Special Local Regulations for Marine Events, Patuxent River; Solomons, MD, 47040-47043 [2014-19072]
Download as PDF
47040
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 155 / Tuesday, August 12, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Table of Acronyms
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2014–0636]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events, Patuxent River; Solomons, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard proposes to
temporarily change the enforcement
periods of special local regulations for a
recurring marine event in the Fifth
Coast Guard District. These regulations
apply to the Chesapeake Challenge
power boat race, a recurring marine
event, and would be effective from
October 4, 2014, to October 5, 2014.
Special local regulations are necessary
to provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the event. This
action is intended to restrict vessel
traffic in a portion of the Patuxent River
at Solomons, MD during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before September 11, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Ronald Houck, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Baltimore, MD; telephone
410–576–2674, email Ronald.L.Houck@
uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
(202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Aug 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2014–0636] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2014–0636) in
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one, using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
This marine event is regulated at 33
CFR 100.501. The dates of the event as
published are September 2nd, 3rd or 4th
(Friday, Saturday and Sunday).
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis and authorities for this
rulemaking establishing a special local
regulation are found in 33 U.S.C. 1233,
which authorize the Coast Guard to
establish and define special local
regulations. The Captain of the Port
Baltimore is establishing a special local
regulation for the waters of the Patuxent
River, near Solomons, MD to protect
event participants, spectators and
transiting vessels. Entry into this area is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Baltimore or designated representative.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
Marine events are frequently held on
the navigable waters within the
boundary of the Fifth Coast Guard
District. The activities that typically
comprise marine events include but are
not limited to sailing regattas, power
boat races, swim races and holiday
parades. The regulation listing annual
marine events within the Fifth Coast
Guard District and their regulated dates
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
12AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 155 / Tuesday, August 12, 2014 / Proposed Rules
is 33 CFR 100.501. The Table to
§ 100.501 identifies marine events by
Captain of the Port zone. For a
description of the geographical area of
each Coast Guard Sector—Captain of the
Port Zone, please see 33 CFR 3.25.
Event planners notified the Coast
Guard of date changes for the
‘‘Chesapeake Challenge’’ marine event
that is listed at 33 CFR 100.501, Table
to § 100.501. This regulation
temporarily changes the enforcement
periods for this marine event for 2014
only. The enforcement dates for 2014
are October 4, 2014, and October 5,
2014.
The annual ‘‘Chesapeake Challenge,’’
marine event is sponsored by the
Chesapeake Bay Powerboat Association;
and takes place on the waters of the
Patuxent River at Solomons, MD. The
regulation at 33 CFR 100.501 is effective
annually for the Chesapeake Challenge
marine event. The event consists of
power boat racing on the waters of the
Patuxent River at Solomons, MD.
Participants operate on a marked course
with sponsor-provided support craft.
Therefore, to ensure the safety of
participants and support vessels, 33
CFR 100.501 is enforced for the duration
of the event. During the enforcement
period vessels may not enter the
regulated area unless they receive
permission from the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander. Vessel traffic may contact
the Coast Guard Patrol Commander to
request permission to pass through the
regulated area. If permission is granted,
vessels must pass directly through the
regulated area at safe speed and without
loitering. Spectators are only allowed
inside the regulated area if they remain
within the designated spectator area.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
The economic impact of this rule is
not significant for the following reasons:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Aug 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
(i) The regulated area will be in effect
for a limited duration; (ii) the regulated
area has been narrowly tailored to
impose the least impact on general
navigation, yet provide the level of
safety deemed necessary; and (iii)
advance notifications will be made to
the maritime community via marine
information broadcasts and local notices
to mariners, so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly. Additionally, this
rulemaking does not change the
permanent regulated areas that have
been published in 33 CFR 100.501,
Table to § 100.501. In some cases, vessel
traffic may be able to transit the
regulated area when the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander grants permission to
do so. For the above reasons, the Coast
Guard does not anticipate any
significant economic impact.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the
area where the marine event is being
held. This regulation will not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities because it will
be enforced only during a marine event
that has been permitted by the Coast
Guard Captain of the Port. The Captain
of the Port will ensure that small
entities are able to operate in the area
where the event is occurring by
requesting permission from the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander. Vessels may
transit through the regulated area with
the permission of the Patrol
Commander. In some cases, vessels will
be able to safely transit around the
regulated area. Before the enforcement
period, the Coast Guard will issue
maritime advisories so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47041
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
12AUP1
47042
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 155 / Tuesday, August 12, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves implementation of
regulations within 33 CFR Part 100
applicable to organized marine events
on the navigable waters of the United
States that could negatively impact the
safety of waterway users and shore side
activities in the event area. The category
of water activities includes but is not
limited to sail boat regattas, boat
parades, power boat racing, swimming
events, crew racing, canoe and sail
board racing. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. In § 100.501:
■ a. In the Table to § 100.501,
temporarily suspend line No. (b.)20; and
■ b. Add temporary line No. (b.)24 to
the Table to § 100.501 to read as follows:
■
§ 100.501 Special Local Regulations;
Marine Event in the Fifth Coast Guard
District.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE TO § 100.501
[All coordinates listed in the Table to § 100.501 reference Datum NAD 1983]
No.
Date
*
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
24. .............
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Event
*
*
October 4 and 5,
2014.
Location
*
*
*
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore—COTP Zone
*
Chesapeake Challenge.
*
17:25 Aug 11, 2014
Sponsor
*
Chesapeake Bay
Powerboat Association.
*
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
*
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
*
*
*
*
All waters of the Patuxent River, within boundary lines connecting the following positions; originating near north entrance of MD Route 4 bridge, latitude 38° 19′ 45″ N, longitude 076° 28′ 06″ W, thence southwest to south entrance
of MD Route 4 bridge, latitude 38° 19′ 24″ N, longitude
076° 28′ 30″ W, thence south to a point near the shoreline,
latitude 38° 18′ 32″ N, longitude 076° 28′ 14″ W, thence
southeast to a point near the shoreline, latitude 38° 17′ 38″
N, longitude 076° 27′ 26″ W, thence northeast to latitude
38° 18′ 00″ N, longitude 076° 26′ 41″ W, thence northwest
to latitude 38° 18′ 59″ N, longitude 076° 27′ 20″ W, located
at Solomons, MD, thence continuing northwest and parallel
to shoreline to point of origin.
*
Sfmt 4702
*
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
*
12AUP1
*
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 155 / Tuesday, August 12, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Dated: July 28, 2014.
M.M. Dean,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2014–19072 Filed 8–11–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0511; FRL– 9915–04–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
Removal of Two Operating Permits and
a Consent Agreement for the Potomac
River Generating Station From the
State Implementation Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) proposes to approve the
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the
Commonwealth of Virginia removing
from the Virginia SIP two operating
permits and a consent agreement for
GenOn Potomac River, LLC’s Potomac
River Generating Station which was
formerly owned by Potomac Electric
Power Company. In the Final Rules
section of this Federal Register, EPA is
approving the Commonwealth’s SIP
submittal as a direct final rule without
prior proposal because the Agency
views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this action, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing by September 11, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2014–0511 by one of the
following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0511,
Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director,
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Aug 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
Office of Air Quality Planning, Mailcode
3AP30, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2014–
0511. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47043
available at the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality, 629 East Main
Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Becoat, (215) 814–2036, or by
email at becoat.gregory@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For
further information, please see the
information provided in the direct final
action, with the same title, that is
located in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’
section of this Federal Register
publication.
Dated: July 29, 2014.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2014–18927 Filed 8–11–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1983–0002; FRL–9914–
91–Region 8]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List: Partial
Deletion of the California Gulch
Superfund Site
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 8 is issuing a
Notice of Intent to Delete the Operable
Unit 4, (OU4) Upper California Gulch;
Operable Unit 5 (OU5), ASARCO
Smelters/Slag/Mill Sites; and Operable
Unit 7 (OU7), Apache Tailing
Impoundment, of the California Gulch
Superfund Site (Site), located in Lake
County, Colorado, from the National
Priorities List (NPL) and requests public
comments on this proposed action. The
NPL, promulgated pursuant to section
105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an
appendix of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and
the State of Colorado, through the
Colorado Department of Public Health
and the Environment, have determined
that all appropriate response actions at
OU4, OU5 and OU7 under CERCLA,
other than operation, maintenance, and
five-year reviews, have been completed.
However, this deletion does not
preclude future actions under
Superfund.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM
12AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47040-47043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19072]
[[Page 47040]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG-2014-0636]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine Events, Patuxent River;
Solomons, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to temporarily change the enforcement
periods of special local regulations for a recurring marine event in
the Fifth Coast Guard District. These regulations apply to the
Chesapeake Challenge power boat race, a recurring marine event, and
would be effective from October 4, 2014, to October 5, 2014. Special
local regulations are necessary to provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the event. This action is intended to restrict
vessel traffic in a portion of the Patuxent River at Solomons, MD
during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before September 11, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, MD;
telephone 410-576-2674, email Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2014-0636] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2014-0636) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
This marine event is regulated at 33 CFR 100.501. The dates of the
event as published are September 2nd, 3rd or 4th (Friday, Saturday and
Sunday).
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis and authorities for this rulemaking establishing a
special local regulation are found in 33 U.S.C. 1233, which authorize
the Coast Guard to establish and define special local regulations. The
Captain of the Port Baltimore is establishing a special local
regulation for the waters of the Patuxent River, near Solomons, MD to
protect event participants, spectators and transiting vessels. Entry
into this area is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port Baltimore or designated representative.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
Marine events are frequently held on the navigable waters within
the boundary of the Fifth Coast Guard District. The activities that
typically comprise marine events include but are not limited to sailing
regattas, power boat races, swim races and holiday parades. The
regulation listing annual marine events within the Fifth Coast Guard
District and their regulated dates
[[Page 47041]]
is 33 CFR 100.501. The Table to Sec. 100.501 identifies marine events
by Captain of the Port zone. For a description of the geographical area
of each Coast Guard Sector--Captain of the Port Zone, please see 33 CFR
3.25.
Event planners notified the Coast Guard of date changes for the
``Chesapeake Challenge'' marine event that is listed at 33 CFR 100.501,
Table to Sec. 100.501. This regulation temporarily changes the
enforcement periods for this marine event for 2014 only. The
enforcement dates for 2014 are October 4, 2014, and October 5, 2014.
The annual ``Chesapeake Challenge,'' marine event is sponsored by
the Chesapeake Bay Powerboat Association; and takes place on the waters
of the Patuxent River at Solomons, MD. The regulation at 33 CFR 100.501
is effective annually for the Chesapeake Challenge marine event. The
event consists of power boat racing on the waters of the Patuxent River
at Solomons, MD. Participants operate on a marked course with sponsor-
provided support craft. Therefore, to ensure the safety of participants
and support vessels, 33 CFR 100.501 is enforced for the duration of the
event. During the enforcement period vessels may not enter the
regulated area unless they receive permission from the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander. Vessel traffic may contact the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander to request permission to pass through the regulated area. If
permission is granted, vessels must pass directly through the regulated
area at safe speed and without loitering. Spectators are only allowed
inside the regulated area if they remain within the designated
spectator area.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
The economic impact of this rule is not significant for the
following reasons: (i) The regulated area will be in effect for a
limited duration; (ii) the regulated area has been narrowly tailored to
impose the least impact on general navigation, yet provide the level of
safety deemed necessary; and (iii) advance notifications will be made
to the maritime community via marine information broadcasts and local
notices to mariners, so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
Additionally, this rulemaking does not change the permanent regulated
areas that have been published in 33 CFR 100.501, Table to Sec.
100.501. In some cases, vessel traffic may be able to transit the
regulated area when the Coast Guard Patrol Commander grants permission
to do so. For the above reasons, the Coast Guard does not anticipate
any significant economic impact.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This rule may affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the area where the marine
event is being held. This regulation will not have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small entities because it will be enforced
only during a marine event that has been permitted by the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port. The Captain of the Port will ensure that small
entities are able to operate in the area where the event is occurring
by requesting permission from the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. Vessels
may transit through the regulated area with the permission of the
Patrol Commander. In some cases, vessels will be able to safely transit
around the regulated area. Before the enforcement period, the Coast
Guard will issue maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with
[[Page 47042]]
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category
of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves
implementation of regulations within 33 CFR Part 100 applicable to
organized marine events on the navigable waters of the United States
that could negatively impact the safety of waterway users and shore
side activities in the event area. The category of water activities
includes but is not limited to sail boat regattas, boat parades, power
boat racing, swimming events, crew racing, canoe and sail board racing.
This rule is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
34(h) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
0
2. In Sec. 100.501:
0
a. In the Table to Sec. 100.501, temporarily suspend line No. (b.)20;
and
0
b. Add temporary line No. (b.)24 to the Table to Sec. 100.501 to read
as follows:
Sec. 100.501 Special Local Regulations; Marine Event in the Fifth
Coast Guard District.
* * * * *
Table to Sec. 100.501
[All coordinates listed in the Table to Sec. 100.501 reference Datum NAD 1983]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Date Event Sponsor Location
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore--COTP Zone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
24............... October 4 and 5, Chesapeake Chesapeake Bay All waters of the Patuxent River,
2014. Challenge. Powerboat within boundary lines connecting
Association. the following positions;
originating near north entrance
of MD Route 4 bridge, latitude
38[deg] 19' 45'' N, longitude
076[deg] 28' 06'' W, thence
southwest to south entrance of
MD Route 4 bridge, latitude
38[deg] 19' 24'' N, longitude
076[deg] 28' 30'' W, thence
south to a point near the
shoreline, latitude 38[deg] 18'
32'' N, longitude 076[deg] 28'
14'' W, thence southeast to a
point near the shoreline,
latitude 38[deg] 17' 38'' N,
longitude 076[deg] 27' 26'' W,
thence northeast to latitude
38[deg] 18' 00'' N, longitude
076[deg] 26' 41'' W, thence
northwest to latitude 38[deg]
18' 59'' N, longitude 076[deg]
27' 20'' W, located at Solomons,
MD, thence continuing northwest
and parallel to shoreline to
point of origin.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 47043]]
Dated: July 28, 2014.
M.M. Dean,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2014-19072 Filed 8-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P