Sequoia National Forest, California; Tobias Forest Ecosystem Restoration Project, 47082-47083 [2014-19005]
Download as PDF
47082
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 155
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
August 6, 2014.
The Department of Agriculture has
submitted the following information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Comments
regarding (a) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of burden including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments regarding this information
collection received by September 11,
2014 will be considered. Written
comments should be addressed to: Desk
Officer for Agriculture, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), New Executive Office Building,
725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC
20502. Commenters are encouraged to
submit their comments to OMB via
email to: OIRA_Submission@
OMB.EOP.GOV or fax (202) 395–5806
and to Departmental Clearance Office,
USDA, OCIO, Mail Stop 7602,
Washington, DC 20250–7602. Copies of
the submission(s) may be obtained by
calling (202) 720–8958.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Aug 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
Title: NAHMS Emergency
Epidemiologic Investigation.
OMB Control Number: 0579–0376.
Summary of Collection: Collection
and dissemination of animal health data
and information is mandated by 7
U.S.C. 391, the Animal Industry Act of
1884, which established the precursor of
the Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS), Veterinary Services,
the Bureau of Animal Industry. Legal
requirements for examining and
reporting on animal disease control
methods were further mandated by 7
U.S.C. 8308, 8314 of the Animal Health
Protection Act, ‘‘Detection, Control, and
Eradication of Disease and Pests,’’ May
13, 2002. Emergency epidemiologic
investigations will allow Veterinary
Services Officials to rapidly implement
prevention and control measures, keep
the public informed to reduce fear or
panic, and keep international markets
open by informing trading partners.
Need and Use of the Information: The
primary objective of the National
Animal Health Monitoring System’s
(NAHMS) emergency epidemiologic
investigation is to provide for the
prevention and control of animal
disease conditions and protect the U.S.
livestock population from the
introduction and spread of domestic,
emerging, zoonotic, and foreign animal
disease. APHIS will collect information
using a questionnaire or telephone
interview or direct interview. APHIS
will use the data collected to (1) Identify
the scope of the problem (2) Define and
describe the affected population and the
susceptible population (3) Predict or
detect trends in disease occurrence and
movement (4) Understand the risk
factors for disease (5) Estimate the cost
of disease control and develop
intervention options (6) Provide
parameters for mathematical models of
animal disease to evaluate potential
control scenarios (7) Make
recommendation for disease control (8)
Provide lessons learned and guidance
on the best methods to avoid future
outbreaks (9) Identify areas for further
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
research e.g. mechanisms of disease
transfer, vaccine technology, and
diagnostic testing needs.
Description of Respondents: Business
or other for-profit.
Number of Respondents: 8,000.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
On occasion.
Total Burden Hours: 6.077.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–18957 Filed 8–11–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Sequoia National Forest, California;
Tobias Forest Ecosystem Restoration
Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Forest Service proposes
ecological restoration in the Tobias
Forest Ecosystem Restoration Project
(Tobias Project) by encouraging a
healthy and diverse forest ecosystem
that is resilient to the effects of wildfire,
drought, disease, and other
disturbances. The Tobias Project is
located in the Greenhorn Mountains on
the Western Divide Ranger District,
between Alta Sierra and Johnsondale in
Tulare County, California. This project
includes commercially thinning stands
of mature trees (smaller than 30 inches
diameter at breast height) to increase
heterogeneity and resilience on 960
acres. An additional 3,300 acres are
proposed for hand thinning of immature
trees. To restore the historic species
composition, areas selected for thinning
would favor Jeffrey and sugar pines,
oak, and other shade intolerant species.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
September 11, 2014. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected November 2014 and the final
environmental impact statement is
expected June 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Rick Stevens, District Ranger, Western
Divide Ranger District, 32588 Hwy 190,
Springville, CA 93265. Comments may
also be sent via email to commentsSUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 155 / Tuesday, August 12, 2014 / Notices
pacificsouthwest-sequoia@fs.fed.us, or
via facsimile to (559) 539–2067.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
O’Dell Tucker, Planner, Western Divide
Ranger District, 32588 Hwy 190,
Springville, CA 93265.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Rely Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Eastern Time,
Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
A scoping letter was sent on May 8,
2013 for the proposed Tobias Forest
Ecosystem Restoration Project. The
Forest Service after reviewing public
comments, interdisciplinary input on
the proposed action, and further field
surveys for soils, permanent streams,
and meadows, decided to issue a Notice
of Intent to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS). The decision to
prepare an EIS addresses the comments
received during the initial scoping
period, as well as the additional
resource needs and concerns discovered
while conducting field surveys.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the project is to
restore and maintain the forests
throughout the project area to promote
a healthy, diverse forest ecosystem that
is resilient to the effects of wildfire,
drought, disease, and other
disturbances. There is a need to increase
diversity in age, density, and stand
structure; modify tree species
composition to favor oaks and pines
(Jeffrey and sugar) over incense-cedar
and white fir; modify fuel conditions to
reduce the risk of uncharacteristically
large, stand-replacing fires; improve
wildlife habitat structure for resting,
roosting, denning, and nesting purposes
for forest-dependent wildlife species;
support local economies with
sustainable and cost-effective use of any
byproducts of project implementation;
improve watershed conditions by
decommissioning some roads when the
project concludes, in addition to routine
maintenance of existing roads.
Proposed Action
The proposed action includes
commercial (ground skidding and
skyline yarding) thinning stands of
mature trees smaller than 30 inches
diameter at breast height (dbh) to
increase heterogeneity and resilience on
960 acres. An additional 3,300 acres are
proposed for hand thinning of immature
trees less than 10 inches dbh.
Approximately 10 percent of the handthinned acreage (∼350 acres) would be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:45 Aug 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
masticated. Areas selected for thinning
and mastication would favor Jeffrey and
sugar pines, oak, and other shade
intolerant species, to restore the historic
species composition. Prescibed fire
would be introduced on the landscape
after thinning and mastication are
completed to reduce surface fuels and
promote natural regeneration of species
indigenous to the project area. Large
snags and large woody debris would be
protected. Riparian areas and meadows
would be protected and improved.
Approximately eight (8) miles of road
decommissioning is proposed to
improve the watershed condition,
stream habitat, and water quality. The
proposal also includes 450 acres of
fuelbreak treatment along ridgelines.
Possible Alternatives
In addition to the proposed action, the
EIS will evaluate the required No Action
Alternative and an alternative that uses
non-commercial treatments on the same
acres as the proposed action. Other
alternatives may be identified through
the interdisciplinary process and public
participation.
Responsible Official
47083
Comment Requested
This project will follow the new
objection procedures as directed by 36
CFR 218. The objection process
provides an opportunity for members of
the public who have participated in
opportunities for public participation
provided throughout the planning
process to have any unresolved
concerns receive an independent review
by the Forest Service prior to a final
decision being made by the responsible
official. Only those who provided
specific written comments during
opportunities for public comment are
eligible to file an objection.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including the names
and addresses of those who comment,
will be part of the public record on this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered, however anonymous
comments will not provide the Agency
with the ability to provide the
respondent with subsequent
environmental documents.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21.
The responsible official is Kevin B.
Elliott, Forest Supervisor, Sequoia
National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb
Street, Porterville, CA 93257.
Dated: August 6, 2014.
Kevin B. Elliott,
Forest Supervisor.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
The responsible official will decide
whether to adopt and implement the
proposed action, an alternative to the
proposed action, or take no action with
respect to the Tobias Forest Ecosystem
Restoration project.
This Notice of Intent intiates the
scoping process which guides the
development of the EIS. It is important
that reviewers provide their comments
at such times and in such a manner that
they are useful to the agency’s
preparation of the enviornmental impact
statement. Therefore, comments should
be provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
Specific written comments are
defined as comments ‘‘. . . within the
scope of the proposed action, have a
direct relationship to the proposed
action, and must include supporting
reasons for the responsible official to
consider.’’ (36 CFR 218.2). Submission
of timely, specific written comments is
a prerequisite for eligibility to file an
objection under the 36 CFR part 218
regulations.
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Office of Advocacy and Outreach
[FOA No.: OAO–00007]
Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and
Ranchers Policy Research Center
Scoping Process
PO 00000
[FR Doc. 2014–19005 Filed 8–11–14; 8:45 am]
Sfmt 4703
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) No.: 10.464.
Office of Advocacy and
Outreach (OAO), United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Funding Opportunity
Announcement (FOA).
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
availability of funds and solicits
applications from eligible institutions to
compete for financial assistance in the
form of a grant to establish a Socially
Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers
Policy Research Center (The Center) at
an 1890 Institution (as defined in 7
U.S.C. 7601).
SUMMARY:
Authority: The Agricultural Act of 2014,
Title XII, Subtitle B, provides funding for a
‘‘Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and
Ranchers Policy Research Center.’’ Section
12203 directs the Secretary to award a grant
to a college or university eligible to receive
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47082-47083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19005]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Sequoia National Forest, California; Tobias Forest Ecosystem
Restoration Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service proposes ecological restoration in the
Tobias Forest Ecosystem Restoration Project (Tobias Project) by
encouraging a healthy and diverse forest ecosystem that is resilient to
the effects of wildfire, drought, disease, and other disturbances. The
Tobias Project is located in the Greenhorn Mountains on the Western
Divide Ranger District, between Alta Sierra and Johnsondale in Tulare
County, California. This project includes commercially thinning stands
of mature trees (smaller than 30 inches diameter at breast height) to
increase heterogeneity and resilience on 960 acres. An additional 3,300
acres are proposed for hand thinning of immature trees. To restore the
historic species composition, areas selected for thinning would favor
Jeffrey and sugar pines, oak, and other shade intolerant species.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by September 11, 2014. The draft environmental impact statement is
expected November 2014 and the final environmental impact statement is
expected June 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Rick Stevens, District Ranger,
Western Divide Ranger District, 32588 Hwy 190, Springville, CA 93265.
Comments may also be sent via email to comments-
[[Page 47083]]
pacificsouthwest-sequoia@fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to (559) 539-2067.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: O'Dell Tucker, Planner, Western Divide
Ranger District, 32588 Hwy 190, Springville, CA 93265.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Rely Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
A scoping letter was sent on May 8, 2013 for the proposed Tobias
Forest Ecosystem Restoration Project. The Forest Service after
reviewing public comments, interdisciplinary input on the proposed
action, and further field surveys for soils, permanent streams, and
meadows, decided to issue a Notice of Intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The decision to prepare an EIS
addresses the comments received during the initial scoping period, as
well as the additional resource needs and concerns discovered while
conducting field surveys.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the project is to restore and maintain the forests
throughout the project area to promote a healthy, diverse forest
ecosystem that is resilient to the effects of wildfire, drought,
disease, and other disturbances. There is a need to increase diversity
in age, density, and stand structure; modify tree species composition
to favor oaks and pines (Jeffrey and sugar) over incense-cedar and
white fir; modify fuel conditions to reduce the risk of
uncharacteristically large, stand-replacing fires; improve wildlife
habitat structure for resting, roosting, denning, and nesting purposes
for forest-dependent wildlife species; support local economies with
sustainable and cost-effective use of any byproducts of project
implementation; improve watershed conditions by decommissioning some
roads when the project concludes, in addition to routine maintenance of
existing roads.
Proposed Action
The proposed action includes commercial (ground skidding and
skyline yarding) thinning stands of mature trees smaller than 30 inches
diameter at breast height (dbh) to increase heterogeneity and
resilience on 960 acres. An additional 3,300 acres are proposed for
hand thinning of immature trees less than 10 inches dbh. Approximately
10 percent of the hand-thinned acreage (~350 acres) would be
masticated. Areas selected for thinning and mastication would favor
Jeffrey and sugar pines, oak, and other shade intolerant species, to
restore the historic species composition. Prescibed fire would be
introduced on the landscape after thinning and mastication are
completed to reduce surface fuels and promote natural regeneration of
species indigenous to the project area. Large snags and large woody
debris would be protected. Riparian areas and meadows would be
protected and improved. Approximately eight (8) miles of road
decommissioning is proposed to improve the watershed condition, stream
habitat, and water quality. The proposal also includes 450 acres of
fuelbreak treatment along ridgelines.
Possible Alternatives
In addition to the proposed action, the EIS will evaluate the
required No Action Alternative and an alternative that uses non-
commercial treatments on the same acres as the proposed action. Other
alternatives may be identified through the interdisciplinary process
and public participation.
Responsible Official
The responsible official is Kevin B. Elliott, Forest Supervisor,
Sequoia National Forest, 1839 South Newcomb Street, Porterville, CA
93257.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The responsible official will decide whether to adopt and implement
the proposed action, an alternative to the proposed action, or take no
action with respect to the Tobias Forest Ecosystem Restoration project.
Scoping Process
This Notice of Intent intiates the scoping process which guides the
development of the EIS. It is important that reviewers provide their
comments at such times and in such a manner that they are useful to the
agency's preparation of the enviornmental impact statement. Therefore,
comments should be provided prior to the close of the comment period
and should clearly articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions.
Specific written comments are defined as comments ``. . . within
the scope of the proposed action, have a direct relationship to the
proposed action, and must include supporting reasons for the
responsible official to consider.'' (36 CFR 218.2). Submission of
timely, specific written comments is a prerequisite for eligibility to
file an objection under the 36 CFR part 218 regulations.
Comment Requested
This project will follow the new objection procedures as directed
by 36 CFR 218. The objection process provides an opportunity for
members of the public who have participated in opportunities for public
participation provided throughout the planning process to have any
unresolved concerns receive an independent review by the Forest Service
prior to a final decision being made by the responsible official. Only
those who provided specific written comments during opportunities for
public comment are eligible to file an objection.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including the
names and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public
record on this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered, however anonymous comments will not provide
the Agency with the ability to provide the respondent with subsequent
environmental documents.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21.
Dated: August 6, 2014.
Kevin B. Elliott,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2014-19005 Filed 8-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P