Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Thames River, New London, CT, 54244-54246 [2014-21680]
Download as PDF
54244
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 176 / Thursday, September 11, 2014 / Proposed Rules
§ 117.T269
Biscayne Bay
Dated: August 18, 2014.
John H. Korn,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014–21681 Filed 9–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Tables of Acronyms
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
§ Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0983]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Thames River, New London, CT
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
change the operating schedule that
governs the Amtrak Bridge across the
Thames River, mile 3.0, at New London,
Connecticut. Under this notice of
proposed rulemaking the bridge would
open to 75 feet above mean high water
instead of the full open position of 135.3
feet unless a full bridge opening is
requested. It is expected that this change
to the regulations will create efficiency
in drawbridge operations while
continuing to meet the reasonable needs
of navigation.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before November 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2013–0983 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, 20590–0001.
Deliveries accepted between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments. To avoid duplication, please
use only one of these three methods.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Sep 10, 2014
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Ms. Judy Leung-Yee,
Project Officer, First Coast Guard
District Bridge Program, telephone 212–
668–7165, email judy.k.leung-yee@
uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Venetian Causeway Bridge (East)
shall remain closed to navigation except
that it shall open at 10:30 a.m. and 7:30
p.m. daily.
Jkt 232001
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2013–0983),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (https://
www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2013–0983 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the
line associated with this rulemaking. If
you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2013–0983) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit either
the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of
Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why one would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Amtrak Bridge across the Thames
River, mile 3.0, at New London,
Connecticut, has a vertical clearance in
the closed position of 29.4 feet at mean
high water and 31.8 feet at mean low
water. The drawbridge operation
regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.224.
The waterway users are both
recreational and commercial vessels.
The owner of the bridge, National
Passenger Railroad Corporation
(Amtrak), is requesting an exception to
the requirement to fully open the bridge
to its full 135.3 foot height above mean
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
54245
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 176 / Thursday, September 11, 2014 / Proposed Rules
high water when not required for a
vessel to pass under safely. Amtrak
submitted the request to the Coast
Guard to change the drawbridge
operation regulations to allow the
Amtrak Bridge to open to 75 feet above
mean high water for smaller vessels
which comprise the majority of the
requested openings. The Amtrak Bridge
will perform a full bridge opening of
135.3 feet above mean high water when
requested to do so.
The existing regulations require the
bridge to open immediately on signal for
public vessels of the United States and
commercial vessels; except that, when a
train scheduled to cross the bridge
without stopping has passed the
Midway, Groton, or New London
stations and is in motion toward the
bridge, the bridge must not be opened
for the passage of any vessel until the
train has crossed the bridge. The bridge
shall open as soon as practicable for all
other vessels but no later than 20
minutes after the signal to open is given.
Under this proposed rule the draw
would open on signal as stated above
but only to 75 feet above mean high
water; except, when a full opening to
135.3 feet above mean high water is
requested. The bridge tender is aware of
the vertical clearance from the low steel
chord of the bridge to the water level by
a sensor displaying distance on the
Operator Control Panel housed in the
Drawbridge Control Room at the bridge.
A selector switch is placed in the 75
foot position or full lift (135.3 feet)
position by the bridge tender prior to
operations depending on the vessel
requirements.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to change
the drawbridge operation regulations at
33 CFR 117.224 to allow the Amtrak
Railroad Bridge to open on signal to
only 75 feet above mean high water
unless a full opening to 135.3 feet above
mean high water is requested.
We analyzed the bridge opening data
for the Amtrak Railroad Bridge during
calendar year 2013, comparing the
number of bridge openings to 135.3 feet
and the number of bridge openings to 75
feet for each month of the year.
The bridge opening breakdown for
2013 is as follows:
Total
openings
Month
Openings to
135 feet
Openings to
75 feet
98
58
62
83
220
255
257
243
227
216
84
97
17
8
2
12
40
38
42
34
26
25
8
6
81
50
60
71
180
217
215
209
201
191
76
91
Totals ....................................................................................................................................
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
January ........................................................................................................................................
February .......................................................................................................................................
March ...........................................................................................................................................
April ..............................................................................................................................................
May ..............................................................................................................................................
June .............................................................................................................................................
July ...............................................................................................................................................
August ..........................................................................................................................................
September ...................................................................................................................................
October ........................................................................................................................................
November ....................................................................................................................................
December ....................................................................................................................................
1,900
258
1,642
Out of the total 1900 bridge openings,
only 13.57% were to the 135.3 foot
elevation and the remaining 86.43%
were to the 75 foot elevation.
As a result the Coast Guard believes
that allowing the Amtrak Railroad
Bridge to open to 75 feet, except when
a request to open to 135.3 feet is
requested, is reasonable based on the
low number requests to open to 135 feet
and to match actual operations.
Due to the unique nature of the
drawbridge operation for this Amtrak
Bridge, the Coast Guard also proposes to
alter the lighting requirements to better
meet the needs of navigation at this
drawbridge. In accordance with 33 CFR
§ 118.85, the center of the navigational
channel under the operable span will be
marked by a range of two green lights
when the vertical span is open to
navigation. The Coast Guard proposes to
allow one solid green light and one
flashing green light when the bridge is
at the 75 footmark and two solid green
lights when the bridge is fully opened
to 135.3 feet.
We believe this proposed rule will
continue to meet the reasonable needs
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Sep 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
of navigation while also improving
drawbridge efficiency of operation.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require
an assessment of potential costs and
benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order
12866, or under section 1 of Executive
Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
those Orders. We believe that this rule
is not a significant regulatory action
because the bridge will open fully for
any vessel upon request.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reason: The bridge will open
fully for all vessel traffic at all times
upon request.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
54246
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 176 / Thursday, September 11, 2014 / Proposed Rules
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Sep 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01,
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. This rule is categorically
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of significant
environmental impact from the
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
2. Revise § 117.224 to read as follows:
§ 117.224
Thames River.
The draw of the Amtrak Railroad
Bridge, mile 3.0, at New London, shall
operate as follows:
(a) The draw shall open on signal to
75 feet above mean high water for all
vessel traffic unless a full bridge
opening to 135.3 feet above mean high
water is requested.
(b) The 75 foot opening will be
signified by a range light display with
one solid green light and one flashing
green light and the full 135.3 foot
opening will be signified with two solid
green range lights.
(c) The draw shall open on signal for
public vessels of the United States and
commercial vessels; except that, when a
train scheduled to cross the bridge
without stopping has passed the
Midway, Groton, or New London
stations and is in motion toward the
bridge, the lift span shall not be opened
until the train has crossed the bridge.
(d) The draw shall open on signal as
soon practicable for all other vessel
traffic but no later than 20 minutes after
the signal to open is given.
Dated: August 22, 2014,
V.B. Gifford, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014–21680 Filed 9–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\11SEP1.SGM
11SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54244-54246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21680]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2013-0983]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Thames River, New London, CT
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that
governs the Amtrak Bridge across the Thames River, mile 3.0, at New
London, Connecticut. Under this notice of proposed rulemaking the
bridge would open to 75 feet above mean high water instead of the full
open position of 135.3 feet unless a full bridge opening is requested.
It is expected that this change to the regulations will create
efficiency in drawbridge operations while continuing to meet the
reasonable needs of navigation.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before November 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2013-0983 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these
three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Ms. Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First Coast
Guard District Bridge Program, telephone 212-668-7165, email
judy.k.leung-yee@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Tables of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2013-0983), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (https://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online
via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the
Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax,
hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as having
been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2013-0983 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail
and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2013-0983) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit either the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of
Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. We have an agreement with the Department of
Transportation to use the Docket Management Facility.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and
place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Amtrak Bridge across the Thames River, mile 3.0, at New London,
Connecticut, has a vertical clearance in the closed position of 29.4
feet at mean high water and 31.8 feet at mean low water. The drawbridge
operation regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.224.
The waterway users are both recreational and commercial vessels.
The owner of the bridge, National Passenger Railroad Corporation
(Amtrak), is requesting an exception to the requirement to fully open
the bridge to its full 135.3 foot height above mean
[[Page 54245]]
high water when not required for a vessel to pass under safely. Amtrak
submitted the request to the Coast Guard to change the drawbridge
operation regulations to allow the Amtrak Bridge to open to 75 feet
above mean high water for smaller vessels which comprise the majority
of the requested openings. The Amtrak Bridge will perform a full bridge
opening of 135.3 feet above mean high water when requested to do so.
The existing regulations require the bridge to open immediately on
signal for public vessels of the United States and commercial vessels;
except that, when a train scheduled to cross the bridge without
stopping has passed the Midway, Groton, or New London stations and is
in motion toward the bridge, the bridge must not be opened for the
passage of any vessel until the train has crossed the bridge. The
bridge shall open as soon as practicable for all other vessels but no
later than 20 minutes after the signal to open is given.
Under this proposed rule the draw would open on signal as stated
above but only to 75 feet above mean high water; except, when a full
opening to 135.3 feet above mean high water is requested. The bridge
tender is aware of the vertical clearance from the low steel chord of
the bridge to the water level by a sensor displaying distance on the
Operator Control Panel housed in the Drawbridge Control Room at the
bridge. A selector switch is placed in the 75 foot position or full
lift (135.3 feet) position by the bridge tender prior to operations
depending on the vessel requirements.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to change the drawbridge operation
regulations at 33 CFR 117.224 to allow the Amtrak Railroad Bridge to
open on signal to only 75 feet above mean high water unless a full
opening to 135.3 feet above mean high water is requested.
We analyzed the bridge opening data for the Amtrak Railroad Bridge
during calendar year 2013, comparing the number of bridge openings to
135.3 feet and the number of bridge openings to 75 feet for each month
of the year.
The bridge opening breakdown for 2013 is as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Openings to Openings to 75
Month Total openings 135 feet feet
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
January......................................................... 98 17 81
February........................................................ 58 8 50
March........................................................... 62 2 60
April........................................................... 83 12 71
May............................................................. 220 40 180
June............................................................ 255 38 217
July............................................................ 257 42 215
August.......................................................... 243 34 209
September....................................................... 227 26 201
October......................................................... 216 25 191
November........................................................ 84 8 76
December........................................................ 97 6 91
-----------------------------------------------
Totals...................................................... 1,900 258 1,642
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of the total 1900 bridge openings, only 13.57% were to the
135.3 foot elevation and the remaining 86.43% were to the 75 foot
elevation.
As a result the Coast Guard believes that allowing the Amtrak
Railroad Bridge to open to 75 feet, except when a request to open to
135.3 feet is requested, is reasonable based on the low number requests
to open to 135 feet and to match actual operations.
Due to the unique nature of the drawbridge operation for this
Amtrak Bridge, the Coast Guard also proposes to alter the lighting
requirements to better meet the needs of navigation at this drawbridge.
In accordance with 33 CFR Sec. 118.85, the center of the navigational
channel under the operable span will be marked by a range of two green
lights when the vertical span is open to navigation. The Coast Guard
proposes to allow one solid green light and one flashing green light
when the bridge is at the 75 footmark and two solid green lights when
the bridge is fully opened to 135.3 feet.
We believe this proposed rule will continue to meet the reasonable
needs of navigation while also improving drawbridge efficiency of
operation.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866, or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under those Orders. We believe that this rule is
not a significant regulatory action because the bridge will open fully
for any vessel upon request.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reason: The
bridge will open fully for all vessel traffic at all times upon
request.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
[[Page 54246]]
qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically
affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01, and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category
of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule simply promulgates
the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. This rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of significant environmental
impact from the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 117.224 to read as follows:
Sec. 117.224 Thames River.
The draw of the Amtrak Railroad Bridge, mile 3.0, at New London,
shall operate as follows:
(a) The draw shall open on signal to 75 feet above mean high water
for all vessel traffic unless a full bridge opening to 135.3 feet above
mean high water is requested.
(b) The 75 foot opening will be signified by a range light display
with one solid green light and one flashing green light and the full
135.3 foot opening will be signified with two solid green range lights.
(c) The draw shall open on signal for public vessels of the United
States and commercial vessels; except that, when a train scheduled to
cross the bridge without stopping has passed the Midway, Groton, or New
London stations and is in motion toward the bridge, the lift span shall
not be opened until the train has crossed the bridge.
(d) The draw shall open on signal as soon practicable for all other
vessel traffic but no later than 20 minutes after the signal to open is
given.
Dated: August 22, 2014,
V.B. Gifford, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014-21680 Filed 9-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P