Special Conditions: Airbus Model A350-900 Airplane; Electronic System-Security Protection From Unauthorized External Access, 53128-53129 [2014-21243]
Download as PDF
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
53128
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 173 / Monday, September 8, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
commitment fee on the outstanding
balance of those loans in monthly
installments based on the outstanding
balance of those loans.
Market risk means the risk to your
financial condition because the value of
your holdings may decline if interest
rates or market prices change. Exposure
to market risk is measured by assessing
the effect of changing rates and prices
on either the earnings or economic
value of an individual instrument, a
portfolio, or the entire Corporation.
Maturing obligations means maturing
debt and other obligations that may be
expected, such as buyouts of long-term
standby purchase commitments or
repurchases of agricultural mortgage
securities.
Mortgage securities means securities
that are either:
(1) Pass-through securities or
participation certificates that represent
ownership of a fractional undivided
interest in a specified pool of residential
(excluding home equity loans),
multifamily or commercial mortgages,
or
(2) A multiclass security (including
collateralized mortgage obligations and
real estate mortgage investment
conduits) that is backed by a pool of
residential, multifamily or commercial
real estate mortgages, pass-through
mortgage securities, or other multiclass
mortgage securities.
(3) This definition does not include
agricultural mortgage-backed securities
guaranteed by Farmer Mac itself.
Nationally recognized statistical
rating organization (NRSRO) means a
rating organization that the Securities
and Exchange Commission recognizes
as an NRSRO.
Non-program investments means
investments other than those in:
(1) ‘‘Qualified loans’’ as defined in
section 8.0(9) of the Farm Credit Act of
1971, as amended; or
(2) Securities collateralized by
‘‘qualified loans.’’
OSMO means FCA’s Office of
Secondary Market Oversight.
Program assets means on-balance
sheet ‘‘qualified loans’’ as defined in
section 8.0(9) of the Farm Credit Act of
1971, as amended.
Program obligations means offbalance sheet ‘‘qualified loans’’ as
defined in section 8.0(9) of the Farm
Credit Act of 1971, as amended.
Regulatory capital means your core
capital plus an allowance for losses and
guarantee claims, as determined in
accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles.
Revenue bond means an obligation of
a municipal government that finances a
specific project or enterprise, but it is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Sep 05, 2014
Jkt 232001
not a full faith and credit obligation.
The obligor pays a portion of the
revenue generated by the project or
enterprise to the bondholders.
Weighted average life (WAL) means
the average time until the investor
receives the principal on a security,
weighted by the size of each principal
payment and calculated under specified
prepayment assumptions.
Dated: September 3, 2014.
Dale L. Aultman,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 2014–21319 Filed 9–5–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0909; Special
Conditions No. 25–533–SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Model
A350–900 Airplane; Electronic SystemSecurity Protection From Unauthorized
External Access
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for Airbus Model A350–900
airplanes. These airplanes will have a
novel or unusual design feature
associated with electronic systemsecurity protection from unauthorized
external access. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Effective Date: October 8, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Varun Khanna, FAA, Airplane and
Flightcrew Interface Branch, ANM–111,
Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–1298; facsimile
(425) 227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On August 25, 2008, Airbus applied
for a type certificate for their new Model
A350–900 airplane. Later, Airbus
requested, and the FAA approved, an
extension to the application for FAA
type certification to November 15, 2009.
The Model A350–900 airplane has a
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
conventional layout with twin wingmounted Rolls-Royce Trent XWB
engines. It features a twin-aisle, 9abreast, economy-class layout, and
accommodates side-by-side placement
of LD–3 containers in the cargo
compartment. The basic Model A350–
900 airplane configuration
accommodates 315 passengers in a
standard two-class arrangement. The
design cruise speed is Mach 0.85 with
a maximum take-off weight of 602,000
lbs.
Contemporary transport-category
airplanes have both safety-related and
non-safety-related electronic system
networks for many operational
functions. However, electronic systemnetwork-security considerations and
functions have played a relatively minor
role in the certification of such systems
because of the isolation, protection
mechanisms, and limited connectivity
between the different networks.
Type Certification Basis
Under Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, Airbus must
show that the Model A350–900 airplane
meets the applicable provisions of 14
CFR part 25, as amended by
Amendments 25–1 through 25–129.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Model A350–900 series because
of a novel or unusual design feature,
special conditions are prescribed under
§ 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model A350–900
airplane must comply with the fuel-vent
and exhaust-emission requirements of
14 CFR part 34, and the noisecertification requirements of 14 CFR
part 36. The FAA must issue a finding
of regulatory adequacy under § 611 of
Public Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise Control
Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, under § 11.38,
and they become part of the typecertification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Airbus Model A350–900 airplane
will incorporate the following novel or
unusual design feature:
E:\FR\FM\08SER1.SGM
08SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 173 / Monday, September 8, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
The digital systems architecture for
the Airbus Model A350–900 airplane is
composed of several connected
networks. This network architecture is
used for a diverse set of functions,
providing data connectivity between
systems, including:
1. Airplane control, communication,
display, monitoring and navigation
systems,
2. Operator business and
administrative support systems,
3. Passenger entertainment systems,
and
4. Access by systems external to the
airplane.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Discussion
The Airbus Model A350–900 airplane
network architecture and configuration
may allow increased connectivity to,
and access from, external network
sources, and operator operations and
maintenance networks to the airplane
control domain and operatorinformation-services domain. The
airplane-control domain and operatorinformation-services domain perform
functions required for the safe operation
and maintenance of the airplane.
Previously, these domains had very
limited connectivity with external
network sources. The network
architecture and configuration may
allow the exploitation of networksecurity vulnerabilities resulting in
intentional or unintentional destruction,
disruption, degradation, or exploitation
of data, systems, and networks critical
to the safety and maintenance of the
airplane.
The existing regulations and guidance
material did not anticipate these types
of airplane system architectures.
Furthermore, 14 CFR regulations and
current system-safety assessment policy
and techniques do not address potential
security vulnerabilities, which could be
exploited by unauthorized access to
airplane networks, data buses, and
servers. Therefore, these special
conditions are to ensure that
unauthorized wired or wireless
electronic connections do not
compromise the security (i.e.,
confidentiality, integrity, and
availability) of airplane systems.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
Discussion of Comments
Notice of proposed special conditions
No. 25–13–17–SC for the Airbus Model
A350–900 airplane was published in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Sep 05, 2014
Jkt 232001
Federal Register on December 17, 2013
(78 FR 76251)
Comment From Airbus
Airbus had one comment about the
following wording of the first paragraph
of the Proposed Special Conditions:
The applicant must ensure airplane
electronic system security protection
from access to or by unauthorized
sources external to the airplane,
including those possibly caused by
maintenance activity.
Airbus considers that the wording ‘‘to
or by’’ is incorrect. The protection must
prevent access from unauthorized
sources external to the airplane only.
The requirement of protection to
unauthorized sources external to the
airplane, is not relevant.
Therefore, Airbus suggests that the
wording be modified as follows:
The applicant must ensure airplane
electronic system security protection
from access by unauthorized sources
external to the airplane, including those
possibly caused by maintenance
activity.
53129
external to the airplane, including those
possibly caused by maintenance
activity.
2. The applicant must ensure that
electronic system-security threats are
identified and assessed, and that
effective electronic system-security
protection strategies are implemented to
protect the airplane from all adverse
impacts on safety, functionality, and
continued airworthiness.
3. The applicant must establish
appropriate procedures to allow the
operator to ensure that continued
airworthiness of the airplane is
maintained, including all post-typecertification modifications that may
have an impact on the approved
electronic system-security safeguards.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
15, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–21243 Filed 9–5–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
FAA Response
The FAA agrees with Airbus and has
changed the special conditions
accordingly.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions apply to Airbus Model
A350–900 series airplanes. Should
Airbus apply later for a change to the
type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
[Docket No. FAA–2013–1002; Special
Conditions No. 25–530–SC]
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on the Airbus
Model A350–900 series airplanes. It is
not a rule of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the following special conditions are
issued as part of the type-certification
basis for Airbus Model A350–900 series
airplanes.
1. The applicant must ensure airplane
electronic system-security protection
from access by unauthorized sources
■
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
Special Conditions: Airbus Model
A350–900 Airplane; Lightning
Protection of Fuel-Tank Structure To
Prevent Fuel-Tank Vapor Ignition
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for Airbus Model A350–900
airplanes.
These airplanes will have a novel or
unusual design feature that will
incorporate a nitrogen generation
system (NGS) for all fuel tanks, to
actively reduce flammability exposure
within the fuel tanks significantly below
that required by the fuel-tank
flammability regulations. Among other
benefits, the NGS significantly reduces
the potential for fuel-vapor ignition
caused by lightning strikes. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for this design feature.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: Effective Date: October 8, 2014.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08SER1.SGM
08SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 173 (Monday, September 8, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53128-53129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21243]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0909; Special Conditions No. 25-533-SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Model A350-900 Airplane; Electronic
System-Security Protection From Unauthorized External Access
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for Airbus Model A350-900
airplanes. These airplanes will have a novel or unusual design feature
associated with electronic system-security protection from unauthorized
external access. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not
contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design
feature. These special conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a
level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: Effective Date: October 8, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Varun Khanna, FAA, Airplane and
Flightcrew Interface Branch, ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1298; facsimile (425) 227-
1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 25, 2008, Airbus applied for a type certificate for their
new Model A350-900 airplane. Later, Airbus requested, and the FAA
approved, an extension to the application for FAA type certification to
November 15, 2009. The Model A350-900 airplane has a conventional
layout with twin wing-mounted Rolls-Royce Trent XWB engines. It
features a twin-aisle, 9-abreast, economy-class layout, and
accommodates side-by-side placement of LD-3 containers in the cargo
compartment. The basic Model A350-900 airplane configuration
accommodates 315 passengers in a standard two-class arrangement. The
design cruise speed is Mach 0.85 with a maximum take-off weight of
602,000 lbs.
Contemporary transport-category airplanes have both safety-related
and non-safety-related electronic system networks for many operational
functions. However, electronic system-network-security considerations
and functions have played a relatively minor role in the certification
of such systems because of the isolation, protection mechanisms, and
limited connectivity between the different networks.
Type Certification Basis
Under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, Airbus
must show that the Model A350-900 airplane meets the applicable
provisions of 14 CFR part 25, as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-
129.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Model A350-900 series because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the
other model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model A350-900 airplane must comply with the fuel-vent
and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the noise-
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36. The FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under Sec. 611 of Public Law 92-574,
the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19,
under Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type-certification basis
under Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Airbus Model A350-900 airplane will incorporate the following
novel or unusual design feature:
[[Page 53129]]
The digital systems architecture for the Airbus Model A350-900
airplane is composed of several connected networks. This network
architecture is used for a diverse set of functions, providing data
connectivity between systems, including:
1. Airplane control, communication, display, monitoring and
navigation systems,
2. Operator business and administrative support systems,
3. Passenger entertainment systems, and
4. Access by systems external to the airplane.
Discussion
The Airbus Model A350-900 airplane network architecture and
configuration may allow increased connectivity to, and access from,
external network sources, and operator operations and maintenance
networks to the airplane control domain and operator-information-
services domain. The airplane-control domain and operator-information-
services domain perform functions required for the safe operation and
maintenance of the airplane. Previously, these domains had very limited
connectivity with external network sources. The network architecture
and configuration may allow the exploitation of network-security
vulnerabilities resulting in intentional or unintentional destruction,
disruption, degradation, or exploitation of data, systems, and networks
critical to the safety and maintenance of the airplane.
The existing regulations and guidance material did not anticipate
these types of airplane system architectures. Furthermore, 14 CFR
regulations and current system-safety assessment policy and techniques
do not address potential security vulnerabilities, which could be
exploited by unauthorized access to airplane networks, data buses, and
servers. Therefore, these special conditions are to ensure that
unauthorized wired or wireless electronic connections do not compromise
the security (i.e., confidentiality, integrity, and availability) of
airplane systems.
These special conditions contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of
safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness
standards.
Discussion of Comments
Notice of proposed special conditions No. 25-13-17-SC for the
Airbus Model A350-900 airplane was published in the Federal Register on
December 17, 2013 (78 FR 76251)
Comment From Airbus
Airbus had one comment about the following wording of the first
paragraph of the Proposed Special Conditions:
The applicant must ensure airplane electronic system security
protection from access to or by unauthorized sources external to the
airplane, including those possibly caused by maintenance activity.
Airbus considers that the wording ``to or by'' is incorrect. The
protection must prevent access from unauthorized sources external to
the airplane only. The requirement of protection to unauthorized
sources external to the airplane, is not relevant.
Therefore, Airbus suggests that the wording be modified as follows:
The applicant must ensure airplane electronic system security
protection from access by unauthorized sources external to the
airplane, including those possibly caused by maintenance activity.
FAA Response
The FAA agrees with Airbus and has changed the special conditions
accordingly.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions apply to Airbus Model
A350-900 series airplanes. Should Airbus apply later for a change to
the type certificate to include another model incorporating the same
novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to
that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on the Airbus Model A350-900 series airplanes. It is not a rule of
general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type-certification basis for Airbus Model A350-900 series
airplanes.
1. The applicant must ensure airplane electronic system-security
protection from access by unauthorized sources external to the
airplane, including those possibly caused by maintenance activity.
2. The applicant must ensure that electronic system-security
threats are identified and assessed, and that effective electronic
system-security protection strategies are implemented to protect the
airplane from all adverse impacts on safety, functionality, and
continued airworthiness.
3. The applicant must establish appropriate procedures to allow the
operator to ensure that continued airworthiness of the airplane is
maintained, including all post-type-certification modifications that
may have an impact on the approved electronic system-security
safeguards.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 15, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-21243 Filed 9-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P