Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission, 52334-52335 [2014-20846]

Download as PDF 52334 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 3, 2014 / Notices requirement in NSPS Subpart Kb for all tanks, including GACT tanks; and implement a full top-side and bottomside out-of-service inspection of the tank each time an IFR storage tank is emptied and degassed for any reason. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Abstract for [Z140002] Q: Are solvent transfer racks and transport equipment, which are dedicated for the use of unloading hexane from transport vehicles to a vegetable oil production plant, located at the PICO Northstar Hallock facility (PICO Hallock) in Minnesota, subject to part 63, subpart GGGG, Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production NESHAP or to subpart EEEE, Organic Liquids Distribution (Non-Gasoline) National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants? A: EPA agrees that the PICO Hallock solvent transfer racks and equipment are subject to 40 CFR part 63 subpart GGGG and are not subject to 40 CFR part 63 subpart EEEE, because they would fall under the definition of ‘‘Vegetable oil production process’’ in the rule. Although solvent transfer racks and equipment which are dedicated for the use of unloading hexane from transport vehicles to a vegetable oil production facility are not explicitly mentioned in the definition of vegetable oil production process in 40 CFR part 63 subpart GGGG, they should be considered part of the ‘‘equipment comprising a continuous process for producing crude vegetable oil and meal products’’ when they are used solely to support the vegetable oil production process. EPA believes that the information provided by PICO Hallock confirms that the solvent transfer racks at the facility are exclusively used for this limited purpose. Abstract for [Z140003] Q: Does EPA approve United Services Automobile Association’s (USAA) petition for additional testing hours under 40 CFR 60.4211(f), for additional maintenance checks and readiness testing hours of six emergency generator internal combustion engines at USAA’s San Antonio, Texas headquarters facility? A: Yes. EPA conditionally approves USAA’s request. USAA demonstrated that extensive testing and maintenance of the emergency generators is required to ensure electrical continuity and reliability for maintaining critical operations in a continuous standby mode for immediate emergency use. EPA granted conditional approval of additional testing and maintenance hours on the six engines, provided that the facility maintains documentation to VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:40 Sep 02, 2014 Jkt 232001 show that the additional hours are not used for meeting peak electrical demand. Abstract for [XXXX] Q: Does EPA approve an extension of the initial performance test deadline for a new biomass-fired cogeneration boiler (boiler) due to a force majeure event at the Nippon Paper Industries USA Corporation, Ltd. (NPIUSA) facility in Port Angeles, Washington? A: Yes. EPA determines that a force majeure event, as defined in 40 CFR part 60, subpart A and 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, has occurred and that an extension of the performance test deadline under the applicable federal standards is appropriate. The inability to meet the performance test deadline was caused by circumstances beyond the control of NPIUSA, its contractors, or any entity controlled by NPIUSA and therefore constitutes a force majeure as defined in 40 CFR 60.2 and 63.2. The letters and supporting documentation submitted by NPIUSA provided timely notice, described the claimed force majeure event and why the event prevents NPIUSA from meeting the deadline for conducting the performance testing, what measures are being taken to minimize the delay, and NPIUSA’s proposed date for conducting the testing. The EPA therefore believes it is appropriate to extend the performance test deadline. Dated: August 22, 2014. Lisa Lund, Director, Office of Compliance. [FR Doc. 2014–20895 Filed 9–2–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. AGENCY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collections. Comments are requested concerning: whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB control number. DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before November 3, 2014. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible. ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email PRA@ fcc.gov and to CathyWilliams@fcc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418–2918. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control Number: 3060–0761. Title: Section 79.1, Closed Captioning of Video Programming, CG Docket No. 05–231. Form Number: N/A. Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection. Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; Individuals or households; and Not-for-profit entities. Number of Respondents and Responses: 22,565 respondents; 1,149,437 responses. Estimated Time per Response: 0.25 hours (15 minutes) to 120 hours. Frequency of Response: Annual, onetime and on-occasion reporting requirements; Third party disclosure requirement; Recordkeeping requirement. Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The statutory authority for this obligation is found at section 713 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 613, and implemented at 47 CFR 79.1. Total Annual Burden: 1,254,358 hours. Total Annual Cost: $40,220,496. E:\FR\FM\03SEN1.SGM 03SEN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 3, 2014 / Notices Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: Confidentiality is an issue to the extent that individuals and households provide personally identifiable information, which is covered under the FCC’s system of records notice (SORN), FCC/CGB–1, ‘‘Informal Complaints and Inquiries.’’ As required by the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the Commission also published a SORN, FCC/CGB–1 ‘‘Informal Complaints and Inquiries,’’ in the Federal Register on December 15, 2009 (74 FR 66356) which became effective on January 25, 2010. Privacy Impact Assessment: Yes. Needs and Uses: The Commission seeks to extend existing information collection requirements in its closed captioning rules (47 CFR 79.1), which require that, with some exceptions, all new video programming, and 75 percent of ’’pre-rule’’ programming, be closed captioned. The existing collections include petitions by video programming providers, producers, and owners for exemptions from the closed captioning rules, responses by commenters, and replies; complaints by viewers alleging violations of the closed captioning rules, responses by video programming distributors, and recordkeeping in support of complaint responses; and making video programming distributor contact information available to viewers in phone directories, on the Commission’s Web site and the Web sites of video programming distributors (if they have them), and in billing statements (to the extent video programming distributors issue them). In addition, the Commission seeks to extend proposed information collection requirements. Specifically, on February 20, 2014, the Commission adopted rules governing the quality of closed captioning on television. Closed Captioning of Video Programming; Telecommunications for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Inc. Petition for Rulemaking, CG Docket No. 05–231, Report and Order, Declaratory Ruling, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 29 FCC Rcd 2221 (2014), published at 79 FR 17911 (March 31, 2014). The Commission took the following actions, among others: (a) Required video programming distributors to make best efforts to obtain certification from video programmers that their programming (i) complies with the captioning quality standards established in the Report and Order; (ii) adheres to the Best Practices for video programmers set out in the Report and Order; or (iii) is exempt from the closed captioning rules under one or more properly attained and specified exemptions. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:40 Sep 02, 2014 Jkt 232001 (b) Adopted additional requirements and a ‘‘compliance ladder’’ for broadcasters that use electronic newsroom technique. (c) Required video programming distributors to keep records of their activities related to the maintenance, monitoring, and technical checks of their captioning equipment. (d) Required that petitions requesting an exemption based on the economically burdensome standard and all subsequent pleadings, as well as comments, oppositions, or replies to comments, be filed electronically in accordance with 47 CFR 0.401(a)(1)(iii) instead of as a paper filing. Comments, oppositions, or replies to comments must be served on the other party, by delivering or mailing a copy to the last known address in accordance with 47 CFR 1.47 or by sending a copy to the email address last provided by the party, its attorney, or other duly constituted agent, and must include a certification that the other party was served with a copy. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Managing Director. [FR Doc. 2014–20846 Filed 9–2–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the Receivership of 10129, Flagship National Bank, Bradenton, FL Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (‘‘FDIC’’) as Receiver for Flagship National Bank, Bradenton, Florida (‘‘the Receiver’’) intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed receiver of Flagship National Bank on October 23, 2009. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors. Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this Notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing and PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 52335 sent within thirty days of the date of this Notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 32.1, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201. No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame. Dated: August 28, 2014. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–20879 Filed 9–2–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714–01–P FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL [Docket No. AS14–08] Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. ACTION: Notice of meeting. AGENCY: Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting: Location: Federal Reserve Board— International Square location: 1850 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20006. Date: September 10, 2014. Time: 10:30 a.m. Status: Open. Reports Chairman Executive Director Delegated State Compliance Reviews Financial Report Appraisal Subcommittee Advisory Committee Action Items June 11, 2014 minutes—Open Session FY15 Appraisal Foundation Grant Proposal FY15 State Grant—Appraisal Foundation Education Proposal Appraisal Foundation Supplemental Grant Request ASC FY15 Budget Proposal How to Attend and Observe an ASC meeting: If you plan to attend the meeting in person, we ask that you notify the Federal Reserve Board via email at appraisal-questions@frb.gov, requesting E:\FR\FM\03SEN1.SGM 03SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52334-52335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20846]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal 
Communications Commission

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, 
and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
3501-3520), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on the following information collections. 
Comments are requested concerning: whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the 
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the 
information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer 
than 25 employees. The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of 
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. No 
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a 
collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a 
valid OMB control number.

DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before November 
3, 2014. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but 
find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this 
notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email 
PRA@fcc.gov and to CathyWilliams@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the 
information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418-2918.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control Number: 3060-0761.
    Title: Section 79.1, Closed Captioning of Video Programming, CG 
Docket No. 05-231.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities; Individuals or 
households; and Not-for-profit entities.
    Number of Respondents and Responses: 22,565 respondents; 1,149,437 
responses.
    Estimated Time per Response: 0.25 hours (15 minutes) to 120 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Annual, one-time and on-occasion reporting 
requirements; Third party disclosure requirement; Recordkeeping 
requirement.
    Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The 
statutory authority for this obligation is found at section 713 of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 613, and implemented 
at 47 CFR 79.1.
    Total Annual Burden: 1,254,358 hours.
    Total Annual Cost: $40,220,496.

[[Page 52335]]

    Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: Confidentiality is an issue 
to the extent that individuals and households provide personally 
identifiable information, which is covered under the FCC's system of 
records notice (SORN), FCC/CGB-1, ``Informal Complaints and 
Inquiries.'' As required by the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the 
Commission also published a SORN, FCC/CGB-1 ``Informal Complaints and 
Inquiries,'' in the Federal Register on December 15, 2009 (74 FR 66356) 
which became effective on January 25, 2010.
    Privacy Impact Assessment: Yes.
    Needs and Uses: The Commission seeks to extend existing information 
collection requirements in its closed captioning rules (47 CFR 79.1), 
which require that, with some exceptions, all new video programming, 
and 75 percent of ''pre-rule'' programming, be closed captioned. The 
existing collections include petitions by video programming providers, 
producers, and owners for exemptions from the closed captioning rules, 
responses by commenters, and replies; complaints by viewers alleging 
violations of the closed captioning rules, responses by video 
programming distributors, and recordkeeping in support of complaint 
responses; and making video programming distributor contact information 
available to viewers in phone directories, on the Commission's Web site 
and the Web sites of video programming distributors (if they have 
them), and in billing statements (to the extent video programming 
distributors issue them). In addition, the Commission seeks to extend 
proposed information collection requirements. Specifically, on February 
20, 2014, the Commission adopted rules governing the quality of closed 
captioning on television. Closed Captioning of Video Programming; 
Telecommunications for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Inc. Petition for 
Rulemaking, CG Docket No. 05-231, Report and Order, Declaratory Ruling, 
and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 29 FCC Rcd 2221 (2014), 
published at 79 FR 17911 (March 31, 2014). The Commission took the 
following actions, among others:
    (a) Required video programming distributors to make best efforts to 
obtain certification from video programmers that their programming (i) 
complies with the captioning quality standards established in the 
Report and Order; (ii) adheres to the Best Practices for video 
programmers set out in the Report and Order; or (iii) is exempt from 
the closed captioning rules under one or more properly attained and 
specified exemptions.
    (b) Adopted additional requirements and a ``compliance ladder'' for 
broadcasters that use electronic newsroom technique.
    (c) Required video programming distributors to keep records of 
their activities related to the maintenance, monitoring, and technical 
checks of their captioning equipment.
    (d) Required that petitions requesting an exemption based on the 
economically burdensome standard and all subsequent pleadings, as well 
as comments, oppositions, or replies to comments, be filed 
electronically in accordance with 47 CFR 0.401(a)(1)(iii) instead of as 
a paper filing. Comments, oppositions, or replies to comments must be 
served on the other party, by delivering or mailing a copy to the last 
known address in accordance with 47 CFR 1.47 or by sending a copy to 
the email address last provided by the party, its attorney, or other 
duly constituted agent, and must include a certification that the other 
party was served with a copy.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-20846 Filed 9-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.