Irish Potatoes Grown in Washington; Modification of the Handling Regulations for Yellow Fleshed and White Types of Potatoes, 51069-51071 [2014-20409]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 166 / Wednesday, August 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
reserve need not be reduced to conform
to any recomputed average. The
Committee expects to carry a $60,000
reserve into the 2014–15 crop year. It
expects to add $2,800 to the reserve
during the year, for a carryout of
approximately $62,800, which is below
the limit specified in the order.
The Committee reviewed and
unanimously recommended 2014–15
crop year expenditures of $56,200. Prior
to arriving at this budget, the Committee
considered information from various
sources, such as the Committee’s Budget
Subcommittee. Alternative expenditure
levels and assessment rates were
discussed by the subcommittee, based
upon the relative value of various
projects to the date industry and the
Committee. The assessment rate of $0.20
per hundredweight of dates was then
recommended after consideration of
several factors, including the
anticipated 2014–15 crop size, the
Committee’s estimates of the incoming
reserve funds, other income, and their
anticipated expenses.
A review of historical and preliminary
information pertaining to the upcoming
crop year indicates that the grower price
for the 2014–15 crop year could range
between $45.00 and $55.00 per
hundredweight of dates. Utilizing these
estimates and the assessment rate of
$0.20 per hundredweight, the estimated
assessment revenue for the 2014–15
crop year as a percentage of total grower
revenue could range between 0.36 and
0.44 percent.
This action decreases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers, and some of the costs may
be passed on to producers. However,
decreasing the assessment rate reduces
the burden on handlers, and may reduce
the burden on producers. In addition,
the Committee’s and subcommittee’s
meetings were widely publicized
throughout the California date industry,
and all interested persons were invited
to attend the meetings and encouraged
to participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all
Committee meetings, the June 25, 2014,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on this issue. Industry
members also discussed the various
possible assessment rates, potential crop
size, and estimated expenses at the
Budget Subcommittee meeting on June
4, 2014. Finally, interested persons are
invited to submit comments on this
interim rule, including the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Aug 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178,
‘‘Vegetable and Specialty Crop
Marketing Orders.’’ No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action
are necessary. Should any changes
become necessary, they would be
submitted to OMB for approval.
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large Riverside
County, California date handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect, and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) The 2014–15 crop year
begins on October 1, 2014, and the
marketing order requires that the rate of
assessment for each crop year apply to
all assessable dates handled during such
crop year; (2) the action decreases the
assessment rate for assessable dates
beginning with the 2014–15 crop year;
(3) handlers are aware of this action
which was unanimously recommended
by the Committee at a public meeting
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51069
and is similar to other assessment rate
actions issued in past years; and (4) this
interim rule provides a 60-day comment
period. All comments timely received
will be considered prior to finalization
of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 987
Dates, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 987 is amended as
follows:
PART 987—DATES PRODUCED OR
PACKED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 987 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 987.339 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 987.339
Assessment rate.
On and after October 1, 2014, an
assessment rate of $0.20 per
hundredweight is established for
Riverside County, California dates.
Dated: August 22, 2014.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–20413 Filed 8–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 946
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–14–0026; FV14–946–1
FIR]
Irish Potatoes Grown in Washington;
Modification of the Handling
Regulations for Yellow Fleshed and
White Types of Potatoes
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as
final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Agriculture is adopting, as a final rule,
without change, an interim rule that
extended the temporary exemption of
yellow fleshed and white skin (white
types) potatoes from minimum quality,
maturity, pack, marking, and inspection
requirements under the Washington
potato marketing order through the
2014–2015 and subsequent fiscal
periods. This rule is expected to reduce
overall industry expenses and increase
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
51070
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 166 / Wednesday, August 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
net returns to producers and handlers
while continuing to give the industry
the opportunity to explore alternative
marketing strategies.
DATES: Effective August 28, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Teresa Hutchinson, Marketing
Specialist, or Gary Olson, Regional
Director, Northwest Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326–
2724, Fax: (503) 326–7440, or Email:
Teresa.Hutchinson@ams.usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain
information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by
viewing a guide at the following Web
site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide;
or by contacting Jeffrey Smutny,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
946, as amended (7 CFR part 946),
regulating the handling of Irish potatoes
grown in Washington, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13175.
The handling of Irish potatoes grown
in Washington is regulated by 7 CFR
part 946. This rule continues in effect
the interim rule that extended the
temporary exemption of yellow fleshed
and white types of potatoes from the
order’s handling regulations through the
2014–2015 and subsequent fiscal
periods. This rule allows the
Washington potato industry to continue
to market yellow fleshed and white
types of potatoes without regard to the
minimum quality, maturity, pack,
marking, and inspection requirements
prescribed under the order.
In an interim rule published in the
Federal Register on May 7, 2014, and
effective on July 1, 2014 (79 FR 26109,
Doc. No. AMS–FV–14–0026, FV14–946–
1 IR), § 946.336 was amended to exempt
yellow fleshed and white types of
potatoes from minimum quality,
maturity, pack, marking, and inspection
requirements under the Washington
potato marketing order through the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Aug 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
2014–2015 and subsequent fiscal
periods.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are 43 handlers of Washington
potatoes subject to regulation under the
order and approximately 267 producers
in the regulated production area. Small
agricultural service firms are defined by
the Small Business Administration as
those having annual receipts of less than
$7,000,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000
(13 CFR 121.201).
For the 2011–2012 marketing year, the
Committee reports that 11,018,670
hundredweight of Washington potatoes
were shipped into the fresh market.
Based on average f.o.b. prices estimated
by the USDA’s Economic Research
Service and Committee data on
individual handler shipments, the
Committee estimates that 42, or
approximately 98 percent of the
handlers, had annual receipts of less
than $7,000,000.
In addition, based on information
provided by the National Agricultural
Statistics Service, the average producer
price for Washington potatoes for 2011–
2012 was $7.90 per hundredweight. The
average gross annual revenue for the 267
Washington potato producers is
therefore calculated to be approximately
$326,021. In view of the foregoing, the
majority of Washington potato handlers
and producers may be classified as
small entities.
This rule continues in effect the
action that extended the temporary
exemption of yellow fleshed and white
types of potatoes from the handling
regulations through the 2014–2015 and
subsequent fiscal periods. This rule
amends the provisions in § 946.336.
Authority for the change in the order’s
rules and regulations is provided in
§ 946.52.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Committee does not anticipate
that this rule will negatively impact
small businesses. This rule will exempt
yellow fleshed and white types of
potatoes from minimum quality,
maturity, pack, marking, and inspection
requirements. Though inspections are
not mandatory for such potatoes during
the exemption period, handlers may
voluntarily choose to have their
potatoes inspected. Handlers are thus
able to control costs based on the
demands of their customers.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178, Generic
Vegetable and Specialty Crops. No
changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary.
Should any changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
During the exemption period,
handlers will continue to be required to
report fresh shipments of yellow fleshed
and white types of potatoes monthly.
While this rule requires a reporting
requirement for shipments of yellow
fleshed and white types of potatoes,
their exemption from handling
regulations also eliminates the more
frequent reporting requirements
imposed under the order’s special
purpose shipment exemptions
(§ 946.336(d) and (e)). Under these
paragraphs, handlers are required to
provide detailed reports whenever they
divert regulated potatoes for livestock
feed, charity, seed, prepeeling,
processing, grading and storing in
specified counties in Oregon, and
experimentation.
Therefore, any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large handlers of yellow fleshed
and white types of potatoes are expected
to be offset by the elimination of the
other reporting requirements currently
in effect. In addition, the exemption
from handling regulations and
inspection requirements for yellow
fleshed and white types of potatoes is
expected to reduce industry expenses.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this rule.
Further, the Committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
Washington potato industry and all
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 166 / Wednesday, August 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
interested persons were invited to
participate in Committee deliberations.
Like all Committee meetings, the
December 10, 2013, meeting was a
public meeting and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express
views on this issue.
Comments on the interim rule were
required to be received on or before July
7, 2014. No comments were received.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the
interim rule, we are adopting the
interim rule as a final rule, without
change.
To view the interim rule, go to:
https://www.regulations.gov/#!document
Detail;D=AMS-FV-14-0026-0001.
This action also affirms information
contained in the interim rule concerning
Executive Orders 12866, 12988, 13175,
and 13563; the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35); and the EGov Act (44 U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that
finalizing the interim rule, without
change as published in the Federal
Register (79 FR 26109, May 7, 2014)
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 946
Marketing agreements, Potatoes,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 946—IRISH POTATOES GROWN
IN WASHINGTON
Accordingly, the interim rule that
amended 7 CFR part 946 and that was
published at 79 FR 26109 on May 7,
2014, is adopted as a final rule, without
change.
■
Dated: August 22, 2014.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–20409 Filed 8–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0176; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–066–AD; Amendment
39–17951; AD 2014–16–27]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault
Aviation Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Aug 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
ACTION:
Final rule.
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Dassault Aviation Model FALCON
900EX airplanes. This AD was
prompted by our determination of the
need for a revision to the airplane
airworthiness limitations to introduce a
corrosion prevention control program,
among other changes, to the
maintenance requirements and
airworthiness limitations. This AD
requires revising the maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
include the maintenance tasks and
airworthiness limitations specified in
the Airworthiness Limitations section of
the airplane maintenance manual. We
are issuing this AD to prevent reduced
structural integrity of the airplane, and
prevent reduced controllability of the
airplane.
SUMMARY:
This AD becomes effective
October 1, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of October 1, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://www.
regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA2014-0176; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet,
P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, NJ
07606; telephone 201–440–6700;
Internet https://www.dassaultfalcon.com.
You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1137;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain Dassault Aviation
Model FALCON 900EX airplanes. The
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on March 31, 2014 (79 FR
17942).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51071
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013–0052,
dated March 4, 2013 (referred to after
this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for certain Dassault Aviation Model
FALCON 900EX airplanes. The MCAI
states:
The airworthiness limitations and
maintenance requirements for the Falcon
900EX type design relating to Falcon 900EX
Easy, Falcon 900LX and Falcon 900DX
variants, are included in Aircraft
Maintenance Manual (AMM) chapter 5–40
and are approved by the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA).
EASA issued AD 2008–0221 [https://ad.
easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2008_0221_
Corrected.pdf/AD_2008–0221_1] to require
accomplishment of the maintenance tasks
and implementation of the airworthiness
limitations, as specified in Dassault Aviation
Falcon 900EX Easy/900LX/900DX AMM
chapter 5–40 referenced DGT 113875 at
revision 3.
Since that [EASA] AD was issued, Dassault
Aviation issued revision 7 of Falcon 900EX
Easy/900LX/900DX AMM chapter 5–40,
which contains new or more restrictive
maintenance requirements and/or
airworthiness limitations and introduces,
among others, the following changes:
—Tasks renumbering,
—Introduction of a Corrosion Prevention
Control Program (CPCP),
—Revised overhaul limits for screwjack of
flap actuators -3 version;
—Revised interval for checking the screw/nut
play on screwjack of flap actuators -3
version;
—Removal of service life limit for screwjack
of flap actuators;
—Test of flap asymmetry protection system,
with an extended inspection interval;
—Inspection procedures of fuselage and
wings;
—Check of overpressure tightness on
pressurization control regulating valves.
Compliance with this check is required by
EASA AD 2008–0072, but AMM chapter 5–
40 DGT 113875 at revision 7 introduces an
extended inspection interval;
—Check of overpressure relief valve vacuum
supply lines. The maintenance tasks and
airworthiness limitations, as specified in
the Falcon 900EX Easy/900LX/900DX
AMM chapter 5–40, have been identified
as mandatory actions for continued
airworthiness of the Falcon EX Easy,
Falcon 900LX and Falcon 900DX variants
of the F900EX type design. Failure to
comply with AMM chapter 5–40 at
revision 7 may result in an unsafe
condition.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD requires the implementation of
the maintenance tasks and airworthiness
limitations, as specified in the Dassault
Aviation Falcon 900EX Easy/900LX/900DX
AMM chapter 5–40 DGT 113875 at revision
7.
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51069-51071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20409]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 946
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-14-0026; FV14-946-1 FIR]
Irish Potatoes Grown in Washington; Modification of the Handling
Regulations for Yellow Fleshed and White Types of Potatoes
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture is adopting, as a final rule,
without change, an interim rule that extended the temporary exemption
of yellow fleshed and white skin (white types) potatoes from minimum
quality, maturity, pack, marking, and inspection requirements under the
Washington potato marketing order through the 2014-2015 and subsequent
fiscal periods. This rule is expected to reduce overall industry
expenses and increase
[[Page 51070]]
net returns to producers and handlers while continuing to give the
industry the opportunity to explore alternative marketing strategies.
DATES: Effective August 28, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa Hutchinson, Marketing
Specialist, or Gary Olson, Regional Director, Northwest Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable
Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326-2724, Fax: (503) 326-7440, or
Email: Teresa.Hutchinson@ams.usda.gov or GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by viewing a guide at the following
Web site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide; or
by contacting Jeffrey Smutny, Marketing Order and Agreement Division,
Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax:
(202) 720-8938, or Email: Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 946, as amended (7 CFR part 946), regulating the handling of Irish
potatoes grown in Washington, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13175.
The handling of Irish potatoes grown in Washington is regulated by
7 CFR part 946. This rule continues in effect the interim rule that
extended the temporary exemption of yellow fleshed and white types of
potatoes from the order's handling regulations through the 2014-2015
and subsequent fiscal periods. This rule allows the Washington potato
industry to continue to market yellow fleshed and white types of
potatoes without regard to the minimum quality, maturity, pack,
marking, and inspection requirements prescribed under the order.
In an interim rule published in the Federal Register on May 7,
2014, and effective on July 1, 2014 (79 FR 26109, Doc. No. AMS-FV-14-
0026, FV14-946-1 IR), Sec. 946.336 was amended to exempt yellow
fleshed and white types of potatoes from minimum quality, maturity,
pack, marking, and inspection requirements under the Washington potato
marketing order through the 2014-2015 and subsequent fiscal periods.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are 43 handlers of Washington potatoes subject to regulation
under the order and approximately 267 producers in the regulated
production area. Small agricultural service firms are defined by the
Small Business Administration as those having annual receipts of less
than $7,000,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as those
having annual receipts of less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
For the 2011-2012 marketing year, the Committee reports that
11,018,670 hundredweight of Washington potatoes were shipped into the
fresh market. Based on average f.o.b. prices estimated by the USDA's
Economic Research Service and Committee data on individual handler
shipments, the Committee estimates that 42, or approximately 98 percent
of the handlers, had annual receipts of less than $7,000,000.
In addition, based on information provided by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service, the average producer price for
Washington potatoes for 2011-2012 was $7.90 per hundredweight. The
average gross annual revenue for the 267 Washington potato producers is
therefore calculated to be approximately $326,021. In view of the
foregoing, the majority of Washington potato handlers and producers may
be classified as small entities.
This rule continues in effect the action that extended the
temporary exemption of yellow fleshed and white types of potatoes from
the handling regulations through the 2014-2015 and subsequent fiscal
periods. This rule amends the provisions in Sec. 946.336. Authority
for the change in the order's rules and regulations is provided in
Sec. 946.52.
The Committee does not anticipate that this rule will negatively
impact small businesses. This rule will exempt yellow fleshed and white
types of potatoes from minimum quality, maturity, pack, marking, and
inspection requirements. Though inspections are not mandatory for such
potatoes during the exemption period, handlers may voluntarily choose
to have their potatoes inspected. Handlers are thus able to control
costs based on the demands of their customers.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0178, Generic Vegetable and Specialty Crops. No
changes in those requirements as a result of this action are necessary.
Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
During the exemption period, handlers will continue to be required
to report fresh shipments of yellow fleshed and white types of potatoes
monthly. While this rule requires a reporting requirement for shipments
of yellow fleshed and white types of potatoes, their exemption from
handling regulations also eliminates the more frequent reporting
requirements imposed under the order's special purpose shipment
exemptions (Sec. 946.336(d) and (e)). Under these paragraphs, handlers
are required to provide detailed reports whenever they divert regulated
potatoes for livestock feed, charity, seed, prepeeling, processing,
grading and storing in specified counties in Oregon, and
experimentation.
Therefore, any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large handlers of yellow fleshed and white types of
potatoes are expected to be offset by the elimination of the other
reporting requirements currently in effect. In addition, the exemption
from handling regulations and inspection requirements for yellow
fleshed and white types of potatoes is expected to reduce industry
expenses.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap
or conflict with this rule.
Further, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout
the Washington potato industry and all
[[Page 51071]]
interested persons were invited to participate in Committee
deliberations. Like all Committee meetings, the December 10, 2013,
meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
Comments on the interim rule were required to be received on or
before July 7, 2014. No comments were received. Therefore, for the
reasons given in the interim rule, we are adopting the interim rule as
a final rule, without change.
To view the interim rule, go to: https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=AMS-FV-14-0026-0001.
This action also affirms information contained in the interim rule
concerning Executive Orders 12866, 12988, 13175, and 13563; the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35); and the E-Gov Act (44
U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant material presented, it is found
that finalizing the interim rule, without change as published in the
Federal Register (79 FR 26109, May 7, 2014) will tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 946
Marketing agreements, Potatoes, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 946--IRISH POTATOES GROWN IN WASHINGTON
0
Accordingly, the interim rule that amended 7 CFR part 946 and that was
published at 79 FR 26109 on May 7, 2014, is adopted as a final rule,
without change.
Dated: August 22, 2014.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-20409 Filed 8-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P