Pilot Program for Qualification of Medical Device Development Tools, 48170-48172 [2014-19360]
Download as PDF
48170
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 2014 / Notices
the agency’s functions; (2) the accuracy
of the estimated burden; (3) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(4) the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology to minimize the information
collection burden.
DATES: Comments on the collection(s) of
information must be received by the
OMB desk officer by September 15,
2014.
When commenting on the
proposed information collections,
please reference the document identifier
or OMB control number. To be assured
consideration, comments and
recommendations must be received by
the OMB desk officer via one of the
following transmissions:
OMB, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attention: CMS Desk
Officer, Fax Number: (202) 395–5806 or
Email: OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov .
To obtain copies of a supporting
statement and any related forms for the
proposed collection(s) summarized in
this notice, you may make your request
using one of following:
1. Access CMS’ Web site address at
https://www.cms.hhs.gov/
PaperworkReductionActof1995.
2. Email your request, including your
address, phone number, OMB number,
and CMS document identifier, to
Paperwork@cms.hhs.gov.
3. Call the Reports Clearance Office at
(410) 786–1326.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Reports Clearance Office at (410) 786–
1326.
ADDRESSES:
Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), federal agencies
must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each
collection of information they conduct
or sponsor. The term ‘‘collection of
information’’ is defined in 44 U.S.C.
3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and
includes agency requests or
requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records, or provide
information to a third party. Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)) requires federal agencies
to publish a 30-day notice in the
Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension or
reinstatement of an existing collection
of information, before submitting the
collection to OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, CMS is
publishing this notice that summarizes
the following proposed collection(s) of
information for public comment:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
1. Type of Information Collection
Request: Reinstatement of a previously
approved collection; Title of
Information Collection: Hospital
Conditions of Participation and
Supporting Regulations; Use: The
information collection requirements
described in this information collection
request are needed to implement the
Medicare and Medicaid conditions of
participation (CoP) for 4,890 accredited
and non-accredited hospitals and an
additional 101 critical access hospitals
(CAHs) that have distinct part
psychiatric or rehabilitation units
(DPUs). CAHs that have DPUs must
comply with all of the hospital CoPs on
these units. This package reflects the
paperwork burden for a total of 4,991
(that is, 4,890 hospitals and 101 CAHs
which include 81 CAHs that have
psychiatric DPUs and 20 CAHs that
have rehabilitation DPUs). The
information collection requirements for
the remaining 1,183 CAHs have been
reported in a separate package under
CMS–10239.
The CoPs and accompanying
requirements specified in the
supporting regulations are used by our
surveyors as a basis for determining
whether a hospital qualifies for a
provider agreement under Medicare and
Medicaid. CMS and the health care
industry believe that the availability to
the facility of the type of records and
general content of records, which the
supporting regulations specify, is
standard medical practice and is
necessary in order to ensure the wellbeing and safety of patients and
professional treatment accountability.
Subsequent to publication of the 60-day
Federal Register notice (January 31,
2014; 79 FR 5417), the burden has been
recalculated. Form Number: CMS–R–48
(OMB control number: 0938–0328);
Frequency: Yearly; Affected Public:
Private sector (business or other forprofits); Number of Respondents: 4,991;
Total Annual Responses: 17,279,717;
Total Annual Hours: 14,424,655. (For
policy questions regarding this
collection contact Scott Cooper at 410–
786–9465.)
Dated: August 11, 2014.
Martique Jones,
Director, Regulations Development Group,
Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014–19260 Filed 8–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–D–1279]
Pilot Program for Qualification of
Medical Device Development Tools
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is soliciting
proposals to participate in a pilot
program for Medical Device
Development Tools (MDDT)
qualification (MDDT Pilot Program).
Under the MDDT Pilot Program, FDA
intends to work together with
developers of tools that meet the criteria
for the proposed program, to determine
whether certain tools may be developed
and qualified in order to facilitate more
predictable, efficient, and transparent
regulatory evaluation when MDDTs are
used to generate valid scientific
evidence for medical device premarket
applications.
DATES: FDA will begin accepting
nominations for participation in the
voluntary MDDT Pilot Program
September 15, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan
Adams-White, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3650, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–5421,
Joannie.Adams-White@fda.hhs.gov; or
Kathryn O’Callaghan, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3614, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–6349,
Kathryn.ocallaghan@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of November
14, 2013 (78 FR 68459), the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) announced
the availability of the draft guidance
entitled ‘‘Medical Device Development
Tools’’ (https://www.fda.gov/
medicaldevices/
deviceregulationandguidance/
guidancedocuments/ucm374427.htm)
(MDDT draft guidance). When finalized,
the draft guidance will represent FDA’s
current thinking on qualification of
MDDTs for use in device development
and evaluation. The proposed MDDT
qualification process is intended to
support the development of MDDTs—
tools that manufacturers and FDA use to
assess and measure the performance,
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 2014 / Notices
safety, and effectiveness of medical
devices. MDDT tools qualified by FDA
can then be relied upon by the medical
device industry in support of their
device submissions to the Agency,
potentially reducing time and other
resources needed to develop new
products. This proposed voluntary
qualification process is intended to
enable submitters of MDDT proposals
chosen for this pilot program to work
closely with FDA to determine the
amount and type of evidence and other
information needed to support
qualification for a specific tool and
context of use.
The anticipated benefits of the
proposed MDDT qualification process
include facilitating timely development
of tools that manufacturers and FDA use
to assess and measure the performance,
safety, and effectiveness of medical
devices. FDA expects that
manufacturers can better rely on MDDTs
that have been FDA reviewed and
accepted (qualified), and made available
through this voluntary program, which
supports innovative medical device
development and promotes regulatory
science. The proposed MDDT
qualification process supports the FDA’s
plan to advance regulatory science—the
science of developing new tools,
methods and approaches to assess the
safety, effectiveness, performance, and
quality of medical devices.
Advancements in regulatory science
help to bridge the gap between research
and discovery of medical devices and
the actual delivery of the device to
patients. The proposed qualification
process also supports FDA’s strategic
priority of strengthening the clinical
trial enterprise by potentially increasing
the efficiency of the clinical studies.
Finally, this proposed qualification
process supports FDA’s strategic
priority actions to strike the right
balance between premarket and
postmarket data collection, leading to
earlier access to beneficial innovative
technologies for patients in the United
States. For example, an MDDT qualified
for use as an intermediate or surrogate
endpoint could facilitate more efficient
development and evaluation of devices,
especially for those intended to address
unmet medical needs.
FDA is proposing a new voluntary
MDDT Pilot Program. Information
learned and experiences gained from the
MDDT Pilot Program will help inform
the final guidance document and
processes. FDA plans to prioritize
proposals based on public health need
or potential to impact multiple device
development programs. Additionally,
for the purposes of the pilot, proposals
are expected to be prioritized based on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
feasibility, timeline, and FDA resources.
See section II.B. Appropriate
Candidates, for details.
II. MDDT Pilot Program
FDA has developed a pilot program
for interested tool developers. This
document outlines: (1) The guiding
principles underlying the MDDT Pilot
Program, (2) appropriate candidates for
the MDDT Pilot Program, and (3) the
procedures FDA intends to follow in the
MDDT Pilot Program.
A. Guiding Principles
The following basic principles
underlie the MDDT Pilot Program
described in this document. FDA
intends that these principles create a
common understanding between the
submitter and FDA about the goals and
parameters of the MDDT Pilot Program:
1. For qualified MDDTs, FDA intends
to make public the context of use,
summary of evidence, and basis of the
qualification determination (analogous
to summaries of approved devices). FDA
will keep proprietary information
confidential. Submitters must consent to
make MDDTs accessible to the public
for use (e.g. through sales, open source,
etc.), and not restrict to certain private
entities, such as a single manufacturer.
2. FDA and the MDDT Pilot Program
places no requirements on licensing/
cost/degree of access to intellectual
property associated with a tool, nor does
it consider restrictions related to patent
claims. An MDDT submitter may
include and protect proprietary methods
as long as access to the tool is not
restricted to certain private entities.
3. Participating in this MDDT Pilot
Program does not guarantee
qualification of an MDDT, nor is a
submitter precluded from withdrawing
from the MDDT Pilot Program.
4. Due to FDA resource constraints,
FDA intends to limit the MDDT Pilot
Program to no more than 15 candidates.
B. Appropriate Candidates
The process for MDDT qualification
can be initiated in one of three ways: (1)
A tool developer chooses to pursue
qualification for his or her tool to allow
for use across multiple device
development programs; (2) need and
interest in an area is determined by
individual or consortia of stakeholders
(may include academia, industry,
medical societies); or (3) FDA identifies
an area of need and calls for
development of tools in a specific area.
Appropriate candidates for the MDDT
Pilot Program are:
1. Tools which fit into one of the
following categories:
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48171
• Clinical Outcome Assessments such
as patient-reported outcomes or clinical
outcomes based on clearly defined
subjective clinical decision making as a
measure of treatment benefit;
• Biomarker Tests such as in vitro
laboratory tests or medical imaging
methods, or other objective
measurement methods used to detect or
measure a biomarker; or
• Nonclinical Assessment Models
such as in vitro (‘‘bench’’) models,
animal models, or computer models to
measure a parameter of interest or to
substitute for another generally accepted
test or instrument.
2. Tools which address the following
factors:
• Public health need met by one or
more of the following:
Æ Context of use includes lifethreatening or serious chronic diseases/
conditions, or both;
Æ No/poor alternatives or unmet
scientific need;
Æ Innovative technology with no
established paradigm for regulatory
assessment; or
Æ Gain major efficiencies in device
development and evaluation time.
• Scope of impact:
Æ Potential to impact multiple device
development programs; or
Æ Potential to impact multiple device
sponsors.
3. FDA intends to prioritize
candidates for the pilot program based
on the following factors:
• Tool readiness: Does the tool exist
in prototype or final form?
• Acceptance of proposed context of
use: Does available information support
acceptance of the tool principle/method
of measurement for the proposed
context of use, or for any use?
• Timeline: What is the expected
timeline to submission of a qualification
package?
• Potential for public health impact:
Does the tool address an unmet public
health need or significantly reduce
product development timelines, or
both?
FDA encourages any interested
developers who believe their tool is an
appropriate candidate for the MDDT
Pilot Program to contact FDA before
initiating the procedures referenced
under the following section titled
‘‘Procedures.’’
C. Procedures
FDA has developed the following
procedures to ensure adequate
information to assess a candidate’s
suitability for the MDDT Pilot Program
is provided to FDA without creating a
burdensome new application process:
1. Nomination. The submitter may
nominate his or her tool for
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
48172
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 2014 / Notices
participation in the MDDT Pilot
Program by submitting a proposal to
MDDT@fda.hhs.gov. FDA intends to
acknowledge receipt of nominations via
email.
A submitter’s proposal for the MDDT
Pilot Program should include the
following information to assist FDA in
processing and responding to
nominations:
• A cover letter and a brief statement
explaining why the tool is an
appropriate candidate for the MDDT
Pilot Program as described under
section II., B. Appropriate Candidates;
and
• A description of the tool, the
proposed context of use, a synopsis of
the available evidence and plans for
additional evidence gathering, and an
assessment of the advantages or
disadvantages related to the capabilities
and limitations of the tool for the
proposed context of use.
2. Submitter Notification. FDA
intends to notify the submitter via email
whether or not the tool is an appropriate
candidate for the MDDT Pilot Program
within approximately 30 days of receipt
of the complete information.
3. Pre-qualification Plan. If the
nominee is deemed an appropriate
candidate, the submitter will be notified
by FDA and invited to submit a prequalification plan within approximately
30 days of being notified by the FDA
that its nominee was accepted. One way
to present the pre-qualification plan is
included in Appendix 1 of the MDDT
draft guidance. FDA recommends the
pre-qualification and qualification plans
be submitted in accordance with FDA
guidance entitled ‘‘Medical Devices:
Pre-Submission Program and Meetings
with FDA Staff’’ (www.fda.gov/
downloads/medicaldevices/
deviceregulationandguidance/
guidancedocuments/ucm311176.pdf) as
the process for the MDDT pilot program
is expected to be modeled after the PreSubmission Program.
4. Pre-qualification Meeting. FDA
intends to meet with the submitter,
either in person or by phone, in
accordance with the process outlined in
the FDA guidance on ‘‘Medical Devices:
Pre-Submission Programs and Meetings
With FDA Staff.’’ The qualification
review team (which may include FDA
as well as external expertise, where
appropriate) will interact with the
submitter to identify the amount and
type of data or information needed for
qualification of the tool for the proposed
context of use.
5. FDA Review. Under the MDDT Pilot
Program, the Agency intends to work
interactively with submitters as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:31 Aug 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
• Where appropriate, FDA may seek
input from external individuals or
groups for specific expertise, consistent
with all applicable statutory and
regulatory requirements, including
those respecting confidentiality.
• During the process for MDDT
qualification, FDA intends to interact
with submitters to efficiently determine
the amount and type of information
needed to support qualification for a
specific tool and context of use, and as
needed for clarification or to request
additional information.
• When the submitter has the data
and information necessary for a
complete qualification package, they
may submit it to justify qualification of
the tool for the proposed context of use.
FDA intends to hold a qualification
meeting or teleconference to facilitate
discussion once the package has been
reviewed.
D. Duration of the MDDT Pilot Program
FDA intends to accept requests for
participation in the MDDT Pilot
Program until such time that the MDDT
draft guidance is finalized. FDA may
decide to terminate the MDDT Pilot
Program at any time or extend the
MDDT Pilot Program. The decision to
terminate or extend the MDDT Pilot
Program will be announced in the
Federal Register. FDA may also decide
to modify the MDDT Pilot Program
while it is in effect. Any significant
modifications will also be announced in
the Federal Register.
E. Evaluation
FDA intends to use the experience
gained from the MDDT Pilot Program to
inform the final version of the MDDT
guidance and processes.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This notice contains information
collection that is subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 812 have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0078
(Investigative Device Exemption); the
collections of information in 21 CFR
part 814 have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0231
(Premarket Approval); the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 807, subpart
E have been approved under OMB
control number 0910–0120 (Premarket
Notification); and the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 809 have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0485.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: August 11, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–19360 Filed 8–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Diabetes and
Digestive and Kidney Diseases; Notice
of Closed Meetings
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meetings.
The meetings will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: National Institute of
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Special Emphasis Panel; Small Grants to
Promote Diversity.
Date: September 16, 2014.
Time: 9 a.m. to 2 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, Two
Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy
Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone
Conference Call).
Contact Person: Elena Sanovich, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch,
DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes Of Health,
Room 750, 6707 Democracy Boulevard,
Bethesda, MD 20892–2542, 301–594–8886,
sanoviche@mail.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: National Institute of
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Special Emphasis Panel; PAR–13–266–
NIDDK Program Project (P01)–ANCA
Glomerulonephritis.
Date: October 1, 2014.
Time: 11 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, Two
Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy
Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone
Conference Call).
Contact Person: Najma Begum, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch,
DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes Of Health,
Room 749, 6707 Democracy Boulevard,
Bethesda, MD 20892–5452, (301) 594–8894,
begumn@niddk.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: National Institute of
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 158 (Friday, August 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48170-48172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19360]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-D-1279]
Pilot Program for Qualification of Medical Device Development
Tools
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is soliciting proposals
to participate in a pilot program for Medical Device Development Tools
(MDDT) qualification (MDDT Pilot Program). Under the MDDT Pilot
Program, FDA intends to work together with developers of tools that
meet the criteria for the proposed program, to determine whether
certain tools may be developed and qualified in order to facilitate
more predictable, efficient, and transparent regulatory evaluation when
MDDTs are used to generate valid scientific evidence for medical device
premarket applications.
DATES: FDA will begin accepting nominations for participation in the
voluntary MDDT Pilot Program September 15, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan Adams-White, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3650, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-5421, Joannie.Adams-White@fda.hhs.gov; or Kathryn O'Callaghan,
Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 3614, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-6349, Kathryn.ocallaghan@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of November 14, 2013 (78 FR 68459), the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the availability of the
draft guidance entitled ``Medical Device Development Tools'' (https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/ucm374427.htm) (MDDT draft guidance). When finalized,
the draft guidance will represent FDA's current thinking on
qualification of MDDTs for use in device development and evaluation.
The proposed MDDT qualification process is intended to support the
development of MDDTs--tools that manufacturers and FDA use to assess
and measure the performance,
[[Page 48171]]
safety, and effectiveness of medical devices. MDDT tools qualified by
FDA can then be relied upon by the medical device industry in support
of their device submissions to the Agency, potentially reducing time
and other resources needed to develop new products. This proposed
voluntary qualification process is intended to enable submitters of
MDDT proposals chosen for this pilot program to work closely with FDA
to determine the amount and type of evidence and other information
needed to support qualification for a specific tool and context of use.
The anticipated benefits of the proposed MDDT qualification process
include facilitating timely development of tools that manufacturers and
FDA use to assess and measure the performance, safety, and
effectiveness of medical devices. FDA expects that manufacturers can
better rely on MDDTs that have been FDA reviewed and accepted
(qualified), and made available through this voluntary program, which
supports innovative medical device development and promotes regulatory
science. The proposed MDDT qualification process supports the FDA's
plan to advance regulatory science--the science of developing new
tools, methods and approaches to assess the safety, effectiveness,
performance, and quality of medical devices. Advancements in regulatory
science help to bridge the gap between research and discovery of
medical devices and the actual delivery of the device to patients. The
proposed qualification process also supports FDA's strategic priority
of strengthening the clinical trial enterprise by potentially
increasing the efficiency of the clinical studies. Finally, this
proposed qualification process supports FDA's strategic priority
actions to strike the right balance between premarket and postmarket
data collection, leading to earlier access to beneficial innovative
technologies for patients in the United States. For example, an MDDT
qualified for use as an intermediate or surrogate endpoint could
facilitate more efficient development and evaluation of devices,
especially for those intended to address unmet medical needs.
FDA is proposing a new voluntary MDDT Pilot Program. Information
learned and experiences gained from the MDDT Pilot Program will help
inform the final guidance document and processes. FDA plans to
prioritize proposals based on public health need or potential to impact
multiple device development programs. Additionally, for the purposes of
the pilot, proposals are expected to be prioritized based on
feasibility, timeline, and FDA resources. See section II.B. Appropriate
Candidates, for details.
II. MDDT Pilot Program
FDA has developed a pilot program for interested tool developers.
This document outlines: (1) The guiding principles underlying the MDDT
Pilot Program, (2) appropriate candidates for the MDDT Pilot Program,
and (3) the procedures FDA intends to follow in the MDDT Pilot Program.
A. Guiding Principles
The following basic principles underlie the MDDT Pilot Program
described in this document. FDA intends that these principles create a
common understanding between the submitter and FDA about the goals and
parameters of the MDDT Pilot Program:
1. For qualified MDDTs, FDA intends to make public the context of
use, summary of evidence, and basis of the qualification determination
(analogous to summaries of approved devices). FDA will keep proprietary
information confidential. Submitters must consent to make MDDTs
accessible to the public for use (e.g. through sales, open source,
etc.), and not restrict to certain private entities, such as a single
manufacturer.
2. FDA and the MDDT Pilot Program places no requirements on
licensing/cost/degree of access to intellectual property associated
with a tool, nor does it consider restrictions related to patent
claims. An MDDT submitter may include and protect proprietary methods
as long as access to the tool is not restricted to certain private
entities.
3. Participating in this MDDT Pilot Program does not guarantee
qualification of an MDDT, nor is a submitter precluded from withdrawing
from the MDDT Pilot Program.
4. Due to FDA resource constraints, FDA intends to limit the MDDT
Pilot Program to no more than 15 candidates.
B. Appropriate Candidates
The process for MDDT qualification can be initiated in one of three
ways: (1) A tool developer chooses to pursue qualification for his or
her tool to allow for use across multiple device development programs;
(2) need and interest in an area is determined by individual or
consortia of stakeholders (may include academia, industry, medical
societies); or (3) FDA identifies an area of need and calls for
development of tools in a specific area.
Appropriate candidates for the MDDT Pilot Program are:
1. Tools which fit into one of the following categories:
Clinical Outcome Assessments such as patient-reported
outcomes or clinical outcomes based on clearly defined subjective
clinical decision making as a measure of treatment benefit;
Biomarker Tests such as in vitro laboratory tests or
medical imaging methods, or other objective measurement methods used to
detect or measure a biomarker; or
Nonclinical Assessment Models such as in vitro (``bench'')
models, animal models, or computer models to measure a parameter of
interest or to substitute for another generally accepted test or
instrument.
2. Tools which address the following factors:
Public health need met by one or more of the following:
[cir] Context of use includes life-threatening or serious chronic
diseases/conditions, or both;
[cir] No/poor alternatives or unmet scientific need;
[cir] Innovative technology with no established paradigm for
regulatory assessment; or
[cir] Gain major efficiencies in device development and evaluation
time.
Scope of impact:
[cir] Potential to impact multiple device development programs; or
[cir] Potential to impact multiple device sponsors.
3. FDA intends to prioritize candidates for the pilot program based
on the following factors:
Tool readiness: Does the tool exist in prototype or final
form?
Acceptance of proposed context of use: Does available
information support acceptance of the tool principle/method of
measurement for the proposed context of use, or for any use?
Timeline: What is the expected timeline to submission of a
qualification package?
Potential for public health impact: Does the tool address
an unmet public health need or significantly reduce product development
timelines, or both?
FDA encourages any interested developers who believe their tool is
an appropriate candidate for the MDDT Pilot Program to contact FDA
before initiating the procedures referenced under the following section
titled ``Procedures.''
C. Procedures
FDA has developed the following procedures to ensure adequate
information to assess a candidate's suitability for the MDDT Pilot
Program is provided to FDA without creating a burdensome new
application process:
1. Nomination. The submitter may nominate his or her tool for
[[Page 48172]]
participation in the MDDT Pilot Program by submitting a proposal to
MDDT@fda.hhs.gov. FDA intends to acknowledge receipt of nominations via
email.
A submitter's proposal for the MDDT Pilot Program should include
the following information to assist FDA in processing and responding to
nominations:
A cover letter and a brief statement explaining why the
tool is an appropriate candidate for the MDDT Pilot Program as
described under section II., B. Appropriate Candidates; and
A description of the tool, the proposed context of use, a
synopsis of the available evidence and plans for additional evidence
gathering, and an assessment of the advantages or disadvantages related
to the capabilities and limitations of the tool for the proposed
context of use.
2. Submitter Notification. FDA intends to notify the submitter via
email whether or not the tool is an appropriate candidate for the MDDT
Pilot Program within approximately 30 days of receipt of the complete
information.
3. Pre-qualification Plan. If the nominee is deemed an appropriate
candidate, the submitter will be notified by FDA and invited to submit
a pre-qualification plan within approximately 30 days of being notified
by the FDA that its nominee was accepted. One way to present the pre-
qualification plan is included in Appendix 1 of the MDDT draft
guidance. FDA recommends the pre-qualification and qualification plans
be submitted in accordance with FDA guidance entitled ``Medical
Devices: Pre-Submission Program and Meetings with FDA Staff''
(www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/ucm311176.pdf) as the process for the MDDT pilot
program is expected to be modeled after the Pre-Submission Program.
4. Pre-qualification Meeting. FDA intends to meet with the
submitter, either in person or by phone, in accordance with the process
outlined in the FDA guidance on ``Medical Devices: Pre-Submission
Programs and Meetings With FDA Staff.'' The qualification review team
(which may include FDA as well as external expertise, where
appropriate) will interact with the submitter to identify the amount
and type of data or information needed for qualification of the tool
for the proposed context of use.
5. FDA Review. Under the MDDT Pilot Program, the Agency intends to
work interactively with submitters as follows:
Where appropriate, FDA may seek input from external
individuals or groups for specific expertise, consistent with all
applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, including those
respecting confidentiality.
During the process for MDDT qualification, FDA intends to
interact with submitters to efficiently determine the amount and type
of information needed to support qualification for a specific tool and
context of use, and as needed for clarification or to request
additional information.
When the submitter has the data and information necessary
for a complete qualification package, they may submit it to justify
qualification of the tool for the proposed context of use. FDA intends
to hold a qualification meeting or teleconference to facilitate
discussion once the package has been reviewed.
D. Duration of the MDDT Pilot Program
FDA intends to accept requests for participation in the MDDT Pilot
Program until such time that the MDDT draft guidance is finalized. FDA
may decide to terminate the MDDT Pilot Program at any time or extend
the MDDT Pilot Program. The decision to terminate or extend the MDDT
Pilot Program will be announced in the Federal Register. FDA may also
decide to modify the MDDT Pilot Program while it is in effect. Any
significant modifications will also be announced in the Federal
Register.
E. Evaluation
FDA intends to use the experience gained from the MDDT Pilot
Program to inform the final version of the MDDT guidance and processes.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This notice contains information collection that is subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of
information in 21 CFR part 812 have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0078 (Investigative Device Exemption); the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 814 have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0231 (Premarket Approval); the collections of information
in 21 CFR part 807, subpart E have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0120 (Premarket Notification); and the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 809 have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0485.
Dated: August 11, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-19360 Filed 8-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P