Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; Indiana PSD Increments, 46709-46711 [2014-18830]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
46709
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 154 / Monday, August 11, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED IDAHO NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
Name of SIP provision
Applicable geographic
or non-attainment area
*
*
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 NO2
NAAQS.
*
State-wide .....................
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS.
State-wide .....................
[FR Doc. 2014–18810 Filed 8–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–2012–0567; FRL–9914–94–
Region–5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana;
Indiana PSD Increments
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a component of a state
implementation plan (SIP) submission
from Indiana addressing EPA’s
requirements for the prevention of
significant deterioration (PSD) program.
The proposed rulemaking associated
with today’s final action was published
on August 19, 2013.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
September 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0567. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
SUMMARY:
State
submittal
date
EPA approval date
Comments
*
9/16/2013
*
8/11/2014 [Insert FR citation].
9/16/2013
8/11/2014 [Insert FR citation].
*
*
This action addresses the following
CAA elements or portions thereof:
110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II),
(D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K),
(L), and (M).
This action addresses the following
CAA elements or portions thereof:
110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II),
(D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K),
(L), and (M).
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly-available only in hard
copy. Publicly-available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and
Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This
facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that
you telephone Andy Chang at (312)
886–0258 before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andy Chang, Environmental Engineer,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–0258,
chang.andy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background of the SIP
submissions?
A. What state SIP submissions does this
rulemaking address?
B. Why did the state make these SIP
submissions?
C. What is the scope of this rulemaking?
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background of the SIP
submissions?
A. What state SIP submissions does this
rulemaking address?
This final rulemaking addresses a
portion of a July 12, 2012, submission
and a December 12, 2012, supplemental
submission from the Indiana
Department of Environmental Quality
(IDEM). These submissions were made
to satisfy certain EPA requirements for
the state’s PSD program.
B. Why did the state make these SIP
submissions?
On October 20, 2010, EPA issued the
final rule on the ‘‘Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) for
Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5
Micrometers (PM2.5)—Increments,
Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and
Significant Monitoring Concentration
(SMC)’’ (2010 NSR Rule). This rule
established several components for
making PSD permitting determinations
for PM2.5, including a system of
‘‘increments’’ which is the mechanism
used to estimate significant
deterioration of ambient air quality for
a pollutant. These increments are
codified in 40 CFR 51.166(c) and 40
CFR 52.21(c), and are included in the
table below.
TABLE 1: PM2.5 INCREMENTS ESTABLISHED BY THE 2010 NSR RULE IN MICROGRAMS PER CUBIC METER
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Annual
arithmetic mean
Class I ..........................................................................................................................................................
Class II .........................................................................................................................................................
Class III ........................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:09 Aug 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
24-hour max
1
4
8
11AUR1
2
9
18
46710
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 154 / Monday, August 11, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
On July 12, 2012, and supplemented
on December 12, 2012, IDEM submitted
revisions intended to address the
increments established by the 2010 NSR
Rule for incorporation into the SIP.
Specifically, revisions to 326 IAC 2–2–
6(b) contained the Federal increments
for PM2.5 for Class II areas.
C. What is the scope of this rulemaking?
On August 19, 2013, EPA proposed to
approve various Clean Air Act (CAA)
requirements, including Indiana’s
satisfaction of the infrastructure SIP
requirements 1 for the 2008 ozone and
2008 lead National Ambient Air Quality
Standards, Indiana’s satisfaction of the
state board requirements obligated by
section 128 of the CAA, and Indiana’s
satisfaction of the PSD requirements
obligated by the 2010 NSR Rule. Among
these components was 326 IAC 2–2–
6(b), which contains the Federally
promulgated PM2.5 increments for Class
II areas in the state. Currently, there are
no Class I or Class III areas in the state,
and EPA did not receive any comments
related to its proposed approval of this
provision.2
II. What action Is EPA taking?
For the reasons discussed in our
August 19, 2013, proposed rulemaking,
EPA is taking final action to approve, as
proposed, 326 IAC 2–2–6(b) into
Indiana’s SIP. Specifically, 326 IAC 2–
2–6(b) contains the Federally
promulgated PM2.5 increments for Class
II areas, pursuant to 40 CFR 51.166(c)
and 40 CFR 52.21(c).
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews.
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
infrastructure SIP requirements are
designed to ensure that the structural components
of each state’s air quality management program are
adequate to meet the state’s responsibilities under
the CAA.
2 EPA did receive an adverse comment related to
Indiana’s lack of increments for Class I and Class
III areas. We will address this comment in a future
rulemaking.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
1 The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Aug 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
merely approves State law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by State law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by October 10, 2014.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: July 29, 2014.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. In § 52.770 the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry for
‘‘2–2–6’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.770
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
*
*
46711
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 154 / Monday, August 11, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS
Indiana citation
Subject
*
*
*
*
*
Rule 2. Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Requirements
*
*
2–2–6 ............................................
*
*
*
*
Increment
consumption;
requirements
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0142; FRL–9914–49–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
Revision to the Maintenance Plans for
the Richmond 1990 1-Hour and
Richmond-Petersburg 1997 8-Hour
Ozone Maintenance Areas To Remove
the Stage II Vapor Recovery Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve a revision to the
Virginia State Implementation Plan
(SIP). The revision removes the Stage II
vapor recovery program (Stage II) from
the maintenance plans for the
Richmond 1990 1-hour and RichmondPetersburg 1997 8-hour ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
Maintenance Areas (Richmond Area or
Area). The revision also includes an
analysis that addresses the impact of the
removal of Stage II from subject gasoline
dispensing facilities (GDFs) in the
Richmond Area. The analysis submitted
by the Commonwealth of Virginia
(Commonwealth) satisfies the
requirements of section 110(l) of the
Clean Air Act (CAA). EPA is approving
this revision in accordance with the
requirements of the CAA.
DATES: This rule is effective on October
10, 2014 without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse written comment
by September 10, 2014. If EPA receives
such comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
17:19 Aug 08, 2014
*
*
7/11/2012 ..................................................................
*
[FR Doc. 2014–18830 Filed 8–8–14; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
EPA approval
date
Indiana effective date
Jkt 232001
*
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
*
8/11/2014, [INSERT Federal
Register CITATION].
*
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2014–0142 by one of the
following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0142,
Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director,
Office of Air Program Planning,
Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2012–
0142. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
Sfmt 4700
*
*
Notes
*
*
(b) only
*
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality, 629 East Main
Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Asrah Khadr, (215) 814–2071, or by
email at khadr.asrah@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 12, 2013, the
Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a
formal revision to its SIP through the
Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality (VADEQ). The SIP revision
consists of the removal of Stage II from
the maintenance plans for the
Richmond Area. The SIP revision also
consists of an analysis demonstrating
that the removal of Stage II from the
Richmond Area maintenance plans will
not cause any increase in emissions.
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46709-46711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18830]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-2012-0567; FRL-9914-94-Region-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Indiana; Indiana PSD Increments
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a component of a state implementation plan (SIP)
submission from Indiana addressing EPA's requirements for the
prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) program. The proposed
rulemaking associated with today's final action was published on August
19, 2013.
DATES: This final rule is effective on September 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2012-0567. All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be
publicly-available only in hard copy. Publicly-available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air
and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We recommend that you
telephone Andy Chang at (312) 886-0258 before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy Chang, Environmental Engineer,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-0258, chang.andy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background of the SIP submissions?
A. What state SIP submissions does this rulemaking address?
B. Why did the state make these SIP submissions?
C. What is the scope of this rulemaking?
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background of the SIP submissions?
A. What state SIP submissions does this rulemaking address?
This final rulemaking addresses a portion of a July 12, 2012,
submission and a December 12, 2012, supplemental submission from the
Indiana Department of Environmental Quality (IDEM). These submissions
were made to satisfy certain EPA requirements for the state's PSD
program.
B. Why did the state make these SIP submissions?
On October 20, 2010, EPA issued the final rule on the ``Prevention
of Significant Deterioration (PSD) for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5
Micrometers (PM2.5)--Increments, Significant Impact Levels
(SILs) and Significant Monitoring Concentration (SMC)'' (2010 NSR
Rule). This rule established several components for making PSD
permitting determinations for PM2.5, including a system of
``increments'' which is the mechanism used to estimate significant
deterioration of ambient air quality for a pollutant. These increments
are codified in 40 CFR 51.166(c) and 40 CFR 52.21(c), and are included
in the table below.
Table 1: PM2.5 Increments Established by the 2010 NSR Rule in Micrograms
per Cubic Meter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual
arithmetic mean 24-hour max
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Class I........................... 1 2
Class II.......................... 4 9
Class III......................... 8 18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 46710]]
On July 12, 2012, and supplemented on December 12, 2012, IDEM
submitted revisions intended to address the increments established by
the 2010 NSR Rule for incorporation into the SIP. Specifically,
revisions to 326 IAC 2-2-6(b) contained the Federal increments for
PM2.5 for Class II areas.
C. What is the scope of this rulemaking?
On August 19, 2013, EPA proposed to approve various Clean Air Act
(CAA) requirements, including Indiana's satisfaction of the
infrastructure SIP requirements \1\ for the 2008 ozone and 2008 lead
National Ambient Air Quality Standards, Indiana's satisfaction of the
state board requirements obligated by section 128 of the CAA, and
Indiana's satisfaction of the PSD requirements obligated by the 2010
NSR Rule. Among these components was 326 IAC 2-2-6(b), which contains
the Federally promulgated PM2.5 increments for Class II
areas in the state. Currently, there are no Class I or Class III areas
in the state, and EPA did not receive any comments related to its
proposed approval of this provision.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The infrastructure SIP requirements are designed to ensure
that the structural components of each state's air quality
management program are adequate to meet the state's responsibilities
under the CAA.
\2\ EPA did receive an adverse comment related to Indiana's lack
of increments for Class I and Class III areas. We will address this
comment in a future rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. What action Is EPA taking?
For the reasons discussed in our August 19, 2013, proposed
rulemaking, EPA is taking final action to approve, as proposed, 326 IAC
2-2-6(b) into Indiana's SIP. Specifically, 326 IAC 2-2-6(b) contains
the Federally promulgated PM2.5 increments for Class II
areas, pursuant to 40 CFR 51.166(c) and 40 CFR 52.21(c).
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 10, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: July 29, 2014.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 52.770 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry for ``2-2-6'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.770 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 46711]]
EPA-Approved Indiana Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indiana effective
Indiana citation Subject date EPA approval date Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Rule 2. Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
2-2-6........................... Increment 7/11/2012.......... 8/11/2014, [INSERT (b) only
consumption; Federal Register
requirements CITATION].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-18830 Filed 8-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
