Agency Information Collection Activities, Request for Comment, 50726-50727 [2014-20056]
Download as PDF
50726
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 164 / Monday, August 25, 2014 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
reasons. First, the specific type of
activity being excluded does not
generate transaction fee revenue for the
Exchange as Customers are charge a rate
of $0.00 per contract. As a result, the
Customers who are engaging in the
activity—Customer to Customer
Electronic Complex Order executions—
are not being charged transaction fees.
The Exchange believes it is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to refrain from paying a
rebate for activity that is already free for
the participants involved. The Exchange
also believes that the proposal is
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory because it applies to all
Customers equally. Finally, because the
rebate only applies to Customer activity,
the elimination of the rebate as
proposed puts Customers on the same
competitive footing for the excluded
orders as other market participants, and
therefore is reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory.
With respect to the proposed fee being
applicable to the balance of August
2014, the Exchange believes the fee is
reasonable because Customers are on
notice of the proposed fee and the rebate
would be based only on the volume
executed during the remaining trading
days of August.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange believes the proposed fee
change is reasonably designed to be fair
and equitable, and therefore, will not
unduly burden any particular group of
market participants trading on the
`
Exchange vis-a-vis another group. The
Exchange notes that the rebate only
applies to Customers and therefore the
elimination of the rebate in the
described situation puts Customers on
the same competitive footing as other
market participants. As such, no market
participant would be entitled to a credit
for these types of transactions. As noted
above, the proposed fee change applies
equally to all Customers, thus the
proposed fee change does not pose an
undue burden among Customers. The
Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on intermarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because the proposed change only
applies to trading on the Exchange.
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market, comprised of many
options exchanges, in which market
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
participants can easily and readily
direct order flow to competing venues if
they deem fee levels at a particular
venue to be excessive or rebates to be
inadequate. Accordingly, the fees that
are assessed and the rebates paid by the
Exchange described in the above
proposal are influenced by these robust
market forces and therefore must remain
competitive with fees charged and
rebates paid by other venues and
therefore must continue to be reasonable
and equitably allocated to those ATP
Holders that opt to direct orders to the
Exchange rather than competing venues.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 8 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 9
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 10 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2014–67 on the subject line.
8 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEMKT–2014–67. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2014–67, and should be
submitted on or before September 15,
2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–20081 Filed 8–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL
Agency Information Collection
Activities, Request for Comment
Office of Special Counsel.
Second Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the U.S. Office of
Special Counsel (OSC), plans to request
SUMMARY:
9 17
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
11 17
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
25AUN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 164 / Monday, August 25, 2014 / Notices
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for use of an
expanded version of an approved
information collection consisting of an
electronic customer survey form. OSC is
required by law to conduct an annual
survey of those who seek its assistance.
The information collection is used to
carry out that mandate. However, the
additional questions for the survey
cover a category of complaint,
whistleblower disclosures, whose
inclusion in the survey is not statutorily
required, but rather is being done
voluntarily by our agency. The 6
specific questions to be added are: ‘‘Did
the agency against which you filed the
disclosure inform you about your right
to make whistleblower disclosures, and
the channels for making such
disclosures?’’ ‘‘Did you obtain the action
that you wanted from OSC?’’ ‘‘What
reason did OSC give for closing your
disclosure matter?’’ (Check all that
apply.)’’ ‘‘Did you agree with the reason
OSC gave for closing your disclosure
matter?’’ ‘‘If you answered ‘‘no’’ to the
question in number 4 above, could you
please elaborate? [below which is a free
field text box].’’ ‘‘How would you rate
the service provided by OSC in each of
the following areas?’’ The current OMB
approval for this collection of
information [without the new questions
for the Disclosure Unit] does not expire
until 10/31/2015.
Current and former Federal
employees, employee representatives,
other Federal agencies, state and local
government employees, and the general
public are invited for a second time to
comment on this information collection.
Comments are invited on: (a) whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of OSC functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of OSC’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collections of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Comments should be received by
September xx, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl
Kammann, Director of Finance, at 1730
M St. NW., Suite 300, Washington, DC
20036, or by facsimile at (202) 254–
3711.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSC is an
independent agency responsible for,
among other things, (1) investigation of
allegations of prohibited personnel
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
practices defined by law at 5 U.S.C.
2302(b), protection of whistleblowers,
and certain other illegal employment
practices under titles 5 and 38 of the
U.S. Code, affecting current or former
Federal employees or applicants for
employment, and covered state and
local government employees; and (2) the
interpretation and enforcement of Hatch
Act provisions on political activity in
chapters 15 and 73 of title 5 of the U.S.
Code, and implementing regulations
concerning the controlling of paperwork
burdens on the public, found at 5 CFR
part 1320.
Title of Collection: Office of Special
Counsel (OSC) Annual Survey; OMB
Control Number 3255–0003.
OSC is required to conduct an annual
survey of individuals who seek its
assistance. Section 13 of 103 (1994),
codified at 5 U.S.C. 1212 note, states, in
part: ‘‘[T]he survey shall—(1) Determine
if the individual seeking assistance was
fully apprised of their rights; (2)
determine whether the individual was
successful either at the Office of Special
Counsel or the Merit Systems Protection
Board; and (3) determine if the
individual, whether successful or not,
was satisfied with the treatment
received from the Office of Special
Counsel.’’ The same section also
provides that survey results are to be
published in OSC’s annual report to
Congress. Copies of prior years’ annual
reports are available on OSC’s Web site,
at https://www.osc.gov/RR_
AnnualReportsToCongress.htm or by
calling OSC at (202) 254–3600.
The survey form for the collection of
information is available for review by
calling OSC at (202) 254–3600.
Affected Public: Current and former
Federal employees, applicants for
Federal employment, state and local
government employees, and their
representatives, and the general public.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Estimated Annual Number of Survey
Form Respondents: 415.
Frequency of Survey Form Use:
Annual.
Estimated Average Amount of Time
for a Person To Respond to Survey: 12
minutes.
Estimated Annual Survey Burden: 141
hours.
This survey form is used to survey
current and former Federal employees
and applicants for Federal employment
who have submitted allegations of
possible prohibited personnel practices
or other prohibited activity for
investigation and possible prosecution
by OSC, and whose matter has been
closed or otherwise resolved during the
prior fiscal year, on their experience at
OSC. Specifically, the survey asks
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50727
questions relating to whether the
respondent was: (1) Apprised of his or
her rights; (2) successful at the OSC or
at the Merit Systems Protection Board;
and (3) satisfied with the treatment
received at the OSC.
Dated: August 18, 2014.
Carolyn N. Lerner,
Special Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014–20056 Filed 8–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7405–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 8845]
Culturally Significant Objects Imported
for Exhibition Determinations:
‘‘Bartholomeus Spranger: Splendor
and Eroticism in Imperial Prague’’
Exhibition
Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March
27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority
No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as
appropriate, Delegation of Authority No.
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby
determine that the objects to be
included in the exhibition
‘‘Bartholomeus Spranger: Splendor and
Eroticism in Imperial Prague,’’ imported
from abroad for temporary exhibition
within the United States, are of cultural
significance. The objects are imported
pursuant to loan agreements with the
foreign owners or custodians. I also
determine that the exhibition or display
of the exhibit objects at The
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York,
NY, from on or about November 4, 2014,
until on or about February 1, 2015, and
at possible additional exhibitions or
venues yet to be determined, is in the
national interest. I have ordered that
Public Notice of these Determinations
be published in the Federal Register.
SUMMARY:
For
further information, including a list of
the exhibit objects, contact Julie
Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of
the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of
State (telephone: 202–632–6467). The
mailing address is U.S. Department of
State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite
5H03), Washington, DC 20522–0505.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50726-50727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20056]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL
Agency Information Collection Activities, Request for Comment
AGENCY: Office of Special Counsel.
ACTION: Second Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC), plans to
request
[[Page 50727]]
approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for use of an
expanded version of an approved information collection consisting of an
electronic customer survey form. OSC is required by law to conduct an
annual survey of those who seek its assistance. The information
collection is used to carry out that mandate. However, the additional
questions for the survey cover a category of complaint, whistleblower
disclosures, whose inclusion in the survey is not statutorily required,
but rather is being done voluntarily by our agency. The 6 specific
questions to be added are: ``Did the agency against which you filed the
disclosure inform you about your right to make whistleblower
disclosures, and the channels for making such disclosures?'' ``Did you
obtain the action that you wanted from OSC?'' ``What reason did OSC
give for closing your disclosure matter?'' (Check all that apply.)''
``Did you agree with the reason OSC gave for closing your disclosure
matter?'' ``If you answered ``no'' to the question in number 4 above,
could you please elaborate? [below which is a free field text box].''
``How would you rate the service provided by OSC in each of the
following areas?'' The current OMB approval for this collection of
information [without the new questions for the Disclosure Unit] does
not expire until 10/31/2015.
Current and former Federal employees, employee representatives,
other Federal agencies, state and local government employees, and the
general public are invited for a second time to comment on this
information collection. Comments are invited on: (a) whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of OSC functions, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of OSC's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collections of information; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
DATES: Comments should be received by September xx, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Kammann, Director of Finance, at
1730 M St. NW., Suite 300, Washington, DC 20036, or by facsimile at
(202) 254-3711.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSC is an independent agency responsible
for, among other things, (1) investigation of allegations of prohibited
personnel practices defined by law at 5 U.S.C. 2302(b), protection of
whistleblowers, and certain other illegal employment practices under
titles 5 and 38 of the U.S. Code, affecting current or former Federal
employees or applicants for employment, and covered state and local
government employees; and (2) the interpretation and enforcement of
Hatch Act provisions on political activity in chapters 15 and 73 of
title 5 of the U.S. Code, and implementing regulations concerning the
controlling of paperwork burdens on the public, found at 5 CFR part
1320.
Title of Collection: Office of Special Counsel (OSC) Annual Survey;
OMB Control Number 3255-0003.
OSC is required to conduct an annual survey of individuals who seek
its assistance. Section 13 of 103 (1994), codified at 5 U.S.C. 1212
note, states, in part: ``[T]he survey shall--(1) Determine if the
individual seeking assistance was fully apprised of their rights; (2)
determine whether the individual was successful either at the Office of
Special Counsel or the Merit Systems Protection Board; and (3)
determine if the individual, whether successful or not, was satisfied
with the treatment received from the Office of Special Counsel.'' The
same section also provides that survey results are to be published in
OSC's annual report to Congress. Copies of prior years' annual reports
are available on OSC's Web site, at https://www.osc.gov/RR_AnnualReportsToCongress.htm or by calling OSC at (202) 254-3600.
The survey form for the collection of information is available for
review by calling OSC at (202) 254-3600.
Affected Public: Current and former Federal employees, applicants
for Federal employment, state and local government employees, and their
representatives, and the general public.
Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
Estimated Annual Number of Survey Form Respondents: 415.
Frequency of Survey Form Use: Annual.
Estimated Average Amount of Time for a Person To Respond to Survey:
12 minutes.
Estimated Annual Survey Burden: 141 hours.
This survey form is used to survey current and former Federal
employees and applicants for Federal employment who have submitted
allegations of possible prohibited personnel practices or other
prohibited activity for investigation and possible prosecution by OSC,
and whose matter has been closed or otherwise resolved during the prior
fiscal year, on their experience at OSC. Specifically, the survey asks
questions relating to whether the respondent was: (1) Apprised of his
or her rights; (2) successful at the OSC or at the Merit Systems
Protection Board; and (3) satisfied with the treatment received at the
OSC.
Dated: August 18, 2014.
Carolyn N. Lerner,
Special Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-20056 Filed 8-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7405-01-P