HUD Implementation of Fiscal Year 2014 Appropriations Provisions on Public Housing Agency Consortia, Biennial Inspections, Extremely Low-Income Definition, and Utility Allowances; Technical Correction, 54186-54187 [2014-21637]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
54186
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 176 / Thursday, September 11, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
J–94: J–94 extends between the
Oakland, CA, VORTAC and the Boston,
MA, VOR/DME, excluding the airspace
within Canada. The route segment from
the Flint, MI, VORTAC to the London,
ON, Canada, VOR/DME is removed.
J–546: J–546 is removed.
J–551: J–551 is removed.
J–553: J–553 is removed.
V–84: V–84 extends between the
Northbrook, IL, VOR/DME and the
Syracuse, NY, VORTAC, excluding the
airspace within Canada. The route
segment between the Flint, MI,
VORTAC and the London, ON, Canada,
VOR/DME is removed.
V–216: V–216 extends between the
Lamar, CO, VOR/DME and the Toronto,
ON, Canada, VOR/DME, excluding the
airspace within Canada. The route
segment between the Janesville, WI,
VOR/DME and the Toronto, ON,
Canada, VOR/DME is removed.
V–320: V–320 extends between the
Pellston, MI, VORTAC and the Toronto,
ON, Canada, VOR/DME. The route
segment between the Saginaw, MI,
VOR/DME and the Toronto, ON,
Canada, VOR/DME is removed.
The navigation aid radials cited in the
jet route and VOR Federal airway
descriptions are unchanged and stated
relative to True north.
Jet routes are published in paragraph
2004 and VOR Federal airways are
published in paragraph 6010(a),
respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9X
dated August 7, 2013, and effective
September 15, 2013, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The jet routes and VOR Federal
airways listed in this document will be
subsequently published in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not
warrant preparation of a regulatory
evaluation as the anticipated impact is
so minimal. Since this is a routine
matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Sep 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103. Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to
assign the use of the airspace necessary
to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority as
it modifies the route structure as
necessary to preserve the safe and
efficient flow of air traffic within the
NAS.
J–94 [Amended]
From Oakland, CA; Manteca, CA; INT
Manteca 047° and Mustang, NV, 208° radials;
Mustang; Lovelock, NV; Battle Mountain,
NV; Lucin, UT; Rock Springs, WY;
Scottsbluff, NE; O’Neill, NE; Fort Dodge, IA;
Dubuque, IA; Northbrook, IL; Pullman, MI; to
Flint, MI. From London, ON, Canada;
Buffalo, NY; Albany, NY; to Boston, MA;
excluding the airspace within Canada.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 311a. This airspace action is
not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
*
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
J–551 [Removed]
*
*
*
J–553 [Removed]
*
*
Paragraph 6010
Airways
Domestic VOR Federal
*
*
*
*
*
V–84 [Amended]
From Northbrook, IL; Pullman, MI;
Lansing, MI; to Flint, MI. From London, ON,
Canada; Buffalo, NY; Geneseo, NY; INT
Geneseo 091° and Syracuse, NY, 240° radials;
to Syracuse; excluding the airspace within
Canada.
*
*
*
*
*
V–216 [Amended]
From Lamar, CO; Hill City, KS; Mankato,
KS; Pawnee City, NE; Lamoni, IA; Ottumwa,
IA; Iowa City, IA; INT Iowa City 062° and
Janesville, WI, 240° radials; to Janesville.
*
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
*
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
*
J–546 [Removed]
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
■
*
*
*
*
*
V–320 [Amended]
From Pellston, MI; Traverse City, MI;
Mount Pleasant, MI; to Saginaw, MI.
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 4,
2014.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and Regulations
Group.
[FR Doc. 2014–21577 Filed 9–10–14; 8:45 am]
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
§ 71.1
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9X,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 7, 2013 and
effective September 15, 2013, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 2004
Jet Routes
*
*
*
*
*
J–16 [Amended]
From Battle Ground, WA; Pendleton, OR;
Whitehall, MT; Billings, MT; Dupree, SD;
Sioux Falls, SD; Mason City, IA; to Badger,
WI. From London, ON, Canada; Buffalo, NY;
Albany, NY; to Boston, MA; excluding the
airspace within Canada.
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00002
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
24 CFR Parts 5, 943, and 982
[Docket No. FR–5778–C–02]
HUD Implementation of Fiscal Year
2014 Appropriations Provisions on
Public Housing Agency Consortia,
Biennial Inspections, Extremely LowIncome Definition, and Utility
Allowances; Technical Correction
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Notice of statutory changes;
correction.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\11SER1.SGM
11SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 176 / Thursday, September 11, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
On June, 25, 2014, HUD
published a document implementing
statutory changes made by the
Department of Housing and Urban
Development Appropriations Act, 2014
to certain programs administered by
HUD’s Office of Housing and HUD’s
Office of Public and Indian Housing. In
the discussion of implementation of the
new definition of ‘‘extremely lowincome’’ applicable to multifamily
projects administered by HUD’s Office
of Housing, the document referred to
‘‘contract administrators’’ and it should
have referenced ‘‘owners.’’ This
document makes that correction.
DATES: Effective Date: September 11,
2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Claire Brolin, Office of Multifamily
Housing Programs, Office of Housing,
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room
6106, Washington, DC 20410 at 202–
402–6634 (this is not a toll-free
number). Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access either
of these numbers through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Relay
Service at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Federal Register of June 25, 2014, in FR
Doc. 2014–14915, beginning on page
39540, the following corrections are
made:
1. On page 35942, in the first column,
correct the second paragraph under
section ‘‘C. Extremely Low-Income’’ to
read:
Beginning with the effective date of
this notice, a PHA or owner shall meet
its targeting requirements through a
combination of ELI admissions prior to
the effective date (using the prior
definition) and ELI admissions after the
effective date (using the new statutory
definition). Neither a PHA nor an owner
may skip over a family on the waiting
list if that family meets the new
definition of ELI as enacted by this
section.
2. On page 35942, in the first column,
correct the fifth paragraph under section
‘‘C. Extremely Low-Income’’ to read:
For the multifamily project-based
section 8 programs, the owner must
make available for occupancy by ELI
families not less than 40 percent of the
section 8-assisted dwelling units that
become available for occupancy in any
fiscal year.
1. On page 35942, in the second
column, correct the seventh paragraph
under section ‘‘C. Extremely LowIncome’’ to read:
In some communities, the extremely
low-income and very low-income levels
will be identical for some or all
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Sep 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
household sizes, in which case PHAs or
owners meet their ELI targeting
requirements by serving VLI
households, since those families meet
the new definition of ELI. To reduce the
work a PHA or owner must do to
determine which standard it should be
using, HUD’s Office of Policy
Development and Research has
calculated the new income limits for
extremely low-income families, taking
the previous sentence into account, and
has made the new area income limits
available online at https://
www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/il/
il14/.
54187
However, it has long been the internal
practice of the Department for the
Pardon Attorney to be subject to the
direction of the Deputy Attorney
General, and to submit clemency
recommendations through the Deputy
Attorney General for handling and
transmittal, rather than through the
Associate Attorney General.
This rule conforms Department
regulations to current practice.
Administrative Procedure Act
Dated: September 4, 2014.
Carol J. Galante,
Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal
Housing Commissioner.
This rule is a rule of agency
organization, procedure, and practice
and is therefore exempt from the usual
requirements of prior notice and
comment and a 30-day delay in effective
date. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b). This rule is
effective upon publication.
[FR Doc. 2014–21637 Filed 9–10–14; 8:45 am]
Regulatory Flexibility Act
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
The Attorney General, in accordance
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed this rule
and by approving it certifies that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because it
applies only to agency organization,
procedure, and practice. Further, a
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis was not
required to be prepared for this rule
because the Department was not
required to publish a general notice of
proposed rulemaking.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of the Attorney General
28 CFR Part 0
[OAG Docket No. 143; AG Order No. 3464–
2014]
Office of the Pardon Attorney
Office of the Attorney General,
Department of Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule revises certain
regulations of the Department of Justice
(the ‘‘Department’’) that govern the
Pardon Attorney. The rule conforms the
regulations to current practice, under
which the Pardon Attorney is subject to
the direction of, and submits
recommendations in clemency cases
through, the Deputy Attorney General.
DATES: The rule is effective on
September 11, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Leff, United States Department
of Justice, Suite 11000, 1425 New York
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20530, or
by telephone at (202) 616–6070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Present
regulations of the Department of Justice
provide that the Pardon Attorney is
subject to the direction of the Associate
Attorney General, and that the Pardon
Attorney shall submit all
recommendations in clemency cases
through the Associate Attorney General,
who in turn shall exercise such
discretion and authority as is
appropriate and necessary for the
handling and transmittal of such
recommendations to the President. See
28 CFR 0.35–0.36.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563—
Regulatory Review
This regulation has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review,’’ section 1(b), Principles of
Regulation, and in accordance with
Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review,’’
section 1(b), General Principles of
Regulation.
The Department has determined that
this rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review,’’ and accordingly this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have federalism
implications warranting the preparation
of a Federalism Assessment under
section 6 of Executive Order 13132
because it is a rule of agency
organization, procedure, and practice.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
This rule meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
E:\FR\FM\11SER1.SGM
11SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54186-54187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21637]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Parts 5, 943, and 982
[Docket No. FR-5778-C-02]
HUD Implementation of Fiscal Year 2014 Appropriations Provisions
on Public Housing Agency Consortia, Biennial Inspections, Extremely
Low-Income Definition, and Utility Allowances; Technical Correction
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Notice of statutory changes; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 54187]]
SUMMARY: On June, 25, 2014, HUD published a document implementing
statutory changes made by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development Appropriations Act, 2014 to certain programs administered
by HUD's Office of Housing and HUD's Office of Public and Indian
Housing. In the discussion of implementation of the new definition of
``extremely low-income'' applicable to multifamily projects
administered by HUD's Office of Housing, the document referred to
``contract administrators'' and it should have referenced ``owners.''
This document makes that correction.
DATES: Effective Date: September 11, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Claire Brolin, Office of Multifamily
Housing Programs, Office of Housing, U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room 6106, Washington, DC 20410
at 202-402-6634 (this is not a toll-free number). Persons with hearing
or speech impairments may access either of these numbers through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of June 25, 2014, in
FR Doc. 2014-14915, beginning on page 39540, the following corrections
are made:
1. On page 35942, in the first column, correct the second paragraph
under section ``C. Extremely Low-Income'' to read:
Beginning with the effective date of this notice, a PHA or owner
shall meet its targeting requirements through a combination of ELI
admissions prior to the effective date (using the prior definition) and
ELI admissions after the effective date (using the new statutory
definition). Neither a PHA nor an owner may skip over a family on the
waiting list if that family meets the new definition of ELI as enacted
by this section.
2. On page 35942, in the first column, correct the fifth paragraph
under section ``C. Extremely Low-Income'' to read:
For the multifamily project-based section 8 programs, the owner
must make available for occupancy by ELI families not less than 40
percent of the section 8-assisted dwelling units that become available
for occupancy in any fiscal year.
1. On page 35942, in the second column, correct the seventh
paragraph under section ``C. Extremely Low-Income'' to read:
In some communities, the extremely low-income and very low-income
levels will be identical for some or all household sizes, in which case
PHAs or owners meet their ELI targeting requirements by serving VLI
households, since those families meet the new definition of ELI. To
reduce the work a PHA or owner must do to determine which standard it
should be using, HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research has
calculated the new income limits for extremely low-income families,
taking the previous sentence into account, and has made the new area
income limits available online at https://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/il/il14/.
Dated: September 4, 2014.
Carol J. Galante,
Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2014-21637 Filed 9-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P