Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer), 51074-51077 [2014-19683]
Download as PDF
51074
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 166 / Wednesday, August 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–1137; fax 425–227–1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9–ANM–116–
AMOC–REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Dassault Aviation’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(k) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013–0053, dated
March 4, 2013, for related information. This
MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0176-0002.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Chapter 5–40, Airworthiness
Limitations, DGT 113875, Revision 7, dated
September 2012, of the Falcon 900 EX EASy,
Falcon 900LX, and Falcon 900 DX
Maintenance Manual.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box
2000, South Hackensack, NJ 07606;
telephone 201–440–6700; Internet https://
www.dassaultfalcon.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://www.archives.
gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Aug 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
7, 2014.
Victor Wicklund,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
Federal Aviation Administration
Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170—Putim—
˜
12227–901 Sao Jose dos Campos—SP—
BRASIL; telephone +55 12 3927–5852 or
+55 12 3309–0732; fax +55 12 3927–
7546; email distrib@embraer.com.br;
Internet https://www.flyembraer.com.
You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
14 CFR Part 39
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2014–19677 Filed 8–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0234; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–220–AD; Amendment
39–17952; AD 2014–16–28 ]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(Embraer)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(Embraer) Model EMB–135BJ airplanes.
This AD was prompted by reports of
failure of the bolts that connect the
cockpit windshield center-post to the
forward fuselage. This AD requires
repetitive detailed inspections to detect
discrepancies on the attaching parts of
the cockpit windshield center-post;
checking whether the bolts are
tightened, if applicable; and modifying
parts, including inspecting for and
repairing damage. We are issuing this
AD to prevent failed bolts and failed
attaching parts of the cockpit
windshield center-post, which could
lead to loss of structural integrity of the
airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
October 1, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of October 1, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov#!docketDetail;
D=FAA-2014-0234 or in person at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Empresa Brasileira de
Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1175;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain Empresa Brasileira de
Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer) Model
EMB–135BJ airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
April 15, 2014 (79 FR 21160).
ˆ
The Agencia Nacional de Aviacao
¸˜
Civil (ANAC), which is the aviation
authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian
Airworthiness Directive 2013–10–02,
dated October 23, 2013 (referred to after
this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
certain Empresa Brasileira de
Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer) Model
EMB–135BJ airplanes. The MCAI states:
This [Brazilian] AD was prompted by
reports of failure of the bolts that connect the
lower eyelet fitting of the cockpit windshield
center-post to the forward fuselage. We are
issuing this [Brazilian] AD to detect failed
bolts and correct the attaching parts of the
lower eyelet fitting of the cockpit windshield
center-post, which could lead to loss of
structural integrity of the airplane.
Required actions include repetitive
detailed inspections for discrepancies
on the attaching parts of the lower
eyelet fitting of the cockpit windshield
center-post; a bolt check, if applicable;
and modification of the attaching parts
of the lower eyelet fitting of the cockpit
windshield center-post, including a
general visual inspection for damage of
the specified lower eyelet fitting and
repair of the damage. The modification
would terminate the repetitive detailed
inspections. You may examine the
MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-02340002.
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 166 / Wednesday, August 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM (79
FR 21160, April 15, 2014) or on the
determination of the cost to the public.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
‘‘Contacting the Manufacturer’’
Paragraph in This AD
Since late 2006, we have included a
standard paragraph titled ‘‘Airworthy
Product’’ in all MCAI ADs in which the
FAA develops an AD based on a foreign
authority’s AD.
The MCAI or referenced service
information in an FAA AD often directs
the owner/operator to contact the
manufacturer for corrective actions,
such as a repair. Briefly, the Airworthy
Product paragraph allowed owners/
operators to use corrective actions
provided by the manufacturer if those
actions were FAA-approved. In
addition, the paragraph stated that any
actions approved by the State of Design
Authority (or its delegated agent) are
considered to be FAA-approved.
In the NPRM (79 FR 21160, April 15,
2014), we proposed to prevent the use
of repairs that were not specifically
developed to correct the unsafe
condition, by requiring that the repair
approval provided by the State of
Design Authority or its delegated agent
specifically refer to this FAA AD. This
change was intended to clarify the
method of compliance and to provide
operators with better visibility of repairs
that are specifically developed and
approved to correct the unsafe
condition. In addition, we proposed to
change the phrase ‘‘its delegated agent’’
to include a design approval holder
(DAH) with State of Design Authority
design organization approval (DOA), as
applicable, to refer to a DAH authorized
to approve required repairs for the
proposed AD.
No comments were provided to the
NPRM (79 FR 21160, April 15, 2014)
about these proposed changes. However,
a comment was provided for an NPRM
having Directorate Identifier 2012–NM–
101–AD (78 FR 78285, December 26,
2013). The commenter stated the
following: ‘‘The proposed wording,
being specific to repairs, eliminates the
interpretation that Airbus messages are
acceptable for approving minor
deviations (corrective actions) needed
during accomplishment of an AD
mandated Airbus service bulletin.’’
This comment has made the FAA
aware that some operators have
misunderstood or misinterpreted the
Airworthy Product paragraph to allow
the owner/operator to use messages
provided by the manufacturer as
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Aug 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
approval of deviations during the
accomplishment of an AD-mandated
action. The Airworthy Product
paragraph does not approve messages or
other information provided by the
manufacturer for deviations to the
requirements of the AD-mandated
actions. The Airworthy Product
paragraph only addresses the
requirement to contact the manufacturer
for corrective actions for the identified
unsafe condition and does not cover
deviations from other AD requirements.
However, deviations to AD-required
actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17,
and anyone may request the approval
for an alternative method of compliance
to the AD-required actions using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
To address this misunderstanding and
misinterpretation of the Airworthy
Product paragraph, we have changed
that paragraph and retitled it
‘‘Contacting the Manufacturer.’’ This
paragraph now clarifies that for any
requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer,
the action must be accomplished using
a method approved by the FAA, ANAC,
or ANAC’s authorized Designee.
The Contacting the Manufacturer
paragraph also clarifies that, if approved
by the ANAC Designee, the approval
must include the Designee’s authorized
signature. The Designee signature
indicates that the data and information
contained in the document are ANACapproved, which is also FAA-approved.
Messages and other information
provided by the manufacturer that do
not contain the ANAC Designee’s
authorized signature approval are not
ANAC-approved, unless ANAC directly
approves the manufacturer’s message or
other information.
This clarification does not remove
flexibility previously afforded by the
Airworthy Product paragraph.
Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never
intended for required actions. This is
also consistent with the
recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation
Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by
identifying those actions in
manufacturers’ service instructions that
are ‘‘Required for Compliance’’ with
ADs. We continue to work with
manufacturers to implement this
recommendation. But once we
determine that an action is required, any
deviation from the requirement must be
approved as an alternative method of
compliance.
Other commenters to the NPRM
having Directorate Identifier 2012–NM–
101–AD (78 FR 78285, December 26,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51075
2013) pointed out that in many cases the
foreign manufacturer’s service bulletin
and the foreign authority’s MCAI might
have been issued some time before the
FAA AD. Therefore, the DOA might
have provided U.S. operators with an
approved repair, developed with full
awareness of the unsafe condition,
before the FAA AD is issued. Under
these circumstances, to comply with the
FAA AD, the operator would be
required to go back to the
manufacturer’s DOA and obtain a new
approval document, adding time and
expense to the compliance process with
no safety benefit.
Based on these comments, we
removed the requirement that the DAHprovided repair specifically refer to this
AD. Before adopting such a
requirement, the FAA will coordinate
with affected DAHs and verify they are
prepared to implement means to ensure
that their repair approvals consider the
unsafe condition addressed in this AD.
Any such requirements will be adopted
through the normal AD rulemaking
process, including notice-and-comment
procedures, when appropriate.
We also have decided not to include
a generic reference to either the
‘‘delegated agent’’ or ‘‘DAH with State of
Design Authority design organization
approval,’’ but instead we have
provided the specific delegation
approval granted by the State of Design
Authority for the DAH throughout this
AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (79 FR
21160, April 15, 2014) for correcting the
unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 21160,
April 15, 2014).
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 56
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 35 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this AD. The average labor rate is $85
per work hour. Required parts would
cost about $386 per product. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
51076
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 166 / Wednesday, August 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section.
this AD on U.S. operators to be
$188,216, or $3,361 per product.
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition actions
specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://www.regulations.
gov#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0234; or
in person at the Docket Management
Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Aug 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2014–16–28 Empresa Brasileira de
Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer):
Amendment 39–17952. Docket No.
FAA–2014–0234; Directorate Identifier
2013–NM–220–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective October 1, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Empresa Brasileira de
Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer) Model EMB–
135BJ airplanes, certificated in any category,
as identified in Embraer Alert Service
Bulletin 145LEG–53–A032, Revision 01,
dated September 24, 2013.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of failure
of the bolts that connect the cockpit
windshield center-post to the forward
fuselage. We are issuing this AD to prevent
failed bolts and failed attaching parts of the
cockpit windshield center-post, which could
lead to loss of structural integrity of the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Detailed Inspection
At the applicable time specified in
paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, do a
detailed inspection to detect discrepancies
on the attaching parts of the lower eyelet
fitting of the cockpit windshield center-post
and, if applicable, check whether the bolts
are tightened, in accordance with Part I of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Embraer
Alert Service Bulletin 145LEG–53–A032,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Revision 01, dated September 24, 2013. If any
discrepancy is found or if any bolt is not
tightened, do the actions specified in
paragraph (h) of this AD before further flight.
Repeat the detailed inspection thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 50 flight cycles until
the modification required by paragraph (h) of
this AD is done.
(1) For airplanes identified as Group 1 in
Embraer Alert Service Bulletin 145LEG–53–
A032, Revision 01, dated September 24,
2013, on which the actions of Embraer
Service Bulletin 145LEG–53–0021, has been
done: Do the detailed inspection within
3,000 flight cycles after accomplishment of
the actions of Embraer Service Bulletin
145LEG–53–0021, or within 50 flight cycles
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later.
(2) For airplanes identified as Group 2
airplanes in Embraer Alert Service Bulletin
145LEG–53–A032, Revision 01, dated
September 24, 2013: Do the detailed
inspection before the accumulation of 3,000
total flight cycles, or within 50 flight cycles
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later.
(h) Modification
Except as required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, at the applicable time specified in
paragraphs (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, modify
the attaching parts of the lower eyelet fitting
of the cockpit windshield center-post,
including a general visual inspection for any
damage (cracks, dents, scratches) of the
specified lower eyelet fitting, in accordance
with Part II of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Embraer Alert Service
Bulletin 145LEG–53–A032, Revision 01,
dated September 24, 2013. If any damage is
found during the general visual inspection,
before further flight, repair using a method
approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
ˆ
Directorate, FAA; or Agencia Nacional de
Aviacao Civil (ANAC); or ANAC’s authorized
¸˜
Designee. If approved by the ANAC Designee,
the approval must include the Designee’s
authorized signature. Accomplishment of the
modification terminates the repetitive
inspections required by paragraph (g) of this
AD.
(1) For airplanes identified as Group 1 in
Embraer Alert Service Bulletin 145LEG–53–
A032, Revision 01, dated September 24,
2013, on which the actions specified in
Embraer Service Bulletin 145LEG–53–0021,
has been done: Do the modification before
the accumulation of 3,000 flight cycles after
doing the actions specified in Embraer
Service Bulletin 145LEG–53–0021, or within
300 flight cycles after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs later.
(2) For airplanes identified as Group 2 in
Embraer Alert Service Bulletin 145LEG–53–
A032, Revision 01, dated September 24,
2013: Do the modification before the
accumulation of 3,000 total flight cycles, or
within 300 flight cycles after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 166 / Wednesday, August 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
effective date of this AD using Embraer Alert
Service Bulletin 145LEG–53–A032, dated
September 20, 2013, which is not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–1175; fax 425–227–1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
ANAC; or ANAC’s authorized Designee. If
approved by the ANAC Designee, the
approval must include the Designee’s
authorized signature.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Brazilian
Airworthiness Directive 2013–10–02, dated
October 23, 2013, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.
gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-02340002.
(2) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference is
available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Embraer Alert Service Bulletin 145LEG–
53–A032, Revision 01, dated September 24,
2013.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Empresa Brasileira de
Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro
˜
Faria Lima, 2170—Putim—12227–901 Sao
Jose dos Campos—SP—BRASIL; telephone
+55 12 3927–5852 or +55 12 3309–0732; fax
+55 12 3927–7546; email distrib@
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:33 Aug 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
embraer.com.br; Internet https://www.
flyembraer.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://www.archives.
gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
7, 2014.
Victor Wicklund,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–19683 Filed 8–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0258; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–065–AD; Amendment
39–17950; AD 2014–16–26]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dassault
Aviation Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Dassault Aviation Model FALCON
900EX airplanes. This AD was
prompted by our determination to
introduce a corrosion prevention control
program, among other changes, to the
maintenance requirements and
airworthiness limitations. This AD
requires revising the maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
include the maintenance tasks and
airworthiness limitations specified in
the Airworthiness Limitations section of
the airplane maintenance manual. We
are issuing this AD to prevent reduced
structural integrity and reduced
controllability of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
October 1, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of October 1, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://www.
regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA2014-0258 or in person at the Docket
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51077
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet,
P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, NJ
07606; telephone 201–440–6700;
Internet https://www.dassaultfalcon.com.
You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1137;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain Dassault Aviation
Model FALCON 900EX airplanes. The
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on May 2, 2014 (79 FR 25033).
The NPRM was prompted by our
determination to introduce a corrosion
prevention control program, among
other changes, to the maintenance
requirements and airworthiness
limitations. The NPRM proposed to
require revising the maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to
include the maintenance tasks and
airworthiness limitations specified in
the Airworthiness Limitations section of
the airplane maintenance manual. We
are issuing this AD to prevent reduced
structural integrity and reduced
controllability of the airplane.
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013–0051,
dated March 4, 2013 (referred to after
this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for Dassault Aviation Model FALCON
900EX airplanes. The MCAI states:
The airworthiness limitations and
maintenance requirements for the Falcon
900EX type design are included in Dassault
Aviation Aircraft Maintenance Manual
(AMM) chapter 5–40 and are approved by the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).
EASA issued AD 2008–0221 [https://ad.
easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2008_
0221_Corrected.pdf/AD_2008_0221_1] to
require accomplishment of the maintenance
E:\FR\FM\27AUR1.SGM
27AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51074-51077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19683]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2014-0234; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-220-AD;
Amendment 39-17952; AD 2014-16-28 ]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(Embraer)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer) Model EMB-135BJ
airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of failure of the bolts that
connect the cockpit windshield center-post to the forward fuselage.
This AD requires repetitive detailed inspections to detect
discrepancies on the attaching parts of the cockpit windshield center-
post; checking whether the bolts are tightened, if applicable; and
modifying parts, including inspecting for and repairing damage. We are
issuing this AD to prevent failed bolts and failed attaching parts of
the cockpit windshield center-post, which could lead to loss of
structural integrity of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective October 1, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of October 1,
2014.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0234 or in person at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer), Technical Publications
Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170--Putim--12227-901
S[atilde]o Jose dos Campos--SP--BRASIL; telephone +55 12 3927-5852 or
+55 12 3309-0732; fax +55 12 3927-7546; email distrib@embraer.com.br;
Internet https://www.flyembraer.com. You may view this referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1175;
fax 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Empresa Brasileira
de Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer) Model EMB-135BJ airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on April 15, 2014 (79 FR 21160).
The Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC),
which is the aviation authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian
Airworthiness Directive 2013-10-02, dated October 23, 2013 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition certain Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer) Model EMB-135BJ airplanes. The
MCAI states:
This [Brazilian] AD was prompted by reports of failure of the
bolts that connect the lower eyelet fitting of the cockpit
windshield center-post to the forward fuselage. We are issuing this
[Brazilian] AD to detect failed bolts and correct the attaching
parts of the lower eyelet fitting of the cockpit windshield center-
post, which could lead to loss of structural integrity of the
airplane.
Required actions include repetitive detailed inspections for
discrepancies on the attaching parts of the lower eyelet fitting of the
cockpit windshield center-post; a bolt check, if applicable; and
modification of the attaching parts of the lower eyelet fitting of the
cockpit windshield center-post, including a general visual inspection
for damage of the specified lower eyelet fitting and repair of the
damage. The modification would terminate the repetitive detailed
inspections. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0234-0002.
[[Page 51075]]
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (79 FR 21160, April 15,
2014) or on the determination of the cost to the public.
``Contacting the Manufacturer'' Paragraph in This AD
Since late 2006, we have included a standard paragraph titled
``Airworthy Product'' in all MCAI ADs in which the FAA develops an AD
based on a foreign authority's AD.
The MCAI or referenced service information in an FAA AD often
directs the owner/operator to contact the manufacturer for corrective
actions, such as a repair. Briefly, the Airworthy Product paragraph
allowed owners/operators to use corrective actions provided by the
manufacturer if those actions were FAA-approved. In addition, the
paragraph stated that any actions approved by the State of Design
Authority (or its delegated agent) are considered to be FAA-approved.
In the NPRM (79 FR 21160, April 15, 2014), we proposed to prevent
the use of repairs that were not specifically developed to correct the
unsafe condition, by requiring that the repair approval provided by the
State of Design Authority or its delegated agent specifically refer to
this FAA AD. This change was intended to clarify the method of
compliance and to provide operators with better visibility of repairs
that are specifically developed and approved to correct the unsafe
condition. In addition, we proposed to change the phrase ``its
delegated agent'' to include a design approval holder (DAH) with State
of Design Authority design organization approval (DOA), as applicable,
to refer to a DAH authorized to approve required repairs for the
proposed AD.
No comments were provided to the NPRM (79 FR 21160, April 15, 2014)
about these proposed changes. However, a comment was provided for an
NPRM having Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-101-AD (78 FR 78285,
December 26, 2013). The commenter stated the following: ``The proposed
wording, being specific to repairs, eliminates the interpretation that
Airbus messages are acceptable for approving minor deviations
(corrective actions) needed during accomplishment of an AD mandated
Airbus service bulletin.''
This comment has made the FAA aware that some operators have
misunderstood or misinterpreted the Airworthy Product paragraph to
allow the owner/operator to use messages provided by the manufacturer
as approval of deviations during the accomplishment of an AD-mandated
action. The Airworthy Product paragraph does not approve messages or
other information provided by the manufacturer for deviations to the
requirements of the AD-mandated actions. The Airworthy Product
paragraph only addresses the requirement to contact the manufacturer
for corrective actions for the identified unsafe condition and does not
cover deviations from other AD requirements. However, deviations to AD-
required actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17, and anyone may request
the approval for an alternative method of compliance to the AD-required
actions using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
To address this misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the
Airworthy Product paragraph, we have changed that paragraph and
retitled it ``Contacting the Manufacturer.'' This paragraph now
clarifies that for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a
method approved by the FAA, ANAC, or ANAC's authorized Designee.
The Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph also clarifies that, if
approved by the ANAC Designee, the approval must include the Designee's
authorized signature. The Designee signature indicates that the data
and information contained in the document are ANAC-approved, which is
also FAA-approved. Messages and other information provided by the
manufacturer that do not contain the ANAC Designee's authorized
signature approval are not ANAC-approved, unless ANAC directly approves
the manufacturer's message or other information.
This clarification does not remove flexibility previously afforded
by the Airworthy Product paragraph. Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never intended for required actions. This
is also consistent with the recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by identifying those actions in
manufacturers' service instructions that are ``Required for
Compliance'' with ADs. We continue to work with manufacturers to
implement this recommendation. But once we determine that an action is
required, any deviation from the requirement must be approved as an
alternative method of compliance.
Other commenters to the NPRM having Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-
101-AD (78 FR 78285, December 26, 2013) pointed out that in many cases
the foreign manufacturer's service bulletin and the foreign authority's
MCAI might have been issued some time before the FAA AD. Therefore, the
DOA might have provided U.S. operators with an approved repair,
developed with full awareness of the unsafe condition, before the FAA
AD is issued. Under these circumstances, to comply with the FAA AD, the
operator would be required to go back to the manufacturer's DOA and
obtain a new approval document, adding time and expense to the
compliance process with no safety benefit.
Based on these comments, we removed the requirement that the DAH-
provided repair specifically refer to this AD. Before adopting such a
requirement, the FAA will coordinate with affected DAHs and verify they
are prepared to implement means to ensure that their repair approvals
consider the unsafe condition addressed in this AD. Any such
requirements will be adopted through the normal AD rulemaking process,
including notice-and-comment procedures, when appropriate.
We also have decided not to include a generic reference to either
the ``delegated agent'' or ``DAH with State of Design Authority design
organization approval,'' but instead we have provided the specific
delegation approval granted by the State of Design Authority for the
DAH throughout this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described
previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these
minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (79 FR 21160, April 15, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 21160, April 15, 2014).
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 56 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take about 35 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work hour. Required parts would cost about $386 per
product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
[[Page 51076]]
this AD on U.S. operators to be $188,216, or $3,361 per product.
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0234; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2014-16-28 Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer):
Amendment 39-17952. Docket No. FAA-2014-0234; Directorate Identifier
2013-NM-220-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective October 1, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(Embraer) Model EMB-135BJ airplanes, certificated in any category,
as identified in Embraer Alert Service Bulletin 145LEG-53-A032,
Revision 01, dated September 24, 2013.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of failure of the bolts that
connect the cockpit windshield center-post to the forward fuselage.
We are issuing this AD to prevent failed bolts and failed attaching
parts of the cockpit windshield center-post, which could lead to
loss of structural integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Detailed Inspection
At the applicable time specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2)
of this AD, do a detailed inspection to detect discrepancies on the
attaching parts of the lower eyelet fitting of the cockpit
windshield center-post and, if applicable, check whether the bolts
are tightened, in accordance with Part I of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Embraer Alert Service Bulletin 145LEG-53-A032,
Revision 01, dated September 24, 2013. If any discrepancy is found
or if any bolt is not tightened, do the actions specified in
paragraph (h) of this AD before further flight. Repeat the detailed
inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 50 flight cycles
until the modification required by paragraph (h) of this AD is done.
(1) For airplanes identified as Group 1 in Embraer Alert Service
Bulletin 145LEG-53-A032, Revision 01, dated September 24, 2013, on
which the actions of Embraer Service Bulletin 145LEG-53-0021, has
been done: Do the detailed inspection within 3,000 flight cycles
after accomplishment of the actions of Embraer Service Bulletin
145LEG-53-0021, or within 50 flight cycles after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(2) For airplanes identified as Group 2 airplanes in Embraer
Alert Service Bulletin 145LEG-53-A032, Revision 01, dated September
24, 2013: Do the detailed inspection before the accumulation of
3,000 total flight cycles, or within 50 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(h) Modification
Except as required by paragraph (g) of this AD, at the
applicable time specified in paragraphs (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD,
modify the attaching parts of the lower eyelet fitting of the
cockpit windshield center-post, including a general visual
inspection for any damage (cracks, dents, scratches) of the
specified lower eyelet fitting, in accordance with Part II of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Embraer Alert Service Bulletin
145LEG-53-A032, Revision 01, dated September 24, 2013. If any damage
is found during the general visual inspection, before further
flight, repair using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC); or
ANAC's authorized Designee. If approved by the ANAC Designee, the
approval must include the Designee's authorized signature.
Accomplishment of the modification terminates the repetitive
inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(1) For airplanes identified as Group 1 in Embraer Alert Service
Bulletin 145LEG-53-A032, Revision 01, dated September 24, 2013, on
which the actions specified in Embraer Service Bulletin 145LEG-53-
0021, has been done: Do the modification before the accumulation of
3,000 flight cycles after doing the actions specified in Embraer
Service Bulletin 145LEG-53-0021, or within 300 flight cycles after
the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(2) For airplanes identified as Group 2 in Embraer Alert Service
Bulletin 145LEG-53-A032, Revision 01, dated September 24, 2013: Do
the modification before the accumulation of 3,000 total flight
cycles, or within 300 flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the
[[Page 51077]]
effective date of this AD using Embraer Alert Service Bulletin
145LEG-53-A032, dated September 20, 2013, which is not incorporated
by reference in this AD.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Branch, send it to ATTN: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1175;
fax 425-227-1149. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or ANAC; or
ANAC's authorized Designee. If approved by the ANAC Designee, the
approval must include the Designee's authorized signature.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2013-10-02, dated October
23, 2013, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0234-0002.
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Embraer Alert Service Bulletin 145LEG-53-A032, Revision 01,
dated September 24, 2013.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170--
Putim--12227-901 S[atilde]o Jose dos Campos--SP--BRASIL; telephone
+55 12 3927-5852 or +55 12 3309-0732; fax +55 12 3927-7546; email
distrib@embraer.com.br; Internet https://www.flyembraer.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 7, 2014.
Victor Wicklund,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-19683 Filed 8-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P