Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Submitted Fine Particulate Maintenance Plan for Yuba City-Marysville; California, 50646-50647 [2014-20192]

Download as PDF 50646 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 164 / Monday, August 25, 2014 / Notices commodity and capacity for receipt and delivery points across multiple pipeline systems. This meeting is open to the public and all interested parties, including those in the electric power and financial sectors, are invited to attend. There is no registration fee to attend and this meeting will not be Web cast or transcribed. Meeting attendees are reminded to allow sufficient time to pass through building security procedures. Persons wishing to participate and speak at this meeting should express such interest no later than September 4, 2014 by contacting Jason Stanek, Legal Advisor to the Commissioner at (202) 502–8403, or by email at jason.stanek@ferc.gov. Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accommodations, please send an email to accessibility@ferc.gov or call toll free 1–866–208–3372 (voice) or (202) 502– 8659 (TTY), or send a facsimile to (202) 208–2106 noting the accommodations required. Dated: August 19, 2014. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–20127 Filed 8–22–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. CP14–531–000] emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc.; Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization Take notice that on August 7, 2014, Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc. (Southern Star), 4700 State Highway 56, Owensboro, Kentucky 42301, filed in the above Docket, a prior notice request pursuant to section 157.210 of the Commission’s regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to increase the capacity along mainline facilities from its Marionville/Billings TB area on Line HQ to an existing delivery meter known as Summit Rogersville located in Greene County, Missouri, all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection. The filing may also be viewed on the web at http:// www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:31 Aug 22, 2014 Jkt 232001 assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at FERCOnlineSupport@ ferc.gov or toll free at (866) 208–3676, or TTY, contact (202) 502–8659. Any questions concerning this application may be directed to David N. Roberts, Analyst Staff, Regulatory Compliance, Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc., 4700 State Highway 56, Owensboro, Kentucky 42301, at (270) 852–4654. Specifically, Southern Star’s proposed increase in capacity, of 4,000 Mcf/d on a portion of its 16-inch Line HQ, will require yard piping modifications upstream within the existing Saginaw and Grabham Compressor Stations. The estimated cost of the project is $423,000. Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission’s rules, 18 CFR 157.9, within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either: Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the Commission’s public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff’s issuance of the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission’s public record for this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal thorizations within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission staff’s FEIS or EA. Any person may, within 60 days after the issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of intervention. Any person filing to intervene or the Commission’s staff may, pursuant to section 157.205 of the Commission’s Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) (18 CFR 157.205) file a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time allowed for protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant to section 7 of the NGA. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, protests, and interventions via the internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Commission’s Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link. Dated: August 18, 2014. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–20061 Filed 8–22–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0484; FRL–9915–66– Region–9] Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Submitted Fine Particulate Maintenance Plan for Yuba City-Marysville; California Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Notice of adequacy. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is notifying the public that the Agency has found that the motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for fine particulate (PM2.5) for the years 2017 and 2024 in the Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 Nonattainment Area Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan (April 1, 2013) (‘‘Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 Plan’’) are adequate for transportation conformity purposes. The Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 Plan was submitted to EPA on May 23, 2013 by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) as a revision to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) and includes a maintenance plan for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 national ambient air quality standard. Upon the effective date of this notice of adequacy, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments and the U.S. Department of Transportation must use the MVEBs for future conformity determinations. DATES: This finding is effective on September 9, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Ungvarsky, U.S. EPA, Region IX, Air Division AIR–2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901, (415) 972–3963 or ungvarsky.john@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean EPA. This notice is simply an announcement of a finding that we have already made. EPA Region IX sent a letter to CARB on August 11, 2014 stating that the MVEBs in the submitted Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 Plan for 2017 and 2024 are adequate. The adequate MVEBs are provided in the following table: SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM 25AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 164 / Monday, August 25, 2014 / Notices FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [Tons per winter season day] Budget year 2017 .................. 2024 .................. PM2.5 0.2 0.2 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: August 11, 2014. Alexis Strauss, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 2014–20192 Filed 8–22–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 17:31 Aug 22, 2014 [FR Doc. 2014–20093 Filed 8–22–14; 8:45 am] Federal Communications Commission. BILLING CODE 6712–01–P AGENCY: 5.3 3.1 Receipt of the MVEBs in the Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 Plan was announced on EPA’s transportation conformity Web site on May 20, 2014. We received no comments in response to the adequacy review posting. The finding is available at EPA’s transportation conformity Web site: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/ stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm. Transportation conformity is required by Clean Air Act section 176(c). EPA’s conformity rule requires that transportation plans, transportation improvement programs, and projects conform to SIPs and establishes the criteria and procedures for determining whether or not they do conform. Conformity to a SIP means that transportation activities will not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standards. The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP’s MVEBs are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4) which was promulgated in our August 15, 1997 final rule (62 FR 43780, 43781–43783). We have further described our process for determining the adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in our July 1, 2004 final rule (69 FR 40004, 40038), and we used the information in these resources in making our adequacy determination. Please note that an adequacy review is separate from EPA’s completeness review, and should not be used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate approval action for the SIP. Even if we find a budget adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved. VerDate Mar<15>2010 Federal Communications Commission. Gloria J. Miles, Federal Register Liaison. Federal Advisory Committee Act; Technological Advisory Council MVEBS IN THE YUBA CITYMARYSVILLE PM2.5 PLAN Oxides of nitrogen 50647 Jkt 232001 ACTION: Notice of public meeting. In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, this notice advises interested persons that the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Technological Advisory Council will hold a meeting on Tuesday, September 23rd, 2014 in the Commission Meeting Room, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. at the Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. SUMMARY: DATES: Tuesday September 23rd, 2014. Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Walter Johnston, Chief, Electromagnetic Compatibility Division, 202–418–0807; Walter.Johnston@FCC.gov. The FCC Technological Advisory Council will discuss progress on its work program for 2014. The FCC will attempt to accommodate as many people as possible. However, admittance will be limited to seating availability. Meetings are also broadcast live with open captioning over the Internet from the FCC Live Web page at http:// www.fcc.gov/live/. The public may submit written comments before the meeting to: Walter Johnston, the FCC’s Designated Federal Officer for Technological Advisory Council by email: Walter.Johnston@fcc.gov or U.S. Postal Service Mail (Walter Johnston, Federal Communications Commission, Room 7–A224, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554). Open captioning will be provided for this event. Other reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities are available upon request. Requests for such accommodations should be submitted via email to fcc504@fcc.gov or by calling the Office of Engineering and Technology at 202– 418–2470 (voice), (202) 418–1944 (fax). Such requests should include a detailed description of the accommodation needed. In addition, please include your contact information. Please allow at least five days advance notice; last minute requests will be accepted, but may be impossible to fill. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [OMB Control No. 9000–0164; Docket 2014– 0055; Sequence 23] Federal Acquisition Regulation; Submission to OMB Review; Contractor Business Ethics Compliance Program and Disclosure Requirements Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding an extension to an existing OMB information collection. AGENCY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB) will be submitting to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve an extension of a previously approved information collection requirement concerning Contractor Business Ethics Compliance Program and Disclosure Requirements. A notice was published in the Federal Register at 79 FR 32959 on June 9, 2014. No comments were received. SUMMARY: Submit comments on or before September 24, 2014. ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by Information Collection 9000–0164, Contractor Business Ethics Compliance Program and Disclosure Requirements, by any of the following methods: • Regulations.gov: http:// www.regulations.gov. Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching the OMB control number 9000–0164. Select the link that corresponds with ‘‘Information Collection 9000–0164, Contractor Business Ethics Compliance Program and Disclosure Requirements’’. Follow the instructions provided on the screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and ‘‘Information Collection 9000–0164, Contractor Business Ethics Compliance Program DATES: E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM 25AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50646-50647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20192]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0484; FRL-9915-66-Region-9]


Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Submitted 
Fine Particulate Maintenance Plan for Yuba City-Marysville; California

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of adequacy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is notifying the 
public that the Agency has found that the motor vehicle emissions 
budgets (MVEBs) for fine particulate (PM2.5) for the years 
2017 and 2024 in the Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 
Nonattainment Area Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan (April 1, 
2013) (``Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 Plan'') are adequate for 
transportation conformity purposes. The Yuba City-Marysville 
PM2.5 Plan was submitted to EPA on May 23, 2013 by the 
California Air Resources Board (CARB) as a revision to the California 
State Implementation Plan (SIP) and includes a maintenance plan for the 
2006 24-hour PM2.5 national ambient air quality standard. 
Upon the effective date of this notice of adequacy, the Sacramento Area 
Council of Governments and the U.S. Department of Transportation must 
use the MVEBs for future conformity determinations.

DATES: This finding is effective on September 9, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Ungvarsky, U.S. EPA, Region IX, 
Air Division AIR-2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901, 
(415) 972-3963 or ungvarsky.john@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
    This notice is simply an announcement of a finding that we have 
already made. EPA Region IX sent a letter to CARB on August 11, 2014 
stating that the MVEBs in the submitted Yuba City-Marysville 
PM2.5 Plan for 2017 and 2024 are adequate. The adequate 
MVEBs are provided in the following table:

[[Page 50647]]



              MVEBs in the Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 Plan
                      [Tons per winter season day]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Oxides of
                  Budget year                     nitrogen      PM2.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2017..........................................          5.3          0.2
2024..........................................          3.1          0.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Receipt of the MVEBs in the Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 
Plan was announced on EPA's transportation conformity Web site on May 
20, 2014. We received no comments in response to the adequacy review 
posting. The finding is available at EPA's transportation conformity 
Web site: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm.
    Transportation conformity is required by Clean Air Act section 
176(c). EPA's conformity rule requires that transportation plans, 
transportation improvement programs, and projects conform to SIPs and 
establishes the criteria and procedures for determining whether or not 
they do conform. Conformity to a SIP means that transportation 
activities will not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing 
violations, or delay timely attainment of the national ambient air 
quality standards.
    The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's MVEBs are 
adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4) 
which was promulgated in our August 15, 1997 final rule (62 FR 43780, 
43781-43783). We have further described our process for determining the 
adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in our July 1, 2004 final rule (69 FR 
40004, 40038), and we used the information in these resources in making 
our adequacy determination. Please note that an adequacy review is 
separate from EPA's completeness review, and should not be used to 
prejudge EPA's ultimate approval action for the SIP. Even if we find a 
budget adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: August 11, 2014.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2014-20192 Filed 8-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P