New Standards to Enhance Business Reply Mail (BRM) Visibility, 48717-48719 [2014-19433]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 159 / Monday, August 18, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
and Harbors Act of 1917 (40 Stat 266;
33 U.S.C. 1) and Chapter XIX of the
Army Appropriations Act of 1919 (40
Stat 892; 33 U.S.C. 3), the Corps is
proposing to amend the regulations in
33 CFR Part 334 by establishing a new
restricted area.
Procedural Requirements
a. Review Under Executive Order
12866. This proposed rule is issued
with respect to a military function of the
Defense Department and the provisions
of Executive Order 12866 do not apply.
b. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. This proposed rule has
been reviewed under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (Public Law 96–354)
which requires the preparation of a
regulatory flexibility analysis for any
regulation that will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities (i.e., small
businesses and small governments).
Unless information is obtained to the
contrary during the public notice
comment period, the Corps expects that
the economic impact of the proposed
restricted area would have practically
no impact on the public, any anticipated
navigational hazard or interference with
existing waterway traffic. This proposed
rule, if adopted, will have no significant
economic impact on small entities.
c. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act. The Corps
expects that the proposed rule will not
have a significant impact to the quality
of the human environment and,
therefore, preparation of an
environmental impact statement will
not be required. An environmental
assessment will be prepared after the
public notice period is closed and all
comments have been received and
considered. After it is prepared, it may
be reviewed at the District office listed
at the end of the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT, above.
d. Unfunded Mandates Act . The
proposed rule does not impose an
enforceable duty among the private
sector and, therefore, is not a Federal
private sector mandate and is not
subject to the requirements of Section
202 or 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (Public Laws 104–4, 109
Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). We have
also found, under Section 203 of the
Act, that small governments will not be
significantly or uniquely affected by this
rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 334
Danger Zones, Navigation (water),
Restricted Areas, Waterways.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Corps proposes to amend
33 CFR Part 334 as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Aug 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
PART 334—DANGER ZONE AND
RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 33 CFR
part 334 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 40 Stat. 266 (33 U.S.C. 1) and
40 Stat. 892 (33 U.S.C. 3).
■
2. Add § 334.781 to read as follows:
§ 334.781 Huntington Ingalls Incorporated/
Ingalls Shipbuilding and Dry Dock (HII)/
Supervisor of Shipbuilding, Conversion and
Repair (SUPSHIP), Gulf Coast, Pascagoula,
Mississippi; Naval Restricted Area.
(a) The area. The datum for all
coordinates is in NAD83 in accordance
with § 334.6. The restricted area shall
encompass all navigable waters of the
United States, as defined at part 329 of
this chapter, contiguous to the area
identified as HII and the mean high
water level within an area contained in
an ‘‘L’’ shaped area bounded by the
shore on the west and north ends of the
area and bounded by buoys on the east
and south sides of the area starting at:
Latitude N 30°21.13′ longitude W
88°34.09′, thence to latitude N 30°21.08′
longitude W 88°34.09′, thence to
latitude N 30°21.03′ longitude W
88°34.09′, thence to latitude N 30°20.98′
longitude W 88°34′.09′, thence to
latitude N 30°20.93′ longitude W
88°34.09′, thence to latitude N 30°20.89,
longitude W 88°34.09′, thence to
latitude N 30°20.83′ longitude W
88°34.09′, thence to latitude N 30°20.78′
longitude W 88°34.09′, thence to
latitude N 30°20.73′ longitude W
88°34.09′, thence to latitude N 30°20.68′
longitude W 88°34.09′, thence to
latitude N 30°20.63′ longitude W
88°34.09′, thence to latitude N 30°20.63′
longitude W 88°34.18′, thence to
latitude N 30°20.63′ longitude W
88°34.25′, thence to latitude N 30°20.63′
longitude W 88°34.33′, thence to
latitude N 30°20.63′ longitude W
88°34.40′, thence to latitude N 30°20.59′
longitude W 88°34.46′, thence to
latitude N 30°20.59′ longitude W
88°34.51′, thence to latitude N 30°20.59′
longitude W 88°34.57′, thence to
latitude N 30°20.59′ longitude W
88°34.63′, thence to latitude N 30°20.59′
longitude W 88°34.70′, thence to
latitude N 30°20.63′ longitude W
88°34.75′, thence to latitude N 30°20.63′
longitude W 88°34.82′, thence to
latitude N 30°20.63′ longitude W
88°34.87′, thence to latitude N 30°20.70′
longitude W 88°34.87′.
(b) The regulations. (1) All persons,
swimmers, vessels and other craft,
except those vessels under the
supervision or contract to local military
or Naval authority, vessels of the United
States Coast Guard, and local or state
law enforcement vessels, are prohibited
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
48717
from entering the restricted area without
permission from the Supervisor of
Shipbuilding, Conversion and Repair,
USN, Gulf Coast or his/her authorized
representative.
(2) The restricted area is in effect
twenty-four hours per day and seven
days a week (24/7).
(3) Should warranted access into the
restricted navigation area be needed, all
entities are to contact the Supervisor of
Shipbuilding, Conversion and Repair,
USN, Gulf Coast, Pascagoula,
Mississippi, or his/her authorized
representative on Marine
Communication Channel 16.
(c) Enforcement. The regulation in
this section shall be enforced by the
Supervisor of Shipbuilding, Conversion
and Repair, USN, Gulf Coast and/or
such agencies or persons as he/she may
designate.
Dated: August 11, 2014.
James R. Hannon,
Chief, Operations and Regulatory, Directorate
of Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 2014–19385 Filed 8–15–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
New Standards to Enhance Business
Reply Mail (BRM) Visibility
Postal Service.TM
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Postal Service proposes
to revise Mailing Standards of the
United States Postal Service, Domestic
Mail Manual (DMM®) to require the use
of an Intelligent Mail® package barcode
(IMpb) on Business Reply Mail® (BRM)
labels intended for use on cartons,
parcel-shaped items, or Priority Mail®
items of any shape.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
September 17, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver written
comments to the manager, product
Classification, U.S. Postal Service, 475
L’Enfant Plaza SW., Room 4446,
Washington, DC 20260–5015. You may
inspect and photocopy all written
comments at USPS® Headquarters
Library, 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW., 11th
Floor North, Washington, DC, by
appointment only, between 9 a.m. and
4 p.m., Monday through Friday by
calling 202–268–2906 in advance. Email
comments, containing the name and
address of the commenter, may be sent
to: ProductClassification@usps.gov,
with a subject line of ‘‘BRM Visibility.’’
Faxed comments are not accepted.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18AUP1.SGM
18AUP1
48718
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 159 / Monday, August 18, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Juliaann Hess at 202–268–7663, John F.
Rosato at 202–268–8597, or Suzanne
Newman at 202–695–0550.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Postal
Service continues to enhance its
operational capability to scan IMpb,
encoded with routing and tracking
information, via automated mail
processing equipment and Intelligent
Mail scanning devices and to provide
tracking information to the mailers. Full
implementation of the Postal Service’s
package strategy relies on the
availability of piece-level information
provided through the widespread use of
IMpb. Mailing standards recently added
to the DMM now require the use of
IMpb on all commercial parcels (except
parcels paid for using BRM service). The
Postal Service now advances its package
strategy by requiring a unique IMpb on
cartons, parcel-shaped items, or Priority
Mail pieces of any shape, sent using
BRM service.
Background: On December 18, 2013,
the Postal Service published a final rule
in the Federal Register (78 FR 76548)
announcing that an IMpb, unique to
each mailpiece, would be required on
all commercial parcels, effective January
26, 2014. At that time the Postal Service
also announced that it would be
eliminating the option for any mailpiece
meeting the physical characteristics of a
parcel (under DMM 201) to pay for
postage using Business Reply Mail®
(BRM).
In response to mailer feedback, on
June 5, 2014, the Postal Service
published a Federal Register notice (79
FR 32490) indefinitely deferring the
elimination of the option to use BRM to
pay postage for parcel-shaped items. At
that time the Postal Service also
indicated that it expected to issue
proposed rules requiring the use of an
IMpb on certain BRM cartons and
labels.
In accordance with its previously
expressed intent, the Postal Service now
issues proposed rules for requiring the
use of an IMpb on BRM cartons, parcels,
and Priority Mail items of any shape.
General IMpb Requirements:
Technical and general specifications for
IMpb use are provided in Publication
199, Intelligent Mail Package Barcode
(IMpb) Implementation Guide for:
Confirmation Services and Electronic
Verification System (eVS) Mailers, and
DMM 708.5.1.
BRM: In order to ensure that parcelshaped items sent using BRM service
comply with the same standards as all
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Aug 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
other commercial parcels, the Postal
Service would require a unique IMpb
on:
a. All BRM cartons.
b. All BRM labels distributed with the
intent of being placed on an item
meeting the physical characteristics of a
parcel in DMM 201.
c. All BRM labels distributed with the
intent of being placed on Priority Mail
items of any shape.
For the purposes of this requirement,
a BRM carton is defined as a parcelshaped mailpiece with a BRM label
either printed directly on the mailpiece
or affixed by the end user prior to
mailing. BRM permit holders would not
be required to submit shipping
manifests to support these mailpieces.
BRM labels would be required to use a
unique Mailer ID (MID) for parcelshaped BRM pieces and a concatenated
IMpb construct that includes the ZIP+4®
routing code. The barcodes must be
unique for 180 days. BRM cartons and
parcels shall use IMpb service type
codes for Merchandise Return Service
for Priority Mail or First-Class Mail®,
based on the product shipped. The
Postal Service will provide an exception
process—for mailers of small BRM
cartons and parcels lacking sufficient
label space to apply an IMpb barcode
meeting the 3⁄4-inch height
requirement—to submit barcodes of at
least 1⁄2-inch in height for USPS® testing
and approval. This exception process
will be administered by the National
Customer Service Center (NCSC), as part
of the normal barcode approval process.
At this time, no other changes would be
made to the BRM requirements in DMM
505.1 applicable to all other mail
shapes.
Noncompliant Mailpieces: The Postal
Service would assess a per-piece price
adjustment on all noncompliant pieces.
The Postal Service would begin
enforcement of the per piece price
adjustment for Priority Mail pieces once
final rules are issued. The proposed
effective date for the per-piece
adjustment on First-Class Mail pieces
would be predicated on the Postal
Service filing a notice with, and
receiving approval from, the Postal
Regulatory Commission.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111
Administrative practice and
procedure, Postal Service.
Although we are exempt from the
notice and comment requirements of the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553(b), (c)) regarding proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
rulemaking by 39 U.S.C. 410(a), we
invite public comments on the
following proposed revisions to Mailing
Standards of the United States Postal
Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM),
incorporated by reference in the Code of
Federal Regulations. See 39 CFR 111.1.
Accordingly, 39 CFR part 111 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 111—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR
part 111 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 13 U.S.C. 301–
307; 18 U.S.C. 1692–1737; 39 U.S.C. 101,
401, 403, 404, 414, 416, 3001–3011, 3201–
3219, 3403–3406, 3621, 3622, 3626, 3632,
3633, and 5001.
2. Revise the following sections of
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM), as follows:
■
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM)
*
*
505
Return Services
1.0
Business Reply Mail (BRM)
*
*
1.4
General Information
1.4.1
*
*
*
*
*
*
Description
[Insert a new fourth sentence in 1.4.1
to read as follows:]
* * * All BRM labels intended for
use on cartons, mailpieces meeting the
physical characteristics of a parcel in
DMM 201, or a Priority Mail item of any
shape, must meet the standards under
1.7.10. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
1.7
*
Mailpiece Characteristics
*
*
*
*
[Insert new 1.7.10 to read as follows:]
1.7.10
Labels for Parcels
BRM labels intended for use on
cartons, mailpieces meeting the physical
standards of a parcel under DMM 201,
or a Priority Mail item of any shape,
must also bear an IMpb prepared under
708.5.0 and meet the technical
standards in the Parcel Labeling Guide
available on RIBBS.
*
*
*
*
*
1.8
1.8.1
Format Elements
General
[Revise the text of the first and second
sentences of 1.8.1 to read as follows:]
E:\FR\FM\18AUP1.SGM
18AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 159 / Monday, August 18, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Except for BRM labels for parcels as
provided under 1.7.10, all pieces of
BRM are subject to these format
elements. For all other BRM pieces, an
Intelligent Mail barcode (IMb) is not
required, except for QBRM prices; if an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Aug 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
IMb is used, it must be printed and
placed as provided under 1.9 and as
shown in Exhibit 1.8.1. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
We will publish an appropriate
amendment to 39 CFR part 111 to reflect
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
48719
these changes if our proposal is
adopted.
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2014–19433 Filed 8–15–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
E:\FR\FM\18AUP1.SGM
18AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 159 (Monday, August 18, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48717-48719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19433]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
New Standards to Enhance Business Reply Mail (BRM) Visibility
AGENCY: Postal Service.TM
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Postal Service proposes to revise Mailing Standards of the
United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM[supreg]) to
require the use of an Intelligent Mail[supreg] package barcode (IMpb)
on Business Reply Mail[supreg] (BRM) labels intended for use on
cartons, parcel-shaped items, or Priority Mail[supreg] items of any
shape.
DATES: Submit comments on or before September 17, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver written comments to the manager, product
Classification, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Room 4446,
Washington, DC 20260-5015. You may inspect and photocopy all written
comments at USPS[supreg] Headquarters Library, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW.,
11th Floor North, Washington, DC, by appointment only, between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday by calling 202-268-2906 in advance.
Email comments, containing the name and address of the commenter, may
be sent to: ProductClassification@usps.gov, with a subject line of
``BRM Visibility.'' Faxed comments are not accepted.
[[Page 48718]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juliaann Hess at 202-268-7663, John F.
Rosato at 202-268-8597, or Suzanne Newman at 202-695-0550.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Postal Service continues to enhance its
operational capability to scan IMpb, encoded with routing and tracking
information, via automated mail processing equipment and Intelligent
Mail scanning devices and to provide tracking information to the
mailers. Full implementation of the Postal Service's package strategy
relies on the availability of piece-level information provided through
the widespread use of IMpb. Mailing standards recently added to the DMM
now require the use of IMpb on all commercial parcels (except parcels
paid for using BRM service). The Postal Service now advances its
package strategy by requiring a unique IMpb on cartons, parcel-shaped
items, or Priority Mail pieces of any shape, sent using BRM service.
Background: On December 18, 2013, the Postal Service published a
final rule in the Federal Register (78 FR 76548) announcing that an
IMpb, unique to each mailpiece, would be required on all commercial
parcels, effective January 26, 2014. At that time the Postal Service
also announced that it would be eliminating the option for any
mailpiece meeting the physical characteristics of a parcel (under DMM
201) to pay for postage using Business Reply Mail[supreg] (BRM).
In response to mailer feedback, on June 5, 2014, the Postal Service
published a Federal Register notice (79 FR 32490) indefinitely
deferring the elimination of the option to use BRM to pay postage for
parcel-shaped items. At that time the Postal Service also indicated
that it expected to issue proposed rules requiring the use of an IMpb
on certain BRM cartons and labels.
In accordance with its previously expressed intent, the Postal
Service now issues proposed rules for requiring the use of an IMpb on
BRM cartons, parcels, and Priority Mail items of any shape.
General IMpb Requirements: Technical and general specifications for
IMpb use are provided in Publication 199, Intelligent Mail Package
Barcode (IMpb) Implementation Guide for: Confirmation Services and
Electronic Verification System (eVS) Mailers, and DMM 708.5.1.
BRM: In order to ensure that parcel-shaped items sent using BRM
service comply with the same standards as all other commercial parcels,
the Postal Service would require a unique IMpb on:
a. All BRM cartons.
b. All BRM labels distributed with the intent of being placed on an
item meeting the physical characteristics of a parcel in DMM 201.
c. All BRM labels distributed with the intent of being placed on
Priority Mail items of any shape.
For the purposes of this requirement, a BRM carton is defined as a
parcel-shaped mailpiece with a BRM label either printed directly on the
mailpiece or affixed by the end user prior to mailing. BRM permit
holders would not be required to submit shipping manifests to support
these mailpieces. BRM labels would be required to use a unique Mailer
ID (MID) for parcel-shaped BRM pieces and a concatenated IMpb construct
that includes the ZIP+4[supreg] routing code. The barcodes must be
unique for 180 days. BRM cartons and parcels shall use IMpb service
type codes for Merchandise Return Service for Priority Mail or First-
Class Mail[supreg], based on the product shipped. The Postal Service
will provide an exception process--for mailers of small BRM cartons and
parcels lacking sufficient label space to apply an IMpb barcode meeting
the \3/4\-inch height requirement--to submit barcodes of at least \1/
2\-inch in height for USPS[supreg] testing and approval. This exception
process will be administered by the National Customer Service Center
(NCSC), as part of the normal barcode approval process. At this time,
no other changes would be made to the BRM requirements in DMM 505.1
applicable to all other mail shapes.
Noncompliant Mailpieces: The Postal Service would assess a per-
piece price adjustment on all noncompliant pieces. The Postal Service
would begin enforcement of the per piece price adjustment for Priority
Mail pieces once final rules are issued. The proposed effective date
for the per-piece adjustment on First-Class Mail pieces would be
predicated on the Postal Service filing a notice with, and receiving
approval from, the Postal Regulatory Commission.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111
Administrative practice and procedure, Postal Service.
Although we are exempt from the notice and comment requirements of
the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b), (c)) regarding
proposed rulemaking by 39 U.S.C. 410(a), we invite public comments on
the following proposed revisions to Mailing Standards of the United
States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM), incorporated by
reference in the Code of Federal Regulations. See 39 CFR 111.1.
Accordingly, 39 CFR part 111 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 111--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 111 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 13 U.S.C. 301-307; 18 U.S.C. 1692-
1737; 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 414, 416, 3001-3011, 3201-3219,
3403-3406, 3621, 3622, 3626, 3632, 3633, and 5001.
0
2. Revise the following sections of Mailing Standards of the United
States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM), as follows:
Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail
Manual (DMM)
* * * * *
505 Return Services
1.0 Business Reply Mail (BRM)
* * * * *
1.4 General Information
1.4.1 Description
[Insert a new fourth sentence in 1.4.1 to read as follows:]
* * * All BRM labels intended for use on cartons, mailpieces
meeting the physical characteristics of a parcel in DMM 201, or a
Priority Mail item of any shape, must meet the standards under 1.7.10.
* * *
* * * * *
1.7 Mailpiece Characteristics
* * * * *
[Insert new 1.7.10 to read as follows:]
1.7.10 Labels for Parcels
BRM labels intended for use on cartons, mailpieces meeting the
physical standards of a parcel under DMM 201, or a Priority Mail item
of any shape, must also bear an IMpb prepared under 708.5.0 and meet
the technical standards in the Parcel Labeling Guide available on
RIBBS.
* * * * *
1.8 Format Elements
1.8.1 General
[Revise the text of the first and second sentences of 1.8.1 to read
as follows:]
[[Page 48719]]
Except for BRM labels for parcels as provided under 1.7.10, all
pieces of BRM are subject to these format elements. For all other BRM
pieces, an Intelligent Mail barcode (IMb) is not required, except for
QBRM prices; if an IMb is used, it must be printed and placed as
provided under 1.9 and as shown in Exhibit 1.8.1. * * *
* * * * *
We will publish an appropriate amendment to 39 CFR part 111 to
reflect these changes if our proposal is adopted.
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2014-19433 Filed 8-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P