Treasury Directive 75-02 and Directive Publication 75-02, Department of the Treasury National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Program, 49834-49844 [2014-19891]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
49834
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 163 / Friday, August 22, 2014 / Notices
noncompliance so that all future
production vehicles will comply with
FMVSS No. 205.
In summation, MMNA believes that
the described noncompliance of the
subject vehicles is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety, and that its
petition, to exempt from providing
recall notification of noncompliance as
required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and
remedying the recall noncompliance as
required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be
granted.
NHTSA Decision:
NHTSA Analysis: FMVSS No. 205
specifies labeling and performance
requirements for automotive glazing.
FMVSS No. 205 incorporates ANSI
Z26.1 (1996) and other industry
standards by reference (S.5.1).
Paragraph S6 of FMVSS No. 205
requires manufacturers to mark glazing
material in accordance with Section 7 of
ANSI Z26.1 (1996) and to add other
specific markings required by NHTSA.
Section 7 of ANSI Z26.1 (1996) specifies
that in addition to other markings
required, the manufacturer shall include
a model number which will identify the
type of construction of the glazing
material.
According to the petition, the nature
of the noncompliance is the incorrect
model number as required in FMVSS
No. 205 and ANSI Z26.1 (1996).
Mitsubishi has certified that the
window complies with all other safety
performance requirements of FMVSS
No. 205. NHTSA believes that the
incorrect model number is
inconsequential to vehicle safety since
the unmarked glazing complies with the
other labeling and performance
requirements of the standard. Also,
NHTSA believes that the
noncompliance would not result in
inadvertent replacement of the windows
with the wrong glazing because the
population with the labeling
noncompliance will not be available as
replacement/service parts. Mitsubishi
has returned all affected glazing to the
glazing manufacturer, with the
exception of the 311 glazing units that
were installed in vehicles destined to be
sold in the USA, and the manufacturer
scrapped the remainder of the affected
population.
NHTSA Decision: In consideration of
the foregoing, NHTSA has decided that
MMNA has met its burden of persuasion
that the FMVSS No. 205 noncompliance
is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety. Accordingly, MMNA’s petition is
hereby granted and MMNA is exempted
from the obligation of providing
notification of, and a remedy for, that
noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118
and 30120.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Aug 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this
decision only applies to the subject
noncompliant vehicles that MMNA no
longer controlled at the time it
determined that the noncompliance
existed. However, the granting of this
petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant vehicles under their
control after MMNA notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
Health, and Safety, Treasury
Department Annex, Room 6400K, 1500
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC, 20220. Alternatively, comments
relating to this Notice may be submitted
electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clayt Lauter, Director, Office of
Environment, Health & Safety, at 202–
622–1712 (not a toll-free number) or
clayt.lauter@treasury.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
[FR Doc. 2014–19967 Filed 8–21–14; 8:45 am]
The Department of the Treasury
encourages interested persons to submit
written data, views, or comments.
Persons submitting comments should
please include their name, address, and
other appropriate contact information.
You may submit your comments and
material by one of the means listed
under ADDRESSES. If you submit them by
mail, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. Treasury will consider all
comments received during the comment
period.
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
Background
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
Delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Acting Director Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Treasury Directive 75–02 and Directive
Publication 75–02, Department of the
Treasury National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) Program
Office of Environment, Health,
and Safety, Departmental Offices,
Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury (Treasury) is publishing this
notice to provide an opportunity for
public comment on its draft directive
and accompanying guidelines
containing policy and procedures for
implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), as amended, Executive Order
11514, as amended, Executive Order
12114, and Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ) regulations for
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508).
Pursuant to CEQ regulations, Treasury is
soliciting comments from members of
the interested public.
DATES: Comments must be received by
October 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions relating
to this Notice to: Department of the
Treasury, Office of Environment,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
This directive and accompanying
guidelines establish policy and
procedures to ensure the integration of
environmental considerations into the
mission of the Department of the
Treasury. They outline roles and
responsibilities for compliance with
NEPA, and establish a framework for the
balanced and proactive consideration of
NEPA in the planning and execution of
Treasury activities.
Treasury is composed of nine bureaus
and three Inspectors General Offices:
Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP),
Bureau of the Fiscal Service (BFS),
Departmental Offices (DO), Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN),
Internal Revenue Service (IRS), United
States Mint (Mint), Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC),
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau (TTB), Community Development
Financial Institutions Fund (CDFI),
Special Inspector General, Troubled
Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP), Office
of the Inspector General (OIG), and
Treasury Inspector General for Tax
Administration (TIGTA). Note: This
directive does not apply to CDFI. See 12
CFR part 1815, ‘‘Environmental
Quality.’’ Treasury’s responsibilities
include managing federal finances;
collecting taxes, and paying bills of the
United States; producing currency and
coinage; managing government accounts
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 163 / Friday, August 22, 2014 / Notices
and the public debt; supervising
national banks and thrift institutions;
advising on domestic and international
financial, monetary, economic, trade
and tax policy; enforcing federal finance
and tax laws; and investigating and
prosecuting tax evaders, counterfeiters,
and forgers.
The policies and procedures in the
proposed directive and accompanying
guidelines will assist Treasury in
evaluating its actions in light of the
requirements in CEQ regulations and
NEPA. These substantive or procedural
requirements apply to the program
planning and project development in all
Treasury bureaus and offices. In
particular, there is special consideration
of the requirements for public
involvement, dispute resolution,
intergovernmental coordination,
emergency procedures, and handling of
sensitive information in Treasury
decisionmaking.
This proposed directive and
accompanying guidelines include
processes for preparing categorical
exclusions, environmental assessments,
findings of no significant impact, and
environmental impact statements.
Treasury proposes to use these in
conjunction with NEPA, the CEQ
regulations at 40 CFR parts 1500–1508,
and other pertinent environmental
regulations, Executive Orders, statutes,
and laws developed for the
consideration of environmental impacts
of federal actions.
The directive and guidelines were
established by reviewing the historical
actions and missions of all the Treasury
bureaus. They were prepared by bureau
representatives with environmental
policy and operations responsibilities,
under the direction of the Office of
Environment, Health, and Safety.
The group reviewed existing law and
requirements, agency policies, existing
guidance on the implementation of
NEPA from the Council on
Environmental Quality, and it examined
policies and procedures from other
federal agencies to identify policies that
could be appropriate for the missions of
the Treasury Department.
An area of emphasis included the
development of appropriate categorical
exclusions. The group considered that
Treasury’s activities are performed
primarily in office-type environmental
surroundings, but in the case of the
Bureau of Engraving and Printing, and
United States Mint, manufacturing
settings predominate. Likewise, the
group examined existing categorical
exclusions from other federal
departments to determine whether any
might be appropriate for Treasury. The
resulting list of proposed categorical
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Aug 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
exclusions is included in Appendix 1 of
the proposed guidelines.
The Department of the Treasury
solicits public review of this document
and will review and consider those
comments before this directive and
accompanying guidelines are final.
Nani Coloretti,
Assistant Secretary for Management.
TREASURY DIRECTIVE: 75–02
Date: TBD
Sunset Review: TBD
SUBJECT: Department of the Treasury
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Program
1. PURPOSE. This directive
establishes policy, and assigns
responsibilities for implementing the
Council on Environmental Quality’s
(CEQ) regulations for the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) found
at 40 CFR parts 1500–1508.
2. SCOPE. This directive applies to all
bureaus, the Departmental Offices, and
the Office of Inspector General (OIG),
Office of the Treasury Inspector General
for Tax Administration (TIGTA), and
Office of the Special Inspector General
for the Troubled Asset Relief Program
(SIGTARP) (collectively referred to as
‘‘bureaus’’). The provisions of this
directive shall not be construed to
interfere with or impede the authorities
or independence of the Department’s
Inspectors General. Nor shall they be
interpreted to govern environmental
considerations related to awards under
the Community Development Financial
Institutions (CDFI) Fund programs as its
NEPA program is regulated under 12
CFR part 1815, ‘‘Environmental
Quality.’’
3. POLICY.
a. The Department of the Treasury
(Treasury) will consider environmental
quality as equal with economic, social,
and other relevant factors in program
development and decision making
processes. Additionally, Treasury will
fully evaluate its actions to ensure
compliance with the requirements of
NEPA and the CEQ regulations, where
applicable.
b. In assessing the potential
environmental impacts of its actions,
Treasury will consult early with
appropriate federal, state, and local
agencies and other organizations to
provide decision-makers with the
technical and other aspects of
environmental planning.
c. When adverse environmental
impacts are identified, either direct or
indirect, an examination will be made of
alternative courses of action, including
their potential environmental impacts.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49835
The objective of the environmental
review will be to develop a feasible
alternative with the least adverse
environmental impact. The alternative
of not proceeding with the proposal will
also be considered.
4. TERMINOLOGY. The terminology
and definitions contained in 40 CFR
part 1508 shall be employed for the
purposes of this directive.
5. RESPONSIBILITIES.
a. The Assistant Secretary for
Management (ASM) has the authority to
integrate fully all applicable
environmental laws and regulations into
Treasury’s missions and activities. The
ASM shall:
(1) seek to ensure that all actions
taken by Treasury, with respect to the
fulfillment of NEPA and the CEQ
regulations, are duly coordinated with
appropriate federal, state, and local
entities;
(2) provide guidance on
environmental policy and requirements;
(3) assist in reviewing and assessing
the environmental impact of proposed
Treasury actions;
(4) provide guidance in the
consideration, application, preparation,
scoping, processing, and distribution of
categorical exclusions (CEs),
environmental assessments (EAs) and
environmental impact statements (EISs);
(5) receive for clearance action all
CEs, EAs, and EISs, draft and final,
originating in Treasury;
(6) receive all CEs, EAs, and EISs
submitted by other agencies that address
Treasury actions and coordinate the
appropriate review and reply;
(7) perform such other functions as
are specified in this directive or are
appropriate under the CEQ regulations
or other instructions or
recommendations of agencies charged
with carrying out the duties of the
statutes listed in Section 8; and
(8) ensure that EAs, EISs and Findings
of No Significant Impact (FONSIs)
prepared under Treasury’s jurisdiction
are accessible to the public from the
respective bureau’s Web site for five
years from the date of issuance.
b. Heads of Bureaus shall:
(1) prepare, and circulate within
Treasury for the consideration of others,
EAs and EISs when an action or policy
area in question falls under their
jurisdiction;
(2) issue any supplementary
procedures consistent with this
directive for the implementation of
NEPA which the bureaus deem
necessary. Procedures shall be
addressed in accordance with the CEQ
regulations (Section 1507.3) and this
directive and shall be submitted to the
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
49836
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 163 / Friday, August 22, 2014 / Notices
ASM through the OGC for coordination,
review and concurrence.
(3) ensure that communications with
CEQ, and other government agencies or
individuals on matters concerning
Treasury compliance with NEPA and
the relevant CEQ regulations are signed
by, or coordinated with, the ASM
through the OGC. Examples of such
communications are letters transmitting
CEs, EAs, and EISs, reports, and all
Departmental contacts relevant to
Treasury compliance with NEPA and
the CEQ regulations. Unless special
circumstances indicate that a different
officer should act, communications
announcing decisions to prepare EAs or
EISs, requesting comments on draft
statements, or transmitting final
statements for the information of
agencies, shall also be signed by the
ASM and, in the case of a non-Treasury
entity, shall be addressed to its ASM or
equivalent official;
(4) ensure that mitigation measures
that have been identified in decision
documents (e.g., Records of Decision
(RODs)) are carried out. Bureaus shall
institute procedures in coordination
with their environmental program
manager to ensure that the mitigation
measures are carried out (Sections
1505.2(c) and 1505.3, CEQ regulations,
and CEQ Guidance: Appropriate Use of
Mitigation and Monitoring and
Appropriate Use of Mitigated Finding of
No Significant Impact, issued January
14, 2011). Further, the mitigation must
be monitored to assure that it is having
the intended environmental benefits;
(5) provide for early involvement in
all actions which require some form of
federal approval as required by Sections
1501.2(d), and 1500.5 (a, f) of the CEQ
regulations;
(6) ensure public involvement in the
NEPA process pursuant to Section
1506.6 of the CEQ regulations.
Communicate timely and provide
electronic documents related to public
involvement with the ASM through the
Treasury Departmental Offices
Environmental Program Manager (EPM)
located in the OEHS.
(7) prepare legislative EISs. Bureaus
with primary responsibility for
legislative proposals originating in
Treasury, which will significantly affect
the quality of the human environment,
shall be responsible for preparing
legislative EISs. Close coordination shall
be maintained between the ASM
through the EPM and bureaus
concerning the legislative proposals;
(8) designate a NEPA Point-of-Contact
and alternate in their Bureau to
coordinate with the EPM;
(9) perform such other functions as
specified in this directive; and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Aug 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
(10) be responsive to requests from
the CEQ and other relevant agencies for
reports or other information in
connection with the implementation of
NEPA, and for the preparation and
circulation of EISs as required by
Section 1506.9 of the CEQ regulations.
c. The Bureau NEPA Points-ofContact shall collaborate with the EPM
to:
(1) identify actions within their
organization requiring an EA or EIS;
(2) ensure that each required
assessment or statement is prepared in
a timely manner and with the
prescribed content by appropriate staff;
(3) ensure compliance with the
requirements of NEPA, the CEQ
regulations, and this directive by
coordinating the review of such
statements and assessments, and by
maintaining compliance with all
applicable scheduling, scoping,
consultation, circulation, public
hearing, and publication requirements;
(4) maintain effective communication
and consultation with the OGC and
inform key officials of current
developments in environmental policy
and programs;
(5) ensure that the assessment of the
environmental impact of actions
concerning various areas of Treasury
policy and operations, and the
preparation of EAs and EISs relating
thereto, shall be coordinated with the
CEQ;
(6) ensure that all NEPA documents
releasable to the public are provided to
the OGC for review prior to posting on
the Department’s public Web site; and
(7) participate in and/or monitor the
General Services Administration’s
(GSA) NEPA activities involving
Treasury facilities.
d. The EPM shall receive all EAs and
EISs submitted by other agencies for
comment and coordinate the
appropriate review and reply. If any
bureau receives a request for comment
directly from another agency, the
request, together with the respective
documents, shall be referred to the
Departmental Offices (DO)
Environmental Program Manager for
appropriate action. Department of the
Treasury comments should be confined
to matters within the jurisdiction or
expertise of Treasury. However,
comments need not be limited to
environmental aspects, but may relate to
fiscal, economic, and non-governmental
matters of concern to the Department.
6. IMPLEMENTATION. Guidance and
procedures on implementing this
directive are found in Treasury
Directive Publication (TD P) 75–02.
7. AUTHORITIES.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a. National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321, et
seq.
b. National Environmental Policy Act
Regulations, Council on Environmental
Quality, 40 CFR parts 1500–1508.
8. REFERENCES.
a. CEQ NEPA Guidance https://
ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/regs/
guidance.html.
b. Council on Environmental Quality,
Aligning NEPA Processes with
Environmental Management Systems—
A Guide for NEPA and EMS
Practitioners, dated April 2007, https://
ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/NEPA_EMS_
Guide_final_Apr2007.pdf.
c. The NEPA Task Force Report to the
Council on Environmental Quality:
Modernizing NEPA Implementation,
dated September 2003, https://
ceq.hss.doe.gov/ntf/report/.
d. Treasury Directive 75–09,
Environmental, Health, and Safety
Management, Energy, and Sustainability
Program, dated August 13, 2013.
e. Clean Air Act, as amended, 42
U.S.C. 74701 et. seq.
f. Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et.
seq.
g. Coastal Zone Management Act, 16
U.S.C. 1451 et. seq.
h. Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C.
1531 et. seq.
i. Environmental Quality
Improvement Act of 1970, as amended,
42 U.S.C. 4321–4335.
j. Federal Water Pollution Control
Act, 33 U.S.C.1251 et. seq.
k. Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16
U.S.C. 1361 et. seq.
l. National Historic Preservation Act,
16 U.S.C. 470 et. seq.
m. National Marine Sanctuaries Act,
16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.
n. Executive Order 11514, ‘‘Protection
and Enhancement of Environmental
Quality,’’ dated March 5, 1970, as
amended by E.O. 11991, dated May 24,
1977.
o. Executive Order 11988,
‘‘Floodplain Management,’’ dated May
24, 1977.
p. Executive Order 11990, ‘‘Protection
of Wetlands,’’ dated May 24, 1977 (42
FR 26961), as amended by Executive
Order 12608, dated September 9, 1987.
q. Executive Order 12114,
‘‘Environmental Effects Abroad of Major
Federal Actions,’’ dated January 4, 1979,
(44 FR 1957).
r. Executive Order 12898, ‘‘Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations,’’ dated
February 11, 1994, (59 FR 7629).
s. Executive Order 13423,
‘‘Strengthening Federal Environmental,
Energy, and Transportation
Management,’’ dated January 24, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 163 / Friday, August 22, 2014 / Notices
t. Executive Order 13514, ‘‘Federal
Leadership in Environmental, Energy,
and Economic Performance,’’ dated
October 5, 2009.
9. CANCELLATION. Treasury
Directive 75–02, ‘‘Department of the
Treasury Environmental Quality
Program,’’ dated September 25, 1990, is
superseded.
10. EMERGENCIES. In the event of
emergencies which may require a
bureau to take an action with significant
environmental impacts without
complying with this directive or the
CEQ regulations, the CEQ should be
consulted, through the EPM, about
alternative arrangements (Section
1506.11, CEQ regulations).
11. OFFICES OF PRIMARY
INTEREST. The Office of Environment,
Health, and Safety. Office of Assistant
Secretary for Management.
Nani Coloretti, Assistant Secretary for
Management
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Treasury Directive Publication 75–02
SUBJECT: Guidelines for Implementing
the Department of the Treasury National
Environmental Policy Act Program
1. PURPOSE. This Treasury Directive
Publication (Publication) provides
guidelines and procedures for the
effective implementation of the Council
on Environmental Quality (CEQ)
regulations on the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
2. SCOPE. This directive publication
applies to all bureaus, the Departmental
Offices, and the Office of Inspector
General (OIG), Office of the Treasury
Inspector General for Tax
Administration (TIGTA), and Office of
the Special Inspector General for the
Troubled Asset Relief Program
(SIGTARP) (collectively referred to as
‘‘bureaus’’). The provisions of this
directive shall not be construed to
interfere with or impede the authorities
or independence of the Department’s
Inspectors General. Nor shall they be
interpreted to govern environmental
considerations related to awards under
the Community Development Financial
Institutions (CDFI) Fund programs as its
NEPA program is regulated under 12
CFR part 1815, ‘‘Environmental
Quality.’’
3. RELATED DIRECTIVE. Treasury
Directive 75–02, ‘‘Department of the
Treasury National Environmental Policy
Act Program.’’
4. RESPONSIBLE OFFICE. Office of
Environment, Health, and Safety
(OEHS) within the Office of the Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Management and
Budget (DASMB).
5. EARLY INVOLVEMENT IN
ACTIONS INITIATED BY PRIVATE OR
OTHER NON–FEDERAL ENTITIES.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Aug 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
(1) To implement the requirements of
Section 1501.2(d) of the CEQ regulations
with respect to actions planned by
private or other non-federal entities that
require some form of federal approval
(for example, loans, grants, or approvals
in connection with bureau managed or
regulated facilities), each bureau shall:
(a) prepare, within a reasonable
timeframe, generic guidelines describing
the scope and level of environmental
information required from applicants as
a basis for evaluating their proposed
actions and make these guidelines
available;
(b) provide such guidance on a
project-by-project basis to applicants
seeking assistance from the bureau;
(c) upon receipt of an application for
bureau approval, or notification that an
application will be filed, consult as
required with other appropriate parties
to initiate and coordinate any necessary
environmental analyses;
(d) consult with appropriate federal,
regional state and local agencies and
other potentially interested parties
during preliminary planning stages to
ensure that all environmental factors are
identified;
(e) communicate and consult in a
timely manner with the ASM through
the Treasury Departmental Offices
Environmental Program Manager (EPM)
located in the OEHS.
(2) The responsible bureau shall
independently evaluate the information
submitted by the applicant and, if it
accepts that information, shall be
responsible for its accuracy. If the
bureau chooses to use the information
submitted by the applicant in an EA or
EIS, it must include the names of the
persons responsible for the independent
evaluation in a list of preparers (Section
1506.5(a), CEQ regulations).
(3) To facilitate compliance with the
requirements above, private applicants
and other non-federal entities should be
advised to:
(a) contact Treasury as early as
possible in the planning process for
guidance on the scope and level of
environmental information which may
be required to be submitted in support
of their application;
(b) conduct any studies which are
deemed necessary and appropriate by
Treasury to determine the impact of the
proposed action on the human
environment;
(c) submit applications for necessary
federal, regional, state and local
approvals as early as possible in the
planning process;
(d) notify Treasury as early as possible
of any other federal, regional, state, local
and Indian tribe actions required for
project completion so that Treasury may
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49837
coordinate all federal environmental
reviews; and
(e) notify Treasury of any known
parties potentially affected by, or
interested in, the proposed action.
6. THE NEPA PROCESS.
a. Classes of Action Requiring Similar
Treatment Under NEPA.
(1) NEPA actions undertaken by
Treasury may be broken down into three
main classes of action:
(a) those actions normally requiring
EISs, such as proposals for major
Treasury building projects involving
large land acquisition and construction
of large facilities, or for proposed
legislation which may have a significant
effect on the environment;
(b) those actions normally requiring
EAs, but not necessarily EISs, such as
proposals to build a new warehouse for
non-hazardous storage, production of
next generation currency, or approval of
plastic liquor bottles or ethanol permits;
and
(c) those actions requiring neither an
EIS nor an EA; e.g., categorical
exclusions (CEs). CEs are actions which
meet the definition contained in 40 CFR
1508.4, and, based on past experience
with similar actions, typically do not
involve significant environmental
impacts, either individually or
cumulatively.
(2) Treasury does not, in general, have
responsibility for actions which will
have a significant effect on the quality
of the human environment. Decisions as
to whether environmental
documentation is required shall be
made on a case-by-case basis by the
head of the bureau involved in
conjunction with the ASM through the
EPM. Additional guidance may be
obtained from the CEQ.
(3) In the event a proposed action falls
within either category (a) or (b) of subparagraph (1) above, the bureau should
take the appropriate steps outlined in
sections 8 and 9 below. If the proposed
action is categorically excluded, then
the bureau may proceed with
implementing the action.
b. Integrating the NEPA Process with
Bureau Planning and Decision Making.
(1) The ultimate purpose of NEPA is
to ensure that public officials make
decisions based on an understanding of
the environmental consequences of
proposed major federal actions. The
means provided by NEPA to achieve its
goals is called the ‘‘NEPA process’’ and
is outlined in Sec. 102 of NEPA [42 USC
§ 4332].
(2) At all appropriate facilities and
organizational levels, bureaus shall
integrate their NEPA process within
their environmental management
system (EMS). To comply with NEPA,
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
49838
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 163 / Friday, August 22, 2014 / Notices
bureaus must ensure that the NEPA
process is integrated with bureau
planning and decision making as early
as possible (Sections 1501.2 and 1505.1,
CEQ Regulations). Accordingly, bureaus
shall:
(a) ensure, where necessary, final EAs
or EISs and related documents
accompany proposals through the entire
review process;
(b) consider and balance pertinent
non-environmental factors with those
relating to the environment and
consider all practicable alternatives and
mitigation measures identified in the
environmental documents;
(c) make no decision on a proposed
action until the applicable timing
requirements have been met;
(d) communicate and consult in a
timely manner with the ASM through
the EPM; and
(e) prepare a concise public record of
the decision at the time it is made, or,
for a legislative EIS, at the time of its
recommendation to Congress. This
record will be prepared in accordance
with Section 1505.2 of the CEQ
regulations.
7. DOCUMENTING A DEPARTMENT
OF THE TREASURY CATEGORICAL
EXCLUSION (CE).
a. The head of the bureau shall
prepare a Record of Categorical
Exclusion Determination when a
category of actions repeatedly
demonstrates no significant effect on the
human environment or the agency has
other evidence that a CE is warranted.
This might include through scientific
evidence or review of other agencies’
categorical exclusions.
Appendix 1 lists bureau actions
which Treasury has determined do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. To find that a proposal is
categorically excluded, the bureau shall
determine the following:
(1) The proposal fits within one of the
classes of actions that are listed in
Appendix 1; and
(2) There are no extraordinary
circumstances related to the proposed
action that are present that may have a
significant environmental effect. The
extraordinary circumstances set forth by
the Department of the Treasury are as
follows:
(a) An action that results in a project
of greater scope or size than typically
experienced for a particular category of
actions;
(b) Highly controversial
environmental effects exist where
controversy is defined as: voiced
opposition from state/local agencies/
tribes, an unusual level of concern
raised by the public, or use of unproven
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Aug 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
technology with uncertain
environmental effects;
(c) Potential impacts to areas of
critical environmental concern are
found, including, but not limited to,
prime or unique agricultural lands,
wetlands or floodplains, coastal zones,
wilderness areas, aquifers, or wild and
scenic rivers;
(d) Potential effects to properties or
archaeological resources exist, which
are either listed or eligible for listing on
the National Register of Historic Places
(note: this extraordinary circumstance is
not applicable if a separate Section 106
process under the National Historic
Preservation Act has been completed
resulting in the concurrence of the State
Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) or
the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
(THPO) or the signing of a
Memorandum of Agreement with the
SHPO or THPO and/or the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation);
(e) Adverse effects exist on species
endangered, threatened, or proposed to
be listed on the List of Endangered or
Threatened Species or located in an area
designated as Critical Habitat for an
endangered or threatened species or
other protected resources;
(f) Possible violation exists of federal,
state, local, or tribal law for the
protection of the environment;
(g) Inconsistencies exist with any
federal, state, local or tribal law,
requirement or administrative
determination relating to the
environmental aspects of the action;
(h) Potential for degradation exists,
even though slight, of already existing
poor environmental conditions;
(i) Presence of hazardous or toxic
substances exists at levels which exceed
federal, state, local or tribal law or
regulations or standards requiring action
or attention;
(j) Potential exists for adverse effects
on health or safety; or
(k) Potential for significant
cumulative impacts exist when the
proposed action is combined with other
past, present, and reasonably
foreseeable future actions, even though
the impacts of the proposed action may
not be significant by themselves.
(l) The degree to which the possible
effects on the human environment are
highly uncertain or involve unique or
unknown risks.
(m) The degree to which the action
may establish a precedent for future
actions with significant effects or
represents a decision in principle about
a future consideration.
b. When it is determined that an
activity warrants a CE, the following is
required to be documented by the
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
bureau with an electronic copy sent to
the EPM:
(1) A completed Environmental
Analysis for Categorical Exclusions
form;
(2) A reference to the type of CE being
applied. (Appendix 1);
(3) A determination statement which
shall be signed and dated by the bureau
head. [Suggested statement language:
Based on my review of information
conveyed to me and attached
concerning the proposed action
designation of a categorical exclusion, I
have determined that the proposed
action is categorically excluded under
Treasury Directive 75–02 and the
proposed action is not subject to any
extraordinary circumstances and is
hereby precluded from further NEPA
review.]
c. The EPM will post the final
document identifying the CE on the
Treasury Department’s public Web site.
8. WRITING A DEPARTMENT OF
THE TREASURY ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT (EA).
a. The head of the bureau shall
prepare the assessment. The assessment
shall be submitted electronically to the
ASM through the EPM for review and
approval. The EPM will place the final
document(s) on the Department of the
Treasury Public NEPA Web site.
b. To the extent practicable, other
agencies, applicants, and the public
should be involved in preparing the EA
(see also Section 1501.4.b, CEQ
regulations). Responsibility for
information provided by applicants for
use in preparing an EA or for
assessments prepared by an applicant
for an organization is outlined in
Section 1506.5(b) of the CEQ
regulations.
c. Treasury EAs shall:
(1) describe the proposed action and
the need for it;
(2) briefly describe the environmental
impacts of, and alternatives to, the
proposed action, including mitigation
measures;
(3) identify and analyze impacts
associated with energy (including
alternative energy sources) and climate
change;
(4) list the agencies and persons
consulted;
(5) provide a brief analysis, based
upon the above evidence, for
determining whether to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS),
or a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI); and
(6) make EAs and findings of no
significant impact available to the
public.
d. NEPA requires that for all
proposals for legislation or other major
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 163 / Friday, August 22, 2014 / Notices
federal actions significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment, the
environmental implications of the
proposal are to be explored.
e. Whenever a Bureau matter,
including the initiation of any action or
program previously discontinued, could
constitute a major federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment, an EA shall be
prepared as soon as possible, and at all
times prior to the decision to take or to
continue the action.
f. An EA need not be prepared if an
organization has decided to prepare an
EIS on a proposed action.
9. WRITING A DEPARTMENT OF
THE TREASURY ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS).
a. Once it is determined that an
organization shall be responsible for
preparing an EIS, a notice of intent shall
be promptly published in the Federal
Register. The EPM will provide
consultation while the organization will
provide necessary communication to the
EPM in order to keep the ASM advised.
b. The scoping process, outlined in
Section 1501.7 of the CEQ regulations,
shall be used for determining the scope
of issues to be addressed and for
identifying the significant issues related
to the proposed action. The organization
involved and in consultation with the
SAO through the EPM, shall be
responsible for carrying out the scoping
process in accordance with the CEQ
regulations.
c. Section 1501.5(a) of the CEQ
regulations provides that a lead agency
shall supervise the preparation of an EIS
if more than one federal agency either
proposes or is involved in the same
action, or is involved in a group of
actions directly related to each other
because of their functional
interdependence or geographical
proximity (see also Section 1506.2, CEQ
regulations).
d. In the event the preparation of an
EIS for a proposed organization action
requires the designation of a lead agency
for either of these reasons, the head of
the organization shall contact the EPM
for guidance. The bureaus shall seek out
and coordinate with Cooperating
Agencies (Federal, tribal or state) for EIS
activities as outlined in 1501.5 and
1501.6. Any communications with other
agencies which deal with lead agency
designations shall be coordinated with
the EPM. The criteria and
responsibilities for lead and cooperating
agencies are outlined in Section 1501.5
and 1501.6 of the CEQ regulations,
respectively.
e. EISs shall first be issued in draft,
for comment by government agencies
and the public. Final EISs that address
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Aug 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
comments received shall then be issued.
Requirements for preparing and
circulating draft and final statements
(Part 1502 of the CEQ regulations) are as
follows:
(1) Timing.
(a) The timing of the preparation,
circulation, submission, and public
availability of EISs is of great
importance. EISs are not intended to be
justification documents for proposed
actions but are to be objective
evaluations of proposed actions and
their alternatives in light of all
reasonably pertinent environmental
considerations (Section 1502.2(g), CEQ
regulations).
(b) EISs are then filed with the EPA.
The EPA, in turn, publishes a weekly
notice in the Federal Register of the
EISs filed during the preceding week.
No decisions on the proposed action
may be made by the office/bureau until
the following time periods calculated
from the publication date of the EPA
notice have been observed.
1. Not less than 45 days for comment
on draft statements (Section 1506.10(c),
CEQ regulations).
2. Not less than 90 days and 30 days,
respectively, for public availability of
draft and final statements prior to
administrative actions. These periods
may run concurrently (Section
1506.10(b) and (c), CEQ regulations).
3. Not less than 15 days for public
availability of draft statements prior to
any relevant hearing on proposed
administrative actions (Section
1506.6(c)(2), CEQ regulations).
4. The time periods prescribed in
paragraphs 1 through 3 may be extended
or reduced, in specific instances, in
accordance with Section 1506.10 of the
CEQ regulations.
(2) Securing Information.
(a) The full resources of Treasury
should be utilized in developing the
factual and analytic information and
reference sources required in the
preparation of an EIS. The assistance of
other agencies, federal, state, tribal, or
local, with jurisdiction by law or special
expertise concerning the environmental
impacts involved should also be sought.
Further, in accordance with Section
1506.3 of the CEQ regulations, bureaus
may adopt, in whole or in part, a draft
or final EIS prepared elsewhere in the
Department or by another federal
agency.
(b) If the organization is having
difficulty in securing requisite
information or needs guidance, the EPM
will assist in locating needed
information through the CEQ, EPA, or
other appropriate sources.
(3) Writing and Content.
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49839
(a) EISs are to be written in plain
language, and may include appropriate
graphics, so that bureau decision makers
and the public can readily understand
them (Section 1502.8, CEQ regulations).
(b) The ‘‘scoping’’ process shall be
utilized so that only significant issues
related to the proposed action are
analyzed in depth. (Section 1501.7, CEQ
regulations).
(c) EISs should be as concise as
possible while still providing adequate,
meaningful, and factual information and
analysis to permit an evaluation of the
proposed action from the environmental
standpoint. Their length shall normally
be less than 150 pages, and for
proposals of unusual scope or
complexity, less than 300 pages (Section
1502.7, CEQ regulations). ‘‘Tiering’’
(Section 1502.20, CEQ regulations) and
‘‘incorporation by reference’’ (Section
1502.21, CEQ regulations) should be
used, where appropriate, to insure that
statements are kept concise.
(d) Quantitative information about the
proposed action, including actual or
estimated data on its probable effects,
should be included to the greatest extent
practicable. If a cost-benefit analysis of
the proposed action has been prepared,
it should be incorporated by reference
or appended to the EIS as an aid in
evaluating the environmental
consequences (Section 1502.23, CEQ
regulations).
(e) All reasonable alternatives and
their environmental impacts shall be
addressed, to include identifying and
analyzing impacts associated with
energy (including alternative energy
sources) and climate change, regardless
of whether or not they are not within
the authority of the Department (Section
1502.14(c), CEQ regulations).
Appropriate mitigation measures shall
also be discussed (Section 1502.14(f),
CEQ regulations).
(f) The basic content requirements for
EISs are set forth in Section 1502.10–25
of the CEQ regulations. Bureaus shall
follow the prescribed outline and
content requirements described therein
as closely as is feasible in each
particular case.
(g) Draft and final statements should
refer to the underlying studies, reports,
and other documents considered by the
preparing organization and indicate
how such documents may be obtained.
With the exception of standard
reference documents, such as
congressional materials, the bureau
should maintain a file of the respective
documents which may be consulted by
interested persons. If especially
significant documents are attached to
the EIS, care should be taken to insure
that the statement remains an
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
49840
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 163 / Friday, August 22, 2014 / Notices
essentially self-contained instrument
easily understood without the need for
undue cross-reference.
(4) Utilizing Contractors. A contractor
may be selected to prepare the EIS.
Organization responsibility, in the event
a contractor is employed, is outlined in
Section 1506.5 (c) of the CEQ
regulations. The work of a contractor,
however, must be fully reviewed,
endorsed, and fully adopted by the
Department of the Treasury for it to be
used as the NEPA document of the
agency.
(5) Circulation. The entire draft and
final EIS shall be circulated in
accordance with Section 1502.19 of the
CEQ regulations. Appendices and
unchanged statements may be treated in
accordance with Sections 1502.18(d)
and 1503.4(c). If the statement is
unusually long, the organization may
circulate the summary instead (Section
1502.12, CEQ regulations), except that
the entire statement shall be furnished
as specified in Section 1502.19.
(6) Public Involvement. Section
1506.6 of the CEQ regulations requires
public involvement in the NEPA
process. The relevant bureau will
communicate timely and provide
electronic documents related to public
involvement with the ASM through the
OGC, who will be available for
consultation with the bureau.
(a) To comply with this requirement,
bureaus shall:
1. Provide for public hearings
whenever appropriate. Whenever, under
the normal policies or procedures of the
organization a hearing would be held on
a matter requiring the preparation of an
EIS, the environmental aspects should
be included in the hearing. In other
cases, the question of whether a hearing
should be held with respect to an
environmental matter shall be
determined in accordance with the
criteria set forth in Section 1506.6 (c) of
the CEQ regulations. Normally, all
hearings contemplated in this paragraph
should be based on a draft EIS which
should be made available to the public
at least 15 days before the hearing.
2. Provide public notice of NEPArelated hearings, public meetings, and
the availability of environmental
documents. The notice should be
provided by the means most likely to
inform those persons and agencies that
may be interested or affected.
(a) Section 1506.6(b) of the CEQ
regulations provides notification
methods that may be used, including
publication in local newspapers of
general circulation, notice to state and
local clearinghouses, and notice by
mail.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Aug 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
(b) A notice of the filing and
availability of each EIS, draft and final,
shall be inserted in the Federal Register
by the responsible organization.
3. Make EISs and EAs, along with any
comments and underlying documents,
available to the public on the
Department of the Treasury public Web
site through a link to their bureau public
Web site and pursuant to the Freedom
of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), the
Department’s regulations there under
(31 CFR part 1), and the disclosure
regulations of the bureau (Section
1506.6(f), CEQ regulations).
(a) These materials are to be placed in
the public reading room of the Treasury
Library in Washington, DC, and the
public reading rooms of the organization
if any are maintained. The documents
may be read or copied during working
hours.
(b) Copies to be made available to the
public shall normally be provided on
paper meeting the requirements of
Executive Order (E.O.) 13423 or
superseding E.O. and without charge.
However, when such costs are
significant, the organization may, in
accordance with Section 1506.6(f) of the
CEQ regulations, establish a fee which
shall not exceed the actual cost of
reproducing the copies. Multi-page
documents are to be duplex printed
(double-sided), unless otherwise
required.
(6) Commenting.
(a) With respect to draft EISs, it is
essential that the organizations consult
with, and take account of the comments
of, appropriate federal, state and local
agencies. This shall involve the formal
solicitation of review and comments on
the draft statement (Section 1503.1, CEQ
regulations). When appropriate,
procedures for obtaining state and local
comments shall be utilized (Section
1503.1(a)(2), CEQ regulations).
(b) Comments should also be
requested from individuals or
organizations which appear to have a
special interest in some significant
environmental aspect of the proposed
action (Section 1503.1(a)(4), CEQ
regulations).
(c) All substantive comments received
on draft EISs (or summaries thereof
where the comments are exceptionally
long), should be attached to final EIS,
whether or not each such comment is
thought to merit individual discussion
in the text of the statement (Section
1503.4(b), CEQ regulations).
(d) Section 102(2)(C) of NEPA
requires that the final EIS shall
accompany the proposal to which it
relates through the agency review
process.
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10. ACTIONS EXCLUDED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CEQ
REGULATIONS. In accordance with
CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1500.6 and
1508.18(a)), some classes of actions may
be thought to not trigger NEPA.
Consultation with the Office of General
Counsel must be initiated at the earliest
time such an issue arises.
11. OTHER NEPA REGULATORY
PROVISIONS.
(a) Emergency Actions/Alternate
Arrangements: In the event of an
emergency situation, Treasury may be
required to take an action to prevent or
reduce the risk to the environment,
public health, or safety that may impact
the human environment without
evaluating those impacts under NEPA.
40 CFR 1506 provides that CEQ may
grant alternative arrangements for, but
not eliminate, NEPA compliance where
a national emergency, disaster, or
similar great urgency makes it necessary
to take actions that merit an
environmental impact statement
without observing all the provisions of
CEQ regulations. The processing times
may be reduced or, if the emergency
situation warrants, preparation and
processing of environmental impact
statements may be abbreviated. Upon
learning of the emergency situation, the
EPM will immediately inform CEQ of
the emergency situation when the
proposed Treasury action is expected to
result in significant impacts on the
human environment. In some cases, the
emergency action may be covered by an
existing NEPA analysis or an
exemption. In other cases, it may not be
covered. In these cases, the CEQ (in
consultation with EPM) will establish
alternate arrangements for NEPA
compliance. The EPM will provide
continued follow-up consultation with
CEQ throughout the duration of the
emergency situation. The provisions of
this section do not apply to actions
taken after the emergency situation has
been resolved or those related to
recovery operations. In an EIS where the
proposed action is not expected to result
in significant impacts on the human
environment, the EPM ensures that the
appropriate NEPA documentation is
prepared to the extent practicable before
or concurrent with the emergency
actions required to control the
emergency and before any follow-up
actions are taken (40 CFR 1506.11).
(b) Incomplete or Unavailable
Information: If Treasury determines that
there is incomplete or unavailable
information while evaluating reasonably
foreseeable significant adverse effects on
the human environment in an EIS, it
shall make clear that that such
information is lacking.
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 163 / Friday, August 22, 2014 / Notices
If this information is essential to
choosing a reasonable alternative and
obtaining it is not cost prohibitive,
Treasury shall include that information.
If the information relevant to reasonably
foreseeable significant adverse impacts
cannot be obtained because the overall
costs of obtaining it are exorbitant or the
means to obtain it are not known,
Treasury shall include within the EIS:
(1) a statement that such information
is incomplete or unavailable;
(2) a statement of the relevance of the
incomplete or unavailable information
to evaluating reasonably foreseeable
significant adverse impacts on the
human environment;
(3) a summary of existing credible
scientific evidence which is relevant to
evaluating the reasonably foreseeable
significant adverse impacts on the
human environment; and
(4) Treasury’s evaluation of such
impacts based upon theoretical
approaches or research methods
generally accepted in the scientific
community. For the purposes of this
section, ‘‘reasonably foreseeable’’
includes impacts which have
catastrophic consequences, even if their
probability of occurrence is low,
provided that the analysis of the
impacts is supported by credible
scientific evidence, is not based on pure
conjecture, and is within the rule of
reason.
(c) Incorporation by Reference: In
order to reduce the size of documents,
whenever possible, Treasury will
incorporate material by reference into
an EIS providing it will not impede
Treasury and public review of the
action. The incorporated material shall
be cited in the document and its content
briefly described. No material may be
incorporated by reference unless it is
reasonably available for inspection by
potentially interested persons within
the time allowed for comment. Material
based on proprietary data which is itself
not available for review and comment
shall not be incorporated by reference.
12. REQUIREMENTS FOR
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND
PROTECTION OF WETLANDS.
Executive Order 11988, ‘‘Floodplain
Management,’’ and Executive Order
11990, ‘‘Protection of Wetlands,’’ direct
federal agencies to ensure that the
potential effects of any proposed actions
they may take in a floodplain or wetland
are considered and evaluated in their
decision making.
In a Federal Register notice of May
24, 1978 (43 FR 22311), Treasury
advised that, as a general rule, it does
not engage in activities which would
impact on floodplain or wetlands. It was
further stated that no separate Treasury
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Aug 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
procedures implementing these
Executive Orders would be issued, but
rather that such procedures would be
incorporated in this directive.
(1) To the extent possible, Bureaus are
to avoid actions which would result in
modification or destruction of
floodplain and wetlands and, wherever
there is a practicable alternative, are to
avoid direct or indirect support of new
development or construction in a
floodplain or wetlands.
(2) In the case of any proposed
Department of the Treasury action
which may involve floodplain or
wetlands, and which may require the
preparation of and EA or EIS, the
assessment or statement shall include
necessary data on the floodplain or
wetlands in keeping with these
procedures.
(3) In the event of floodplain or
wetlands involvement, the following
procedural steps are to be followed.
(Although these steps specifically
mention floodplain, they are also
applicable to wetlands.)
(a) Determine if the proposed action is
in a floodplain.
(b) Provide for public involvement in
a floodplain management decision
making process by informing the public
of the intent to locate in the floodplain,
and by encouraging public comments
thereon.
(c) Identify and evaluate practicable
alternatives to locating in a floodplain,
including alternative sites, alternative
actions, or no action.
(d) If determined that the only
practicable alternative is to locate in a
floodplain, identify the impacts of the
proposed action using the NEPA process
and EA or EIS procedures in this
directive. Focus especially on the
adverse impacts of the proposed action
on lives and property in the area, and
on natural and beneficial floodplain
values.
(e) If harm to, or within, a floodplain
may result from the proposed action,
determine ways to minimize the harm
and to restore and preserve the
floodplain values. Measures should be
considered to include the use of offsite
floodplain/wetland mitigation ‘‘banks’’.
(f) Reevaluate the proposed
alternatives, based on the information
obtained and consider whether the
proposed action is still feasible at the
site or should be limited.
(g) A statement of findings and public
explanation, including a brief comment
period, must be provided for the
proposed action if reevaluation
determines that the proposed action is
the only practicable alternative.
13. PROPOSALS FOR LEGISLATION.
A legislative environmental impact
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49841
statement is the detailed statement
required by law to be included in a
recommendation or report on a
legislative proposal (that originates
within Treasury) to Congress. A
legislative EIS shall be considered part
of the formal transmittal of a legislative
proposal to Congress, although it may be
sent to Congress up to 30 days later to
allow time for completion and accuracy.
In all instances, the legislative statement
must be available in time for
Congressional hearings and
deliberations in order that it may serve
as a basis for public and Congressional
debate (Section 1506.8(a), CEQ
regulations).
(a) Preparation of a legislative EIS
shall conform to the requirements for
EISs except as follows:
(1) There need not be a ‘‘scoping’’
process.
(2) The legislative EIS, although
prepared in the same manner as a draft
EIS, shall be considered that ‘‘detailed
statement’’ required by statute. Provided
that, when any of the following
conditions exist, both a draft and final
legislative EIS shall be prepared and
circulated as provided in Sections
1503.1 and 1506.10 of the CEQ
regulations.
(a) A congressional committee with
jurisdiction over the proposal has a rule
requiring both draft and final EISs.
(b) The proposal results from a study
process required by statute.
(c) Legislative approval is sought for
federal or federally assisted construction
or other projects which the office/
bureau recommends be located at
specific geographic locations. For
proposals requiring an EIS for the
acquisition of space by the GSA, draft
and final EISs shall be provided to GSA
for use during the approval process.
(d) The organization prepares draft
and final statements with an electronic
copy to the EPM.
14. FILING AND DISTRIBUTION OF
EISs AND SUPPLEMENTAL
STATEMENTS.
a. The bureaus will communicate
timely and provide electronic versions
and written and bound copies, as
needed, of their EIS and related
documents concerning filing and
distribution of EISs and Supplemental
Statements with the ASM through the
EPM. The EPM will place the
documents on the Department of the
Treasury Public NEPA Web site, and
will be available for bureau
consultation.
b. As of October 1, 2012 EPA no
longer accepts paper copies or compact
discs (CDs) of EISs for filing purposes.
EPA’s online tool e-NEPA (https://
www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
49842
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 163 / Friday, August 22, 2014 / Notices
submiteis/e-nepa-guide-on-registrationand-preparing-an-eis-for-electronicsubmission.pdf) meets their
requirements for EIS filing. All
submissions must be made through eNEPA. At the same time as they are filed
with EPA, EISs shall also be sent to
commenting agencies and made
available to the public (Section 1506.9,
CEQ regulations). Any supplement to an
EIS shall be made a part of the formal
record, if such a record exists, before a
final decision on the proposal is made
(Section 1502.9(c)(3), CEQ regulations).
15. OTHER REQUIREMENTS.
a. Integrating Departmental
Procedures with Other Environmental
Review and Consultation Requirements.
(1) Section 1501.7(a)(6) of the CEQ
regulations requires that, as part of the
scoping process, agencies identify other
environmental review and consultation
requirements so that any other required
analyses or studies may be prepared
concurrently and integrated with EAs
and EISs.
(2) The attention of the bureaus is
directed particularly to the analyses and
studies required by the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C.
661, et seq.); the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended,
(16 U.S.C. 470, et seq.); the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531, et
seq.); E.O. 11988, ‘‘Floodplain
CE# ......
A1 .........
A2 .........
A3 .........
A4 .........
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
A5 .........
A6 .........
Management,’’ dated May 24, 1977; E.O.
11990, ‘‘Protection of Wetlands,’’ dated
May 24, 1977; CEQ Memorandum,
‘‘Interagency Consultation to Avoid or
Mitigate Adverse Effects on Rivers in
the Nationwide Inventory,’’ dated
August 10, 1980; CEQ Memorandum,
‘‘Analysis of Impacts on Prime or
Unique Agricultural Lands in
Implementing the National
Environmental Policy,’’ dated August
11, 1980; and other similar
requirements.
b. EPA Review.
(1) Section 309 of the Clean Air Act
(42 U.S.C. 7609) provides that the EPA
Administrator shall comment in writing
on the environmental impact of any
matter within the area of EPA
responsibility. Those areas include air
and water quality, noise abatement and
control, pesticide regulation, solid waste
disposal, and generally applicable
environmental radiation criteria and
standards.
EPA has developed a set of criteria for
rating draft EISs. The rating system
provides a basis upon which EPA makes
recommendations to the lead agency for
improving the draft EIS. These are rated
in two categories; rating the
Environmental Impact of the Action,
and rating the Adequacy of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement.
Additional information can be found
here: https://www.epa.gov/compliance/
nepa/comments/ratings.html
(2) If the EPA Administrator
determines that the matter ‘‘is
unsatisfactory from the standpoint of
public health or welfare or
environmental quality,’’ the matter is to
be referred to the CEQ in accordance
with the criteria and procedures
outlined in Sections 1504.2 and 1504.3
of the CEQ regulations.
(3) Under Section 102(2)(C) of NEPA,
other federal agencies are authorized to
make similar reviews and referrals in
accordance with the criteria and
procedures in Section 1504.2 and
1504.3 of the CEQ regulations.
c. All hardcopy reports required shall
be printed on paper containing a
minimum of 30 percent postconsumer
fiber and also shall be printed or copied
double-sided, to the degree possible.
Appendix 1: Categorical Exclusions
Categorical Exclusions (CEs)
The CE is intended to reduce paperwork
and eliminate unnecessary EA and EIS
preparation. Treasury actions which are
considered to be categorically excluded are
listed in the table below. The list is not
exhaustive and any new CE shall be prepared
in accordance with the instructions provided
in Treasury Directive Publication (TD P) 75–
02. The term ‘‘new’’ includes substantive
revisions to existing CEs.
ADMINISTRATIVE AND REGULATORY ACTIVITIES. These categorical exclusions have the additional requirement to be conducted
in conformance with Executive Orders 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management, and
13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance.
Personnel actions, including recruiting, processing, paying, recordkeeping, and resource management; fiscal, general management,
administrative activities, budgeting, other personnel actions, and travel.
Reductions, realignments, or relocation of personnel that do not result in exceeding the infrastructure capacity or change the use of
space. An example of a substantial change in use of the supporting infrastructure would be an increase in vehicular traffic beyond
the capacity of the supporting road network to accommodate such an increase.
Promulgation of rules, issuance of rulings or interpretations, and the development and publication of policies, orders, directives, notices, procedures, manuals, and other guidance documents of the following nature:
(a) Those of a strictly administrative or procedural nature;
(b) Those that adopt, without substantive change, statutory or regulatory requirements;
(c) Those that implement, without substantive change, procedures, manuals, and other guidance documents;
(d) Those that interpret or amend an existing regulation without changing its environmental effect;
(e) Technical guidance on safety and security matters; or
(f) Guidance for the preparation of security plans.
Information gathering, data analysis and processing, information dissemination, review, interpretation, and development of documents. If any of these activities result in proposals for further action, those proposals must be covered by an appropriate CE. Examples include but are not limited to:
(a) Document mailings, publication and distribution, training and information programs, historical and cultural demonstrations, and
public affairs actions.
(b) Studies, reports, proposals, analyses, literature reviews; computer modeling; and non-intrusive information gathering activities.
Awarding of contracts for technical support services, ongoing management and operation of government facilities.
Procurement of non-hazardous goods and services, and storage, recycling, and disposal of non-hazardous materials and wastes, that
complies with applicable requirements and is in support of routine administrative, operational, or maintenance activities. Storage activities must occur on improved land or in existing facilities. Examples of non-hazardous goods and services include, but are not
limited to:
(a) Office supplies,
(b) Equipment,
(c) Mobile assets,
(d) Utility services,
(e) Chemicals and low level radio nuclides for laboratory use,
(f) Deployable emergency response supplies and equipment, and,
(g) Waste disposal and contracts for waste disposal in established permitted landfills and facilities.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Aug 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 163 / Friday, August 22, 2014 / Notices
A7 .........
CE# ......
B1 .........
B2 .........
B3 .........
B4 .........
B5 .........
B6 .........
B7 .........
B8 .........
B9 .........
CE# ......
C1 ........
C2 ........
C3 ........
C4 ........
CE# ......
D1 ........
D2 ........
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
D3 ........
D4 ........
CE# ......
E1 .........
E2 .........
49843
The commitment of resources, personnel, and funding to conduct audits, surveys, and data collection provided that the technology or
procedure involved is well understood and there are no adverse environmental impacts anticipated from it. If any of these commitments result in proposals for further action, those proposals must be covered by an appropriate CE. Examples include, but are not
limited to:
(a) Activities designed to support improvement or upgrade of management of natural resources, such as surveys for threatened
and endangered species, wildlife and wildlife habitat, historic properties, and archeological sites; wetland delineations; minimal
water, air, waste, material and soil sampling; audits, photography, and interpretation;
(b) Minimally-intrusive geological, geophysical, and geo-technical activities, including mapping and engineering surveys.
(c) Conducting Facility Audits, Environmental Site Assessments and Environmental Baseline Surveys, and,
(d) Vulnerability, risk, and structural integrity assessments of infrastructure.
OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES
Research, development, testing, and evaluation activities, or laboratory operations conducted within existing enclosed facilities consistent with previously established safety levels and in compliance with applicable federal, tribal, state, and local requirements to
protect the environment when it will result in no, or de minimis change in the use of the facility. If the operation will increase the extent of potential environmental impacts or is controversial, an EA (and possibly an EIS) is required.
Transportation of personnel, equipment, and evidentiary materials in wheeled vehicles over existing roads or jeep trails established by
federal, tribal, state, or local governments.
Use and operation of an existing structure that would be compatible with and similar in scope to its ongoing functional uses and
would be consistent with previously established safety levels and in compliance with applicable federal, tribal, state, or local requirements to protect the environment.
Support for or participation in short-lived, beneficial community projects that do not involve construction, or significant physical alteration of the environment. Examples include, but are not limited to:
(a) Earth Day activities,
(b) Cleanup of rivers and parkways, and
(c) Participation in ‘‘team building’’ activities.
Approval of recreational or public activities or events at a location typically used for that type and scope (size and intensity) of activity
that would not involve significant physical alteration of the environment. Examples include, but are not limited to:
(a) Picnics, and
(b) Interpretive programs for historic and cultural resources, such as programs in conjunction with state and tribal Historic Preservation Officers, or with local historic preservation or re-enactment groups.
Initial assignment or realignment of vehicles to existing operational facilities that have the capacity to accommodate such vehicles or
where supporting infrastructure changes will be minor.
Acquisition, installation, maintenance, operation, or evaluation of security equipment to protect people and materials at existing facilities and the eventual removal and disposal of that equipment in compliance with applicable federal, tribal, state, and local requirements to protect the environment. Examples of the equipment include, but are not limited to:
(a) Low-level x-ray devices,
(b) Cameras and biometric devices,
(c) Passive inspection devices,
(d) Detection or security systems, and,
(e) Access controls, screening devices, and traffic management systems.
(f) Alarms,
(g) Fences and temporary barriers,
(h) Preventative security systems.
Identification, inspections, surveys, or sampling, testing, seizures, quarantines, removals, sanitization, and monitoring of items that
cause little or no physical alteration of the environment.
Routine monitoring and surveillance activities that support law enforcement such as patrols, investigations, and intelligence gathering,
but not including any construction activities. This CE would primarily encompass a variety of daily activities performed by Treasury
emergency management, operations centers and security personnel.
REAL ESTATE ACTIVITIES
Acquisition of an interest in real property and all facilities on such property that is not within or adjacent to environmentally protected
areas, including interests less than a fee simple, by purchase, lease, assignment, easement, condemnation, or donation, which
does not result in a change in the functional use of the property.
Lease extensions, renewals, or succeeding leases for real property and all facilities on such property where there is no change in the
facility’s use and all environmental permits have been acquired and are current.
Transfer of administrative control over real property, including related personal property, between another federal agency and Treasury that does not result in a change in the functional use of the property.
Determination that real property is excess to the needs of the Treasury and, in the case of acquired real property, the subsequent reporting of such determination to the General Services Administration.
REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES
Minor renovations and additions to buildings, roads, grounds, equipment, and other facilities that do not result in a change in the
functional use of the real property (e.g. realigning interior spaces of an existing building, adding a small storage shed to an existing
building, retrofitting for energy conservation, or installing a small antenna on a building roof).
Routine upgrade, repair, maintenance, or replacement of equipment and vehicles, or other mobile assets (such as emergency generators) which is substantially the same as that routinely performed by private sector owners.
Repair and maintenance of Treasury-managed buildings, roads, grounds, and other facilities which do not result in a change in functional use (e.g. replacing a roof, painting a building, resurfacing a road, common pest control activities, restoration of trails and
firebreaks, culvert maintenance, grounds maintenance, existing security systems that do not require individual regulatory permits).
Reconstruction and/or repair by replacement of existing utilities in an existing right-of-way or easement.
CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, AND DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES
Installation, operation, maintenance, and removal of utility and communication systems (such as mobile antennas, data processing
cable, and similar electronic equipment) that use existing rights-of-way, easements, utility distribution systems, and/or associated
facilities.
Addition to an existing structure or improvement of land where all of the following conditions are met:
(a) The structure and proposed use are compatible with applicable federal, tribal, state, and local planning and zoning standards
and consistent with federally approved state coastal management programs,
(b) The site is in a previously disturbed location,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Aug 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
49844
E3 .........
E4 .........
E5 .........
E6 .........
E7 .........
CE# ......
F1 .........
F2 .........
F3 .........
CE# ......
G1 ........
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 163 / Friday, August 22, 2014 / Notices
(c) The proposed use will not substantially increase the number of motor vehicles at the facility or in the area,
(d) The site and scale of construction or improvement are consistent with those of existing, adjacent, or nearby buildings, and,
(e) The construction or improvement will not result in uses that exceed existing support infrastructure capacities (roads, sewer,
water, parking, etc.).
(f) The original footprint of a Treasury facility is not increased by more than 10 percent.
Acquisition, installation, operation, and maintenance of equipment, devices, and/or controls necessary to mitigate effects of Treasury’s
actions on health and the environment. Examples include but are not limited to:
(a) Installation of new emissions and pollution control equipment whose new emissions are minor or offset by emission credits or
by the removal of other equipment and it does not result in increased air emissions. The installation is done in compliance with
all Federal, state, local and tribal requirements. Examples include adding new equipment for printing currency while using credits to offset the emissions;
(b) Noise abatement measures, including construction of noise barriers, installation of noise control materials, or planting native
trees and/or native vegetation for use as a noise abatement measure, and,
(c) Devices to protect human or animal life, such as raptor electrocution prevention devices, fencing and grating to prevent accidental entry to hazardous or restricted areas, and rescue beacons to protect human life.
Removal or demolition, along with subsequent disposal of debris to permitted or authorized off-site locations, of non-historic buildings,
structures, other improvements, and/or equipment in compliance with applicable environmental and safety requirements.
Natural resource management activities to enhance native flora and fauna, including site preparation, and landscaping.
Reconstruction of roads on Treasury facilities, where runoff, erosion, and sedimentation issues are mitigated through implementation
of best management practices as described in EPA’s National Menu of Best Management Practices for Stormwater Phase II.
Construction of physical fitness and training trails for non-motorized use on Treasury facilities in areas that are not environmentally
protected, where run-off, erosion, and sedimentation are mitigated through implementation of best management practices.
HAZARDOUS/RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS
Routine procurement, transportation, distribution, use storage, and off-site disposal of hazardous materials that comply with all applicable federal, state, local, and tribal requirements.
Reuse, recycling, and disposal of solid, medical, radiological, and hazardous waste generated incidental to Treasury activities that
comply with applicable federal, state, local, and tribal requirements. Examples include but are not limited to:
(a) Appropriate treatment and disposal of medical waste conducted in accordance with all federal, state, local and tribal laws and
regulations,
(b) Temporary storage and disposal of solid waste, conducted in accordance with all federal, state, local and tribal laws and regulations,
(c) Disposal of radiological waste through manufacturer return and recycling programs, and,
(d) Hazardous waste minimization activities.
Use (that may include the processes of installation, maintenance, non-destructive testing, and calibration), transport, and storage of
hand-held, mobile or stationary instruments, containing sealed radiological and radioactive materials, to screen for possible security
violations in compliance with commercial manufacturers’ specifications, as well as applicable federal requirements to protect the
human environment. Examples of such instruments include but are not limited to:
(a) Gauging devices, tracers, and other analytical instruments,
(b) Instruments used in industrial radiography,
(c) Systems used in medical and veterinary practices and,
(d) Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approved, sealed, small source radiation devices for scanning vehicles and packages
where radiation exposure to employees or the public does not exceed 0.1 rem per year and where systems are maintained
within the NRC license parameters at existing facilities.
TRAINING AND EXERCISES
Training of security personnel using existing facilities where the training occurs in accordance with applicable permits and other requirements for the protection of the environment. This exclusion does not apply to training that involves the use of live chemical, biological, or radiological agents except when conducted at a location designed and constructed to contain the materials used for
that training. Examples include but are not limited to:
(a) Administrative or classroom training,
(b) Vehicle operation training,
(c) Security specialties,
(d) Crowd control training,
(e) Enforcement response, self-defense, and interdiction techniques training, and,
(f) Techniques for use in fingerprinting and drug analysis.
[FR Doc. 2014–19891 Filed 8–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request for Regulation Project
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury, as part of its continuing effort
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Aug 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)). The IRS is soliciting
comments concerning information
collection requirements related to
residence rulings involving U.S.
possessions.
Written comments should be
received on or before October 21, 2014
to be assured of consideration.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Direct all written comments
to Christie Preston, Internal Revenue
Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this regulation should be
directed to Kerry Dennis, at Internal
Revenue Service, Room 6129, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20224, or through the Internet, at
Kerry.Dennis@irs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Residence Rulings Involving
U.S. Possessions.
OMB Number: 1545–1930.
Regulation Project Number: T.D. 9248.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49834-49844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19891]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Treasury Directive 75-02 and Directive Publication 75-02,
Department of the Treasury National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Program
AGENCY: Office of Environment, Health, and Safety, Departmental
Offices, Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury (Treasury) is publishing this
notice to provide an opportunity for public comment on its draft
directive and accompanying guidelines containing policy and procedures
for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA),
as amended, Executive Order 11514, as amended, Executive Order 12114,
and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508). Pursuant to
CEQ regulations, Treasury is soliciting comments from members of the
interested public.
DATES: Comments must be received by October 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions relating to this Notice to: Department of
the Treasury, Office of Environment, Health, and Safety, Treasury
Department Annex, Room 6400K, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC, 20220. Alternatively, comments relating to this Notice may be
submitted electronically via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clayt Lauter, Director, Office of
Environment, Health & Safety, at 202-622-1712 (not a toll-free number)
or clayt.lauter@treasury.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
The Department of the Treasury encourages interested persons to
submit written data, views, or comments. Persons submitting comments
should please include their name, address, and other appropriate
contact information. You may submit your comments and material by one
of the means listed under ADDRESSES. If you submit them by mail, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. Treasury will consider all comments
received during the comment period.
Background
This directive and accompanying guidelines establish policy and
procedures to ensure the integration of environmental considerations
into the mission of the Department of the Treasury. They outline roles
and responsibilities for compliance with NEPA, and establish a
framework for the balanced and proactive consideration of NEPA in the
planning and execution of Treasury activities.
Treasury is composed of nine bureaus and three Inspectors General
Offices: Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP), Bureau of the Fiscal
Service (BFS), Departmental Offices (DO), Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network (FinCEN), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), United States Mint
(Mint), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB), Community Development Financial
Institutions Fund (CDFI), Special Inspector General, Troubled Asset
Relief Program (SIGTARP), Office of the Inspector General (OIG), and
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA). Note: This
directive does not apply to CDFI. See 12 CFR part 1815, ``Environmental
Quality.'' Treasury's responsibilities include managing federal
finances; collecting taxes, and paying bills of the United States;
producing currency and coinage; managing government accounts
[[Page 49835]]
and the public debt; supervising national banks and thrift
institutions; advising on domestic and international financial,
monetary, economic, trade and tax policy; enforcing federal finance and
tax laws; and investigating and prosecuting tax evaders,
counterfeiters, and forgers.
The policies and procedures in the proposed directive and
accompanying guidelines will assist Treasury in evaluating its actions
in light of the requirements in CEQ regulations and NEPA. These
substantive or procedural requirements apply to the program planning
and project development in all Treasury bureaus and offices. In
particular, there is special consideration of the requirements for
public involvement, dispute resolution, intergovernmental coordination,
emergency procedures, and handling of sensitive information in Treasury
decisionmaking.
This proposed directive and accompanying guidelines include
processes for preparing categorical exclusions, environmental
assessments, findings of no significant impact, and environmental
impact statements. Treasury proposes to use these in conjunction with
NEPA, the CEQ regulations at 40 CFR parts 1500-1508, and other
pertinent environmental regulations, Executive Orders, statutes, and
laws developed for the consideration of environmental impacts of
federal actions.
The directive and guidelines were established by reviewing the
historical actions and missions of all the Treasury bureaus. They were
prepared by bureau representatives with environmental policy and
operations responsibilities, under the direction of the Office of
Environment, Health, and Safety.
The group reviewed existing law and requirements, agency policies,
existing guidance on the implementation of NEPA from the Council on
Environmental Quality, and it examined policies and procedures from
other federal agencies to identify policies that could be appropriate
for the missions of the Treasury Department.
An area of emphasis included the development of appropriate
categorical exclusions. The group considered that Treasury's activities
are performed primarily in office-type environmental surroundings, but
in the case of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, and United States
Mint, manufacturing settings predominate. Likewise, the group examined
existing categorical exclusions from other federal departments to
determine whether any might be appropriate for Treasury. The resulting
list of proposed categorical exclusions is included in Appendix 1 of
the proposed guidelines.
The Department of the Treasury solicits public review of this
document and will review and consider those comments before this
directive and accompanying guidelines are final.
Nani Coloretti,
Assistant Secretary for Management.
TREASURY DIRECTIVE: 75-02
Date: TBD
Sunset Review: TBD
SUBJECT: Department of the Treasury National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Program
1. PURPOSE. This directive establishes policy, and assigns
responsibilities for implementing the Council on Environmental
Quality's (CEQ) regulations for the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) found at 40 CFR parts 1500-1508.
2. SCOPE. This directive applies to all bureaus, the Departmental
Offices, and the Office of Inspector General (OIG), Office of the
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), and Office
of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program
(SIGTARP) (collectively referred to as ``bureaus''). The provisions of
this directive shall not be construed to interfere with or impede the
authorities or independence of the Department's Inspectors General. Nor
shall they be interpreted to govern environmental considerations
related to awards under the Community Development Financial
Institutions (CDFI) Fund programs as its NEPA program is regulated
under 12 CFR part 1815, ``Environmental Quality.''
3. POLICY.
a. The Department of the Treasury (Treasury) will consider
environmental quality as equal with economic, social, and other
relevant factors in program development and decision making processes.
Additionally, Treasury will fully evaluate its actions to ensure
compliance with the requirements of NEPA and the CEQ regulations, where
applicable.
b. In assessing the potential environmental impacts of its actions,
Treasury will consult early with appropriate federal, state, and local
agencies and other organizations to provide decision-makers with the
technical and other aspects of environmental planning.
c. When adverse environmental impacts are identified, either direct
or indirect, an examination will be made of alternative courses of
action, including their potential environmental impacts. The objective
of the environmental review will be to develop a feasible alternative
with the least adverse environmental impact. The alternative of not
proceeding with the proposal will also be considered.
4. TERMINOLOGY. The terminology and definitions contained in 40 CFR
part 1508 shall be employed for the purposes of this directive.
5. RESPONSIBILITIES.
a. The Assistant Secretary for Management (ASM) has the authority
to integrate fully all applicable environmental laws and regulations
into Treasury's missions and activities. The ASM shall:
(1) seek to ensure that all actions taken by Treasury, with respect
to the fulfillment of NEPA and the CEQ regulations, are duly
coordinated with appropriate federal, state, and local entities;
(2) provide guidance on environmental policy and requirements;
(3) assist in reviewing and assessing the environmental impact of
proposed Treasury actions;
(4) provide guidance in the consideration, application,
preparation, scoping, processing, and distribution of categorical
exclusions (CEs), environmental assessments (EAs) and environmental
impact statements (EISs);
(5) receive for clearance action all CEs, EAs, and EISs, draft and
final, originating in Treasury;
(6) receive all CEs, EAs, and EISs submitted by other agencies that
address Treasury actions and coordinate the appropriate review and
reply;
(7) perform such other functions as are specified in this directive
or are appropriate under the CEQ regulations or other instructions or
recommendations of agencies charged with carrying out the duties of the
statutes listed in Section 8; and
(8) ensure that EAs, EISs and Findings of No Significant Impact
(FONSIs) prepared under Treasury's jurisdiction are accessible to the
public from the respective bureau's Web site for five years from the
date of issuance.
b. Heads of Bureaus shall:
(1) prepare, and circulate within Treasury for the consideration of
others, EAs and EISs when an action or policy area in question falls
under their jurisdiction;
(2) issue any supplementary procedures consistent with this
directive for the implementation of NEPA which the bureaus deem
necessary. Procedures shall be addressed in accordance with the CEQ
regulations (Section 1507.3) and this directive and shall be submitted
to the
[[Page 49836]]
ASM through the OGC for coordination, review and concurrence.
(3) ensure that communications with CEQ, and other government
agencies or individuals on matters concerning Treasury compliance with
NEPA and the relevant CEQ regulations are signed by, or coordinated
with, the ASM through the OGC. Examples of such communications are
letters transmitting CEs, EAs, and EISs, reports, and all Departmental
contacts relevant to Treasury compliance with NEPA and the CEQ
regulations. Unless special circumstances indicate that a different
officer should act, communications announcing decisions to prepare EAs
or EISs, requesting comments on draft statements, or transmitting final
statements for the information of agencies, shall also be signed by the
ASM and, in the case of a non-Treasury entity, shall be addressed to
its ASM or equivalent official;
(4) ensure that mitigation measures that have been identified in
decision documents (e.g., Records of Decision (RODs)) are carried out.
Bureaus shall institute procedures in coordination with their
environmental program manager to ensure that the mitigation measures
are carried out (Sections 1505.2(c) and 1505.3, CEQ regulations, and
CEQ Guidance: Appropriate Use of Mitigation and Monitoring and
Appropriate Use of Mitigated Finding of No Significant Impact, issued
January 14, 2011). Further, the mitigation must be monitored to assure
that it is having the intended environmental benefits;
(5) provide for early involvement in all actions which require some
form of federal approval as required by Sections 1501.2(d), and 1500.5
(a, f) of the CEQ regulations;
(6) ensure public involvement in the NEPA process pursuant to
Section 1506.6 of the CEQ regulations. Communicate timely and provide
electronic documents related to public involvement with the ASM through
the Treasury Departmental Offices Environmental Program Manager (EPM)
located in the OEHS.
(7) prepare legislative EISs. Bureaus with primary responsibility
for legislative proposals originating in Treasury, which will
significantly affect the quality of the human environment, shall be
responsible for preparing legislative EISs. Close coordination shall be
maintained between the ASM through the EPM and bureaus concerning the
legislative proposals;
(8) designate a NEPA Point-of-Contact and alternate in their Bureau
to coordinate with the EPM;
(9) perform such other functions as specified in this directive;
and
(10) be responsive to requests from the CEQ and other relevant
agencies for reports or other information in connection with the
implementation of NEPA, and for the preparation and circulation of EISs
as required by Section 1506.9 of the CEQ regulations.
c. The Bureau NEPA Points-of-Contact shall collaborate with the EPM
to:
(1) identify actions within their organization requiring an EA or
EIS;
(2) ensure that each required assessment or statement is prepared
in a timely manner and with the prescribed content by appropriate
staff;
(3) ensure compliance with the requirements of NEPA, the CEQ
regulations, and this directive by coordinating the review of such
statements and assessments, and by maintaining compliance with all
applicable scheduling, scoping, consultation, circulation, public
hearing, and publication requirements;
(4) maintain effective communication and consultation with the OGC
and inform key officials of current developments in environmental
policy and programs;
(5) ensure that the assessment of the environmental impact of
actions concerning various areas of Treasury policy and operations, and
the preparation of EAs and EISs relating thereto, shall be coordinated
with the CEQ;
(6) ensure that all NEPA documents releasable to the public are
provided to the OGC for review prior to posting on the Department's
public Web site; and
(7) participate in and/or monitor the General Services
Administration's (GSA) NEPA activities involving Treasury facilities.
d. The EPM shall receive all EAs and EISs submitted by other
agencies for comment and coordinate the appropriate review and reply.
If any bureau receives a request for comment directly from another
agency, the request, together with the respective documents, shall be
referred to the Departmental Offices (DO) Environmental Program Manager
for appropriate action. Department of the Treasury comments should be
confined to matters within the jurisdiction or expertise of Treasury.
However, comments need not be limited to environmental aspects, but may
relate to fiscal, economic, and non-governmental matters of concern to
the Department.
6. IMPLEMENTATION. Guidance and procedures on implementing this
directive are found in Treasury Directive Publication (TD P) 75-02.
7. AUTHORITIES.
a. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
4321, et seq.
b. National Environmental Policy Act Regulations, Council on
Environmental Quality, 40 CFR parts 1500-1508.
8. REFERENCES.
a. CEQ NEPA Guidance https://ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/regs/guidance.html.
b. Council on Environmental Quality, Aligning NEPA Processes with
Environmental Management Systems--A Guide for NEPA and EMS
Practitioners, dated April 2007, https://ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/NEPA_EMS_Guide_final_Apr2007.pdf.
c. The NEPA Task Force Report to the Council on Environmental
Quality: Modernizing NEPA Implementation, dated September 2003, https://ceq.hss.doe.gov/ntf/report/.
d. Treasury Directive 75-09, Environmental, Health, and Safety
Management, Energy, and Sustainability Program, dated August 13, 2013.
e. Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 74701 et. seq.
f. Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et. seq.
g. Coastal Zone Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1451 et. seq.
h. Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et. seq.
i. Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970, as amended, 42
U.S.C. 4321-4335.
j. Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C.1251 et. seq.
k. Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 1361 et. seq.
l. National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470 et. seq.
m. National Marine Sanctuaries Act, 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.
n. Executive Order 11514, ``Protection and Enhancement of
Environmental Quality,'' dated March 5, 1970, as amended by E.O. 11991,
dated May 24, 1977.
o. Executive Order 11988, ``Floodplain Management,'' dated May 24,
1977.
p. Executive Order 11990, ``Protection of Wetlands,'' dated May 24,
1977 (42 FR 26961), as amended by Executive Order 12608, dated
September 9, 1987.
q. Executive Order 12114, ``Environmental Effects Abroad of Major
Federal Actions,'' dated January 4, 1979, (44 FR 1957).
r. Executive Order 12898, ``Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations,'' dated February 11, 1994, (59 FR 7629).
s. Executive Order 13423, ``Strengthening Federal Environmental,
Energy, and Transportation Management,'' dated January 24, 2007.
[[Page 49837]]
t. Executive Order 13514, ``Federal Leadership in Environmental,
Energy, and Economic Performance,'' dated October 5, 2009.
9. CANCELLATION. Treasury Directive 75-02, ``Department of the
Treasury Environmental Quality Program,'' dated September 25, 1990, is
superseded.
10. EMERGENCIES. In the event of emergencies which may require a
bureau to take an action with significant environmental impacts without
complying with this directive or the CEQ regulations, the CEQ should be
consulted, through the EPM, about alternative arrangements (Section
1506.11, CEQ regulations).
11. OFFICES OF PRIMARY INTEREST. The Office of Environment, Health,
and Safety. Office of Assistant Secretary for Management.
Nani Coloretti, Assistant Secretary for Management
Treasury Directive Publication 75-02
SUBJECT: Guidelines for Implementing the Department of the Treasury
National Environmental Policy Act Program
1. PURPOSE. This Treasury Directive Publication (Publication)
provides guidelines and procedures for the effective implementation of
the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations on the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
2. SCOPE. This directive publication applies to all bureaus, the
Departmental Offices, and the Office of Inspector General (OIG), Office
of the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), and
Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief
Program (SIGTARP) (collectively referred to as ``bureaus''). The
provisions of this directive shall not be construed to interfere with
or impede the authorities or independence of the Department's
Inspectors General. Nor shall they be interpreted to govern
environmental considerations related to awards under the Community
Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund programs as its NEPA
program is regulated under 12 CFR part 1815, ``Environmental Quality.''
3. RELATED DIRECTIVE. Treasury Directive 75-02, ``Department of the
Treasury National Environmental Policy Act Program.''
4. RESPONSIBLE OFFICE. Office of Environment, Health, and Safety
(OEHS) within the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Management and Budget (DASMB).
5. EARLY INVOLVEMENT IN ACTIONS INITIATED BY PRIVATE OR OTHER NON-
FEDERAL ENTITIES.
(1) To implement the requirements of Section 1501.2(d) of the CEQ
regulations with respect to actions planned by private or other non-
federal entities that require some form of federal approval (for
example, loans, grants, or approvals in connection with bureau managed
or regulated facilities), each bureau shall:
(a) prepare, within a reasonable timeframe, generic guidelines
describing the scope and level of environmental information required
from applicants as a basis for evaluating their proposed actions and
make these guidelines available;
(b) provide such guidance on a project-by-project basis to
applicants seeking assistance from the bureau;
(c) upon receipt of an application for bureau approval, or
notification that an application will be filed, consult as required
with other appropriate parties to initiate and coordinate any necessary
environmental analyses;
(d) consult with appropriate federal, regional state and local
agencies and other potentially interested parties during preliminary
planning stages to ensure that all environmental factors are
identified;
(e) communicate and consult in a timely manner with the ASM through
the Treasury Departmental Offices Environmental Program Manager (EPM)
located in the OEHS.
(2) The responsible bureau shall independently evaluate the
information submitted by the applicant and, if it accepts that
information, shall be responsible for its accuracy. If the bureau
chooses to use the information submitted by the applicant in an EA or
EIS, it must include the names of the persons responsible for the
independent evaluation in a list of preparers (Section 1506.5(a), CEQ
regulations).
(3) To facilitate compliance with the requirements above, private
applicants and other non-federal entities should be advised to:
(a) contact Treasury as early as possible in the planning process
for guidance on the scope and level of environmental information which
may be required to be submitted in support of their application;
(b) conduct any studies which are deemed necessary and appropriate
by Treasury to determine the impact of the proposed action on the human
environment;
(c) submit applications for necessary federal, regional, state and
local approvals as early as possible in the planning process;
(d) notify Treasury as early as possible of any other federal,
regional, state, local and Indian tribe actions required for project
completion so that Treasury may coordinate all federal environmental
reviews; and
(e) notify Treasury of any known parties potentially affected by,
or interested in, the proposed action.
6. THE NEPA PROCESS.
a. Classes of Action Requiring Similar Treatment Under NEPA.
(1) NEPA actions undertaken by Treasury may be broken down into
three main classes of action:
(a) those actions normally requiring EISs, such as proposals for
major Treasury building projects involving large land acquisition and
construction of large facilities, or for proposed legislation which may
have a significant effect on the environment;
(b) those actions normally requiring EAs, but not necessarily EISs,
such as proposals to build a new warehouse for non-hazardous storage,
production of next generation currency, or approval of plastic liquor
bottles or ethanol permits; and
(c) those actions requiring neither an EIS nor an EA; e.g.,
categorical exclusions (CEs). CEs are actions which meet the definition
contained in 40 CFR 1508.4, and, based on past experience with similar
actions, typically do not involve significant environmental impacts,
either individually or cumulatively.
(2) Treasury does not, in general, have responsibility for actions
which will have a significant effect on the quality of the human
environment. Decisions as to whether environmental documentation is
required shall be made on a case-by-case basis by the head of the
bureau involved in conjunction with the ASM through the EPM. Additional
guidance may be obtained from the CEQ.
(3) In the event a proposed action falls within either category (a)
or (b) of sub-paragraph (1) above, the bureau should take the
appropriate steps outlined in sections 8 and 9 below. If the proposed
action is categorically excluded, then the bureau may proceed with
implementing the action.
b. Integrating the NEPA Process with Bureau Planning and Decision
Making.
(1) The ultimate purpose of NEPA is to ensure that public officials
make decisions based on an understanding of the environmental
consequences of proposed major federal actions. The means provided by
NEPA to achieve its goals is called the ``NEPA process'' and is
outlined in Sec. 102 of NEPA [42 USC Sec. 4332].
(2) At all appropriate facilities and organizational levels,
bureaus shall integrate their NEPA process within their environmental
management system (EMS). To comply with NEPA,
[[Page 49838]]
bureaus must ensure that the NEPA process is integrated with bureau
planning and decision making as early as possible (Sections 1501.2 and
1505.1, CEQ Regulations). Accordingly, bureaus shall:
(a) ensure, where necessary, final EAs or EISs and related
documents accompany proposals through the entire review process;
(b) consider and balance pertinent non-environmental factors with
those relating to the environment and consider all practicable
alternatives and mitigation measures identified in the environmental
documents;
(c) make no decision on a proposed action until the applicable
timing requirements have been met;
(d) communicate and consult in a timely manner with the ASM through
the EPM; and
(e) prepare a concise public record of the decision at the time it
is made, or, for a legislative EIS, at the time of its recommendation
to Congress. This record will be prepared in accordance with Section
1505.2 of the CEQ regulations.
7. DOCUMENTING A DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
(CE).
a. The head of the bureau shall prepare a Record of Categorical
Exclusion Determination when a category of actions repeatedly
demonstrates no significant effect on the human environment or the
agency has other evidence that a CE is warranted. This might include
through scientific evidence or review of other agencies' categorical
exclusions.
Appendix 1 lists bureau actions which Treasury has determined do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. To find that a proposal is categorically excluded, the
bureau shall determine the following:
(1) The proposal fits within one of the classes of actions that are
listed in Appendix 1; and
(2) There are no extraordinary circumstances related to the
proposed action that are present that may have a significant
environmental effect. The extraordinary circumstances set forth by the
Department of the Treasury are as follows:
(a) An action that results in a project of greater scope or size
than typically experienced for a particular category of actions;
(b) Highly controversial environmental effects exist where
controversy is defined as: voiced opposition from state/local agencies/
tribes, an unusual level of concern raised by the public, or use of
unproven technology with uncertain environmental effects;
(c) Potential impacts to areas of critical environmental concern
are found, including, but not limited to, prime or unique agricultural
lands, wetlands or floodplains, coastal zones, wilderness areas,
aquifers, or wild and scenic rivers;
(d) Potential effects to properties or archaeological resources
exist, which are either listed or eligible for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places (note: this extraordinary circumstance is
not applicable if a separate Section 106 process under the National
Historic Preservation Act has been completed resulting in the
concurrence of the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) or the
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) or the signing of a
Memorandum of Agreement with the SHPO or THPO and/or the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation);
(e) Adverse effects exist on species endangered, threatened, or
proposed to be listed on the List of Endangered or Threatened Species
or located in an area designated as Critical Habitat for an endangered
or threatened species or other protected resources;
(f) Possible violation exists of federal, state, local, or tribal
law for the protection of the environment;
(g) Inconsistencies exist with any federal, state, local or tribal
law, requirement or administrative determination relating to the
environmental aspects of the action;
(h) Potential for degradation exists, even though slight, of
already existing poor environmental conditions;
(i) Presence of hazardous or toxic substances exists at levels
which exceed federal, state, local or tribal law or regulations or
standards requiring action or attention;
(j) Potential exists for adverse effects on health or safety; or
(k) Potential for significant cumulative impacts exist when the
proposed action is combined with other past, present, and reasonably
foreseeable future actions, even though the impacts of the proposed
action may not be significant by themselves.
(l) The degree to which the possible effects on the human
environment are highly uncertain or involve unique or unknown risks.
(m) The degree to which the action may establish a precedent for
future actions with significant effects or represents a decision in
principle about a future consideration.
b. When it is determined that an activity warrants a CE, the
following is required to be documented by the bureau with an electronic
copy sent to the EPM:
(1) A completed Environmental Analysis for Categorical Exclusions
form;
(2) A reference to the type of CE being applied. (Appendix 1);
(3) A determination statement which shall be signed and dated by
the bureau head. [Suggested statement language: Based on my review of
information conveyed to me and attached concerning the proposed action
designation of a categorical exclusion, I have determined that the
proposed action is categorically excluded under Treasury Directive 75-
02 and the proposed action is not subject to any extraordinary
circumstances and is hereby precluded from further NEPA review.]
c. The EPM will post the final document identifying the CE on the
Treasury Department's public Web site.
8. WRITING A DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
(EA).
a. The head of the bureau shall prepare the assessment. The
assessment shall be submitted electronically to the ASM through the EPM
for review and approval. The EPM will place the final document(s) on
the Department of the Treasury Public NEPA Web site.
b. To the extent practicable, other agencies, applicants, and the
public should be involved in preparing the EA (see also Section
1501.4.b, CEQ regulations). Responsibility for information provided by
applicants for use in preparing an EA or for assessments prepared by an
applicant for an organization is outlined in Section 1506.5(b) of the
CEQ regulations.
c. Treasury EAs shall:
(1) describe the proposed action and the need for it;
(2) briefly describe the environmental impacts of, and alternatives
to, the proposed action, including mitigation measures;
(3) identify and analyze impacts associated with energy (including
alternative energy sources) and climate change;
(4) list the agencies and persons consulted;
(5) provide a brief analysis, based upon the above evidence, for
determining whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS),
or a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI); and
(6) make EAs and findings of no significant impact available to the
public.
d. NEPA requires that for all proposals for legislation or other
major
[[Page 49839]]
federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human
environment, the environmental implications of the proposal are to be
explored.
e. Whenever a Bureau matter, including the initiation of any action
or program previously discontinued, could constitute a major federal
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, an
EA shall be prepared as soon as possible, and at all times prior to the
decision to take or to continue the action.
f. An EA need not be prepared if an organization has decided to
prepare an EIS on a proposed action.
9. WRITING A DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
STATEMENT (EIS).
a. Once it is determined that an organization shall be responsible
for preparing an EIS, a notice of intent shall be promptly published in
the Federal Register. The EPM will provide consultation while the
organization will provide necessary communication to the EPM in order
to keep the ASM advised.
b. The scoping process, outlined in Section 1501.7 of the CEQ
regulations, shall be used for determining the scope of issues to be
addressed and for identifying the significant issues related to the
proposed action. The organization involved and in consultation with the
SAO through the EPM, shall be responsible for carrying out the scoping
process in accordance with the CEQ regulations.
c. Section 1501.5(a) of the CEQ regulations provides that a lead
agency shall supervise the preparation of an EIS if more than one
federal agency either proposes or is involved in the same action, or is
involved in a group of actions directly related to each other because
of their functional interdependence or geographical proximity (see also
Section 1506.2, CEQ regulations).
d. In the event the preparation of an EIS for a proposed
organization action requires the designation of a lead agency for
either of these reasons, the head of the organization shall contact the
EPM for guidance. The bureaus shall seek out and coordinate with
Cooperating Agencies (Federal, tribal or state) for EIS activities as
outlined in 1501.5 and 1501.6. Any communications with other agencies
which deal with lead agency designations shall be coordinated with the
EPM. The criteria and responsibilities for lead and cooperating
agencies are outlined in Section 1501.5 and 1501.6 of the CEQ
regulations, respectively.
e. EISs shall first be issued in draft, for comment by government
agencies and the public. Final EISs that address comments received
shall then be issued. Requirements for preparing and circulating draft
and final statements (Part 1502 of the CEQ regulations) are as follows:
(1) Timing.
(a) The timing of the preparation, circulation, submission, and
public availability of EISs is of great importance. EISs are not
intended to be justification documents for proposed actions but are to
be objective evaluations of proposed actions and their alternatives in
light of all reasonably pertinent environmental considerations (Section
1502.2(g), CEQ regulations).
(b) EISs are then filed with the EPA. The EPA, in turn, publishes a
weekly notice in the Federal Register of the EISs filed during the
preceding week. No decisions on the proposed action may be made by the
office/bureau until the following time periods calculated from the
publication date of the EPA notice have been observed.
1. Not less than 45 days for comment on draft statements (Section
1506.10(c), CEQ regulations).
2. Not less than 90 days and 30 days, respectively, for public
availability of draft and final statements prior to administrative
actions. These periods may run concurrently (Section 1506.10(b) and
(c), CEQ regulations).
3. Not less than 15 days for public availability of draft
statements prior to any relevant hearing on proposed administrative
actions (Section 1506.6(c)(2), CEQ regulations).
4. The time periods prescribed in paragraphs 1 through 3 may be
extended or reduced, in specific instances, in accordance with Section
1506.10 of the CEQ regulations.
(2) Securing Information.
(a) The full resources of Treasury should be utilized in developing
the factual and analytic information and reference sources required in
the preparation of an EIS. The assistance of other agencies, federal,
state, tribal, or local, with jurisdiction by law or special expertise
concerning the environmental impacts involved should also be sought.
Further, in accordance with Section 1506.3 of the CEQ regulations,
bureaus may adopt, in whole or in part, a draft or final EIS prepared
elsewhere in the Department or by another federal agency.
(b) If the organization is having difficulty in securing requisite
information or needs guidance, the EPM will assist in locating needed
information through the CEQ, EPA, or other appropriate sources.
(3) Writing and Content.
(a) EISs are to be written in plain language, and may include
appropriate graphics, so that bureau decision makers and the public can
readily understand them (Section 1502.8, CEQ regulations).
(b) The ``scoping'' process shall be utilized so that only
significant issues related to the proposed action are analyzed in
depth. (Section 1501.7, CEQ regulations).
(c) EISs should be as concise as possible while still providing
adequate, meaningful, and factual information and analysis to permit an
evaluation of the proposed action from the environmental standpoint.
Their length shall normally be less than 150 pages, and for proposals
of unusual scope or complexity, less than 300 pages (Section 1502.7,
CEQ regulations). ``Tiering'' (Section 1502.20, CEQ regulations) and
``incorporation by reference'' (Section 1502.21, CEQ regulations)
should be used, where appropriate, to insure that statements are kept
concise.
(d) Quantitative information about the proposed action, including
actual or estimated data on its probable effects, should be included to
the greatest extent practicable. If a cost-benefit analysis of the
proposed action has been prepared, it should be incorporated by
reference or appended to the EIS as an aid in evaluating the
environmental consequences (Section 1502.23, CEQ regulations).
(e) All reasonable alternatives and their environmental impacts
shall be addressed, to include identifying and analyzing impacts
associated with energy (including alternative energy sources) and
climate change, regardless of whether or not they are not within the
authority of the Department (Section 1502.14(c), CEQ regulations).
Appropriate mitigation measures shall also be discussed (Section
1502.14(f), CEQ regulations).
(f) The basic content requirements for EISs are set forth in
Section 1502.10-25 of the CEQ regulations. Bureaus shall follow the
prescribed outline and content requirements described therein as
closely as is feasible in each particular case.
(g) Draft and final statements should refer to the underlying
studies, reports, and other documents considered by the preparing
organization and indicate how such documents may be obtained. With the
exception of standard reference documents, such as congressional
materials, the bureau should maintain a file of the respective
documents which may be consulted by interested persons. If especially
significant documents are attached to the EIS, care should be taken to
insure that the statement remains an
[[Page 49840]]
essentially self-contained instrument easily understood without the
need for undue cross-reference.
(4) Utilizing Contractors. A contractor may be selected to prepare
the EIS. Organization responsibility, in the event a contractor is
employed, is outlined in Section 1506.5 (c) of the CEQ regulations. The
work of a contractor, however, must be fully reviewed, endorsed, and
fully adopted by the Department of the Treasury for it to be used as
the NEPA document of the agency.
(5) Circulation. The entire draft and final EIS shall be circulated
in accordance with Section 1502.19 of the CEQ regulations. Appendices
and unchanged statements may be treated in accordance with Sections
1502.18(d) and 1503.4(c). If the statement is unusually long, the
organization may circulate the summary instead (Section 1502.12, CEQ
regulations), except that the entire statement shall be furnished as
specified in Section 1502.19.
(6) Public Involvement. Section 1506.6 of the CEQ regulations
requires public involvement in the NEPA process. The relevant bureau
will communicate timely and provide electronic documents related to
public involvement with the ASM through the OGC, who will be available
for consultation with the bureau.
(a) To comply with this requirement, bureaus shall:
1. Provide for public hearings whenever appropriate. Whenever,
under the normal policies or procedures of the organization a hearing
would be held on a matter requiring the preparation of an EIS, the
environmental aspects should be included in the hearing. In other
cases, the question of whether a hearing should be held with respect to
an environmental matter shall be determined in accordance with the
criteria set forth in Section 1506.6 (c) of the CEQ regulations.
Normally, all hearings contemplated in this paragraph should be based
on a draft EIS which should be made available to the public at least 15
days before the hearing.
2. Provide public notice of NEPA-related hearings, public meetings,
and the availability of environmental documents. The notice should be
provided by the means most likely to inform those persons and agencies
that may be interested or affected.
(a) Section 1506.6(b) of the CEQ regulations provides notification
methods that may be used, including publication in local newspapers of
general circulation, notice to state and local clearinghouses, and
notice by mail.
(b) A notice of the filing and availability of each EIS, draft and
final, shall be inserted in the Federal Register by the responsible
organization.
3. Make EISs and EAs, along with any comments and underlying
documents, available to the public on the Department of the Treasury
public Web site through a link to their bureau public Web site and
pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), the
Department's regulations there under (31 CFR part 1), and the
disclosure regulations of the bureau (Section 1506.6(f), CEQ
regulations).
(a) These materials are to be placed in the public reading room of
the Treasury Library in Washington, DC, and the public reading rooms of
the organization if any are maintained. The documents may be read or
copied during working hours.
(b) Copies to be made available to the public shall normally be
provided on paper meeting the requirements of Executive Order (E.O.)
13423 or superseding E.O. and without charge. However, when such costs
are significant, the organization may, in accordance with Section
1506.6(f) of the CEQ regulations, establish a fee which shall not
exceed the actual cost of reproducing the copies. Multi-page documents
are to be duplex printed (double-sided), unless otherwise required.
(6) Commenting.
(a) With respect to draft EISs, it is essential that the
organizations consult with, and take account of the comments of,
appropriate federal, state and local agencies. This shall involve the
formal solicitation of review and comments on the draft statement
(Section 1503.1, CEQ regulations). When appropriate, procedures for
obtaining state and local comments shall be utilized (Section
1503.1(a)(2), CEQ regulations).
(b) Comments should also be requested from individuals or
organizations which appear to have a special interest in some
significant environmental aspect of the proposed action (Section
1503.1(a)(4), CEQ regulations).
(c) All substantive comments received on draft EISs (or summaries
thereof where the comments are exceptionally long), should be attached
to final EIS, whether or not each such comment is thought to merit
individual discussion in the text of the statement (Section 1503.4(b),
CEQ regulations).
(d) Section 102(2)(C) of NEPA requires that the final EIS shall
accompany the proposal to which it relates through the agency review
process.
10. ACTIONS EXCLUDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CEQ REGULATIONS. In
accordance with CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1500.6 and 1508.18(a)), some
classes of actions may be thought to not trigger NEPA. Consultation
with the Office of General Counsel must be initiated at the earliest
time such an issue arises.
11. OTHER NEPA REGULATORY PROVISIONS.
(a) Emergency Actions/Alternate Arrangements: In the event of an
emergency situation, Treasury may be required to take an action to
prevent or reduce the risk to the environment, public health, or safety
that may impact the human environment without evaluating those impacts
under NEPA. 40 CFR 1506 provides that CEQ may grant alternative
arrangements for, but not eliminate, NEPA compliance where a national
emergency, disaster, or similar great urgency makes it necessary to
take actions that merit an environmental impact statement without
observing all the provisions of CEQ regulations. The processing times
may be reduced or, if the emergency situation warrants, preparation and
processing of environmental impact statements may be abbreviated. Upon
learning of the emergency situation, the EPM will immediately inform
CEQ of the emergency situation when the proposed Treasury action is
expected to result in significant impacts on the human environment. In
some cases, the emergency action may be covered by an existing NEPA
analysis or an exemption. In other cases, it may not be covered. In
these cases, the CEQ (in consultation with EPM) will establish
alternate arrangements for NEPA compliance. The EPM will provide
continued follow-up consultation with CEQ throughout the duration of
the emergency situation. The provisions of this section do not apply to
actions taken after the emergency situation has been resolved or those
related to recovery operations. In an EIS where the proposed action is
not expected to result in significant impacts on the human environment,
the EPM ensures that the appropriate NEPA documentation is prepared to
the extent practicable before or concurrent with the emergency actions
required to control the emergency and before any follow-up actions are
taken (40 CFR 1506.11).
(b) Incomplete or Unavailable Information: If Treasury determines
that there is incomplete or unavailable information while evaluating
reasonably foreseeable significant adverse effects on the human
environment in an EIS, it shall make clear that that such information
is lacking.
[[Page 49841]]
If this information is essential to choosing a reasonable
alternative and obtaining it is not cost prohibitive, Treasury shall
include that information. If the information relevant to reasonably
foreseeable significant adverse impacts cannot be obtained because the
overall costs of obtaining it are exorbitant or the means to obtain it
are not known, Treasury shall include within the EIS:
(1) a statement that such information is incomplete or unavailable;
(2) a statement of the relevance of the incomplete or unavailable
information to evaluating reasonably foreseeable significant adverse
impacts on the human environment;
(3) a summary of existing credible scientific evidence which is
relevant to evaluating the reasonably foreseeable significant adverse
impacts on the human environment; and
(4) Treasury's evaluation of such impacts based upon theoretical
approaches or research methods generally accepted in the scientific
community. For the purposes of this section, ``reasonably foreseeable''
includes impacts which have catastrophic consequences, even if their
probability of occurrence is low, provided that the analysis of the
impacts is supported by credible scientific evidence, is not based on
pure conjecture, and is within the rule of reason.
(c) Incorporation by Reference: In order to reduce the size of
documents, whenever possible, Treasury will incorporate material by
reference into an EIS providing it will not impede Treasury and public
review of the action. The incorporated material shall be cited in the
document and its content briefly described. No material may be
incorporated by reference unless it is reasonably available for
inspection by potentially interested persons within the time allowed
for comment. Material based on proprietary data which is itself not
available for review and comment shall not be incorporated by
reference.
12. REQUIREMENTS FOR FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION OF
WETLANDS. Executive Order 11988, ``Floodplain Management,'' and
Executive Order 11990, ``Protection of Wetlands,'' direct federal
agencies to ensure that the potential effects of any proposed actions
they may take in a floodplain or wetland are considered and evaluated
in their decision making.
In a Federal Register notice of May 24, 1978 (43 FR 22311),
Treasury advised that, as a general rule, it does not engage in
activities which would impact on floodplain or wetlands. It was further
stated that no separate Treasury procedures implementing these
Executive Orders would be issued, but rather that such procedures would
be incorporated in this directive.
(1) To the extent possible, Bureaus are to avoid actions which
would result in modification or destruction of floodplain and wetlands
and, wherever there is a practicable alternative, are to avoid direct
or indirect support of new development or construction in a floodplain
or wetlands.
(2) In the case of any proposed Department of the Treasury action
which may involve floodplain or wetlands, and which may require the
preparation of and EA or EIS, the assessment or statement shall include
necessary data on the floodplain or wetlands in keeping with these
procedures.
(3) In the event of floodplain or wetlands involvement, the
following procedural steps are to be followed. (Although these steps
specifically mention floodplain, they are also applicable to wetlands.)
(a) Determine if the proposed action is in a floodplain.
(b) Provide for public involvement in a floodplain management
decision making process by informing the public of the intent to locate
in the floodplain, and by encouraging public comments thereon.
(c) Identify and evaluate practicable alternatives to locating in a
floodplain, including alternative sites, alternative actions, or no
action.
(d) If determined that the only practicable alternative is to
locate in a floodplain, identify the impacts of the proposed action
using the NEPA process and EA or EIS procedures in this directive.
Focus especially on the adverse impacts of the proposed action on lives
and property in the area, and on natural and beneficial floodplain
values.
(e) If harm to, or within, a floodplain may result from the
proposed action, determine ways to minimize the harm and to restore and
preserve the floodplain values. Measures should be considered to
include the use of offsite floodplain/wetland mitigation ``banks''.
(f) Reevaluate the proposed alternatives, based on the information
obtained and consider whether the proposed action is still feasible at
the site or should be limited.
(g) A statement of findings and public explanation, including a
brief comment period, must be provided for the proposed action if
reevaluation determines that the proposed action is the only
practicable alternative.
13. PROPOSALS FOR LEGISLATION. A legislative environmental impact
statement is the detailed statement required by law to be included in a
recommendation or report on a legislative proposal (that originates
within Treasury) to Congress. A legislative EIS shall be considered
part of the formal transmittal of a legislative proposal to Congress,
although it may be sent to Congress up to 30 days later to allow time
for completion and accuracy. In all instances, the legislative
statement must be available in time for Congressional hearings and
deliberations in order that it may serve as a basis for public and
Congressional debate (Section 1506.8(a), CEQ regulations).
(a) Preparation of a legislative EIS shall conform to the
requirements for EISs except as follows:
(1) There need not be a ``scoping'' process.
(2) The legislative EIS, although prepared in the same manner as a
draft EIS, shall be considered that ``detailed statement'' required by
statute. Provided that, when any of the following conditions exist,
both a draft and final legislative EIS shall be prepared and circulated
as provided in Sections 1503.1 and 1506.10 of the CEQ regulations.
(a) A congressional committee with jurisdiction over the proposal
has a rule requiring both draft and final EISs.
(b) The proposal results from a study process required by statute.
(c) Legislative approval is sought for federal or federally
assisted construction or other projects which the office/bureau
recommends be located at specific geographic locations. For proposals
requiring an EIS for the acquisition of space by the GSA, draft and
final EISs shall be provided to GSA for use during the approval
process.
(d) The organization prepares draft and final statements with an
electronic copy to the EPM.
14. FILING AND DISTRIBUTION OF EISs AND SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENTS.
a. The bureaus will communicate timely and provide electronic
versions and written and bound copies, as needed, of their EIS and
related documents concerning filing and distribution of EISs and
Supplemental Statements with the ASM through the EPM. The EPM will
place the documents on the Department of the Treasury Public NEPA Web
site, and will be available for bureau consultation.
b. As of October 1, 2012 EPA no longer accepts paper copies or
compact discs (CDs) of EISs for filing purposes. EPA's online tool e-
NEPA (https://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/
[[Page 49842]]
submiteis/e-nepa-guide-on-registration-and-preparing-an-eis-for-
electronic-submission.pdf) meets their requirements for EIS filing. All
submissions must be made through e-NEPA. At the same time as they are
filed with EPA, EISs shall also be sent to commenting agencies and made
available to the public (Section 1506.9, CEQ regulations). Any
supplement to an EIS shall be made a part of the formal record, if such
a record exists, before a final decision on the proposal is made
(Section 1502.9(c)(3), CEQ regulations).
15. OTHER REQUIREMENTS.
a. Integrating Departmental Procedures with Other Environmental
Review and Consultation Requirements.
(1) Section 1501.7(a)(6) of the CEQ regulations requires that, as
part of the scoping process, agencies identify other environmental
review and consultation requirements so that any other required
analyses or studies may be prepared concurrently and integrated with
EAs and EISs.
(2) The attention of the bureaus is directed particularly to the
analyses and studies required by the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
(16 U.S.C. 661, et seq.); the National Historic Preservation Act of
1966, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 470, et seq.); the Endangered Species Act
of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.); E.O. 11988, ``Floodplain
Management,'' dated May 24, 1977; E.O. 11990, ``Protection of
Wetlands,'' dated May 24, 1977; CEQ Memorandum, ``Interagency
Consultation to Avoid or Mitigate Adverse Effects on Rivers in the
Nationwide Inventory,'' dated August 10, 1980; CEQ Memorandum,
``Analysis of Impacts on Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands in
Implementing the National Environmental Policy,'' dated August 11,
1980; and other similar requirements.
b. EPA Review.
(1) Section 309 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7609) provides that
the EPA Administrator shall comment in writing on the environmental
impact of any matter within the area of EPA responsibility. Those areas
include air and water quality, noise abatement and control, pesticide
regulation, solid waste disposal, and generally applicable
environmental radiation criteria and standards.
EPA has developed a set of criteria for rating draft EISs. The
rating system provides a basis upon which EPA makes recommendations to
the lead agency for improving the draft EIS. These are rated in two
categories; rating the Environmental Impact of the Action, and rating
the Adequacy of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Additional
information can be found here: https://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/comments/ratings.html
(2) If the EPA Administrator determines that the matter ``is
unsatisfactory from the standpoint of public health or welfare or
environmental quality,'' the matter is to be referred to the CEQ in
accordance with the criteria and procedures outlined in Sections 1504.2
and 1504.3 of the CEQ regulations.
(3) Under Section 102(2)(C) of NEPA, other federal agencies are
authorized to make similar reviews and referrals in accordance with the
criteria and procedures in Section 1504.2 and 1504.3 of the CEQ
regulations.
c. All hardcopy reports required shall be printed on paper
containing a minimum of 30 percent postconsumer fiber and also shall be
printed or copied double-sided, to the degree possible.
Appendix 1: Categorical Exclusions
Categorical Exclusions (CEs)
The CE is intended to reduce paperwork and eliminate unnecessary
EA and EIS preparation. Treasury actions which are considered to be
categorically excluded are listed in the table below. The list is
not exhaustive and any new CE shall be prepared in accordance with
the instructions provided in Treasury Directive Publication (TD P)
75-02. The term ``new'' includes substantive revisions to existing
CEs.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CE.... ADMINISTRATIVE AND REGULATORY ACTIVITIES. These
categorical exclusions have the additional requirement
to be conducted in conformance with Executive Orders
13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy,
and Transportation Management, and 13514, Federal
Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic
Performance.
A1............ Personnel actions, including recruiting, processing,
paying, recordkeeping, and resource management;
fiscal, general management, administrative activities,
budgeting, other personnel actions, and travel.
A2............ Reductions, realignments, or relocation of personnel
that do not result in exceeding the infrastructure
capacity or change the use of space. An example of a
substantial change in use of the supporting
infrastructure would be an increase in vehicular
traffic beyond the capacity of the supporting road
network to accommodate such an increase.
A3............ Promulgation of rules, issuance of rulings or
interpretations, and the development and publication
of policies, orders, directives, notices, procedures,
manuals, and other guidance documents of the following
nature:
(a) Those of a strictly administrative or procedural
nature;
(b) Those that adopt, without substantive change,
statutory or regulatory requirements;
(c) Those that implement, without substantive
change, procedures, manuals, and other guidance
documents;
(d) Those that interpret or amend an existing
regulation without changing its environmental
effect;
(e) Technical guidance on safety and security
matters; or
(f) Guidance for the preparation of security plans.
A4............. Information gathering, data analysis and processing,
information dissemination, review, interpretation, and
development of documents. If any of these activities
result in proposals for further action, those
proposals must be covered by an appropriate CE.
Examples include but are not limited to:
(a) Document mailings, publication and distribution,
training and information programs, historical and
cultural demonstrations, and public affairs
actions.
(b) Studies, reports, proposals, analyses,
literature reviews; computer modeling; and non-
intrusive information gathering activities.
A5............. Awarding of contracts for technical support services,
ongoing management and operation of government
facilities.
A6............. Procurement of non-hazardous goods and services, and
storage, recycling, and disposal of non-hazardous
materials and wastes, that complies with applicable
requirements and is in support of routine
administrative, operational, or maintenance
activities. Storage activities must occur on improved
land or in existing facilities. Examples of non-
hazardous goods and services include, but are not
limited to:
(a) Office supplies,
(b) Equipment,
(c) Mobile assets,
(d) Utility services,
(e) Chemicals and low level radio nuclides for
laboratory use,
(f) Deployable emergency response supplies and
equipment, and,
(g) Waste disposal and contracts for waste disposal
in established permitted landfills and facilities.
[[Page 49843]]
A7............. The commitment of resources, personnel, and funding to
conduct audits, surveys, and data collection provided
that the technology or procedure involved is well
understood and there are no adverse environmental
impacts anticipated from it. If any of these
commitments result in proposals for further action,
those proposals must be covered by an appropriate CE.
Examples include, but are not limited to:
(a) Activities designed to support improvement or
upgrade of management of natural resources, such as
surveys for threatened and endangered species,
wildlife and wildlife habitat, historic properties,
and archeological sites; wetland delineations;
minimal water, air, waste, material and soil
sampling; audits, photography, and interpretation;
(b) Minimally-intrusive geological, geophysical, and
geo-technical activities, including mapping and
engineering surveys.
(c) Conducting Facility Audits, Environmental Site
Assessments and Environmental Baseline Surveys,
and,
(d) Vulnerability, risk, and structural integrity
assessments of infrastructure.
CE... OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES
B1............. Research, development, testing, and evaluation
activities, or laboratory operations conducted within
existing enclosed facilities consistent with
previously established safety levels and in compliance
with applicable federal, tribal, state, and local
requirements to protect the environment when it will
result in no, or de minimis change in the use of the
facility. If the operation will increase the extent of
potential environmental impacts or is controversial,
an EA (and possibly an EIS) is required.
B2............. Transportation of personnel, equipment, and evidentiary
materials in wheeled vehicles over existing roads or
jeep trails established by federal, tribal, state, or
local governments.
B3............. Use and operation of an existing structure that would
be compatible with and similar in scope to its ongoing
functional uses and would be consistent with
previously established safety levels and in compliance
with applicable federal, tribal, state, or local
requirements to protect the environment.
B4............. Support for or participation in short-lived, beneficial
community projects that do not involve construction,
or significant physical alteration of the environment.
Examples include, but are not limited to:
(a) Earth Day activities,
(b) Cleanup of rivers and parkways, and
(c) Participation in ``team building'' activities.
B5............. Approval of recreational or public activities or events
at a location typically used for that type and scope
(size and intensity) of activity that would not
involve significant physical alteration of the
environment. Examples include, but are not limited to:
(a) Picnics, and
(b) Interpretive programs for historic and cultural
resources, such as programs in conjunction with
state and tribal Historic Preservation Officers, or
with local historic preservation or re-enactment
groups.
B6............. Initial assignment or realignment of vehicles to
existing operational facilities that have the capacity
to accommodate such vehicles or where supporting
infrastructure changes will be minor.
B7............. Acquisition, installation, maintenance, operation, or
evaluation of security equipment to protect people and
materials at existing facilities and the eventual
removal and disposal of that equipment in compliance
with applicable federal, tribal, state, and local
requirements to protect the environment. Examples of
the equipment include, but are not limited to:
(a) Low-level x-ray devices,
(b) Cameras and biometric devices,
(c) Passive inspection devices,
(d) Detection or security systems, and,
(e) Access controls, screening devices, and traffic
management systems.
(f) Alarms,
(g) Fences and temporary barriers,
(h) Preventative security systems.
B8............. Identification, inspections, surveys, or sampling,
testing, seizures, quarantines, removals,
sanitization, and monitoring of items that cause
little or no physical alteration of the environment.
B9............. Routine monitoring and surveillance activities that
support law enforcement such as patrols,
investigations, and intelligence gathering, but not
including any construction activities. This CE would
primarily encompass a variety of daily activities
performed by Treasury emergency management, operations
centers and security personnel.
CE... REAL ESTATE ACTIVITIES
C1............. Acquisition of an interest in real property and all
facilities on such property that is not within or
adjacent to environmentally protected areas, including
interests less than a fee simple, by purchase, lease,
assignment, easement, condemnation, or donation, which
does not result in a change in the functional use of
the property.
C2............. Lease extensions, renewals, or succeeding leases for
real property and all facilities on such property
where there is no change in the facility's use and all
environmental permits have been acquired and are
current.
C3............. Transfer of administrative control over real property,
including related personal property, between another
federal agency and Treasury that does not result in a
change in the functional use of the property.
C4............. Determination that real property is excess to the needs
of the Treasury and, in the case of acquired real
property, the subsequent reporting of such
determination to the General Services Administration.
CE... REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES
D1............. Minor renovations and additions to buildings, roads,
grounds, equipment, and other facilities that do not
result in a change in the functional use of the real
property (e.g. realigning interior spaces of an
existing building, adding a small storage shed to an
existing building, retrofitting for energy
conservation, or installing a small antenna on a
building roof).
D2............. Routine upgrade, repair, maintenance, or replacement of
equipment and vehicles, or other mobile assets (such
as emergency generators) which is substantially the
same as that routinely performed by private sector
owners.
D3............. Repair and maintenance of Treasury-managed buildings,
roads, grounds, and other facilities which do not
result in a change in functional use (e.g. replacing a
roof, painting a building, resurfacing a road, common
pest control activities, restoration of trails and
firebreaks, culvert maintenance, grounds maintenance,
existing security systems that do not require
individual regulatory permits).
D4............. Reconstruction and/or repair by replacement of existing
utilities in an existing right-of-way or easement.
CE.... CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, AND DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES
E1............. Installation, operation, maintenance, and removal of
utility and communication systems (such as mobile
antennas, data processing cable, and similar
electronic equipment) that use existing rights-of-way,
easements, utility distribution systems, and/or
associated facilities.
E2............. Addition to an existing structure or improvement of
land where all of the following conditions are met:
(a) The structure and proposed use are compatible
with applicable federal, tribal, state, and local
planning and zoning standards and consistent with
federally approved state coastal management
programs,
(b) The site is in a previously disturbed location,
[[Page 49844]]
(c) The proposed use will not substantially increase
the number of motor vehicles at the facility or in
the area,
(d) The site and scale of construction or
improvement are consistent with those of existing,
adjacent, or nearby buildings, and,
(e) The construction or improvement will not result
in uses that exceed existing support infrastructure
capacities (roads, sewer, water, parking, etc.).
(f) The original footprint of a Treasury facility is
not increased by more than 10 percent.
E3............. Acquisition, installation, operation, and maintenance
of equipment, devices, and/or controls necessary to
mitigate effects of Treasury's actions on health and
the environment. Examples include but are not limited
to:
(a) Installation of new emissions and pollution
control equipment whose new emissions are minor or
offset by emission credits or by the removal of
other equipment and it does not result in increased
air emissions. The installation is done in
compliance with all Federal, state, local and
tribal requirements. Examples include adding new
equipment for printing currency while using credits
to offset the emissions;
(b) Noise abatement measures, including construction
of noise barriers, installation of noise control
materials, or planting native trees and/or native
vegetation for use as a noise abatement measure,
and,
(c) Devices to protect human or animal life, such as
raptor electrocution prevention devices, fencing
and grating to prevent accidental entry to
hazardous or restricted areas, and rescue beacons
to protect human life.
E4............. Removal or demolition, along with subsequent disposal
of debris to permitted or authorized off-site
locations, of non-historic buildings, structures,
other improvements, and/or equipment in compliance
with applicable environmental and safety requirements.
E5............. Natural resource management activities to enhance
native flora and fauna, including site preparation,
and landscaping.
E6............. Reconstruction of roads on Treasury facilities, where
runoff, erosion, and sedimentation issues are
mitigated through implementation of best management
practices as described in EPA's National Menu of Best
Management Practices for Stormwater Phase II.
E7............. Construction of physical fitness and training trails
for non-motorized use on Treasury facilities in areas
that are not environmentally protected, where run-off,
erosion, and sedimentation are mitigated through
implementation of best management practices.
CE.... HAZARDOUS/RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT AND
OPERATIONS
F1............. Routine procurement, transportation, distribution, use
storage, and off-site disposal of hazardous materials
that comply with all applicable federal, state, local,
and tribal requirements.
F2............. Reuse, recycling, and disposal of solid, medical,
radiological, and hazardous waste generated incidental
to Treasury activities that comply with applicable
federal, state, local, and tribal requirements.
Examples include but are not limited to:
(a) Appropriate treatment and disposal of medical
waste conducted in accordance with all federal,
state, local and tribal laws and regulations,
(b) Temporary storage and disposal of solid waste,
conducted in accordance with all federal, state,
local and tribal laws and regulations,
(c) Disposal of radiological waste through
manufacturer return and recycling programs, and,
(d) Hazardous waste minimization activities.
F3............. Use (that may include the processes of installation,
maintenance, non-destructive testing, and
calibration), transport, and storage of hand-held,
mobile or stationary instruments, containing sealed
radiological and radioactive materials, to screen for
possible security violations in compliance with
commercial manufacturers' specifications, as well as
applicable federal requirements to protect the human
environment. Examples of such instruments include but
are not limited to:
(a) Gauging devices, tracers, and other analytical
instruments,
(b) Instruments used in industrial radiography,
(c) Systems used in medical and veterinary practices
and,
(d) Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approved,
sealed, small source radiation devices for scanning
vehicles and packages where radiation exposure to
employees or the public does not exceed 0.1 rem per
year and where systems are maintained within the
NRC license parameters at existing facilities.
CE.... TRAINING AND EXERCISES
G1............. Training of security personnel using existing
facilities where the training occurs in accordance
with applicable permits and other requirements for the
protection of the environment. This exclusion does not
apply to training that involves the use of live
chemical, biological, or radiological agents except
when conducted at a location designed and constructed
to contain the materials used for that training.
Examples include but are not limited to:
(a) Administrative or classroom training,
(b) Vehicle operation training,
(c) Security specialties,
(d) Crowd control training,
(e) Enforcement response, self-defense, and
interdiction techniques training, and,
(f) Techniques for use in fingerprinting and drug
analysis.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2014-19891 Filed 8-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P