Safety Zone; Gulfstar 1 SPAR, Mississippi Canyon Block 724, Outer Continental Shelf on the Gulf of Mexico, 51898-51899 [2014-20843]
Download as PDF
51898
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 169 / Tuesday, September 2, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
A. Regulatory History and Information
On May 21, 2014 we published a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
with a request for comments entitled,
‘‘Safety Zone; Gulfstar 1 SPAR,
Mississippi Canyon Block 724, Outer
Continental Shelf on the Gulf of
Mexico’’ in the Federal Register (79 FR
29095). We received no comments on
the NPRM.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 147
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0242]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Gulfstar 1 SPAR,
Mississippi Canyon Block 724, Outer
Continental Shelf on the Gulf of Mexico
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone around the
Gulfstar 1 SPAR, Mississippi Canyon
Block 724 on the Outer Continental
Shelf (OCS) in the Gulf of Mexico. The
purpose of the safety zone is to protect
the facility from vessels operating
outside the normal shipping channels
and fairways. Placing a safety zone
around the facility will significantly
reduce the threat of allisions, oil spills,
and releases of natural gas, and thereby
protect the safety of life, property, and
the environment.
DATES: This rule is effective October 2,
2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2014–0242. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Rusty Wright, U.S. Coast
Guard, District Eight Waterways
Management Branch; telephone 504–
671–2138, rusty.h.wright@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on the docket, call
Cheryl F. Collins, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
OCS Outer Continental Shelf
USCG United States Coast Guard
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Aug 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
B. Basis and Purpose
Under the authority provided in 14
U.S.C. 85, 43 U.S.C. 1333, and
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1, 33 CFR part 147
permits the establishment of safety
zones for facilities located on the OCS
for the purpose of protecting life,
property and the marine environment.
Williams Midstream requested that the
Coast Guard establish a safety zone
around its facility located in the
deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico on
the OCS. Placing a safety zone around
the facility will significantly reduce the
threat of allisions, oil spills, and
releases of natural gas, and thereby
protect the safety of life, property, and
the environment.
For the purpose of safety zones
established under 33 CFR part 147, the
deepwater area is considered to be
waters of 304.8 meters (1,000 feet) or
greater depth extending to the limits of
the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)
contiguous to the territorial sea of the
United States and extending to a
distance up to 200 nautical miles from
the baseline from which the breadth of
the sea is measured. Navigation in the
vicinity of the safety zone consists of
large commercial shipping vessels,
fishing vessels, cruise ships, tugs with
tows and the occasional recreational
vessel. The deepwater area also includes
an extensive system of fairways.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Final Rule
We received no comments in response
to the proposed rule and the final rule
is publishing without change.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. This rule is not a significant
regulatory action due to the location of
the Gulfstar 1 SPAR—on the Outer
Continental Shelf—and its distance
from both land and safety fairways.
Vessel traffic can pass safely around the
safety zone using alternate routes.
Exceptions to this rule include vessels
measuring less than 100 feet in length
overall and not engaged in towing.
Deviation to transit through the safety
zone may be requested. Such requests
will be considered on a case-by-case
basis and may be authorized by the
Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District or a designated representative.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
Mississippi Canyon Block 724, where
this safety zone is now established.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact or a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: Vessel traffic can
pass safely around the safety zone using
an alternate route. Use of an alternate
route may cause minimal delay in
reaching a final destination, depending
on other traffic in the area and vessel
speed. Additionally, exceptions to this
rule include vessels measuring less than
100 feet in length overall and not
engaged in towing. Also, vessels may
request deviation from this rule to
transit through the safety zone. Such
requests will be considered on a caseby-case basis and may be authorized by
the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District or a designated representative.
Therefore, the Coast Guard expects any
impact of this rulemaking establishing a
safety zone around an OCS facility to be
minimal, with no significant economic
impact on small entities.
E:\FR\FM\02SER1.SGM
02SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 169 / Tuesday, September 2, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
3. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
4. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
5. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
7. Taking of Private Property
This rule would not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
8. Civil Justice Reform
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
9. Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Aug 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
10. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
11. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
12. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
13. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone around an OCS Facility to protect
life, property and the marine
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. The
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 147
Continental shelf, Marine safety,
Navigation (water).
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 147 as follows:
PART 147—SAFETY ZONES
1. The authority citation for part 147
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 85; 43 U.S.C. 1333;
and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
■
51899
2. Add § 147.859 to read as follows:
§ 147.859 Safety Zone; Gulfstar 1 SPAR,
Mississippi Canyon Block 724, Outer
Continental Shelf on the Gulf of Mexico.
(a) Description. The Gulfstar 1 Spar is
in the deepwater area of the Gulf of
Mexico at Mississippi Canyon Block
724. The facility is located at
28°14′05.904″ N, 88°59′43.306″ W, and
the area within 500 meters (1640.4 feet)
from each point on the facility
structure’s outer edge is a safety zone.
(b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or
remain in this safety zone except the
following:
(1) An attending vessel;
(2) A vessel under 100 feet in length
overall not engaged in towing; or
(3) A vessel authorized by the
Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District or a designated representative.
Dated: August 6, 2014.
Kevin S. Cook,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014–20843 Filed 8–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 9 and 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2012–0727; FRL–9914–19]
RIN 2070–AB27
Significant New Use Rules on Certain
Chemical Substances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is finalizing significant
new use rules (SNURs) under section
5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control
Act (TSCA) for 36 chemical substances
which were the subject of
premanufacture notices (PMNs).
Seventeen of these chemical substances
are subject to TSCA section 5(e) consent
orders issued by EPA. This action
requires persons who intend to
manufacture or process any of these 36
chemical substances for an activity that
is designated as a significant new use by
this final rule to notify EPA at least 90
days before commencing that activity.
The required notification provides EPA
with the opportunity to evaluate the
intended use and, if necessary, to
prohibit or limit that activity before it
occurs.
DATES: This final rule is effective
November 3, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02SER1.SGM
02SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51898-51899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20843]
[[Page 51898]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 147
[Docket No. USCG-2014-0242]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Gulfstar 1 SPAR, Mississippi Canyon Block 724, Outer
Continental Shelf on the Gulf of Mexico
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone around the
Gulfstar 1 SPAR, Mississippi Canyon Block 724 on the Outer Continental
Shelf (OCS) in the Gulf of Mexico. The purpose of the safety zone is to
protect the facility from vessels operating outside the normal shipping
channels and fairways. Placing a safety zone around the facility will
significantly reduce the threat of allisions, oil spills, and releases
of natural gas, and thereby protect the safety of life, property, and
the environment.
DATES: This rule is effective October 2, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2014-0242. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Rusty Wright, U.S. Coast Guard, District Eight
Waterways Management Branch; telephone 504-671-2138,
rusty.h.wright@uscg.mil. If you have questions on the docket, call
Cheryl F. Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
OCS Outer Continental Shelf
USCG United States Coast Guard
A. Regulatory History and Information
On May 21, 2014 we published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
with a request for comments entitled, ``Safety Zone; Gulfstar 1 SPAR,
Mississippi Canyon Block 724, Outer Continental Shelf on the Gulf of
Mexico'' in the Federal Register (79 FR 29095). We received no comments
on the NPRM.
B. Basis and Purpose
Under the authority provided in 14 U.S.C. 85, 43 U.S.C. 1333, and
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, 33 CFR part 147
permits the establishment of safety zones for facilities located on the
OCS for the purpose of protecting life, property and the marine
environment. Williams Midstream requested that the Coast Guard
establish a safety zone around its facility located in the deepwater
area of the Gulf of Mexico on the OCS. Placing a safety zone around the
facility will significantly reduce the threat of allisions, oil spills,
and releases of natural gas, and thereby protect the safety of life,
property, and the environment.
For the purpose of safety zones established under 33 CFR part 147,
the deepwater area is considered to be waters of 304.8 meters (1,000
feet) or greater depth extending to the limits of the Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ) contiguous to the territorial sea of the United
States and extending to a distance up to 200 nautical miles from the
baseline from which the breadth of the sea is measured. Navigation in
the vicinity of the safety zone consists of large commercial shipping
vessels, fishing vessels, cruise ships, tugs with tows and the
occasional recreational vessel. The deepwater area also includes an
extensive system of fairways.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule
We received no comments in response to the proposed rule and the
final rule is publishing without change.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. This rule is not a
significant regulatory action due to the location of the Gulfstar 1
SPAR--on the Outer Continental Shelf--and its distance from both land
and safety fairways. Vessel traffic can pass safely around the safety
zone using alternate routes. Exceptions to this rule include vessels
measuring less than 100 feet in length overall and not engaged in
towing. Deviation to transit through the safety zone may be requested.
Such requests will be considered on a case-by-case basis and may be
authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District or a
designated representative.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This rule would affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in Mississippi Canyon Block 724, where this safety
zone is now established.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact or a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: Vessel
traffic can pass safely around the safety zone using an alternate
route. Use of an alternate route may cause minimal delay in reaching a
final destination, depending on other traffic in the area and vessel
speed. Additionally, exceptions to this rule include vessels measuring
less than 100 feet in length overall and not engaged in towing. Also,
vessels may request deviation from this rule to transit through the
safety zone. Such requests will be considered on a case-by-case basis
and may be authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District or
a designated representative. Therefore, the Coast Guard expects any
impact of this rulemaking establishing a safety zone around an OCS
facility to be minimal, with no significant economic impact on small
entities.
[[Page 51899]]
3. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
4. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
5. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
7. Taking of Private Property
This rule would not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
8. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
9. Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
10. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
11. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
12. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
13. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule involves the establishment
of a safety zone around an OCS Facility to protect life, property and
the marine environment. This rule is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant
Instruction. The environmental analysis checklist supporting this
determination and Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 147
Continental shelf, Marine safety, Navigation (water).
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 147 as follows:
PART 147--SAFETY ZONES
0
1. The authority citation for part 147 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 85; 43 U.S.C. 1333; and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 147.859 to read as follows:
Sec. 147.859 Safety Zone; Gulfstar 1 SPAR, Mississippi Canyon Block
724, Outer Continental Shelf on the Gulf of Mexico.
(a) Description. The Gulfstar 1 Spar is in the deepwater area of
the Gulf of Mexico at Mississippi Canyon Block 724. The facility is
located at 28[deg]14'05.904'' N, 88[deg]59'43.306'' W, and the area
within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) from each point on the facility
structure's outer edge is a safety zone.
(b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone
except the following:
(1) An attending vessel;
(2) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in
towing; or
(3) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District or a designated representative.
Dated: August 6, 2014.
Kevin S. Cook,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014-20843 Filed 8-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-15-P