Dry Cargo Residue Discharges in the Great Lakes, 54907-54908 [2014-21893]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 178 / Monday, September 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. 4. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). 10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might disproportionately affect children. 11. Indian Tribal Governments 5. Federalism A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism. 6. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES2 VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:35 Sep 12, 2014 Jkt 232001 1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233. 2. In § 100.1301 revise paragraph (a) to read as follows: ■ § 100.1301 Seattle seafair unlimited hydroplane race. Dated: September 3, 2014. R.T. Gromlich, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. 2014–21981 Filed 9–12–14; 8:45 am] We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023–01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves the amendment of the special local regulation outlined in 33 CFR 100.1301. This rule is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule. This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. This rule is not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. 9. Civil Justice Reform Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 100 as follows: 13. Technical Standards 12. Energy Effects 14. Environment This rule would not cause a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 (a) This section will only be enforced during times announced by the Captain of the Port. The event, which is one week or less in duration, generally occurs during the last week of July or the first two weeks of August. The Captain of the Port will provide notice of the enforcement of this special local regulation by Notice of Enforcement in the Federal Register. Additional information may be available through Broadcast Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners. * * * * * 7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 8. Taking of Private Property 54907 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 BILLING CODE 9110–04–P Sfmt 4700 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 151 [Docket No. USCG–2004–19621] RIN 1625–AA89 Dry Cargo Residue Discharges in the Great Lakes Coast Guard, DHS. Final rule; information collection approval. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard announces that it has received approval from the Office of Management and Budget for an information collection request associated with the January 2014 final rule on the discharge of bulk dry cargo residue on the U.S. waters of the Great Lakes. With this approval, all provisions of the final rule are now fully in effect and can be enforced. The final rule SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\15SER1.SGM 15SER1 54908 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 178 / Monday, September 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations promotes the Coast Guard’s maritime safety and stewardship missions. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY The requirements of 33 CFR 151.66(b)(5), published in the Federal Register on January 31, 2014 (79 FR 5261), will be enforceable beginning September 15, 2014. 40 CFR Part 52 DATES: [EPA–R07–OAR–2014–0271; FRL–9916–50– Region 7] For information about this document call or email Rich Walter, Coast Guard; telephone 202–372–3856, email Richard.W.Walter@uscg.mil. For information about viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–9826, toll free 1–800–647–5527. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: On January 31, 2014, the Coast Guard published a final rule titled ‘‘Dry Cargo Residue Discharges in the Great Lakes.’’ 1 In this final rule, the Coast Guard implemented new requirements related to the operation of U.S. and foreign vessels carrying bulk dry cargo such as limestone, iron ore, and coal on the U.S. waters of the Great Lakes, and the operation of U.S. bulk dry cargo vessels anywhere on the Great Lakes. Our final rule delayed the effective date of 33 CFR 151.66(b)(5) because it contains collection of information provisions that require approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. On August 5, 2014, OMB approved the collection and assigned OMB Control Number 1625–0072. Accordingly, we announce that section 151.66(b)(5) is enforceable from September 15, 2014. The approval for this collection of information expires on August 31, 2017. This action completes the rulemaking associated with RIN 1625–AA89 and USCG–2004–19621. This document is issued under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: September 5, 2014. J.G. Lantz Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards, U.S. Coast Guard. [FR Doc. 2014–21893 Filed 9–12–14; 8:45 am] rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES2 BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 1 79 FR 5261 (Jan. 31, 2014). VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:35 Sep 12, 2014 Jkt 232001 Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Kansas; Infrastructure SIP Requirements for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve elements of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from the State of Kansas addressing the applicable requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110 for the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Lead (Pb), which requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP to support implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each new or revised NAAQS promulgated by EPA. These SIPs are commonly referred to as ‘‘infrastructure’’ SIPs. The infrastructure requirements are designed to ensure that the structural components of each state’s air quality management program are adequate to meet the state’s responsibilities under the CAA. DATES: This final rule is effective October 15, 2014. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2014–0271. All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically at http:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours in advance. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lachala Kemp, Air Planning and Development Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7, 11201 Renner Boulevard, SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Lenexa, KS 66219; telephone number: (913) 551–7214; fax number: (913) 551– 7065; email address: kemp.lachala@ epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by addressing the following: I. Background II. Summary of SIP Revision III. Final Action IV. Statutory and Executive Order Review I. Background On July 16, 2014, (79 FR 41476), EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for the State of Kansas. The NPR proposed approval of Kansas’ submission that provides the basic elements specified in section 110(a)(2) of the CAA, or portions thereof, necessary to implement, maintain, and enforce the 2008 Pb NAAQS. II. Summary of SIP Revision On January 13, 2012, EPA received a SIP submission from the state of Kansas that addresses the infrastructure elements specified in section 110(a)(2) for the 2008 Pb NAAQS. This submission addressed the following infrastructure elements of section 110(a)(2): (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). Specific requirements of section 110(a)(2) of the CAA and the rationale for EPA’s proposed action to approve the SIP submission are explained in the NPR and will not be restated here. No public comments were received on the NPR. III. Final Action EPA is approving Kansas’ submission which provides the basic program elements specified in section 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M) of the CAA, or portions thereof, necessary to implement, maintain, and enforce the 2008 Pb NAAQS, as a revision to the Kansas SIP. This action is being taken under section 110 of the CAA. As discussed in each applicable section of the NPR, EPA is not acting on section 110(a)(2)(I)—Nonattainment Area Plan or Plan Revisions Under Part D and on the visibility protection portion of section 110(a)(2)(J). VI. Statutory and Executive Order Review Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, E:\FR\FM\15SER1.SGM 15SER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54907-54908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21893]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 151

[Docket No. USCG-2004-19621]
RIN 1625-AA89


Dry Cargo Residue Discharges in the Great Lakes

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule; information collection approval.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces that it has received approval from 
the Office of Management and Budget for an information collection 
request associated with the January 2014 final rule on the discharge of 
bulk dry cargo residue on the U.S. waters of the Great Lakes. With this 
approval, all provisions of the final rule are now fully in effect and 
can be enforced. The final rule

[[Page 54908]]

promotes the Coast Guard's maritime safety and stewardship missions.

DATES: The requirements of 33 CFR 151.66(b)(5), published in the 
Federal Register on January 31, 2014 (79 FR 5261), will be enforceable 
beginning September 15, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this document 
call or email Rich Walter, Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-3856, email 
Richard.W.Walter@uscg.mil. For information about viewing or submitting 
material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket 
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826, toll free 1-800-647-5527.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 31, 2014, the Coast Guard 
published a final rule titled ``Dry Cargo Residue Discharges in the 
Great Lakes.'' \1\ In this final rule, the Coast Guard implemented new 
requirements related to the operation of U.S. and foreign vessels 
carrying bulk dry cargo such as limestone, iron ore, and coal on the 
U.S. waters of the Great Lakes, and the operation of U.S. bulk dry 
cargo vessels anywhere on the Great Lakes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 79 FR 5261 (Jan. 31, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Our final rule delayed the effective date of 33 CFR 151.66(b)(5) 
because it contains collection of information provisions that require 
approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. On August 5, 
2014, OMB approved the collection and assigned OMB Control Number 1625-
0072. Accordingly, we announce that section 151.66(b)(5) is enforceable 
from September 15, 2014. The approval for this collection of 
information expires on August 31, 2017. This action completes the 
rulemaking associated with RIN 1625-AA89 and USCG-2004-19621.
    This document is issued under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a).

    Dated: September 5, 2014.
J.G. Lantz
Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2014-21893 Filed 9-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P