Special Regulations, Areas of the National Park System, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve; Off-Road Vehicles, 49232-49239 [2014-19740]
Download as PDF
49232
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: July 29, 2014.
T.G. Allan, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Jacksonville.
[FR Doc. 2014–19795 Filed 8–19–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 13
[NPS–WRST–15781; PPAKWRSTPO,
PPMPSAS1Z.YP0000]
RIN 1024–AE14
Special Regulations, Areas of the
National Park System, Wrangell-St.
Elias National Park and Preserve; OffRoad Vehicles
National Park Service, Interior.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service is
amending its special regulations for
Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and
Preserve to designate trails in the
portion of the Nabesna District located
within the National Preserve where
motor vehicles may be used off roads for
recreational purposes. The rule
prohibits the use of certain types of
vehicles based upon size and weight,
and closes certain areas in designated
wilderness within the Nabesna District
that are located outside of established
trails and trail corridors to the use of
motor vehicles for subsistence.
DATES: This rule is effective September
19, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick
Obernesser, Superintendent, WrangellSt. Elias National Park and Preserve,
P.O. Box 439, Copper Center, Alaska
99573. Phone (907) 822–7202. Email:
AKR_Regulations@nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Background
The approximately 13.2-million-acre
Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and
Preserve (Wrangell-St. Elias) was
established in 1980 by the Alaska
National Interest Lands Conservation
Act (ANILCA) (Pub. L. 96–487, Dec. 2
1980; 16 U.S.C. 410hh–410hh5; 3101–
3233). Wrangell-St. Elias consists of
approximately 8.3 million acres of land
designated as a National Park and
approximately 4.8 million acres of land
designated as a National Preserve.
Section 201(9) of ANILCA (16 U.S.C.
410hh(9)) directed that Wrangell-St.
Elias be managed for the following
purposes:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:55 Aug 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
• To maintain unimpaired the scenic
beauty and quality of high mountain
peaks, foothills, glacial systems, lakes
and streams, valleys, and coastal
landscapes in their natural state.
• To protect habitat for, and
populations of, fish and wildlife
including but not limited to caribou,
brown/grizzly bears, Dall’s sheep,
moose, wolves, trumpeter swans and
other waterfowl, and marine mammals.
• To provide continued
opportunities, including reasonable
access for mountain climbing,
mountaineering, and other wilderness
recreational activities.
That provision of ANILCA also directed
that subsistence uses by local residents
be permitted in the park, where such
uses are traditional, in accordance with
the provisions of Title VIII of ANILCA.
Section 203 of ANILCA (16 U.S.C.
410hh–2) directed the Secretary of the
Interior, acting through the National
Park Service (NPS), to administer
Wrangell-St. Elias as a new area of the
National Park System, pursuant to the
provisions of the National Park Service
Organic Act of 1916 (Organic Act) (16
U.S.C. 1 et seq.). In the Organic Act,
Congress granted the NPS broad
authority to regulate the use of areas
under its jurisdiction provided that the
associated impacts will leave the
‘‘scenery and the natural and historic
objects and the wild life [in these areas]
unimpaired for the enjoyment of future
generations.’’ Section 3 of the Organic
Act authorizes the Secretary of the
Interior, acting through NPS, to ‘‘make
and publish such rules and regulations
as he may deem necessary or proper for
the use and management of the parks.’’
Wilderness
Section 701 of ANILCA designated
approximately 9.6 million acres within
Wrangell-St. Elias as wilderness, a
portion of which is located within the
Nabesna District. Section 707 of
ANILCA provides that, ‘‘[e]xcept as
otherwise expressly provided for in this
Act . . . ,’’ wilderness designated by
ANILCA shall be administered in
accordance with the Wilderness Act.
According to the Wilderness Act (16
U.S.C. 1131–1136), these lands are to be
‘‘administered for the use and
enjoyment of the American people in
such manner as will leave them
unimpaired for future use and
enjoyment as wilderness, and so as to
provide for the protection of these areas,
[and] the preservation of their
wilderness character . . . .’’
Access for Subsistence Uses
ANILCA authorizes certain methods
of access for subsistence purposes that
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
would otherwise be prohibited under
Federal law or general NPS regulations.
Section 811(a) of ANILCA (16 U.S.C.
3121(a)) provides that ‘‘rural residents
engaged in subsistence uses shall have
reasonable access to subsistence
resources on the public lands.’’ Section
811(b) of ANILCA (16 U.S.C. 3121(b))
provides that ‘‘[n]otwithstanding any
other provision of this Act or other law,
the Secretary shall permit on the public
lands appropriate use for subsistence
purposes of snowmobiles, motorboats,
and other means of surface
transportation traditionally employed
for such purpose by local residents,
subject to reasonable regulation.’’
NPS implemented Section 811 of
ANILCA (16 U.S.C. 3121) in 36 CFR
13.460(a), which states
‘‘[n]otwithstanding any other provision
of this chapter, the use of . . . other
means of surface transportation
traditionally employed by local rural
residents engaged in subsistence uses is
permitted within park areas except at
those times and in those areas restricted
or closed by the Superintendent.’’ The
1986 General Management Plan for
Wrangell-St. Elias determined off-road
vehicles (ORVs) were a means of surface
transportation traditionally employed
by local rural residents for subsistence
purposes. Title 36, Code of Federal
Regulations, section 13.460(b)–(c)
authorizes the Superintendent to restrict
or close routes or areas to a certain use
after notice and a public hearing ‘‘if the
Superintendent determines that such
use is causing or is likely to cause an
adverse impact on public health and
safety, resource protection, protection of
historic or scientific values, subsistence
uses, conservation of endangered or
threatened species, or the purposes for
which the park was established.’’
Off-Road Vehicles
The subsistence use of motor vehicles
off roads in Wrangell-St. Elias is
governed by Section 811(b) of ANILCA
(16 U.S.C. 3121(b)) and 36 CFR 13.460.
Separate legal authorities govern other
uses of motor vehicles off roads in
Wrangell-St. Elias. Under 43 CFR
36.11(g)(1), non-subsistence use of offroad vehicles is generally prohibited,
except on routes designated by NPS in
accordance with Executive Order 11644,
or pursuant to a valid permit issued
under 43 CFR 36.11(g)(2), 43 CFR 36.10,
or 43 CFR 36.12.
Executive Order 11644, ‘‘Use of OffRoad Vehicles on the Public Lands,’’
issued in 1972 and amended in 1977 by
Executive Order 11989, required federal
agencies to issue regulations designating
specific areas and routes on public
lands where the use of ORVs may be
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
permitted. NPS implemented these
Executive Orders in 36 CFR 4.10, which
prohibits the use of motor vehicles off
established roads unless routes and
areas are designated for off-road motor
vehicle use by special regulation. Under
36 CFR 4.10(b), such routes and areas
‘‘may be designated only in national
recreation areas, national seashores,
national lakeshores and national
preserves.’’ Under 36 CFR 4.10(b), the
designation of ORV routes must comply
with Executive Order 11644, as
amended, which requires that they be
located:
• To minimize damage to soil,
watershed, vegetation, or other
resources of the public lands.
• To minimize harassment of wildlife
or significant disruption of wildlife
habitat.
• To minimize conflicts between ORV
use and other existing or proposed
recreational uses of the same or
neighboring public lands, and to ensure
the compatibility of such uses with
existing conditions in populated areas,
taking into account noise and other
factors.
• In areas of the National Park System
only if the respective agency head
determines that ORV use in such
locations will not adversely affect their
natural, aesthetic, or scenic values.
Executive Order 11644 also requires that
NPS ensure adequate opportunity for
public participation when designating
areas and trails for ORV use.
History of ORV Use in the Nabesna
District of Wrangell-St. Elias
ORV use in the Nabesna District
commenced after World War II when
surplus military vehicles were used by
hunters, miners, and others for personal
use and access to remote areas. In the
late 1970s, the all-terrain vehicle
(typically three- or four-wheelers)
emerged as a new and more affordable
mode of cross-country travel in rural
Alaska. When Wrangell-St. Elias was
created in 1980, there was an
established trail network in the Nabesna
District. These trails were used by
recreational and subsistence users, as
well as a means to access private
inholdings. The 1986 General
Management Plan for Wrangell-St. Elias
determined that ORVs are a traditional
means of accessing subsistence
resources by local residents.
In 1983, Wrangell-St. Elias began
issuing permits for recreational ORV use
on nine established trails under 43 CFR
36.11(g)(2). This regulation provides
superintendents authority to issue
permits allowing ORV use on existing
trails in areas that are not designated
wilderness upon a finding that the ORV
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:55 Aug 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
use ‘‘would be compatible with the
purposes and values for which the area
was established.’’ The permits require
users to stay on existing trails and
adhere to certain conditions. The
number of permits issued for
recreational ORV use rose from 64 in
1985 to 263 in 2010.
Since 1986, Wrangell-St. Elias has
conducted two major studies of ORV
impacts, and a detailed survey and
inventory of physical conditions along
the existing trails in the Nabesna
District. These studies demonstrated
that ORV use over wet areas leads to
trail braiding and widening. Vegetation
does not recover quickly, soils erode,
permafrost depth changes, and impacts
to surface hydrology occur. Of the nine
trails in the Nabesna District, the
Tanada Lake, Copper Lake, Reeves
Field, and Suslota trails have substantial
sections with degraded conditions.
On June 29, 2006, the National Parks
Conservation Association, Alaska Center
for the Environment, and the
Wilderness Society filed a lawsuit
against NPS in the United States District
Court for the District of Alaska. The
plaintiffs challenged the method used
by NPS to issue recreational ORV
permits for the nine trails within the
Nabesna District. They asserted that
when issuing recreational ORV permits,
NPS failed to make the compatibility
finding required by 43 CFR 36.11(g)(2)
and failed to prepare an environmental
analysis of recreational ORV use as
required by the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). The
plaintiffs did not challenge the use of
ORVs for subsistence uses.
In a settlement agreement announced
on May 15, 2007, NPS agreed to
suspend issuing recreational ORV
permits for three specific trails unless
the ground is frozen. NPS also agreed to
prepare an environmental impact
statement under NEPA and issue a
record of decision.
Environmental Impact Statement and
Selected Action
On December 21, 2007, NPS
published a Notice of Intent to prepare
an environmental impact statement in
the Federal Register. The initial
planning process included extensive
public involvement, public meetings,
agency consultation, and tribal
consultation. The Nabesna Off-Road
Vehicle Management Plan/Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
was released to the public on August 11,
2010. During the 90-day public
comment period, which included public
meetings and briefings, NPS received
153 comment letters. NPS responses to
public comments were included in the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
49233
Final Environmental Impact Statement
Nabesna Off-Road Vehicle Management
Plan (FEIS) published in August 2011.
The FEIS describes major impacts to
soils, wetlands, and vegetation
associated with ORV use on
unimproved trails. It also describes
moderate to major impacts to wilderness
character associated with subsistence
ORV use in designated wilderness.
On December 14, 2011, the Regional
Director signed a Record of Decision
(ROD) which identified Alternative 6 in
the FEIS as the selected action. The
selected action provides continued
opportunities for appropriate and
reasonable access to backcountry
recreation. The selected action also
accommodates subsistence use and
access to inholdings, and protects scenic
views, fish and wildlife habitat, and
other resources and values of WrangellSt. Elias.
Under the selected action, NPS will
improve the most degraded segments of
ORV trails in the Nabesna District
through trail re-routing or
reconstruction to a design-sustainable or
maintainable condition (as those terms
are defined in the FEIS). A designsustainable or maintainable condition
ensures that ORV users can stay on one
trail alignment and that damage to soils,
watersheds, vegetation, and other
resources are minimized. The FEIS
estimates that for the six trails in the
National Preserve, trail improvements
will result in the recovery of 204.6 acres
of wetland habitat and 212.7 acres of
vegetation habitat. The FEIS also
projects that each of the improved trails
in the National Preserve will have
between 50 and 180 ORV round trips
per year (depending upon the trail and
including both recreational and
subsistence use), most of these
occurring during hunting season.
In accordance with 36 CFR 4.10(b),
the rule authorizes recreational ORV use
on improved or frozen trails in the
portion of the Nabesna District located
within the National Preserve, but not in
the National Park. In the area of
designated wilderness included in the
FEIS (FEIS Wilderness Area),
subsistence ORV users generally must
stay on designated trails; however, offtrail ORV use is authorized in
designated trail corridors (i.e., 0.5 miles
on either side of the trail) for the sole
purpose of game retrieval. All other
areas of the FEIS Wilderness Area are
closed to subsistence ORV use. The
FEIS Wilderness Area is approximately
541,000 acres of designated wilderness,
bordered by Drop Creek on the west, the
Nabesna Glacier on the east, and Mt.
Sanford and Mt. Jarvis on the south.
Trails and trail corridors in the FEIS
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
49234
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Wilderness Area, and the boundaries of
the FEIS Wilderness Area, are identified
on the Upper Copper/Jacksina
Wilderness map available at the Slana
Ranger Station, the Main Park Visitor
Center, the Tanada and Copper Lake
trailheads, and on the park’s Web site at
https://www.nps.gov/wrst. In the portion
of the Nabesna District located outside
of the FEIS Wilderness Area,
subsistence ORV use is allowed on or
off ORV trails before and after trail
improvements. NPS will monitor the
use and take management actions as
described in the FEIS. The rule
precludes the use of certain types of
vehicles based upon vehicle size and
weight.
The DEIS, FEIS, ROD, and other
supporting documents can be found
online at https://
www.parkplanning.nps.gov/wrst, by
clicking on the link entitled ‘‘Nabesna
ORV Management Plan EIS’’ and then
clicking on the link entitled ‘‘Document
List.’’
Final Rule
Summary of Final Rule
The rule amends the special
regulations for Wrangell-St. Elias at 36
CFR part 13, subpart V, to implement
the selected action in the ROD. Pursuant
to 36 CFR 4.10(b), the rule designates
six trails in the National Preserve for
recreational ORV use. Recreational ORV
users are required to obtain a permit to
use the designated trails. Permits will be
issued only for frozen trails or trails in
a design-sustainable or maintainable
condition, as determined by the
Superintendent. The rule requires that
subsistence ORV users stay on trails or
within trail corridors in the FEIS
Wilderness Area. The rule also
establishes vehicle weight and size
limits to protect park resources.
Through implementation of the selected
action in the ROD, Wrangell-St. Elias
will continue to protect and preserve
natural and cultural resources and
natural processes, and provide a variety
of safe visitor experiences while
minimizing conflicts among users.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Recreational ORV Use
The following trails in the National
Preserve are designated for recreational
ORV use: Suslota, Caribou Creek, Trail
Creek, Lost Creek, Soda Lake, and Reeve
Field. Recreational ORV users are
required to obtain a permit to use the
designated trails. Prior to trail
improvements, permits will be issued
only for trails in fair or better condition
(Lost Creek, Soda Lake, and Trail
Creek), except that permits may be
issued for any of the six designated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:55 Aug 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
trails in the National Preserve when the
Superintendent determines they are
frozen. Frozen is defined as frost depth
of 6 inches as measured with a soil
probe. NPS will announce the
completion of trail improvements and
when trails are frozen through a press
release and notices posted at the Slana
Ranger Station, the Main Park Visitor
Center, and on the park’s Web site at
https://www.nps.gov/wrst/planyourvisit/
orv-trails.htm. After trail improvements,
permits will be issued for the additional
trails in the National Preserve (Suslota,
Caribou Creek, and Reeve Field)
regardless of whether the trails are
frozen. Recreational ORV use permits
will include the following conditions to
protect park resources:
• Travel is only authorized on
designated trails listed on the permit.
• ORVs must stay on the designated
trails.
• If hunting, gathering, or otherwise
walking off the trail, park ORVs off to
the side of the trail; vehicles may not be
used to retrieve game off of the
designated trail alignment.
• Creating new trails is prohibited.
• ORV use is prohibited in designated
wilderness areas.
The rule prohibits recreational ORV use
in the portion of the Nabesna District
located within the National Park. Maps
of the trails designated for recreational
ORV use will be available at the Slana
Ranger Station and the Main Park
Visitor Center, and on the park’s Web
site at https://www.nps.gov/wrst.
Subsistence ORV Use
For trails in the FEIS Wilderness Area
(Black Mountain Trails and the southern
portions of the Tanada Lake Trail), the
rule requires that subsistence ORV users
stay on trails or, when for the purpose
of game retrieval only, within identified
trail corridors. The trail corridors
consist of 0.5 miles on either side of the
trail. Travel outside of these designated
trail corridors in the FEIS Wilderness
Area is prohibited. Trails and trail
corridors in the FEIS Wilderness Area,
and the boundaries of the FEIS
Wilderness Area, are identified on the
Upper Copper/Jacksina Wilderness map
available at the Slana Ranger Station
and the Main Park Visitor Center, and
on the park’s planning Web site at
https://www.nps.gov/wrst. They are also
identified at the Tanada and Copper
Lake trailheads.
Authorized Off-Road Vehicles
The rule also establishes the types of
ORVs that may be operated for
recreational as well as subsistence uses.
The following types of vehicles, because
of their size, width, weight, or high
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
surface pressure (measured, for
example, in pounds per square inch) are
prohibited for recreational or
subsistence uses:
• Nodwells or other tracked rigs
greater than 5.5 feet in width or 4,000
pounds curb weight.
• Street-legal highway vehicles.
• Custom 4x4 jeeps, SUVs, or trucks
designed for off-road use.
• Original or modified ‘‘deuce and a
half’’ cargo trucks.
• Dozers, skid-steer loaders,
excavators, or other construction
equipment.
• Motorcycles or dirt bikes.
• Log skidders.
The rule requires that all wheeled
vehicles (including all-terrain vehicles,
utility vehicles, and Argos) be less than
1,500 pounds curb weight, not
including trailers. Nothing in this rule
supersedes the applicable provisions of
36 CFR part 4 and 36 CFR 13.460(d),
which require that ORVs be operated in
compliance with applicable state and
federal laws, and prohibit damaging
park resources or harassing wildlife.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section explains some of the
principal elements of the rule in a
question and answer format.
What is an ‘‘Off-Road Vehicle’’ (ORV)?
Any motor vehicle, including allterrain vehicles, designed for or capable
of cross-country travel on or
immediately over land, water, sand,
snow, ice, marsh, wetland, or other
natural terrain, except snowmachines or
snowmobiles. This definition does not
include snowmachines and the rule
does not affect the use of snowmachines
in Wrangell-St. Elias.
What is recreational ORV use?
Any ORV use by individuals not
engaged in subsistence uses as defined
in 36 CFR 13.420 or accessing an
inholding. Recreational ORV use in the
portion of the Nabesna District located
within the National Preserve includes,
but is not limited to, access for sport
hunting, fishing, and dispersed
camping.
Do I need a permit to operate an ORV
for recreational purposes?
Yes, if you are using the ORV for
recreational use as defined above.
Permits for recreational ORV use may be
obtained at the Main Park Visitor Center
in Copper Center or the Slana Ranger
Station in Slana.
Do I need a permit to operate an ORV
for subsistence purposes?
No, not if you are a local rural
resident as defined by 36 CFR 13.420
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
and are actively engaged in subsistence
uses.
Are there any vehicle requirements for
my ORV?
Is there a limit to the number of ORV
permits available?
Yes, all ORVs are required to comply
with the weight and size limits specified
in the rule. The rule also prohibits the
use of certain types of vehicles.
No, there is no limit to the number of
permits that the Superintendent may
issue for recreational ORV use.
Several of my family members have
ORVs that we would like to use for
recreational purposes on trails in the
National Preserve. Do we need a permit
for each vehicle?
Yes, you need to obtain a permit for
each vehicle that you want to use for
recreational purposes on designated
ORV trails. The operator of the ORV
must have the permit in his or her
possession when the ORV is in use.
How long will permits be valid for ORV
use?
When you apply for a permit, you
must indicate how long you intend to
operate an ORV for recreational use. The
NPS will determine the duration of the
permit based upon the requested time
period and other factors such as public
health and safety, resource protection,
protection of cultural or scientific
values, subsistence uses, endangered or
threatened species conservation, or
other management considerations
necessary to ensure that ORV use is
being managed in a manner compatible
with the purposes for which the park
was established. The duration of each
permit will be stated in the terms and
conditions of the permit.
Where can I operate my ORV?
For recreational ORV users,
designated trails will be listed on the
face of the permit and identified on
maps available at the Slana Ranger
Station and the Main Park Visitor
Center, and on the park’s Web site at
https://www.nps.gov/wrst. Travel is only
permitted on the trails listed on the
permit, which will include all of the
trails designated for ORV use by this
rule that are either frozen or improved.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Will designated trails for recreational
ORV users be marked on the ground?
Yes, trails designated for recreational
ORV use will be shown on a map on a
kiosk at the trailhead and will be
marked on the ground with carsonite
posts.
Can I tow a trailer with my ORV on
designated trails?
Yes, NPS recommends the use of lowpressure ‘‘balloon’’ style tires on ORV
trailers.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:55 Aug 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
I am a local rural resident engaged in
subsistence uses. What effect does the
rule have on me?
Your ORV must comply with the
weight and size limits described in the
rule, and certain types of vehicles listed
in the rule are prohibited. On the trails
in the FEIS Wilderness Area (Black
Mountain Trails and the southern
portions of the Tanada Lake Trail),
subsistence ORV users generally must
stay on trails; however, off-trail ORV use
in the FEIS Wilderness area is
authorized in designated trail corridors
(i.e., 0.5 miles on either side of the trail)
for the sole purpose of game retrieval.
All other areas of the FEIS Wilderness
Area are closed to subsistence ORV use.
How will designated trails and trail
corridors for subsistence ORV users in
the FEIS Wilderness Area be identified?
The designated trails and trail
corridors are identified on the Upper
Copper/Jacksina Wilderness map
available at the Slana Ranger Station
and the Main Park Visitor Center, and
on the park’s Web site at https://
www.nps.gov/wrst. They are also
identified at the Tanada and Copper
Lake trailheads.
Summary of and Responses to Public
Comments
The NPS published the proposed rule
at 79 FR 2608 (January 15, 2014). The
NPS accepted comments through the
mail, hand delivery, and through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments were
accepted through March 17, 2014, and
the NPS received nine comments. A
summary of comments and NPS
responses is provided below. Several
comments supported the proposed rule
and did not request any change. After
considering the public comments and
after additional review, the NPS did not
make any substantive changes in the
final rule. The definition of ‘‘ORV’’ in
the proposed rule was removed because
‘‘off-road vehicle’’ is already defined in
36 CFR 13.1. Other minor changes were
made for clarity.
1. Comment: One comment stated that
the NPS should not allow any
recreational ORV use in the National
Preserve because it would detrimentally
affect the National Park and cause
severe degradation of the National
Preserve and its biodiversity.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
49235
NPS Response: Section 1313 of
ANILCA (16 U.S.C. 3201) allows for
sport hunting and fishing in national
preserves in Alaska. As noted in the
FEIS, there is a network of trails in the
Nabesna District that predates the
establishment of Wrangell-St. Elias.
These trails were used by ORVs to
access areas for sport and subsistence
hunting, mining, and access to private
property. Part of the purpose of the
Nabesna Off-Road Vehicle Management
Plan, as stated in the FEIS, is to provide
‘‘access to sport hunting in the National
Preserve’’ that is compatible with park
purposes and values. The FEIS
concluded that permitting recreational
ORV use on improved trails in the
National Preserve was a reasonable and
appropriate means of access. The FEIS
also concluded that permitting
recreational ORV use on frozen or
improved trails in the portion of the
Nabesna District located within the
National Preserve would not result in
significant impacts on the environment
or severe degradation of natural
resources, including wildlife, in either
the National Park or the National
Preserve.
2. Comment: One comment stated that
the NPS should not allow any
recreational ORV use in the National
Preserve because it would not result in
any economic benefit or increased
tourism.
NPS Response: The NPS completed a
cost-benefit analysis of the selected
action in a report entitled ‘‘Cost-Benefit
and Regulatory Flexibility Analyses:
Proposed Regulations for Management
of Off Road Vehicles in The Nabesna
District of Wrangell-St. Elias National
Park and Preserve’’ which can be
viewed online at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/wrst, by clicking
the link entitled ‘‘Nabesna ORV
Management Plan EIS’’ and then
clicking the link entitled ‘‘Document
List.’’ This report concluded that the
selected action will have beneficial
effects on trail condition, visitor
opportunities, and socioeconomics. It
also concluded that the selected action
will improve economic efficiency.
3. Comment: The Alaska Quiet Rights
Coalition stated that the NPS should not
allow any recreational ORV use in the
National Preserve because it would
eliminate a quiet alternative to less
protected public lands.
NPS Response: The FEIS concluded
that permitting recreational ORV use on
improved trails in the National Preserve
would have ‘‘minor, long-term, adverse
direct and indirect impacts to
soundscapes’’ because of the low
anticipated level of ORV use and
because of the small affected area
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
49236
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
relative to other areas available for nonmotorized activities. Because of the
minor impacts and relatively small area,
the NPS determined that recreational
ORV use on certain trails in the National
Preserve is an appropriate way for
individuals to experience and enjoy
Wrangell-St. Elias National Preserve.
4. Comment: Some commenters stated
that it will be difficult for the NPS to
regulate and enforce the rules related to
ORV use.
NPS Response: The NPS believes that
it will be able to enforce the rules
related to ORV use for the following
reasons:
• Recreational ORV users are required
to obtain a permit. Most users will get
their permit at the Slana Ranger Station
where they will receive information
about local trail conditions and
restrictions. Recreational ORV users are
required to have their permit with them
when the ORV is in use.
• Trailheads are well-signed with
kiosks that will indicate whether or not
the trail is open to recreational ORV use.
Trails will be marked on the ground
with carsonite posts. Maps showing
trails and trail corridors for subsistence
ORV users in designated wilderness will
be posted at the Copper Lake and
Tanada Lake trailheads.
• There is a full-time ranger stationed
in Slana. Patrol of the trails is a priority
during hunting season.
• This rule applies only to the
Nabesna District, not the entire 13.2
million acres of Wrangell St. Elias.
5. Comment: One commenter stated
that ORVs should not be allowed
outside of trails and trail corridors when
frozen because this could damage soil
and vegetation.
NPS Response: Recreational ORV
users are required to stay on trails.
Within the FEIS Wilderness area,
subsistence ORV users are limited to
trails and, for the purpose of game
retrieval only, off-trail in trail corridors.
Outside the FEIS Wilderness Area,
subsistence ORV users are not limited to
trails or trail corridors; however, the
NPS expects that ORV use under frozen
conditions will be light to non-existent
because ORV use is driven by hunting
seasons which typically end on or
before September 20th.
6. Comment: The State of Alaska
ANILCA Implementation Program and
Citizen’s Advisory Committee on
Federal Areas (CACFA) suggested 43
CFR 36.11(g) as a mechanism to
authorize recreational ORV use on
improved trails in the National Park
since these trails are ‘‘existing.’’
NPS Response: Because the proposed
re-routes of the most degraded segments
of ORV trails would take substantial
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:55 Aug 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
resources to build, deviate significantly
from the current alignment, and result
in a different set of environmental
impacts, the NPS does not believe these
re-routed trails are ‘‘existing’’ within the
meaning of 43 CFR 36.11(g).
7. Comment: The State of Alaska
ANILCA Implementation Program and
CACFA stated that recreational ORV use
should be allowed on improved or
frozen trails in the National Park to
provide affordable access to hunting and
fishing opportunities.
NPS Response: The NPS does not
believe it is appropriate to allow
recreational ORV use in the National
Park for the following reasons:
• The primary use of recreational
ORVs is to access areas for sport
hunting. Section 1313 of ANILCA (16
U.S.C. 3201) allows for sport hunting in
national preserves in Alaska, but this
activity is not permitted in the National
Park.
• This decision meets the objectives
for the project as stated in the FEIS and
represents a balanced approach based
upon public comments received on the
DEIS. This is further described in the
section entitled ‘‘Basis for the Decision’’
in the ROD that can be found online at
https://www.parkplanning.nps.gov/wrst,
by clicking on the link entitled
‘‘Nabesna ORV Management Plan EIS’’
and then clicking on the link entitled
‘‘Document List.’’
• Air taxis provide an alternative
means of accessing remote sport hunting
in the National Preserve.
• Improved trails in the National Park
(e.g., Tanada Lake Trail) will provide
enhanced non-motorized access for
recreational activities.
8. Comment: CACFA stated that
recreational ORV use should be allowed
on improved or frozen trails in the
National Park because ANILCA
guarantees that these types of traditional
uses would be allowed to continue.
NPS Response: ANILCA does not
address recreational ORV use in NPS
areas. Section 811 (16 U.S.C. 3121)
speaks to subsistence access for local
rural residents. While section 1110(a)
(16 U.S.C. 3170(a)) speaks to the use of
non-motorized surface transportation (as
well as snowmachines, motorboats, and
airplanes) for traditional activities and
for travel to and from villages and
homesites, it does not address ORVs.
9. Comment: The State of Alaska
ANILCA Implementation Program stated
that recreational ORV use should be
allowed on improved or frozen trails in
the National Park because the same
monitoring protocols and management
tools being applied to subsistence ORV
use in the National Park and National
Preserve and non-subsistence ORV use
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
in the National Preserve would also
detect and mitigate impacts from
recreational ORV use in the National
Park.
NPS Response: It is true that the
monitoring identified in the ROD will
help the NPS mitigate direct impacts to
soils, vegetation, and wetlands from all
ORV use. However, the NPS is not
monitoring impacts to visitor
opportunities, hunting competition
(subsistence), or soundscape that would
occur if recreational ORV use were
permitted in the National Park.
10. Comment: One commenter stated
that all wilderness areas should be open
to subsistence ORV use and that
subsistence ORV use should not be
confined to trails and trail corridors.
NPS Response: The FEIS concludes
that the closures in the FEIS Wilderness
Area are needed to prevent major
impacts to the undeveloped character of
the designated wilderness. The closures
are consistent with the 1986 WRST
GMP and Section 811(b) of ANILCA (16
U.S.C. 3121(b)), which states that the
Secretary shall permit subsistence use of
ORVs traditionally employed by local
residents, subject to reasonable
regulation.
Compliance With Other Laws,
Executive Orders, and Department
Policy
Use of Off-Road Vehicles on the Public
Lands (Executive Orders 11644 and
11989)
Executive Order 11644, as amended
by Executive Order 11989, was adopted
to address impacts on public lands from
ORV use. The Executive Order applies
to ORV use on federal public lands that
is not authorized under a valid lease,
permit, contract, or license. Section
3(a)(4) of Executive Order 11644
provides that ORV ‘‘[a]reas and trails
shall be located in areas of the National
Park System, Natural Areas, or National
Wildlife Refuges and Game Ranges only
if the respective agency head determines
that off-road vehicle use in such
locations will not adversely affect their
natural, aesthetic, or scenic values.’’
Since the Executive Order clearly was
not intended to prohibit all ORV use
everywhere in these units, the term
‘‘adversely affect’’ does not have the
same meaning as the somewhat similar
terms ‘‘adverse impact’’ and ‘‘adverse
effect’’ used in the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA). In analyses under NEPA, a
procedural statute that provides for the
study of environmental impacts, the
term ‘‘adverse effect’’ includes minor or
negligible effects.
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Section 3(a)(4) of the Executive Order,
by contrast, concerns substantive
management decisions and must be read
in the context of the authorities
applicable to such decisions. WrangellSt. Elias is an area of the National Park
System. Therefore, NPS interprets the
Executive Order term ‘‘adversely affect’’
consistent with its NPS Management
Policies 2006. Those policies require
that the NPS only allow ‘‘appropriate
use’’ of parks and avoid ‘‘unacceptable
impacts.’’
This rule is consistent with those
requirements. It will not impede
attainment of Wrangell-St. Elias’s
desired future conditions for natural
and cultural resources as identified in
the FEIS. NPS has determined that this
rule will not unreasonably interfere
with the atmosphere of peace and
tranquility or the natural soundscape
maintained in natural locations within
Wrangell-St. Elias. Therefore, within the
context of the resources and values of
Wrangell-St. Elias, motor vehicle use on
the routes and areas designated by this
rule (which are also subject to resource
closures and other management
measures that will be implemented
under the selected action in the ROD)
will not cause an unacceptable impact
to the natural, aesthetic, or scenic values
of Wrangell-St. Elias.
Section 8(a) of the Executive Order
requires agency heads to monitor the
effects of ORV use on lands under their
jurisdictions. On the basis of
information gathered, agency heads may
from time to time amend or rescind
designations of areas or other actions as
necessary to further the policy of the
Executive Order. The selected action in
the ROD includes monitoring and
resource protection procedures and
periodic review to provide for the
ongoing evaluation of impacts of motor
vehicle use on protected resources. The
Superintendent has authority to take
appropriate action as needed to protect
park resources.
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of
Management and Budget will review all
significant rules. OIRA has determined
that this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of Executive Order 12866
while calling for improvements in the
nation’s regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:55 Aug 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process
must allow for public participation and
an open exchange of ideas. We have
developed this rule in a manner
consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This rule will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities under the RFA (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This certification is
based on the cost-benefit and regulatory
flexibility analyses found in the report
entitled ‘‘Cost-Benefit and Regulatory
Flexibility Analyses: Proposed
Regulations for Management of Off Road
Vehicles in The Nabesna District of
Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and
Preserve’’ which can be viewed online
at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/wrst, by
clicking the link entitled ‘‘Nabesna ORV
Management Plan EIS’’ and then
clicking the link entitled ‘‘Document
List.’’
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the SBREFA. This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, federal, state, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S. based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local or tribal
governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information
required by the UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630. A takings implication
assessment is not required.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
49237
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, this rule does
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a Federalism summary impact
statement. The rule is limited in effect
to federal lands managed by the NPS
and does not have a substantial direct
effect on state and local government in
Alaska. A Federalism summary impact
statement is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes
(Executive Order 13175 and
Department Policy) and ANCSA
Corporations
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian
Tribes through a commitment to
consultation with Indian Tribes and
recognition of their right to selfgovernance and tribal sovereignty. We
have evaluated this rule under the
Department’s consultation and Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA)
Native Corporation policies. While the
NPS has determined the rule would not
have a substantial direct effect on
federally recognized Indian tribes or
ANCSA Native Corporation lands, water
areas, or resources, the NPS has
consulted Alaska Native tribes and
Alaska Native Corporations regarding
implementation of this rule.
Consultation occurred through biannual government to government
meetings with Cheesh‘na tribal council
and Mentasta traditional village council.
In addition, a letter was sent to each
tribal entity within the park’s resident
zone communities and to Ahtna Native
Corporation, Inc. when the proposed
rule was published in the Federal
Register.
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.)
This rule does not contain any new
collections of information that require
approval by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act. OMB has approved the
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
49238
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
information collection requirements
associated with NPS Special Park Use
Permits and has assigned OMB Control
Number 1024–0026 (expires 08/31/16).
An agency may not conduct or sponsor
and a person is not required to respond
to a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA)
This rule constitutes a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality
of the human environment. We have
prepared the FEIS under the NEPA. The
FEIS is summarized above and available
online at https://
www.parkplanning.nps.gov/wrst, by
clicking on the link entitled ‘‘Nabesna
ORV Management Plan EIS’’ and then
clicking on the link entitled ‘‘Document
List.’’
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive
Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
Drafting Information
The primary authors of this rule are
Bruce Rogers, Norah Martinez, and Peter
Christian, Wrangell-St. Elias National
Park and Preserve; Paul Hunter and
Andee Sears, NPS Alaska Regional
Office, and Jay P. Calhoun, Regulations
Program Specialist, National Park
Service, Regulations and Special Park
Uses.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 13
Alaska, National Parks, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
National Park Service amends 36 CFR
part 13 as set forth below:
PART 13—NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM
UNITS IN ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 13
continues to read as follows:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 462(k), 3101 et
seq.; Subpart N also issued under 16 U.S.C.
1a–2(h), 20, 1361, 1531, 3197; Pub. L. 105–
277, 112 Stat. 2681–259, October 21, 1998;
Pub. L. 106–31, 113 Stat. 72, May 21, 1999;
Sec. 13.1204 also issued under Sec. 1035,
Pub. L. 104–333, 110 Stat. 4240.
Subpart V—Special Regulations—
Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and
Preserve
2. Add § 13.1914 to subpart V to read
as follows:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:55 Aug 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
§ 13.1914 Off-road motor vehicle use in the
Nabesna District.
(a) What is the scope of this
regulation? The regulations contained in
paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section
apply to the use of motor vehicles off
roads within the boundaries of the
Nabesna District within Wrangell-St.
Elias National Park and Preserve. This
section does not affect the use of
snowmobiles or snowmachines.
(b) What terms do I need to know?
The following definitions apply only to
the regulations in this section:
FEIS Wilderness Area means an area
of designated wilderness identified on
the Upper Copper/Jacksina Wilderness
map available at the Slana Ranger
Station, the Main Park Visitor Center,
the Tanada and Copper Lake trailheads,
and on the park Web site.
Frozen means frost depth of 6 inches
as measured with a soil probe and
determined by the Superintendent.
Improved means a trail that is in a
design-sustainable or maintainable
condition as determined by the
Superintendent.
Nabesna District means a designated
area in the northern portion of
Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and
Preserve as shown on a map available at
the Slana Ranger Station, the Main Park
Visitor Center, and on the park Web site.
Recreational use means the use of an
off-road vehicle for any purpose other
than for subsistence uses, which are
defined in § 13.420, or access to
inholdings in accordance with 43 CFR
36.10.
Trail corridor means an area
extending 0.5 miles from either side of
the centerline on the Black Mountain
trails and portions of the Tanada Lake
trail within the FEIS Wilderness Area.
(c) Must I obtain a permit to operate
an off-road vehicle for recreational use?
(1) You must obtain a permit before
operating an off-road vehicle for
recreational use. Permits may be
obtained at the Slana Ranger Station in
Slana or the Main Park Visitor Center in
Copper Center.
(2) The Superintendent may issue
permits for the recreational use of offroad vehicles on any of the following
trails in the National Preserve:
(i) Suslota Trail.
(ii) Caribou Creek Trail.
(iii) Trail Creek Trail.
(iv) Lost Creek Trail.
(v) Soda Lake Trail.
(vi) Reeve Field Trail.
(3) Permits may be issued for the
recreational use of off-road vehicles
only on designated trails that are either
frozen or improved. A map showing
trails designated for recreational offroad vehicle use, and a current list of
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
frozen and improved trails, are available
at Slana Ranger Station, the Main
Visitor Center, and on the park’s Web
site.
(4) You must obtain a permit for each
off-road vehicle that you want to use for
recreational purposes on designated offroad vehicle trails. The operator of the
off-road vehicle must have the permit in
his or her possession when the off-road
vehicle is in use.
(5) Violating any term or condition of
a permit is prohibited.
(6) The recreational use of off-road
vehicles without a permit is prohibited.
(d) May I operate an off-road vehicle
for subsistence uses in the FEIS
Wilderness Area?
(1) In the FEIS Wilderness Area, local
rural residents may operate off-road
vehicles for subsistence uses as defined
by this part on the following trails:
(i) Black Mountain Trails.
(ii) Tanada Lake Trail.
(2) In the FEIS Wilderness Area, offroad vehicles may be operated off the
designated trails only for the purpose of
game retrieval in the designated trail
corridors.
(3) All other areas of the FEIS
Wilderness Area are closed to
subsistence ORV use and local rural
residents may not operate an off-road
vehicle for subsistence uses outside of
the trails and trail corridors identified in
paragraphs (d)(1)–(2) of this section.
(4) Trails and trail corridors in the
FEIS Wilderness Area, and the
boundaries of the FEIS Wilderness Area,
are shown on the Upper Copper/
Jacksina Wilderness map available at
the Slana Ranger Station, the Main Park
Visitor Center, the Tanada and Copper
Lake trailheads, and on the park Web
site.
(e) Are there limits on the types of offroad vehicles that may be operated off
roads in the Nabesna District of
Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and
Preserve? The following types of
vehicles may not be used off roads for
recreational or subsistence uses in the
Nabesna District of Wrangell-St. Elias
National Park and Preserve:
(1) Nodwells or other tracked rigs
greater than 5.5 feet in width or 4,000
pounds curb weight.
(2) Street-legal highway vehicles.
(3) Custom 4x4 jeeps, SUVs, or trucks
designed for off-road use.
(4) Original or modified ‘‘deuce and a
half’’ cargo trucks.
(5) Dozers, skid-steer loaders,
excavators, or other construction
equipment.
(6) Motorcycles or dirt bikes.
(7) Log skidders.
(8) Wheeled vehicles (including all
terrain vehicles, utility vehicles, and
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Argos) exceeding 1,500 pounds curb
weight, not including trailers.
Dated: July 30, 2014.
Rachel Jacobson,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish
and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2014–19740 Filed 8–19–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–EJ–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2013–0713; FRL–9915–40–
Region 10]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Washington:
Kent, Seattle, and Tacoma Second 10Year PM10 Limited Maintenance Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The EPA is approving a
limited maintenance plan submitted by
the State of Washington on November
29, 2013, for the Kent, Seattle, and
Tacoma maintenance areas for
particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter less than or equal to a nominal
10 micrometers (PM10). The EPA first
identified these areas in 1987 as
potentially violating the 24-hour PM10
national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS). All three areas have been
attaining the NAAQS since 1990, due to
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
measures such as a residential wood
smoke control program, a prohibition on
outdoor burning, and industrial
controls. The areas were redesignated to
attainment for the 24-hour PM10
NAAQS effective May 2001, when the
EPA approved the first 10-year
maintenance plan. This limited
maintenance plan covers the second 10year maintenance period ending in May
2021. The EPA received one set of
adverse comments focused primarily on
proposed coal export terminals that may
be built in the Pacific Northwest or
possible expansion of coal export
terminals in Canada that may impact the
three maintenance areas in the future.
DATES: This final rule is effective
September 19, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2013–0713. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information the disclosure
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:55 Aug 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
of which is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in
hard copy form. Publicly available
docket materials are available either
electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Programs Unit, Office of Air
Waste and Toxics, EPA Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. The
EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the individual listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Hunt at telephone number: (206) 553–
0256, email address: hunt.jeff@epa.gov,
or the above EPA, Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we
are giving meaning to certain words or
initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials ‘‘Act’’ or
‘‘CAA’’ mean or refer to the Clean Air
Act, unless the context indicates
otherwise.
(ii) The words ‘‘EPA’’, ‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’ or
our mean or refer to the United States
Environmental Protection Agency.
(iii) The initials ‘‘SIP’’ mean or refer
to State Implementation Plan.
(iv) The words ‘‘Washington’’ and
‘‘State’’ mean the State of Washington.
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Response to Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
I. Background Information
On August 7, 1987, the EPA identified
portions of Kent, Seattle, and Tacoma as
‘‘Group I’’ areas of concern for having a
greater than 95% probability of violating
the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS (52 FR
29383). On November 15, 1990, the
Group I areas of Kent, Seattle, and
Tacoma were designated as
nonattainment for PM10 by operation of
law upon enactment of the Clean Air
Act Amendments. The Washington
Department of Ecology (Ecology) and
the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency
(PSCAA) worked with the communities
of Kent, Seattle, and Tacoma to establish
PM10 pollution control strategies.
Primary control strategies for the three
areas included a residential wood
smoke control program, a prohibition on
open burning, and industrial emission
controls. These control measures were
highly successful, with monitoring data
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
49239
showing Kent, Seattle, and Tacoma
meeting the PM10 NAAQS since 1987,
1990, and 1989, respectively, with
further declines in PM10 levels in
subsequent years.
The EPA fully approved the PM10
attainment plans for Kent, Seattle, and
Tacoma on July 27, 1993, October 26,
1995, and October 25, 1995, respectively
(58 FR 40059, 60 FR 54812, and 60 FR
54599). The EPA then approved a 10year maintenance plan redesignating all
three areas from nonattainment to
attainment, making them maintenance
areas effective May 14, 2001 (66 FR
14492). The limited maintenance plan
that the EPA is approving in this final
rule was submitted to fulfill the second
10-year planning requirement in section
175A(b) of the Clean Air Act, to ensure
compliance with the PM10 NAAQS
through May 14, 2021. The EPA
proposed approval of this limited
maintenance plan on December 26, 2013
(78 FR 78311).
II. Response to Comments
On March 10, 2014, the EPA received
one set of comments opposing the EPA’s
proposed approval of the PM10 limited
maintenance plan for Kent, Seattle and
Tacoma. The comments primarily focus
on the potential impact that three coal
export terminals, proposed to be built in
the Pacific Northwest, could have on
PM10 concentrations in the maintenance
areas. The commenter also raises the
possibility of other similar impacts if
there is an increase in locomotive traffic
related to tar sands/oil shipments or
expansion of Canadian coal export
terminals. Lastly, the commenter
questions the methodology used by the
EPA, PSCAA, and Ecology in estimating
emissions in the 2011 emissions
inventory from current rail traffic to
Canadian coal export terminals that may
pass through the maintenance areas.
These comments are similar to
comments previously submitted on
February 22, 2013, related to emissions
impacts of locomotive coal transport in
the emissions inventory for the Tacoma
fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
nonattainment area (Docket No. EPA–
R10–OAR–2012–0712). The EPA
responded to these comments in the
May 29, 2013 final rulemaking
approving the inventory explaining that
we found no trends of increased PM2.5
impacts from coal dust at the chemical
speciation monitor using data as of
2011, or increases in ambient
concentrations of PM2.5 generally,
corresponding to the increased
locomotive traffic from 2008 to 2011
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49232-49239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19740]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 13
[NPS-WRST-15781; PPAKWRSTPO, PPMPSAS1Z.YP0000]
RIN 1024-AE14
Special Regulations, Areas of the National Park System, Wrangell-
St. Elias National Park and Preserve; Off-Road Vehicles
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service is amending its special regulations
for Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve to designate trails
in the portion of the Nabesna District located within the National
Preserve where motor vehicles may be used off roads for recreational
purposes. The rule prohibits the use of certain types of vehicles based
upon size and weight, and closes certain areas in designated wilderness
within the Nabesna District that are located outside of established
trails and trail corridors to the use of motor vehicles for
subsistence.
DATES: This rule is effective September 19, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Obernesser, Superintendent,
Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve, P.O. Box 439, Copper
Center, Alaska 99573. Phone (907) 822-7202. Email: AKR_Regulations@nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The approximately 13.2-million-acre Wrangell-St. Elias National
Park and Preserve (Wrangell-St. Elias) was established in 1980 by the
Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) (Pub. L. 96-
487, Dec. 2 1980; 16 U.S.C. 410hh-410hh5; 3101-3233). Wrangell-St.
Elias consists of approximately 8.3 million acres of land designated as
a National Park and approximately 4.8 million acres of land designated
as a National Preserve. Section 201(9) of ANILCA (16 U.S.C. 410hh(9))
directed that Wrangell-St. Elias be managed for the following purposes:
To maintain unimpaired the scenic beauty and quality of
high mountain peaks, foothills, glacial systems, lakes and streams,
valleys, and coastal landscapes in their natural state.
To protect habitat for, and populations of, fish and
wildlife including but not limited to caribou, brown/grizzly bears,
Dall's sheep, moose, wolves, trumpeter swans and other waterfowl, and
marine mammals.
To provide continued opportunities, including reasonable
access for mountain climbing, mountaineering, and other wilderness
recreational activities.
That provision of ANILCA also directed that subsistence uses by local
residents be permitted in the park, where such uses are traditional, in
accordance with the provisions of Title VIII of ANILCA.
Section 203 of ANILCA (16 U.S.C. 410hh-2) directed the Secretary of
the Interior, acting through the National Park Service (NPS), to
administer Wrangell-St. Elias as a new area of the National Park
System, pursuant to the provisions of the National Park Service Organic
Act of 1916 (Organic Act) (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.). In the Organic Act,
Congress granted the NPS broad authority to regulate the use of areas
under its jurisdiction provided that the associated impacts will leave
the ``scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life
[in these areas] unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.''
Section 3 of the Organic Act authorizes the Secretary of the Interior,
acting through NPS, to ``make and publish such rules and regulations as
he may deem necessary or proper for the use and management of the
parks.''
Wilderness
Section 701 of ANILCA designated approximately 9.6 million acres
within Wrangell-St. Elias as wilderness, a portion of which is located
within the Nabesna District. Section 707 of ANILCA provides that,
``[e]xcept as otherwise expressly provided for in this Act . . . ,''
wilderness designated by ANILCA shall be administered in accordance
with the Wilderness Act. According to the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C.
1131-1136), these lands are to be ``administered for the use and
enjoyment of the American people in such manner as will leave them
unimpaired for future use and enjoyment as wilderness, and so as to
provide for the protection of these areas, [and] the preservation of
their wilderness character . . . .''
Access for Subsistence Uses
ANILCA authorizes certain methods of access for subsistence
purposes that would otherwise be prohibited under Federal law or
general NPS regulations. Section 811(a) of ANILCA (16 U.S.C. 3121(a))
provides that ``rural residents engaged in subsistence uses shall have
reasonable access to subsistence resources on the public lands.''
Section 811(b) of ANILCA (16 U.S.C. 3121(b)) provides that
``[n]otwithstanding any other provision of this Act or other law, the
Secretary shall permit on the public lands appropriate use for
subsistence purposes of snowmobiles, motorboats, and other means of
surface transportation traditionally employed for such purpose by local
residents, subject to reasonable regulation.''
NPS implemented Section 811 of ANILCA (16 U.S.C. 3121) in 36 CFR
13.460(a), which states ``[n]otwithstanding any other provision of this
chapter, the use of . . . other means of surface transportation
traditionally employed by local rural residents engaged in subsistence
uses is permitted within park areas except at those times and in those
areas restricted or closed by the Superintendent.'' The 1986 General
Management Plan for Wrangell-St. Elias determined off-road vehicles
(ORVs) were a means of surface transportation traditionally employed by
local rural residents for subsistence purposes. Title 36, Code of
Federal Regulations, section 13.460(b)-(c) authorizes the
Superintendent to restrict or close routes or areas to a certain use
after notice and a public hearing ``if the Superintendent determines
that such use is causing or is likely to cause an adverse impact on
public health and safety, resource protection, protection of historic
or scientific values, subsistence uses, conservation of endangered or
threatened species, or the purposes for which the park was
established.''
Off-Road Vehicles
The subsistence use of motor vehicles off roads in Wrangell-St.
Elias is governed by Section 811(b) of ANILCA (16 U.S.C. 3121(b)) and
36 CFR 13.460. Separate legal authorities govern other uses of motor
vehicles off roads in Wrangell-St. Elias. Under 43 CFR 36.11(g)(1),
non-subsistence use of off-road vehicles is generally prohibited,
except on routes designated by NPS in accordance with Executive Order
11644, or pursuant to a valid permit issued under 43 CFR 36.11(g)(2),
43 CFR 36.10, or 43 CFR 36.12.
Executive Order 11644, ``Use of Off-Road Vehicles on the Public
Lands,'' issued in 1972 and amended in 1977 by Executive Order 11989,
required federal agencies to issue regulations designating specific
areas and routes on public lands where the use of ORVs may be
[[Page 49233]]
permitted. NPS implemented these Executive Orders in 36 CFR 4.10, which
prohibits the use of motor vehicles off established roads unless routes
and areas are designated for off-road motor vehicle use by special
regulation. Under 36 CFR 4.10(b), such routes and areas ``may be
designated only in national recreation areas, national seashores,
national lakeshores and national preserves.'' Under 36 CFR 4.10(b), the
designation of ORV routes must comply with Executive Order 11644, as
amended, which requires that they be located:
To minimize damage to soil, watershed, vegetation, or
other resources of the public lands.
To minimize harassment of wildlife or significant
disruption of wildlife habitat.
To minimize conflicts between ORV use and other existing
or proposed recreational uses of the same or neighboring public lands,
and to ensure the compatibility of such uses with existing conditions
in populated areas, taking into account noise and other factors.
In areas of the National Park System only if the
respective agency head determines that ORV use in such locations will
not adversely affect their natural, aesthetic, or scenic values.
Executive Order 11644 also requires that NPS ensure adequate
opportunity for public participation when designating areas and trails
for ORV use.
History of ORV Use in the Nabesna District of Wrangell-St. Elias
ORV use in the Nabesna District commenced after World War II when
surplus military vehicles were used by hunters, miners, and others for
personal use and access to remote areas. In the late 1970s, the all-
terrain vehicle (typically three- or four-wheelers) emerged as a new
and more affordable mode of cross-country travel in rural Alaska. When
Wrangell-St. Elias was created in 1980, there was an established trail
network in the Nabesna District. These trails were used by recreational
and subsistence users, as well as a means to access private inholdings.
The 1986 General Management Plan for Wrangell-St. Elias determined that
ORVs are a traditional means of accessing subsistence resources by
local residents.
In 1983, Wrangell-St. Elias began issuing permits for recreational
ORV use on nine established trails under 43 CFR 36.11(g)(2). This
regulation provides superintendents authority to issue permits allowing
ORV use on existing trails in areas that are not designated wilderness
upon a finding that the ORV use ``would be compatible with the purposes
and values for which the area was established.'' The permits require
users to stay on existing trails and adhere to certain conditions. The
number of permits issued for recreational ORV use rose from 64 in 1985
to 263 in 2010.
Since 1986, Wrangell-St. Elias has conducted two major studies of
ORV impacts, and a detailed survey and inventory of physical conditions
along the existing trails in the Nabesna District. These studies
demonstrated that ORV use over wet areas leads to trail braiding and
widening. Vegetation does not recover quickly, soils erode, permafrost
depth changes, and impacts to surface hydrology occur. Of the nine
trails in the Nabesna District, the Tanada Lake, Copper Lake, Reeves
Field, and Suslota trails have substantial sections with degraded
conditions.
On June 29, 2006, the National Parks Conservation Association,
Alaska Center for the Environment, and the Wilderness Society filed a
lawsuit against NPS in the United States District Court for the
District of Alaska. The plaintiffs challenged the method used by NPS to
issue recreational ORV permits for the nine trails within the Nabesna
District. They asserted that when issuing recreational ORV permits, NPS
failed to make the compatibility finding required by 43 CFR 36.11(g)(2)
and failed to prepare an environmental analysis of recreational ORV use
as required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).
The plaintiffs did not challenge the use of ORVs for subsistence uses.
In a settlement agreement announced on May 15, 2007, NPS agreed to
suspend issuing recreational ORV permits for three specific trails
unless the ground is frozen. NPS also agreed to prepare an
environmental impact statement under NEPA and issue a record of
decision.
Environmental Impact Statement and Selected Action
On December 21, 2007, NPS published a Notice of Intent to prepare
an environmental impact statement in the Federal Register. The initial
planning process included extensive public involvement, public
meetings, agency consultation, and tribal consultation. The Nabesna
Off-Road Vehicle Management Plan/Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) was released to the public on August 11, 2010. During the 90-day
public comment period, which included public meetings and briefings,
NPS received 153 comment letters. NPS responses to public comments were
included in the Final Environmental Impact Statement Nabesna Off-Road
Vehicle Management Plan (FEIS) published in August 2011. The FEIS
describes major impacts to soils, wetlands, and vegetation associated
with ORV use on unimproved trails. It also describes moderate to major
impacts to wilderness character associated with subsistence ORV use in
designated wilderness.
On December 14, 2011, the Regional Director signed a Record of
Decision (ROD) which identified Alternative 6 in the FEIS as the
selected action. The selected action provides continued opportunities
for appropriate and reasonable access to backcountry recreation. The
selected action also accommodates subsistence use and access to
inholdings, and protects scenic views, fish and wildlife habitat, and
other resources and values of Wrangell-St. Elias.
Under the selected action, NPS will improve the most degraded
segments of ORV trails in the Nabesna District through trail re-routing
or reconstruction to a design-sustainable or maintainable condition (as
those terms are defined in the FEIS). A design-sustainable or
maintainable condition ensures that ORV users can stay on one trail
alignment and that damage to soils, watersheds, vegetation, and other
resources are minimized. The FEIS estimates that for the six trails in
the National Preserve, trail improvements will result in the recovery
of 204.6 acres of wetland habitat and 212.7 acres of vegetation
habitat. The FEIS also projects that each of the improved trails in the
National Preserve will have between 50 and 180 ORV round trips per year
(depending upon the trail and including both recreational and
subsistence use), most of these occurring during hunting season.
In accordance with 36 CFR 4.10(b), the rule authorizes recreational
ORV use on improved or frozen trails in the portion of the Nabesna
District located within the National Preserve, but not in the National
Park. In the area of designated wilderness included in the FEIS (FEIS
Wilderness Area), subsistence ORV users generally must stay on
designated trails; however, off-trail ORV use is authorized in
designated trail corridors (i.e., 0.5 miles on either side of the
trail) for the sole purpose of game retrieval. All other areas of the
FEIS Wilderness Area are closed to subsistence ORV use. The FEIS
Wilderness Area is approximately 541,000 acres of designated
wilderness, bordered by Drop Creek on the west, the Nabesna Glacier on
the east, and Mt. Sanford and Mt. Jarvis on the south. Trails and trail
corridors in the FEIS
[[Page 49234]]
Wilderness Area, and the boundaries of the FEIS Wilderness Area, are
identified on the Upper Copper/Jacksina Wilderness map available at the
Slana Ranger Station, the Main Park Visitor Center, the Tanada and
Copper Lake trailheads, and on the park's Web site at https://www.nps.gov/wrst. In the portion of the Nabesna District located
outside of the FEIS Wilderness Area, subsistence ORV use is allowed on
or off ORV trails before and after trail improvements. NPS will monitor
the use and take management actions as described in the FEIS. The rule
precludes the use of certain types of vehicles based upon vehicle size
and weight.
The DEIS, FEIS, ROD, and other supporting documents can be found
online at https://www.parkplanning.nps.gov/wrst, by clicking on the link
entitled ``Nabesna ORV Management Plan EIS'' and then clicking on the
link entitled ``Document List.''
Final Rule
Summary of Final Rule
The rule amends the special regulations for Wrangell-St. Elias at
36 CFR part 13, subpart V, to implement the selected action in the ROD.
Pursuant to 36 CFR 4.10(b), the rule designates six trails in the
National Preserve for recreational ORV use. Recreational ORV users are
required to obtain a permit to use the designated trails. Permits will
be issued only for frozen trails or trails in a design-sustainable or
maintainable condition, as determined by the Superintendent. The rule
requires that subsistence ORV users stay on trails or within trail
corridors in the FEIS Wilderness Area. The rule also establishes
vehicle weight and size limits to protect park resources. Through
implementation of the selected action in the ROD, Wrangell-St. Elias
will continue to protect and preserve natural and cultural resources
and natural processes, and provide a variety of safe visitor
experiences while minimizing conflicts among users.
Recreational ORV Use
The following trails in the National Preserve are designated for
recreational ORV use: Suslota, Caribou Creek, Trail Creek, Lost Creek,
Soda Lake, and Reeve Field. Recreational ORV users are required to
obtain a permit to use the designated trails. Prior to trail
improvements, permits will be issued only for trails in fair or better
condition (Lost Creek, Soda Lake, and Trail Creek), except that permits
may be issued for any of the six designated trails in the National
Preserve when the Superintendent determines they are frozen. Frozen is
defined as frost depth of 6 inches as measured with a soil probe. NPS
will announce the completion of trail improvements and when trails are
frozen through a press release and notices posted at the Slana Ranger
Station, the Main Park Visitor Center, and on the park's Web site at
http:[sol][sol]www.nps.gov/wrst/planyourvisit/orv-trails.htm. After
trail improvements, permits will be issued for the additional trails in
the National Preserve (Suslota, Caribou Creek, and Reeve Field)
regardless of whether the trails are frozen. Recreational ORV use
permits will include the following conditions to protect park
resources:
Travel is only authorized on designated trails listed on
the permit.
ORVs must stay on the designated trails.
If hunting, gathering, or otherwise walking off the trail,
park ORVs off to the side of the trail; vehicles may not be used to
retrieve game off of the designated trail alignment.
Creating new trails is prohibited.
ORV use is prohibited in designated wilderness areas.
The rule prohibits recreational ORV use in the portion of the Nabesna
District located within the National Park. Maps of the trails
designated for recreational ORV use will be available at the Slana
Ranger Station and the Main Park Visitor Center, and on the park's Web
site at http:[sol][sol]www.nps.gov/wrst.
Subsistence ORV Use
For trails in the FEIS Wilderness Area (Black Mountain Trails and
the southern portions of the Tanada Lake Trail), the rule requires that
subsistence ORV users stay on trails or, when for the purpose of game
retrieval only, within identified trail corridors. The trail corridors
consist of 0.5 miles on either side of the trail. Travel outside of
these designated trail corridors in the FEIS Wilderness Area is
prohibited. Trails and trail corridors in the FEIS Wilderness Area, and
the boundaries of the FEIS Wilderness Area, are identified on the Upper
Copper/Jacksina Wilderness map available at the Slana Ranger Station
and the Main Park Visitor Center, and on the park's planning Web site
at http:[sol][sol]www.nps.gov/wrst. They are also identified at the
Tanada and Copper Lake trailheads.
Authorized Off-Road Vehicles
The rule also establishes the types of ORVs that may be operated
for recreational as well as subsistence uses. The following types of
vehicles, because of their size, width, weight, or high surface
pressure (measured, for example, in pounds per square inch) are
prohibited for recreational or subsistence uses:
Nodwells or other tracked rigs greater than 5.5 feet in
width or 4,000 pounds curb weight.
Street-legal highway vehicles.
Custom 4x4 jeeps, SUVs, or trucks designed for off-road
use.
Original or modified ``deuce and a half'' cargo trucks.
Dozers, skid-steer loaders, excavators, or other
construction equipment.
Motorcycles or dirt bikes.
Log skidders.
The rule requires that all wheeled vehicles (including all-terrain
vehicles, utility vehicles, and Argos) be less than 1,500 pounds curb
weight, not including trailers. Nothing in this rule supersedes the
applicable provisions of 36 CFR part 4 and 36 CFR 13.460(d), which
require that ORVs be operated in compliance with applicable state and
federal laws, and prohibit damaging park resources or harassing
wildlife.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section explains some of the principal elements of the rule in
a question and answer format.
What is an ``Off-Road Vehicle'' (ORV)?
Any motor vehicle, including all-terrain vehicles, designed for or
capable of cross-country travel on or immediately over land, water,
sand, snow, ice, marsh, wetland, or other natural terrain, except
snowmachines or snowmobiles. This definition does not include
snowmachines and the rule does not affect the use of snowmachines in
Wrangell-St. Elias.
What is recreational ORV use?
Any ORV use by individuals not engaged in subsistence uses as
defined in 36 CFR 13.420 or accessing an inholding. Recreational ORV
use in the portion of the Nabesna District located within the National
Preserve includes, but is not limited to, access for sport hunting,
fishing, and dispersed camping.
Do I need a permit to operate an ORV for recreational purposes?
Yes, if you are using the ORV for recreational use as defined
above. Permits for recreational ORV use may be obtained at the Main
Park Visitor Center in Copper Center or the Slana Ranger Station in
Slana.
Do I need a permit to operate an ORV for subsistence purposes?
No, not if you are a local rural resident as defined by 36 CFR
13.420
[[Page 49235]]
and are actively engaged in subsistence uses.
Is there a limit to the number of ORV permits available?
No, there is no limit to the number of permits that the
Superintendent may issue for recreational ORV use.
Several of my family members have ORVs that we would like to use for
recreational purposes on trails in the National Preserve. Do we need a
permit for each vehicle?
Yes, you need to obtain a permit for each vehicle that you want to
use for recreational purposes on designated ORV trails. The operator of
the ORV must have the permit in his or her possession when the ORV is
in use.
How long will permits be valid for ORV use?
When you apply for a permit, you must indicate how long you intend
to operate an ORV for recreational use. The NPS will determine the
duration of the permit based upon the requested time period and other
factors such as public health and safety, resource protection,
protection of cultural or scientific values, subsistence uses,
endangered or threatened species conservation, or other management
considerations necessary to ensure that ORV use is being managed in a
manner compatible with the purposes for which the park was established.
The duration of each permit will be stated in the terms and conditions
of the permit.
Where can I operate my ORV?
For recreational ORV users, designated trails will be listed on the
face of the permit and identified on maps available at the Slana Ranger
Station and the Main Park Visitor Center, and on the park's Web site at
https://www.nps.gov/wrst. Travel is only permitted on the trails listed
on the permit, which will include all of the trails designated for ORV
use by this rule that are either frozen or improved.
Will designated trails for recreational ORV users be marked on the
ground?
Yes, trails designated for recreational ORV use will be shown on a
map on a kiosk at the trailhead and will be marked on the ground with
carsonite posts.
Can I tow a trailer with my ORV on designated trails?
Yes, NPS recommends the use of low-pressure ``balloon'' style tires
on ORV trailers.
Are there any vehicle requirements for my ORV?
Yes, all ORVs are required to comply with the weight and size
limits specified in the rule. The rule also prohibits the use of
certain types of vehicles.
I am a local rural resident engaged in subsistence uses. What effect
does the rule have on me?
Your ORV must comply with the weight and size limits described in
the rule, and certain types of vehicles listed in the rule are
prohibited. On the trails in the FEIS Wilderness Area (Black Mountain
Trails and the southern portions of the Tanada Lake Trail), subsistence
ORV users generally must stay on trails; however, off-trail ORV use in
the FEIS Wilderness area is authorized in designated trail corridors
(i.e., 0.5 miles on either side of the trail) for the sole purpose of
game retrieval. All other areas of the FEIS Wilderness Area are closed
to subsistence ORV use.
How will designated trails and trail corridors for subsistence ORV
users in the FEIS Wilderness Area be identified?
The designated trails and trail corridors are identified on the
Upper Copper/Jacksina Wilderness map available at the Slana Ranger
Station and the Main Park Visitor Center, and on the park's Web site at
https://www.nps.gov/wrst. They are also identified at the Tanada and
Copper Lake trailheads.
Summary of and Responses to Public Comments
The NPS published the proposed rule at 79 FR 2608 (January 15,
2014). The NPS accepted comments through the mail, hand delivery, and
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments were accepted through March 17, 2014, and the NPS received
nine comments. A summary of comments and NPS responses is provided
below. Several comments supported the proposed rule and did not request
any change. After considering the public comments and after additional
review, the NPS did not make any substantive changes in the final rule.
The definition of ``ORV'' in the proposed rule was removed because
``off-road vehicle'' is already defined in 36 CFR 13.1. Other minor
changes were made for clarity.
1. Comment: One comment stated that the NPS should not allow any
recreational ORV use in the National Preserve because it would
detrimentally affect the National Park and cause severe degradation of
the National Preserve and its biodiversity.
NPS Response: Section 1313 of ANILCA (16 U.S.C. 3201) allows for
sport hunting and fishing in national preserves in Alaska. As noted in
the FEIS, there is a network of trails in the Nabesna District that
predates the establishment of Wrangell-St. Elias. These trails were
used by ORVs to access areas for sport and subsistence hunting, mining,
and access to private property. Part of the purpose of the Nabesna Off-
Road Vehicle Management Plan, as stated in the FEIS, is to provide
``access to sport hunting in the National Preserve'' that is compatible
with park purposes and values. The FEIS concluded that permitting
recreational ORV use on improved trails in the National Preserve was a
reasonable and appropriate means of access. The FEIS also concluded
that permitting recreational ORV use on frozen or improved trails in
the portion of the Nabesna District located within the National
Preserve would not result in significant impacts on the environment or
severe degradation of natural resources, including wildlife, in either
the National Park or the National Preserve.
2. Comment: One comment stated that the NPS should not allow any
recreational ORV use in the National Preserve because it would not
result in any economic benefit or increased tourism.
NPS Response: The NPS completed a cost-benefit analysis of the
selected action in a report entitled ``Cost-Benefit and Regulatory
Flexibility Analyses: Proposed Regulations for Management of Off Road
Vehicles in The Nabesna District of Wrangell-St. Elias National Park
and Preserve'' which can be viewed online at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/wrst, by clicking the link entitled ``Nabesna ORV
Management Plan EIS'' and then clicking the link entitled ``Document
List.'' This report concluded that the selected action will have
beneficial effects on trail condition, visitor opportunities, and
socioeconomics. It also concluded that the selected action will improve
economic efficiency.
3. Comment: The Alaska Quiet Rights Coalition stated that the NPS
should not allow any recreational ORV use in the National Preserve
because it would eliminate a quiet alternative to less protected public
lands.
NPS Response: The FEIS concluded that permitting recreational ORV
use on improved trails in the National Preserve would have ``minor,
long-term, adverse direct and indirect impacts to soundscapes'' because
of the low anticipated level of ORV use and because of the small
affected area
[[Page 49236]]
relative to other areas available for non-motorized activities. Because
of the minor impacts and relatively small area, the NPS determined that
recreational ORV use on certain trails in the National Preserve is an
appropriate way for individuals to experience and enjoy Wrangell-St.
Elias National Preserve.
4. Comment: Some commenters stated that it will be difficult for
the NPS to regulate and enforce the rules related to ORV use.
NPS Response: The NPS believes that it will be able to enforce the
rules related to ORV use for the following reasons:
Recreational ORV users are required to obtain a permit.
Most users will get their permit at the Slana Ranger Station where they
will receive information about local trail conditions and restrictions.
Recreational ORV users are required to have their permit with them when
the ORV is in use.
Trailheads are well-signed with kiosks that will indicate
whether or not the trail is open to recreational ORV use. Trails will
be marked on the ground with carsonite posts. Maps showing trails and
trail corridors for subsistence ORV users in designated wilderness will
be posted at the Copper Lake and Tanada Lake trailheads.
There is a full-time ranger stationed in Slana. Patrol of
the trails is a priority during hunting season.
This rule applies only to the Nabesna District, not the
entire 13.2 million acres of Wrangell St. Elias.
5. Comment: One commenter stated that ORVs should not be allowed
outside of trails and trail corridors when frozen because this could
damage soil and vegetation.
NPS Response: Recreational ORV users are required to stay on
trails. Within the FEIS Wilderness area, subsistence ORV users are
limited to trails and, for the purpose of game retrieval only, off-
trail in trail corridors. Outside the FEIS Wilderness Area, subsistence
ORV users are not limited to trails or trail corridors; however, the
NPS expects that ORV use under frozen conditions will be light to non-
existent because ORV use is driven by hunting seasons which typically
end on or before September 20th.
6. Comment: The State of Alaska ANILCA Implementation Program and
Citizen's Advisory Committee on Federal Areas (CACFA) suggested 43 CFR
36.11(g) as a mechanism to authorize recreational ORV use on improved
trails in the National Park since these trails are ``existing.''
NPS Response: Because the proposed re-routes of the most degraded
segments of ORV trails would take substantial resources to build,
deviate significantly from the current alignment, and result in a
different set of environmental impacts, the NPS does not believe these
re-routed trails are ``existing'' within the meaning of 43 CFR
36.11(g).
7. Comment: The State of Alaska ANILCA Implementation Program and
CACFA stated that recreational ORV use should be allowed on improved or
frozen trails in the National Park to provide affordable access to
hunting and fishing opportunities.
NPS Response: The NPS does not believe it is appropriate to allow
recreational ORV use in the National Park for the following reasons:
The primary use of recreational ORVs is to access areas
for sport hunting. Section 1313 of ANILCA (16 U.S.C. 3201) allows for
sport hunting in national preserves in Alaska, but this activity is not
permitted in the National Park.
This decision meets the objectives for the project as
stated in the FEIS and represents a balanced approach based upon public
comments received on the DEIS. This is further described in the section
entitled ``Basis for the Decision'' in the ROD that can be found online
at https://www.parkplanning.nps.gov/wrst, by clicking on the link
entitled ``Nabesna ORV Management Plan EIS'' and then clicking on the
link entitled ``Document List.''
Air taxis provide an alternative means of accessing remote
sport hunting in the National Preserve.
Improved trails in the National Park (e.g., Tanada Lake
Trail) will provide enhanced non-motorized access for recreational
activities.
8. Comment: CACFA stated that recreational ORV use should be
allowed on improved or frozen trails in the National Park because
ANILCA guarantees that these types of traditional uses would be allowed
to continue.
NPS Response: ANILCA does not address recreational ORV use in NPS
areas. Section 811 (16 U.S.C. 3121) speaks to subsistence access for
local rural residents. While section 1110(a) (16 U.S.C. 3170(a)) speaks
to the use of non-motorized surface transportation (as well as
snowmachines, motorboats, and airplanes) for traditional activities and
for travel to and from villages and homesites, it does not address
ORVs.
9. Comment: The State of Alaska ANILCA Implementation Program
stated that recreational ORV use should be allowed on improved or
frozen trails in the National Park because the same monitoring
protocols and management tools being applied to subsistence ORV use in
the National Park and National Preserve and non-subsistence ORV use in
the National Preserve would also detect and mitigate impacts from
recreational ORV use in the National Park.
NPS Response: It is true that the monitoring identified in the ROD
will help the NPS mitigate direct impacts to soils, vegetation, and
wetlands from all ORV use. However, the NPS is not monitoring impacts
to visitor opportunities, hunting competition (subsistence), or
soundscape that would occur if recreational ORV use were permitted in
the National Park.
10. Comment: One commenter stated that all wilderness areas should
be open to subsistence ORV use and that subsistence ORV use should not
be confined to trails and trail corridors.
NPS Response: The FEIS concludes that the closures in the FEIS
Wilderness Area are needed to prevent major impacts to the undeveloped
character of the designated wilderness. The closures are consistent
with the 1986 WRST GMP and Section 811(b) of ANILCA (16 U.S.C.
3121(b)), which states that the Secretary shall permit subsistence use
of ORVs traditionally employed by local residents, subject to
reasonable regulation.
Compliance With Other Laws, Executive Orders, and Department Policy
Use of Off-Road Vehicles on the Public Lands (Executive Orders 11644
and 11989)
Executive Order 11644, as amended by Executive Order 11989, was
adopted to address impacts on public lands from ORV use. The Executive
Order applies to ORV use on federal public lands that is not authorized
under a valid lease, permit, contract, or license. Section 3(a)(4) of
Executive Order 11644 provides that ORV ``[a]reas and trails shall be
located in areas of the National Park System, Natural Areas, or
National Wildlife Refuges and Game Ranges only if the respective agency
head determines that off-road vehicle use in such locations will not
adversely affect their natural, aesthetic, or scenic values.'' Since
the Executive Order clearly was not intended to prohibit all ORV use
everywhere in these units, the term ``adversely affect'' does not have
the same meaning as the somewhat similar terms ``adverse impact'' and
``adverse effect'' used in the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA). In analyses under NEPA, a procedural statute that provides
for the study of environmental impacts, the term ``adverse effect''
includes minor or negligible effects.
[[Page 49237]]
Section 3(a)(4) of the Executive Order, by contrast, concerns
substantive management decisions and must be read in the context of the
authorities applicable to such decisions. Wrangell-St. Elias is an area
of the National Park System. Therefore, NPS interprets the Executive
Order term ``adversely affect'' consistent with its NPS Management
Policies 2006. Those policies require that the NPS only allow
``appropriate use'' of parks and avoid ``unacceptable impacts.''
This rule is consistent with those requirements. It will not impede
attainment of Wrangell-St. Elias's desired future conditions for
natural and cultural resources as identified in the FEIS. NPS has
determined that this rule will not unreasonably interfere with the
atmosphere of peace and tranquility or the natural soundscape
maintained in natural locations within Wrangell-St. Elias. Therefore,
within the context of the resources and values of Wrangell-St. Elias,
motor vehicle use on the routes and areas designated by this rule
(which are also subject to resource closures and other management
measures that will be implemented under the selected action in the ROD)
will not cause an unacceptable impact to the natural, aesthetic, or
scenic values of Wrangell-St. Elias.
Section 8(a) of the Executive Order requires agency heads to
monitor the effects of ORV use on lands under their jurisdictions. On
the basis of information gathered, agency heads may from time to time
amend or rescind designations of areas or other actions as necessary to
further the policy of the Executive Order. The selected action in the
ROD includes monitoring and resource protection procedures and periodic
review to provide for the ongoing evaluation of impacts of motor
vehicle use on protected resources. The Superintendent has authority to
take appropriate action as needed to protect park resources.
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget will
review all significant rules. OIRA has determined that this rule is not
significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order
12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public
participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this
rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This rule will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.). This certification is based on the cost-benefit and regulatory
flexibility analyses found in the report entitled ``Cost-Benefit and
Regulatory Flexibility Analyses: Proposed Regulations for Management of
Off Road Vehicles in The Nabesna District of Wrangell-St. Elias
National Park and Preserve'' which can be viewed online at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/wrst, by clicking the link entitled ``Nabesna ORV
Management Plan EIS'' and then clicking the link entitled ``Document
List.''
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the SBREFA.
This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, federal, state, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S. based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local or tribal governments or the private sector. A statement
containing the information required by the UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, this rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism summary impact statement. The rule is
limited in effect to federal lands managed by the NPS and does not have
a substantial direct effect on state and local government in Alaska. A
Federalism summary impact statement is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175 and Department
Policy) and ANCSA Corporations
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian Tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian Tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this
rule under the Department's consultation and Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act (ANCSA) Native Corporation policies. While the NPS has
determined the rule would not have a substantial direct effect on
federally recognized Indian tribes or ANCSA Native Corporation lands,
water areas, or resources, the NPS has consulted Alaska Native tribes
and Alaska Native Corporations regarding implementation of this rule.
Consultation occurred through bi-annual government to government
meetings with Cheesh`na tribal council and Mentasta traditional village
council. In addition, a letter was sent to each tribal entity within
the park's resident zone communities and to Ahtna Native Corporation,
Inc. when the proposed rule was published in the Federal Register.
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
This rule does not contain any new collections of information that
require approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act. OMB has approved the
[[Page 49238]]
information collection requirements associated with NPS Special Park
Use Permits and has assigned OMB Control Number 1024-0026 (expires 08/
31/16). An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
This rule constitutes a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. We have prepared the
FEIS under the NEPA. The FEIS is summarized above and available online
at https://www.parkplanning.nps.gov/wrst, by clicking on the link
entitled ``Nabesna ORV Management Plan EIS'' and then clicking on the
link entitled ``Document List.''
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Drafting Information
The primary authors of this rule are Bruce Rogers, Norah Martinez,
and Peter Christian, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve;
Paul Hunter and Andee Sears, NPS Alaska Regional Office, and Jay P.
Calhoun, Regulations Program Specialist, National Park Service,
Regulations and Special Park Uses.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 13
Alaska, National Parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service amends
36 CFR part 13 as set forth below:
PART 13--NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM UNITS IN ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for part 13 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1, 3, 462(k), 3101 et seq.; Subpart N also
issued under 16 U.S.C. 1a-2(h), 20, 1361, 1531, 3197; Pub. L. 105-
277, 112 Stat. 2681-259, October 21, 1998; Pub. L. 106-31, 113 Stat.
72, May 21, 1999; Sec. 13.1204 also issued under Sec. 1035, Pub. L.
104-333, 110 Stat. 4240.
Subpart V--Special Regulations--Wrangell-St. Elias National Park
and Preserve
0
2. Add Sec. 13.1914 to subpart V to read as follows:
Sec. 13.1914 Off-road motor vehicle use in the Nabesna District.
(a) What is the scope of this regulation? The regulations contained
in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section apply to the use of motor
vehicles off roads within the boundaries of the Nabesna District within
Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve. This section does not
affect the use of snowmobiles or snowmachines.
(b) What terms do I need to know? The following definitions apply
only to the regulations in this section:
FEIS Wilderness Area means an area of designated wilderness
identified on the Upper Copper/Jacksina Wilderness map available at the
Slana Ranger Station, the Main Park Visitor Center, the Tanada and
Copper Lake trailheads, and on the park Web site.
Frozen means frost depth of 6 inches as measured with a soil probe
and determined by the Superintendent.
Improved means a trail that is in a design-sustainable or
maintainable condition as determined by the Superintendent.
Nabesna District means a designated area in the northern portion of
Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve as shown on a map
available at the Slana Ranger Station, the Main Park Visitor Center,
and on the park Web site.
Recreational use means the use of an off-road vehicle for any
purpose other than for subsistence uses, which are defined in Sec.
13.420, or access to inholdings in accordance with 43 CFR 36.10.
Trail corridor means an area extending 0.5 miles from either side
of the centerline on the Black Mountain trails and portions of the
Tanada Lake trail within the FEIS Wilderness Area.
(c) Must I obtain a permit to operate an off-road vehicle for
recreational use? (1) You must obtain a permit before operating an off-
road vehicle for recreational use. Permits may be obtained at the Slana
Ranger Station in Slana or the Main Park Visitor Center in Copper
Center.
(2) The Superintendent may issue permits for the recreational use
of off-road vehicles on any of the following trails in the National
Preserve:
(i) Suslota Trail.
(ii) Caribou Creek Trail.
(iii) Trail Creek Trail.
(iv) Lost Creek Trail.
(v) Soda Lake Trail.
(vi) Reeve Field Trail.
(3) Permits may be issued for the recreational use of off-road
vehicles only on designated trails that are either frozen or improved.
A map showing trails designated for recreational off-road vehicle use,
and a current list of frozen and improved trails, are available at
Slana Ranger Station, the Main Visitor Center, and on the park's Web
site.
(4) You must obtain a permit for each off-road vehicle that you
want to use for recreational purposes on designated off-road vehicle
trails. The operator of the off-road vehicle must have the permit in
his or her possession when the off-road vehicle is in use.
(5) Violating any term or condition of a permit is prohibited.
(6) The recreational use of off-road vehicles without a permit is
prohibited.
(d) May I operate an off-road vehicle for subsistence uses in the
FEIS Wilderness Area?
(1) In the FEIS Wilderness Area, local rural residents may operate
off-road vehicles for subsistence uses as defined by this part on the
following trails:
(i) Black Mountain Trails.
(ii) Tanada Lake Trail.
(2) In the FEIS Wilderness Area, off-road vehicles may be operated
off the designated trails only for the purpose of game retrieval in the
designated trail corridors.
(3) All other areas of the FEIS Wilderness Area are closed to
subsistence ORV use and local rural residents may not operate an off-
road vehicle for subsistence uses outside of the trails and trail
corridors identified in paragraphs (d)(1)-(2) of this section.
(4) Trails and trail corridors in the FEIS Wilderness Area, and the
boundaries of the FEIS Wilderness Area, are shown on the Upper Copper/
Jacksina Wilderness map available at the Slana Ranger Station, the Main
Park Visitor Center, the Tanada and Copper Lake trailheads, and on the
park Web site.
(e) Are there limits on the types of off-road vehicles that may be
operated off roads in the Nabesna District of Wrangell-St. Elias
National Park and Preserve? The following types of vehicles may not be
used off roads for recreational or subsistence uses in the Nabesna
District of Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve:
(1) Nodwells or other tracked rigs greater than 5.5 feet in width
or 4,000 pounds curb weight.
(2) Street-legal highway vehicles.
(3) Custom 4x4 jeeps, SUVs, or trucks designed for off-road use.
(4) Original or modified ``deuce and a half'' cargo trucks.
(5) Dozers, skid-steer loaders, excavators, or other construction
equipment.
(6) Motorcycles or dirt bikes.
(7) Log skidders.
(8) Wheeled vehicles (including all terrain vehicles, utility
vehicles, and
[[Page 49239]]
Argos) exceeding 1,500 pounds curb weight, not including trailers.
Dated: July 30, 2014.
Rachel Jacobson,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2014-19740 Filed 8-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-EJ-P