Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Revision to Control Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Storage Tanks, 53299-53303 [2014-21306]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 9, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
11. Indian Tribal Governments
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Sep 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a temporary safety
zone. This rule is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53299
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Add § 165.T13–280 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–280 Safety Zone; Vigor
Industrial Ferry Construction, West
Duwamish Waterway, Seattle, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the West
Duwamish Waterway in Seattle, WA
encompassed within the area created by
connecting the following points:
47°35′04″ N, 122°21′30″ W thence
westerly to 47°35′04″ N, 122°21′50″ W
thence northerly to 47°35′19″ N,
122°21′50″ W thence easterly to
47°35′19″ N, 122°21′30″ W thence
southerly to 47°35′04″ N, 122°21′30″ W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165, Subpart C, no person may enter or
remain in the safety zone created in this
rule unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port or a Designated Representative.
See 33 CFR Part 165, Subpart C, for
additional information and
requirements. Vessel operators wishing
to enter the zone during the
enforcement period must request
permission for entry by contacting the
Joint Harbor Operation Center at 206–
217–6001 or the Vessel Traffic Service
Puget Sound on VHF channel 14.
(c) Enforcement period. The safety
zone created in this rule is enforced
from 11:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. on
September 17, 2014, and from noon
until 6:30 p.m. on September 18, 2014
unless cancelled sooner by the Captain
of the Port.
Dated: August 26, 2014.
M.W. Raymond,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2014–21387 Filed 9–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2012–0096; FRL–9916–32–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Texas; Revision
to Control Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions from Storage Tanks
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
53300
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 9, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a Texas State
Implementation (SIP) revision for
control of volatile organic compound
(VOC) emissions from storage tanks. The
revision implements additional controls
in the Dallas-Fort Worth 1997 ozone
nonattainment area (DFW area);
modifies control requirements in the
DFW area, the Houston-GalvestonBrazoria ozone nonattainment area
(HGB area), the Beaumont-Port Arthur
area (BPA area) and El Paso, Gregg,
Nueces and Victoria Counties; and
makes non-substantive changes to VOC
control provisions that apply in
Aransas, Bexar, Calhoun, Matagorda,
San Patricio and Travis Counties. In
addition, EPA finds that the SIP revision
implements serious area reasonable
available control technology (RACT)
controls for the VOC storage source
category in the DFW area and continues
to implement severe area RACT for this
source category in the HGB area as
required by the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on
November 10, 2014 without further
notice, unless EPA receives relevant
adverse comment by October 9, 2014. If
EPA receives such comment, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that this rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2012–0096, by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions.
• Email: Mr. Carl Young at
young.carl@epa.gov.
• Mail or delivery: Mr. Guy
Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section
(6PD–L), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket No. EPA–R06–OAR–2012–0096.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Sep 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available at
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment with the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at
214–665–7253.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
Young, (214) 665–6645, young.carl@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. EPA’s Evaluation
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
A. CAA and SIPs
Section 110 of the CAA requires states
to develop and submit to EPA a SIP to
ensure that state air quality meets
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards. These ambient standards
currently address six criteria pollutants:
carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide,
ozone, lead, particulate matter, and
sulfur dioxide. Each federally-approved
SIP protects air quality primarily by
addressing air pollution at its point of
origin through air pollution regulations
and control strategies. EPA approved
SIP regulations and control strategies
are federally enforceable. As needed,
States revise the SIP as needed and
submit revisions to EPA for approval.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
B. SIP Revision Submitted on January
17, 2012
A SIP revision for controlling VOC
emissions from storage tanks was
adopted by Texas on December 7, 2011,
and submitted to us on January 17,
2012. VOCs are an ‘‘ozone precursor’’,
as they react with oxygen, nitrogen
oxides (NOX) and sunlight to form
ozone. Controlling sources of VOC and
NOX emissions can lower ozone levels
in the ambient air.
The revision amends Title 30, Chapter
115 of the Texas Administrative Code
(30 TAC 115) to (1) revise §§ 115.110,
115.112–115.117, and 115.119, and (2)
add new §§ 115.111 and 115.118. The
revision (1) implements additional VOC
controls for storage tanks in the DFW
area; (2) modifies VOC control
requirements in the DFW area, the HGB
area, the BPA area and El Paso, Gregg,
Nueces and Victoria Counties and (3)
makes non-substantive changes to VOC
control provisions that apply in
Aransas, Bexar, Calhoun, Matagorda,
San Patricio and Travis Counties.
The DFW area consists of Collin,
Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman,
Parker, Rockwall and Tarrant Counties.
The DFW area was reclassified as
serious ozone nonattainment for the
1997 ozone standard (75 FR 79302,
December 20, 2010). The SIP revision
for storage tanks was adopted by Texas
to meet the CAA RACT requirements for
the VOC storage emission source
category in serious ozone nonattainment
areas. In the DFW area the revision (1)
requires control of VOC flash emissions
from storage tanks in the DFW area that
might otherwise emit 50 tons per year
(tpy) of VOC or more, (2) adds
requirements for low-leaking storage
tank fittings and (3) limits situations
when a floating roof storage tank is
allowed to emit VOCs because the roof
is not floating on the stored VOC liquid.
The revision also adds a requirement
for the DFW and HGB areas that a vapor
recovery unit used for VOC control must
be designed to process all VOC vapor
generated by the maximum crude oil
and condensate throughput of the
storage tank and must transfer recovered
vapors to a pipe or container that is
vapor-tight. The HGB area consists of
Brazoria, Chambers, Fort Bend,
Galveston, Harris, Liberty, Montgomery
and Waller counties. The HGB area is
classified as a severe ozone
nonattainment area for the 1997 ozone
NAAQS (73 FR 56983, October 1, 2008).
In the DFW, HGB and BPA areas and
in El Paso, Gregg, Nueces and Victoria
Counties the revision (1) adds an
explicit requirement that any flare used
for control must be designed and
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 9, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
operated according to 40 CFR 60.18(b)—
(f) as amended through December 22,
2008, and (2) amends monitoring and
testing requirements that ensure
effectiveness of VOC controls. The BPA
area consists of Hardin, Jefferson, and
Orange Counties.
VOC control requirements for storage
tanks also apply in Aransas, Bexar,
Calhoun, Matagorda, San Patricio, and
Travis Counties. The revision did not
substantially change requirements for
these counties.
The SIP revision submitted by Texas
may be accessed online at
www.regulations.gov, Docket No. EPA–
R06–OAR–2012–0096.
C. CAA Requirements for the SIP
Revision
The primary CAA requirements
pertaining to the SIP revision submitted
by Texas are found in CAA sections
110(l) and 182(b)(2). CAA section 110(l)
requires that a SIP revision submitted to
EPA be adopted after reasonable notice
and public hearing. Section 110(l) also
requires that we not approve a SIP
revision if the revision would interfere
with any applicable requirement
concerning attainment and reasonable
further progress, or any other applicable
requirement of the CAA. CAA section
182(b)(2) requires that ozone
nonattainment areas classified as
moderate or above implement RACT
controls on all major VOC and NOX
emission sources and on all sources and
source categories covered by a control
technique guideline (CTG) issued by us.
RACT is defined as the lowest emissions
limitation that a particular source is
capable of meeting by the application of
control technology that is reasonably
available considering technological and
economic feasibility (44 FR 53762,
September 17, 1979). The CTG and
Alternative Control Technique (ACT)
documents that we issue provide states
with guidance concerning what types of
controls could constitute RACT for a
given source category. The documents
we have issued pertaining to storage
tanks are (1) Control of Volatile Organic
Emissions from Storage of Petroleum
Liquids in Fixed-Roof Tanks (EPA–450/
2–77–036, December 1977), (2) Control
of Volatile Organic Emissions from
Petroleum Liquid Storage in External
Floating Roof Tanks (EPA–450/2–78–
047, December 1978) and (3) Alternative
Control Techniques Document—Volatile
Organic Liquid Storage In Floating and
Fixed Roof Tanks (EPA–453/R–94–001,
January 1994). These documents are
accessible online at www.epa.gov/
airquality/ozonepollution/SIPToolkit/
ctgs.html. Because the DFW area was
classified as a serious ozone
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Sep 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
nonattainment area, a major source is a
source having the potential to emit 50
tpy of VOC or more (CAA 182(c)).
Because the HGB area is classified as a
severe ozone nonattainment area, a
major source is a source having the
potential to emit 25 tpy of VOC or more
(CAA 182(d)).
II. EPA’s Evaluation
VOC flash emissions occur during
transfer of the VOCs from a higher
pressure storage tank to a lower pressure
tank, reservoir, or other container.
Floating roof landing loss emissions
occur when the liquid level in a floating
roof tank is lowered and the roof rests
(lands) on the legs, or supports, rather
than on the liquid, severely limiting the
VOC control efficiency of the floating
roof. The storage tank requirements, to
control flash emissions, use low-leaking
tank fittings and further limit emissions
from floating roof storage tanks were
previously implemented in the HGB
area and approved by us as RACT (75
FR 15348, March 29, 2010). For the
DFW area, we previously found that
Texas rules for storage tanks met RACT
requirements (64 FR 3841, January 26,
1999 and 74 FR 1903, January 14, 2009).
The RACT rules must address major
sources that have the potential to emit
50 tpy of VOC or more in the DFW area
(serious area requirement) and 25 tpy of
VOC or more in the HGB area (severe
area requirement).
Our evaluation found that the revision
to the Texas SIP (1) improves the rules
that were previously approved, (2)
results in additional VOC reductions in
the DFW area and (3) ensures that RACT
is met for storage tanks with flash
emissions in the DFW area and
continues to be met in the HGB area.
Additionally we found that (1) Texas
adopted after reasonable notice and
public hearing and (2) approval would
not interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress or any other
applicable requirement of the CAA. A
technical support document (TSD) was
prepared which details our evaluation.
Our TSD may be accessed online at
www.regulations.gov, Docket No. EPA–
R06–OAR–2012–0096.
III. Final Action
We are approving a Texas SIP revision
for control of VOC emissions from
storage tanks adopted on December 7,
2011, and submitted on January 17,
2012. The revision (1) revises 30 TAC
§§ 115.110, 115.112–115.117, and
115.119 and (2) adds new 30 TAC
§§ 115.111 and 115.118. The revision (1)
implements additional VOC controls for
storage tanks in the DFW area; (2)
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53301
modifies VOC control requirements in
the DFW area, the BPA area, the HGB
area and the counties of El Paso, Gregg,
Nueces and Victoria and (3) makes nonsubstantive changes to VOC control
provisions that apply in Aransas, Bexar,
Calhoun, Matagorda, San Patricio and
Travis Counties. In addition, we find
that this revision implements serious
area RACT controls for the VOC storage
source category in the DFW area for the
1997 ozone NAAQS and continues to
implement severe area RACT controls
for this source category in the HGB area.
We are publishing this rule without
prior proposal because we view this as
a non-controversial amendment and
anticipate no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register publication, we
are publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
SIP revision if relevant adverse
comments are received. This rule will
be effective on November 10, 2014
without further notice unless we receive
relevant adverse comment by October 9,
2014. If we receive relevant adverse
comments, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. We will address all
public comments in a subsequent final
rule based on the proposed rule. We
will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so
now. Please note that if we receive
relevant adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
we may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
53302
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 9, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by November 10, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: August 22, 2014.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS—Texas
2. In § 52.2270 (c), the table titled
‘‘EPA Approved Regulations in the
Texas SIP’’ is amended by revising the
entries for sections 115.110, 115.112
through 115.117, and 115.119 and
adding in sequential order new entries
for sections 115.111 and 115.118.
The amendments read as follows:
■
§ 52.2270
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE TEXAS SIP
State citation
*
State
approval/
submittal date
Title/subject
*
*
EPA approval date
*
Explanation
*
*
*
Chapter 115 (Reg 5)—Control of Air Pollution from Volatile Organic Compounds
*
*
*
*
*
*
Subchapter B—General Volatile Organic Compound Sources
Division 1: Storage of Organic Compounds
Applicability and Definitions .......
12/1/2011
Section 115.111 ........
Exemptions .................................
12/1/2011
Section 115.112 ........
Control Requirements ................
12/1/2011
Section 115.113 ........
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Section 115.110 ........
Alternate Control Requirements
12/1/2011
Section 115.114 ........
Inspection Requirements ...........
12/1/2011
Section 115.115 ........
Monitoring Requirements ...........
12/1/2011
Section 115.116 ........
Testing Requirements ................
12/1/2011
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:34 Sep 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
9/9/2014 [Insert
ISTER citation].
9/9/2014 [Insert
ISTER citation].
9/9/2014 [Insert
ISTER citation].
9/9/2014 [Insert
ISTER citation].
9/9/2014 [Insert
ISTER citation].
9/9/2014 [Insert
ISTER citation].
9/9/2014 [Insert
ISTER citation].
Sfmt 4700
FEDERAL REGFEDERAL REGFEDERAL REGFEDERAL REGFEDERAL REGFEDERAL REGFEDERAL REG-
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
*
53303
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 9, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
EPA APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE TEXAS SIP—Continued
State
approval/
submittal date
State citation
Title/subject
Section 115.117 ........
Approved Test Methods .............
12/1/2011
Section 115.118 ........
Recordkeeping Requirements ....
12/1/2011
Section 115.119 ........
Compliance Schedules ..............
12/1/2011
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
EPA approval date
9/9/2014 [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation].
9/9/2014 [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation].
9/9/2014 [Insert FEDERAL REGISTER citation].
*
*
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
50 CFR Part 17
47 CFR Part 64
PART 64—MISCELLANEOUS RULES
RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERS
[CG Docket Nos. 13–24 and 03–123; FCC
13–118]
■
1. The authority citation for part 64
continues to read as follows:
Misuse of Internet Protocol (IP)
Captioned Telephone Service;
Correction
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 254(k);
403(b)(2)(B), (c), Pub. L. 104–104, 110 Stat.
56. Interpret or apply 47 U.S.C. 201, 218, 222,
225, 226, 227, 228, 254(k), 616, 620, and the
Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act
of 2012, Pub. L. 112–96, unless otherwise
noted.
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Technical amendments.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission (Commission) published in
the Federal Register on August 28,
2014, 79 FR 51450, amending its rules
for Internet Protocol Captioned
Telephone Service (IP CTS). That
document inadvertently removed
§ 64.604(c)(11)(iv) of the Commission’s
rules. This document corrects the final
regulations by adding back that section.
DATES: Effective September 9, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eliot
Greenwald, Disability Rights Office,
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau, at (202) 418–2235 (voice), or
email Eliot.Greenwald@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission published a document in
the Federal Register on August 30,
2013, 78 FR 53684, adding
§ 64.604(c)(11)(iv) of its rules for IP CTS.
In FR Doc. 2014–20433, published in
the Federal Register on August 28,
2014, 79 FR 51450, § 64.604(c)(11)(iv)
was inadvertently removed. This
correction reverses that removal and
adds § 64.604(c)(11)(iv) as published on
August 30, 2013, 78 FR 53684.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Individuals with disabilities,
Telecommunications.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Sep 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
*
Accordingly, 47 CFR part 64 is
corrected by making the following
technical amendment:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 64
*
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
*
[FR Doc. 2014–21306 Filed 9–8–14; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
Explanation
2. Amend § 64.604 by adding
paragraph (c)(11)(iv) to read as follows:
■
§ 64.604
Mandatory minimum standards.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(11) * * *
(iv) IP CTS providers shall maintain,
with each consumer’s registration
records, records describing any IP CTS
equipment provided, directly or
indirectly, to such consumer, stating the
amount paid for such equipment, and
stating whether the label required by
paragraph (c)(11)(iii) of this section was
affixed to such equipment prior to its
provision to the consumer. For
consumers to whom IP CTS equipment
was provided directly or indirectly prior
to the effective date of this paragraph
(c)(11), such records shall state whether
and when the label required by
paragraph (c)(11)(iii) of this section was
distributed to such consumer. Such
records shall be maintained for a
minimum period of five years after the
consumer ceases to obtain service from
the provider.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–21053 Filed 9–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Fish and Wildlife Service
[Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2013–0103;
4500030113]
RIN 1018–AZ10
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Endangered Species
Status for Agave eggersiana and
Gonocalyx concolor, and Threatened
Species Status for Varronia rupicola
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), determine
endangered species status under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act), for Agave eggersiana (no
common name) and Gonocalyx concolor
(no common name), and threatened
species status for Varronia rupicola (no
common name). These three plants are
endemic to the Caribbean. The effect of
this regulation will be to add these
species to the List of Endangered and
Threatened Plants.
DATES: This rule is effective October 9,
2014.
ADDRESSES: This final rule is available
on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov and https://
www.fws.gov/caribbean/es. Comments
and materials we received, as well as
supporting documentation we used in
preparing this rule, are available for
public inspection at https://
www.regulations.gov. All of the
comments, materials, and
documentation that we considered in
this rulemaking are available by
appointment, during normal business
hours at: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Caribbean Ecological Services Field
Office, P.O. Box 491, Road 301 Km. 5.1,
´
Boqueron, PR 00622; telephone 787–
851–7297.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09SER1.SGM
09SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53299-53303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21306]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R06-OAR-2012-0096; FRL-9916-32-Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas;
Revision to Control Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Storage
Tanks
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 53300]]
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a Texas
State Implementation (SIP) revision for control of volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from storage tanks. The revision implements
additional controls in the Dallas-Fort Worth 1997 ozone nonattainment
area (DFW area); modifies control requirements in the DFW area, the
Houston-Galveston-Brazoria ozone nonattainment area (HGB area), the
Beaumont-Port Arthur area (BPA area) and El Paso, Gregg, Nueces and
Victoria Counties; and makes non-substantive changes to VOC control
provisions that apply in Aransas, Bexar, Calhoun, Matagorda, San
Patricio and Travis Counties. In addition, EPA finds that the SIP
revision implements serious area reasonable available control
technology (RACT) controls for the VOC storage source category in the
DFW area and continues to implement severe area RACT for this source
category in the HGB area as required by the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on November 10, 2014 without further
notice, unless EPA receives relevant adverse comment by October 9,
2014. If EPA receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this rule
will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2012-0096, by one of the following methods:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions.
Email: Mr. Carl Young at young.carl@epa.gov.
Mail or delivery: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning
Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2012-
0096. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region 6,
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available at either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment with
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph
below or Mr. Bill Deese at 214-665-7253.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Young, (214) 665-6645,
young.carl@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. EPA's Evaluation
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
A. CAA and SIPs
Section 110 of the CAA requires states to develop and submit to EPA
a SIP to ensure that state air quality meets National Ambient Air
Quality Standards. These ambient standards currently address six
criteria pollutants: carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, lead,
particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide. Each federally-approved SIP
protects air quality primarily by addressing air pollution at its point
of origin through air pollution regulations and control strategies. EPA
approved SIP regulations and control strategies are federally
enforceable. As needed, States revise the SIP as needed and submit
revisions to EPA for approval.
B. SIP Revision Submitted on January 17, 2012
A SIP revision for controlling VOC emissions from storage tanks was
adopted by Texas on December 7, 2011, and submitted to us on January
17, 2012. VOCs are an ``ozone precursor'', as they react with oxygen,
nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sunlight to form ozone.
Controlling sources of VOC and NOX emissions can lower ozone levels in
the ambient air.
The revision amends Title 30, Chapter 115 of the Texas
Administrative Code (30 TAC 115) to (1) revise Sec. Sec. 115.110,
115.112-115.117, and 115.119, and (2) add new Sec. Sec. 115.111 and
115.118. The revision (1) implements additional VOC controls for
storage tanks in the DFW area; (2) modifies VOC control requirements in
the DFW area, the HGB area, the BPA area and El Paso, Gregg, Nueces and
Victoria Counties and (3) makes non-substantive changes to VOC control
provisions that apply in Aransas, Bexar, Calhoun, Matagorda, San
Patricio and Travis Counties.
The DFW area consists of Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson,
Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall and Tarrant Counties. The DFW area was
reclassified as serious ozone nonattainment for the 1997 ozone standard
(75 FR 79302, December 20, 2010). The SIP revision for storage tanks
was adopted by Texas to meet the CAA RACT requirements for the VOC
storage emission source category in serious ozone nonattainment areas.
In the DFW area the revision (1) requires control of VOC flash
emissions from storage tanks in the DFW area that might otherwise emit
50 tons per year (tpy) of VOC or more, (2) adds requirements for low-
leaking storage tank fittings and (3) limits situations when a floating
roof storage tank is allowed to emit VOCs because the roof is not
floating on the stored VOC liquid.
The revision also adds a requirement for the DFW and HGB areas that
a vapor recovery unit used for VOC control must be designed to process
all VOC vapor generated by the maximum crude oil and condensate
throughput of the storage tank and must transfer recovered vapors to a
pipe or container that is vapor-tight. The HGB area consists of
Brazoria, Chambers, Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, Liberty, Montgomery
and Waller counties. The HGB area is classified as a severe ozone
nonattainment area for the 1997 ozone NAAQS (73 FR 56983, October 1,
2008).
In the DFW, HGB and BPA areas and in El Paso, Gregg, Nueces and
Victoria Counties the revision (1) adds an explicit requirement that
any flare used for control must be designed and
[[Page 53301]]
operated according to 40 CFR 60.18(b)--(f) as amended through December
22, 2008, and (2) amends monitoring and testing requirements that
ensure effectiveness of VOC controls. The BPA area consists of Hardin,
Jefferson, and Orange Counties.
VOC control requirements for storage tanks also apply in Aransas,
Bexar, Calhoun, Matagorda, San Patricio, and Travis Counties. The
revision did not substantially change requirements for these counties.
The SIP revision submitted by Texas may be accessed online at
www.regulations.gov, Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2012-0096.
C. CAA Requirements for the SIP Revision
The primary CAA requirements pertaining to the SIP revision
submitted by Texas are found in CAA sections 110(l) and 182(b)(2). CAA
section 110(l) requires that a SIP revision submitted to EPA be adopted
after reasonable notice and public hearing. Section 110(l) also
requires that we not approve a SIP revision if the revision would
interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress, or any other applicable requirement of the
CAA. CAA section 182(b)(2) requires that ozone nonattainment areas
classified as moderate or above implement RACT controls on all major
VOC and NOX emission sources and on all sources and source
categories covered by a control technique guideline (CTG) issued by us.
RACT is defined as the lowest emissions limitation that a particular
source is capable of meeting by the application of control technology
that is reasonably available considering technological and economic
feasibility (44 FR 53762, September 17, 1979). The CTG and Alternative
Control Technique (ACT) documents that we issue provide states with
guidance concerning what types of controls could constitute RACT for a
given source category. The documents we have issued pertaining to
storage tanks are (1) Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from
Storage of Petroleum Liquids in Fixed-Roof Tanks (EPA-450/2-77-036,
December 1977), (2) Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from
Petroleum Liquid Storage in External Floating Roof Tanks (EPA-450/2-78-
047, December 1978) and (3) Alternative Control Techniques Document--
Volatile Organic Liquid Storage In Floating and Fixed Roof Tanks (EPA-
453/R-94-001, January 1994). These documents are accessible online at
www.epa.gov/airquality/ozonepollution/SIPToolkit/ctgs.html. Because the
DFW area was classified as a serious ozone nonattainment area, a major
source is a source having the potential to emit 50 tpy of VOC or more
(CAA 182(c)). Because the HGB area is classified as a severe ozone
nonattainment area, a major source is a source having the potential to
emit 25 tpy of VOC or more (CAA 182(d)).
II. EPA's Evaluation
VOC flash emissions occur during transfer of the VOCs from a higher
pressure storage tank to a lower pressure tank, reservoir, or other
container. Floating roof landing loss emissions occur when the liquid
level in a floating roof tank is lowered and the roof rests (lands) on
the legs, or supports, rather than on the liquid, severely limiting the
VOC control efficiency of the floating roof. The storage tank
requirements, to control flash emissions, use low-leaking tank fittings
and further limit emissions from floating roof storage tanks were
previously implemented in the HGB area and approved by us as RACT (75
FR 15348, March 29, 2010). For the DFW area, we previously found that
Texas rules for storage tanks met RACT requirements (64 FR 3841,
January 26, 1999 and 74 FR 1903, January 14, 2009). The RACT rules must
address major sources that have the potential to emit 50 tpy of VOC or
more in the DFW area (serious area requirement) and 25 tpy of VOC or
more in the HGB area (severe area requirement).
Our evaluation found that the revision to the Texas SIP (1)
improves the rules that were previously approved, (2) results in
additional VOC reductions in the DFW area and (3) ensures that RACT is
met for storage tanks with flash emissions in the DFW area and
continues to be met in the HGB area. Additionally we found that (1)
Texas adopted after reasonable notice and public hearing and (2)
approval would not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning
attainment and reasonable further progress or any other applicable
requirement of the CAA. A technical support document (TSD) was prepared
which details our evaluation. Our TSD may be accessed online at
www.regulations.gov, Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2012-0096.
III. Final Action
We are approving a Texas SIP revision for control of VOC emissions
from storage tanks adopted on December 7, 2011, and submitted on
January 17, 2012. The revision (1) revises 30 TAC Sec. Sec. 115.110,
115.112-115.117, and 115.119 and (2) adds new 30 TAC Sec. Sec. 115.111
and 115.118. The revision (1) implements additional VOC controls for
storage tanks in the DFW area; (2) modifies VOC control requirements in
the DFW area, the BPA area, the HGB area and the counties of El Paso,
Gregg, Nueces and Victoria and (3) makes non-substantive changes to VOC
control provisions that apply in Aransas, Bexar, Calhoun, Matagorda,
San Patricio and Travis Counties. In addition, we find that this
revision implements serious area RACT controls for the VOC storage
source category in the DFW area for the 1997 ozone NAAQS and continues
to implement severe area RACT controls for this source category in the
HGB area.
We are publishing this rule without prior proposal because we view
this as a non-controversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if relevant adverse
comments are received. This rule will be effective on November 10, 2014
without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse comment by
October 9, 2014. If we receive relevant adverse comments, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the
public that the rule will not take effect. We will address all public
comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. We will
not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so now. Please note that if we receive
relevant adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this
rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the
rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not
the subject of an adverse comment.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions
[[Page 53302]]
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 10, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: August 22, 2014.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS--Texas
0
2. In Sec. 52.2270 (c), the table titled ``EPA Approved Regulations in
the Texas SIP'' is amended by revising the entries for sections
115.110, 115.112 through 115.117, and 115.119 and adding in sequential
order new entries for sections 115.111 and 115.118.
The amendments read as follows:
Sec. 52.2270 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA Approved Regulations in the Texas SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State approval/
State citation Title/subject submittal EPA approval date Explanation
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 115 (Reg 5)--Control of Air Pollution from Volatile Organic Compounds
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter B--General Volatile Organic Compound Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Division 1: Storage of Organic Compounds
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 115.110................ Applicability and 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert ...................
Definitions. Federal Register
citation].
Section 115.111................ Exemptions.......... 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert ...................
Federal Register
citation].
Section 115.112................ Control Requirements 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert ...................
Federal Register
citation].
Section 115.113................ Alternate Control 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert ...................
Requirements. Federal Register
citation].
Section 115.114................ Inspection 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert ...................
Requirements. Federal Register
citation].
Section 115.115................ Monitoring 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert ...................
Requirements. Federal Register
citation].
Section 115.116................ Testing Requirements 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert ...................
Federal Register
citation].
[[Page 53303]]
Section 115.117................ Approved Test 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert ...................
Methods. Federal Register
citation].
Section 115.118................ Recordkeeping 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert ...................
Requirements. Federal Register
citation].
Section 115.119................ Compliance Schedules 12/1/2011 9/9/2014 [Insert ...................
Federal Register
citation].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-21306 Filed 9-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P