Sequoia National Forest, California; Tobias Forest Ecosystem Restoration Project, 47082-47083 [2014-19005]

Download as PDF 47082 Notices Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 155 Tuesday, August 12, 2014 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency statements of organization and functions are examples of documents appearing in this section. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES August 6, 2014. The Department of Agriculture has submitted the following information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. Comments regarding (a) whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of burden including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments regarding this information collection received by September 11, 2014 will be considered. Written comments should be addressed to: Desk Officer for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20502. Commenters are encouraged to submit their comments to OMB via email to: OIRA_Submission@ OMB.EOP.GOV or fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250–7602. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling (202) 720–8958. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:45 Aug 11, 2014 Jkt 232001 number and the agency informs potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information that such persons are not required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Title: NAHMS Emergency Epidemiologic Investigation. OMB Control Number: 0579–0376. Summary of Collection: Collection and dissemination of animal health data and information is mandated by 7 U.S.C. 391, the Animal Industry Act of 1884, which established the precursor of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Veterinary Services, the Bureau of Animal Industry. Legal requirements for examining and reporting on animal disease control methods were further mandated by 7 U.S.C. 8308, 8314 of the Animal Health Protection Act, ‘‘Detection, Control, and Eradication of Disease and Pests,’’ May 13, 2002. Emergency epidemiologic investigations will allow Veterinary Services Officials to rapidly implement prevention and control measures, keep the public informed to reduce fear or panic, and keep international markets open by informing trading partners. Need and Use of the Information: The primary objective of the National Animal Health Monitoring System’s (NAHMS) emergency epidemiologic investigation is to provide for the prevention and control of animal disease conditions and protect the U.S. livestock population from the introduction and spread of domestic, emerging, zoonotic, and foreign animal disease. APHIS will collect information using a questionnaire or telephone interview or direct interview. APHIS will use the data collected to (1) Identify the scope of the problem (2) Define and describe the affected population and the susceptible population (3) Predict or detect trends in disease occurrence and movement (4) Understand the risk factors for disease (5) Estimate the cost of disease control and develop intervention options (6) Provide parameters for mathematical models of animal disease to evaluate potential control scenarios (7) Make recommendation for disease control (8) Provide lessons learned and guidance on the best methods to avoid future outbreaks (9) Identify areas for further PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 research e.g. mechanisms of disease transfer, vaccine technology, and diagnostic testing needs. Description of Respondents: Business or other for-profit. Number of Respondents: 8,000. Frequency of Responses: Reporting: On occasion. Total Burden Hours: 6.077. Ruth Brown, Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2014–18957 Filed 8–11–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–34–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Sequoia National Forest, California; Tobias Forest Ecosystem Restoration Project Forest Service, USDA. Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement. AGENCY: ACTION: The Forest Service proposes ecological restoration in the Tobias Forest Ecosystem Restoration Project (Tobias Project) by encouraging a healthy and diverse forest ecosystem that is resilient to the effects of wildfire, drought, disease, and other disturbances. The Tobias Project is located in the Greenhorn Mountains on the Western Divide Ranger District, between Alta Sierra and Johnsondale in Tulare County, California. This project includes commercially thinning stands of mature trees (smaller than 30 inches diameter at breast height) to increase heterogeneity and resilience on 960 acres. An additional 3,300 acres are proposed for hand thinning of immature trees. To restore the historic species composition, areas selected for thinning would favor Jeffrey and sugar pines, oak, and other shade intolerant species. DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received by September 11, 2014. The draft environmental impact statement is expected November 2014 and the final environmental impact statement is expected June 2015. ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Rick Stevens, District Ranger, Western Divide Ranger District, 32588 Hwy 190, Springville, CA 93265. Comments may also be sent via email to commentsSUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM 12AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 155 / Tuesday, August 12, 2014 / Notices pacificsouthwest-sequoia@fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to (559) 539–2067. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: O’Dell Tucker, Planner, Western Divide Ranger District, 32588 Hwy 190, Springville, CA 93265. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Rely Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background A scoping letter was sent on May 8, 2013 for the proposed Tobias Forest Ecosystem Restoration Project. The Forest Service after reviewing public comments, interdisciplinary input on the proposed action, and further field surveys for soils, permanent streams, and meadows, decided to issue a Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The decision to prepare an EIS addresses the comments received during the initial scoping period, as well as the additional resource needs and concerns discovered while conducting field surveys. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES Purpose and Need for Action The purpose of the project is to restore and maintain the forests throughout the project area to promote a healthy, diverse forest ecosystem that is resilient to the effects of wildfire, drought, disease, and other disturbances. There is a need to increase diversity in age, density, and stand structure; modify tree species composition to favor oaks and pines (Jeffrey and sugar) over incense-cedar and white fir; modify fuel conditions to reduce the risk of uncharacteristically large, stand-replacing fires; improve wildlife habitat structure for resting, roosting, denning, and nesting purposes for forest-dependent wildlife species; support local economies with sustainable and cost-effective use of any byproducts of project implementation; improve watershed conditions by decommissioning some roads when the project concludes, in addition to routine maintenance of existing roads. Proposed Action The proposed action includes commercial (ground skidding and skyline yarding) thinning stands of mature trees smaller than 30 inches diameter at breast height (dbh) to increase heterogeneity and resilience on 960 acres. An additional 3,300 acres are proposed for hand thinning of immature trees less than 10 inches dbh. Approximately 10 percent of the handthinned acreage (∼350 acres) would be VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:45 Aug 11, 2014 Jkt 232001 masticated. Areas selected for thinning and mastication would favor Jeffrey and sugar pines, oak, and other shade intolerant species, to restore the historic species composition. Prescibed fire would be introduced on the landscape after thinning and mastication are completed to reduce surface fuels and promote natural regeneration of species indigenous to the project area. Large snags and large woody debris would be protected. Riparian areas and meadows would be protected and improved. Approximately eight (8) miles of road decommissioning is proposed to improve the watershed condition, stream habitat, and water quality. The proposal also includes 450 acres of fuelbreak treatment along ridgelines. Possible Alternatives In addition to the proposed action, the EIS will evaluate the required No Action Alternative and an alternative that uses non-commercial treatments on the same acres as the proposed action. Other alternatives may be identified through the interdisciplinary process and public participation. Responsible Official 47083 Comment Requested This project will follow the new objection procedures as directed by 36 CFR 218. The objection process provides an opportunity for members of the public who have participated in opportunities for public participation provided throughout the planning process to have any unresolved concerns receive an independent review by the Forest Service prior to a final decision being made by the responsible official. Only those who provided specific written comments during opportunities for public comment are eligible to file an objection. Comments received in response to this solicitation, including the names and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record on this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered, however anonymous comments will not provide the Agency with the ability to provide the respondent with subsequent environmental documents. Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section 21. The responsible official is Kevin B. Elliott, Forest Supervisor, Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb Street, Porterville, CA 93257. Dated: August 6, 2014. Kevin B. Elliott, Forest Supervisor. Nature of Decision To Be Made BILLING CODE 3410–11–P The responsible official will decide whether to adopt and implement the proposed action, an alternative to the proposed action, or take no action with respect to the Tobias Forest Ecosystem Restoration project. This Notice of Intent intiates the scoping process which guides the development of the EIS. It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in such a manner that they are useful to the agency’s preparation of the enviornmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer’s concerns and contentions. Specific written comments are defined as comments ‘‘. . . within the scope of the proposed action, have a direct relationship to the proposed action, and must include supporting reasons for the responsible official to consider.’’ (36 CFR 218.2). Submission of timely, specific written comments is a prerequisite for eligibility to file an objection under the 36 CFR part 218 regulations. Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Office of Advocacy and Outreach [FOA No.: OAO–00007] Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers Policy Research Center Scoping Process PO 00000 [FR Doc. 2014–19005 Filed 8–11–14; 8:45 am] Sfmt 4703 Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) No.: 10.464. Office of Advocacy and Outreach (OAO), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). ACTION: Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA). AGENCY: This notice announces the availability of funds and solicits applications from eligible institutions to compete for financial assistance in the form of a grant to establish a Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers Policy Research Center (The Center) at an 1890 Institution (as defined in 7 U.S.C. 7601). SUMMARY: Authority: The Agricultural Act of 2014, Title XII, Subtitle B, provides funding for a ‘‘Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers Policy Research Center.’’ Section 12203 directs the Secretary to award a grant to a college or university eligible to receive E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM 12AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47082-47083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19005]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Sequoia National Forest, California; Tobias Forest Ecosystem 
Restoration Project

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service proposes ecological restoration in the 
Tobias Forest Ecosystem Restoration Project (Tobias Project) by 
encouraging a healthy and diverse forest ecosystem that is resilient to 
the effects of wildfire, drought, disease, and other disturbances. The 
Tobias Project is located in the Greenhorn Mountains on the Western 
Divide Ranger District, between Alta Sierra and Johnsondale in Tulare 
County, California. This project includes commercially thinning stands 
of mature trees (smaller than 30 inches diameter at breast height) to 
increase heterogeneity and resilience on 960 acres. An additional 3,300 
acres are proposed for hand thinning of immature trees. To restore the 
historic species composition, areas selected for thinning would favor 
Jeffrey and sugar pines, oak, and other shade intolerant species.

DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received 
by September 11, 2014. The draft environmental impact statement is 
expected November 2014 and the final environmental impact statement is 
expected June 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Rick Stevens, District Ranger, 
Western Divide Ranger District, 32588 Hwy 190, Springville, CA 93265. 
Comments may also be sent via email to comments-

[[Page 47083]]

pacificsouthwest-sequoia@fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to (559) 539-2067.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: O'Dell Tucker, Planner, Western Divide 
Ranger District, 32588 Hwy 190, Springville, CA 93265.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Rely Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    A scoping letter was sent on May 8, 2013 for the proposed Tobias 
Forest Ecosystem Restoration Project. The Forest Service after 
reviewing public comments, interdisciplinary input on the proposed 
action, and further field surveys for soils, permanent streams, and 
meadows, decided to issue a Notice of Intent to prepare an 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The decision to prepare an EIS 
addresses the comments received during the initial scoping period, as 
well as the additional resource needs and concerns discovered while 
conducting field surveys.

Purpose and Need for Action

    The purpose of the project is to restore and maintain the forests 
throughout the project area to promote a healthy, diverse forest 
ecosystem that is resilient to the effects of wildfire, drought, 
disease, and other disturbances. There is a need to increase diversity 
in age, density, and stand structure; modify tree species composition 
to favor oaks and pines (Jeffrey and sugar) over incense-cedar and 
white fir; modify fuel conditions to reduce the risk of 
uncharacteristically large, stand-replacing fires; improve wildlife 
habitat structure for resting, roosting, denning, and nesting purposes 
for forest-dependent wildlife species; support local economies with 
sustainable and cost-effective use of any byproducts of project 
implementation; improve watershed conditions by decommissioning some 
roads when the project concludes, in addition to routine maintenance of 
existing roads.

Proposed Action

    The proposed action includes commercial (ground skidding and 
skyline yarding) thinning stands of mature trees smaller than 30 inches 
diameter at breast height (dbh) to increase heterogeneity and 
resilience on 960 acres. An additional 3,300 acres are proposed for 
hand thinning of immature trees less than 10 inches dbh. Approximately 
10 percent of the hand-thinned acreage (~350 acres) would be 
masticated. Areas selected for thinning and mastication would favor 
Jeffrey and sugar pines, oak, and other shade intolerant species, to 
restore the historic species composition. Prescibed fire would be 
introduced on the landscape after thinning and mastication are 
completed to reduce surface fuels and promote natural regeneration of 
species indigenous to the project area. Large snags and large woody 
debris would be protected. Riparian areas and meadows would be 
protected and improved. Approximately eight (8) miles of road 
decommissioning is proposed to improve the watershed condition, stream 
habitat, and water quality. The proposal also includes 450 acres of 
fuelbreak treatment along ridgelines.

Possible Alternatives

    In addition to the proposed action, the EIS will evaluate the 
required No Action Alternative and an alternative that uses non-
commercial treatments on the same acres as the proposed action. Other 
alternatives may be identified through the interdisciplinary process 
and public participation.

Responsible Official

    The responsible official is Kevin B. Elliott, Forest Supervisor, 
Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb Street, Porterville, CA 
93257.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

    The responsible official will decide whether to adopt and implement 
the proposed action, an alternative to the proposed action, or take no 
action with respect to the Tobias Forest Ecosystem Restoration project.

Scoping Process

    This Notice of Intent intiates the scoping process which guides the 
development of the EIS. It is important that reviewers provide their 
comments at such times and in such a manner that they are useful to the 
agency's preparation of the enviornmental impact statement. Therefore, 
comments should be provided prior to the close of the comment period 
and should clearly articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
    Specific written comments are defined as comments ``. . . within 
the scope of the proposed action, have a direct relationship to the 
proposed action, and must include supporting reasons for the 
responsible official to consider.'' (36 CFR 218.2). Submission of 
timely, specific written comments is a prerequisite for eligibility to 
file an objection under the 36 CFR part 218 regulations.

Comment Requested

    This project will follow the new objection procedures as directed 
by 36 CFR 218. The objection process provides an opportunity for 
members of the public who have participated in opportunities for public 
participation provided throughout the planning process to have any 
unresolved concerns receive an independent review by the Forest Service 
prior to a final decision being made by the responsible official. Only 
those who provided specific written comments during opportunities for 
public comment are eligible to file an objection.
    Comments received in response to this solicitation, including the 
names and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public 
record on this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be 
accepted and considered, however anonymous comments will not provide 
the Agency with the ability to provide the respondent with subsequent 
environmental documents.

    Authority:  40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook 
1909.15, Section 21.

    Dated: August 6, 2014.
Kevin B. Elliott,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2014-19005 Filed 8-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.