Medicare Program; Evaluation Criteria and Standards for Quality Improvement Networks Quality Improvement Program Contracts [Base and Task Order(s)], 46830-46835 [2014-18901]
Download as PDF
46830
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 154 / Monday, August 11, 2014 / Notices
specific request that describes project
purpose, use, and methodology.
CDC plans to request OMB approval
to extend the MTTCA clearance, with
changes, for three years. The Revision
information collection request (ICR) will
propose further increases in the
annualized estimated number of
respondents and the annualized
estimated burden hours. These increases
are needed to support CDC’s planned
information collections and to
accommodate additional needs that CDC
may identify during the next three
years. For example, the MTTCA generic
clearance may be used to facilitate the
development of tobacco-related health
communications of interest for CDC’s
collaborative efforts with other federal
partners including, but not limited to,
the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA), the Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA), the National Institutes of
Health (NIH), and the National Cancer
Institute (NCI). At this time the MTTCA
clearance is expected to be sufficient to
test tobacco related messages developed
by CDC. However, the MTTCA
clearance should not replace the need
for additional generic clearance
Finally, there may be a need to test
prevention and cessation messages
related to products that are not currently
regulated, including non-combustible
tobacco products (electronic nicotine
delivery systems such as electronic
cigarettes or e-cigarettes) and some
combustible products (such as cigars/
little cigars and cigarillos). In the event
that the FDA receives authority to
regulate these products and decides to
do a campaign about them, CDC will
work closely with FDA to avoid
duplication. Additionally, CDC will
share with FDA the findings from any
formative work related to the youth
audience.
CDC will continue to use the MTTCA
clearance to develop and test messages
and materials for current and future
phases of the ACA-funded media
campaign, OSH’s ongoing programmatic
initiatives including, but not limited to,
the Media Campaign Resource Center,
reports from the Office of the Surgeon
General, and other communication
efforts and materials. Participation is
voluntary and there are no costs to
respondents other than their time.
mechanisms HHS and other federal
partners may need to test tobacco
messages related to their campaigns and
initiatives.
CDC’s revised MTTCA clearance will
also describe expansion of the target
audience(s) that may be involved in
message testing, such as youth ages 13–
17 years. The 2014 Surgeon General’s
Report concluded that there is already
sufficient evidence to caution youth
against the use of electronic cigarettes.
Tobacco and electronic cigarette
advertising and promotional activities
can prompt smoking initiation,
especially among youth. Recent studies
have found that 90.7% of middle school
students and 92.9% of high school
students have been exposed to protobacco advertisements in stores,
magazines and on the internet. Media
campaigns have been shown to be
effective as part of a comprehensive
tobacco control program to decrease the
initiation of tobacco use among youths
and young adults. A coordinated series
of health message testing activities will
be required to support future
development of effective, audiencespecific and channel-specific messages
for CDC’s ACA-funded campaign.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total burden
(in hours)
Type of respondents
Form name
General Public and Special Populations.
Screening and Recruitment .................................
20,000
1
2/60
667
In-depth Interviews (In Person, telephone, etc.)
Focus Groups (In Person) ...................................
Focus Groups (Online) ........................................
Short Surveys/information needed to screen individuals being considered for inclusion in
campaign ads (Online, Bulletin Board, etc.).
Medium Surveys (Online) ....................................
In-depth Surveys (Online) ...................................
96
160
120
9,800
1
1
1
1
1
1.5
1
10/60
96
240
120
1,633
9,940
4,100
1
1
25/60
1
4,142
4,100
..............................................................................
44,216
........................
........................
10,998
Total ........................
Leroy Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the
Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[FR Doc. 2014–18902 Filed 8–8–14; 8:45 am]
[CMS–3300–NC]
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
RIN 0938–ZB15
Medicare Program; Evaluation Criteria
and Standards for Quality
Improvement Networks Quality
Improvement Program Contracts [Base
and Task Order(s)]
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Aug 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Notice with comment period.
This notice with comment
period describes the general criteria we
intend to use to evaluate the
effectiveness and efficiency of the
Quality Innovation Network (QIN)
Quality Improvement Organizations
(QIOs) that will enter into contracts
with CMS under the Quality Innovation
Network Quality Improvement
Organizations (Solicitation Number:
HHSM–500–2014–RFP–QIN–QIO)
Statement of Work (SOW) on August 1,
2014. The evaluation of a QIN–QIO’s
performance related to their SOW will
be based on evaluation criteria specified
for the tasks and subtasks set forth in
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 154 / Monday, August 11, 2014 / Notices
Sections C.5, G.22 and G.29 of the QIN–
QIO Base Contract and Attachment
J–1(b) of the Base Contract; Attachment
J–1 is QIN–QIO Task Order No. 001.
DATES: Effective Date: August 1, 2014 to
July 31, 2019 for the QIN–QIO contract.
Comment Date: To be assured
consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses
provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on
September 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, refer to file
code CMS–3300–NC. Because of staff
and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the ‘‘Submit a comment’’ instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services,
Attention: CMS–3300–NC,
P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services,
Attention: CMS–3300–NC,
Mail Stop C4–26–05,
7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. Alternatively,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments only to the
following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services,
Room 445–G, Hubert H. Humphrey
Building,
200 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20201
(Because access to the interior of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not
readily available to persons without
Federal government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave
their comments in the CMS drop slots
located in the main lobby of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Aug 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
building. A stamp-in clock is available
for persons wishing to retain a proof of
filing by stamping in and retaining an
extra copy of the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services,
7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address, call
telephone number (410) 786–9994 in
advance to schedule your arrival with
one of our staff members. Comments
erroneously mailed to the addresses
indicated as appropriate for hand or
courier delivery may be delayed and
received after the comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alfreda Staton, (410) 786–4194.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view
public comments.
Comments received timely will also
be available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication
of a document, at the headquarters of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday
through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–743–3951.
I. Background
Section 1153(h)(2) of the Social
Security Act (the Act) requires the
Secretary of the Department of Health
and Human Services (the Secretary) to
publish in the Federal Register the
general criteria and standards that will
be used to evaluate the effective and
efficient performance of contract
obligations by the Quality Improvement
Organizations (QIOs), and to provide the
opportunity for public comment with
respect to these criteria and standards.
This notice describes the general criteria
that will be used to evaluate
performance of the Quality Innovation
Network (QIN)—QIOs under the QIN–
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46831
QIO 11th Statement of Work (SOW)
contract beginning August 1, 2014.
II. Provisions of the Notice With
Comment Period
The QIN–QIO contract supports our
efforts to improve health and healthcare
for all Medicare beneficiaries, including
those who are eligible for both the
Medicare and Medicaid programs, and
promote quality of care to ensure the
right care at the right time, every time.
The QIN–QIO SOW is structured so that
QIN–QIOs perform under the base
contract and task orders. Task Order 001
outlines several tasks for the QIN–QIOs
as well as a mechanism for the proposal
and adoption of additional tasks known
as ‘‘Special Innovation Projects’’ (SIPs).
Specifically, SIPs are initiatives, efforts,
and programs rooted in the QIN–QIO
area. SIPs are recommended to the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS), through the QIN–QIO,
by community advocates, organizers,
and groups engaged with local health
issues. The SIP is intended to either
address a health issue the community
finds acute but is less visible to highlevel federal analytics or to respond to
health issues, local or national, that are
discovered during the course of the
contract. In addition to the SIPs, QIOs
are responsible for completing the
requirements for the following Tasks as
part of Task Order 001:
• Improving Cardiac Health and
Reducing Cardiac Healthcare
Disparities;
• Reducing Disparities in Diabetes
Care;
• Improving Prevention Coordination
through Meaningful Use of Health
Information Technology (HIT) and
Collaborating with Regional Extension
Centers (RECs);
• Reducing Healthcare-Associated
Infections in Hospitals;
• Reducing Healthcare-Acquired
Conditions in Nursing Homes;
• Improving Coordination of Care;
• Quality Improvement through
Value-Based Payment, Quality
Reporting, and the Physician Feedback
Reporting Program; and
• Quality Improvement Initiatives.
(Detailed information for each Task may
be found in sections B.1 through E.1 in
Attachment J.1 posted on December 5,
2013 of Solicitation Number: HHSM–
500–2014–RFP–QIN–QIO, posted at the
https://www.fedbizopps.gov Web site:
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=
opportunity&mode=form&id=
dff522bababb 6b9859bb783 c08db6074.)
References in this Notice to
‘‘Attachments’’ are to attachments of the
RFP and SOW.
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
46832
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 154 / Monday, August 11, 2014 / Notices
QIN–QIO Tasks
Improving Cardiac Health and Reducing
Cardiac Healthcare Disparities (See
Section B.1 of Attachment J.1, QIN–QIO
Task Order No. 001)
The purpose of this task is for the
QIN–QIOs to work with providers and
beneficiaries in collaboration with key
partners and stakeholders, including
RECs, to implement evidence-based
practices to improve cardiovascular
health, reduce cardiovascular healthcare
disparities, and support the Department
of Health and Human Services’ Million
Hearts® initiative’s goal to prevent one
million heart attacks and strokes. The
Million Hearts® Web site is found at
www.millionhearts.hhs.gov. While the
QIN–QIO’s work targets Medicare
beneficiaries of all races and ethnicities,
the QIN–QIO shall also propose the
number of clinicians, practitioners, and
providers, (as defined in section 1861(u)
of the Act (42 U.S.C. 1395)), it will
recruit to voluntarily participate in this
initiative. Focus will be on those
clinicians and provider that provide
healthcare services to African American,
Hispanic, and other racial and ethnic
minority Medicare beneficiaries. Goals
and targets will be monitored for
improvement in promoting the use of
Aspirin therapy when appropriate;
Blood pressure (BP) control; Cholesterol
management; and Smoking assessment
and cessation (ABCS).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Reducing Disparities in Diabetes Care:
Everyone With Diabetes Counts (EDC)
(See Section B.2 in Attachment J.1,
QIN–QIO Task Order No. 001)
The purpose of this Task is to
improve the quality of the lives for
persons with diabetes, and to prevent or
lessen the severity of complications
resulting from diabetes. The QIN–QIOs
will promote diabetes self-management
education (DSME) for empowering
Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes to
take an active role in controlling their
disease and improve clinical outcomes.
The QIN–QIOs will work with
healthcare providers, practitioners,
certified diabetes educators, and
community health workers to cultivate
the knowledge and skills necessary to
improve the quality of the lives for
persons with diabetes. The QIN–QIOs
will also work with stakeholders on
preventing or lessening the severity of
complications resulting from diabetes
such as kidney failure, amputations,
loss of vision, heart failure, and stroke.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Aug 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
Improving Prevention Coordination
Through Meaningful Use of HIT and
Collaborating With Regional Extension
Centers (See Section B.4 in Attachment
J.1, QIN–QIO Task Order No. 001)
The purpose of this Task is to support
physician and other clinician practices
to improve care and outcomes for their
population of patients through
meaningful use of interoperable health
IT in collaboration with RECs. The QIN–
QIOs will collaborate with RECs to
improve the quality of care and
transitions in care through interoperable
health IT in connection with the
Medicare program. The QIN–QIOs will
provide targeted technical assistance to
Eligible Professionals (EP), Eligible
Hospitals (EH) and Critical Access
Hospitals (CAH) that are most
challenged to successfully meet the
requirements of the Medicare Electronic
Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs
and utilizing EHR functionality for
quality improvement.
Reducing Healthcare-Associated
Infections in Hospitals (See Section C.1
in Attachment J.1 of the QIN–QIO Task
Order)
The purpose of this Task is to
improve beneficiary safety by reducing
the incidence of patient harm in the
areas of healthcare-associated infections
(HAIs) in hospital settings. The QIN–
QIO will use evidence-based strategies
and data to decrease and prevent HAIs
in the hospital setting to improve
patient care. The QIO will work to
decrease Central Line-Associated
Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI),
Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract
Infection (CAUTI) and Clostridium
Difficile Infection (CDI) Standardized
Infection Ratios (SIRs) and improve
Urinary Catheter Utilization in hospital
acute care settings for Medicare
beneficiaries.
Reducing Healthcare-Acquired
Conditions in Nursing Homes (See
Section C.2 in Attachment J.1, QIN–QIO
Task Order No. 001)
The purpose of this Task is to
improve beneficiary safety by reducing
the incidence of healthcare-acquired
conditions in nursing home provider
settings. The QIN–QIO will improve the
quality of care for Medicare
beneficiaries in Nursing Homes by
achieving improvement in the
Collaborative Quality Measure
Composite Score composed of 13 NQFendorsed quality of care measures as
listed in Attachment J.1—Task Order
001, Task C.2. Appendix 4; decrease the
percentage of residents who received
antipsychotic medications; and improve
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
mobility of long-stay residents. The
QIN–QIO will work to support the
creation of National Nursing Home
Quality Care Collaboratives (NNHQCC)
to ‘‘instill quality and performance
improvement practices, eliminate
healthcare acquired conditions, and
improve resident satisfaction.’’ The
QIN–QIO will work with participating
nursing homes, beneficiaries,
beneficiary family members and/or
beneficiary advocates/representatives,
and in collaboration with key partners
and stakeholders to accomplish these
objectives.
Coordination of Care (See Section C.3 in
Attachment J.1,QIN–QIO Task Order
No. 001)
The purpose of this Task is to
improve hospital admission and/or
readmission rates, and adverse drug
event rates by improving effective
communication and the continuity and
coordination of patient care using
methods such as interoperable health
IT. The QIN–QIO will improve the
quality of care for Medicare
beneficiaries who transition among care
settings including home through a
comprehensive community effort. These
efforts aim to reduce readmissions
following hospitalization and to yield
sustainable and replicable strategies to
achieve high-value health care,
particularly for chronically ill and
disabled Medicare beneficiaries. The
QIN–QIOs will support the
development of community coalitions
for improving communication and the
coordination of clinical decisions.
Quality Improvement Through ValueBased Payment, Quality Reporting, and
the Physician Feedback Reporting
Program (See Section D.1 in Attachment
J.1, QIN–QIO Task Order No. 001)
The purpose of this Task is to
improve quality care to beneficiaries in
physician settings by supporting
provider use of and participation in the
CMS physician value modifier program
and coordinating community driven
projects that advance efforts to achieve
better care at lower costs. The QIN–
QIOs will improve healthcare by
identifying gaps and opportunities for
improvement in quality, efficiency, and
care coordination. The QIOs shall be
called upon to assist hospitals, PPSexempt Cancer Hospitals (PCHs),
Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities (IPFs),
Ambulatory Surgical Centers (ASCs)
and physicians (as defined in section
1861(r) of the Act) in improving the
quality and efficiency of care through
outreach and education about CMS’
hospital and physician value based
payment programs, quality reporting
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 154 / Monday, August 11, 2014 / Notices
programs, Physician Feedback
Reporting Program, and the use of the
quality and cost measure information
contained in the confidential quality
and resource use reports.
QIN–QIO-Proposed Projects That
Advance Efforts for Better Care at Lower
Cost (See Section D.2 in Attachment J.1,
QIN–QIO Task Order No. 001)
We will use SIPs to support QIN–
QIOs in their respective services areas to
work with communities to improve
healthcare quality and efficiencies.
Specifically, SIPs are initiatives, efforts,
and programs rooted in the QIN–QIO
area. SIPs are recommended to us,
through the QIN–QIO, by community
advocates, organizers, and groups
engaged with local health issues. The
SIP is intended to address health issues
that the community finds acute but is
less visible at a national-level.
Evaluation criteria and standards will be
developed for each SIP.
Quality Improvement Initiatives (See
Section E.1 in Attachment J.1, QIN–QIO
Task Order No. 001)
The purpose of this Task is to
improve the quality of health care for
Medicare beneficiaries by providing
technical assistance to providers and
practitioners. The QIN–QIO will
improve healthcare quality by assisting
providers and/or practitioners in
identifying the root cause of a concern,
developing a framework in which to
address the concern, and improving a
process or system based on their
analyses. A Quality Improvement
Initiative (QII) is any formal activity
designed to serve as a catalyst and
support for quality improvement that
uses proven methodologies to achieve
these improvements. The improvements
may relate to safety, healthcare, health
and value and involve providers,
practitioners, beneficiaries, and/or
communities. A QII may consist of
system-wide and/or non-system-wide
changes and may be based on a single,
confirmed concern or multiple
confirmed concerns. Additionally, the
QIN–QIO will collaborate with the
Beneficiary and Family Centered CareQIO to improve Beneficiary (‘‘Patient’’)
and Family Engagement in healthcare
quality improvement efforts and
actively supporting projects aimed at
shared decision-making with
beneficiaries, families, and caregivers
and families. QIIs may also be based
upon or responsive to referrals made by
other contractors in the QIO Program.
III. Evaluation of the Tasks
The QIN–QIO’s performance will be
evaluated based on achievement
associated with the Tasks in each
awarded Task Order and as described in
Sections C.5, G.22 and G.29 of the QIN–
QIO Base Contract and the QIN–QIO
Statement of Work (including
Attachments J.1 and other Attachments
for measures and targets).
If a QIN–QIO is not tasked to work on
a specific Task or an area under a Task,
46833
the QIN–QIO will not be evaluated
under that particular area. Any Special
Innovation Project that the QIN–QIO
may carry out will be evaluated
separately and will not be considered in
the overall performance evaluation
criteria.
We will conduct monitoring activities
throughout the course of the contract
and will act upon findings as necessary.
We will monitor, at least quarterly, the
QIN–QIO’s performance relative to
contract requirements and targets as
well as milestones and progress toward
successfully implementing plans and
programs for each of the individual
states/territories of the QIN–QIO’s
service area, as well as the aggregate, in
the Task Award.
Information used for these monitoring
purposes includes but is not limited to:
• Deliverables submitted by the QIN–
QIO to CMS in accordance with the
Schedule of Deliverables;
• Data for measures indicated in
Attachment J.1(b);
• Data from the QIN–QIO’s
Continuous Internal Quality
Improvement Program;
• Other data submitted by QIN–QIOs
as required by CMS;
• Additional information gathered by
email, telephone, video, or in-person
visits.
Plans and programs against which
progress will be monitored include but
are not limited to:
PLAN & PROGRAM MONITORING
Section(s)
Brief description
Base Contract .....................................................................
Task Order 001 ...................................................................
Base Contract .....................................................................
Task Order 001 ...................................................................
Base Contract .....................................................................
Base Contract .....................................................................
Base Contract .....................................................................
Base Contract .....................................................................
Base Contract .....................................................................
C.6.1.1 ..............................
A.1.1 .................................
C.6.1.2 ..............................
A.1.3 .................................
C.6.1.3 ..............................
C.6.4.2 ..............................
C.6.4.3 ..............................
C.6.4.4 ..............................
C.6.4.5 ..............................
Base Contract .....................................................................
Task Order 001 ...................................................................
Task Order 001 ...................................................................
All Task Orders from Task 001 forward .............................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Base contract or task order 001
C.6.4.6 ..............................
A.1.2 .................................
A.1.6 .................................
All Sections ......................
Comprehensive Strategic Plan.
Comprehensive Strategic Plan.
Integrated Communications Plan.
Integrated Communications Plan.
Task Order Work Plan.
Recruitment.
Provider and Practitioner Recruitment.
Beneficiary (‘‘Patient’’) and Family Engagement.
Partner and Stakeholder Recruitment and Collaboration.
Sustainability Plan.
Management Plan.
Continuous Internal Quality Improvement Program.
Task Order 001, Excellence in Operations and Quality
Improvement and all subsequent Task Orders as
specified.
QIN–QIOs shall cooperate with the
Contracting Officer Representative
(COR) on all our monitoring processes
and address any concerns identified by
the COR. We will take appropriate
contract action (for example, providing
warning for the need for adjustment,
instituting a formal correction plan,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Aug 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
terminating an activity, or
recommending early termination of a
contract because of failure to meet
contract timelines or performance as
specified in the contract). This means
that the QIO shall comply with the Base
Contract, all Task Orders, Schedules of
Deliverables, Evaluation Measures
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Tables, and any subsequent
modifications (including HCQIS
Memorandums) issued by CMS.
Additionally, there will be multiple
periods of evaluation under this
contract. The first evaluation will occur
at the end of the 12th month of the
contract. Subsequent evaluations will
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
46834
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 154 / Monday, August 11, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
occur at the end of the 24, 36, 48 and
54th months of the contract. The
evaluations will be based on the most
recent data available to us. The
performance results of the evaluation at
each evaluation period (that is, 12, 24,
36, 48 and 54th months) will be used,
in addition to ongoing monitoring
activities, to determine the QIO’s
performance on the overall contract.
Annual and 54th Month Evaluation
Annual and the 54th month contract
evaluation will determine if the QIN–
QIO has met the performance evaluation
criteria as specified in the Task areas of
the Base Contract. The annual and 54th
month evaluation criteria are found in
Section J, Attachment J.1(b), Evaluation
Measures Table of the QIN–QIO SOW.
Attachment J.1(b) includes the following
measures, by Task:
• B.1. Improving Cardiac Health
Æ Percentage of patients whose blood
pressure was adequately controlled.
Æ Percentage of patients who are
screened about tobacco use at least
one time within 24 months.
Æ Percentage of patients identified as
tobacco users who are provided
with cessation counseling
intervention.
• B.2. Everyone with Diabetes Counts
Æ Percentage of clinical outcome data
for Medicare beneficiaries who
complete DSME classes through
EDC. Clinical outcomes are: HbA1c,
Lipids, Eye Exam, Blood Pressure
and Weight.
Æ Percentage of physician practices
recruited to participate in EDC.
Æ Percentage of New Beneficiaries
Completing DSME.
• B.3. (Reserved)
• B.4. Meaningful Use of HIT and
Collaborating With RECs
Æ Percentage of recruited EPs, EHs
and CAHs using certified EHR
technology (CEHRT) with signed
agreements within each state or
territory.
Æ Percentage of recruited EPs, EHs
and CAHs using CEHRT receiving
technical assistance within each
state or territory.
Æ Percentage of recruited
practitioners/providers attending
QIO’s educational sessions and the
Learning and Action Network.
Æ Percentage of recruited EPs, EHs
and CAHs that received Technical
Assistance (TA) that meet EHR
Incentive Programs clinical quality
measures reporting requirements
post TA within each state or
territory.
Æ Percentage of recruited
practitioners/providers working to
establish an electronic connection
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Aug 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
•
•
•
•
with beneficiaries/family
representative.
C.1. Reducing Healthcare-Acquired
Infections (HAIs) in Hospitals
Æ CLABSI Standardized Infection
Ratio.
Æ CAUTI Standardized Infection
Ratio.
Æ Urinary Catheter Utilization Rate.
Æ CDI Standardized Infection Rate.
Æ Recruitment of non-ICU and ICU
units in acute care facilities to
participate in HAI projects.
C.2. Reducing Healthcare-Acquired
Conditions in Nursing Homes
Æ Rate of reduction in percentage of
residents who received
antipsychotic medications.
Æ Percentage of long-stay residents
with improved mobility.
Æ Percentage of One-Star Category
Target Number recruited for
Collaborative I.
Æ Sum of Percentages of One-Star
Category Target Number recruited
for Collaboratives I and II.
Æ Percentage of Recruitment Target
Number recruited for Collaborative
I.
Æ Sum of percentages of Recruitment
Target Number recruited for
Collaboratives I and II.
Æ NNHQCC Quality Composite
Measure Score.
C.3. Coordination of Care
Æ Percentage of interventions
implemented (for a minimum of 6
months) that show improvement
(for a minimum of 5 interventions
across the region annually).
Æ Percentage of 30-day readmissions
per 1,000 Fee-for-Service (FFS)
beneficiaries in region-wide
coalition.
Æ Percentage of admissions per 1,000
FFS beneficiaries in region-wide
coalition.
Æ Percentage of region-wide
readmissions per 1,000 FFS
beneficiaries.
Æ Percentage of adverse drug events
per 1,000 screened beneficiaries.
Æ Increased community tenure in
region-wide coalition. ‘‘Community
tenure’’ is defined as the number of
days beneficiaries spend in their
home setting.
D.1. Quality Improvement through
Physician Value-Based Modifiers
Æ Percentage of eligible physicians/
physician groups attending QIOconvened forums related to the
Value Modifier (VM) Program.
Æ Percentage of eligible physicians/
physician groups that demonstrate
improvement in quality-of-care
measures (per Quality and Resource
Use Reports) after receiving TA
from QIOs.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Æ Percentage of eligible ASCs that
demonstrate improvement in
quality-of-care measures (per
Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality
Reporting) after receiving TA from
QIOs.
Æ Percentage of eligible IPFs that
demonstrate improvement in
quality-of-care measures (per
Inpatient Psychiatric Facility
Quality Reporting) after receiving
TA from QIOs.
Æ Percentage of eligible CAHs that
demonstrate improvement in
quality-of-care measures (per
Inpatient Quality Reporting or
Outpatient Quality Reporting
(OQR)) after receiving TA from
QIOs.
Æ Percentage of eligible PCHs that
demonstrate improvement in
quality-of-care measures (per PPSExempt Cancer Hospital Quality
Reporting) after receiving TA from
QIOs.
Æ Performance period median
national measure rate on OQR
measure as posted on Hospital
Compare.
Æ Percentage of eligible physicians/
physician groups actively
participating in VM that require
technical assistance for electronic
submission (Physician Quality
Reporting System) and are
successful in subsequent
submissions.
Æ Percentage of eligible physicians/
eligible physician groups receiving
payment adjustments through VM.
• E.1. Technical Assistance—Quality
Improvement Initiatives (QIIs)
Æ Percentage of QIIs initiated within
30 days of the receipt of the
applicable referral or request for QII
technical assistance.
Æ Percentage of QIIs successfully
resolved.
Achievement within each of the Tasks
for each Task Order will be evaluated on
an individual basis for appropriate
contract action. Though, in general,
evaluation of each Task will relate only
to that area, we reserve the right to take
appropriate contract action in the event
of failure in multiple Task areas.
Overall Contract Evaluation
The results of the annual (12, 24, 36,
48th month) and 54th month evaluation
periods, in addition to ongoing
monitoring activities, will be used to
determine how each QIN–QIO
performed on the overall contract.
Annual and 54th Month Evaluation
Criteria are specifically defined in
Attachment J–1(b) of the QIN–QIO
SOW; the criteria for evaluating each
deliverable under the contract and Task
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 154 / Monday, August 11, 2014 / Notices
Order No. 001 are identified in
Attachment J.1(a) Schedule of
Deliverables of the 11th SOW. Further,
as indicated in Sections G.22 and G.29,
the Contracting Officer will use the
Contractor Performance Assessment
Reporting System (CPARS) criteria in
performing evaluations: Quality,
Schedule/Timeliness, Cost/Price
Control, Business Relations,
Management, and Small Business.
Performance on the evaluation criteria
defined in Attachment J–1(b) will be
considered for assessment of the Quality
sub-factor for the CPARS assessment.
If we choose, we may notify the QIN–
QIO of the intention not to renew the
QIN–QIO contract, and inform the QIN–
QIO of the QIN–QIO’s rights under the
current statute. Any failure at one or
more of the annual or 54th month
evaluations for any Task may result in
the QIN–QIO receiving an adverse
performance evaluation. Further, failure
may impact on the QIN–QIO’s ability to
continue similar work in or eligibility
for future QIO Program awards.
We reserve the right at any point,
prior to the notification of our intention
not to continue the option for a Task
and/or to renew the contract, to revise
measures or adjust the expected
minimum thresholds for satisfactory
performance or remove criteria from a
Task evaluation protocol for any reason,
including, but not limited to, data
gathered based on experience with the
amount of improvement achieved
during the contract cycle or in pilot
projects currently in progress,
information gathered through evaluation
of the QIN–QIO performance overall, or
any unforeseen circumstances. Further,
in accordance with standard contract
procedures, we reserve the right at any
time to discontinue all or part of one or
more tasks for one or more states or
territories in the QIN area or any other
part of this contract regardless of QIN–
QIO performance on the Task.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Rounding Rules
The rounding of results to assess the
minimum performance criteria
indicated in Section J, Attachment J.1(b)
uses the following rules.
1. Interim Calculations
We will not round the interim results
of calculations used to produce results.
(For example, we will not round the
results from steps used to calculate the
criteria or result). For example, we will
not first round baseline and remeasurement rates for the calculation of
relative improvement.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:35 Aug 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
2. Percentages/Proportions/Rates
Use conventional rounding ‘‘round
half up.’’ For example, to round from
the hundredth to the tenth digit, round
using the tie-break rule of ‘‘half-up.’’
5.45 will become 5.5 whereas 5.44 will
become 5.4. Apply conventional
rounding to one digit beyond that used
to specify the criteria (for example, for
whole numbers, to the tenths place). For
example, for a criterion expressed as 5
percent, 4.46 percent rounds to 4.5
percent and 4.44 percent rounds to 4.4
percent.
3. Integers
For discrete numbers of units required
for improvement, round to the more
favorable (typically lower) integer with
a minimum of one. We note that this
method is applied selectively to special
cases as indicated in Section J,
Attachment J.1(b). This method is more
than a rounding rule. We calculate a
minimum performance target using the
minimum performance criteria and the
size of the re-measurement criteria. For
example, for a minimum criteria of 95
percent and a re-measurement
denominator of 10, 10 × 0.95 = 9.5,
which is rounded down (the more
favorable direction) to 9. For this
example, if CMS specified use of the
integer rounding rule for this measure,
the minimum performance criteria of 95
percent would be met by achieving at
least 9 cases given a re-measurement
denominator count of size 10. If we do
not specifically indicate that the integer
rounding rule applied to this measure,
the percentage rounding rule would be
used.
III. Collection of Information
Requirements
This document does not impose
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
Consequently, it need not be reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
IV. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public
comments we normally receive on
Federal Register documents, we are not
able to acknowledge or respond to them
individually. We will consider all
comments we receive by the date and
time specified in the DATES section of
this preamble, and, when we proceed
with a subsequent document, we will
respond to the comments in the
preamble to that document.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46835
VI. Regulatory Impact Statement
In accordance with the provisions of
Executive Order 12866, this notice was
not reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
Dated: June 3, 2014.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2014–18901 Filed 8–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Comment Request
Proposed Projects:
Title: Annual Report/ACF 204 (State
MOE)—1 collection.
OMB No.: 0970–0248.
Description: The Administration for
Children and Families (ACF) is
requesting a three-year extension of the
ACF–204 (Annual MOE Report). The
report is used to collect descriptive
program characteristics information on
the programs operated by States and
Territories in association with their
Temporary Assistance for Needy
Families (TANF) programs. All State
and Territory expenditures claimed
toward States and Territories MOE
requirements must be appropriate, i.e.,
meet all applicable MOE requirements.
The Annual MOE Report provides the
ability to learn about and to monitor the
nature of State and Territory
expenditures used to meet States and
Territories MOE requirements, and it is
an important source of information
about the different ways that States and
Territories are using their resources to
help families attain and maintain selfsufficiency. In addition, the report is
used to obtain State and Territory
program characteristics for ACFs annual
report to Congress, and the report serves
as a useful resource to use in
Congressional hearings about how
TANF programs are evolving, in
assessing State the Territory MOE
expenditures, and in assessing the need
for legislative changes.
Respondents: The 50 States of the
United States, the District of Columbia,
Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands.
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46830-46835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18901]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[CMS-3300-NC]
RIN 0938-ZB15
Medicare Program; Evaluation Criteria and Standards for Quality
Improvement Networks Quality Improvement Program Contracts [Base and
Task Order(s)]
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice with comment period describes the general criteria
we intend to use to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the
Quality Innovation Network (QIN) Quality Improvement Organizations
(QIOs) that will enter into contracts with CMS under the Quality
Innovation Network Quality Improvement Organizations (Solicitation
Number: HHSM-500-2014-RFP-QIN-QIO) Statement of Work (SOW) on August 1,
2014. The evaluation of a QIN-QIO's performance related to their SOW
will be based on evaluation criteria specified for the tasks and
subtasks set forth in
[[Page 46831]]
Sections C.5, G.22 and G.29 of the QIN-QIO Base Contract and Attachment
J-1(b) of the Base Contract; Attachment J-1 is QIN-QIO Task Order No.
001.
DATES: Effective Date: August 1, 2014 to July 31, 2019 for the QIN-QIO
contract.
Comment Date: To be assured consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m.
on September 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, refer to file code CMS-3300-NC. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by facsimile
(FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of four ways (please choose only one
of the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this
regulation to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the ``Submit a
comment'' instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following
address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human Services,
Attention: CMS-3300-NC,
P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to
the following address only:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human Services,
Attention: CMS-3300-NC,
Mail Stop C4-26-05,
7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
4. By hand or courier. Alternatively, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments only to the following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC--
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human Services,
Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building,
200 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20201
(Because access to the interior of the Hubert H. Humphrey Building is
not readily available to persons without Federal government
identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in
the CMS drop slots located in the main lobby of the building. A stamp-
in clock is available for persons wishing to retain a proof of filing
by stamping in and retaining an extra copy of the comments being
filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD--
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human Services,
7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
If you intend to deliver your comments to the Baltimore address,
call telephone number (410) 786-9994 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members. Comments erroneously mailed to
the addresses indicated as appropriate for hand or courier delivery may
be delayed and received after the comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alfreda Staton, (410) 786-4194.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the
close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable or confidential business
information that is included in a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have been received: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the search instructions on that Web site to
view public comments.
Comments received timely will also be available for public
inspection as they are received, generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of a document, at the headquarters of the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view public comments,
phone 1-800-743-3951.
I. Background
Section 1153(h)(2) of the Social Security Act (the Act) requires
the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (the
Secretary) to publish in the Federal Register the general criteria and
standards that will be used to evaluate the effective and efficient
performance of contract obligations by the Quality Improvement
Organizations (QIOs), and to provide the opportunity for public comment
with respect to these criteria and standards. This notice describes the
general criteria that will be used to evaluate performance of the
Quality Innovation Network (QIN)--QIOs under the QIN-QIO 11th Statement
of Work (SOW) contract beginning August 1, 2014.
II. Provisions of the Notice With Comment Period
The QIN-QIO contract supports our efforts to improve health and
healthcare for all Medicare beneficiaries, including those who are
eligible for both the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and promote
quality of care to ensure the right care at the right time, every time.
The QIN-QIO SOW is structured so that QIN-QIOs perform under the base
contract and task orders. Task Order 001 outlines several tasks for the
QIN-QIOs as well as a mechanism for the proposal and adoption of
additional tasks known as ``Special Innovation Projects'' (SIPs).
Specifically, SIPs are initiatives, efforts, and programs rooted in the
QIN-QIO area. SIPs are recommended to the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), through the QIN-QIO, by community advocates,
organizers, and groups engaged with local health issues. The SIP is
intended to either address a health issue the community finds acute but
is less visible to high-level federal analytics or to respond to health
issues, local or national, that are discovered during the course of the
contract. In addition to the SIPs, QIOs are responsible for completing
the requirements for the following Tasks as part of Task Order 001:
Improving Cardiac Health and Reducing Cardiac Healthcare
Disparities;
Reducing Disparities in Diabetes Care;
Improving Prevention Coordination through Meaningful Use
of Health Information Technology (HIT) and Collaborating with Regional
Extension Centers (RECs);
Reducing Healthcare-Associated Infections in Hospitals;
Reducing Healthcare-Acquired Conditions in Nursing Homes;
Improving Coordination of Care;
Quality Improvement through Value-Based Payment, Quality
Reporting, and the Physician Feedback Reporting Program; and
Quality Improvement Initiatives.
(Detailed information for each Task may be found in sections B.1
through E.1 in Attachment J.1 posted on December 5, 2013 of
Solicitation Number: HHSM-500-2014-RFP-QIN-QIO, posted at the https://www.fedbizopps.gov Web site: https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=
opportunity&mode=form&id= dff522bababb 6b9859bb783 c08db6074.)
References in this Notice to ``Attachments'' are to attachments of the
RFP and SOW.
[[Page 46832]]
QIN-QIO Tasks
Improving Cardiac Health and Reducing Cardiac Healthcare Disparities
(See Section B.1 of Attachment J.1, QIN-QIO Task Order No. 001)
The purpose of this task is for the QIN-QIOs to work with providers
and beneficiaries in collaboration with key partners and stakeholders,
including RECs, to implement evidence-based practices to improve
cardiovascular health, reduce cardiovascular healthcare disparities,
and support the Department of Health and Human Services' Million
Hearts[supreg] initiative's goal to prevent one million heart attacks
and strokes. The Million Hearts[supreg] Web site is found at
www.millionhearts.hhs.gov. While the QIN-QIO's work targets Medicare
beneficiaries of all races and ethnicities, the QIN-QIO shall also
propose the number of clinicians, practitioners, and providers, (as
defined in section 1861(u) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 1395)), it will
recruit to voluntarily participate in this initiative. Focus will be on
those clinicians and provider that provide healthcare services to
African American, Hispanic, and other racial and ethnic minority
Medicare beneficiaries. Goals and targets will be monitored for
improvement in promoting the use of Aspirin therapy when appropriate;
Blood pressure (BP) control; Cholesterol management; and Smoking
assessment and cessation (ABCS).
Reducing Disparities in Diabetes Care: Everyone With Diabetes Counts
(EDC) (See Section B.2 in Attachment J.1, QIN-QIO Task Order No. 001)
The purpose of this Task is to improve the quality of the lives for
persons with diabetes, and to prevent or lessen the severity of
complications resulting from diabetes. The QIN-QIOs will promote
diabetes self-management education (DSME) for empowering Medicare
beneficiaries with diabetes to take an active role in controlling their
disease and improve clinical outcomes. The QIN-QIOs will work with
healthcare providers, practitioners, certified diabetes educators, and
community health workers to cultivate the knowledge and skills
necessary to improve the quality of the lives for persons with
diabetes. The QIN-QIOs will also work with stakeholders on preventing
or lessening the severity of complications resulting from diabetes such
as kidney failure, amputations, loss of vision, heart failure, and
stroke.
Improving Prevention Coordination Through Meaningful Use of HIT and
Collaborating With Regional Extension Centers (See Section B.4 in
Attachment J.1, QIN-QIO Task Order No. 001)
The purpose of this Task is to support physician and other
clinician practices to improve care and outcomes for their population
of patients through meaningful use of interoperable health IT in
collaboration with RECs. The QIN-QIOs will collaborate with RECs to
improve the quality of care and transitions in care through
interoperable health IT in connection with the Medicare program. The
QIN-QIOs will provide targeted technical assistance to Eligible
Professionals (EP), Eligible Hospitals (EH) and Critical Access
Hospitals (CAH) that are most challenged to successfully meet the
requirements of the Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive
Programs and utilizing EHR functionality for quality improvement.
Reducing Healthcare-Associated Infections in Hospitals (See Section C.1
in Attachment J.1 of the QIN-QIO Task Order)
The purpose of this Task is to improve beneficiary safety by
reducing the incidence of patient harm in the areas of healthcare-
associated infections (HAIs) in hospital settings. The QIN-QIO will use
evidence-based strategies and data to decrease and prevent HAIs in the
hospital setting to improve patient care. The QIO will work to decrease
Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI), Catheter-
Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) and Clostridium Difficile
Infection (CDI) Standardized Infection Ratios (SIRs) and improve
Urinary Catheter Utilization in hospital acute care settings for
Medicare beneficiaries.
Reducing Healthcare-Acquired Conditions in Nursing Homes (See Section
C.2 in Attachment J.1, QIN-QIO Task Order No. 001)
The purpose of this Task is to improve beneficiary safety by
reducing the incidence of healthcare-acquired conditions in nursing
home provider settings. The QIN-QIO will improve the quality of care
for Medicare beneficiaries in Nursing Homes by achieving improvement in
the Collaborative Quality Measure Composite Score composed of 13 NQF-
endorsed quality of care measures as listed in Attachment J.1--Task
Order 001, Task C.2. Appendix 4; decrease the percentage of residents
who received antipsychotic medications; and improve mobility of long-
stay residents. The QIN-QIO will work to support the creation of
National Nursing Home Quality Care Collaboratives (NNHQCC) to ``instill
quality and performance improvement practices, eliminate healthcare
acquired conditions, and improve resident satisfaction.'' The QIN-QIO
will work with participating nursing homes, beneficiaries, beneficiary
family members and/or beneficiary advocates/representatives, and in
collaboration with key partners and stakeholders to accomplish these
objectives.
Coordination of Care (See Section C.3 in Attachment J.1,QIN-QIO Task
Order No. 001)
The purpose of this Task is to improve hospital admission and/or
readmission rates, and adverse drug event rates by improving effective
communication and the continuity and coordination of patient care using
methods such as interoperable health IT. The QIN-QIO will improve the
quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries who transition among care
settings including home through a comprehensive community effort. These
efforts aim to reduce readmissions following hospitalization and to
yield sustainable and replicable strategies to achieve high-value
health care, particularly for chronically ill and disabled Medicare
beneficiaries. The QIN-QIOs will support the development of community
coalitions for improving communication and the coordination of clinical
decisions.
Quality Improvement Through Value-Based Payment, Quality Reporting, and
the Physician Feedback Reporting Program (See Section D.1 in Attachment
J.1, QIN-QIO Task Order No. 001)
The purpose of this Task is to improve quality care to
beneficiaries in physician settings by supporting provider use of and
participation in the CMS physician value modifier program and
coordinating community driven projects that advance efforts to achieve
better care at lower costs. The QIN-QIOs will improve healthcare by
identifying gaps and opportunities for improvement in quality,
efficiency, and care coordination. The QIOs shall be called upon to
assist hospitals, PPS-exempt Cancer Hospitals (PCHs), Inpatient
Psychiatric Facilities (IPFs), Ambulatory Surgical Centers (ASCs) and
physicians (as defined in section 1861(r) of the Act) in improving the
quality and efficiency of care through outreach and education about
CMS' hospital and physician value based payment programs, quality
reporting
[[Page 46833]]
programs, Physician Feedback Reporting Program, and the use of the
quality and cost measure information contained in the confidential
quality and resource use reports.
QIN-QIO-Proposed Projects That Advance Efforts for Better Care at Lower
Cost (See Section D.2 in Attachment J.1, QIN-QIO Task Order No. 001)
We will use SIPs to support QIN-QIOs in their respective services
areas to work with communities to improve healthcare quality and
efficiencies. Specifically, SIPs are initiatives, efforts, and programs
rooted in the QIN-QIO area. SIPs are recommended to us, through the
QIN-QIO, by community advocates, organizers, and groups engaged with
local health issues. The SIP is intended to address health issues that
the community finds acute but is less visible at a national-level.
Evaluation criteria and standards will be developed for each SIP.
Quality Improvement Initiatives (See Section E.1 in Attachment J.1,
QIN-QIO Task Order No. 001)
The purpose of this Task is to improve the quality of health care
for Medicare beneficiaries by providing technical assistance to
providers and practitioners. The QIN-QIO will improve healthcare
quality by assisting providers and/or practitioners in identifying the
root cause of a concern, developing a framework in which to address the
concern, and improving a process or system based on their analyses. A
Quality Improvement Initiative (QII) is any formal activity designed to
serve as a catalyst and support for quality improvement that uses
proven methodologies to achieve these improvements. The improvements
may relate to safety, healthcare, health and value and involve
providers, practitioners, beneficiaries, and/or communities. A QII may
consist of system-wide and/or non-system-wide changes and may be based
on a single, confirmed concern or multiple confirmed concerns.
Additionally, the QIN-QIO will collaborate with the Beneficiary and
Family Centered Care-QIO to improve Beneficiary (``Patient'') and
Family Engagement in healthcare quality improvement efforts and
actively supporting projects aimed at shared decision-making with
beneficiaries, families, and caregivers and families. QIIs may also be
based upon or responsive to referrals made by other contractors in the
QIO Program.
III. Evaluation of the Tasks
The QIN-QIO's performance will be evaluated based on achievement
associated with the Tasks in each awarded Task Order and as described
in Sections C.5, G.22 and G.29 of the QIN-QIO Base Contract and the
QIN-QIO Statement of Work (including Attachments J.1 and other
Attachments for measures and targets).
If a QIN-QIO is not tasked to work on a specific Task or an area
under a Task, the QIN-QIO will not be evaluated under that particular
area. Any Special Innovation Project that the QIN-QIO may carry out
will be evaluated separately and will not be considered in the overall
performance evaluation criteria.
We will conduct monitoring activities throughout the course of the
contract and will act upon findings as necessary. We will monitor, at
least quarterly, the QIN-QIO's performance relative to contract
requirements and targets as well as milestones and progress toward
successfully implementing plans and programs for each of the individual
states/territories of the QIN-QIO's service area, as well as the
aggregate, in the Task Award.
Information used for these monitoring purposes includes but is not
limited to:
Deliverables submitted by the QIN-QIO to CMS in accordance
with the Schedule of Deliverables;
Data for measures indicated in Attachment J.1(b);
Data from the QIN-QIO's Continuous Internal Quality
Improvement Program;
Other data submitted by QIN-QIOs as required by CMS;
Additional information gathered by email, telephone,
video, or in-person visits.
Plans and programs against which progress will be monitored include
but are not limited to:
Plan & Program Monitoring
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base contract or task order 001 Section(s) Brief description
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base Contract............................ C.6.1.1..................... Comprehensive Strategic Plan.
Task Order 001........................... A.1.1....................... Comprehensive Strategic Plan.
Base Contract............................ C.6.1.2..................... Integrated Communications Plan.
Task Order 001........................... A.1.3....................... Integrated Communications Plan.
Base Contract............................ C.6.1.3..................... Task Order Work Plan.
Base Contract............................ C.6.4.2..................... Recruitment.
Base Contract............................ C.6.4.3..................... Provider and Practitioner Recruitment.
Base Contract............................ C.6.4.4..................... Beneficiary (``Patient'') and Family Engagement.
Base Contract............................ C.6.4.5..................... Partner and Stakeholder Recruitment and Collaboration.
Base Contract............................ C.6.4.6..................... Sustainability Plan.
Task Order 001........................... A.1.2....................... Management Plan.
Task Order 001........................... A.1.6....................... Continuous Internal Quality Improvement Program.
All Task Orders from Task 001 forward.... All Sections................ Task Order 001, Excellence in Operations and Quality Improvement and all
subsequent Task Orders as specified.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QIN-QIOs shall cooperate with the Contracting Officer
Representative (COR) on all our monitoring processes and address any
concerns identified by the COR. We will take appropriate contract
action (for example, providing warning for the need for adjustment,
instituting a formal correction plan, terminating an activity, or
recommending early termination of a contract because of failure to meet
contract timelines or performance as specified in the contract). This
means that the QIO shall comply with the Base Contract, all Task
Orders, Schedules of Deliverables, Evaluation Measures Tables, and any
subsequent modifications (including HCQIS Memorandums) issued by CMS.
Additionally, there will be multiple periods of evaluation under
this contract. The first evaluation will occur at the end of the 12th
month of the contract. Subsequent evaluations will
[[Page 46834]]
occur at the end of the 24, 36, 48 and 54th months of the contract. The
evaluations will be based on the most recent data available to us. The
performance results of the evaluation at each evaluation period (that
is, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 54th months) will be used, in addition to
ongoing monitoring activities, to determine the QIO's performance on
the overall contract.
Annual and 54th Month Evaluation
Annual and the 54th month contract evaluation will determine if the
QIN-QIO has met the performance evaluation criteria as specified in the
Task areas of the Base Contract. The annual and 54th month evaluation
criteria are found in Section J, Attachment J.1(b), Evaluation Measures
Table of the QIN-QIO SOW. Attachment J.1(b) includes the following
measures, by Task:
B.1. Improving Cardiac Health
[cir] Percentage of patients whose blood pressure was adequately
controlled.
[cir] Percentage of patients who are screened about tobacco use at
least one time within 24 months.
[cir] Percentage of patients identified as tobacco users who are
provided with cessation counseling intervention.
B.2. Everyone with Diabetes Counts
[cir] Percentage of clinical outcome data for Medicare
beneficiaries who complete DSME classes through EDC. Clinical outcomes
are: HbA1c, Lipids, Eye Exam, Blood Pressure and Weight.
[cir] Percentage of physician practices recruited to participate in
EDC.
[cir] Percentage of New Beneficiaries Completing DSME.
B.3. (Reserved)
B.4. Meaningful Use of HIT and Collaborating With RECs
[cir] Percentage of recruited EPs, EHs and CAHs using certified EHR
technology (CEHRT) with signed agreements within each state or
territory.
[cir] Percentage of recruited EPs, EHs and CAHs using CEHRT
receiving technical assistance within each state or territory.
[cir] Percentage of recruited practitioners/providers attending
QIO's educational sessions and the Learning and Action Network.
[cir] Percentage of recruited EPs, EHs and CAHs that received
Technical Assistance (TA) that meet EHR Incentive Programs clinical
quality measures reporting requirements post TA within each state or
territory.
[cir] Percentage of recruited practitioners/providers working to
establish an electronic connection with beneficiaries/family
representative.
C.1. Reducing Healthcare-Acquired Infections (HAIs) in
Hospitals
[cir] CLABSI Standardized Infection Ratio.
[cir] CAUTI Standardized Infection Ratio.
[cir] Urinary Catheter Utilization Rate.
[cir] CDI Standardized Infection Rate.
[cir] Recruitment of non-ICU and ICU units in acute care facilities
to participate in HAI projects.
C.2. Reducing Healthcare-Acquired Conditions in Nursing Homes
[cir] Rate of reduction in percentage of residents who received
antipsychotic medications.
[cir] Percentage of long-stay residents with improved mobility.
[cir] Percentage of One-Star Category Target Number recruited for
Collaborative I.
[cir] Sum of Percentages of One-Star Category Target Number
recruited for Collaboratives I and II.
[cir] Percentage of Recruitment Target Number recruited for
Collaborative I.
[cir] Sum of percentages of Recruitment Target Number recruited for
Collaboratives I and II.
[cir] NNHQCC Quality Composite Measure Score.
C.3. Coordination of Care
[cir] Percentage of interventions implemented (for a minimum of 6
months) that show improvement (for a minimum of 5 interventions across
the region annually).
[cir] Percentage of 30-day readmissions per 1,000 Fee-for-Service
(FFS) beneficiaries in region-wide coalition.
[cir] Percentage of admissions per 1,000 FFS beneficiaries in
region-wide coalition.
[cir] Percentage of region-wide readmissions per 1,000 FFS
beneficiaries.
[cir] Percentage of adverse drug events per 1,000 screened
beneficiaries.
[cir] Increased community tenure in region-wide coalition.
``Community tenure'' is defined as the number of days beneficiaries
spend in their home setting.
D.1. Quality Improvement through Physician Value-Based
Modifiers
[cir] Percentage of eligible physicians/physician groups attending
QIO-convened forums related to the Value Modifier (VM) Program.
[cir] Percentage of eligible physicians/physician groups that
demonstrate improvement in quality-of-care measures (per Quality and
Resource Use Reports) after receiving TA from QIOs.
[cir] Percentage of eligible ASCs that demonstrate improvement in
quality-of-care measures (per Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality
Reporting) after receiving TA from QIOs.
[cir] Percentage of eligible IPFs that demonstrate improvement in
quality-of-care measures (per Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Quality
Reporting) after receiving TA from QIOs.
[cir] Percentage of eligible CAHs that demonstrate improvement in
quality-of-care measures (per Inpatient Quality Reporting or Outpatient
Quality Reporting (OQR)) after receiving TA from QIOs.
[cir] Percentage of eligible PCHs that demonstrate improvement in
quality-of-care measures (per PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality
Reporting) after receiving TA from QIOs.
[cir] Performance period median national measure rate on OQR
measure as posted on Hospital Compare.
[cir] Percentage of eligible physicians/physician groups actively
participating in VM that require technical assistance for electronic
submission (Physician Quality Reporting System) and are successful in
subsequent submissions.
[cir] Percentage of eligible physicians/eligible physician groups
receiving payment adjustments through VM.
E.1. Technical Assistance--Quality Improvement Initiatives
(QIIs)
[cir] Percentage of QIIs initiated within 30 days of the receipt of
the applicable referral or request for QII technical assistance.
[cir] Percentage of QIIs successfully resolved.
Achievement within each of the Tasks for each Task Order will be
evaluated on an individual basis for appropriate contract action.
Though, in general, evaluation of each Task will relate only to that
area, we reserve the right to take appropriate contract action in the
event of failure in multiple Task areas.
Overall Contract Evaluation
The results of the annual (12, 24, 36, 48th month) and 54th month
evaluation periods, in addition to ongoing monitoring activities, will
be used to determine how each QIN-QIO performed on the overall
contract. Annual and 54th Month Evaluation Criteria are specifically
defined in Attachment J-1(b) of the QIN-QIO SOW; the criteria for
evaluating each deliverable under the contract and Task
[[Page 46835]]
Order No. 001 are identified in Attachment J.1(a) Schedule of
Deliverables of the 11th SOW. Further, as indicated in Sections G.22
and G.29, the Contracting Officer will use the Contractor Performance
Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) criteria in performing evaluations:
Quality, Schedule/Timeliness, Cost/Price Control, Business Relations,
Management, and Small Business. Performance on the evaluation criteria
defined in Attachment J-1(b) will be considered for assessment of the
Quality sub-factor for the CPARS assessment.
If we choose, we may notify the QIN-QIO of the intention not to
renew the QIN-QIO contract, and inform the QIN-QIO of the QIN-QIO's
rights under the current statute. Any failure at one or more of the
annual or 54th month evaluations for any Task may result in the QIN-QIO
receiving an adverse performance evaluation. Further, failure may
impact on the QIN-QIO's ability to continue similar work in or
eligibility for future QIO Program awards.
We reserve the right at any point, prior to the notification of our
intention not to continue the option for a Task and/or to renew the
contract, to revise measures or adjust the expected minimum thresholds
for satisfactory performance or remove criteria from a Task evaluation
protocol for any reason, including, but not limited to, data gathered
based on experience with the amount of improvement achieved during the
contract cycle or in pilot projects currently in progress, information
gathered through evaluation of the QIN-QIO performance overall, or any
unforeseen circumstances. Further, in accordance with standard contract
procedures, we reserve the right at any time to discontinue all or part
of one or more tasks for one or more states or territories in the QIN
area or any other part of this contract regardless of QIN-QIO
performance on the Task.
Rounding Rules
The rounding of results to assess the minimum performance criteria
indicated in Section J, Attachment J.1(b) uses the following rules.
1. Interim Calculations
We will not round the interim results of calculations used to
produce results. (For example, we will not round the results from steps
used to calculate the criteria or result). For example, we will not
first round baseline and re-measurement rates for the calculation of
relative improvement.
2. Percentages/Proportions/Rates
Use conventional rounding ``round half up.'' For example, to round
from the hundredth to the tenth digit, round using the tie-break rule
of ``half-up.'' 5.45 will become 5.5 whereas 5.44 will become 5.4.
Apply conventional rounding to one digit beyond that used to specify
the criteria (for example, for whole numbers, to the tenths place). For
example, for a criterion expressed as 5 percent, 4.46 percent rounds to
4.5 percent and 4.44 percent rounds to 4.4 percent.
3. Integers
For discrete numbers of units required for improvement, round to
the more favorable (typically lower) integer with a minimum of one. We
note that this method is applied selectively to special cases as
indicated in Section J, Attachment J.1(b). This method is more than a
rounding rule. We calculate a minimum performance target using the
minimum performance criteria and the size of the re-measurement
criteria. For example, for a minimum criteria of 95 percent and a re-
measurement denominator of 10, 10 x 0.95 = 9.5, which is rounded down
(the more favorable direction) to 9. For this example, if CMS specified
use of the integer rounding rule for this measure, the minimum
performance criteria of 95 percent would be met by achieving at least 9
cases given a re-measurement denominator count of size 10. If we do not
specifically indicate that the integer rounding rule applied to this
measure, the percentage rounding rule would be used.
III. Collection of Information Requirements
This document does not impose information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. Consequently, it need not be reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
IV. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public comments we normally receive
on Federal Register documents, we are not able to acknowledge or
respond to them individually. We will consider all comments we receive
by the date and time specified in the DATES section of this preamble,
and, when we proceed with a subsequent document, we will respond to the
comments in the preamble to that document.
VI. Regulatory Impact Statement
In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this
notice was not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
Dated: June 3, 2014.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2014-18901 Filed 8-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P