Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Guidance for Industry on Fees for Human Drug Compounding Outsourcing Facilities Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 52012-52016 [2014-20719]
Download as PDF
52012
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 169 / Tuesday, September 2, 2014 / Notices
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) Minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses; and (e) Assess information
collection costs.
To request additional information on
the proposed project or to obtain a copy
of the information collection plan and
instruments, call (404) 639–7570 or
send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Written
comments and/or suggestions regarding
the items contained in this notice
should be directed to the Attention:
CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management
and Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or
by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written
comments should be received within 30
days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Focus Group Testing to Effectively
Plan and Tailor Cancer Prevention and
Control Communication Campaigns
(OMB No. 0920–0800, exp. 11/30/
2014)—Extension—National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The mission of the CDC’s Division of
Cancer Prevention and Control (DCPC)
is to reduce the burden of cancer in the
United States through cancer
prevention, reduction of risk, early
detection, better treatment, and
improved quality of life for cancer
survivors. Toward this end, the DCPC
supports the scientific development,
implementation, and evaluation of
various health communication
campaigns with an emphasis on specific
cancer burdens. This process requires
testing of messages, concepts, and
materials prior to their final
development and dissemination.
Communication campaigns vary
according to the type of cancer, the
qualitative dimensions of the message
described above, and the type of
respondents.
CDC is currently approved to collect
information needed to plan and tailor
cancer communication campaigns (OMB
No. 0920–0800, exp. 11/30/2014), and
seeks OMB approval to extend the
existing generic clearance. No changes
to the scope of the clearance or data
collection methodology are proposed.
There are small decreases in the
annualized estimates for the number of
respondents and burden hours.
Information will be collected
primarily through focus groups, and
will be used to assess numerous
qualitative dimensions of cancer
prevention and control messages,
including, but not limited to,
knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, behavioral
intentions, information needs and
sources, and compliance to
recommended screening intervals.
Insights gained from the focus groups
will assist in the development and/or
refinement of future campaign messages
and materials.
DCPC plans to conduct or sponsor up
to 80 focus groups per year over a threeyear period. An average of 10
respondents will participate in each
focus group discussion. Screening will
be conducted to recruit respondents for
specific target audiences, e.g., the
general public or health care providers.
The estimated burden per response for
screening is three minutes. Each focus
group discussion will be facilitated by a
written discussion guide, and will last
approximately two hours. CDC will
submit an information collection
request to OMB for approval of each
focus group activity.
OMB approval is requested for three
years. There are no changes to
information collection purpose or
methodology. There are minor
reductions in the annualized estimates
for the number of respondents and
corresponding burden hours.
Participation is voluntary and there
are no costs to respondents except their
time. The total estimated annualized
burden hours are 1,680.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents
Form name
General Public ................................................
Screening Form ..............................................
Focus Group Guide ........................................
Screening Form ..............................................
Focus Group Guide ........................................
Health Care Professionals ..............................
Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the
Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2014–D–0329]
[FR Doc. 2014–20718 Filed 8–29–14; 8:45 am]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Guidance for
Industry on Fees for Human Drug
Compounding Outsourcing Facilities
Under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:57 Aug 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Number of
responses per
respondent
960
480
640
320
ACTION:
1
1
1
1
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
3/60
2
3/60
2
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA).
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by October 2,
2014.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 169 / Tuesday, September 2, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
202–395–7285, or emailed to oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
title. Also include the FDA docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA
PRA Staff, Office of Operations, Food
and Drug Administration, 8455
Colesville Rd., COLE–14526, Silver
Spring, MD 20993–0002, PRAStaff@
fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Guidance for Industry on Fees for
Human Drug Compounding
Outsourcing Facilities Under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
In the Federal Register of April 1,
2014 (79 FR 18297), FDA announced the
availability of the draft guidance for
industry entitled ‘‘Fees for Human Drug
Compounding Outsourcing Facilities
Under Sections 503B and 744K of the
FD&C Act.’’ On November 27, 2013,
President Obama signed the Drug
Quality and Security Act (DQSA) (Pub.
L. 113–54) into law. The DQSA added
a new section 503B to the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 353B) that created a category of
entities called ‘‘outsourcing facilities.’’
Outsourcing facilities, as defined in
section 503B(d)(4) of the FD&C Act, are
facilities that meet certain requirements
described in section 503B, including,
registering with FDA as an outsourcing
facility and paying associated fees. Drug
products compounded in an
outsourcing facility can qualify for
exemptions from the FDA approval
requirements in section 505 of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 355) and the requirement
to label products with adequate
directions for use under section
502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
352(f)(1)) if the requirements in section
503B of the FD&C Act are met.
This guidance describes in detail the
fee types and amounts an entity must
pay to satisfy the fee requirements of
sections 503B and 744K of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 379j–62) to be deemed an
outsourcing facility and maintain its
status as an outsourcing facility, the
adjustments to the fees required by law,
how to qualify as a small business to
obtain a reduction of the annual
establishment fee, how and when to
submit payment to FDA, the effect of
failure to pay fees, and fee-related
dispute resolution.
In response to the April 1, 2014,
Federal Register notice, FDA received
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:57 Aug 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
one comment on the draft guidance,
which raised several issues pertaining to
the information collection provisions in
the draft guidance. These issues are
discussed below.
(Issue 1) The comment asserted that
placement of facilities on a list of
registered outsourcing facilities in fiscal
year (FY) 2014 (before any registered
outsourcing facilities had paid the
required establishment fee) is contrary
to the language of the DQSA, because
those entities had not yet paid the
requisite establishment fee and,
therefore, could not qualify as
outsourcing facilities. The comment
recommended that FDA interpret the
DQSA to require that a facility be
required to pay the establishment fee in
full to be deemed a ‘‘registered
outsourcing facility.’’
(Response) As the comment points
out, section 744K(g)(3)(A) of the FD&C
Act provides that ‘‘[a]n outsourcing
facility shall not be considered
registered under section 503B(b) in a
fiscal year until the date that the
outsourcing facility remits the
establishment fee under this subsection
for such fiscal year.’’ Section 744K(a)(1),
however, provides that ‘‘[f]or fiscal year
2015 and each subsequent fiscal year,
the Secretary shall, in accordance with
this subsection, assess and collect—(A)
an annual establishment fee from each
outsourcing facility.’’ The plain
language of the statute makes clear that
FDA is not to assess and collect the
annual establishment fee for human
drug outsourcing facilities until FY
2015. Because the fee provisions of the
DQSA, under section 744K, do not
become effective until FY 2015, no fees
are due in 2014, and payment of the
establishment fee is not a prerequisite to
registration in FY 2014. Therefore,
failure to pay a fee was not a bar to
registration as an outsourcing facility or
to FDA placing such facilities on its list
of registered outsourcing facilities on its
Web site in FY 2014. Accordingly, FDA
will not revise the proposed guidance to
reflect the points addressed in the
comment on issue one.
(Issue 2) The comment expressed
concern regarding FDA’s estimation in
the notice accompanying the guidance
that only 20 of the current (at the time
the notice was published) 43 facilities
that registered in FY 2014 will pay the
required establishment fee and be
deemed registered outsourcing facilities
for FY 2015.
(Response) FDA’s estimates at the
time the guidance was published, just a
few months after the legislation was
enacted, were its best estimates of how
many firms were likely to register as
outsourcing facilities. Registration as an
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52013
outsourcing facility is a voluntary
process, and FDA cannot predict with
any certainty how many firms will
register. As of July 18, 2014, 51 firms
were registered. However, since
registration began in December 2013,
some firms have registered and then deregistered. Estimates of how many
facilities will register in FY 2015 and
beyond when establishment fees take
effect are highly uncertain. Thus, for
purposes of calculating the information
collection burden in the final guidance,
in tables 1–3, FDA is estimating that
approximately 50 outsourcing facilities
will register and pay establishment fees,
and we have adjusted the other
estimates (except for the ‘‘Average
Burden per Response’’) accordingly.
(Issue 3) The comment noted that
FDA failed to correlate the deadline to
submit a request for a small business fee
reduction with the deadline to comment
on the small business reduction
program in general. The comment noted
that the deadline to submit a request for
a small business reduction preceded the
deadline for submitting comments to the
public docket on the draft guidance. The
comment suggested that this failure
preempted stakeholders from submitting
comments on the small business
reduction program prior to the deadline
for submitting their request to receive
the small business reduction. The
commenter expressed concern that FDA
is not soliciting adequate input from
interested parties. The commenter
recommended that FDA provide more
opportunities for stakeholder input.
Moreover, the comment suggested that
FDA extend the deadline for submitting
small business reduction requests to
such time as FDA has reviewed all
comments.
(Response) FDA notes that section
744K(c)(4)(B) states that ‘‘[t]o qualify for
the exception under this paragraph, a
small business shall submit to the
Secretary a written request for such
exception . . . to the Secretary not later
than April 30 of such immediately
preceding fiscal year.’’ The annual April
30 deadline for requesting a small
business reduction is not a creation of
FDA and the draft guidance; it is a
statutory requirement mandated by
Congress. FDA cannot to revise the
deadline enacted by Congress.
Accordingly, FDA will not revise the
draft guidance to permit entities to
submit FY 2015 small business
reduction requests after April 30, 2014.
In addition, notwithstanding the fact
that the deadline to submit a small
business reduction request preceded the
deadline to submit comments on the
draft guidance, the public had a full and
meaningful opportunity to submit
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
52014
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 169 / Tuesday, September 2, 2014 / Notices
comments on the draft guidance. The
draft guidance was made available on
April 1, 2014, and the period to provide
comments lasted 60 days, closing on
June 2, 2014. FDA reviewed all
comments submitted and considered
each of them carefully. Having
considered all comments received, FDA
will not revise the draft guidance in
response to comments on Issue 3.
Furthermore, FDA has recently held a
series of meetings with stakeholders to
hear their views and concerns on any
aspects of FDA’s implementation of the
DQSA they wanted to discuss. Over 40
organizations participated, including
the commenter, and there was a robust
discussion of the issues and concerns
associated with many aspects of the
implementation effort. FDA will
consider the input provided during
these meetings as it moves forward to
implement the DQSA.
(Issue 4) The comment noted that
FDA has not provided adequate
guidance on the standards to which
section 503B and 503A facilities will be
held. This lack of guidance, the
comment argues, creates uncertainty
and confusion in the compounding
industry about standards of practice
expected by FDA. The comment further
noted that notwithstanding the lack of
guidance and the confusion within the
industry, FDA has not provided an
opportunity for facilities to decline to
operate as outsourcing facilities under
section 503B and instead identify
themselves as section 503A pharmacies.
Instead, the comment notes, FDA has
dictated that all of these facilities will
be deemed in violation of the new drug
requirements of the FD&C Act and in
possession of misbranded drugs until
they pay the establishment fee. The
comment recommends that FDA outline
a clear process for outsourcing facilities
interested in withdrawing their section
503B registration packets and instead
identifying and operating as section
503A regulated pharmacies.
(Response) FDA notes that the
comments focus primarily on matters
not covered by the draft guidance, i.e.,
the standards for satisfying the
conditions necessary to qualify for the
exemptions under sections 503A and
503B of the FD&C Act. These standards
will be addressed in other guidance and
regulations, such as the recently issued
final guidance entitled ‘‘Pharmacy
Compounding of Human Drug Products
Under Section 503A of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,’’ (79 FR
37742, July 2, 2014) and the draft
guidance entitled, ‘‘Current Good
Manufacturing Practice—Interim
Guidance for Human Drug
Compounding Outsourcing Facilities
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:57 Aug 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
Under Section 503B of the FD&C Act.’’
(79 FR 37743, July 2, 2014). Because the
draft fees guidance does not discuss the
substantive provisions of section 503A
or 503B of the FD&C Act—focusing
instead on sections 744J (21 U.S.C. 379j61) and 744K of the FD&C Act—the
response to this issue cannot be
addressed in the context of this draft
guidance. Accordingly, FDA will not
incorporate the recommendations
suggested in the comments on this issue
into the final version of this draft
guidance.
With regard to providing a process for
registered outsourcing facilities to deregister and identify themselves as
section 503A pharmacies, the final
guidance describes how a registered
outsourcing facility can de-register.
With regard to the substantive effect of
de-registering, the law, the guidance,
and information on FDA’s Web site
make it clear that a facility has three
choices: (1) Comply with the FDA
approval requirements in section 505 of
the FD&C Act, the requirement to label
products with adequate directions for
use under section 502(f)(1) of the FD&C
Act, and the requirements for current
good manufacturing practices under
section 501(a)(2)(B)) of the FD&C Act;
(2) meet the conditions to qualify for the
exemptions from these three
requirements by meeting the conditions
to qualify for the exemptions under
section 503A of the FD&C Act; or (3)
register as an outsourcing facility and
meet the conditions under section 503B
of the FD&C Act to qualify for the
exemptions from the FDA approval
requirements and adequate directions
for use. A firm’s compliance status will
be determined by whether they have
registered as an outsourcing facility and
are meeting the conditions of section
503B (including payment of the
required fee if they register on or after
October 1, 2014), or if they have not
registered, whether they are meeting the
conditions of section 503A of the FD&C
Act. If they are not meeting the
conditions necessary to qualify for the
exemptions under either section 503A
or 503B, they may be held to be in
violation of any applicable provisions of
the FD&C Act.
Burden estimates: As discussed
previously, the guidance pertains to
entities that compound human drugs
and elect to register as outsourcing
facilities. These outsourcing facilities
must pay certain fees to FDA. The
guidance describes the fee types and
amounts, the adjustments to fees
required by law, how to submit
payment, the effect of failure to pay fees,
and how to qualify as a small business
to obtain a reduction of the annual
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
establishment fee. The guidance
contains the following collections of
information:
As described in section III.A of the
guidance, upon receiving registration
information from a facility seeking to
register as an outsourcing facility, FDA
will send an invoice for an
establishment fee to the outsourcing
facility. The invoice contains
instructions for paying the
establishment fee, as discussed in
section III.E of the guidance. This
process would be repeated annually
under the timeframes described in the
guidance. An outsourcing facility is not
considered registered until the required
establishment fee is paid for that fiscal
year.
We estimate that annually a total of 50
outsourcing facilities (‘‘No. of
Respondents’’ in table 1, row 1) will pay
to FDA 50 establishment fees (‘‘Total
Annual Responses’’ in table 1, row 1) as
described in the guidance. We also
estimate that it will take an outsourcing
facility 0.50 hours to prepare and
submit to FDA each establishment fee
(‘‘Average Burden per Response’’ in
table 1, row 1).
As described in section III.C of the
guidance, outsourcing facilities that are
reinspected will be assessed a
reinspection fee for each reinspection.
The reinspection fee is designed to
reimburse FDA when it must visit a
particular outsourcing facility more than
once because of noncompliance
identified during a previous inspection.
A reinspection fee will be incurred for
each reinspection that occurs. After
FDA conducts a reinspection, we will
send an invoice to the email address
indicated in the facility’s registration
file. The invoice contains instructions
for paying the reinspection fee, as
discussed in section III.E of the
guidance.
We estimate that annually a total of 15
outsourcing facilities (‘‘No. of
Respondents’’ in table 2, row 1) will pay
to FDA 15 reinspection fees (‘‘Total
Annual Responses’’ in table 2, row 1) as
described in the guidance. We also
estimate that it will take an outsourcing
facility 0.50 hours to prepare and
submit to FDA each reinspection fee
(‘‘Average Burden per Response’’ in
table 2, row 1).
As described in section III.D of the
guidance, certain outsourcing facilities
may qualify for a small business
reduction in the amount of the annual
establishment fee. To qualify for this
reduction, an outsourcing facility must
submit to FDA a written request
certifying that the entity meets the
requirements for the reduction. For
every fiscal year that the firm seeks to
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 169 / Tuesday, September 2, 2014 / Notices
qualify as a small business and receive
the fee reduction, the written request
must be submitted to FDA by April 30
of the preceding the fiscal year. For
example, an outsourcing facility must
submit a written request for the small
business reduction by April 30, 2015, to
qualify for a reduction in the FY 2016
annual establishment fee. As described
in the guidance, section 744K of the
FD&C Act also requires an outsourcing
facility to submit its written request for
a small business reduction in a format
specified by FDA in the guidance. The
guidance specifies that Form FDA 3908
is the format for submitting requests for
a small business fee reduction.
We estimate that annually a total of 15
outsourcing facilities (‘‘No. of
Respondents’’ in table 1, row 2) will
submit to FDA a request for a small
business reduction in the amount of the
annual establishment fee. We estimate
that 15 outsourcing facilities will submit
Form FDA 3908 (‘‘Total Annual
Responses’’ in table 1, row 2) to FDA
annually, as described in the guidance,
and that it will take an outsourcing
facility 25 hours to prepare and submit
to FDA each Form FDA 3908 (‘‘Average
Burden per Response’’ in table 1, row 2).
As described in section III.D of the
guidance, those outsourcing facilities
that request a small business reduction
in the amount of the annual
establishment fee will receive a small
business designation letter notifying the
facility of FDA’s decision. Outsourcing
facilities eligible to pay a reduced fee
should maintain a copy of the small
business designation letter applicable to
that fiscal year for their records.
We estimate that annually a total of 15
outsourcing facilities (‘‘No. of
Recordkeepers’’ in table 3) will keep a
copy of their small business designation
letter (‘‘Total Annual Records’’ in table
3), and that maintaining each record
will take 0.5 hours (‘‘Average Burden
Per Recordkeeping’’ in table 3).
As described in section V.B of the
guidance, an outsourcing facility may
request a reconsideration under 21 CFR
10.75 of an FDA decision related to the
fee provisions of section 744K of the
FD&C Act. As explained in the
guidance, the request should state the
facility’s rationale for its position that
the decision was in error and include
any additional information that is
relevant to the outsourcing facility’s
argument.
52015
We estimate that a total of 6
outsourcing facilities (‘‘No. of
Respondents’’ in table 2, row 2)
annually will submit to FDA a request
for reconsideration as described in the
guidance. We estimate that it will take
an outsourcing facility 1 hour to prepare
and submit to FDA each request for
reconsideration (‘‘Average Burden Per
Response’’ in table 2, row 2).
As described in section V.B of the
guidance, an outsourcing facility may
appeal, as set forth in § 10.75, an FDA
denial of a request for reconsideration of
an FDA decision related to the fee
provisions of section 744K of the FD&C
Act.
We estimate that a total of 3
outsourcing facilities (‘‘No. of
Respondents’’ in table 2, row 3)
annually will submit an appeal of an
FDA denial of a request for
reconsideration. We estimate that it will
take an outsourcing facility 1 hour to
prepare and submit each appeal under
§ 10.75 (‘‘Average Burden Per
Response’’ in table 2, row 3).
The estimated reporting and
recordkeeping burdens for this
collection of information are as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN—ESTABLISHMENT FEE 1
Number of
respondents
Type of reporting
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Average
burden per
response
Total hours
Payment of annual establishment fee ....................................
Request for small business establishment fee reduction
(FDA Form 3908).
50
15
1
1
50
15
0.5 (30 min.)
25 ................
25
375
Total ................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
.....................
400
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN—REINSPECTION FEE AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION REQUESTS 1
Number of
respondents
Type of reporting
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Average
burden per
response
Total hours
Payment of re-inspection fee ...............................................
Reconsideration request ......................................................
Appeal request .....................................................................
15
6
3
1
1
1
15
6
3
0.5 (30 min.)
1 ..................
1 ..................
7.50
6
3
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
.....................
16.50
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
TABLE 3—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1
Number of
recordkeepers
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Type of recordkeeping
Copy of small business designation letter ...........................
1 There
Number of
records per
recordkeeper
15
Total annual
records
1
15
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:57 Aug 29, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
Average
burden per
record
0.5 (30 min.)
Total hours
7.50
52016
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 169 / Tuesday, September 2, 2014 / Notices
Dated: August 26, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
[FR Doc. 2014–20719 Filed 8–29–14; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2014–20715 Filed 8–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
National Institute of Diabetes and
Digestive and Kidney Diseases; Notice
of Closed Meetings
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Neurological
Disorders and Stroke; Notice of Closed
Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: Neurological Sciences
Training Initial Review Group, Neurological
Sciences and Disorders A.
Date: October 27–28, 2014.
Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: The Westin Georgetown, 2350 M
Street NW., Washington, DC 20037.
Contact Person: Natalia Strunnikova,
Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific
Review Branch, Division of Extramural
Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience
Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite
3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892–9529,
301–402–0288, natalia.strunnikova@nih.gov.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research
Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854,
Biological Basis Research in the
Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health,
HHS)
Dated: August 26, 2014.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–20714 Filed 8–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:57 Aug 29, 2014
Dated: August 26, 2014.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
Jkt 232001
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S. C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meetings.
The meetings will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.
C., as amended. The grant applications
and the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: National Institute of
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Special Emphasis Panel; DEM Fellowship
Applications Review.
Date: October 2–3, 2014.
Time: 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Melrose Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20037.
Contact Person: Carol J. Goter-Robinson,
Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review
Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of
Health, Room 748, 6707 Democracy
Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892–5452, (301)
594–7791, goterrobinsonc@
extra.niddk.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: National Institute of
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK Diabetes
Research Centers (P30)–RFA–DDK13–004.
Date: October 20, 2014.
Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Residence Inn Bethesda Downtown,
7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD
20814.
Contact Person: Najma Begum, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch,
DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health,
Room 749, 6707 Democracy Boulevard,
Bethesda, MD 20892–5452, (301) 594–8894,
begumn@niddk.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes,
Endocrinology and Metabolic Research;
93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition
Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology
and Hematology Research, National Institutes
of Health, HHS)
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute; Notice of Meeting
Notice is hereby given of a change in
the meeting of the National Heart, Lung,
and Blood Advisory Council Meeting,
September 9, 2014, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m., National Institutes of Health,
Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda,
MD 20892, which was published in the
Federal Register on July 18, 2014, 79 FR
42024.
This notice is being amended to notify
the public of a change in start time of
the National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Advisory Council Meeting from 12:30
p.m. to 1:00 p.m. on September 9, 2014.
This notice is also being amended to
indicate a possible change to the start
time (8:00 a.m.) of the September 10,
2014 meeting. The meeting start time
will be determined at the end of the
meeting day on September 9, 2014 and
will be announced at the meeting and
published on the Council Web site
(https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/about/
committees/nhlbac/#agenda).
The meeting is open to the public.
Dated: August 26, 2014.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–20716 Filed 8–29–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S. C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The contract proposals and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52012-52016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20719]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2014-D-0329]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Guidance for Industry
on Fees for Human Drug Compounding Outsourcing Facilities Under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA).
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by October
2, 2014.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
[[Page 52013]]
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX: 202-395-7285, or emailed to
oirasubmission@omb.eop.gov. All comments should be identified
with the title. Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in
the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd., COLE-14526, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002, PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Guidance for Industry on Fees for Human Drug Compounding Outsourcing
Facilities Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
In the Federal Register of April 1, 2014 (79 FR 18297), FDA
announced the availability of the draft guidance for industry entitled
``Fees for Human Drug Compounding Outsourcing Facilities Under Sections
503B and 744K of the FD&C Act.'' On November 27, 2013, President Obama
signed the Drug Quality and Security Act (DQSA) (Pub. L. 113-54) into
law. The DQSA added a new section 503B to the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 353B)
that created a category of entities called ``outsourcing facilities.''
Outsourcing facilities, as defined in section 503B(d)(4) of the FD&C
Act, are facilities that meet certain requirements described in section
503B, including, registering with FDA as an outsourcing facility and
paying associated fees. Drug products compounded in an outsourcing
facility can qualify for exemptions from the FDA approval requirements
in section 505 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355) and the requirement to
label products with adequate directions for use under section 502(f)(1)
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)) if the requirements in section
503B of the FD&C Act are met.
This guidance describes in detail the fee types and amounts an
entity must pay to satisfy the fee requirements of sections 503B and
744K of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 379j-62) to be deemed an outsourcing
facility and maintain its status as an outsourcing facility, the
adjustments to the fees required by law, how to qualify as a small
business to obtain a reduction of the annual establishment fee, how and
when to submit payment to FDA, the effect of failure to pay fees, and
fee-related dispute resolution.
In response to the April 1, 2014, Federal Register notice, FDA
received one comment on the draft guidance, which raised several issues
pertaining to the information collection provisions in the draft
guidance. These issues are discussed below.
(Issue 1) The comment asserted that placement of facilities on a
list of registered outsourcing facilities in fiscal year (FY) 2014
(before any registered outsourcing facilities had paid the required
establishment fee) is contrary to the language of the DQSA, because
those entities had not yet paid the requisite establishment fee and,
therefore, could not qualify as outsourcing facilities. The comment
recommended that FDA interpret the DQSA to require that a facility be
required to pay the establishment fee in full to be deemed a
``registered outsourcing facility.''
(Response) As the comment points out, section 744K(g)(3)(A) of the
FD&C Act provides that ``[a]n outsourcing facility shall not be
considered registered under section 503B(b) in a fiscal year until the
date that the outsourcing facility remits the establishment fee under
this subsection for such fiscal year.'' Section 744K(a)(1), however,
provides that ``[f]or fiscal year 2015 and each subsequent fiscal year,
the Secretary shall, in accordance with this subsection, assess and
collect--(A) an annual establishment fee from each outsourcing
facility.'' The plain language of the statute makes clear that FDA is
not to assess and collect the annual establishment fee for human drug
outsourcing facilities until FY 2015. Because the fee provisions of the
DQSA, under section 744K, do not become effective until FY 2015, no
fees are due in 2014, and payment of the establishment fee is not a
prerequisite to registration in FY 2014. Therefore, failure to pay a
fee was not a bar to registration as an outsourcing facility or to FDA
placing such facilities on its list of registered outsourcing
facilities on its Web site in FY 2014. Accordingly, FDA will not revise
the proposed guidance to reflect the points addressed in the comment on
issue one.
(Issue 2) The comment expressed concern regarding FDA's estimation
in the notice accompanying the guidance that only 20 of the current (at
the time the notice was published) 43 facilities that registered in FY
2014 will pay the required establishment fee and be deemed registered
outsourcing facilities for FY 2015.
(Response) FDA's estimates at the time the guidance was published,
just a few months after the legislation was enacted, were its best
estimates of how many firms were likely to register as outsourcing
facilities. Registration as an outsourcing facility is a voluntary
process, and FDA cannot predict with any certainty how many firms will
register. As of July 18, 2014, 51 firms were registered. However, since
registration began in December 2013, some firms have registered and
then de-registered. Estimates of how many facilities will register in
FY 2015 and beyond when establishment fees take effect are highly
uncertain. Thus, for purposes of calculating the information collection
burden in the final guidance, in tables 1-3, FDA is estimating that
approximately 50 outsourcing facilities will register and pay
establishment fees, and we have adjusted the other estimates (except
for the ``Average Burden per Response'') accordingly.
(Issue 3) The comment noted that FDA failed to correlate the
deadline to submit a request for a small business fee reduction with
the deadline to comment on the small business reduction program in
general. The comment noted that the deadline to submit a request for a
small business reduction preceded the deadline for submitting comments
to the public docket on the draft guidance. The comment suggested that
this failure preempted stakeholders from submitting comments on the
small business reduction program prior to the deadline for submitting
their request to receive the small business reduction. The commenter
expressed concern that FDA is not soliciting adequate input from
interested parties. The commenter recommended that FDA provide more
opportunities for stakeholder input. Moreover, the comment suggested
that FDA extend the deadline for submitting small business reduction
requests to such time as FDA has reviewed all comments.
(Response) FDA notes that section 744K(c)(4)(B) states that ``[t]o
qualify for the exception under this paragraph, a small business shall
submit to the Secretary a written request for such exception . . . to
the Secretary not later than April 30 of such immediately preceding
fiscal year.'' The annual April 30 deadline for requesting a small
business reduction is not a creation of FDA and the draft guidance; it
is a statutory requirement mandated by Congress. FDA cannot to revise
the deadline enacted by Congress. Accordingly, FDA will not revise the
draft guidance to permit entities to submit FY 2015 small business
reduction requests after April 30, 2014. In addition, notwithstanding
the fact that the deadline to submit a small business reduction request
preceded the deadline to submit comments on the draft guidance, the
public had a full and meaningful opportunity to submit
[[Page 52014]]
comments on the draft guidance. The draft guidance was made available
on April 1, 2014, and the period to provide comments lasted 60 days,
closing on June 2, 2014. FDA reviewed all comments submitted and
considered each of them carefully. Having considered all comments
received, FDA will not revise the draft guidance in response to
comments on Issue 3. Furthermore, FDA has recently held a series of
meetings with stakeholders to hear their views and concerns on any
aspects of FDA's implementation of the DQSA they wanted to discuss.
Over 40 organizations participated, including the commenter, and there
was a robust discussion of the issues and concerns associated with many
aspects of the implementation effort. FDA will consider the input
provided during these meetings as it moves forward to implement the
DQSA.
(Issue 4) The comment noted that FDA has not provided adequate
guidance on the standards to which section 503B and 503A facilities
will be held. This lack of guidance, the comment argues, creates
uncertainty and confusion in the compounding industry about standards
of practice expected by FDA. The comment further noted that
notwithstanding the lack of guidance and the confusion within the
industry, FDA has not provided an opportunity for facilities to decline
to operate as outsourcing facilities under section 503B and instead
identify themselves as section 503A pharmacies. Instead, the comment
notes, FDA has dictated that all of these facilities will be deemed in
violation of the new drug requirements of the FD&C Act and in
possession of misbranded drugs until they pay the establishment fee.
The comment recommends that FDA outline a clear process for outsourcing
facilities interested in withdrawing their section 503B registration
packets and instead identifying and operating as section 503A regulated
pharmacies.
(Response) FDA notes that the comments focus primarily on matters
not covered by the draft guidance, i.e., the standards for satisfying
the conditions necessary to qualify for the exemptions under sections
503A and 503B of the FD&C Act. These standards will be addressed in
other guidance and regulations, such as the recently issued final
guidance entitled ``Pharmacy Compounding of Human Drug Products Under
Section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,'' (79 FR
37742, July 2, 2014) and the draft guidance entitled, ``Current Good
Manufacturing Practice--Interim Guidance for Human Drug Compounding
Outsourcing Facilities Under Section 503B of the FD&C Act.'' (79 FR
37743, July 2, 2014). Because the draft fees guidance does not discuss
the substantive provisions of section 503A or 503B of the FD&C Act--
focusing instead on sections 744J (21 U.S.C. 379j-61) and 744K of the
FD&C Act--the response to this issue cannot be addressed in the context
of this draft guidance. Accordingly, FDA will not incorporate the
recommendations suggested in the comments on this issue into the final
version of this draft guidance.
With regard to providing a process for registered outsourcing
facilities to de-register and identify themselves as section 503A
pharmacies, the final guidance describes how a registered outsourcing
facility can de-register. With regard to the substantive effect of de-
registering, the law, the guidance, and information on FDA's Web site
make it clear that a facility has three choices: (1) Comply with the
FDA approval requirements in section 505 of the FD&C Act, the
requirement to label products with adequate directions for use under
section 502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, and the requirements for current
good manufacturing practices under section 501(a)(2)(B)) of the FD&C
Act; (2) meet the conditions to qualify for the exemptions from these
three requirements by meeting the conditions to qualify for the
exemptions under section 503A of the FD&C Act; or (3) register as an
outsourcing facility and meet the conditions under section 503B of the
FD&C Act to qualify for the exemptions from the FDA approval
requirements and adequate directions for use. A firm's compliance
status will be determined by whether they have registered as an
outsourcing facility and are meeting the conditions of section 503B
(including payment of the required fee if they register on or after
October 1, 2014), or if they have not registered, whether they are
meeting the conditions of section 503A of the FD&C Act. If they are not
meeting the conditions necessary to qualify for the exemptions under
either section 503A or 503B, they may be held to be in violation of any
applicable provisions of the FD&C Act.
Burden estimates: As discussed previously, the guidance pertains to
entities that compound human drugs and elect to register as outsourcing
facilities. These outsourcing facilities must pay certain fees to FDA.
The guidance describes the fee types and amounts, the adjustments to
fees required by law, how to submit payment, the effect of failure to
pay fees, and how to qualify as a small business to obtain a reduction
of the annual establishment fee. The guidance contains the following
collections of information:
As described in section III.A of the guidance, upon receiving
registration information from a facility seeking to register as an
outsourcing facility, FDA will send an invoice for an establishment fee
to the outsourcing facility. The invoice contains instructions for
paying the establishment fee, as discussed in section III.E of the
guidance. This process would be repeated annually under the timeframes
described in the guidance. An outsourcing facility is not considered
registered until the required establishment fee is paid for that fiscal
year.
We estimate that annually a total of 50 outsourcing facilities
(``No. of Respondents'' in table 1, row 1) will pay to FDA 50
establishment fees (``Total Annual Responses'' in table 1, row 1) as
described in the guidance. We also estimate that it will take an
outsourcing facility 0.50 hours to prepare and submit to FDA each
establishment fee (``Average Burden per Response'' in table 1, row 1).
As described in section III.C of the guidance, outsourcing
facilities that are reinspected will be assessed a reinspection fee for
each reinspection. The reinspection fee is designed to reimburse FDA
when it must visit a particular outsourcing facility more than once
because of noncompliance identified during a previous inspection. A
reinspection fee will be incurred for each reinspection that occurs.
After FDA conducts a reinspection, we will send an invoice to the email
address indicated in the facility's registration file. The invoice
contains instructions for paying the reinspection fee, as discussed in
section III.E of the guidance.
We estimate that annually a total of 15 outsourcing facilities
(``No. of Respondents'' in table 2, row 1) will pay to FDA 15
reinspection fees (``Total Annual Responses'' in table 2, row 1) as
described in the guidance. We also estimate that it will take an
outsourcing facility 0.50 hours to prepare and submit to FDA each
reinspection fee (``Average Burden per Response'' in table 2, row 1).
As described in section III.D of the guidance, certain outsourcing
facilities may qualify for a small business reduction in the amount of
the annual establishment fee. To qualify for this reduction, an
outsourcing facility must submit to FDA a written request certifying
that the entity meets the requirements for the reduction. For every
fiscal year that the firm seeks to
[[Page 52015]]
qualify as a small business and receive the fee reduction, the written
request must be submitted to FDA by April 30 of the preceding the
fiscal year. For example, an outsourcing facility must submit a written
request for the small business reduction by April 30, 2015, to qualify
for a reduction in the FY 2016 annual establishment fee. As described
in the guidance, section 744K of the FD&C Act also requires an
outsourcing facility to submit its written request for a small business
reduction in a format specified by FDA in the guidance. The guidance
specifies that Form FDA 3908 is the format for submitting requests for
a small business fee reduction.
We estimate that annually a total of 15 outsourcing facilities
(``No. of Respondents'' in table 1, row 2) will submit to FDA a request
for a small business reduction in the amount of the annual
establishment fee. We estimate that 15 outsourcing facilities will
submit Form FDA 3908 (``Total Annual Responses'' in table 1, row 2) to
FDA annually, as described in the guidance, and that it will take an
outsourcing facility 25 hours to prepare and submit to FDA each Form
FDA 3908 (``Average Burden per Response'' in table 1, row 2).
As described in section III.D of the guidance, those outsourcing
facilities that request a small business reduction in the amount of the
annual establishment fee will receive a small business designation
letter notifying the facility of FDA's decision. Outsourcing facilities
eligible to pay a reduced fee should maintain a copy of the small
business designation letter applicable to that fiscal year for their
records.
We estimate that annually a total of 15 outsourcing facilities
(``No. of Recordkeepers'' in table 3) will keep a copy of their small
business designation letter (``Total Annual Records'' in table 3), and
that maintaining each record will take 0.5 hours (``Average Burden Per
Recordkeeping'' in table 3).
As described in section V.B of the guidance, an outsourcing
facility may request a reconsideration under 21 CFR 10.75 of an FDA
decision related to the fee provisions of section 744K of the FD&C Act.
As explained in the guidance, the request should state the facility's
rationale for its position that the decision was in error and include
any additional information that is relevant to the outsourcing
facility's argument.
We estimate that a total of 6 outsourcing facilities (``No. of
Respondents'' in table 2, row 2) annually will submit to FDA a request
for reconsideration as described in the guidance. We estimate that it
will take an outsourcing facility 1 hour to prepare and submit to FDA
each request for reconsideration (``Average Burden Per Response'' in
table 2, row 2).
As described in section V.B of the guidance, an outsourcing
facility may appeal, as set forth in Sec. 10.75, an FDA denial of a
request for reconsideration of an FDA decision related to the fee
provisions of section 744K of the FD&C Act.
We estimate that a total of 3 outsourcing facilities (``No. of
Respondents'' in table 2, row 3) annually will submit an appeal of an
FDA denial of a request for reconsideration. We estimate that it will
take an outsourcing facility 1 hour to prepare and submit each appeal
under Sec. 10.75 (``Average Burden Per Response'' in table 2, row 3).
The estimated reporting and recordkeeping burdens for this
collection of information are as follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden--Establishment Fee \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Type of reporting Number of responses per Total annual Average burden Total hours
respondents respondent responses per response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payment of annual 50 1 50 0.5 (30 min.).... 25
establishment fee.
Request for small business 15 1 15 25............... 375
establishment fee reduction
(FDA Form 3908).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................... .............. .............. .............. ................. 400
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
Table 2--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden--Reinspection Fee and Dispute Resolution Requests \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Type of reporting Number of responses per Total annual Average burden Total hours
respondents respondent responses per response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payment of re-inspection fee. 15 1 15 0.5 (30 min.).... 7.50
Reconsideration request...... 6 1 6 1................ 6
Appeal request............... 3 1 3 1................ 3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................... .............. .............. .............. ................. 16.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
Table 3--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Type of recordkeeping Number of records per Total annual Average burden Total hours
recordkeepers recordkeeper records per record
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copy of small business 15 1 15 0.5 (30 min.).... 7.50
designation letter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
[[Page 52016]]
Dated: August 26, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-20719 Filed 8-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P