Controlled Substances: Adjustment to the Established 2014 Aggregate Production Quota for Marijuana, 50944-50945 [2014-20317]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
50944
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 165 / Tuesday, August 26, 2014 / Notices
chilled taro is provided for in HTS
subheading 0714.40.10, while fresh or
chilled dasheens are provided for in
HTS subheading 0714.90.10. As part of
this investigation, the Commission
intends to consider whether it is
necessary or appropriate to recommend
to the President that one of the two
subheadings be deleted from the HTS.
The second additional possible
modification relates to the HTS
nomenclature for corned beef, which is
provided for in HTS subheading
1602.50.10. The superior subheading to
subheading 1602.50.10 provides for
certain meat of bovine animals that is
not cured. However, corned beef is a
cured meat product. As part of this
investigation, the Commission intends
to consider whether it is necessary or
appropriate to recommend to the
President that the HTS be modified to
provide for corned beef under a superior
subheading for cured meat of bovine
animals.
An up-to-date copy of the HTS, which
incorporates the Harmonized System in
its overall structure, can be found on the
Commission Web site at www.usitc.gov.
Hard copies and electronic copies on CD
can be found at many of the 1,400
Federal Depository Libraries located
throughout the United States and its
territories; further information about
these locations can be found at
www.gpoaccess.gov or by contacting
GPO Access by telephone at (866) 512–
1800.
Proposed Recommendations,
Opportunity To Comment: In preparing
its recommended modifications, the
Commission will first prepare proposed
recommendations and provide
opportunity to interested Federal
agencies and the public to present their
views in writing on those proposed
recommendations. The Commission
expects to publish the proposed
recommendations on its Web site in
December 2014, and will publish a
notice in the Federal Register at that
time providing notice of their
availability and the procedures for filing
written views, including the date by
which such written views must be filed.
To assist the public in understanding
the proposed changes and in developing
comments, the Commission will
include, with the proposed
recommendations and in its report to
the President, a non-authoritative crossreference table linking the proposed
tariff codes to the corresponding current
tariff codes. Persons using the
successive versions of this table should
be aware that the cross-references
shown are subject to change during the
course of the investigation.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:48 Aug 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
Recommendations to the President:
The Commission will submit its
recommended modifications to the
President in the form of a report that
will include a summary of the
information on which the
recommendations were based, together
with a statement of the probable
economic effect of each recommended
change on any industry in the United
States. The report also will include a
copy of all written views submitted by
interested Federal agencies and a copy
or summary, prepared by the
Commission, of the views of all other
interested parties. The Commission
expects to submit that report in July
2015.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 20, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–20175 Filed 8–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. DEA–378]
Controlled Substances: Adjustment to
the Established 2014 Aggregate
Production Quota for Marijuana
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice addresses a
comment received as a result of a notice
with request for comments published
May 5, 2014, adjusting the established
2014 aggregate production quota for
marijuana, a schedule I controlled
substance under the Controlled
Substances Act.
DATES: Effective August 26, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Imelda L. Paredes, Office of Diversion
Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152, Telephone: (202) 598–6812.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Legal Authority
The Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) implements and
enforces titles II and III of the
Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention
and Control Act of 1970, as amended.
Titles II and III are referred to as the
‘‘Controlled Substances Act’’ and the
‘‘Controlled Substances Import and
Export Act,’’ respectively, and are
collectively referred to as the
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
‘‘Controlled Substances Act’’ or the
‘‘CSA’’ for the purpose of this action. 21
U.S.C. 801–971. The DEA publishes the
implementing regulations for these
statutes in title 21 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), parts 1300 to 1321.
The CSA and its implementing
regulations are designed to prevent,
detect, and eliminate the diversion of
controlled substances and listed
chemicals into the illicit market while
providing for the legitimate medical,
scientific, research, and industrial needs
of the United States. Controlled
substances have the potential for abuse
and dependence and are controlled to
protect the public health and safety.
Section 306 of the CSA (21 U.S.C.
826) requires the Attorney General to
establish aggregate production quotas
for each basic class of controlled
substance listed in schedules I and II
each year. The Attorney General has
delegated this authority under 21 U.S.C.
826 to the Administrator of the DEA, 28
CFR 0.100.
Background
The DEA established the initial 2014
aggregate production quotas and
assessments for annual need on
September 9, 2013 (78 FR 55099). The
notice stipulated that, as provided for in
21 CFR 1303.13, all aggregate
production quotas and assessments for
annual need are subject to adjustment.
On May 5, 2014, a notice titled,
‘‘Controlled Substances: Adjustment to
the Established 2014 Aggregate
Production Quota for Marijuana,’’ was
published in the Federal Register (79
FR 55099). That notice adjusted the
established 2014 aggregate production
quota for marijuana for reasons stated
therein. All interested persons were
invited to comment on or object to the
adjusted 2014 aggregate production
quota for marijuana on or before June 4,
2014.
Comments Received
The DEA received one comment on
the notice with request for comments.
The commenter supported the adjusted
2014 aggregate production quota for
marijuana. The DEA appreciates the
support for this adjusted 2014 aggregate
production quota for marijuana which
will provide for the estimated scientific,
research, and industrial needs of the
United States.
Determination for Adjusting the
Established 2014 Aggregate Production
Quota for Marijuana
The DEA has taken into consideration
the one comment received during the
30-day period and the Administrator
has determined, pursuant to Section 306
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
50945
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 165 / Tuesday, August 26, 2014 / Notices
of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 826), based on all
of the above, and for the reasons stated
in the May 5, 2014, notice, that the
adjusted established 2014 aggregate
production quota for marijuana to be
manufactured in the United States in
2014 to provide for the estimated
scientific, research, and industrial needs
of the United States, and the
establishment and maintenance of
reserve stocks, expressed in grams of
anhydrous acid or base, shall remain as
follows:
Previously
established
2014 quota
Basic class-schedule I
Marijuana .................................................................................................................................................................
Dated: August 20, 2014.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014–20317 Filed 8–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Richard C. Quigley, D.O.; Decision and
Order
On November 13, 2013, I, the Deputy
Administrator, Drug Enforcement
Administration, issued an Order to
Show Cause and Immediate Suspension
of Registration (hereinafter OTSC/ISO or
Order) to Richard C. Quigley, D.O.
(Registrant), of Oscoda, Michigan. The
Order, which also sought the revocation
of Registrant’s DEA Certificate of
Registration and the denial of any
pending applications to renew or
modify his registration, alleged, inter
alia, that on ten occasions between June
6 and August 30, 2013, Registrant
prescribed schedule III controlled
substances combining hydrocodone and
acetaminophen, to four undercover law
enforcement officers, without
‘‘conduct[ing] a physical examination or
properly assess[ing] the needs of [the]
individual[s] for controlled substances.’’
Id. at 2–3. The Order thus alleged that
Registrant acted outside of the usual
course of professional practice and
lacked a legitimate medical purpose in
issuing the prescriptions and thus
violated both federal and state law. Id.
(citing 21 CFR 1306.04(a); Mich. Comp.
Laws sections 333.7333; 333.7405).1
Based on ‘‘the egregious and repeated
nature of [his] misconduct,’’ the Order
further concluded that Registrant’s
‘‘continued registration during the
pendency of these proceedings would
constitute an imminent danger to the
public health or safety.’’ Id. at 4.
Accordingly, I ordered that Registrant’s
1 The Show Cause Order also notified Registrant
of his right to request a hearing on the allegations
or to submit a written statement in lieu of a hearing,
the procedure for electing either option, and the
consequence for failing to do either. GX 1, at 5
(citing 21 CFR 1301.43(a), (c), (d)–(e)).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:48 Aug 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
registration be immediately suspended.
Id.
On November 18, 2013, a DEA
Diversion Investigator (DI) attempted to
serve the OTSC/ISO on Registrant. GX 2,
at 2. However, she ‘‘discovered that
[Registrant] had abandoned his practice,
pulled his children out of school, and
fled . . . to Canada.’’ Id. Upon inquiring
with U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, the DI determined that
Registrant ‘‘and his family entered
Canada on September 26, 2013’’ and
had not returned to the United States.
Id. at 2–3.
Simultaneously with the DI’s attempt
to effect service, on November 18, 2013,
a Legal Assistant with the Office of
Chief Counsel mailed the OTSC/ISO to
Registrant, at the mailing address he had
previously provided the Agency, by
certified mail, return receipt requested.
GX 8. On November 21, 2013, the legal
assistant queried the U.S. Postal
Service’s Track and Confirm’’ Web page;
the Web page stated: ‘‘Moved, Left No
Address.’’ Id. Thereafter, on November
29, the mailing was returned to the
Office of Chief Counsel. Id.
On December 2, 2013, the Legal
Assistant re-mailed the OTSC/ISO to
Registrant by First Class Mail to the
same address. Id. However, on
December 11, 2013, the mailing was
returned bearing a label which read:
‘‘MOVED LEFT NO ADDRESS,
UNABLE TO FORWARD, RETURN TO
SENDER.’’ Id.
Concurrently with her attempts to
effect service by mail, on November 20,
the Legal Assistant emailed the OTSC–
ISO to Registrant at the contact email
address he had previously provided to
the Agency’s Registrant Information
Consolidated System (RICS). Id. at 2.
According to the Legal Assistant, she
‘‘received notification from my email
program that delivery to the recipient
was complete. I did not receive any
error message that indicated that the
email was not delivered.’’ Id.
Based on the above, I find that the
Government has complied with its
constitutional obligation to ‘‘to provide
‘notice reasonably calculated, under all
the circumstances, to apprise interested
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21,000 g
Adjusted 2014
quota
650,000 g
parties of the pendency of the action
and afford them an opportunity to
present their objections.’ ’’ Jones v.
Flowers, 547 U.S. 220, 226 (2006)
(quoting Mullane v. Central Hanover
Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314
(1950)). Moreover, ‘‘ ‘when notice is a
person’s due . . . [t]he means employed
must be such as one desirous of actually
informing the absentee might reasonably
adopt to accomplish it.’ ’’ Jones, 547
U.S. at 229 (quoting Mullane, 339 U.S.
at 315).
Here, while the Government’s efforts
to effect service by both hand delivery
and mail were not effective, several
courts have held that the emailing of
process can, depending on the facts and
circumstances, satisfy due process,
especially where service by
conventional means is impracticable
because a person secretes himself. See
Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio Int’l Interlink,
284 F.3d 1007, 1017–18 (9th Cir. 2002);
Snyder, et al. v. Alternate Energy Inc.,
857 N.Y.S. 2d 442, 447–449 (N.Y. Civ.
Ct. 2008); In re International Telemedia
Associates, Inc., 245 B.R. 713, 721–22
(Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2000). To be sure,
courts have recognized that the use of
email to serve process has ‘‘its
limitations,’’ including that ‘‘[i]n most
instances, there is no way to confirm
receipt of an email message.’’ Rio
Properties, 284 F.3d at 1018.
Due process does not, however,
require actual notice, Jones, 547 U.S. at
226 (quoting Dusenberry, 534 U.S. 161,
170 (2002)), but rather, only ‘‘ ‘notice
reasonably calculated, under all the
circumstances, to apprise interested
parties of the pendency of the action
and afford them an opportunity to
present their objections.’ ’’ Id. (quoting
Mullane, 339 U.S. at 314). Here, I
conclude that because the Government’s
use of traditional means of service was
rendered futile by Registrant’s having
fled the United States, the use of email
to effect service at an email address he
had previously provided the Agency
was ‘‘reasonably calculated . . . to
apprise [Registrant] of the pendency of
the action’’ where the Government did
not receive back either an error or
undeliverable message. See Emilio
E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM
26AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50944-50945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20317]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. DEA-378]
Controlled Substances: Adjustment to the Established 2014
Aggregate Production Quota for Marijuana
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice addresses a comment received as a result of a
notice with request for comments published May 5, 2014, adjusting the
established 2014 aggregate production quota for marijuana, a schedule I
controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act.
DATES: Effective August 26, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Imelda L. Paredes, Office of Diversion
Control, Drug Enforcement Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152, Telephone: (202) 598-
6812.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Legal Authority
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) implements and enforces
titles II and III of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and
Control Act of 1970, as amended. Titles II and III are referred to as
the ``Controlled Substances Act'' and the ``Controlled Substances
Import and Export Act,'' respectively, and are collectively referred to
as the ``Controlled Substances Act'' or the ``CSA'' for the purpose of
this action. 21 U.S.C. 801-971. The DEA publishes the implementing
regulations for these statutes in title 21 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), parts 1300 to 1321. The CSA and its implementing
regulations are designed to prevent, detect, and eliminate the
diversion of controlled substances and listed chemicals into the
illicit market while providing for the legitimate medical, scientific,
research, and industrial needs of the United States. Controlled
substances have the potential for abuse and dependence and are
controlled to protect the public health and safety.
Section 306 of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 826) requires the Attorney
General to establish aggregate production quotas for each basic class
of controlled substance listed in schedules I and II each year. The
Attorney General has delegated this authority under 21 U.S.C. 826 to
the Administrator of the DEA, 28 CFR 0.100.
Background
The DEA established the initial 2014 aggregate production quotas
and assessments for annual need on September 9, 2013 (78 FR 55099). The
notice stipulated that, as provided for in 21 CFR 1303.13, all
aggregate production quotas and assessments for annual need are subject
to adjustment. On May 5, 2014, a notice titled, ``Controlled
Substances: Adjustment to the Established 2014 Aggregate Production
Quota for Marijuana,'' was published in the Federal Register (79 FR
55099). That notice adjusted the established 2014 aggregate production
quota for marijuana for reasons stated therein. All interested persons
were invited to comment on or object to the adjusted 2014 aggregate
production quota for marijuana on or before June 4, 2014.
Comments Received
The DEA received one comment on the notice with request for
comments. The commenter supported the adjusted 2014 aggregate
production quota for marijuana. The DEA appreciates the support for
this adjusted 2014 aggregate production quota for marijuana which will
provide for the estimated scientific, research, and industrial needs of
the United States.
Determination for Adjusting the Established 2014 Aggregate Production
Quota for Marijuana
The DEA has taken into consideration the one comment received
during the 30-day period and the Administrator has determined, pursuant
to Section 306
[[Page 50945]]
of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 826), based on all of the above, and for the
reasons stated in the May 5, 2014, notice, that the adjusted
established 2014 aggregate production quota for marijuana to be
manufactured in the United States in 2014 to provide for the estimated
scientific, research, and industrial needs of the United States, and
the establishment and maintenance of reserve stocks, expressed in grams
of anhydrous acid or base, shall remain as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Previously
Basic class-schedule I established Adjusted 2014
2014 quota quota
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marijuana............................... 21,000 g 650,000 g
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: August 20, 2014.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-20317 Filed 8-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P