Orders of Compliance, Cease and Desist Orders, Orders of Denial, and Other Orders, 46964-46968 [2014-18294]
Download as PDF
46964
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 155 / Tuesday, August 12, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
CATTLE AND CALVES 1—Continued
State/Unit
(1,000 head)
38. Importer 2 ...........................................................................................................................................................
Directors
5,927
6
1 2011,
2012, and 2013 average of January 1 cattle inventory data.
2 2010, 2011, and 2012 average of annual import data.
*
*
*
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
4. In § 1260.312, paragraph (c) is
revised to read as follows:
Federal Aviation Administration
§ 1260.312 Remittance to the Cattlemen’s
Board or Qualified State Beef Council.
14 CFR Part 13
■
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Remittances. The remitting person
shall remit all assessments to the
qualified State beef council or its
designee, or if there is no qualified State
beef council, to the Cattlemen’s Board at
P.O. Box 803834, Kansas City, MO
64180–3834, with the report required in
paragraph (a) of this section not later
than the 15th day of the following
month. All remittances sent to a
qualified State beef council or the
Cattlemen’s Board by the remitting
persons shall be by check or money
order payable to the order of the
qualified State beef council or the
Cattlemen’s Board. All remittances shall
be received subject to collection and
payment at par.
5. Section 1260.316 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 1260.316 Paperwork Reduction Act
assigned number.
The information collection and
recordkeeping requirements contained
in this part have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the provisions of 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35 and have been assigned
OMB control number 0581–0093.
Dated: August 7, 2014.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–19029 Filed 8–11–14; 8:45 am]
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:28 Aug 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
[Docket No.: FAA–2014–0505; Amdt. No.
13–36]
RIN 2120–AK43
Orders of Compliance, Cease and
Desist Orders, Orders of Denial, and
Other Orders
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Immediate final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This rulemaking provides the
opportunity for an informal conference
with an FAA attorney before an order is
issued under the FAA’s regulation
covering orders other than certificate
action and civil penalty orders. This
change is necessary to provide
additional fairness and process to those
persons who are subject to such an
order, and is consistent with the process
available in other enforcement actions.
These conferences may result in either
a resolution of the matter or a narrowing
of the issues, thereby conserving
resources for respondents and the FAA.
DATES: Effective October 14, 2014.
Submit comments on or before
September 11, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number, FAA–2014–0505
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
public to better inform its rulemaking
process. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal
information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical or legal questions concerning
this action, contact Edmund Averman,
Office of the Chief Counsel (AGC–210),
Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
267–3147; email Ed.Averman@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Good Cause for Immediate Adoption
Section 553(b)(3)(A) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553) authorizes agencies to
dispense with notice and comment
procedures for rules when the agency
for ‘‘good cause’’ finds that those
procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ Under this section, an agency,
upon finding good cause, may issue a
final rule without seeking comment
prior to the rulemaking.
The FAA finds that notice and public
comment to this immediately adopted
final rule are impracticable,
unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest. This rulemaking provides the
opportunity for an informal conference
with an FAA attorney before an order is
issued under § 13.20. Since this change
provides additional fairness and process
to those persons who are subject to such
an order, this amendment should not
adversely impact those covered by an
order. In fact, these conferences may
result in a resolution of the matter or, in
some cases, a narrowing of the issues,
thereby conserving resources for
respondents and the FAA. Finally, these
conferences are optional.
E:\FR\FM\12AUR1.SGM
12AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 155 / Tuesday, August 12, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Therefore, the FAA has determined
that notice and public comment are
unnecessary.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Comments Invited
For the reasons noted above, the FAA
is adopting this final rule without prior
notice and public comment. The
Regulatory Policies and Procedures of
the Department of Transportation (DOT)
(44 FR 1134; February 26, 1979),
provide that, to the maximum extent
possible, operating administrations for
the DOT should provide an opportunity
for public comment on regulations
issued without prior notice.
The FAA invites interested persons to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written comments, data, or
views. The agency also invites
comments relating to the economic,
environmental, energy, or federalism
impacts that might result from adopting
the changes. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
this rule, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
please send only one copy of written
comments, or, if you are filing
comments electronically, please submit
your comments only one time.
The FAA will file in the docket all
comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this rulemaking. Once the
comment period closes, the FAA will
review and dispose of the comments
filed in the rulemaking docket. Because
this is a final rule, the FAA will publish
a disposition of comments in the
Federal Register. Based on the
comments received, the FAA will state
whether it has decided that (i) no action
is necessary other than publishing the
disposition of comments in the Federal
Register, or (ii) the FAA should prepare
a revised final rule.
Proprietary or Confidential Business
Information
Do not file in the docket information
that you consider to be proprietary or
confidential business information. Send
or deliver this information directly to
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document. Mark the information that is
considered proprietary or confidential.
If the information is on a disk or CD
ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD
ROM and also identify electronically
within the disk or CD ROM the specific
information that is proprietary or
confidential.
Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), when the
FAA is aware of proprietary information
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:41 Aug 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
filed with a comment, the agency does
not place it in the docket. The FAA
holds it in a separate file to which the
public does not have access, and the
agency places a note in the docket that
it has received it. If the FAA receives a
request to examine or copy this
information, the FAA treats it as any
other request under the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. The FAA
processes such a request under the DOT
procedures found in 49 CFR part 7.
Authority for this Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules on
aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the
United States Code. Subtitle I, Section
106 describes the authority of the FAA
Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the
scope of the agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701, ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under
that section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations required in the
interest of safety for the design and
performance of aircraft; regulations and
minimum standards in the interest of
safety for inspecting, servicing, and
overhauling aircraft; and regulations for
other practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
I. Discussion of the Final Rule
Section 13.20 of 14 CFR part 13
(Orders of compliance, cease and desist
orders, orders of denial, and other
orders) applies to a variety of orders
issued by the Administrator to carry out
the provisions of the Federal Aviation
Act of 1958, as amended, the Hazardous
Materials Transportation Act, the
Airport and Airway Development Act of
1970, and the Airport and Airway
Improvement Act of 1982, or the Airport
and Airway Improvement Act of 1982 as
amended by the Airport and Airway
Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of
1987. This section does not apply to
orders issued under the authority of 49
U.S.C. 46301 (assessing civil penalties)
or 49 U.S.C. 44709 (amendments,
modifications, suspensions, and
revocations of certain certificates).
Paragraph (c) of § 13.20 allows, within
30 days after service of the notice, a
person subject to an order to reply in
writing or request a hearing in
accordance with subpart D of part 13.
This rule amends that paragraph to add
a third option—an opportunity to be
heard in an informal conference with an
FAA attorney. The FAA has determined
that this third option offers additional
fairness and process to those persons
who would be the subject of an order
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46965
issued under § 13.20. In addition, since
this opportunity is already available to
persons subject to certificate actions
under § 13.19 and civil penalty actions
under §§ 13.16 and 13.18, it makes
sense to add it to § 13.20 for consistency
and fairness.
Through the mechanism of the
informal conference in these other
contexts, matters are sometimes
resolved or the issues are narrowed.
This results in conserving resources,
both for respondents and the FAA. The
FAA expects these benefits will also be
realized for orders issued under § 13.20
when the informal conference option is
selected.
This rule also amends paragraph (d)
of § 13.20 to provide for these informal
conferences. Paragraph (d) currently
allows a person who files a reply under
paragraph (c) to further request a
hearing in accordance with Subpart D of
part 13 as to any charges not dismissed
or not subject to a consent order. The
option to request a hearing is expanded
to include persons who requested an
informal conference.
Concurrent with the publication of
this rule, the FAA is publishing a final
rule entitled ‘‘Repair Stations.’’ One of
the main purposes of that rulemaking is
to amend the certificate application
section to provide the FAA with the
ability to deny an application for a
repair station certificate to an applicant
who previously held a repair station
certificate that was revoked or who
intends to use certain key management
personnel or other persons who could
exercise control over the repair station’s
operations and who had materially
contributed to the circumstances that
caused a previous repair station
revocation. That action is necessary to
provide the FAA with the authority to
deny a repair station certificate to an
applicant who has violated part 145
regulations to an extent that revocation
of the certificate was warranted or who
intends to use key decision makers who
materially contributed to a prior
revocation.
During the FAA’s internal review of
the Repair Stations final rule, the FAA
noted that commenters raised due
process issues with respect to how the
FAA would determine who these
persons were, how it would be
determined that they materially
contributed to a prior revocation, and
what process would be afforded them to
challenge such determinations. When
considering the commenters’ concerns,
the FAA noticed that, although FAA
certificate actions and civil penalty
actions provide for the opportunity for
an informal conference with an FAA
attorney, that option is not provided to
E:\FR\FM\12AUR1.SGM
12AUR1
46966
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 155 / Tuesday, August 12, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
persons who receive notice of a
proposed order under § 13.20. The FAA
believes that an amendment to part 13
is necessary to provide the informal
conference option to all persons subject
to an order issued under § 13.20. This
provides a measure of fairness to
affected persons, and because matters
are sometimes resolved or the issues
narrowed at the informal conference
stage, this amendment has the potential
to conserve resources for both
respondents and the FAA.
To respond to those concerns, the
FAA is adding a paragraph to the
‘‘denial authority’’ section (§ 145.51(f))
in the Repair Station Final Rule that
provides that those persons are subject
to an order under the procedures set
forth in § 13.20. That section provides
for notice and the opportunity for a
hearing under subpart D of part 13.
In addition, we are making a minor
clarifying change to paragraph (d). The
current rule provides that, if a person
files a reply, the person may request a
hearing as to any charges not dismissed
as a result of the agency’s consideration
of the reply. We are replacing the word
‘‘dismissed’’ with ‘‘withdrawn’’ because
it more accurately reflects the role of the
agency prior to a hearing. As provided
in § 13.20(f), it is the role of the Hearing
Officer at the close of the hearing to
either dismiss the notice or issue an
order. This change also aligns the
agency’s procedures in other
enforcement contexts, for example, in
civil penalty and certificate action
matters.
II. Summary of the Costs and Benefits
of the Final Rule
Changes to Federal regulations must
undergo several economic analyses.
First, Executive Order 12866 and
Executive Order 13563 direct that each
Federal agency shall propose or adopt a
regulation only upon a reasoned
determination that the benefits of the
intended regulation justify its costs.
Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354) requires
agencies to analyze the economic
impact of regulatory changes on small
entities. Third, the Trade Agreements
Act (Pub. L. 96–39) prohibits agencies
from setting standards that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States. In
developing U.S. standards, this Trade
Act requires agencies to consider
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis of
U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4) requires agencies to prepare a
written assessment of the costs, benefits,
and other effects of proposed or final
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:41 Aug 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
rules that include a Federal mandate
likely to result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more annually (adjusted
for inflation with base year of 1995).
This portion of the preamble
summarizes the FAA’s analysis of the
economic impacts of this final rule.
Department of Transportation Order
DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies and
procedures for simplification, analysis,
and review of regulations. If the
expected cost impact is so minimal that
a proposed or final rule does not
warrant a full evaluation, this order
permits that a statement to that effect
and the basis for it to be included in the
preamble if a full regulatory evaluation
of the cost and benefits is not prepared.
Such a determination has been made for
this final rule. The reasoning for this
determination follows:
The amendment to § 13.20 allows for
informal conference with FAA Counsel
for those persons subject to orders of
compliance, cease and desist orders,
orders of denial, and other orders. This
amendment parallels due process
already afforded to persons of other
enforcement actions (i.e. § 13.16 and
§ 13.18—civil penalty actions, and
§ 13.19—certificate actions). Since the
amendment provides voluntary
opportunity for issues to be resolved, or
at least narrowed, prior to a formal
hearing, a positive net benefit is
realized.
Since the expected outcome will be a
minimal impact with positive net
benefits, a regulatory evaluation was not
prepared.
The FAA has, therefore, determined
that this final rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as defined in section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, and is not
‘‘significant’’ as defined in DOT’s
Regulatory Policies and Procedures.
III. Regulatory Notices and Analyses
A. Regulatory Flexibility Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(Pub. L. 96–354) (RFA) establishes ‘‘as a
principle of regulatory issuance that
agencies shall endeavor, consistent with
the objectives of the rule and of
applicable statutes, to fit regulatory and
informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and
governmental jurisdictions subject to
regulation.’’ To achieve this principle,
agencies are required to solicit and
consider flexible regulatory proposals
and to explain the rationale for their
actions to assure that such proposals are
given serious consideration.’’ The RFA
covers a wide-range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-for-
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
profit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to
determine whether a rule will have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. If
the agency determines that it will, the
agency must prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis as described in the
RFA. However, if an agency determines
that a rule is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
section 605(b) of the RFA provides that
the head of the agency may so certify
and a regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required. The certification must
include a statement providing the
factual basis for this determination, and
the reasoning should be clear.
This final rule provides a positive net
benefit to persons subject to orders the
opportunity to have informal conference
with FAA Counsel prior to a formal
hearing. Thus, this rule affects persons,
not small entities.
If an agency determines that a
rulemaking will not result in a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, the
head of the agency may so certify under
section 605(b) of the RFA. Therefore, as
provided in section 605(b), the head of
the FAA certifies that this rulemaking
will not result in a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
B. International Trade Impact
Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979
(Pub. L. 96–39), as amended by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub.
L. 103–465), prohibits Federal agencies
from establishing standards or engaging
in related activities that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States.
Pursuant to these Acts, the
establishment of standards is not
considered an unnecessary obstacle to
the foreign commerce of the United
States, so long as the standard has a
legitimate domestic objective, such as
the protection of safety, and does not
operate in a manner that excludes
imports that meet this objective. The
statute also requires consideration of
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for
U.S. standards. The FAA has assessed
the potential effect of this final rule and
determined that it offers the same
positive net benefit to all persons
regardless of nationality and thus has a
neutral trade impact.
E:\FR\FM\12AUR1.SGM
12AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 155 / Tuesday, August 12, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
C. Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4)
requires each Federal agency to prepare
a written statement assessing the effects
of any Federal mandate in a proposed or
final agency rule that may result in an
expenditure of $100 million or more (in
1995 dollars) in any one year by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector; such
a mandate is deemed to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action.’’ The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of $151
million in lieu of $100 million. This
final rule does not contain such a
mandate; therefore, the requirements of
Title II of the Act do not apply.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires that the
FAA consider the impact of paperwork
and other information collection
burdens imposed on the public. The
FAA has determined that there is no
new requirement for information
collection associated with this final
rule.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
E. International Compatibility and
Cooperation
(1) In keeping with U.S. obligations
under the Convention on International
Civil Aviation, it is FAA policy to
conform to International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) Standards and
Recommended Practices to the
maximum extent practicable. The FAA
has reviewed the corresponding ICAO
Standards and Recommended Practices
and has identified no differences with
these regulations.
(2) Executive Order 13609, Promoting
International Regulatory Cooperation,
promotes international regulatory
cooperation to meet shared challenges
involving health, safety, labor, security,
environmental, and other issues and to
reduce, eliminate, or prevent
unnecessary differences in regulatory
requirements. The FAA has analyzed
this action under the policies and
agency responsibilities of Executive
Order 13609, and has determined that
this action would have no effect on
international regulatory cooperation.
F. Environmental Analysis
FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA
actions that are categorically excluded
from preparation of an environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act in the
absence of extraordinary circumstances.
The FAA has determined this
rulemaking action qualifies for the
categorical exclusion identified in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:41 Aug 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
46967
Chapter 3, paragraph 312d and involves
no extraordinary circumstances.
C. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
IV. Executive Order Determinations
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of
1996 requires FAA to comply with
small entity requests for information or
advice about compliance with statutes
and regulations within its jurisdiction.
A small entity with questions regarding
this document, may contact its local
FAA official, or the person listed under
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
heading at the beginning of the
preamble. To find out more about
SBREFA on the Internet, visit https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/
rulemaking/sbre_act/.
A. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The FAA has analyzed this final rule
under the principles and criteria of
Executive Order 13132, Federalism. The
agency determined that this action will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, or the relationship between
the Federal Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, and, therefore,
does not have Federalism implications.
B. Executive Order 13211, Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 13
The FAA analyzed this final rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). The
agency has determined that it is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under the
executive order and it is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
The Amendment
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air transportation,
Hazardous materials transportation,
Investigations, Law enforcement,
Penalties.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation amends Chapter I of
Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
V. How To Obtain Additional
Information
PART 13—INVESTIGATIVE AND
ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES
A. Rulemaking Documents
■
An electronic copy of a rulemaking
document may be obtained by using the
Internet—
1. Search the Federal eRulemaking
Portal (https://www.regulations.gov);
2. Visit the FAA’s Regulations and
Policies Web page at https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/ or
3. Access the Government Printing
Office’s Web page at: https://
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/.
Copies may also be obtained by
sending a request (identified by notice,
amendment, or docket number of this
rulemaking) to the Federal Aviation
Administration, Office of Rulemaking,
ARM–1, 800 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by
calling (202) 267–9680.
B. Comments Submitted to the Docket
Comments received may be viewed by
going to https://www.regulations.gov and
following the online instructions to
search the docket number for this
action. Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of the FAA’s dockets
by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1. Revise the authority citation for part
13 to read as follows:
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 6002; 28 U.S.C. 2461
(note); 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 5121–5128, 40113–
40114, 44103–44106, 44701–44703, 44709–
44710, 44713, 46101–46111, 46301, 46302
(for a violation of 49 U.S.C. 46504), 46304–
46316, 46318, 46501–46502, 46504–46507,
47106, 47107, 47111, 47122, 47306, 47531–
47532; 49 CFR 1.47.
2. Amend § 13.20 by revising
paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as follows:
■
13.20 Orders of compliance, cease and
desist orders, orders of denial, and other
orders
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Within 30 days after service of the
notice, the person subject to the order
may’’
(1) Request an opportunity to be heard
in an informal conference with an FAA
attorney;
(2) Reply in writing; or
(3) Request a hearing in accordance
with subpart D of this part.
(d) If an informal conference is held
or a reply is filed, as to any charges not
withdrawn or not subject to a consent
order, the person subject to the order
may, within 10 days after receipt of
notice that the remaining charges are
not withdrawn, request a hearing in
accordance with subpart D of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\12AUR1.SGM
12AUR1
46968
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 155 / Tuesday, August 12, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Issued under authority of 49 U.S.C. 106
and 44701 in Washington, DC, on July 17,
2014.
Michael P. Huerta,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014–18294 Filed 8–11–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0490; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–133–AD; Amendment
39–17926; AD 2014–16–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
Examining the AD Docket
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–1A11
(CL–600) airplanes. This AD requires
revising the airplane flight manual to
prohibit thrust reverser operation, and
repetitive detailed inspections of both
engine thrust reversers for cracks and
modification if necessary. The
modification of the thrust reversers is
also an optional terminating action for
the repetitive inspections. This AD was
prompted by reports of partial
deployment of an engine thrust reverser
in-flight caused by a failure of the
translating sleeve at the thrust reverser
attachment points. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct cracks of the
translating sleeve at the thrust reverser
actuator attachment points, which could
result in deployment or dislodgement of
an engine thrust reverser in-flight and
subsequent reduced control of the
airplane.
SUMMARY:
This AD becomes effective
August 12, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of August 12, 2014.
We must receive comments on this
AD by September 26, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:41 Aug 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400
ˆ
´
Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514–855–
5000; fax 514–855–7401; email thd.crj@
aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://
www.bombardier.com. You may view
this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
0490; or in person at the Docket
Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems
Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7303; fax
516–794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Emergency Airworthiness Directive CF–
2014–19, dated June 20, 2014 (referred
to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information,
or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Bombardier, Inc.
Model CL–600–1A11 (CL–600)
airplanes. The MCAI states:
There have been two reported incidents of
partial deployment of an engine thrust
reverser in-flight, caused by a failure of the
translating sleeve at the thrust reverser
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
actuator attachment points. Inspection of the
same area on some other thrust reversers
revealed cracks emanating from the holes
under the nut plates.
In both incidents, the affected aeroplane
landed safely without any noticeable
controllability issues, however structural
failure of thrust reverser actuator attachment
points resulting in thrust reverser
deployment or dislodgment in flight [and
subsequent reduced control of the airplane]
is a safety hazard warranting an immediate
mitigating action.
To help in mitigating any immediate safety
hazard, Bombardier Inc. has revised the
Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM) through
Temporary Revisions (TR) 600/29, 600/30,
600–1/24 and 600–1/26, to prohibit the thrust
reverser operation on affected aeroplanes.
Additionally, as an interim corrective action,
Bombardier Inc. has issued alert service
bulletin (ASB) A600–0769 requiring an
inspection and/or a mechanical lock out of
the thrust reverser to prevent it from moving
out of forward thrust mode.
This [Canadian] AD is issued to mandate
the incorporation of revised AFM procedures
per TR 600/29, 600/30, 600–1/24 and 600–1/
26 and compliance with ASB A600–0769 for
all affected CL–600–1A11 aeroplanes.
Required actions also include repetitive
detailed inspections (including a
borescope inspection) of both engine
thrust reversers for cracks, and
modifying the thrust reversers if
necessary. Modifying the thrust
reversers terminates the detailed
inspections. You may examine the
MCAI on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
0490.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier, Inc. has issued the
following service information. The
actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the
MCAI.
• Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A600–0769, Revision 01, dated June 26,
2014.
• Canadair Temporary Revision (TR)
600/29, dated June 20, 2014, to the
Canadair CL–600–1A11 Airplane Flight
Manual (AFM).
• Canadair TR 600/30, dated June 6,
2014, to the Canadair CL–600–1A11
AFM.
• Canadair TR 600–1/24, dated June
20, 2014, to the Canadair CL–600–1A11
AFM (Winglets) including Erratum,
Publication No. PSP 600–1AFM (US),
TR No. 600–1/24, June 20, 2014.
• Canadair TR 600–1/26, dated June
6, 2014, to the Canadair CL–600–1A11
AFM (Winglets).
E:\FR\FM\12AUR1.SGM
12AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46964-46968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18294]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 13
[Docket No.: FAA-2014-0505; Amdt. No. 13-36]
RIN 2120-AK43
Orders of Compliance, Cease and Desist Orders, Orders of Denial,
and Other Orders
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Immediate final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rulemaking provides the opportunity for an informal
conference with an FAA attorney before an order is issued under the
FAA's regulation covering orders other than certificate action and
civil penalty orders. This change is necessary to provide additional
fairness and process to those persons who are subject to such an order,
and is consistent with the process available in other enforcement
actions. These conferences may result in either a resolution of the
matter or a narrowing of the issues, thereby conserving resources for
respondents and the FAA.
DATES: Effective October 14, 2014.
Submit comments on or before September 11, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number, FAA-2014-0505
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical or legal questions
concerning this action, contact Edmund Averman, Office of the Chief
Counsel (AGC-210), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-3147; email
Ed.Averman@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Good Cause for Immediate Adoption
Section 553(b)(3)(A) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553) authorizes agencies to dispense with notice and comment
procedures for rules when the agency for ``good cause'' finds that
those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest.'' Under this section, an agency, upon finding good
cause, may issue a final rule without seeking comment prior to the
rulemaking.
The FAA finds that notice and public comment to this immediately
adopted final rule are impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the
public interest. This rulemaking provides the opportunity for an
informal conference with an FAA attorney before an order is issued
under Sec. 13.20. Since this change provides additional fairness and
process to those persons who are subject to such an order, this
amendment should not adversely impact those covered by an order. In
fact, these conferences may result in a resolution of the matter or, in
some cases, a narrowing of the issues, thereby conserving resources for
respondents and the FAA. Finally, these conferences are optional.
[[Page 46965]]
Therefore, the FAA has determined that notice and public comment
are unnecessary.
Comments Invited
For the reasons noted above, the FAA is adopting this final rule
without prior notice and public comment. The Regulatory Policies and
Procedures of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 1134;
February 26, 1979), provide that, to the maximum extent possible,
operating administrations for the DOT should provide an opportunity for
public comment on regulations issued without prior notice.
The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. The agency
also invites comments relating to the economic, environmental, energy,
or federalism impacts that might result from adopting the changes. The
most helpful comments reference a specific portion of this rule,
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting
data. To ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, please
send only one copy of written comments, or, if you are filing comments
electronically, please submit your comments only one time.
The FAA will file in the docket all comments we receive, as well as
a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this rulemaking. Once the comment period closes, the FAA
will review and dispose of the comments filed in the rulemaking docket.
Because this is a final rule, the FAA will publish a disposition of
comments in the Federal Register. Based on the comments received, the
FAA will state whether it has decided that (i) no action is necessary
other than publishing the disposition of comments in the Federal
Register, or (ii) the FAA should prepare a revised final rule.
Proprietary or Confidential Business Information
Do not file in the docket information that you consider to be
proprietary or confidential business information. Send or deliver this
information directly to the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. Mark the information that
is considered proprietary or confidential. If the information is on a
disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM and also
identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific
information that is proprietary or confidential.
Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), when the FAA is aware of proprietary
information filed with a comment, the agency does not place it in the
docket. The FAA holds it in a separate file to which the public does
not have access, and the agency places a note in the docket that it has
received it. If the FAA receives a request to examine or copy this
information, the FAA treats it as any other request under the Freedom
of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. The FAA processes such a request
under the DOT procedures found in 49 CFR part 7.
Authority for this Rulemaking
The FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing
regulations required in the interest of safety for the design and
performance of aircraft; regulations and minimum standards in the
interest of safety for inspecting, servicing, and overhauling aircraft;
and regulations for other practices, methods, and procedures the
Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce.
I. Discussion of the Final Rule
Section 13.20 of 14 CFR part 13 (Orders of compliance, cease and
desist orders, orders of denial, and other orders) applies to a variety
of orders issued by the Administrator to carry out the provisions of
the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, the Hazardous Materials
Transportation Act, the Airport and Airway Development Act of 1970, and
the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, or the Airport and
Airway Improvement Act of 1982 as amended by the Airport and Airway
Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1987. This section does not apply
to orders issued under the authority of 49 U.S.C. 46301 (assessing
civil penalties) or 49 U.S.C. 44709 (amendments, modifications,
suspensions, and revocations of certain certificates).
Paragraph (c) of Sec. 13.20 allows, within 30 days after service
of the notice, a person subject to an order to reply in writing or
request a hearing in accordance with subpart D of part 13. This rule
amends that paragraph to add a third option--an opportunity to be heard
in an informal conference with an FAA attorney. The FAA has determined
that this third option offers additional fairness and process to those
persons who would be the subject of an order issued under Sec. 13.20.
In addition, since this opportunity is already available to persons
subject to certificate actions under Sec. 13.19 and civil penalty
actions under Sec. Sec. 13.16 and 13.18, it makes sense to add it to
Sec. 13.20 for consistency and fairness.
Through the mechanism of the informal conference in these other
contexts, matters are sometimes resolved or the issues are narrowed.
This results in conserving resources, both for respondents and the FAA.
The FAA expects these benefits will also be realized for orders issued
under Sec. 13.20 when the informal conference option is selected.
This rule also amends paragraph (d) of Sec. 13.20 to provide for
these informal conferences. Paragraph (d) currently allows a person who
files a reply under paragraph (c) to further request a hearing in
accordance with Subpart D of part 13 as to any charges not dismissed or
not subject to a consent order. The option to request a hearing is
expanded to include persons who requested an informal conference.
Concurrent with the publication of this rule, the FAA is publishing
a final rule entitled ``Repair Stations.'' One of the main purposes of
that rulemaking is to amend the certificate application section to
provide the FAA with the ability to deny an application for a repair
station certificate to an applicant who previously held a repair
station certificate that was revoked or who intends to use certain key
management personnel or other persons who could exercise control over
the repair station's operations and who had materially contributed to
the circumstances that caused a previous repair station revocation.
That action is necessary to provide the FAA with the authority to deny
a repair station certificate to an applicant who has violated part 145
regulations to an extent that revocation of the certificate was
warranted or who intends to use key decision makers who materially
contributed to a prior revocation.
During the FAA's internal review of the Repair Stations final rule,
the FAA noted that commenters raised due process issues with respect to
how the FAA would determine who these persons were, how it would be
determined that they materially contributed to a prior revocation, and
what process would be afforded them to challenge such determinations.
When considering the commenters' concerns, the FAA noticed that,
although FAA certificate actions and civil penalty actions provide for
the opportunity for an informal conference with an FAA attorney, that
option is not provided to
[[Page 46966]]
persons who receive notice of a proposed order under Sec. 13.20. The
FAA believes that an amendment to part 13 is necessary to provide the
informal conference option to all persons subject to an order issued
under Sec. 13.20. This provides a measure of fairness to affected
persons, and because matters are sometimes resolved or the issues
narrowed at the informal conference stage, this amendment has the
potential to conserve resources for both respondents and the FAA.
To respond to those concerns, the FAA is adding a paragraph to the
``denial authority'' section (Sec. 145.51(f)) in the Repair Station
Final Rule that provides that those persons are subject to an order
under the procedures set forth in Sec. 13.20. That section provides
for notice and the opportunity for a hearing under subpart D of part
13.
In addition, we are making a minor clarifying change to paragraph
(d). The current rule provides that, if a person files a reply, the
person may request a hearing as to any charges not dismissed as a
result of the agency's consideration of the reply. We are replacing the
word ``dismissed'' with ``withdrawn'' because it more accurately
reflects the role of the agency prior to a hearing. As provided in
Sec. 13.20(f), it is the role of the Hearing Officer at the close of
the hearing to either dismiss the notice or issue an order. This change
also aligns the agency's procedures in other enforcement contexts, for
example, in civil penalty and certificate action matters.
II. Summary of the Costs and Benefits of the Final Rule
Changes to Federal regulations must undergo several economic
analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563 direct
that each Federal agency shall propose or adopt a regulation only upon
a reasoned determination that the benefits of the intended regulation
justify its costs. Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub.
L. 96-354) requires agencies to analyze the economic impact of
regulatory changes on small entities. Third, the Trade Agreements Act
(Pub. L. 96-39) prohibits agencies from setting standards that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States. In
developing U.S. standards, this Trade Act requires agencies to consider
international standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis
of U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104-4) requires agencies to prepare a written assessment of
the costs, benefits, and other effects of proposed or final rules that
include a Federal mandate likely to result in the expenditure by State,
local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million or more annually (adjusted for inflation with
base year of 1995). This portion of the preamble summarizes the FAA's
analysis of the economic impacts of this final rule.
Department of Transportation Order DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies
and procedures for simplification, analysis, and review of regulations.
If the expected cost impact is so minimal that a proposed or final rule
does not warrant a full evaluation, this order permits that a statement
to that effect and the basis for it to be included in the preamble if a
full regulatory evaluation of the cost and benefits is not prepared.
Such a determination has been made for this final rule. The reasoning
for this determination follows:
The amendment to Sec. 13.20 allows for informal conference with
FAA Counsel for those persons subject to orders of compliance, cease
and desist orders, orders of denial, and other orders. This amendment
parallels due process already afforded to persons of other enforcement
actions (i.e. Sec. 13.16 and Sec. 13.18--civil penalty actions, and
Sec. 13.19--certificate actions). Since the amendment provides
voluntary opportunity for issues to be resolved, or at least narrowed,
prior to a formal hearing, a positive net benefit is realized.
Since the expected outcome will be a minimal impact with positive
net benefits, a regulatory evaluation was not prepared.
The FAA has, therefore, determined that this final rule is not a
``significant regulatory action'' as defined in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, and is not ``significant'' as defined in DOT's
Regulatory Policies and Procedures.
III. Regulatory Notices and Analyses
A. Regulatory Flexibility Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) (RFA)
establishes ``as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall
endeavor, consistent with the objectives of the rule and of applicable
statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to regulation.'' To achieve this principle, agencies are
required to solicit and consider flexible regulatory proposals and to
explain the rationale for their actions to assure that such proposals
are given serious consideration.'' The RFA covers a wide-range of small
entities, including small businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and
small governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a rule will
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. If the agency determines that it will, the agency must
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis as described in the RFA.
However, if an agency determines that a rule is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
section 605(b) of the RFA provides that the head of the agency may so
certify and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. The
certification must include a statement providing the factual basis for
this determination, and the reasoning should be clear.
This final rule provides a positive net benefit to persons subject
to orders the opportunity to have informal conference with FAA Counsel
prior to a formal hearing. Thus, this rule affects persons, not small
entities.
If an agency determines that a rulemaking will not result in a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
the head of the agency may so certify under section 605(b) of the RFA.
Therefore, as provided in section 605(b), the head of the FAA certifies
that this rulemaking will not result in a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.
B. International Trade Impact Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as amended by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465), prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing standards or engaging in related activities
that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United
States. Pursuant to these Acts, the establishment of standards is not
considered an unnecessary obstacle to the foreign commerce of the
United States, so long as the standard has a legitimate domestic
objective, such as the protection of safety, and does not operate in a
manner that excludes imports that meet this objective. The statute also
requires consideration of international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S. standards. The FAA has
assessed the potential effect of this final rule and determined that it
offers the same positive net benefit to all persons regardless of
nationality and thus has a neutral trade impact.
[[Page 46967]]
C. Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires each Federal agency to prepare a written statement
assessing the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final
agency rule that may result in an expenditure of $100 million or more
(in 1995 dollars) in any one year by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector; such a mandate
is deemed to be a ``significant regulatory action.'' The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of $151 million in lieu of $100
million. This final rule does not contain such a mandate; therefore,
the requirements of Title II of the Act do not apply.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires
that the FAA consider the impact of paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the public. The FAA has determined that
there is no new requirement for information collection associated with
this final rule.
E. International Compatibility and Cooperation
(1) In keeping with U.S. obligations under the Convention on
International Civil Aviation, it is FAA policy to conform to
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standards and
Recommended Practices to the maximum extent practicable. The FAA has
reviewed the corresponding ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices and
has identified no differences with these regulations.
(2) Executive Order 13609, Promoting International Regulatory
Cooperation, promotes international regulatory cooperation to meet
shared challenges involving health, safety, labor, security,
environmental, and other issues and to reduce, eliminate, or prevent
unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements. The FAA has
analyzed this action under the policies and agency responsibilities of
Executive Order 13609, and has determined that this action would have
no effect on international regulatory cooperation.
F. Environmental Analysis
FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA actions that are categorically
excluded from preparation of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy
Act in the absence of extraordinary circumstances. The FAA has
determined this rulemaking action qualifies for the categorical
exclusion identified in Chapter 3, paragraph 312d and involves no
extraordinary circumstances.
IV. Executive Order Determinations
A. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The FAA has analyzed this final rule under the principles and
criteria of Executive Order 13132, Federalism. The agency determined
that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on the
States, or the relationship between the Federal Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, and, therefore, does not have Federalism
implications.
B. Executive Order 13211, Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
The FAA analyzed this final rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). The agency has determined that it
is not a ``significant energy action'' under the executive order and it
is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.
V. How To Obtain Additional Information
A. Rulemaking Documents
An electronic copy of a rulemaking document may be obtained by
using the Internet--
1. Search the Federal eRulemaking Portal (https://www.regulations.gov);
2. Visit the FAA's Regulations and Policies Web page at https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/ or
3. Access the Government Printing Office's Web page at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/.
Copies may also be obtained by sending a request (identified by
notice, amendment, or docket number of this rulemaking) to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling (202) 267-9680.
B. Comments Submitted to the Docket
Comments received may be viewed by going to https://www.regulations.gov and following the online instructions to search the
docket number for this action. Anyone is able to search the electronic
form of all comments received into any of the FAA's dockets by the name
of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of
1996 requires FAA to comply with small entity requests for information
or advice about compliance with statutes and regulations within its
jurisdiction. A small entity with questions regarding this document,
may contact its local FAA official, or the person listed under the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT heading at the beginning of the preamble.
To find out more about SBREFA on the Internet, visit https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking/sbre_act/.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 13
Administrative practice and procedure, Air transportation,
Hazardous materials transportation, Investigations, Law enforcement,
Penalties.
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation amends
Chapter I of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 13--INVESTIGATIVE AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES
0
1. Revise the authority citation for part 13 to read as follows:
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 6002; 28 U.S.C. 2461 (note); 49 U.S.C.
106(g), 5121-5128, 40113-40114, 44103-44106, 44701-44703, 44709-
44710, 44713, 46101-46111, 46301, 46302 (for a violation of 49
U.S.C. 46504), 46304-46316, 46318, 46501-46502, 46504-46507, 47106,
47107, 47111, 47122, 47306, 47531-47532; 49 CFR 1.47.
0
2. Amend Sec. 13.20 by revising paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as
follows:
13.20 Orders of compliance, cease and desist orders, orders of
denial, and other orders
* * * * *
(c) Within 30 days after service of the notice, the person subject
to the order may''
(1) Request an opportunity to be heard in an informal conference
with an FAA attorney;
(2) Reply in writing; or
(3) Request a hearing in accordance with subpart D of this part.
(d) If an informal conference is held or a reply is filed, as to
any charges not withdrawn or not subject to a consent order, the person
subject to the order may, within 10 days after receipt of notice that
the remaining charges are not withdrawn, request a hearing in
accordance with subpart D of this part.
* * * * *
[[Page 46968]]
Issued under authority of 49 U.S.C. 106 and 44701 in Washington,
DC, on July 17, 2014.
Michael P. Huerta,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-18294 Filed 8-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P