, including
Appendices A and B, Revision 6, dated July
11, 2013, for accomplishing the actions
specified in this paragraph.
(1) Before the accumulation of 15,000 total
flight hours on the rainbow fitting.
(2) Within 365 days or 600 flight hours on
the rainbow fitting after May 26, 2011, (the
effective date of AD 2011–09–03,
Amendment 39–16665 (76 FR 22311, April
21, 2011)), whichever occurs first.
(h) Retained Repetitive Inspection Schedule
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (h) of AD 2011–09–03,
Amendment 39–16665 (76 FR 22311, April
21, 2011), with a new exception. Except as
required by paragraph (n) of this AD, repeat
the inspection required by paragraph (g) of
this AD at intervals not to exceed 3,600 flight
hours on the center wing, until the rainbow
fitting has accumulated 30,000 total flight
hours. If any crack is found during the
inspections required by paragraph (h) of this
AD, before further flight, do the actions
required by paragraph (k) of this AD. Doing
E:\FR\FM\17SEP1.SGM
17SEP1
55678
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
the requirements of paragraph (n) of this AD
terminates the requirements of this paragraph
for the affected upper rainbow fitting only.
(i) Retained Rainbow Fitting Replacements
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (i) of AD 2011–09–03, Amendment
39–16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), with
revised service information. Before the
accumulation of 30,000 flight hours on the
rainbow fitting, or within 600 flight hours
after May 26, 2011, (the effective date of AD
2011–09–03, Amendment 39–16665 (76 FR
22311, April 21, 2011)), whichever occurs
later: Replace the rainbow fitting with a new
rainbow fitting, do all related investigative
actions, and do all applicable corrective
actions, in accordance with paragraph 2.C. of
the Accomplishment Instructions of
Lockheed Service Bulletin 382–57–82,
Revision 4, including Appendix C, dated
May 20, 2009, except as required by
paragraph (l) of this AD; or Lockheed Service
Bulletin 382–57–82, including Appendix C,
Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013, except as
required by paragraph (l) of this AD. Replace
the rainbow fitting thereafter at intervals not
to exceed 30,000 flight hours. As of the
effective date of this AD, only use Lockheed
Service Bulletin 382–57–82, including
Appendix C, Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013,
for accomplishing the actions specified in
this paragraph.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(j) Retained Post-Replacement Repetitive
Inspections
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (j) of AD 2011–09–03, Amendment
39–16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), with
a new exception. For upper and lower
rainbow fittings replaced in accordance with
paragraph (i) or (k) of this AD: Except as
required by paragraph (o) of this AD, do the
eddy current inspections specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD within 15,000 flight
hours after doing the replacement and repeat
the eddy current inspections specified in
paragraph (h) of this AD thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 3,600 flight hours
until the rainbow fittings are replaced in
accordance with paragraph (i) or (k) of this
AD. Doing the requirements of paragraph (o)
of this AD terminates the requirements of this
paragraph for the affected upper rainbow
fitting only.
(k) Retained Replacement, Related
Investigative Actions, and Corrective
Actions
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (k) of AD 2011–09–03,
Amendment 39–16665 (76 FR 22311, April
21, 2011), with revised service information
and revised references to inspection
paragraphs. If, during any inspection
required by paragraph (g), (h), (m), or (n) of
this AD, any crack is detected in the rainbow
fitting, before further flight, replace the
rainbow fitting with a new rainbow fitting,
do all related investigative actions, and do all
applicable corrective actions, in accordance
with Paragraph 2.C. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin
382–57–82, Revision 4, including Appendix
C, dated May 20, 2009, except as provided by
paragraph (l) of this AD; or Lockheed Service
Bulletin 382–57–82, including Appendix C,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Sep 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013, except as
required by paragraph (l) of this AD. As of
the effective date of this AD, only use
Lockheed Service Bulletin 382–57–82,
including Appendix C, Revision 6, dated July
11, 2013, for accomplishing the actions
specified in this paragraph.
(l) Retained Exceptions to Service Bulletin
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (l) of AD 2011–09–03, Amendment
39–16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), with
revised service information. Where Lockheed
Service Bulletin 382–57–82, Revision 4,
including Appendixes A, B, and C, dated
May 20, 2009; or Lockheed Service Bulletin
382–57–82, including Appendices A, B, and
C, Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013; specifies
to contact the manufacturer for disposition of
certain repair conditions or does not specify
corrective actions if certain conditions are
found, this AD requires repairing those
conditions using a method approved by the
Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA. For a repair method to be
approved by the Manager, Atlanta ACO, as
required by this paragraph, the Manager’s
approval letter must specifically refer to this
AD.
(m) New Requirement: Reduced Initial
Compliance Time for Upper Rainbow
Fittings
At the applicable compliance time
specified in paragraphs (m)(1) and (m)(2) of
this AD, do eddy current inspections to
detect cracking of the center wing upper
rainbow fittings on the left and right side of
the airplane. Do the actions in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Lockheed Service Bulletin 382–57–82,
including Appendices A and B, Revision 6,
dated July 11, 2013. If any crack is found
during the inspections required by this
paragraph, before further flight, do the
actions required by paragraph (k) of this AD.
Doing the requirements of this paragraph
terminates the requirements of paragraph (g)
of this AD for that upper rainbow fitting only.
Repeat the inspection at the interval required
by paragraph (n) of this AD.
(1) For upper rainbow fittings that have
accumulated less than 10,000 total flight
hours as of the effective date of this AD, the
compliance time is at the later of the times
in paragraphs (m)(1)(i) and (m)(1)(ii) of this
AD.
(i) Before the accumulation of 10,000 total
flight hours.
(ii) Within 365 days or 600 flight hours
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first.
(2) For upper rainbow fittings that have
accumulated 10,000 total flight hours or
more, but less than 15,000 total flight hours
as of the effective date of this AD, the
compliance time is the earlier of the times
specified in paragraphs (m)(2)(i) and
(m)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Within 365 days or 600 flight hours after
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first.
(ii) Before the accumulation of 15,000 total
flight hours on the rainbow fitting.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(n) New Requirement: Reduced Repetitive
Inspection Intervals
For upper rainbow fittings on which the
requirements of paragraph (g), (h), or (m) of
this AD were done, do the next inspection at
the earlier of the times required in
paragraphs (n)(1) and (n)(2) of this AD.
Thereafter, repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (m) of this AD at intervals not to
exceed 2,500 flight hours until the upper
rainbow fitting has accumulated 30,000 total
flight hours. If any crack is found during the
inspections required by this paragraph,
before further flight, do the actions required
by paragraph (k) of this AD. Doing an
inspection required by this paragraph
terminates the requirements of paragraph (h)
of this AD for the affected upper rainbow
fitting only.
(1) Within 3,600 flight hours since the last
inspection done in accordance with
paragraph (g), (h), or (m) of this AD,
whichever occurs latest.
(2) At the later of the times specified in
paragraphs (n)(2)(i) and (n)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Within 2,500 flight hours after the last
inspection done in accordance with
paragraph (g), (h), or (m) of this AD,
whichever occurs latest.
(ii) Within 365 days or 600 flight hours
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first.
(o) New Requirement: Reduced PostReplacement Repetitive Inspections
For upper rainbow fittings replaced in
accordance with paragraph (i) or (k) of this
AD, do the inspection required by paragraph
(m) of this AD at the earlier of the
compliance times required in paragraph
(o)(1) and (o)(2) of this AD. Repeat the
inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 2,500 flight hours. Doing the
inspections required by this paragraph
terminates the requirements of paragraph (j)
of this AD for the affected upper rainbow
fitting only.
(1) At the later of the times in paragraphs
(o)(1)(i) and (o)(1)(ii) of this AD. (i) Within
10,000 total flight hours on the upper
rainbow fitting.
(ii) Within 365 days or 600 flight hours
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first.
(2) Within 15,000 total flight hours on the
upper rainbow fitting.
(p) Credit for Previous Actions
The service information identified in
paragraphs (p)(1)(i), (p)(1)(ii), (p)(1)(iii),
(p)(2), and (p)(3) is not incorporated by
reference in this AD.
(1) This paragraph provides credit for
actions required by paragraphs (g), (h), (i), (j),
and (k) of this AD, if those actions were
performed before the effective date of this AD
using the service information identified in
paragraphs (p)(1)(i), (p)(1)(ii), and (p)(1)(iii)
of this AD.
(i) Lockheed Service Bulletin 382–57–82,
including Appendices A and B, dated
December 7, 2004.
(ii) Lockheed Service Bulletin 382–57–82,
Revision 1, including Appendices A and B,
dated February 24, 2005.
E:\FR\FM\17SEP1.SGM
17SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(iii) Lockheed Service Bulletin 382–57–82,
Revision 2, including Appendices A and B,
dated February 15, 2007.
(2) This paragraph restates paragraph (m)
of AD 2011–09–03, Amendment 39–16665
(76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011). This
paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraphs (g), (h), (i), (j), and (k)
of this AD, if those actions were performed
before May 26, 2011 (the effective date of AD
2011–09–03), using Lockheed Service
Bulletin 382–57–82, Revision 3, including
Appendixes A, B, and C, dated April 25,
2008.
(3) This paragraph provides credit for
actions required by paragraphs (g), (h), (i), (j),
(k), (m), (n), and (o) of this AD, if those
actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using Lockheed Service
Bulletin 382–57–82, including Appendices
A, B, and C, Revision 5, dated August 12,
2010.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(q) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (r)(2) of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) AMOCs approved for AD 2011–09–03,
Amendment 39–16665 (76 FR 22311, April
21, 2011), are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of this AD.
(r) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Carl Gray, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE–117A, FAA, Atlanta
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337; phone: 404–474–5554; fax: 404–474–
5606; email: carl.w.gray@faa.gov.
(2) For information about AMOCs, contact
Hal Horsbough, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE–117A, FAA, Atlanta
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337; phone: 404–474–5554; fax: 404–474–
5606; email: hal.horsbough@faa.gov.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Company, Airworthiness Office, Dept. 6A0M,
Zone 0252, Column P–58, 86 S. Cobb Drive,
Marietta, GA 30063; telephone 770–494–
5444; fax 770–494–5445; email ams.portal@
lmco.com; Internet https://
www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/
TechPubs.html. You may view this
referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Sep 16, 2014
Jkt 232001
55679
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
September 9, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
Executive Summary
[FR Doc. 2014–22149 Filed 9–16–14; 8:45 am]
I. Purpose
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
This rule is being published to seek
comment on DOD’s updated policy for
support to entertainment-oriented
media productions, including
documentaries. The increased and
higher-level oversight is required to
eliminate inconsistencies and
ambiguities in guidance for and
supervision of DoD activities to ensure
common standards are met in providing
support, and that production support is
appropriate. The rule also includes two
DoD Production Assistance Memoranda
(PAM) as samples. These memoranda
explain the terms under which DoD
provides assistance to production
companies for projects that have been
approved for DoD support.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 238
[Docket ID: DOD–2012–OS–0075]
RIN 0790–AI90
DoD Assistance to Non-Government,
Entertainment-Oriented Media
Productions
Office of the Assistant to the
Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs,
DoD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This rule establishes policy,
assigns responsibilities, and prescribes
procedures for DoD assistance to nonGovernment entertainment media
productions such as feature motion
pictures, episodic television programs,
documentaries, and computer-based
games. This rule provides for oversight
of production assistance decisions at
centralized and senior levels of DoD to
ensure consistency of approach among
DoD and Service components with
respect to support for entertainment
media productions, including
documentaries.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
November 17, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
and title, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
2nd floor, East Tower, Suite 02G09,
Alexandria VA 22350–3100.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Philip M. Strub, (703) 695–2936.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
II. Summary of the Major Provisions of
This Regulatory Action
(a) This rule includes documentaries
within the category of non-government,
entertainment-oriented media
productions and requires approval of
production assistance for such
entertainment-oriented media
productions at the DoD level vice the
Service level.
(b) This rule includes two sample
DoD Production Assistance Memoranda
(PAMs), one for documentary
productions and one for all other
entertainment media productions. This
rule also assigns the authority for
signing both types of agreements to the
Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for
Public Affairs (ATSD(PA)), or the
ATSD(PA)’s designee.
(c) This rule addresses how military
personnel may appear in entertainment
media. This rule requires the written
permission of the Assistant to the
Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs
(or his/her designee) in order for active
duty military personnel to serve as
actors in significant roles and in roles
beyond the scope of their normal duties.
III. Costs and Benefits of This
Regulatory Action
First, the support and assistance to
non-government entertainment media
productions will be at no additional cost
to the government and taxpayers. Once
DoD has agreed with a production
company to provide production
assistance and the parties have signed a
Production Assistance Memorandum,
operations, and maintenance, supply
and equipment costs incurred by DoD
(collectively) as a direct consequence of
E:\FR\FM\17SEP1.SGM
17SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55675-55679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22149]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2014-0627; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-217-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2011-09-
03, which applies to all Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Model 382, 382B, 382E, 382F, and 382G airplanes. AD
2011-09-03 currently requires repetitive eddy current inspections to
detect cracks in the center wing upper and lower rainbow fittings, and
corrective actions if necessary; and repetitive replacement of rainbow
fittings, which would extend the repetitive interval for the next
inspection. Since we issued AD 2011-09-03, analysis of in-service
cracking has shown that a reduction in the inspection intervals is
necessary for the upper rainbow fittings. This proposed AD is intended
to complete certain mandated programs intended to support the airplane
reaching its limit of validity (LOV) of the engineering data that
support the established structural maintenance program. This proposed
AD would require reduced intervals for inspections of the upper rainbow
fittings. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct fatigue
cracking of the upper and lower rainbow fittings on the center wings,
which could grow large and lead to the failure of the fitting and a
catastrophic failure of the center wing.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 3,
2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
[[Page 55676]]
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company,
Airworthiness Office, Dept. 6A0M, Zone 0252, Column P-58, 86 S. Cobb
Drive, Marietta, GA 30063; telephone 770-494-5444; fax 770-494-5445;
email ams.portal@lmco.com; Internet https://www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/TechPubs.html. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton Washington 98057. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0627; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Gray, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337; phone: 404-
474-5554; fax: 404-474-5606; email: carl.w.gray@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0627;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-217-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On April 12, 2011, we issued AD 2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76
FR 22311, April 21, 2011), for all Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Model 382, 382B, 382E, 382F, and 382G
airplanes. AD 2011-09-03 requires repetitive eddy current inspections
to detect cracks in the center wing upper and lower rainbow fittings,
and corrective actions if necessary; and repetitive replacements of
rainbow fittings, which would extend the repetitive interval for the
next inspection. AD 2011-09-03 resulted from reports of fatigue
cracking of the wing upper and lower rainbow fittings during durability
testing and on in-service airplanes. Analysis of in-service cracking
has shown that these rainbow fittings are susceptible to multiple site
fatigue damage. We issued AD 2011-09-03 to detect and correct such
fatigue cracks, which could grow large and lead to the failure of the
fitting and a catastrophic failure of the center wing.
Actions Since AD 2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21,
2011), Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311,
April 21, 2011), analysis of in-service cracking has shown that the
initial and repetitive inspection schedules for the upper rainbow
fitting need to be revised to reduce the probability of failure until
the rainbow fitting is replaced.
We have also revised paragraphs (i) and (k) of AD 2011-09-03,
Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011) to clarify the rainbow
fitting is replaced with a new rainbow fitting, as specified in
Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 4, including Appendixes A
and B, dated May 20, 2009; and Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82,
including Appendices A and B, Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, including
Appendices A, B, and C, Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013. The compliance
times are reduced, but the procedures are unchanged from those
described in Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, including Appendices
A, B, and C, dated April 25, 2008.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain all of the requirements of AD 2011-
09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011). This proposed
AD would reduce compliance times for initial and repetitive inspections
of the upper rainbow fitting.
We have clarified the replacement process to more closely match the
intent of the service information to replace affected fittings with new
replacement fittings.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information
Where Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, including Appendices A,
B, and C, Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013, does not specify a
corrective action or states ``taking appropriate corrective action,''
this NPRM proposes to require repairing those conditions using a method
approved by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, FAA.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 14 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
[[Page 55677]]
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection of upper and lower 20 work-hours x $85 per (\1\) $1,700, per $23,800, per
fitting [retained actions from hour = $1,700 per inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
AD 2011[dash]09[dash]03, inspection cycle.
Amendment 39[dash]16665 (76 FR
22311, April 21, 2011)].
Fitting replacement [retained 2,438 work-hours x $85 $40,000 $247,230, per $3,461,220, per
actions from AD per hour = $207,230 replacement. replacement.
2011[dash]09[dash]03, per replacement.
Amendment 39[dash]16665 (76 FR
22311, April 21, 2011)].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\(1)\ None.
This proposed AD reduces the compliance times for the upper rainbow
fitting inspections and adds no additional economic burden.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2011-09-
03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), and adding the
following new AD:
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company:
Docket No. FAA-2014-0627; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-217-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by November 3,
2014.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311,
April 21, 2011.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Model 382, 382B, 382E, 382F, and 382G
airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by an analysis of in-service cracking that
has shown that the rainbow fittings are susceptible to multiple site
fatigue damage. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue
cracking of the upper and lower rainbow fittings on the center
wings, which could grow large and lead to the failure of the fitting
and a catastrophic failure of the center wing.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Retained Initial Inspections
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), with
revised service information. Except as required by paragraph (m) of
this AD, at the later of the times specified in paragraphs (g)(1)
and (g)(2) of this AD: Do eddy current inspections to detect
cracking of the center wing upper and lower rainbow fittings on the
left and right side of the airplane. Do the actions in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin
382-57-82, Revision 4, including Appendixes A and B, dated May 20,
2009; or Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, including Appendices A
and B, Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013. If any crack is found during
the inspections required by this paragraph, before further flight,
do the actions required by paragraph (k) of this AD. Doing the
requirements of paragraph (m) of this AD terminates the requirements
of this paragraph for the affected upper rainbow fitting only. As of
the effective date of this AD, only use Lockheed Service Bulletin
382-57-82, including Appendices A and B, Revision 6, dated July 11,
2013, for accomplishing the actions specified in this paragraph.
(1) Before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight hours on the
rainbow fitting.
(2) Within 365 days or 600 flight hours on the rainbow fitting
after May 26, 2011, (the effective date of AD 2011-09-03, Amendment
39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011)), whichever occurs first.
(h) Retained Repetitive Inspection Schedule
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), with a
new exception. Except as required by paragraph (n) of this AD,
repeat the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD at
intervals not to exceed 3,600 flight hours on the center wing, until
the rainbow fitting has accumulated 30,000 total flight hours. If
any crack is found during the inspections required by paragraph (h)
of this AD, before further flight, do the actions required by
paragraph (k) of this AD. Doing
[[Page 55678]]
the requirements of paragraph (n) of this AD terminates the
requirements of this paragraph for the affected upper rainbow
fitting only.
(i) Retained Rainbow Fitting Replacements
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD
2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), with
revised service information. Before the accumulation of 30,000
flight hours on the rainbow fitting, or within 600 flight hours
after May 26, 2011, (the effective date of AD 2011-09-03, Amendment
39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011)), whichever occurs later:
Replace the rainbow fitting with a new rainbow fitting, do all
related investigative actions, and do all applicable corrective
actions, in accordance with paragraph 2.C. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 4,
including Appendix C, dated May 20, 2009, except as required by
paragraph (l) of this AD; or Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82,
including Appendix C, Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013, except as
required by paragraph (l) of this AD. Replace the rainbow fitting
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 30,000 flight hours. As of the
effective date of this AD, only use Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-
57-82, including Appendix C, Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013, for
accomplishing the actions specified in this paragraph.
(j) Retained Post-Replacement Repetitive Inspections
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (j) of AD
2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), with a
new exception. For upper and lower rainbow fittings replaced in
accordance with paragraph (i) or (k) of this AD: Except as required
by paragraph (o) of this AD, do the eddy current inspections
specified in paragraph (g) of this AD within 15,000 flight hours
after doing the replacement and repeat the eddy current inspections
specified in paragraph (h) of this AD thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 3,600 flight hours until the rainbow fittings are replaced in
accordance with paragraph (i) or (k) of this AD. Doing the
requirements of paragraph (o) of this AD terminates the requirements
of this paragraph for the affected upper rainbow fitting only.
(k) Retained Replacement, Related Investigative Actions, and Corrective
Actions
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (k) of AD
2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), with
revised service information and revised references to inspection
paragraphs. If, during any inspection required by paragraph (g),
(h), (m), or (n) of this AD, any crack is detected in the rainbow
fitting, before further flight, replace the rainbow fitting with a
new rainbow fitting, do all related investigative actions, and do
all applicable corrective actions, in accordance with Paragraph 2.C.
of the Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-
57-82, Revision 4, including Appendix C, dated May 20, 2009, except
as provided by paragraph (l) of this AD; or Lockheed Service
Bulletin 382-57-82, including Appendix C, Revision 6, dated July 11,
2013, except as required by paragraph (l) of this AD. As of the
effective date of this AD, only use Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-
57-82, including Appendix C, Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013, for
accomplishing the actions specified in this paragraph.
(l) Retained Exceptions to Service Bulletin
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (l) of AD
2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), with
revised service information. Where Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-
82, Revision 4, including Appendixes A, B, and C, dated May 20,
2009; or Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, including Appendices
A, B, and C, Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013; specifies to contact
the manufacturer for disposition of certain repair conditions or
does not specify corrective actions if certain conditions are found,
this AD requires repairing those conditions using a method approved
by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA.
For a repair method to be approved by the Manager, Atlanta ACO, as
required by this paragraph, the Manager's approval letter must
specifically refer to this AD.
(m) New Requirement: Reduced Initial Compliance Time for Upper Rainbow
Fittings
At the applicable compliance time specified in paragraphs (m)(1)
and (m)(2) of this AD, do eddy current inspections to detect
cracking of the center wing upper rainbow fittings on the left and
right side of the airplane. Do the actions in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82,
including Appendices A and B, Revision 6, dated July 11, 2013. If
any crack is found during the inspections required by this
paragraph, before further flight, do the actions required by
paragraph (k) of this AD. Doing the requirements of this paragraph
terminates the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD for that
upper rainbow fitting only. Repeat the inspection at the interval
required by paragraph (n) of this AD.
(1) For upper rainbow fittings that have accumulated less than
10,000 total flight hours as of the effective date of this AD, the
compliance time is at the later of the times in paragraphs (m)(1)(i)
and (m)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Before the accumulation of 10,000 total flight hours.
(ii) Within 365 days or 600 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
(2) For upper rainbow fittings that have accumulated 10,000
total flight hours or more, but less than 15,000 total flight hours
as of the effective date of this AD, the compliance time is the
earlier of the times specified in paragraphs (m)(2)(i) and
(m)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Within 365 days or 600 flight hours after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first.
(ii) Before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight hours on the
rainbow fitting.
(n) New Requirement: Reduced Repetitive Inspection Intervals
For upper rainbow fittings on which the requirements of
paragraph (g), (h), or (m) of this AD were done, do the next
inspection at the earlier of the times required in paragraphs (n)(1)
and (n)(2) of this AD. Thereafter, repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (m) of this AD at intervals not to exceed 2,500 flight
hours until the upper rainbow fitting has accumulated 30,000 total
flight hours. If any crack is found during the inspections required
by this paragraph, before further flight, do the actions required by
paragraph (k) of this AD. Doing an inspection required by this
paragraph terminates the requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD
for the affected upper rainbow fitting only.
(1) Within 3,600 flight hours since the last inspection done in
accordance with paragraph (g), (h), or (m) of this AD, whichever
occurs latest.
(2) At the later of the times specified in paragraphs (n)(2)(i)
and (n)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Within 2,500 flight hours after the last inspection done in
accordance with paragraph (g), (h), or (m) of this AD, whichever
occurs latest.
(ii) Within 365 days or 600 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
(o) New Requirement: Reduced Post-Replacement Repetitive Inspections
For upper rainbow fittings replaced in accordance with paragraph
(i) or (k) of this AD, do the inspection required by paragraph (m)
of this AD at the earlier of the compliance times required in
paragraph (o)(1) and (o)(2) of this AD. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 2,500 flight hours. Doing the
inspections required by this paragraph terminates the requirements
of paragraph (j) of this AD for the affected upper rainbow fitting
only.
(1) At the later of the times in paragraphs (o)(1)(i) and
(o)(1)(ii) of this AD. (i) Within 10,000 total flight hours on the
upper rainbow fitting.
(ii) Within 365 days or 600 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
(2) Within 15,000 total flight hours on the upper rainbow
fitting.
(p) Credit for Previous Actions
The service information identified in paragraphs (p)(1)(i),
(p)(1)(ii), (p)(1)(iii), (p)(2), and (p)(3) is not incorporated by
reference in this AD.
(1) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g), (h), (i), (j), and (k) of this AD, if those actions
were performed before the effective date of this AD using the
service information identified in paragraphs (p)(1)(i), (p)(1)(ii),
and (p)(1)(iii) of this AD.
(i) Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, including Appendices A
and B, dated December 7, 2004.
(ii) Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 1, including
Appendices A and B, dated February 24, 2005.
[[Page 55679]]
(iii) Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 2, including
Appendices A and B, dated February 15, 2007.
(2) This paragraph restates paragraph (m) of AD 2011-09-03,
Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011). This paragraph
provides credit for actions required by paragraphs (g), (h), (i),
(j), and (k) of this AD, if those actions were performed before May
26, 2011 (the effective date of AD 2011-09-03), using Lockheed
Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 3, including Appendixes A, B,
and C, dated April 25, 2008.
(3) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), (m), (n), and (o) of this AD, if
those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD
using Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, including Appendices A,
B, and C, Revision 5, dated August 12, 2010.
(q) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (r)(2) of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) AMOCs approved for AD 2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR
22311, April 21, 2011), are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding
provisions of this AD.
(r) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Carl Gray,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park,
Georgia 30337; phone: 404-474-5554; fax: 404-474-5606; email:
carl.w.gray@faa.gov.
(2) For information about AMOCs, contact Hal Horsbough,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park,
Georgia 30337; phone: 404-474-5554; fax: 404-474-5606; email:
hal.horsbough@faa.gov.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company,
Airworthiness Office, Dept. 6A0M, Zone 0252, Column P-58, 86 S. Cobb
Drive, Marietta, GA 30063; telephone 770-494-5444; fax 770-494-5445;
email ams.portal@lmco.com; Internet https://www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/TechPubs.html. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 9, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-22149 Filed 9-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P