Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in Alaska; Harvest Regulations for Migratory Birds in Alaska During the 2015 Season, 53119-53125 [2014-21195]
Download as PDF
Vol. 79
Friday,
No. 172
September 5, 2014
Part II
Department of the Interior
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 92
Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in Alaska; Harvest Regulations for
Migratory Birds in Alaska During the 2015 Season; Proposed Rule
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:30 Sep 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4717
Sfmt 4717
E:\FR\FM\05SEP2.SGM
05SEP2
53120
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 172 / Friday, September 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Donna Dewhurst, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 1011 E. Tudor Road, Mail Stop
201, Anchorage, AK 99503; (907) 786–
3499.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 92
[Docket No. FWS–R7–MB–2014–0036;
FF09M21200–145–FXMB1231099BPP0]
RIN 1018–BA48
Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in
Alaska; Harvest Regulations for
Migratory Birds in Alaska During the
2015 Season
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service or we) is proposing
migratory bird subsistence harvest
regulations in Alaska for the 2015
season. These regulations allow for the
continuation of customary and
traditional subsistence uses of migratory
birds in Alaska and prescribe regional
information on when and where the
harvesting of birds may occur. These
regulations were developed under a comanagement process involving the
Service, the Alaska Department of Fish
and Game, and Alaska Native
representatives. The rulemaking is
necessary because the regulations
governing the subsistence harvest of
migratory birds in Alaska are subject to
annual review. This rulemaking
proposes region-specific regulations that
would go into effect on April 2, 2015,
and expire on August 31, 2015.
DATES: We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before
November 4, 2014. We must receive
requests for public hearings, in writing,
at the address shown in FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT by October 20,
2014.
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments
by one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments to
Docket No. FWS–R7–MB–2014–0036.
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: FWS–R7–
MB–2014–0036; Division of Policy and
Directives Management; U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; 5275 Leesburg Place,
MS: BPHC; Falls Church, VA 22041–
3803.
We will not accept email or faxes. We
will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see the
Public Comment Procedures section,
below, for more information).
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:30 Sep 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
Public Comment Procedures
To ensure that any action resulting
from this proposed rule will be as
accurate and as effective as possible, we
request that you send relevant
information for our consideration. The
comments that will be most useful and
likely to influence our decisions are
those that you support by quantitative
information or studies and those that
include citations to, and analyses of, the
applicable laws and regulations. Please
make your comments as specific as
possible and explain the basis for them.
In addition, please include sufficient
information with your comments to
allow us to authenticate any scientific or
commercial data you include.
You must submit your comments and
materials concerning this proposed rule
by one of the methods listed above in
the ADDRESSES section. We will not
accept comments sent by email or fax or
to an address not listed in ADDRESSES.
If you submit a comment via https://
www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment—including any personal
identifying information, such as your
address, telephone number, or email
address—will be posted on the Web site.
When you submit a comment, the
system receives it immediately.
However, the comment will not be
publicly viewable until we post it,
which might not occur until several
days after submission.
If you mail or hand-carry a hardcopy
comment directly to us that includes
personal information, you may request
at the top of your document that we
withhold this information from public
review. However, we cannot guarantee
that we will be able to do so. To ensure
that the electronic docket for this
rulemaking is complete and all
comments we receive are publicly
available, we will post all hardcopy
comments on https://
www.regulations.gov.
In addition, comments and materials
we receive, as well as supporting
documentation used in preparing this
proposed rule, will be available for
public inspection in two ways:
(1) You can view them on https://
www.regulations.gov. Search for FWS–
R7–MB–2014–0036, which is the docket
number for this rulemaking.
(2) You can make an appointment,
during normal business hours, to view
the comments and materials in person at
the Division of Migratory Bird
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Management, MS: MB, 5275 Leesburg
Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–3803.
Public Availability of Comments
As stated above in more detail, before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Why is this rulemaking necessary?
This rulemaking is necessary because,
by law, the migratory bird harvest
season is closed unless opened by the
Secretary of the Interior, and the
regulations governing subsistence
harvest of migratory birds in Alaska are
subject to public review and annual
approval. This rule proposes regulations
for the taking of migratory birds for
subsistence uses in Alaska during the
spring and summer of 2015. This rule
also sets forth a list of migratory bird
season openings and closures in Alaska
by region.
How do I find the history of these
regulations?
Background information, including
past events leading to this rulemaking,
accomplishments since the Migratory
Bird Treaties with Canada and Mexico
were amended, and a history, were
originally addressed in the Federal
Register on August 16, 2002 (67 FR
53511) and most recently on April 8,
2014 (79 FR 19454).
Recent Federal Register documents,
all final rules setting forth the annual
harvest regulations, are available at
https://www.fws.gov/alaska/ambcc/
regulations.htm or by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
What is the process for issuing
regulations for the subsistence harvest
of migratory birds in Alaska?
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service or we) is proposing migratory
bird subsistence harvest regulations in
Alaska for the 2015 season. These
regulations allow for the continuation of
customary and traditional subsistence
uses of migratory birds in Alaska and
prescribe regional information on when
and where the harvesting of birds may
occur. These regulations were
developed under a co-management
process involving the Service, the
E:\FR\FM\05SEP2.SGM
05SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 172 / Friday, September 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Alaska Department of Fish and Game,
and Alaska Native representatives.
We opened the process to establish
regulations for the 2015 spring and
summer subsistence harvest of
migratory birds in Alaska in a proposed
rule published in the Federal Register
on April 30, 2014 (79 FR 24512), to
amend 50 CFR part 20. While that
proposed rule primarily addressed the
regulatory process for hunting migratory
birds for all purposes throughout the
United States, we also discussed the
background and history of Alaska
subsistence regulations, explained the
annual process for their establishment,
and requested proposals for the 2015
season. The rulemaking processes for
both types of migratory bird harvest are
related, and the April 30, 2014,
proposed rule explained the connection
between the two.
The Alaska Migratory Bird Comanagement Council (Co-management
Council) held meetings on April 10–11,
2014, to develop recommendations for
changes that would take effect during
the 2015 harvest season. No changes
were recommended, and this was
presented first to the Pacific Flyway
Council and then to the Service
Regulations Committee (SRC) for
approval at the committee’s meeting on
July 30, 2014.
Who is eligible to hunt under these
regulations?
Eligibility to harvest under the
regulations established in 2003 was
limited to permanent residents,
regardless of race, in villages located
within the Alaska Peninsula, Kodiak
Archipelago, the Aleutian Islands, and
in areas north and west of the Alaska
Range (50 CFR 92.5). These geographical
restrictions opened the initial migratory
bird subsistence harvest to about 13
percent of Alaska residents. Highpopulated, roaded areas such as
Anchorage, the Matanuska-Susitna and
Fairbanks North Star boroughs, the
Kenai Peninsula roaded area, the Gulf of
Alaska roaded area, and Southeast
Alaska were excluded from eligible
subsistence harvest areas.
Based on petitions requesting
inclusion in the harvest in 2004, we
added 13 additional communities based
on criteria set forth in 50 CFR 92.5(c).
These communities were Gulkana,
Gakona, Tazlina, Copper Center,
Mentasta Lake, Chitina, Chistochina,
Tatitlek, Chenega, Port Graham,
Nanwalek, Tyonek, and Hoonah, with a
combined population of 2,766. In 2005,
we added three additional communities
for glaucous-winged gull egg gathering
only, based on petitions requesting
inclusion. These southeastern
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:30 Sep 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
communities were Craig, Hydaburg, and
Yakutat, with a combined population of
2,459, based on the latest census
information at that time.
In 2007, we enacted the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game’s request
to expand the Fairbanks North Star
Borough excluded area to include the
Central Interior area. This action
excluded the following communities
from participation in this harvest: Big
Delta/Fort Greely, Healy, McKinley
Park/Village, and Ferry, with a
combined population of 2,812.
In 2012, we received a request from
the Native Village of Eyak to include
Cordova, Alaska, for a limited season
that would legalize the traditional
gathering of gull eggs and the hunting of
waterfowl during spring. This request
resulted in a new, limited harvest of
spring waterfowl and gull eggs starting
in 2014.
What is different in the region-specific
regulations for 2015?
There are no changes from the 2014
regulations.
How will the service ensure that the
subsistence harvest will not raise
overall migratory bird harvest or
threaten the conservation of
endangered and threatened species?
We have monitored subsistence
harvest for the past 25 years through the
use of household surveys in the most
heavily used subsistence harvest areas,
such as the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta. In
recent years, more intensive surveys
combined with outreach efforts focused
on species identification have been
added to improve the accuracy of
information gathered from regions still
reporting some subsistence harvest of
listed or candidate species.
Spectacled and Steller’s Eiders
Spectacled eiders (Somateria fischeri)
and the Alaska-breeding population of
Steller’s eiders (Polysticta stelleri) are
listed as threatened species. Their
migration and breeding distribution
overlap with areas where the spring and
summer subsistence migratory bird hunt
is open in Alaska. Both species are
closed to hunting, although harvest
surveys and Service documentation
indicate both species have been taken in
several regions of Alaska.
The Service has dual objectives and
responsibilities for authorizing a
subsistence harvest while protecting
migratory birds and threatened species.
Although these objectives continue to be
challenging, they are not irreconcilable,
provided that regulations continue to
protect threatened species, measures to
address documented threats are
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
53121
implemented, and the subsistence
community and other conservation
partners commit to working together.
With these dual objectives in mind, the
Service, working with North Slope
partners, developed measures in 2009,
to further reduce the potential for
shooting mortality or injury of closed
species. These conservation measures
included: (1) Increased waterfowl
hunter outreach and community
awareness through partnering with the
North Slope Migratory Bird Task Force;
and (2) continued enforcement of the
migratory bird regulations that are
protective of listed eiders.
This proposed rule continues to focus
on the North Slope from Barrow to Point
Hope because Steller’s eiders from the
listed Alaska breeding population are
known to breed and migrate there.
These regulations are designed to
address several ongoing eider
management needs by clarifying for
subsistence users that (1) Service law
enforcement personnel have authority to
verify species of birds possessed by
hunters, and (2) it is illegal to possess
any species of bird closed to harvest.
This rule also describes how the
Service’s existing authority of
emergency closure will be implemented,
if necessary, to protect Steller’s eiders.
We are always willing to discuss
regulations with our partners on the
North Slope to ensure protection of
closed species as well as provide
subsistence hunters an opportunity to
harvest migratory birds in a way that
maintains the culture and traditional
harvest of the community. The
regulations pertaining to bag checks and
possession of illegal birds are deemed
necessary to verify that no closed eider
species are taken during the legal
subsistence hunt.
The Service is aware of and
appreciates the considerable efforts by
North Slope partners to raise awareness
and educate hunters on Steller’s eider
conservation via the bird fair, meetings,
radio shows, signs, school visits, and
one-on-one contacts. We also recognize
that no listed eiders have been
documented shot from 2009 through
2012, even though Steller’s eiders
nested in the Barrow area during that
time. One Steller’s eider and one
spectacled eider were found shot during
the summer of 2013; both incidents
were investigated by the Service. No
listed eiders were found or reported
shot in 2014. The Service acknowledges
progress made with the other eider
conservation measures including
partnering with the North Slope
Migratory Bird Task Force for increased
waterfowl hunter awareness, continued
enforcement of the regulations, and in-
E:\FR\FM\05SEP2.SGM
05SEP2
53122
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 172 / Friday, September 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
season verification of the harvest. To
reduce the threat of shooting mortality
of threatened eiders, we continue to
work with North Slope partners to
conduct education and outreach. In
addition, the emergency closure
authority provides another level of
assurance if an unexpected number of
Steller’s eiders are killed by shooting
(50 CFR 92.21 and 50 CFR 92.32).
In-season harvest monitoring
information will be used to evaluate the
efficacy of regulations, conservation
measures, and outreach efforts.
Conservation measures are being
continued by the Service, with the
amount of effort and emphasis being
based on regulatory adherence.
Specifically, local communities have
continued to develop greater
responsibility for taking actions to
ensure Steller’s and spectacled eider
conservation and recovery.
The longstanding general emergency
closure provision at 50 CFR 92.21
specifies that the harvest may be closed
or temporarily suspended upon finding
that a continuation of the regulation
allowing the harvest would pose an
imminent threat to the conservation of
any migratory bird population. With
regard to Steller’s eiders, the regulation
at 50 CFR 92.32, carried over from the
past 5 years, clarifies that we will take
action under 50 CFR 92.21 as is
necessary to prevent further take of
Steller’s eiders, and that action could
include temporary or long-term closures
of the harvest in all or a portion of the
geographic area open to harvest. If
mortality of threatened eiders occurs,
we will evaluate each mortality event by
criteria such as cause, quantity, sex, age,
location, and date. We will consult with
the Co-management Council when we
are considering an emergency closure. If
we determine that an emergency closure
is necessary, we will design it to
minimize its impact on the subsistence
harvest.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Yellow-Billed Loon
Yellow-billed loons (Gavia adamsii)
are a candidate species for listing under
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Their
migration and breeding distribution
overlaps the spring and summer
migratory bird hunt in Alaska. Yellowbilled loons are closed to hunting, but
harvest surveys have indicated that on
the North Slope and St. Lawrence Island
some take does occur. Most of the
yellow-billed loons taken on the North
Slope were found to be entangled loons
salvaged from subsistence fishing nets
as described below. The Service will
continue outreach efforts in both areas
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:30 Sep 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
in 2015, engaging partners to decrease
the take of yellow-billed loons.
Consistent with the request of the
North Slope Borough Fish and Game
Management Committee and the
recommendation of the Co-management
Council, this rule continues the
provisions originally established in
2005, to allow subsistence use of
yellow-billed loons inadvertently
entangled in subsistence fishing (gill)
nets on the North Slope. Yellow-billed
loons are culturally important to the
Inupiat Eskimo of the North Slope for
use in traditional dance regalia. A
maximum of 20 yellow-billed loons will
be allowed to be kept if found entangled
in fishing nets in 2015, under this
provision. This provision does not
authorize intentional harvest of yellowbilled loons, but allows use of those
loons inadvertently entangled during
normal subsistence fishing activities.
Endangered Species Act Consideration
Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act (16 U.S.C. 1536) requires the
Secretary of the Interior to ‘‘review other
programs administered by her and
utilize such programs in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act’’ and to ‘‘insure
that any action authorized, funded, or
carried out . . . is not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of
any endangered species or threatened
species or result in the destruction or
adverse modification of [critical]
habitat. . . .’’ Prior to issuance of
annual spring and summer subsistence
regulations, we would consult under
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (Act), to ensure
that the 2015 subsistence harvest is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of any species designated as
endangered or threatened, or modify or
destroy its critical habitats, and that the
regulations are consistent with
conservation programs for those species.
Consultation under section 7 of the Act
for the annual subsistence take
regulations may cause us to change
these regulations. Our biological
opinion resulting from the section 7
consultation is a public document that
will be available from the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Statutory Authority
We derive our authority to issue these
regulations from the Migratory Bird
Treaty Act of 1918, at 16 U.S.C. 712(1),
which authorizes the Secretary of the
Interior, in accordance with the treaties
with Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia,
to ‘‘issue such regulations as may be
necessary to assure that the taking of
migratory birds and the collection of
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
their eggs, by the indigenous inhabitants
of the State of Alaska, shall be permitted
for their own nutritional and other
essential needs, as determined by the
Secretary of the Interior, during seasons
established so as to provide for the
preservation and maintenance of stocks
of migratory birds.’’
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant
rules. The OIRA has determined that
this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of E.O. 12866 while calling
for improvements in the nation’s
regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
further that regulations must be based
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that, if adopted, this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
as defined under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). A
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. Accordingly, a Small Entity
Compliance Guide is not required. This
proposed rule would legalize a preexisting subsistence activity, and the
resources harvested will be consumed.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
(a) Would not have an annual effect
on the economy of $100 million or
more. It would legalize and regulate a
traditional subsistence activity. It would
not result in a substantial increase in
subsistence harvest or a significant
change in harvesting patterns. The
commodities that would be regulated
E:\FR\FM\05SEP2.SGM
05SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 172 / Friday, September 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
under this proposed rule are migratory
birds. This rule deals with legalizing the
subsistence harvest of migratory birds
and, as such, does not involve
commodities traded in the marketplace.
A small economic benefit from this
proposed rule would derive from the
sale of equipment and ammunition to
carry out subsistence hunting. Most, if
not all, businesses that sell hunting
equipment in rural Alaska qualify as
small businesses. We have no reason to
believe that this proposed rule would
lead to a disproportionate distribution
of benefits.
(b) Would not cause a major increase
in costs or prices for consumers;
individual industries; Federal, State, or
local government agencies; or
geographic regions. This proposed rule
does not deal with traded commodities
and, therefore, does not have an impact
on prices for consumers.
(c) Would not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This proposed rule deals with the
harvesting of wildlife for personal
consumption. It does not regulate the
marketplace in any way to generate
effects on the economy or the ability of
businesses to compete.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We have determined and certified
under the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) that this
proposed rule would not impose a cost
of $100 million or more in any given
year on local, State, or tribal
governments or private entities. The
proposed rule does not have a
significant or unique effect on State,
local, or tribal governments or the
private sector. A statement containing
the information required by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act is not
required. Participation on regional
management bodies and the Comanagement Council requires travel
expenses for some Alaska Native
organizations and local governments. In
addition, they assume some expenses
related to coordinating involvement of
village councils in the regulatory
process. Total coordination and travel
expenses for all Alaska Native
organizations are estimated to be less
than $300,000 per year. In a notice of
decision (65 FR 16405; March 28, 2000),
we identified 7 to 12 partner
organizations (Alaska Native nonprofits
and local governments) to administer
the regional programs. The Alaska
Department of Fish and Game also
incurs expenses for travel to Comanagement Council and regional
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:30 Sep 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
management body meetings. In
addition, the State of Alaska will be
required to provide technical staff
support to each of the regional
management bodies and to the Comanagement Council. Expenses for the
State’s involvement may exceed
$100,000 per year, but should not
exceed $150,000 per year. When
funding permits, we make annual grant
agreements available to the partner
organizations and the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game to help
offset their expenses.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
12630, this proposed rule would not
have significant takings implications.
This proposed rule is not specific to
particular land ownership, but applies
to the harvesting of migratory bird
resources throughout Alaska. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
13132, this proposed rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. We discuss
effects of this proposed rule on the State
of Alaska in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act section above. We worked
with the State of Alaska to develop
these proposed regulations. Therefore, a
federalism summary impact statement is
not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
The Department, in promulgating this
proposed rule, has determined that it
will not unduly burden the judicial
system and that it meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988.
Government-to-Government Relations
With Native American Tribal
Governments
Consistent with Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249; November 6, 2000),
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’, and
Department of Interior policy on
Consultation with Indian Tribes
(December 1, 2011), we will send letters
to all 229 Alaska Federally recognized
Indian tribes. Consistent with
Congressional direction (Pub. L. 108–
199, div. H, Sec. 161, Jan. 23, 2004, 118
Stat. 452, as amended by Pub. L. 108–
447, div. H, title V, Sec. 518, Dec. 8,
2004, 118 Stat. 3267), we will be
sending letters to approximately 200
Alaska Native corporations and other
tribal entities in Alaska soliciting their
input as to whether or not they would
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
53123
like the Service to consult with them on
the 2015 migratory bird subsistence
harvest regulations.
We implemented the amended treaty
with Canada with a focus on local
involvement. The treaty calls for the
creation of management bodies to
ensure an effective and meaningful role
for Alaska’s indigenous inhabitants in
the conservation of migratory birds.
According to the Letter of Submittal,
management bodies are to include
Alaska Native, Federal, and State of
Alaska representatives as equals. They
develop recommendations for, among
other things: Seasons and bag limits,
methods and means of take, law
enforcement policies, population and
harvest monitoring, education programs,
research and use of traditional
knowledge, and habitat protection. The
management bodies involve village
councils to the maximum extent
possible in all aspects of management.
To ensure maximum input at the village
level, we required each of the 11
participating regions to create regional
management bodies consisting of at
least one representative from the
participating villages. The regional
management bodies meet twice
annually to review and/or submit
proposals to the Statewide body.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule has been
examined under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) and does not contain any new
collections of information that require
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approval. OMB has renewed our
collection of information associated
with the voluntary annual household
surveys used to determine levels of
subsistence take. The OMB control
number is 1018–0124, which expires
June 30, 2016. We may not conduct or
sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) Consideration
The annual regulations and options
are considered in a September 2014
environmental assessment, ‘‘Managing
Migratory Bird Subsistence Hunting in
Alaska: Hunting Regulations for the
2015 Spring/Summer Harvest.’’ Copies
are available from the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT or at https://
www.regulations.gov.
E:\FR\FM\05SEP2.SGM
05SEP2
53124
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 172 / Friday, September 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
(Executive Order 13211)
Executive Order 13211 requires
agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain
actions. This is not a significant
regulatory action under this Executive
Order; it would allow only for
traditional subsistence harvest and
improve conservation of migratory birds
by allowing effective regulation of this
harvest. Further, this proposed rule is
not expected to significantly affect
energy supplies, distribution, or use.
Therefore, this action is not a significant
energy action under Executive Order
13211, and a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 92
Hunting, Treaties, Wildlife.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, we propose to amend title 50,
chapter I, subchapter G, of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 92—MIGRATORY BIRD
SUBSISTENCE HARVEST IN ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 92
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703–712.
Subpart D—Annual Regulations
Governing Subsistence Harvest
2. Amend subpart D by adding § 92.31
to read as follows:
■
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 92.31
Region-specific regulations.
The 2015 season dates for the eligible
subsistence harvest areas are as follows:
(a) Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Region.
(1) Northern Unit (Pribilof Islands):
(i) Season: April 2–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
(2) Central Unit (Aleutian Region’s
eastern boundary on the Alaska
Peninsula westward to and including
Unalaska Island):
(i) Season: April 2–June 15 and July
16–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 16–July 15.
(iii) Special Black Brant Season
Closure: August 16–August 31, only in
Izembek and Moffet lagoons.
(iv) Special Tundra Swan Closure: All
hunting and egg gathering closed in
Game Management Units 9(D) and 10.
(3) Western Unit (Umnak Island west
to and including Attu Island):
(i) Season: April 2–July 15 and August
16–August 31.
(ii) Closure: July 16–August 15.
(b) Yukon/Kuskokwim Delta Region.
(1) Season: April 2–August 31.
(2) Closure: 30-day closure dates to be
announced by the Service’s Alaska
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:30 Sep 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
Regional Director or his designee, after
consultation with field biologists and
the Association of Village Council
President’s Waterfowl Conservation
Committee. This 30-day period will
occur between June 1 and August 15 of
each year. A press release announcing
the actual closure dates will be
forwarded to regional newspapers and
radio and television stations.
(3) Special Black Brant and Cackling
Goose Season Hunting Closure: From
the period when egg laying begins until
young birds are fledged. Closure dates to
be announced by the Service’s Alaska
Regional Director or his designee, after
consultation with field biologists and
the Association of Village Council
President’s Waterfowl Conservation
Committee. A press release announcing
the actual closure dates will be
forwarded to regional newspapers and
radio and television stations.
(c) Bristol Bay Region.
(1) Season: April 2–June 14 and July
16–August 31 (general season); April 2–
July 15 for seabird egg gathering only.
(2) Closure: June 15–July 15 (general
season); July 16–August 31 (seabird egg
gathering).
(d) Bering Strait/Norton Sound
Region.
(1) Stebbins/St. Michael Area (Point
Romanof to Canal Point):
(i) Season: April 15–June 14 and July
16–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 15–July 15.
(2) Remainder of the region:
(i) Season: April 2–June 14 and July
16–August 31 for waterfowl; April 2–
July 19 and August 21–August 31 for all
other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 15–July 15 for
waterfowl; July 20–August 20 for all
other birds.
(e) Kodiak Archipelago Region, except
for the Kodiak Island roaded area,
which is closed to the harvesting of
migratory birds and their eggs. The
closed area consists of all lands and
waters (including exposed tidelands)
east of a line extending from Crag Point
in the north to the west end of Saltery
Cove in the south and all lands and
water south of a line extending from
Termination Point along the north side
of Cascade Lake extending to Anton
Larsen Bay. Marine waters adjacent to
the closed area are closed to harvest
within 500 feet from the water’s edge.
The offshore islands are open to harvest.
(1) Season: April 2–June 30 and July
31–August 31 for seabirds; April 2–June
20 and July 22–August 31 for all other
birds.
(2) Closure: July 1–July 30 for
seabirds; June 21–July 21 for all other
birds.
(f) Northwest Arctic Region.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(1) Season: April 2–June 9 and August
15–August 31 (hunting in general);
waterfowl egg gathering May 20–June 9
only; seabird egg gathering May 20–July
12 only; hunting molting/non-nesting
waterfowl July 1–July 31 only.
(2) Closure: June 10–August 14,
except for the taking of seabird eggs and
molting/non-nesting waterfowl as
provided in paragraph (f)(1) of this
section.
(g) North Slope Region.
(1) Southern Unit (Southwestern
North Slope regional boundary east to
Peard Bay, everything west of the
longitude line 158°30′ W and south of
the latitude line 70°45′ N to the west
bank of the Ikpikpuk River, and
everything south of the latitude line
69°45′ N between the west bank of the
Ikpikpuk River to the east bank of
Sagavinirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2–June 29 and July
30–August 31 for seabirds; April 2–June
19 and July 20–August 31 for all other
birds.
(ii) Closure: June 30–July 29 for
seabirds; June 20–July 19 for all other
birds.
(iii) Special Black Brant Hunting
Opening: From June 20–July 5. The
open area consists of the coastline, from
mean high water line outward to
include open water, from Nokotlek
Point east to longitude line 158°30′ W.
This includes Peard Bay, Kugrua Bay,
and Wainwright Inlet, but not the Kuk
and Kugrua river drainages.
(2) Northern Unit (At Peard Bay,
everything east of the longitude line
158°30′ W and north of the latitude line
70°45′ N to west bank of the Ikpikpuk
River, and everything north of the
latitude line 69°45′ N between the west
bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the east
bank of Sagavinirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2–June 6 and July 7–
August 31 for king and common eiders;
April 2–June 15 and July 16–August 31
for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 7–July 6 for king and
common eiders; June 16–July 15 for all
other birds.
(3) Eastern Unit (East of eastern bank
of the Sagavanirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2–June 19 and July
20–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 20–July 19.
(4) All Units: Yellow-billed loons.
Annually, up to 20 yellow-billed loons
total for the region inadvertently
entangled in subsistence fishing nets in
the North Slope Region may be kept for
subsistence use.
(5) North Coastal Zone (Cape
Thompson north to Point Hope and east
along the Arctic Ocean coastline around
Point Barrow to Ross Point, including
Iko Bay, and 5 miles inland).
E:\FR\FM\05SEP2.SGM
05SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 172 / Friday, September 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
(i) No person may at any time, by any
means, or in any manner, possess or
have in custody any migratory bird or
part thereof, taken in violation of
subpart C and D of this part.
(ii) Upon request from a Service law
enforcement officer, hunters taking,
attempting to take, or transporting
migratory birds taken during the
subsistence harvest season must present
them to the officer for species
identification.
(h) Interior Region.
(1) Season: April 2–June 14 and July
16–August 31; egg gathering May 1–June
14 only.
(2) Closure: June 15–July 15.
(i) Upper Copper River Region
(Harvest Area: Game Management Units
11 and 13) (Eligible communities:
Gulkana, Chitina, Tazlina, Copper
Center, Gakona, Mentasta Lake,
Chistochina and Cantwell).
(1) Season: April 15–May 26 and June
27–August 31.
(2) Closure: May 27–June 26.
(3) The Copper River Basin
communities listed above also
documented traditional use harvesting
birds in Game Management Unit 12,
making them eligible to hunt in this unit
using the seasons specified in paragraph
(h) of this section.
(j) Gulf of Alaska Region.
(1) Prince William Sound Area West
(Harvest area: Game Management Unit
6[D]), (Eligible Chugach communities:
Chenega Bay, Tatitlek):
(i) Season: April 2–May 31 and July
1–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1–30.
(2) Prince William Sound Area East
(Harvest area: Game Management Units
6[B] and [C]–Barrier Islands between
Strawberry Channel and Softtuk Bar),
(Eligible Chugach communities:
Cordova):
(i) Season: April 2–April 30 (hunting);
May 1–May 31 (gull egg gathering).
(ii) Closure: May 1–August 31
(hunting); April 2–30 and June 1–
August 31 (gull egg gathering).
(iii) Species Open for Hunting:
Greater white-fronted goose; snow
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:30 Sep 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
goose; gadwall; Eurasian and American
wigeon; blue-winged and green-winged
teal; mallard; northern shoveler;
northern pintail; canvasback; redhead;
ring-necked duck; greater and lesser
scaup; king and common eider;
harlequin duck; surf, white-winged, and
black scoter; long-tailed duck;
bufflehead; common and Barrow’s
goldeneye; hooded, common, and redbreasted merganser; and sandhill crane.
Species open for egg gathering:
Glaucous-winged, herring, and mew
gulls.
(iv) Use of Boats/All-Terrain Vehicles:
No hunting from motorized vehicles or
any form of watercraft.
(v) Special Registration: All hunters or
egg gatherers must possess an annual
permit, which is available from the
Cordova offices of the Native Village of
Eyak and the U.S. Forest Service.
(3) Kachemak Bay Area (Harvest area:
Game Management Unit 15[C] South of
a line connecting the tip of Homer Spit
to the mouth of Fox River) (Eligible
Chugach Communities: Port Graham,
Nanwalek):
(i) Season: April 2–May 31 and July
1–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1–30.
(k) Cook Inlet (Harvest area: Portions
of Game Management Unit 16[B] as
specified below) (Eligible communities:
Tyonek only):
(1) Season: April 2–May 31—That
portion of Game Management Unit 16(B)
south of the Skwentna River and west
of the Yentna River, and August 1–31—
That portion of Game Management Unit
16(B) south of the Beluga River, Beluga
Lake, and the Triumvirate Glacier.
(2) Closure: June 1–July 31.
(l) Southeast Alaska.
(1) Community of Hoonah (Harvest
area: National Forest lands in Icy Strait
and Cross Sound, including Middle Pass
Rock near the Inian Islands, Table Rock
in Cross Sound, and other traditional
locations on the coast of Yakobi Island.
The land and waters of Glacier Bay
National Park remain closed to all
subsistence harvesting (50 CFR part
100.3(a)):
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
53125
(i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg
gathering only: May 15–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
(2) Communities of Craig and
Hydaburg (Harvest area: Small islands
and adjacent shoreline of western Prince
of Wales Island from Point Baker to
Cape Chacon, but also including
Coronation and Warren islands):
(i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg
gathering only: May 15–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
(3) Community of Yakutat (Harvest
area: Icy Bay (Icy Cape to Point Riou),
and coastal lands and islands bordering
the Gulf of Alaska from Point Manby
southeast to and including Dry Bay):
(i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg
gathering: May 15–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
■ 3. Amend subpart D by adding § 92.32
to read as follows:
§ 92.32 Emergency regulations to protect
Steller’s eiders.
Upon finding that continuation of
these subsistence regulations would
pose an imminent threat to the
conservation of threatened Steller’s
eiders (Polysticta stelleri), the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service Alaska Regional
Director, in consultation with the Comanagement Council, will immediately
under § 92.21 take action as is necessary
to prevent further take. Regulation
changes implemented could range from
a temporary closure of duck hunting in
a small geographic area to large-scale
regional or Statewide long-term closures
of all subsistence migratory bird
hunting. These closures or temporary
suspensions will remain in effect until
the Regional Director, in consultation
with the Co-management Council,
determines that the potential for
additional Steller’s eiders to be taken no
longer exists.
Dated: August 25, 2014.
Michael J. Bean,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish
and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2014–21195 Filed 9–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\05SEP2.SGM
05SEP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53119-53125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21195]
[[Page 53119]]
Vol. 79
Friday,
No. 172
September 5, 2014
Part II
Department of the Interior
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 92
Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in Alaska; Harvest Regulations for
Migratory Birds in Alaska During the 2015 Season; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 79 , No. 172 / Friday, September 5, 2014 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 53120]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 92
[Docket No. FWS-R7-MB-2014-0036; FF09M21200-145-FXMB1231099BPP0]
RIN 1018-BA48
Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in Alaska; Harvest Regulations
for Migratory Birds in Alaska During the 2015 Season
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or we) is
proposing migratory bird subsistence harvest regulations in Alaska for
the 2015 season. These regulations allow for the continuation of
customary and traditional subsistence uses of migratory birds in Alaska
and prescribe regional information on when and where the harvesting of
birds may occur. These regulations were developed under a co-management
process involving the Service, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game,
and Alaska Native representatives. The rulemaking is necessary because
the regulations governing the subsistence harvest of migratory birds in
Alaska are subject to annual review. This rulemaking proposes region-
specific regulations that would go into effect on April 2, 2015, and
expire on August 31, 2015.
DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before
November 4, 2014. We must receive requests for public hearings, in
writing, at the address shown in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by
October 20, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments to Docket No. FWS-R7-
MB-2014-0036.
U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public Comments Processing,
Attn: FWS-R7-MB-2014-0036; Division of Policy and Directives
Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 5275 Leesburg Place, MS:
BPHC; Falls Church, VA 22041-3803.
We will not accept email or faxes. We will post all comments on https://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us (see the Public Comment Procedures
section, below, for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Dewhurst, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 1011 E. Tudor Road, Mail Stop 201, Anchorage, AK 99503; (907)
786-3499.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comment Procedures
To ensure that any action resulting from this proposed rule will be
as accurate and as effective as possible, we request that you send
relevant information for our consideration. The comments that will be
most useful and likely to influence our decisions are those that you
support by quantitative information or studies and those that include
citations to, and analyses of, the applicable laws and regulations.
Please make your comments as specific as possible and explain the basis
for them. In addition, please include sufficient information with your
comments to allow us to authenticate any scientific or commercial data
you include.
You must submit your comments and materials concerning this
proposed rule by one of the methods listed above in the ADDRESSES
section. We will not accept comments sent by email or fax or to an
address not listed in ADDRESSES. If you submit a comment via https://www.regulations.gov, your entire comment--including any personal
identifying information, such as your address, telephone number, or
email address--will be posted on the Web site. When you submit a
comment, the system receives it immediately. However, the comment will
not be publicly viewable until we post it, which might not occur until
several days after submission.
If you mail or hand-carry a hardcopy comment directly to us that
includes personal information, you may request at the top of your
document that we withhold this information from public review. However,
we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. To ensure that the
electronic docket for this rulemaking is complete and all comments we
receive are publicly available, we will post all hardcopy comments on
https://www.regulations.gov.
In addition, comments and materials we receive, as well as
supporting documentation used in preparing this proposed rule, will be
available for public inspection in two ways:
(1) You can view them on https://www.regulations.gov. Search for
FWS-R7-MB-2014-0036, which is the docket number for this rulemaking.
(2) You can make an appointment, during normal business hours, to
view the comments and materials in person at the Division of Migratory
Bird Management, MS: MB, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-
3803.
Public Availability of Comments
As stated above in more detail, before including your address,
phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information
in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--
including your personal identifying information--may be made publicly
available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold
your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Why is this rulemaking necessary?
This rulemaking is necessary because, by law, the migratory bird
harvest season is closed unless opened by the Secretary of the
Interior, and the regulations governing subsistence harvest of
migratory birds in Alaska are subject to public review and annual
approval. This rule proposes regulations for the taking of migratory
birds for subsistence uses in Alaska during the spring and summer of
2015. This rule also sets forth a list of migratory bird season
openings and closures in Alaska by region.
How do I find the history of these regulations?
Background information, including past events leading to this
rulemaking, accomplishments since the Migratory Bird Treaties with
Canada and Mexico were amended, and a history, were originally
addressed in the Federal Register on August 16, 2002 (67 FR 53511) and
most recently on April 8, 2014 (79 FR 19454).
Recent Federal Register documents, all final rules setting forth
the annual harvest regulations, are available at https://www.fws.gov/alaska/ambcc/regulations.htm or by contacting the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
What is the process for issuing regulations for the subsistence harvest
of migratory birds in Alaska?
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or we) is proposing
migratory bird subsistence harvest regulations in Alaska for the 2015
season. These regulations allow for the continuation of customary and
traditional subsistence uses of migratory birds in Alaska and prescribe
regional information on when and where the harvesting of birds may
occur. These regulations were developed under a co-management process
involving the Service, the
[[Page 53121]]
Alaska Department of Fish and Game, and Alaska Native representatives.
We opened the process to establish regulations for the 2015 spring
and summer subsistence harvest of migratory birds in Alaska in a
proposed rule published in the Federal Register on April 30, 2014 (79
FR 24512), to amend 50 CFR part 20. While that proposed rule primarily
addressed the regulatory process for hunting migratory birds for all
purposes throughout the United States, we also discussed the background
and history of Alaska subsistence regulations, explained the annual
process for their establishment, and requested proposals for the 2015
season. The rulemaking processes for both types of migratory bird
harvest are related, and the April 30, 2014, proposed rule explained
the connection between the two.
The Alaska Migratory Bird Co-management Council (Co-management
Council) held meetings on April 10-11, 2014, to develop recommendations
for changes that would take effect during the 2015 harvest season. No
changes were recommended, and this was presented first to the Pacific
Flyway Council and then to the Service Regulations Committee (SRC) for
approval at the committee's meeting on July 30, 2014.
Who is eligible to hunt under these regulations?
Eligibility to harvest under the regulations established in 2003
was limited to permanent residents, regardless of race, in villages
located within the Alaska Peninsula, Kodiak Archipelago, the Aleutian
Islands, and in areas north and west of the Alaska Range (50 CFR 92.5).
These geographical restrictions opened the initial migratory bird
subsistence harvest to about 13 percent of Alaska residents. High-
populated, roaded areas such as Anchorage, the Matanuska-Susitna and
Fairbanks North Star boroughs, the Kenai Peninsula roaded area, the
Gulf of Alaska roaded area, and Southeast Alaska were excluded from
eligible subsistence harvest areas.
Based on petitions requesting inclusion in the harvest in 2004, we
added 13 additional communities based on criteria set forth in 50 CFR
92.5(c). These communities were Gulkana, Gakona, Tazlina, Copper
Center, Mentasta Lake, Chitina, Chistochina, Tatitlek, Chenega, Port
Graham, Nanwalek, Tyonek, and Hoonah, with a combined population of
2,766. In 2005, we added three additional communities for glaucous-
winged gull egg gathering only, based on petitions requesting
inclusion. These southeastern communities were Craig, Hydaburg, and
Yakutat, with a combined population of 2,459, based on the latest
census information at that time.
In 2007, we enacted the Alaska Department of Fish and Game's
request to expand the Fairbanks North Star Borough excluded area to
include the Central Interior area. This action excluded the following
communities from participation in this harvest: Big Delta/Fort Greely,
Healy, McKinley Park/Village, and Ferry, with a combined population of
2,812.
In 2012, we received a request from the Native Village of Eyak to
include Cordova, Alaska, for a limited season that would legalize the
traditional gathering of gull eggs and the hunting of waterfowl during
spring. This request resulted in a new, limited harvest of spring
waterfowl and gull eggs starting in 2014.
What is different in the region-specific regulations for 2015?
There are no changes from the 2014 regulations.
How will the service ensure that the subsistence harvest will not raise
overall migratory bird harvest or threaten the conservation of
endangered and threatened species?
We have monitored subsistence harvest for the past 25 years through
the use of household surveys in the most heavily used subsistence
harvest areas, such as the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta. In recent years, more
intensive surveys combined with outreach efforts focused on species
identification have been added to improve the accuracy of information
gathered from regions still reporting some subsistence harvest of
listed or candidate species.
Spectacled and Steller's Eiders
Spectacled eiders (Somateria fischeri) and the Alaska-breeding
population of Steller's eiders (Polysticta stelleri) are listed as
threatened species. Their migration and breeding distribution overlap
with areas where the spring and summer subsistence migratory bird hunt
is open in Alaska. Both species are closed to hunting, although harvest
surveys and Service documentation indicate both species have been taken
in several regions of Alaska.
The Service has dual objectives and responsibilities for
authorizing a subsistence harvest while protecting migratory birds and
threatened species. Although these objectives continue to be
challenging, they are not irreconcilable, provided that regulations
continue to protect threatened species, measures to address documented
threats are implemented, and the subsistence community and other
conservation partners commit to working together. With these dual
objectives in mind, the Service, working with North Slope partners,
developed measures in 2009, to further reduce the potential for
shooting mortality or injury of closed species. These conservation
measures included: (1) Increased waterfowl hunter outreach and
community awareness through partnering with the North Slope Migratory
Bird Task Force; and (2) continued enforcement of the migratory bird
regulations that are protective of listed eiders.
This proposed rule continues to focus on the North Slope from
Barrow to Point Hope because Steller's eiders from the listed Alaska
breeding population are known to breed and migrate there. These
regulations are designed to address several ongoing eider management
needs by clarifying for subsistence users that (1) Service law
enforcement personnel have authority to verify species of birds
possessed by hunters, and (2) it is illegal to possess any species of
bird closed to harvest. This rule also describes how the Service's
existing authority of emergency closure will be implemented, if
necessary, to protect Steller's eiders. We are always willing to
discuss regulations with our partners on the North Slope to ensure
protection of closed species as well as provide subsistence hunters an
opportunity to harvest migratory birds in a way that maintains the
culture and traditional harvest of the community. The regulations
pertaining to bag checks and possession of illegal birds are deemed
necessary to verify that no closed eider species are taken during the
legal subsistence hunt.
The Service is aware of and appreciates the considerable efforts by
North Slope partners to raise awareness and educate hunters on
Steller's eider conservation via the bird fair, meetings, radio shows,
signs, school visits, and one-on-one contacts. We also recognize that
no listed eiders have been documented shot from 2009 through 2012, even
though Steller's eiders nested in the Barrow area during that time. One
Steller's eider and one spectacled eider were found shot during the
summer of 2013; both incidents were investigated by the Service. No
listed eiders were found or reported shot in 2014. The Service
acknowledges progress made with the other eider conservation measures
including partnering with the North Slope Migratory Bird Task Force for
increased waterfowl hunter awareness, continued enforcement of the
regulations, and in-
[[Page 53122]]
season verification of the harvest. To reduce the threat of shooting
mortality of threatened eiders, we continue to work with North Slope
partners to conduct education and outreach. In addition, the emergency
closure authority provides another level of assurance if an unexpected
number of Steller's eiders are killed by shooting (50 CFR 92.21 and 50
CFR 92.32).
In-season harvest monitoring information will be used to evaluate
the efficacy of regulations, conservation measures, and outreach
efforts. Conservation measures are being continued by the Service, with
the amount of effort and emphasis being based on regulatory adherence.
Specifically, local communities have continued to develop greater
responsibility for taking actions to ensure Steller's and spectacled
eider conservation and recovery.
The longstanding general emergency closure provision at 50 CFR
92.21 specifies that the harvest may be closed or temporarily suspended
upon finding that a continuation of the regulation allowing the harvest
would pose an imminent threat to the conservation of any migratory bird
population. With regard to Steller's eiders, the regulation at 50 CFR
92.32, carried over from the past 5 years, clarifies that we will take
action under 50 CFR 92.21 as is necessary to prevent further take of
Steller's eiders, and that action could include temporary or long-term
closures of the harvest in all or a portion of the geographic area open
to harvest. If mortality of threatened eiders occurs, we will evaluate
each mortality event by criteria such as cause, quantity, sex, age,
location, and date. We will consult with the Co-management Council when
we are considering an emergency closure. If we determine that an
emergency closure is necessary, we will design it to minimize its
impact on the subsistence harvest.
Yellow-Billed Loon
Yellow-billed loons (Gavia adamsii) are a candidate species for
listing under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.). Their migration and breeding distribution overlaps the
spring and summer migratory bird hunt in Alaska. Yellow-billed loons
are closed to hunting, but harvest surveys have indicated that on the
North Slope and St. Lawrence Island some take does occur. Most of the
yellow-billed loons taken on the North Slope were found to be entangled
loons salvaged from subsistence fishing nets as described below. The
Service will continue outreach efforts in both areas in 2015, engaging
partners to decrease the take of yellow-billed loons.
Consistent with the request of the North Slope Borough Fish and
Game Management Committee and the recommendation of the Co-management
Council, this rule continues the provisions originally established in
2005, to allow subsistence use of yellow-billed loons inadvertently
entangled in subsistence fishing (gill) nets on the North Slope.
Yellow-billed loons are culturally important to the Inupiat Eskimo of
the North Slope for use in traditional dance regalia. A maximum of 20
yellow-billed loons will be allowed to be kept if found entangled in
fishing nets in 2015, under this provision. This provision does not
authorize intentional harvest of yellow-billed loons, but allows use of
those loons inadvertently entangled during normal subsistence fishing
activities.
Endangered Species Act Consideration
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1536) requires
the Secretary of the Interior to ``review other programs administered
by her and utilize such programs in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act'' and to ``insure that any action authorized, funded, or carried
out . . . is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
endangered species or threatened species or result in the destruction
or adverse modification of [critical] habitat. . . .'' Prior to
issuance of annual spring and summer subsistence regulations, we would
consult under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act), to ensure that the 2015 subsistence harvest is not
likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any species designated
as endangered or threatened, or modify or destroy its critical
habitats, and that the regulations are consistent with conservation
programs for those species. Consultation under section 7 of the Act for
the annual subsistence take regulations may cause us to change these
regulations. Our biological opinion resulting from the section 7
consultation is a public document that will be available from the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Statutory Authority
We derive our authority to issue these regulations from the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, at 16 U.S.C. 712(1), which
authorizes the Secretary of the Interior, in accordance with the
treaties with Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia, to ``issue such
regulations as may be necessary to assure that the taking of migratory
birds and the collection of their eggs, by the indigenous inhabitants
of the State of Alaska, shall be permitted for their own nutritional
and other essential needs, as determined by the Secretary of the
Interior, during seasons established so as to provide for the
preservation and maintenance of stocks of migratory birds.''
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will review all significant rules. The OIRA
has determined that this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while
calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches
that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for
the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and
consistent with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further
that regulations must be based on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent
with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that, if adopted, this
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). A regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. Accordingly, a Small Entity Compliance Guide is not required.
This proposed rule would legalize a pre-existing subsistence activity,
and the resources harvested will be consumed.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
(a) Would not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more. It would legalize and regulate a traditional subsistence
activity. It would not result in a substantial increase in subsistence
harvest or a significant change in harvesting patterns. The commodities
that would be regulated
[[Page 53123]]
under this proposed rule are migratory birds. This rule deals with
legalizing the subsistence harvest of migratory birds and, as such,
does not involve commodities traded in the marketplace. A small
economic benefit from this proposed rule would derive from the sale of
equipment and ammunition to carry out subsistence hunting. Most, if not
all, businesses that sell hunting equipment in rural Alaska qualify as
small businesses. We have no reason to believe that this proposed rule
would lead to a disproportionate distribution of benefits.
(b) Would not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, or local government
agencies; or geographic regions. This proposed rule does not deal with
traded commodities and, therefore, does not have an impact on prices
for consumers.
(c) Would not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This
proposed rule deals with the harvesting of wildlife for personal
consumption. It does not regulate the marketplace in any way to
generate effects on the economy or the ability of businesses to
compete.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We have determined and certified under the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) that this proposed rule would not impose a
cost of $100 million or more in any given year on local, State, or
tribal governments or private entities. The proposed rule does not have
a significant or unique effect on State, local, or tribal governments
or the private sector. A statement containing the information required
by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act is not required. Participation on
regional management bodies and the Co-management Council requires
travel expenses for some Alaska Native organizations and local
governments. In addition, they assume some expenses related to
coordinating involvement of village councils in the regulatory process.
Total coordination and travel expenses for all Alaska Native
organizations are estimated to be less than $300,000 per year. In a
notice of decision (65 FR 16405; March 28, 2000), we identified 7 to 12
partner organizations (Alaska Native nonprofits and local governments)
to administer the regional programs. The Alaska Department of Fish and
Game also incurs expenses for travel to Co-management Council and
regional management body meetings. In addition, the State of Alaska
will be required to provide technical staff support to each of the
regional management bodies and to the Co-management Council. Expenses
for the State's involvement may exceed $100,000 per year, but should
not exceed $150,000 per year. When funding permits, we make annual
grant agreements available to the partner organizations and the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game to help offset their expenses.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 12630, this proposed rule
would not have significant takings implications. This proposed rule is
not specific to particular land ownership, but applies to the
harvesting of migratory bird resources throughout Alaska. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 13132, this proposed rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. We discuss
effects of this proposed rule on the State of Alaska in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act section above. We worked with the State of Alaska
to develop these proposed regulations. Therefore, a federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
The Department, in promulgating this proposed rule, has determined
that it will not unduly burden the judicial system and that it meets
the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Government-to-Government Relations With Native American Tribal
Governments
Consistent with Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249; November 6,
2000), ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments'', and Department of Interior policy on Consultation with
Indian Tribes (December 1, 2011), we will send letters to all 229
Alaska Federally recognized Indian tribes. Consistent with
Congressional direction (Pub. L. 108-199, div. H, Sec. 161, Jan. 23,
2004, 118 Stat. 452, as amended by Pub. L. 108-447, div. H, title V,
Sec. 518, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3267), we will be sending letters to
approximately 200 Alaska Native corporations and other tribal entities
in Alaska soliciting their input as to whether or not they would like
the Service to consult with them on the 2015 migratory bird subsistence
harvest regulations.
We implemented the amended treaty with Canada with a focus on local
involvement. The treaty calls for the creation of management bodies to
ensure an effective and meaningful role for Alaska's indigenous
inhabitants in the conservation of migratory birds. According to the
Letter of Submittal, management bodies are to include Alaska Native,
Federal, and State of Alaska representatives as equals. They develop
recommendations for, among other things: Seasons and bag limits,
methods and means of take, law enforcement policies, population and
harvest monitoring, education programs, research and use of traditional
knowledge, and habitat protection. The management bodies involve
village councils to the maximum extent possible in all aspects of
management. To ensure maximum input at the village level, we required
each of the 11 participating regions to create regional management
bodies consisting of at least one representative from the participating
villages. The regional management bodies meet twice annually to review
and/or submit proposals to the Statewide body.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule has been examined under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and does not contain any new
collections of information that require Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approval. OMB has renewed our collection of information
associated with the voluntary annual household surveys used to
determine levels of subsistence take. The OMB control number is 1018-
0124, which expires June 30, 2016. We may not conduct or sponsor and
you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless
it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
Consideration
The annual regulations and options are considered in a September
2014 environmental assessment, ``Managing Migratory Bird Subsistence
Hunting in Alaska: Hunting Regulations for the 2015 Spring/Summer
Harvest.'' Copies are available from the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or at https://www.regulations.gov.
[[Page 53124]]
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (Executive Order 13211)
Executive Order 13211 requires agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. This is not a
significant regulatory action under this Executive Order; it would
allow only for traditional subsistence harvest and improve conservation
of migratory birds by allowing effective regulation of this harvest.
Further, this proposed rule is not expected to significantly affect
energy supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore, this action is not a
significant energy action under Executive Order 13211, and a Statement
of Energy Effects is not required.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 92
Hunting, Treaties, Wildlife.
Proposed Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons set out in the preamble, we propose to amend title
50, chapter I, subchapter G, of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 92--MIGRATORY BIRD SUBSISTENCE HARVEST IN ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for part 92 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703-712.
Subpart D--Annual Regulations Governing Subsistence Harvest
0
2. Amend subpart D by adding Sec. 92.31 to read as follows:
Sec. 92.31 Region-specific regulations.
The 2015 season dates for the eligible subsistence harvest areas
are as follows:
(a) Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Region.
(1) Northern Unit (Pribilof Islands):
(i) Season: April 2-June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
(2) Central Unit (Aleutian Region's eastern boundary on the Alaska
Peninsula westward to and including Unalaska Island):
(i) Season: April 2-June 15 and July 16-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 16-July 15.
(iii) Special Black Brant Season Closure: August 16-August 31, only
in Izembek and Moffet lagoons.
(iv) Special Tundra Swan Closure: All hunting and egg gathering
closed in Game Management Units 9(D) and 10.
(3) Western Unit (Umnak Island west to and including Attu Island):
(i) Season: April 2-July 15 and August 16-August 31.
(ii) Closure: July 16-August 15.
(b) Yukon/Kuskokwim Delta Region.
(1) Season: April 2-August 31.
(2) Closure: 30-day closure dates to be announced by the Service's
Alaska Regional Director or his designee, after consultation with field
biologists and the Association of Village Council President's Waterfowl
Conservation Committee. This 30-day period will occur between June 1
and August 15 of each year. A press release announcing the actual
closure dates will be forwarded to regional newspapers and radio and
television stations.
(3) Special Black Brant and Cackling Goose Season Hunting Closure:
From the period when egg laying begins until young birds are fledged.
Closure dates to be announced by the Service's Alaska Regional Director
or his designee, after consultation with field biologists and the
Association of Village Council President's Waterfowl Conservation
Committee. A press release announcing the actual closure dates will be
forwarded to regional newspapers and radio and television stations.
(c) Bristol Bay Region.
(1) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31 (general season);
April 2-July 15 for seabird egg gathering only.
(2) Closure: June 15-July 15 (general season); July 16-August 31
(seabird egg gathering).
(d) Bering Strait/Norton Sound Region.
(1) Stebbins/St. Michael Area (Point Romanof to Canal Point):
(i) Season: April 15-June 14 and July 16-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 15-July 15.
(2) Remainder of the region:
(i) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31 for waterfowl;
April 2-July 19 and August 21-August 31 for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 15-July 15 for waterfowl; July 20-August 20 for
all other birds.
(e) Kodiak Archipelago Region, except for the Kodiak Island roaded
area, which is closed to the harvesting of migratory birds and their
eggs. The closed area consists of all lands and waters (including
exposed tidelands) east of a line extending from Crag Point in the
north to the west end of Saltery Cove in the south and all lands and
water south of a line extending from Termination Point along the north
side of Cascade Lake extending to Anton Larsen Bay. Marine waters
adjacent to the closed area are closed to harvest within 500 feet from
the water's edge. The offshore islands are open to harvest.
(1) Season: April 2-June 30 and July 31-August 31 for seabirds;
April 2-June 20 and July 22-August 31 for all other birds.
(2) Closure: July 1-July 30 for seabirds; June 21-July 21 for all
other birds.
(f) Northwest Arctic Region.
(1) Season: April 2-June 9 and August 15-August 31 (hunting in
general); waterfowl egg gathering May 20-June 9 only; seabird egg
gathering May 20-July 12 only; hunting molting/non-nesting waterfowl
July 1-July 31 only.
(2) Closure: June 10-August 14, except for the taking of seabird
eggs and molting/non-nesting waterfowl as provided in paragraph (f)(1)
of this section.
(g) North Slope Region.
(1) Southern Unit (Southwestern North Slope regional boundary east
to Peard Bay, everything west of the longitude line 158[deg]30' W and
south of the latitude line 70[deg]45' N to the west bank of the
Ikpikpuk River, and everything south of the latitude line 69[deg]45' N
between the west bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the east bank of
Sagavinirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2-June 29 and July 30-August 31 for seabirds;
April 2-June 19 and July 20-August 31 for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 30-July 29 for seabirds; June 20-July 19 for all
other birds.
(iii) Special Black Brant Hunting Opening: From June 20-July 5. The
open area consists of the coastline, from mean high water line outward
to include open water, from Nokotlek Point east to longitude line
158[deg]30' W. This includes Peard Bay, Kugrua Bay, and Wainwright
Inlet, but not the Kuk and Kugrua river drainages.
(2) Northern Unit (At Peard Bay, everything east of the longitude
line 158[deg]30' W and north of the latitude line 70[deg]45' N to west
bank of the Ikpikpuk River, and everything north of the latitude line
69[deg]45' N between the west bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the east
bank of Sagavinirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2-June 6 and July 7-August 31 for king and common
eiders; April 2-June 15 and July 16-August 31 for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 7-July 6 for king and common eiders; June 16-
July 15 for all other birds.
(3) Eastern Unit (East of eastern bank of the Sagavanirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2-June 19 and July 20-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 20-July 19.
(4) All Units: Yellow-billed loons. Annually, up to 20 yellow-
billed loons total for the region inadvertently entangled in
subsistence fishing nets in the North Slope Region may be kept for
subsistence use.
(5) North Coastal Zone (Cape Thompson north to Point Hope and east
along the Arctic Ocean coastline around Point Barrow to Ross Point,
including Iko Bay, and 5 miles inland).
[[Page 53125]]
(i) No person may at any time, by any means, or in any manner,
possess or have in custody any migratory bird or part thereof, taken in
violation of subpart C and D of this part.
(ii) Upon request from a Service law enforcement officer, hunters
taking, attempting to take, or transporting migratory birds taken
during the subsistence harvest season must present them to the officer
for species identification.
(h) Interior Region.
(1) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31; egg gathering
May 1-June 14 only.
(2) Closure: June 15-July 15.
(i) Upper Copper River Region (Harvest Area: Game Management Units
11 and 13) (Eligible communities: Gulkana, Chitina, Tazlina, Copper
Center, Gakona, Mentasta Lake, Chistochina and Cantwell).
(1) Season: April 15-May 26 and June 27-August 31.
(2) Closure: May 27-June 26.
(3) The Copper River Basin communities listed above also documented
traditional use harvesting birds in Game Management Unit 12, making
them eligible to hunt in this unit using the seasons specified in
paragraph (h) of this section.
(j) Gulf of Alaska Region.
(1) Prince William Sound Area West (Harvest area: Game Management
Unit 6[D]), (Eligible Chugach communities: Chenega Bay, Tatitlek):
(i) Season: April 2-May 31 and July 1-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1-30.
(2) Prince William Sound Area East (Harvest area: Game Management
Units 6[B] and [C]-Barrier Islands between Strawberry Channel and
Softtuk Bar), (Eligible Chugach communities: Cordova):
(i) Season: April 2-April 30 (hunting); May 1-May 31 (gull egg
gathering).
(ii) Closure: May 1-August 31 (hunting); April 2-30 and June 1-
August 31 (gull egg gathering).
(iii) Species Open for Hunting: Greater white-fronted goose; snow
goose; gadwall; Eurasian and American wigeon; blue-winged and green-
winged teal; mallard; northern shoveler; northern pintail; canvasback;
redhead; ring-necked duck; greater and lesser scaup; king and common
eider; harlequin duck; surf, white-winged, and black scoter; long-
tailed duck; bufflehead; common and Barrow's goldeneye; hooded, common,
and red-breasted merganser; and sandhill crane. Species open for egg
gathering: Glaucous-winged, herring, and mew gulls.
(iv) Use of Boats/All-Terrain Vehicles: No hunting from motorized
vehicles or any form of watercraft.
(v) Special Registration: All hunters or egg gatherers must possess
an annual permit, which is available from the Cordova offices of the
Native Village of Eyak and the U.S. Forest Service.
(3) Kachemak Bay Area (Harvest area: Game Management Unit 15[C]
South of a line connecting the tip of Homer Spit to the mouth of Fox
River) (Eligible Chugach Communities: Port Graham, Nanwalek):
(i) Season: April 2-May 31 and July 1-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1-30.
(k) Cook Inlet (Harvest area: Portions of Game Management Unit
16[B] as specified below) (Eligible communities: Tyonek only):
(1) Season: April 2-May 31--That portion of Game Management Unit
16(B) south of the Skwentna River and west of the Yentna River, and
August 1-31--That portion of Game Management Unit 16(B) south of the
Beluga River, Beluga Lake, and the Triumvirate Glacier.
(2) Closure: June 1-July 31.
(l) Southeast Alaska.
(1) Community of Hoonah (Harvest area: National Forest lands in Icy
Strait and Cross Sound, including Middle Pass Rock near the Inian
Islands, Table Rock in Cross Sound, and other traditional locations on
the coast of Yakobi Island. The land and waters of Glacier Bay National
Park remain closed to all subsistence harvesting (50 CFR part
100.3(a)):
(i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg gathering only: May 15-June
30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
(2) Communities of Craig and Hydaburg (Harvest area: Small islands
and adjacent shoreline of western Prince of Wales Island from Point
Baker to Cape Chacon, but also including Coronation and Warren
islands):
(i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg gathering only: May 15-June
30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
(3) Community of Yakutat (Harvest area: Icy Bay (Icy Cape to Point
Riou), and coastal lands and islands bordering the Gulf of Alaska from
Point Manby southeast to and including Dry Bay):
(i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg gathering: May 15-June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
0
3. Amend subpart D by adding Sec. 92.32 to read as follows:
Sec. 92.32 Emergency regulations to protect Steller's eiders.
Upon finding that continuation of these subsistence regulations
would pose an imminent threat to the conservation of threatened
Steller's eiders (Polysticta stelleri), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service Alaska Regional Director, in consultation with the Co-
management Council, will immediately under Sec. 92.21 take action as
is necessary to prevent further take. Regulation changes implemented
could range from a temporary closure of duck hunting in a small
geographic area to large-scale regional or Statewide long-term closures
of all subsistence migratory bird hunting. These closures or temporary
suspensions will remain in effect until the Regional Director, in
consultation with the Co-management Council, determines that the
potential for additional Steller's eiders to be taken no longer exists.
Dated: August 25, 2014.
Michael J. Bean,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2014-21195 Filed 9-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P