Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request, 46465-46468 [2014-18728]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 153 / Friday, August 8, 2014 / Notices
and 16 years or older. Interested
students will submit a job shadowing
application package, and designation of
their top three choices for the job
shadowing experience to include but
not limited to biomedical, chemistry,
computer science, engineering,
meteorology, and physics. Interested
students will also identify two science,
math, or technology teachers associated
with their current school of enrollment
to submit recommendation forms.
Students may request a shadowing
opportunity for a period of 1–5 days.
This information collection renewal
includes updates to the application
package for clarity and
comprehensibility, and transitions from
a paper submittal process to an
electronic submittal process.
II. Method of Collection
Electronic.
III. Data
Title: Kennedy Educational
Experiences program (KEEP).
OMB Number: 2700–0135.
Type of Review: Extension of
currently approved information
collection with change.
Affected Public: Individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
60.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 30.6.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Respondents: $0.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of NASA, including
whether the information collected has
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
NASA’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including automated
collection techniques or the use of other
forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection.
They will also become a matter of
public record.
Frances Teel,
NASA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–18790 Filed 8–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 Aug 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
BOARD
Sunshine Act Meetings: August 2014
TIME AND DATES:
All meetings are held at 2:00 p.m.
Tuesday, August 5;
Wednesday, August 6;
Thursday, August 7;
Tuesday, August 12;
Wednesday, August 13;
Thursday, August 14;
Tuesday, August 19;
Wednesday, August 20;
Thursday, August 21;
Tuesday, August 26;
Wednesday, August 27;
Thursday, August 28.
PLACE: Board Agenda Room, No. 11820,
1099 14th St. NW., Washington, DC
20570.
STATUS: Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Pursuant to
§ 102.139(a) of the Board’s Rules and
Regulations, the Board or a panel
thereof will consider ‘‘the issuance of a
subpoena, the Board’s participation in a
civil action or proceeding or an
arbitration, or the initiation, conduct, or
disposition . . . of particular
representation or unfair labor practice
proceedings under section 8, 9, or 10 of
the [National Labor Relations] Act, or
any court proceedings collateral or
ancillary thereto.’’ See also 5 U.S.C.
552b(c)(10).
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Henry Breiteneicher, Associate
Executive Secretary, (202) 273–2917.
Dated: August 6, 2014.
William B. Cowen,
Solicitor.
[FR Doc. 2014–18923 Filed 8–6–14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7545–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), and as part
of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden, the
National Science Foundation (NSF) is
inviting the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on this
proposed continuing information
collection. This is the second notice for
public comment; the first was published
in the Federal Register at 79 FR 20244
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46465
and no comments were received. NSF is
forwarding the proposed submission to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for clearance simultaneously
with the publication of this second
notice. The full submission may be
found at: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAMain.
DATES: Comments regarding these
information collections are best assured
of having their full effect if received by
OMB within 30 days of publication in
the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding (a) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of NSF,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
NSF’s estimate of burden including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; or (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology should be
addressed to: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for National Science
Foundation, 725—17th Street NW.,
Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503,
and to Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports
Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Suite 1265, Arlington, Virginia 22230 or
send email to splimpto@nsf.gov. Copies
of the submission may be obtained by
calling (703) 292–7556.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne H. Plimpton, NSF Reports
Clearance Officer at (703) 292–7556 or
send email to splimpto@nsf.gov.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339, which is accessible 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year
(including Federal holidays).
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: National Science
Foundation Science Honorary Awards
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
46466
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 153 / Friday, August 8, 2014 / Notices
OMB Control No.: 3145–0035.
Abstract: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) administers several
honorary awards, among them the
President’s National Medal of Science,
the Alan T. Waterman Award, the
National Science Board (NSB) Vannevar
Bush Award, the NSB Public Service
Award, the Presidential Awards for
Excellence in Science, Mathematics and
Engineering Mentoring (PAESMEM)
program, and the Presidential Awards
for Excellence in Mathematics and
Science Teaching (PAEMST) program.
In 2003, to comply with E-government
requirements, the nomination processes
were converted to electronic submission
through the National Science
Foundation’s (NSF) FastLane system or
via other electronic systems as
described in the individual nomination
process. Individuals can now prepare
nominations and references through
www.fastlane.nsf.gov/honawards/. Firsttime users must register on the Fastlane
Web site using the link found in the
upper right-hand corner above the ‘‘Log
In’’ box before accessing any of the
honorary award categories. The
nominations for PAESMEM also may be
submitted via www.grants.gov.
Nominations and applications are
submitted on the PAEMST portal at
www.PAEMST.org.
Use of the Information: The
Foundation has the following honorary
award programs:
• President’s National Medal of
Science. Statutory authority for the
President’s National Medal of Science is
contained in 42 U.S.C. 1881 (Pub. L. 86–
209), which established the award and
stated that ‘‘(t)he President shall . . .
award the Medal on the
recommendations received from the
National Academy of Sciences or on the
basis of such other information and
evidence as . . . appropriate.’’
Subsequently, Executive Order 10961
specified procedures for the Award by
establishing a National Medal of Science
Committee which would ‘‘receive
recommendations made by any other
nationally representative scientific or
engineering organization.’’ On the basis
of these recommendations, the
Committee was directed to select its
candidates and to forward its
recommendations to the President.
In 1962, to comply with these
directives, the Committee initiated a
solicitation form letter to invite these
nominations. In 1979, the Committee
initiated a nomination form as an
attachment to the solicitation letter. A
slightly modified version of the
nomination form was used in 1980.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 Aug 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
The Committee has established the
following considerations for selection of
candidates:
a. The impact of an individual’s body
of work on the current state of his or her
field of science or engineering;
b. Whether the individual’s
achievements are of an unusually
significant nature in relation to the
potential effects on the development of
thought in his or her field of science or
engineering;
c. Whether the nominee has
demonstrated unusually distinguished
service in the general advancement of
science and/or engineering for the
Nation, especially when accompanied
by substantial contributions to the
content of science;
d. The recognition of the nominee by
peers within his or her community, and
whether s/he is recognized for
substantial impact in fields in addition
to his/her discipline;
e. If the nominee has made
contributions to innovation and
industry;
f. Whether the nominee has
demonstrated sustained influence on
education through publications,
teaching activities, outreach, mentoring,
etc., and;
g. Whether the nominee’s
contributions have created significant
positive impact for the Nation.
In 2003, the Committee changed the
active period of eligibility to three years,
including the year of nomination. After
that time, candidates must be
renominated with a new nomination
package for them to be considered by
the Committee.
Narratives are now restricted to three
pages of text, as stipulated in the
guidelines at: https://www.fastlane.nsf.
gov/honawards/medalHome.do.
• Alan T. Waterman Award. Congress
established the Alan T. Waterman
Award in August 1975 (42 U.S.C. 1881a
(Pub. L. 94–86) and authorized NSF to
‘‘establish the Alan T. Waterman Award
for research or advanced study in any of
the sciences or engineering’’ to mark the
25th anniversary of the National Science
Foundation and to honor its first
Director. The annual award recognizes
an outstanding young researcher in any
field of science or engineering
supported by NSF. In addition to a
medal, the awardee receives a grant of
$1,000,000 over a five-year period for
scientific research or advanced study in
the mathematical, physical, medical,
biological, engineering, social, or other
sciences at the institution of the
recipient’s choice.
The Alan T. Waterman Award
Committee was established by NSF to
comply with the directive contained in
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Public Law 94–86. The Committee
solicits nominations from members of
the National Academy of Sciences,
National Academy of Engineering,
scientific and technical organizations,
and any other source, public or private,
as appropriate.
In 1976, the Committee initiated a
form letter to solicit these nominations.
In 1980, a nomination form was used
which standardized the nomination
procedures, allowed for more effective
Committee review, and permitted better
staff work in a short period of time. On
the basis of its review, the Committee
forwards its recommendation to the
Director, NSF, and the National Science
Board (NSB).
Candidates must be U.S. citizens or
permanent residents and must be 35
years of age or younger or not more than
seven years beyond receipt of the Ph.D.
degree by December 31 of the year in
which they are nominated. Candidates
should have demonstrated exceptional
individual achievements in scientific or
engineering research of sufficient
quality to place them at the forefront of
their peers. Criteria include originality,
innovation, and significant impact on
the field.
• Vannevar Bush Award. The NSB
established the Vannevar Bush Award
in 1980 to honor Dr. Bush’s unique
contributions to public service. The
award recognizes an individual who,
through public service activities in
science and technology, has made an
outstanding ‘‘contribution toward the
welfare of mankind and the Nation.’’
The NSB ad hoc Committee on
Honorary Awards annually solicits
nominations from science, engineering
and educational societies. A candidate
must be a senior stateperson who is an
American citizen and meets two or more
of the following criteria:
1. Distinguished himself/herself
through public service activities in
science and technology.
2. Pioneered the exploration, charting,
and settlement of new frontiers in
science, technology, education, and
public service.
3. Demonstrated leadership and
creativity that have inspired others to
distinguished careers in science and
technology.
4. Contributed to the welfare of the
Nation and mankind through activities
in science and technology.
5. Demonstrated leadership and
creativity that have helped mold the
history of advancements in the Nation’s
science, technology, and education.
Nominations must include a narrative
description about the nominee, a
curriculum vitae (without publications),
and a brief citation summarizing the
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 153 / Friday, August 8, 2014 / Notices
nominee’s scientific or technological
contributions to our national welfare in
promotion of the progress of science.
Nominations must also include two
reference letters, submitted separate
from the nomination through
www.fastlane.nsf.gov/honawards/.
Nominations remain active for three
years, including the year of nomination.
After that time, candidates must be
renominated with a new nomination for
them to be considered by the selection
committee.
• NSB Public Service Award. The
NSB Public Service Award Committee
was established in November 1996. This
annual award recognizes people and
organizations that have increased the
public understanding of science or
engineering. The award is given to an
individual and to a group (company,
corporation, or organization), but not to
members of the U.S. Government.
Eligibility includes any individual or
group (company, corporation, or
organization) that has increased the
public understanding of science or
engineering. Members of the U.S.
Government are not eligible for
consideration.
Candidates for the individual and
group (company, corporation, or
organization) award must have made
contributions to public service in areas
other than research, and should meet
one or more of the following criteria:
1. Increased the public’s
understanding of the processes of
science and engineering through
scientific discovery, innovation and its
communication to the public.
2. Encouraged others to help raise the
public understanding of science and
technology.
3. Promoted the engagement of
scientists and engineers in public
outreach and scientific literacy.
4. Contributed to the development of
broad science and engineering policy
and its support.
5. Influenced and encouraged the next
generation of scientists+ and engineers.
6. Achieved broad recognition outside
the nominee’s area of specialization.
7. Fostered awareness of science and
technology among broad segments of the
population.
Nominations must include a summary
of the candidate’s activities as they
relate to the selection criteria; the
nominator’s name, address and
telephone number; the name, address,
and telephone number of the nominee;
and the candidate’s vita, if appropriate
(no more than three pages).
The selection committee recommends
the most outstanding candidate(s) for
each category to the NSB, which
approves the awardees.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 Aug 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
Nominations remain active for a
period of three years, including the year
of nomination. After that time,
candidates must be renominated with a
new nomination for them to be
considered by the selection committee.
• Presidential Awards for Excellence
in Science, Mathematics and
Engineering Mentoring (PAESMEM)
program
In 1996, the White House, through the
National Science and Technology
Council (NSTC) and the Office of
Science and Technology Policy (OSTP),
established the Presidential Awards for
Excellence in Science, Mathematics and
Engineering Mentoring (PAESMEM)
program. The program, administered on
behalf of the White House by the
National Science Foundation, seeks to
identify outstanding mentoring efforts
or programs designed to enhance the
participation of groups (women,
minorities and persons with disabilities
as well as groups from low
socioeconomic regions)
underrepresented in science,
mathematics and engineering. The
awardees will serve as exemplars to
their colleagues and will be leaders in
the national effort to more fully develop
the Nation’s human resources in
science, mathematics and engineering.
This award is managed at NSF by the
Directorate for Education and Human
Resources (EHR).
The award will be made to U.S.
citizens or U.S. permanent residents
based on the following: (1) An
individual who has demonstrated
outstanding and sustained mentoring
and effective guidance to a significant
number of early career STEM
professionals, students at the K–12,
undergraduate, or graduate education
level or (2) to an organization that,
through its programming, has enabled a
substantial number of students
underrepresented in science,
mathematics and engineering to
successfully pursue and complete the
relevant degree programs as well as
mentoring of early career STEM
professionals. Nominees must have
served in a mentoring role for at least
five years. Nominations are reviewed for
impact, significance of the mentoring
activity and quality of the mentoring
activity. Nominations for organizational
awards must demonstrate rigorous
evaluation and/or assessment during the
five-year period of the mentoring
activity.
Award Ceremony
The awardees are hosted for two days
in Washington, DC, for celebratory
activities. Recipients of the PAESMEM
award receive a monetary award in the
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46467
amount of $10,000 from NSF and a
commemorative Presidential certificate.
If scheduling permits, the President
meets with the mentors for a photo
opportunity at the White House. The
Director of OSTP and the Director of
NSF present the awards to the mentors
at an awards ceremony.
• Presidential Award for Excellence
in Mathematics and Science Teaching
The Presidential Award for
Excellence in Mathematics and Science
Teaching (PAEMST) is the highest
recognition that a kindergarten through
12th-grade mathematics or science
teacher may receive for outstanding
teaching in the United States. Enacted
by Congress in 1983, this program
authorizes the President to bestow 108
awards, assuming there are qualified
applicants. In even-numbered years,
nominations are accepted for
elementary teachers (grades K–6); in
odd-numbered years, secondary
teachers (grades 7–12) are nominated.
This award is managed at NSF by the
Directorate for Education and Human
Resources (EHR).
Nomination Criteria
A teacher may be nominated by a
principal, another teacher, students,
members of the community, or the
general public. Self-nominations are
allowed. Awardees must be either U.S.
Citizens or U.S. Permanent Residents. A
Nominee must meet the following
criteria to apply:
• Be highly qualified as deemed by
their states, districts, or schools;
• Teach in one of the 50 States, the
District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the
four U.S. territories, including the
Department of Defense Schools
(DoDEA).
• Hold a degree or appropriate
credentials in the category for which
they are applying.
• Be a full-time employee of the
school or school district.
• Have at least 5 years of mathematics
or science teaching (including computer
science) experience prior to application.
• Teach mathematics or science at the
kindergarten through 6th grade level or
at the 7th through 12th grade level in a
public or private school.
• Not have received the national
PAEMST award in any prior
competition or category.
Application Process
• Applicants complete a 12-page
written document on five dimensions of
outstanding teaching (content
knowledge, pedagogy, assessment,
leadership and professional
development) and submit a video of one
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
46468
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 153 / Friday, August 8, 2014 / Notices
class. Three letters of reference
including one from a school official are
required, along with a resume or
biographical sketch.
• The applicant has a 7-month period
(October to May) to complete
applications and submit them for state
review. The nomination period is from
October to April.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Review of Nominations
• State coordinators convene state
selection committees of prominent
mathematicians, scientists, mathematics
and science educators, and past
awardees to select up to five
mathematics and five science finalists
for recognition at the state level and for
submission to NSF. To ensure
consistency, state selection committees
review their applications using the same
criteria and scoring information that
was approved by OSTP.
• NSF (EHR) convenes a National
Selection Committee of prominent
mathematicians, scientists, mathematics
and science educators, and past
awardees that review the application
packets of the state finalists and make
recommendations to NSF. NSF reviews
these recommendations and
recommends one awardee in both
mathematics and science for all eligible
jurisdictions, when possible, to OSTP.
Alternatively, NSF may recommend two
awardees from a discipline in a
jurisdiction, when warranted.
Award Ceremony
The awardees are hosted for 3–4 days
in Washington, DC, for a variety of
professional development sessions and
celebratory activities. Each awardee
receives a citation signed by the
President and $10,000 from NSF. If
scheduling permits, the President meets
the teachers for a photo opportunity at
the White House. The Director of OSTP
and the Director of NSF present the
citations to the teachers at an awards
ceremony. Awardees also have the
opportunity to meet their congressional
representatives and education
representatives from other federal
agencies.
Estimate of Burden: These are annual
award programs with application
deadlines varying according to the
program. Public burden also may vary
according to program; however, across
all the programs, it is estimated that
each submission will average 19 hours
per respondent. If the nominator is
thoroughly familiar with the
disciplinary background of the nominee,
time spent to complete the nomination
may be considerably reduced.
Respondents: Individuals, businesses
or other for-profit organizations,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 Aug 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
universities, non-profit institutions, and
Federal and State governments.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Award: 1782 responses, broken down as
follows: For the President’s National
Medal of Science, 80; for the Alan T.
Waterman Award, 70; for the Vannevar
Bush Award, 12; for the Public Service
Award, 20; for the PAESMEM, 200; and
1400 for the PAEMST.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 41,080 hours, broken
down by 1,600 hours for the President’s
National Medal of Science (20 hours per
80 respondents); 1,400 hours for the
Alan T. Waterman Award (20 hours per
70 respondents); 180 hours for the
Vannevar Bush Award (15 hours per 12
respondents); 300 hours for the Public
Service Award (15 hours per 20
respondents); 4,000 hours for the
PAESMEM (20 hours per 200
respondents); and 33,600 hours for the
PAEMST (24 hours per 1400
respondents).
Frequency of Responses: Annually.
Comments: Comments are invited on
(a) whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; or (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Dated: August 4, 2014.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2014–18728 Filed 8–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
a notice of permit applications received
to conduct activities regulated under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.
NSF has published regulations under
the Antarctic Conservation Act at Title
45 Part 670 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. This is the required notice
of permit applications received.
DATES: Interested parties are invited to
submit written data, comments, or
views with respect to this permit
application by September 8, 2014. This
application may be inspected by
interested parties at the Permit Office,
address below.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
addressed to Permit Office, Room 755,
Division of Polar Programs, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Li
Ling Hamady, ACA Permit Officer, at
the above address or ACApermits@
nsf.gov or (703) 292–7149.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: The
National Science Foundation, as
directed by the Antarctic Conservation
Act of 1978 (Public Law 95–541), as
amended by the Antarctic Science,
Tourism and Conservation Act of 1996,
has developed regulations for the
establishment of a permit system for
various activities in Antarctica and
designation of certain animals and
certain geographic areas a requiring
special protection. The regulations
establish such a permit system to
designate Antarctic Specially Protected
Areas.
Application Details
1. Applicant Permit Application:
2015–005
Matthew Lazzara
1225 W Dayton St
Madison, WI 53706
Activity for Which Permit is Requested
ASPA Entry; The applicant wishes to
enter Cape Hallett ASPA to retrieve
data collected at an already installed
weather station and to perform minor
maintenance and updates to the
station.
Location
Notice of Permit Applications Received
under the Antarctic Conservation Act
of 1978 (P.L. 95–541)
National Science Foundation
ACTION: Notice of Permit Applications
Received under the Antarctic
Conservation Act of 1978, Public Law
95–541.
AGENCY:
The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is required to publish
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
ASPA 106 Cape Hallett, Northern
Victoria Land, Ross Sea
Dates
November 10–November 20, 2014
Nadene G. Kennedy,
Polar Coordination Specialist, Division of
Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014–18780 Filed 8–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 153 (Friday, August 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46465-46468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18728]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), and as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, the National Science Foundation
(NSF) is inviting the general public and other Federal agencies to
comment on this proposed continuing information collection. This is the
second notice for public comment; the first was published in the
Federal Register at 79 FR 20244 and no comments were received. NSF is
forwarding the proposed submission to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance simultaneously with the publication of this
second notice. The full submission may be found at: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
DATES: Comments regarding these information collections are best
assured of having their full effect if received by OMB within 30 days
of publication in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Written comments regarding (a) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
NSF, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b)
the accuracy of NSF's estimate of burden including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; or (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology should be addressed to: Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for
National Science Foundation, 725--17th Street NW., Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, and to Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance
Officer, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite
1265, Arlington, Virginia 22230 or send email to splimpto@nsf.gov.
Copies of the submission may be obtained by calling (703) 292-7556.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne H. Plimpton, NSF Reports
Clearance Officer at (703) 292-7556 or send email to splimpto@nsf.gov.
Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339,
which is accessible 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year
(including Federal holidays).
An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB
control number and the agency informs potential persons who are to
respond to the collection of information that such persons are not
required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: National Science Foundation Science Honorary
Awards
[[Page 46466]]
OMB Control No.: 3145-0035.
Abstract: The National Science Foundation (NSF) administers several
honorary awards, among them the President's National Medal of Science,
the Alan T. Waterman Award, the National Science Board (NSB) Vannevar
Bush Award, the NSB Public Service Award, the Presidential Awards for
Excellence in Science, Mathematics and Engineering Mentoring (PAESMEM)
program, and the Presidential Awards for Excellence in Mathematics and
Science Teaching (PAEMST) program.
In 2003, to comply with E-government requirements, the nomination
processes were converted to electronic submission through the National
Science Foundation's (NSF) FastLane system or via other electronic
systems as described in the individual nomination process. Individuals
can now prepare nominations and references through
www.fastlane.nsf.gov/honawards/. First-time users must register on the
Fastlane Web site using the link found in the upper right-hand corner
above the ``Log In'' box before accessing any of the honorary award
categories. The nominations for PAESMEM also may be submitted via
www.grants.gov. Nominations and applications are submitted on the
PAEMST portal at www.PAEMST.org.
Use of the Information: The Foundation has the following honorary
award programs:
President's National Medal of Science. Statutory authority
for the President's National Medal of Science is contained in 42 U.S.C.
1881 (Pub. L. 86-209), which established the award and stated that
``(t)he President shall . . . award the Medal on the recommendations
received from the National Academy of Sciences or on the basis of such
other information and evidence as . . . appropriate.''
Subsequently, Executive Order 10961 specified procedures for the
Award by establishing a National Medal of Science Committee which would
``receive recommendations made by any other nationally representative
scientific or engineering organization.'' On the basis of these
recommendations, the Committee was directed to select its candidates
and to forward its recommendations to the President.
In 1962, to comply with these directives, the Committee initiated a
solicitation form letter to invite these nominations. In 1979, the
Committee initiated a nomination form as an attachment to the
solicitation letter. A slightly modified version of the nomination form
was used in 1980.
The Committee has established the following considerations for
selection of candidates:
a. The impact of an individual's body of work on the current state
of his or her field of science or engineering;
b. Whether the individual's achievements are of an unusually
significant nature in relation to the potential effects on the
development of thought in his or her field of science or engineering;
c. Whether the nominee has demonstrated unusually distinguished
service in the general advancement of science and/or engineering for
the Nation, especially when accompanied by substantial contributions to
the content of science;
d. The recognition of the nominee by peers within his or her
community, and whether s/he is recognized for substantial impact in
fields in addition to his/her discipline;
e. If the nominee has made contributions to innovation and
industry;
f. Whether the nominee has demonstrated sustained influence on
education through publications, teaching activities, outreach,
mentoring, etc., and;
g. Whether the nominee's contributions have created significant
positive impact for the Nation.
In 2003, the Committee changed the active period of eligibility to
three years, including the year of nomination. After that time,
candidates must be renominated with a new nomination package for them
to be considered by the Committee.
Narratives are now restricted to three pages of text, as stipulated
in the guidelines at: https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/honawards/medalHome.do.
Alan T. Waterman Award. Congress established the Alan T.
Waterman Award in August 1975 (42 U.S.C. 1881a (Pub. L. 94-86) and
authorized NSF to ``establish the Alan T. Waterman Award for research
or advanced study in any of the sciences or engineering'' to mark the
25th anniversary of the National Science Foundation and to honor its
first Director. The annual award recognizes an outstanding young
researcher in any field of science or engineering supported by NSF. In
addition to a medal, the awardee receives a grant of $1,000,000 over a
five-year period for scientific research or advanced study in the
mathematical, physical, medical, biological, engineering, social, or
other sciences at the institution of the recipient's choice.
The Alan T. Waterman Award Committee was established by NSF to
comply with the directive contained in Public Law 94-86. The Committee
solicits nominations from members of the National Academy of Sciences,
National Academy of Engineering, scientific and technical
organizations, and any other source, public or private, as appropriate.
In 1976, the Committee initiated a form letter to solicit these
nominations. In 1980, a nomination form was used which standardized the
nomination procedures, allowed for more effective Committee review, and
permitted better staff work in a short period of time. On the basis of
its review, the Committee forwards its recommendation to the Director,
NSF, and the National Science Board (NSB).
Candidates must be U.S. citizens or permanent residents and must be
35 years of age or younger or not more than seven years beyond receipt
of the Ph.D. degree by December 31 of the year in which they are
nominated. Candidates should have demonstrated exceptional individual
achievements in scientific or engineering research of sufficient
quality to place them at the forefront of their peers. Criteria include
originality, innovation, and significant impact on the field.
Vannevar Bush Award. The NSB established the Vannevar Bush
Award in 1980 to honor Dr. Bush's unique contributions to public
service. The award recognizes an individual who, through public service
activities in science and technology, has made an outstanding
``contribution toward the welfare of mankind and the Nation.''
The NSB ad hoc Committee on Honorary Awards annually solicits
nominations from science, engineering and educational societies. A
candidate must be a senior stateperson who is an American citizen and
meets two or more of the following criteria:
1. Distinguished himself/herself through public service activities
in science and technology.
2. Pioneered the exploration, charting, and settlement of new
frontiers in science, technology, education, and public service.
3. Demonstrated leadership and creativity that have inspired others
to distinguished careers in science and technology.
4. Contributed to the welfare of the Nation and mankind through
activities in science and technology.
5. Demonstrated leadership and creativity that have helped mold the
history of advancements in the Nation's science, technology, and
education.
Nominations must include a narrative description about the nominee,
a curriculum vitae (without publications), and a brief citation
summarizing the
[[Page 46467]]
nominee's scientific or technological contributions to our national
welfare in promotion of the progress of science. Nominations must also
include two reference letters, submitted separate from the nomination
through www.fastlane.nsf.gov/honawards/. Nominations remain active for
three years, including the year of nomination. After that time,
candidates must be renominated with a new nomination for them to be
considered by the selection committee.
NSB Public Service Award. The NSB Public Service Award
Committee was established in November 1996. This annual award
recognizes people and organizations that have increased the public
understanding of science or engineering. The award is given to an
individual and to a group (company, corporation, or organization), but
not to members of the U.S. Government.
Eligibility includes any individual or group (company, corporation,
or organization) that has increased the public understanding of science
or engineering. Members of the U.S. Government are not eligible for
consideration.
Candidates for the individual and group (company, corporation, or
organization) award must have made contributions to public service in
areas other than research, and should meet one or more of the following
criteria:
1. Increased the public's understanding of the processes of science
and engineering through scientific discovery, innovation and its
communication to the public.
2. Encouraged others to help raise the public understanding of
science and technology.
3. Promoted the engagement of scientists and engineers in public
outreach and scientific literacy.
4. Contributed to the development of broad science and engineering
policy and its support.
5. Influenced and encouraged the next generation of scientists+ and
engineers.
6. Achieved broad recognition outside the nominee's area of
specialization.
7. Fostered awareness of science and technology among broad
segments of the population.
Nominations must include a summary of the candidate's activities as
they relate to the selection criteria; the nominator's name, address
and telephone number; the name, address, and telephone number of the
nominee; and the candidate's vita, if appropriate (no more than three
pages).
The selection committee recommends the most outstanding
candidate(s) for each category to the NSB, which approves the awardees.
Nominations remain active for a period of three years, including
the year of nomination. After that time, candidates must be renominated
with a new nomination for them to be considered by the selection
committee.
Presidential Awards for Excellence in Science, Mathematics
and Engineering Mentoring (PAESMEM) program
In 1996, the White House, through the National Science and
Technology Council (NSTC) and the Office of Science and Technology
Policy (OSTP), established the Presidential Awards for Excellence in
Science, Mathematics and Engineering Mentoring (PAESMEM) program. The
program, administered on behalf of the White House by the National
Science Foundation, seeks to identify outstanding mentoring efforts or
programs designed to enhance the participation of groups (women,
minorities and persons with disabilities as well as groups from low
socioeconomic regions) underrepresented in science, mathematics and
engineering. The awardees will serve as exemplars to their colleagues
and will be leaders in the national effort to more fully develop the
Nation's human resources in science, mathematics and engineering. This
award is managed at NSF by the Directorate for Education and Human
Resources (EHR).
The award will be made to U.S. citizens or U.S. permanent residents
based on the following: (1) An individual who has demonstrated
outstanding and sustained mentoring and effective guidance to a
significant number of early career STEM professionals, students at the
K-12, undergraduate, or graduate education level or (2) to an
organization that, through its programming, has enabled a substantial
number of students underrepresented in science, mathematics and
engineering to successfully pursue and complete the relevant degree
programs as well as mentoring of early career STEM professionals.
Nominees must have served in a mentoring role for at least five years.
Nominations are reviewed for impact, significance of the mentoring
activity and quality of the mentoring activity. Nominations for
organizational awards must demonstrate rigorous evaluation and/or
assessment during the five-year period of the mentoring activity.
Award Ceremony
The awardees are hosted for two days in Washington, DC, for
celebratory activities. Recipients of the PAESMEM award receive a
monetary award in the amount of $10,000 from NSF and a commemorative
Presidential certificate. If scheduling permits, the President meets
with the mentors for a photo opportunity at the White House. The
Director of OSTP and the Director of NSF present the awards to the
mentors at an awards ceremony.
Presidential Award for Excellence in Mathematics and
Science Teaching
The Presidential Award for Excellence in Mathematics and Science
Teaching (PAEMST) is the highest recognition that a kindergarten
through 12th-grade mathematics or science teacher may receive for
outstanding teaching in the United States. Enacted by Congress in 1983,
this program authorizes the President to bestow 108 awards, assuming
there are qualified applicants. In even-numbered years, nominations are
accepted for elementary teachers (grades K-6); in odd-numbered years,
secondary teachers (grades 7-12) are nominated. This award is managed
at NSF by the Directorate for Education and Human Resources (EHR).
Nomination Criteria
A teacher may be nominated by a principal, another teacher,
students, members of the community, or the general public. Self-
nominations are allowed. Awardees must be either U.S. Citizens or U.S.
Permanent Residents. A Nominee must meet the following criteria to
apply:
Be highly qualified as deemed by their states, districts,
or schools;
Teach in one of the 50 States, the District of Columbia,
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the four U.S. territories,
including the Department of Defense Schools (DoDEA).
Hold a degree or appropriate credentials in the category
for which they are applying.
Be a full-time employee of the school or school district.
Have at least 5 years of mathematics or science teaching
(including computer science) experience prior to application.
Teach mathematics or science at the kindergarten through
6th grade level or at the 7th through 12th grade level in a public or
private school.
Not have received the national PAEMST award in any prior
competition or category.
Application Process
Applicants complete a 12-page written document on five
dimensions of outstanding teaching (content knowledge, pedagogy,
assessment, leadership and professional development) and submit a video
of one
[[Page 46468]]
class. Three letters of reference including one from a school official
are required, along with a resume or biographical sketch.
The applicant has a 7-month period (October to May) to
complete applications and submit them for state review. The nomination
period is from October to April.
Review of Nominations
State coordinators convene state selection committees of
prominent mathematicians, scientists, mathematics and science
educators, and past awardees to select up to five mathematics and five
science finalists for recognition at the state level and for submission
to NSF. To ensure consistency, state selection committees review their
applications using the same criteria and scoring information that was
approved by OSTP.
NSF (EHR) convenes a National Selection Committee of
prominent mathematicians, scientists, mathematics and science
educators, and past awardees that review the application packets of the
state finalists and make recommendations to NSF. NSF reviews these
recommendations and recommends one awardee in both mathematics and
science for all eligible jurisdictions, when possible, to OSTP.
Alternatively, NSF may recommend two awardees from a discipline in a
jurisdiction, when warranted.
Award Ceremony
The awardees are hosted for 3-4 days in Washington, DC, for a
variety of professional development sessions and celebratory
activities. Each awardee receives a citation signed by the President
and $10,000 from NSF. If scheduling permits, the President meets the
teachers for a photo opportunity at the White House. The Director of
OSTP and the Director of NSF present the citations to the teachers at
an awards ceremony. Awardees also have the opportunity to meet their
congressional representatives and education representatives from other
federal agencies.
Estimate of Burden: These are annual award programs with
application deadlines varying according to the program. Public burden
also may vary according to program; however, across all the programs,
it is estimated that each submission will average 19 hours per
respondent. If the nominator is thoroughly familiar with the
disciplinary background of the nominee, time spent to complete the
nomination may be considerably reduced.
Respondents: Individuals, businesses or other for-profit
organizations, universities, non-profit institutions, and Federal and
State governments.
Estimated Number of Responses per Award: 1782 responses, broken
down as follows: For the President's National Medal of Science, 80; for
the Alan T. Waterman Award, 70; for the Vannevar Bush Award, 12; for
the Public Service Award, 20; for the PAESMEM, 200; and 1400 for the
PAEMST.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 41,080 hours, broken
down by 1,600 hours for the President's National Medal of Science (20
hours per 80 respondents); 1,400 hours for the Alan T. Waterman Award
(20 hours per 70 respondents); 180 hours for the Vannevar Bush Award
(15 hours per 12 respondents); 300 hours for the Public Service Award
(15 hours per 20 respondents); 4,000 hours for the PAESMEM (20 hours
per 200 respondents); and 33,600 hours for the PAEMST (24 hours per
1400 respondents).
Frequency of Responses: Annually.
Comments: Comments are invited on (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology; or (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Dated: August 4, 2014.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2014-18728 Filed 8-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P