Schedule of Fees for Consular Services, Department of State and Overseas Embassies and Consulates-Visa and Citizenship Services Fee Changes, 51247-51254 [2014-20516]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 167 / Thursday, August 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
and importers must label and package
all schedule II–V controlled substances
in accordance with 21 CFR part 1302,
the requirement to label and package all
controlled substances containing
suvorexant in accordance with 21 CFR
part 1302 would not impose a
significant economic burden upon DEAregistered manufacturers, distributors,
and importers as the infrastructure and
materials for doing so would already be
in place. Accordingly, compliance with
21 CFR part 1302 would not require
significant additional manpower, capital
investment, or recordkeeping burdens.
Because of these facts, this final rule
will not result in a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995
(2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.), the DEA has
determined and certifies pursuant to
UMRA that this action would not result
in any Federal mandate that may result
‘‘in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or
more (adjusted for inflation) in any one
year . . . .’’ Therefore, neither a Small
Government Agency Plan nor any other
action is required under provisions of
UMRA of 1995.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This action does not impose a new
collection of information requirement
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521. This action
would not impose recordkeeping or
reporting requirements on State or local
governments, individuals, businesses, or
organizations. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Congressional
Review Act (CRA)). This rule will not
result in: an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries,
Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets. However, pursuant to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
the CRA, the DEA has submitted a copy
of this final rule to both Houses of
Congress and to the Comptroller
General.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set out above, the DEA
amends 21 CFR part 1308 as follows:
PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 1308 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b),
unless otherwise noted.
2. Amend § 1308.14 by redesignating
paragraphs (c)(49) through (c)(54) as
(c)(50) through (c)(55) and adding new
paragraph (c)(49) to read as follows:
■
§ 1308.14
Schedule IV.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(49) Suvorexant
*
*
*
*
*
2223
*
Dated: August 21, 2014.
Thomas M. Harrigan,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014–20515 Filed 8–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 22
[Public Notice: 8850]
RIN 1400–AD47
Schedule of Fees for Consular
Services, Department of State and
Overseas Embassies and
Consulates—Visa and Citizenship
Services Fee Changes
Department of State.
Interim final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
immigrant visa services. Lastly, the rule
raises the application processing fee for
renunciation of U.S. citizenship and
lowers the hourly consular officer time
charge. The Department of State is
adjusting the fees in light of the findings
of a recent Cost of Service study to
ensure that the fees for consular services
better align with the costs of providing
those services.
DATES: This interim final rule becomes
effective September 6, 2014. Written
comments must be received on or before
October 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit comments to the Department by
any of the following methods:
• Visit the Regulations.gov Web site
at: https://www.regulations.gov and
search the RIN 1400–AD47or docket
number DOS–2014–0016.
• Mail (paper, disk, or CD–ROM): U.S.
Department of State, Office of the
Comptroller, Bureau of Consular Affairs
(CA/C), SA–17 8th Floor, Washington,
DC 20522–1707.
• E-Mail: fees@state.gov. You must
include the RIN (1400–AD47) in the
subject line of your message.
• All comments should include the
commenter’s name, the organization the
commenter represents, if applicable,
and the commenter’s address. If the
Department is unable to read your
comment for any reason, and cannot
contact you for clarification, the
Department may not be able to consider
your comment. After the conclusion of
the comment period, the Department
will publish a Final Rule (in which it
will address relevant comments) as
expeditiously as possible.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Celeste Scott, Special Assistant, Office
of the Comptroller, Bureau of Consular
Affairs, Department of State; phone:
202–485–6681, telefax: 202–485–6826;
Email: fees@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department of State
amends the Schedule of Fees for
Consular Services (Schedule) for certain
nonimmigrant visa application
processing fees, certain immigrant visa
application processing and special visa
services fees, and certain citizenship
services fees. More specifically, the rule
amends the application processing fees
for two categories of petition-based
nonimmigrant visas and the tiered
application processing fees for
immigrant visas. The rule also amends
the security surcharge for immigrant
visa services and the fees for certain
SUMMARY:
51247
The interim final rule makes changes
to the Schedule of Fees for Consular
Services of the Department of State’s
Bureau of Consular Affairs. The
Department sets and collects its fees
based on the concept of full cost
recovery. The Department completed its
most recent review of current consular
fees and will implement several changes
to the Schedule of Fees based on the
new fees calculated by the Cost of
Service Model (CoSM). Please note that
certain ‘‘no fee’’ consular services are
included in the Schedule of Fees so that
members of the public will be aware of
significant consular services provided
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
51248
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 167 / Thursday, August 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
by the Department at no charge to the
recipient of the service.
What is the authority for this action?
The Department of State derives the
general authority to set fees based on the
cost of the consular services it provides,
and to charge those fees, from the
general user charges statute, 31 U.S.C.
9701. See, e.g., 31 U.S.C. 9701(b)(2)(A)
(‘‘The head of each agency . . . may
prescribe regulations establishing the
charge for a service or thing of value
provided by the agency . . . based on
. . . the costs to the government.’’). As
implemented through Executive Order
10718 of June 27, 1957, 22 U.S.C. 4219
further authorizes the Department to
establish fees to be charged for official
services provided by U.S. embassies and
consulates. Other authorities allow the
Department to charge fees for consular
services, but not to determine the
amount of such fees because the amount
is statutorily determined.
Several statutes address specific fees
relating to nonimmigrant visas. For
instance, 8 U.S.C. 1351 establishes
reciprocity as the basic principle for
setting the nonimmigrant visa issuance
fee, meaning that the fee charged an
applicant from a foreign country is
based, insofar as practicable, on the
amount of visa or other similar fees
charged to U.S. nationals by that foreign
country. In addition to the reciprocity
issuance fee, Sec. 140(a) of Public Law
103–236, 108 Stat. 382, as amended,
reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1351 (note),
establishes a cost-based application
processing fee for nonimmigrant
machine readable visas (MRVs) and
border crossing cards (BCCs). See also 8
U.S.C. 1713(b). Such fees remain
available to the Department until
expended. 8 U.S.C. 1351 (note) and
1713(d). Furthermore, Sec. 501 of Public
Law 110–293, Title V, 122 Stat. 2968,
reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1351 (note),
requires the Secretary of State to collect
an additional $2 surcharge (the ‘‘HIV/
AIDS/TB/Malaria surcharge’’) on all
MRVs and BCCs as part of the
application processing fee; this
surcharge must be deposited into the
Treasury and goes to support programs
to combat HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and
malaria. Section 2 of Public Law 113–
42 imposes a temporary $1 surcharge on
the fees for MRV and BCC application
processing, to be deposited into the
general fund of the Treasury. This
provision will sunset two years after the
first date on which the increased fee is
collected and will not affect most MRV
and BCC fees paid by applicants.
Additionally, several statutes address
fees for immigrant visa processing. For
example, Sec. 636 of Public Law 104–
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
208, div. C, Title VI, 110 Stat. 3009–703,
reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1153 (note),
authorizes the Secretary of State to
collect and retain a ‘‘Diversity
Immigrant Lottery Fee.’’ Under this fee
authority, the Secretary of State may
establish and retain a fee to recover the
costs of ‘‘allocating visas’’ described in
8 U.S.C. 1153, i.e., running the diversity
visa lottery pursuant to 8 U.S.C.
1154(a)(1)(I), and to recover the costs of
‘‘processing applications’’ for diversity
immigrant visas submitted by selectees
of the lottery. Accordingly, the
‘‘diversity visa lottery fee,’’ charged to
those persons selected by the lottery
who subsequently apply for a diversity
immigrant visa, incorporates all the
costs to the Department of administering
the diversity visa lottery program and
processing the resulting diversity
immigrant visa applications.
Another statute authorizes the
Department to collect and retain a
surcharge on immigrant visas to help
pay for efforts to enhance border
security. See 8 U.S.C. 1714. Although
this immigrant visa surcharge was
originally frozen statutorily at $45,
subsequent legislation authorized the
Department to amend this surcharge
administratively, provided the resulting
surcharge is ‘‘reasonably related to the
costs of providing services in
connection with the activity or item for
which the surcharges are charged.’’
Public Law 109–472, Sec. 6, 120 Stat.
3554, reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1714
(note).
Certain people are exempted by law
or regulation from paying specific fees
or are expressly made subject to special
fee charges by law. These are noted in
the text below. They include, for
instance, several exemptions from the
nonimmigrant visa application
processing fee for certain individuals
who engage in charitable activities or
who qualify for diplomatic visas. See 8
U.S.C. 1351; 22 CFR 41.107(c). Certain
Iraqi and Afghan nationals are similarly
exempt from paying an immigrant visa
application processing fee. See Public
Law 110–181, div. A, Title XII, Sec.
1244(d), 122 Stat. 3, reproduced at 8
U.S.C. 1157 (note); Public Law 111–8,
div. F, Title VI, Sec. 602(b)(4), 123 Stat.
524, reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1101 (note).
Although the funds collected for
many consular fees must be deposited
into the general fund of the Treasury
pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3302(b), various
statutes permit the Department to retain
some or all of the fee revenue it collects.
The Department retains the following
relevant fees: (1) The MRV and BCC
fees, see Public Law 103–236, Title I,
Sec. 140(a)(2), 112 Stat. 2681–50,
reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1351 (note) and
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8 U.S.C. 1713(d); (2) the immigrant visa
and passport security surcharges, see 8
U.S.C. 1714; (3) the diversity visa lottery
fee, see Public Law 104–208, div. C,
Title VI, Sec. 636, reproduced at 8
U.S.C. 1153 (note); (4) the fee for an
affidavit of support, see Public Law
106–113, div. A, Title II, Sec. 232(a),
113 Stat. 1501, reproduced at 8 U.S.C.
1183a (note); and (5) the fee to process
requests from participants in the
Department’s Exchange Visitor Program
for a waiver of the two-year homeresidence requirement, see 22 U.S.C.
1475e. The Department also has
available one-third of the total annual
revenue collected from fraud prevention
and detection fees charged in relation to
H- and L-category visas, See 8 U.S.C.
1184(c)(12), 1356(v)(2)(A).
The Department last changed
nonimmigrant and immigrant visa fees
in an interim final rule dated March 29,
2012. See Department of State Schedule
of Fees for Consular Services,
Department of State and Overseas
Embassies and Consulates, 22 CFR part
22 (77 FR 18907). Those changes to the
Schedule went into effect April 13,
2012. The final rule regarding those fees
was published on September 17, 2012
(77 FR 57012).
The Department last changed fees for
passport and citizenship services and
overseas citizens’ services in an interim
final rule dated June 28, 2010. See
Department of State Schedule of Fees
for Consular Services, Department of
State and Overseas Embassies and
Consulates, 22 CFR Part 22 (75 FR
36522). Those changes to the Schedule
went into effect July 13, 2010. A final
rule regarding those fees was published
on February 2, 2012 (77 FR 5177).
Some fees in the Schedule, including
Items 20(a) and (b), 31(a) and (b) and
35(c), are set by the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS). These DHS
fees were most recently updated by that
agency on November 23, 2010, and are
subject to change in the future. See 75
FR 58962. The Department lists these
DHS fees in the Department Schedule of
Fees for cashiering purposes only. The
Department has no authority to set DHS
fees, which are listed at 8 CFR
103.7(b)(1).
Why is the Department adjusting
certain nonimmigrant visa, immigrant
visa, citizens services and
administrative services fees at this
time?
Consistent with OMB Circular A–25
guidelines, the Department recently
completed a fee review using its
activity-based Cost of Service Model.
This review was conducted from April
2012 through July 2013 and provides
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 167 / Thursday, August 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
the basis for updating the Schedule. The
results of that review are outlined in
this rule.1
Similar to the 2011 fee review, upon
which the current Schedule is based,
costs are generated by an activity-based
cost model that takes into account all
costs to the U.S. government. Unlike a
typical accounting system, which
accounts for only traditional generalledger-type costs such as salaries,
supplies, travel and other business
expenses, activity-based cost models
measure the costs of activities, or
processes, and then provide an
additional view of costs by the products
and services produced by an
organization through the identification
of the key cost drivers of the activities.
Below is a description of Activity-Based
Costing excerpted from the
Supplemental Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking published on March 24,
2010 (75 FR 14111).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Activity-Based Costing Generally
OMB Circular A–25 states that it is
the objective of the United States
Government to ‘‘(a) ensure that each
service, sale, or use of Government
goods or resources provided by an
agency to specific recipients be selfsustaining; [and] (b) promote efficient
allocation of the Nation’s resources by
establishing charges for special benefits
provided to the recipient that are at least
as great as costs to the Government of
providing the special benefits . . . .’’
OMB Circular A–25, 5(a)–(b); see also 31
U.S.C. 9701(b)(2)(A) (agency ‘‘may
prescribe regulations establishing the
charge for a service or thing of value
provided by the agency . . . based on
. . . the costs to the Government . . .
.’’). To set prices that are ‘‘selfsustaining,’’ the Department must
determine the full cost of providing
consular services. Following guidance
provided in Statement 4 of OMB’s
Statement of Federal Financial
Accounting Standards (SFFAS),
available at https://www.fasab.gov/
pdffiles/sffas-4.pdf, the Department
chose to develop and use an activitybased costing (ABC) model to determine
the full cost of the services listed in its
Schedule of Fees, both those whose fee
the Department proposes to change, as
well as those whose fee will remain
unchanged from prior years. The
Department refers to the specific ABC
model that underpins the proposed fees
as the ‘‘Cost of Service Model’’ or
‘‘CoSM.’’
1 To request more information about the Cost of
Service model, please send your request using one
of the methods in the Address section above.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
The Government Accountability
Office (GAO) defines activity-based
costing as a ‘‘set of accounting methods
used to identify and describe costs and
required resources for activities within
processes.’’ Because an organization can
use the same staff and resources
(computer equipment, production
facilities, etc.) to produce multiple
products or services, ABC models seek
to precisely identify and assign costs to
processes and activities and then to
individual products and services
through the identification of key cost
drivers referred to as ‘‘resource drivers’’
and ‘‘activity drivers.’’
Example: Imagine a government agency
that has a single facility it uses to prepare
and issue a single product—a driver’s
license. In this simple scenario, every cost
associated with that facility (the salaries of
employees, the electricity to power the
computer terminals, the cost of a blank
driver’s license, etc.) can be attributed
directly to the cost of producing that single
item. If that agency wants to ensure that it
is charging a ‘‘self-sustaining’’ price for
driver’s licenses, it only has to divide its total
costs for a given time period by an estimate
of the number of driver’s licenses to be
produced during that same time period.
However, if that agency issues
multiple products (driver’s licenses,
non-driver ID cards, etc.), has
employees that work on other activities
besides licenses (for example, accepting
payment for traffic tickets), and operates
out of multiple facilities it shares with
other agencies, it becomes much more
complex for the agency to determine
exactly how much it costs to produce
any single product. In those instances,
the agency would need to know what
percent of time its employees spend on
each service and how much of its
overhead (rent, utilities, facilities
maintenance, etc.) can be allocated to
the delivery of each service to determine
the cost of producing each of its various
products—the driver’s license, the nondriver ID card, etc. Using an ABC model
would allow the agency to develop
those costs.
Components of Activity-Based Costing
As noted in SFFAS Statement 4,
‘‘activity-based costing has gained broad
acceptance by manufacturing and
service industries as an effective
managerial tool’’ (SSFAS Statement 4,
147). There are no ‘‘off-the-shelf’’ ABC
models that allow the Department (or
any other entity) to simply populate a
few data points and generate an answer.
ABC models require financial and
accounting analysis and modeling skills
combined with a detailed understanding
of all the organization’s business
processes, which, in an entity the size
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51249
of the Department’s Bureau of Consular
Affairs, are exceedingly complex. More
specifically, ABC models require an
organization to:
• Identify all of the activities that are
required to produce a particular product
or service (‘‘activities’’);
• Identify all of the resources
allocated to the production of (costs)
that product or service (‘‘resources’’);
• Measure the quantity of resources
consumed (‘‘resource driver’’); and
• Measure the frequency and
intensity of demand placed on activities
to produce services (‘‘activity driver’’).
For additional details on an activitybased cost model, see the Supplemental
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
published on March 24, 2010 (75 FR
14111).
Although much of the modeling
methodology has remained the same
between fee reviews, the methodology
for capturing Department historical
support costs and projected costs has
been updated to reflect the change in
the Department’s workload. In order to
accurately account for the costs
associated with rapidly growing
demand for nonimmigrant visas in
locations such as China and Brazil, the
current fee review also incorporates two
years of projected costs in addition to
two years of historical costs and one
year of current costs. The new fees
represent a weighted average of the
annual costs by service for fiscal years
2010–2014. Costs for individual fiscal
years were weighted by the projected
workload volume for that year. These
weighted costs by fiscal year were then
added together to generate a single cost
per service upon which the fees are
determined.
The CoSM update included a new
Overseas Time Survey, conducted in
June 2012, which collected extensive
data on both consular activities and the
time spent by consular staff performing
consular services at all overseas
locations. Costs related to compensation
for consular staff were then assigned to
service categories based on the amount
of time spent performing them.
Therefore, the results of the Overseas
Time Survey impacted costs for certain
consular services identified below.
Nonimmigrant Visa Application and
Border Crossing Card Processing Fees
The Department has determined,
based on the CoSM, that the costs to the
Department to accept, adjudicate, and
issue each of the different MRV
categories varies. The effort related to
some categories such as petition-based
MRVs is appreciably higher than the
standard, non-petition-based MRV
application. Each of those petition-
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
51250
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 167 / Thursday, August 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
based nonimmigrant visa categories
requires a review of extensive
documentation and a more in-depth
applicant interview than other
categories of MRVs. After thorough
review through the CoSM, including
updated consular processing time data
from the Overseas Time Survey, the fee
for processing E (treaty trader and treaty
investor) visa applications will decrease
from $270 to $205, and the fee for
´
processing K (fiance and certain spouses
of U.S. citizens) visa applications will
increase from $240 to $265.
The Department rounded these fees to
the nearest $5 for the ease of converting
to foreign currencies, which are most
often used to pay the fee. These fees also
include the statutory $2 HIV/AIDS/TB/
Malaria surcharge and the $1 special
immigrant program surcharge which
must be attached to every MRV fee.
Please note that in June 2013, the
authority to charge the $1 surcharge
mandated by section 239 of Public Law
110–457, Title II, 122 Stat. 5044,
reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1351 (note)
lapsed, and the HIV/AIDS/TB/Malaria
surcharge increased from $1 to $2 as
mandated by Congress. See Public Law
110–293, Title V, Sec. 501, 122 Stat.
2968, reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1351
(note). Because those changes occurred
simultaneously, nonimmigrant visa fees
were not affected.
Section 2 of Public Law 113–42, 127
Stat. 552, reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1351
(note), imposes a temporary $1
surcharge on the fees for MRV and BCC
application processing, to be deposited
into the general fund of the Treasury.
This provision will sunset two years
after the first date on which the
increased fee is collected. The addition
of the new $1 special immigrant
program surcharge also does not affect
most nonimmigrant visa fees. As the
Department rounded these fees to the
nearest $5 for the ease of converting
foreign currencies, as noted above, the
addition of this surcharge will not affect
most MRV and BCC fees paid by
applicants. The exception is the
processing fee for BCC applications by
minors under the age of 15, which is
statutorily set at $13. The addition of
the $1 special immigrant program
surcharge to the $13 fee and $2 HIV/
AIDS/TB/Malaria surcharge will
increase the total fee for this service
from $15 to $16.
Immigrant Visa Application Processing
Fees
In addition to the nonimmigrant visa
application processing fee modifications
referenced above, the Department is
adjusting the four-tiered immigrant visa
application processing fees based on the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
CoSM calculation for each discrete
category of immigrant visa, as
applications for certain categories cost
more to process than others.
Accordingly, the application processing
fee for a Family-Based Visa (immediate
relative and family preference,
processed on the basis of an approved
I–130, I–600 or I–800 petition) will
increase from $230 to $325. The
application processing fee for an
Employment-Based Visa (processed on
the basis of an approved I–140 alien
worker or I–526 alien entrepreneur
petition) will decrease from $405 to
$345. Other Immigrant Visa applications
(including for I–360 self-petitioners,
special immigrant visa applicants and
all others) will have an application
processing fee of $205, down from $220.
As noted above, certain qualifying Iraqi
and Afghan Special Immigrant Visa
applicants are statutorily exempt from
paying any visa-related fees. Public Law
110–181, div. A, Title XII, Sec. 1244(d),
reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1157 (note);
Public Law 111–8, div. F, Title VI, Sec.
602(b)(4), reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1101
(note).
Immigrant Visa Security Surcharge
The Department is increasing the
Immigrant Visa Security Surcharge,
which is applicable to all applicants
except those persons who are statutorily
exempted from paying fees, from $75 to
$100. The Immigrant Visa Security
Surcharge comprises those costs
associated with the immigrant visa
application processing fee that support
enhanced border security. In this
update, new data regarding time spent
by consular officials related to enhanced
border security in processing immigrant
visa applications, derived from the 2012
Overseas Time Survey, resulted in an
increase to this cost. See 8 U.S.C. 1714
and Public Law 109–472, Sec. 6, 120
Stat. 3554, reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1714
(note). See also the Supplemental Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (75 FR 14111)
for general details regarding the
inclusion of Overseas Time Survey data
into the Cost of Service Study. Please
note that as of 2012, the Immigrant Visa
Security Surcharge is embedded in the
aforementioned immigrant visa
application processing fee and is not
charged as a standalone fee or set forth
as a separate fee on the Schedule.
Determining Returning Resident Status
A permanent resident (called lawful
permanent resident or LPR) or
conditional resident (CR) who has
remained outside the United States for
one year, or beyond the validity period
of a Re-entry Permit, requires a new
immigrant visa to enter the United
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
States and resume permanent residence.
A provision exists under U.S. visa law
for the issuance of a returning resident
special immigrant visa to an LPR who
remained outside the United States due
to circumstances beyond his or her
control. Processing those applications
for determination of eligibility as a
returning resident has become less
costly due to continuing advances in
automation, making it easier to verify
previous U.S. immigration status.
Accordingly, the Department will lower
the fee from $275 to $180.
Waiver of Two-Year Residency
Requirement
8 U.S.C. 1182, i.e., Educational Visitor
Status; Foreign Residence Requirement;
Waiver describes in detail certain
categories of exchange visitors (J–1) that
are subject to a two-year home-country
physical presence requirement. This
requires that the exchange visitor return
to the country of his or her nationality
or his or her last residence for at least
two years following participation in
particular exchange visitor programs
before adjusting status in the United
States or applying for certain visas to
travel to the United States. This twoyear residency requirement may be
waived in certain circumstances. The
Department charges a fee for processing
waiver applications. In accordance with
the results of the CoSM, in which an
updated analysis of time spent
performing this activity indicated a
reduced percentage of resources
dedicated to this activity, the
Department is decreasing the fee for
processing an application for this
waiver from $215 to $120.
Affidavit of Support Review
The Department charges the affidavit
of support review fee for all affidavits of
support reviewed at the National Visa
Center in connection with an
application for a family-based
immigrant visa. The purpose of the
review is to ensure that each affidavit is
properly completed before the National
Visa Center forwards it to a consular
post for adjudication. The Department is
increasing the fee from $88 to $120 to
reflect the increase in the cost of
providing this service, as determined by
the CoSM, including updated analysis
of time spent performing this activity.
Documentation for Renunciation of
Citizenship
The CoSM demonstrated that
documenting a U.S. citizen’s
renunciation of citizenship is extremely
costly, requiring American consular
officers overseas to spend substantial
amounts of time to accept, process, and
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
51251
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 167 / Thursday, August 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
adjudicate cases. For example, consular
officers must confirm that the potential
renunciant fully understands the
consequences of renunciation, including
losing the right to reside in the United
States without documentation as an
alien. Other steps include verifying that
the renunciant is a U.S. citizen,
conducting a minimum of two intensive
interviews with the potential
renunciant, and reviewing at least three
consular systems before administering
the oath of renunciation. The final
approval of the loss of nationality must
be done by law within the Directorate of
Overseas Citizens Services in
Washington, DC, after which the case is
returned to the consular officer overseas
for final delivery of the Certificate of
Loss of Nationality to the renunciant.
These steps further add to the time and
labor that must be involved in the
process. Accordingly, the Department is
increasing the fee for processing such
requests from $450 to $2,350. As noted
in the interim final rule dated June 28,
2010 (77 FR 36522), the fee of $450 was
set substantially below the cost to the
U.S. government of providing this
service (less than one quarter of the
cost). Since that time, demand for the
service has increased dramatically,
consuming far more consular officer
time and resources, as reflected in the
2012 Overseas Time Survey and
increased workload data. Because the
Department believes there is no public
benefit or other reason for setting this
fee below cost, the Department is
increasing this fee to reflect the full cost
of providing the service. Therefore the
increased fee reflects both the increased
cost of the provision of service as well
as the determination to now charge the
full cost.
Consular Time Charges
The Department previously charged a
consular time fee of $231 per hour, per
employee. This fee is charged when
indicated on the Schedule of Fees or
when services are performed away from
the office or outside regular business
hours. The CoSM estimated that the
hourly consular time charge is now
lower. Accordingly, the Department is
lowering this fee to $135 per hour.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Item No.
Proposed
fee
When will the Department of State
implement this interim final rule?
The Department intends to implement
this interim final rule, and initiate
collection of the fees set forth herein,
effective 15 days after publication of
this rule in the Federal Register.
Regulatory Findings
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department is publishing this
rule as an interim final rule, with a 60day provision for post-promulgation
comments and with an effective date
less than 30 days from the date of
publication, based on the ‘‘good cause’’
exceptions set forth at 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B) and 553(d)(3). Delaying
implementation of this rule would be
contrary to the public interest because
the fees in this rule fund consular
services that are critical to national
security, including screening visa
applicants.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department has reviewed this
rule and, by approving it, certifies that
it will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601(6).
This rule decreases the application
processing fees for employer-sponsored
petition-based immigrant visas. The
issuance of these visas is contingent
upon approval by DHS of a petition
filed by a United States company with
DHS, and these companies pay a
petition fee to DHS to cover the
processing of the petition. The visa itself
is sought and paid for by an individual
foreign national overseas who seeks to
come to the United States. The amount
of the petition fees that are paid by
small entities to DHS is not, in any way,
connected to or controlled by the
amount of the visa fees paid by
individuals to the Department of State.
While small entities may cover or
reimburse employees for application
processing fees, the State Department is
unaware of the number of such entities
that do so as it, again, is not a process
controlled by the State Department. The
workload volume in this category
accounts for only four percent of the
total immigrant workload expected in
Unit
cost
Current
fee
Change
in fee
FY 2014. The $60 decrease in the
application processing fee for these
immigrant visas will likely have a
positive, albeit insignificant, economic
impact on the small entities that choose
to reimburse the applicant for the visa
fee. Therefore the State Department
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year, and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995, 2 U.S.C. 1501–1504.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
The Department has reviewed this
rule to ensure its consistency with the
regulatory philosophy and principles set
forth in the Executive Orders. This rule
has been submitted to OMB for review.
This rule is necessary in light of the
Department of State’s CoSM finding that
the cost of processing various categories
of nonimmigrant and immigrant visas
and of providing certain overseas
citizens services has changed since
those fees were last amended in 2012
and 2010, respectively. The Department
is setting the new fees in accordance
with 31 U.S.C. 9701 and other
applicable legal authority, as described
in detail above. See, e.g., 31 U.S.C.
9701(b)(2)(A) (‘‘The head of each agency
. . . may prescribe regulations
establishing the charge for a service or
thing of value provided by the agency
. . . based on . . . the costs to the
government.’’). This regulation sets the
fees for consular services at the amount
required to recover the costs associated
with providing that service.
Details of the fee changes are as
follows:
Percentage
increase
Estimated
annual
number of
applications 1
Estimated
change in
annual
fees
collected 2
SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR CONSULAR SERVICES
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
17:34 Aug 27, 2014
*
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
*
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
*
28AUR1
*
51252
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 167 / Thursday, August 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Item No.
Proposed
fee
Unit
cost
Current
fee
Change
in fee
Estimated
annual
number of
applications 1
Percentage
increase
Estimated
change in
annual
fees
collected 2
PASSPORT AND CITIZENSHIP SERVICES
8. Administrative Processing of Formal Renunciation of U.S.
Citizenship .................
$2,350
$2,349
$450
$1,900
422
2,378
$4,518,200
NONIMMIGRANT VISA SERVICES
21. Nonimmigrant Visa
Application and Border Crossing Card
Processing Fees (per
person):
(c) E category nonimmigrant visa ....
(d) K category nonimmigrant visa ....
(f) Border crossing
card—under age
15; for Mexican
citizens if parent
or guardian has
or is applying for
a border crossing
card (valid 10
years or until the
applicant reaches
age 15; whichever is sooner) ...
$205
$205
$270
($65)
¥24
46,901
¥$3,048,565
$265
$262
$240
$25
10
16,708
$417,700
$16
( 3)
$15
$1
7
250,000
$250,000
IMMIGRANT AND SPECIAL VISA SERVICES
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
32. Immigrant Visa Application Processing
Fee (per person)
(a) Immediate relative and family
preference applications ................
(b) Employmentbased applications ....................
(c) Other immigrant
visa applications
(including I–360
self-petitioners
and special immigrant visa applicants) ..................
34. Affidavit of Support
Review .......................
35. Special Visa Services:
(a) Determining Returning Resident
Status .................
(c) Waiver of TwoYear Residency
Requirement .......
$325
$322
$230
$95
41
575,360
$54,659,200
$345
$344
$405
($60)
¥15
26,811
¥$1,608,660
$205
$204
$220
($15)
¥7
1,559
¥$23,385
$120
$116
$88
$32
36
317,898
$10,172,736
$180
$178
$275
($95)
¥35
3,412
¥$324,140
$120
$116
$215
($95)
¥44
10,488
¥$996,360
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
75. Consular Time
Charges .....................
$135
$134
$231
($96)
¥42
134
¥$12,864
Total .......................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
$64,003,862
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:34 Aug 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
51253
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 167 / Thursday, August 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Item No.
*
Proposed
fee
Unit
cost
*
Current
fee
*
Change
in fee
*
Percentage
increase
*
Estimated
annual
number of
applications 1
*
Estimated
change in
annual
fees
collected 2
*
1 Based
on projected FY 2014 workload.
projected FY 2014 workload to generate projections.
fee for Border Crossing Card applications by minors is statutorily set.
2 Using
3 The
Historically, nonimmigrant visa
workload has increased year to year at
approximately 11 percent. The
Department anticipates that with the
current state of the global economy,
demand will be approximately 10.1
million in Fiscal Year 2014. With regard
to the economic impact as a whole, the
more than 94 percent of nonimmigrant
visa applications that are not petitionbased are sought by and paid for
entirely by foreign national applicants.
The revenue increases resulting from
those fees should not be considered to
have a direct cost impact on the
domestic economy.
With regard to immigrant visas, many
categories are numerically capped by
law; these caps limit workload and keep
current demand fairly stable. In FY
2013, the Department issued 9.1 percent
of all available immigrant visas in
Employment-Based categories (capped
at 140,000 including adjustments of
status processed domestically by DHS).
In FY 2013, all immigrant visas
available under the Diversity Visa
program were issued (capped at 50,000
including adjustments of status
processed domestically by DHS). Also
in FY 2013, the Department issued 84.9
percent of the immigrant visas available
for Family-Preference categories
(capped at 226,000 including
adjustments of status processed
domestically by DHS).
There are nearly 5.7 million
applicants currently awaiting
numerically-controlled visas, sufficient
to fill more than 12 years’ workload at
the current annual caps, and this does
not take into account applicants who
would be adjusting status in the United
States. It is reasonable to expect that the
immigrant visa workload for FY 2014
and FY 2015 will remain about the same
as FY 2013. However, please note that
these estimates do not take into account
variables that the Department cannot
predict at this time, such as legislative
changes contemplated by
Comprehensive Immigration Reform.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Sec. 6 of Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this
rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
federal programs and activities do not
apply to this regulation.
Executive Order 13175
The Department has determined that
this rulemaking will not have tribal
implications, will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments, and will not
preempt tribal law. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175
do not apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not create or revise any
reporting or record-keeping
requirements.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 22
Consular services, Fees, Passports and
visas.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in
the preamble, 22 CFR part 22 is
amended as follows:
PART 22—SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR
CONSULAR SERVICES—
DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND
FOREIGN SERVICE
1. The authority citation for part 22
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101 note, 1153 note,
1183a note, 1351, 1351 note, 1714, 1714 note;
10 U.S.C. 2602(c); 11 U.S.C. 1157 note; 22
U.S.C. 214, 214 note, 1475e, 2504(a), 4201,
4206, 4215, 4219, 6551; 31 U.S.C. 9701; Exec.
Order 10,718, 22 FR 4632 (1957); Exec. Order
11,295, 31 FR 10603 (1966).
2. Section 22.1 is amended by revising
the introductory text and items 8, 21,
32, 34, 35, and 75 in the ‘‘Schedule of
Fees for Consular Services’’ table and
removing item 36 to read as follows:
■
§ 22.1
Schedule of fees.
The following table sets forth the new
fees for the following categories listed
on the U.S. Department of State’s
Schedule of Fees for Consular Services:
SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR CONSULAR SERVICES
Item No.
Fee
PASSPORT AND CITIZENSHIP SERVICES
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
*
8. Administrative Processing of Formal Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship .............................................................................
*
*
*
*
NONIMMIGRANT VISA SERVICES
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
21. Nonimmigrant Visa Application and Border Crossing Card Processing Fees (per person):
(a) Non-petition-based nonimmigrant visa (except E category) .......................................................................................
(b) H, L, O, P, Q and R category nonimmigrant visa ......................................................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
*
$2,350
28AUR1
*
*
$160
$190
51254
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 167 / Thursday, August 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR CONSULAR SERVICES—Continued
Item No.
Fee
(c) E category nonimmigrant visa .....................................................................................................................................
´
(d) K category (fiance) nonimmigrant visa .......................................................................................................................
(e) Border crossing card—age 15 and over (10 year validity) .........................................................................................
(f) Border crossing card—under age 15; for Mexican citizens if parent or guardian has or is applying for a border
crossing card (valid 10 years or until the applicant reaches age 15, whichever is sooner).
*
*
*
*
*
IMMIGRANT AND SPECIAL VISA SERVICES
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
32. Immigrant Visa Application Processing Fee (per person)
(a) Immediate relative and family preference applications ..............................................................................................
(b) Employment-based applications .................................................................................................................................
(c) Other immigrant visa applications (including I–360 self-petitioners and special immigrant visa applicants) .............
(d) Certain Iraqi and Afghan special immigrant visa applications ....................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
34. Affidavit of Support Review (only when reviewed domestically) .......................................................................................
35. Special Visa Services:
(a) Determining Returning Resident Status .....................................................................................................................
(b) Waiver of two year residency requirement .................................................................................................................
(c) Waiver of immigrant visa ineligibility (collected for USCIS and subject to change) ...................................................
(d) Refugee or significant public benefit parole case processing ....................................................................................
(Items 36 through 40 vacant.)
*
*
*
*
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
*
*
*
Dated: August 14, 2014.
Patrick Kennedy,
Under Secretary of State for Management,
Department of State.
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Parole Commission
28 CFR Part 2
[Docket No. USPC–2013–02]
Effective August 28, 2014 and is
applicable beginning July 23, 2014.
DATES:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Paroling, Recommitting, and
Supervising Federal Prisoners:
Prisoners Serving Sentences Under
the United States and District of
Columbia Codes
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
United States Parole
Commission, Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The United States Parole
Commission is revising its rules
describing the conditions of release set
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
*
for persons on supervision and the
procedures used to impose and modify
the conditions. The revision is part of
our ongoing effort to make our rules
easier to understand for those persons
affected by the rules and other
interested persons and organizations.
We are also adding new procedures for
imposing special conditions for sex
offenders, and filling a gap left by an
earlier rule change in 2003 regarding the
administrative appeals that may be filed
by District of Columbia offenders on
supervised release.
[FR Doc. 2014–20516 Filed 8–27–14; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
*
Office of the General Counsel, U.S.
Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20530, telephone (202)
346–7030. Questions about this
publication are welcome, but inquiries
concerning individual cases cannot be
answered over the telephone.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
$325
$345
$205
NO FEE.
*
$120
$180
$120
For fee amount, see 8
CFR 103.7(b)(1).
NO FEE.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
75. Consular Time Charges: As required by this schedule and for fee services performed away from the office or during
after-duty hours (per hour or part thereof/per consular officer).
*
$205
$265
$160
$16
*
*
*
$135
*
Background
In the notice of proposed rulemaking
published at 78 FR 11998–12002 (Feb.
21, 2013), we discussed the Parole
Commission’s authority to impose
conditions of release, the purposes and
types of release conditions and the
procedures we use to impose the
conditions. We refer you to the previous
publication for a review of this
background material. In the notice of
proposed rulemaking we encouraged the
public to comment on our proposed
changes and we received a substantial
number of written comments from
interested persons and organizations.
We discuss that public comment below.
Public Comment From the District of
Columbia Public Defender Service
(PDS)
PDS recommends that the
Commission place restrictions on the
current rule allowing a supervision
officer to seize prohibited items in plain
view when conducting a visit of the
releasee’s residence or place of
employment. This rule was first
E:\FR\FM\28AUR1.SGM
28AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 167 (Thursday, August 28, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51247-51254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20516]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 22
[Public Notice: 8850]
RIN 1400-AD47
Schedule of Fees for Consular Services, Department of State and
Overseas Embassies and Consulates--Visa and Citizenship Services Fee
Changes
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State amends the Schedule of Fees for
Consular Services (Schedule) for certain nonimmigrant visa application
processing fees, certain immigrant visa application processing and
special visa services fees, and certain citizenship services fees. More
specifically, the rule amends the application processing fees for two
categories of petition-based nonimmigrant visas and the tiered
application processing fees for immigrant visas. The rule also amends
the security surcharge for immigrant visa services and the fees for
certain immigrant visa services. Lastly, the rule raises the
application processing fee for renunciation of U.S. citizenship and
lowers the hourly consular officer time charge. The Department of State
is adjusting the fees in light of the findings of a recent Cost of
Service study to ensure that the fees for consular services better
align with the costs of providing those services.
DATES: This interim final rule becomes effective September 6, 2014.
Written comments must be received on or before October 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments to the Department by
any of the following methods:
Visit the Regulations.gov Web site at: https://www.regulations.gov and search the RIN 1400-AD47or docket number DOS-
2014-0016.
Mail (paper, disk, or CD-ROM): U.S. Department of State,
Office of the Comptroller, Bureau of Consular Affairs (CA/C), SA-17 8th
Floor, Washington, DC 20522-1707.
E-Mail: fees@state.gov. You must include the RIN (1400-
AD47) in the subject line of your message.
All comments should include the commenter's name, the
organization the commenter represents, if applicable, and the
commenter's address. If the Department is unable to read your comment
for any reason, and cannot contact you for clarification, the
Department may not be able to consider your comment. After the
conclusion of the comment period, the Department will publish a Final
Rule (in which it will address relevant comments) as expeditiously as
possible.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Celeste Scott, Special Assistant,
Office of the Comptroller, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Department of
State; phone: 202-485-6681, telefax: 202-485-6826; Email:
fees@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The interim final rule makes changes to the Schedule of Fees for
Consular Services of the Department of State's Bureau of Consular
Affairs. The Department sets and collects its fees based on the concept
of full cost recovery. The Department completed its most recent review
of current consular fees and will implement several changes to the
Schedule of Fees based on the new fees calculated by the Cost of
Service Model (CoSM). Please note that certain ``no fee'' consular
services are included in the Schedule of Fees so that members of the
public will be aware of significant consular services provided
[[Page 51248]]
by the Department at no charge to the recipient of the service.
What is the authority for this action?
The Department of State derives the general authority to set fees
based on the cost of the consular services it provides, and to charge
those fees, from the general user charges statute, 31 U.S.C. 9701. See,
e.g., 31 U.S.C. 9701(b)(2)(A) (``The head of each agency . . . may
prescribe regulations establishing the charge for a service or thing of
value provided by the agency . . . based on . . . the costs to the
government.''). As implemented through Executive Order 10718 of June
27, 1957, 22 U.S.C. 4219 further authorizes the Department to establish
fees to be charged for official services provided by U.S. embassies and
consulates. Other authorities allow the Department to charge fees for
consular services, but not to determine the amount of such fees because
the amount is statutorily determined.
Several statutes address specific fees relating to nonimmigrant
visas. For instance, 8 U.S.C. 1351 establishes reciprocity as the basic
principle for setting the nonimmigrant visa issuance fee, meaning that
the fee charged an applicant from a foreign country is based, insofar
as practicable, on the amount of visa or other similar fees charged to
U.S. nationals by that foreign country. In addition to the reciprocity
issuance fee, Sec. 140(a) of Public Law 103-236, 108 Stat. 382, as
amended, reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1351 (note), establishes a cost-based
application processing fee for nonimmigrant machine readable visas
(MRVs) and border crossing cards (BCCs). See also 8 U.S.C. 1713(b).
Such fees remain available to the Department until expended. 8 U.S.C.
1351 (note) and 1713(d). Furthermore, Sec. 501 of Public Law 110-293,
Title V, 122 Stat. 2968, reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1351 (note), requires
the Secretary of State to collect an additional $2 surcharge (the
``HIV/AIDS/TB/Malaria surcharge'') on all MRVs and BCCs as part of the
application processing fee; this surcharge must be deposited into the
Treasury and goes to support programs to combat HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis,
and malaria. Section 2 of Public Law 113-42 imposes a temporary $1
surcharge on the fees for MRV and BCC application processing, to be
deposited into the general fund of the Treasury. This provision will
sunset two years after the first date on which the increased fee is
collected and will not affect most MRV and BCC fees paid by applicants.
Additionally, several statutes address fees for immigrant visa
processing. For example, Sec. 636 of Public Law 104-208, div. C, Title
VI, 110 Stat. 3009-703, reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1153 (note), authorizes
the Secretary of State to collect and retain a ``Diversity Immigrant
Lottery Fee.'' Under this fee authority, the Secretary of State may
establish and retain a fee to recover the costs of ``allocating visas''
described in 8 U.S.C. 1153, i.e., running the diversity visa lottery
pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1154(a)(1)(I), and to recover the costs of
``processing applications'' for diversity immigrant visas submitted by
selectees of the lottery. Accordingly, the ``diversity visa lottery
fee,'' charged to those persons selected by the lottery who
subsequently apply for a diversity immigrant visa, incorporates all the
costs to the Department of administering the diversity visa lottery
program and processing the resulting diversity immigrant visa
applications.
Another statute authorizes the Department to collect and retain a
surcharge on immigrant visas to help pay for efforts to enhance border
security. See 8 U.S.C. 1714. Although this immigrant visa surcharge was
originally frozen statutorily at $45, subsequent legislation authorized
the Department to amend this surcharge administratively, provided the
resulting surcharge is ``reasonably related to the costs of providing
services in connection with the activity or item for which the
surcharges are charged.'' Public Law 109-472, Sec. 6, 120 Stat. 3554,
reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1714 (note).
Certain people are exempted by law or regulation from paying
specific fees or are expressly made subject to special fee charges by
law. These are noted in the text below. They include, for instance,
several exemptions from the nonimmigrant visa application processing
fee for certain individuals who engage in charitable activities or who
qualify for diplomatic visas. See 8 U.S.C. 1351; 22 CFR 41.107(c).
Certain Iraqi and Afghan nationals are similarly exempt from paying an
immigrant visa application processing fee. See Public Law 110-181, div.
A, Title XII, Sec. 1244(d), 122 Stat. 3, reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1157
(note); Public Law 111-8, div. F, Title VI, Sec. 602(b)(4), 123 Stat.
524, reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1101 (note).
Although the funds collected for many consular fees must be
deposited into the general fund of the Treasury pursuant to 31 U.S.C.
3302(b), various statutes permit the Department to retain some or all
of the fee revenue it collects. The Department retains the following
relevant fees: (1) The MRV and BCC fees, see Public Law 103-236, Title
I, Sec. 140(a)(2), 112 Stat. 2681-50, reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1351
(note) and 8 U.S.C. 1713(d); (2) the immigrant visa and passport
security surcharges, see 8 U.S.C. 1714; (3) the diversity visa lottery
fee, see Public Law 104-208, div. C, Title VI, Sec. 636, reproduced at
8 U.S.C. 1153 (note); (4) the fee for an affidavit of support, see
Public Law 106-113, div. A, Title II, Sec. 232(a), 113 Stat. 1501,
reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1183a (note); and (5) the fee to process
requests from participants in the Department's Exchange Visitor Program
for a waiver of the two-year home-residence requirement, see 22 U.S.C.
1475e. The Department also has available one-third of the total annual
revenue collected from fraud prevention and detection fees charged in
relation to H- and L-category visas, See 8 U.S.C. 1184(c)(12),
1356(v)(2)(A).
The Department last changed nonimmigrant and immigrant visa fees in
an interim final rule dated March 29, 2012. See Department of State
Schedule of Fees for Consular Services, Department of State and
Overseas Embassies and Consulates, 22 CFR part 22 (77 FR 18907). Those
changes to the Schedule went into effect April 13, 2012. The final rule
regarding those fees was published on September 17, 2012 (77 FR 57012).
The Department last changed fees for passport and citizenship
services and overseas citizens' services in an interim final rule dated
June 28, 2010. See Department of State Schedule of Fees for Consular
Services, Department of State and Overseas Embassies and Consulates, 22
CFR Part 22 (75 FR 36522). Those changes to the Schedule went into
effect July 13, 2010. A final rule regarding those fees was published
on February 2, 2012 (77 FR 5177).
Some fees in the Schedule, including Items 20(a) and (b), 31(a) and
(b) and 35(c), are set by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
These DHS fees were most recently updated by that agency on November
23, 2010, and are subject to change in the future. See 75 FR 58962. The
Department lists these DHS fees in the Department Schedule of Fees for
cashiering purposes only. The Department has no authority to set DHS
fees, which are listed at 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1).
Why is the Department adjusting certain nonimmigrant visa, immigrant
visa, citizens services and administrative services fees at this time?
Consistent with OMB Circular A-25 guidelines, the Department
recently completed a fee review using its activity-based Cost of
Service Model. This review was conducted from April 2012 through July
2013 and provides
[[Page 51249]]
the basis for updating the Schedule. The results of that review are
outlined in this rule.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To request more information about the Cost of Service model,
please send your request using one of the methods in the Address
section above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similar to the 2011 fee review, upon which the current Schedule is
based, costs are generated by an activity-based cost model that takes
into account all costs to the U.S. government. Unlike a typical
accounting system, which accounts for only traditional general-ledger-
type costs such as salaries, supplies, travel and other business
expenses, activity-based cost models measure the costs of activities,
or processes, and then provide an additional view of costs by the
products and services produced by an organization through the
identification of the key cost drivers of the activities. Below is a
description of Activity-Based Costing excerpted from the Supplemental
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published on March 24, 2010 (75 FR
14111).
Activity-Based Costing Generally
OMB Circular A-25 states that it is the objective of the United
States Government to ``(a) ensure that each service, sale, or use of
Government goods or resources provided by an agency to specific
recipients be self-sustaining; [and] (b) promote efficient allocation
of the Nation's resources by establishing charges for special benefits
provided to the recipient that are at least as great as costs to the
Government of providing the special benefits . . . .'' OMB Circular A-
25, 5(a)-(b); see also 31 U.S.C. 9701(b)(2)(A) (agency ``may prescribe
regulations establishing the charge for a service or thing of value
provided by the agency . . . based on . . . the costs to the Government
. . . .''). To set prices that are ``self-sustaining,'' the Department
must determine the full cost of providing consular services. Following
guidance provided in Statement 4 of OMB's Statement of Federal
Financial Accounting Standards (SFFAS), available at https://www.fasab.gov/pdffiles/sffas-4.pdf, the Department chose to develop and
use an activity-based costing (ABC) model to determine the full cost of
the services listed in its Schedule of Fees, both those whose fee the
Department proposes to change, as well as those whose fee will remain
unchanged from prior years. The Department refers to the specific ABC
model that underpins the proposed fees as the ``Cost of Service Model''
or ``CoSM.''
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) defines activity-based
costing as a ``set of accounting methods used to identify and describe
costs and required resources for activities within processes.'' Because
an organization can use the same staff and resources (computer
equipment, production facilities, etc.) to produce multiple products or
services, ABC models seek to precisely identify and assign costs to
processes and activities and then to individual products and services
through the identification of key cost drivers referred to as
``resource drivers'' and ``activity drivers.''
Example: Imagine a government agency that has a single facility
it uses to prepare and issue a single product--a driver's license.
In this simple scenario, every cost associated with that facility
(the salaries of employees, the electricity to power the computer
terminals, the cost of a blank driver's license, etc.) can be
attributed directly to the cost of producing that single item. If
that agency wants to ensure that it is charging a ``self-
sustaining'' price for driver's licenses, it only has to divide its
total costs for a given time period by an estimate of the number of
driver's licenses to be produced during that same time period.
However, if that agency issues multiple products (driver's
licenses, non-driver ID cards, etc.), has employees that work on other
activities besides licenses (for example, accepting payment for traffic
tickets), and operates out of multiple facilities it shares with other
agencies, it becomes much more complex for the agency to determine
exactly how much it costs to produce any single product. In those
instances, the agency would need to know what percent of time its
employees spend on each service and how much of its overhead (rent,
utilities, facilities maintenance, etc.) can be allocated to the
delivery of each service to determine the cost of producing each of its
various products--the driver's license, the non-driver ID card, etc.
Using an ABC model would allow the agency to develop those costs.
Components of Activity-Based Costing
As noted in SFFAS Statement 4, ``activity-based costing has gained
broad acceptance by manufacturing and service industries as an
effective managerial tool'' (SSFAS Statement 4, 147). There are no
``off-the-shelf'' ABC models that allow the Department (or any other
entity) to simply populate a few data points and generate an answer.
ABC models require financial and accounting analysis and modeling
skills combined with a detailed understanding of all the organization's
business processes, which, in an entity the size of the Department's
Bureau of Consular Affairs, are exceedingly complex. More specifically,
ABC models require an organization to:
Identify all of the activities that are required to
produce a particular product or service (``activities'');
Identify all of the resources allocated to the production
of (costs) that product or service (``resources'');
Measure the quantity of resources consumed (``resource
driver''); and
Measure the frequency and intensity of demand placed on
activities to produce services (``activity driver'').
For additional details on an activity-based cost model, see the
Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published on March 24, 2010
(75 FR 14111).
Although much of the modeling methodology has remained the same
between fee reviews, the methodology for capturing Department
historical support costs and projected costs has been updated to
reflect the change in the Department's workload. In order to accurately
account for the costs associated with rapidly growing demand for
nonimmigrant visas in locations such as China and Brazil, the current
fee review also incorporates two years of projected costs in addition
to two years of historical costs and one year of current costs. The new
fees represent a weighted average of the annual costs by service for
fiscal years 2010-2014. Costs for individual fiscal years were weighted
by the projected workload volume for that year. These weighted costs by
fiscal year were then added together to generate a single cost per
service upon which the fees are determined.
The CoSM update included a new Overseas Time Survey, conducted in
June 2012, which collected extensive data on both consular activities
and the time spent by consular staff performing consular services at
all overseas locations. Costs related to compensation for consular
staff were then assigned to service categories based on the amount of
time spent performing them. Therefore, the results of the Overseas Time
Survey impacted costs for certain consular services identified below.
Nonimmigrant Visa Application and Border Crossing Card Processing Fees
The Department has determined, based on the CoSM, that the costs to
the Department to accept, adjudicate, and issue each of the different
MRV categories varies. The effort related to some categories such as
petition-based MRVs is appreciably higher than the standard, non-
petition-based MRV application. Each of those petition-
[[Page 51250]]
based nonimmigrant visa categories requires a review of extensive
documentation and a more in-depth applicant interview than other
categories of MRVs. After thorough review through the CoSM, including
updated consular processing time data from the Overseas Time Survey,
the fee for processing E (treaty trader and treaty investor) visa
applications will decrease from $270 to $205, and the fee for
processing K (fianc[eacute] and certain spouses of U.S. citizens) visa
applications will increase from $240 to $265.
The Department rounded these fees to the nearest $5 for the ease of
converting to foreign currencies, which are most often used to pay the
fee. These fees also include the statutory $2 HIV/AIDS/TB/Malaria
surcharge and the $1 special immigrant program surcharge which must be
attached to every MRV fee.
Please note that in June 2013, the authority to charge the $1
surcharge mandated by section 239 of Public Law 110-457, Title II, 122
Stat. 5044, reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1351 (note) lapsed, and the HIV/
AIDS/TB/Malaria surcharge increased from $1 to $2 as mandated by
Congress. See Public Law 110-293, Title V, Sec. 501, 122 Stat. 2968,
reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1351 (note). Because those changes occurred
simultaneously, nonimmigrant visa fees were not affected.
Section 2 of Public Law 113-42, 127 Stat. 552, reproduced at 8
U.S.C. 1351 (note), imposes a temporary $1 surcharge on the fees for
MRV and BCC application processing, to be deposited into the general
fund of the Treasury. This provision will sunset two years after the
first date on which the increased fee is collected. The addition of the
new $1 special immigrant program surcharge also does not affect most
nonimmigrant visa fees. As the Department rounded these fees to the
nearest $5 for the ease of converting foreign currencies, as noted
above, the addition of this surcharge will not affect most MRV and BCC
fees paid by applicants. The exception is the processing fee for BCC
applications by minors under the age of 15, which is statutorily set at
$13. The addition of the $1 special immigrant program surcharge to the
$13 fee and $2 HIV/AIDS/TB/Malaria surcharge will increase the total
fee for this service from $15 to $16.
Immigrant Visa Application Processing Fees
In addition to the nonimmigrant visa application processing fee
modifications referenced above, the Department is adjusting the four-
tiered immigrant visa application processing fees based on the CoSM
calculation for each discrete category of immigrant visa, as
applications for certain categories cost more to process than others.
Accordingly, the application processing fee for a Family-Based Visa
(immediate relative and family preference, processed on the basis of an
approved I-130, I-600 or I-800 petition) will increase from $230 to
$325. The application processing fee for an Employment-Based Visa
(processed on the basis of an approved I-140 alien worker or I-526
alien entrepreneur petition) will decrease from $405 to $345. Other
Immigrant Visa applications (including for I-360 self-petitioners,
special immigrant visa applicants and all others) will have an
application processing fee of $205, down from $220. As noted above,
certain qualifying Iraqi and Afghan Special Immigrant Visa applicants
are statutorily exempt from paying any visa-related fees. Public Law
110-181, div. A, Title XII, Sec. 1244(d), reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1157
(note); Public Law 111-8, div. F, Title VI, Sec. 602(b)(4), reproduced
at 8 U.S.C. 1101 (note).
Immigrant Visa Security Surcharge
The Department is increasing the Immigrant Visa Security Surcharge,
which is applicable to all applicants except those persons who are
statutorily exempted from paying fees, from $75 to $100. The Immigrant
Visa Security Surcharge comprises those costs associated with the
immigrant visa application processing fee that support enhanced border
security. In this update, new data regarding time spent by consular
officials related to enhanced border security in processing immigrant
visa applications, derived from the 2012 Overseas Time Survey, resulted
in an increase to this cost. See 8 U.S.C. 1714 and Public Law 109-472,
Sec. 6, 120 Stat. 3554, reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1714 (note). See also
the Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (75 FR 14111) for
general details regarding the inclusion of Overseas Time Survey data
into the Cost of Service Study. Please note that as of 2012, the
Immigrant Visa Security Surcharge is embedded in the aforementioned
immigrant visa application processing fee and is not charged as a
standalone fee or set forth as a separate fee on the Schedule.
Determining Returning Resident Status
A permanent resident (called lawful permanent resident or LPR) or
conditional resident (CR) who has remained outside the United States
for one year, or beyond the validity period of a Re-entry Permit,
requires a new immigrant visa to enter the United States and resume
permanent residence. A provision exists under U.S. visa law for the
issuance of a returning resident special immigrant visa to an LPR who
remained outside the United States due to circumstances beyond his or
her control. Processing those applications for determination of
eligibility as a returning resident has become less costly due to
continuing advances in automation, making it easier to verify previous
U.S. immigration status. Accordingly, the Department will lower the fee
from $275 to $180.
Waiver of Two-Year Residency Requirement
8 U.S.C. 1182, i.e., Educational Visitor Status; Foreign Residence
Requirement; Waiver describes in detail certain categories of exchange
visitors (J-1) that are subject to a two-year home-country physical
presence requirement. This requires that the exchange visitor return to
the country of his or her nationality or his or her last residence for
at least two years following participation in particular exchange
visitor programs before adjusting status in the United States or
applying for certain visas to travel to the United States. This two-
year residency requirement may be waived in certain circumstances. The
Department charges a fee for processing waiver applications. In
accordance with the results of the CoSM, in which an updated analysis
of time spent performing this activity indicated a reduced percentage
of resources dedicated to this activity, the Department is decreasing
the fee for processing an application for this waiver from $215 to
$120.
Affidavit of Support Review
The Department charges the affidavit of support review fee for all
affidavits of support reviewed at the National Visa Center in
connection with an application for a family-based immigrant visa. The
purpose of the review is to ensure that each affidavit is properly
completed before the National Visa Center forwards it to a consular
post for adjudication. The Department is increasing the fee from $88 to
$120 to reflect the increase in the cost of providing this service, as
determined by the CoSM, including updated analysis of time spent
performing this activity.
Documentation for Renunciation of Citizenship
The CoSM demonstrated that documenting a U.S. citizen's
renunciation of citizenship is extremely costly, requiring American
consular officers overseas to spend substantial amounts of time to
accept, process, and
[[Page 51251]]
adjudicate cases. For example, consular officers must confirm that the
potential renunciant fully understands the consequences of
renunciation, including losing the right to reside in the United States
without documentation as an alien. Other steps include verifying that
the renunciant is a U.S. citizen, conducting a minimum of two intensive
interviews with the potential renunciant, and reviewing at least three
consular systems before administering the oath of renunciation. The
final approval of the loss of nationality must be done by law within
the Directorate of Overseas Citizens Services in Washington, DC, after
which the case is returned to the consular officer overseas for final
delivery of the Certificate of Loss of Nationality to the renunciant.
These steps further add to the time and labor that must be involved in
the process. Accordingly, the Department is increasing the fee for
processing such requests from $450 to $2,350. As noted in the interim
final rule dated June 28, 2010 (77 FR 36522), the fee of $450 was set
substantially below the cost to the U.S. government of providing this
service (less than one quarter of the cost). Since that time, demand
for the service has increased dramatically, consuming far more consular
officer time and resources, as reflected in the 2012 Overseas Time
Survey and increased workload data. Because the Department believes
there is no public benefit or other reason for setting this fee below
cost, the Department is increasing this fee to reflect the full cost of
providing the service. Therefore the increased fee reflects both the
increased cost of the provision of service as well as the determination
to now charge the full cost.
Consular Time Charges
The Department previously charged a consular time fee of $231 per
hour, per employee. This fee is charged when indicated on the Schedule
of Fees or when services are performed away from the office or outside
regular business hours. The CoSM estimated that the hourly consular
time charge is now lower. Accordingly, the Department is lowering this
fee to $135 per hour.
When will the Department of State implement this interim final rule?
The Department intends to implement this interim final rule, and
initiate collection of the fees set forth herein, effective 15 days
after publication of this rule in the Federal Register.
Regulatory Findings
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department is publishing this rule as an interim final rule,
with a 60-day provision for post-promulgation comments and with an
effective date less than 30 days from the date of publication, based on
the ``good cause'' exceptions set forth at 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and
553(d)(3). Delaying implementation of this rule would be contrary to
the public interest because the fees in this rule fund consular
services that are critical to national security, including screening
visa applicants.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department has reviewed this rule and, by approving it,
certifies that it will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601(6).
This rule decreases the application processing fees for employer-
sponsored petition-based immigrant visas. The issuance of these visas
is contingent upon approval by DHS of a petition filed by a United
States company with DHS, and these companies pay a petition fee to DHS
to cover the processing of the petition. The visa itself is sought and
paid for by an individual foreign national overseas who seeks to come
to the United States. The amount of the petition fees that are paid by
small entities to DHS is not, in any way, connected to or controlled by
the amount of the visa fees paid by individuals to the Department of
State. While small entities may cover or reimburse employees for
application processing fees, the State Department is unaware of the
number of such entities that do so as it, again, is not a process
controlled by the State Department. The workload volume in this
category accounts for only four percent of the total immigrant workload
expected in FY 2014. The $60 decrease in the application processing fee
for these immigrant visas will likely have a positive, albeit
insignificant, economic impact on the small entities that choose to
reimburse the applicant for the visa fee. Therefore the State
Department certifies that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by state, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any year, and it will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary
under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2
U.S.C. 1501-1504.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
The Department has reviewed this rule to ensure its consistency
with the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in the
Executive Orders. This rule has been submitted to OMB for review.
This rule is necessary in light of the Department of State's CoSM
finding that the cost of processing various categories of nonimmigrant
and immigrant visas and of providing certain overseas citizens services
has changed since those fees were last amended in 2012 and 2010,
respectively. The Department is setting the new fees in accordance with
31 U.S.C. 9701 and other applicable legal authority, as described in
detail above. See, e.g., 31 U.S.C. 9701(b)(2)(A) (``The head of each
agency . . . may prescribe regulations establishing the charge for a
service or thing of value provided by the agency . . . based on . . .
the costs to the government.''). This regulation sets the fees for
consular services at the amount required to recover the costs
associated with providing that service.
Details of the fee changes are as follows:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
annual number Estimated
Item No. Proposed fee Unit cost Current fee Change in fee Percentage of change in
increase applications annual fees
\1\ collected \2\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR CONSULAR SERVICES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 51252]]
PASSPORT AND CITIZENSHIP SERVICES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Administrative Processing of Formal $2,350 $2,349 $450 $1,900 422 2,378 $4,518,200
Renunciation of U.S. Citizenship.......
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NONIMMIGRANT VISA SERVICES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21. Nonimmigrant Visa Application and
Border Crossing Card Processing Fees
(per person):
(c) E category nonimmigrant visa.... $205 $205 $270 ($65) -24 46,901 -$3,048,565
(d) K category nonimmigrant visa.... $265 $262 $240 $25 10 16,708 $417,700
(f) Border crossing card--under age $16 (\3\) $15 $1 7 250,000 $250,000
15; for Mexican citizens if parent
or guardian has or is applying for
a border crossing card (valid 10
years or until the applicant
reaches age 15; whichever is
sooner)............................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMMIGRANT AND SPECIAL VISA SERVICES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
32. Immigrant Visa Application
Processing Fee (per person)
(a) Immediate relative and family $325 $322 $230 $95 41 575,360 $54,659,200
preference applications............
(b) Employment-based applications... $345 $344 $405 ($60) -15 26,811 -$1,608,660
(c) Other immigrant visa $205 $204 $220 ($15) -7 1,559 -$23,385
applications (including I-360 self-
petitioners and special immigrant
visa applicants)...................
34. Affidavit of Support Review......... $120 $116 $88 $32 36 317,898 $10,172,736
35. Special Visa Services:
(a) Determining Returning Resident $180 $178 $275 ($95) -35 3,412 -$324,140
Status.............................
(c) Waiver of Two-Year Residency $120 $116 $215 ($95) -44 10,488 -$996,360
Requirement........................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
75. Consular Time Charges............... $135 $134 $231 ($96) -42 134 -$12,864
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. $64,003,862
[[Page 51253]]
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Based on projected FY 2014 workload.
\2\ Using projected FY 2014 workload to generate projections.
\3\ The fee for Border Crossing Card applications by minors is statutorily set.
Historically, nonimmigrant visa workload has increased year to year
at approximately 11 percent. The Department anticipates that with the
current state of the global economy, demand will be approximately 10.1
million in Fiscal Year 2014. With regard to the economic impact as a
whole, the more than 94 percent of nonimmigrant visa applications that
are not petition-based are sought by and paid for entirely by foreign
national applicants. The revenue increases resulting from those fees
should not be considered to have a direct cost impact on the domestic
economy.
With regard to immigrant visas, many categories are numerically
capped by law; these caps limit workload and keep current demand fairly
stable. In FY 2013, the Department issued 9.1 percent of all available
immigrant visas in Employment-Based categories (capped at 140,000
including adjustments of status processed domestically by DHS). In FY
2013, all immigrant visas available under the Diversity Visa program
were issued (capped at 50,000 including adjustments of status processed
domestically by DHS). Also in FY 2013, the Department issued 84.9
percent of the immigrant visas available for Family-Preference
categories (capped at 226,000 including adjustments of status processed
domestically by DHS).
There are nearly 5.7 million applicants currently awaiting
numerically-controlled visas, sufficient to fill more than 12 years'
workload at the current annual caps, and this does not take into
account applicants who would be adjusting status in the United States.
It is reasonable to expect that the immigrant visa workload for FY 2014
and FY 2015 will remain about the same as FY 2013. However, please note
that these estimates do not take into account variables that the
Department cannot predict at this time, such as legislative changes
contemplated by Comprehensive Immigration Reform.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Sec. 6 of
Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant
the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on federal programs and activities do
not apply to this regulation.
Executive Order 13175
The Department has determined that this rulemaking will not have
tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not preempt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply to
this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not create or revise any reporting or record-keeping
requirements.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 22
Consular services, Fees, Passports and visas.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the preamble, 22 CFR part 22
is amended as follows:
PART 22--SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR CONSULAR SERVICES--DEPARTMENT OF
STATE AND FOREIGN SERVICE
0
1. The authority citation for part 22 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101 note, 1153 note, 1183a note, 1351,
1351 note, 1714, 1714 note; 10 U.S.C. 2602(c); 11 U.S.C. 1157 note;
22 U.S.C. 214, 214 note, 1475e, 2504(a), 4201, 4206, 4215, 4219,
6551; 31 U.S.C. 9701; Exec. Order 10,718, 22 FR 4632 (1957); Exec.
Order 11,295, 31 FR 10603 (1966).
0
2. Section 22.1 is amended by revising the introductory text and items
8, 21, 32, 34, 35, and 75 in the ``Schedule of Fees for Consular
Services'' table and removing item 36 to read as follows:
Sec. 22.1 Schedule of fees.
The following table sets forth the new fees for the following
categories listed on the U.S. Department of State's Schedule of Fees
for Consular Services:
Schedule of Fees for Consular Services
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item No. Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PASSPORT AND CITIZENSHIP SERVICES
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
8. Administrative Processing of $2,350
Formal Renunciation of U.S.
Citizenship.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
NONIMMIGRANT VISA SERVICES
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
21. Nonimmigrant Visa Application
and Border Crossing Card Processing
Fees (per person):
(a) Non-petition-based $160
nonimmigrant visa (except E
category).
(b) H, L, O, P, Q and R category $190
nonimmigrant visa.
[[Page 51254]]
(c) E category nonimmigrant visa $205
(d) K category (fianc[eacute]) $265
nonimmigrant visa.
(e) Border crossing card--age 15 $160
and over (10 year validity).
(f) Border crossing card--under $16
age 15; for Mexican citizens if
parent or guardian has or is
applying for a border crossing
card (valid 10 years or until
the applicant reaches age 15,
whichever is sooner).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
IMMIGRANT AND SPECIAL VISA SERVICES
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
32. Immigrant Visa Application
Processing Fee (per person)
(a) Immediate relative and $325
family preference applications.
(b) Employment-based $345
applications.
(c) Other immigrant visa $205
applications (including I-360
self-petitioners and special
immigrant visa applicants).
(d) Certain Iraqi and Afghan NO FEE.
special immigrant visa
applications.
* * * * * * *
34. Affidavit of Support Review $120
(only when reviewed domestically).
35. Special Visa Services:
(a) Determining Returning $180
Resident Status.
(b) Waiver of two year residency $120
requirement.
(c) Waiver of immigrant visa For fee amount, see 8 CFR
ineligibility (collected for 103.7(b)(1).
USCIS and subject to change).
(d) Refugee or significant NO FEE.
public benefit parole case
processing.
(Items 36 through 40 vacant.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
75. Consular Time Charges: As $135
required by this schedule and for
fee services performed away from
the office or during after-duty
hours (per hour or part thereof/per
consular officer).
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: August 14, 2014.
Patrick Kennedy,
Under Secretary of State for Management, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-20516 Filed 8-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P