Availability of a Revised Environmental Assessment and Incidental Take Plan for the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife's Trapping Program, 45838-45840 [2014-18548]
Download as PDF
45838
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 151 / Wednesday, August 6, 2014 / Notices
Wildlife Service, 7915 Baymeadows
Way, Suite 200, Jacksonville, FL 32256.
In-person drop-off: You may drop off
information during regular business
hours at the above office address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin
M. Gawera, telephone: (904) 731–3121;
email: erin_gawera@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 9 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.) and our implementing Federal
regulations in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR part 17
prohibit the ‘‘take’’ of fish or wildlife
species listed as endangered or
threatened. Take of listed fish or
wildlife is defined under the Act as ‘‘to
harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or
to attempt to engage in any such
conduct’’ (16 U.S.C. 1532). However,
under limited circumstances, we issue
permits to authorize incidental take—
i.e., take that is incidental to, and not
the purpose of, the carrying out of an
otherwise lawful activity.
Regulations governing incidental take
permits for threatened and endangered
species are at 50 CFR 17.32 and 17.22,
respectively. The Act’s take prohibitions
do not apply to federally listed plants
on private lands unless such take would
violate State law. In addition to meeting
other criteria, an incidental take
permit’s proposed actions must not
jeopardize the existence of federally
listed fish, wildlife, or plants.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Applicant’s Proposal
The City of Deltona is requesting
additional take of approximately 0.9
acres (ac) of occupied Florida scrub-jay
foraging and sheltering habitat
incidental to construction of a 24-ac
public park. The existing 10-year permit
is for take of approximately 1.9 acres
(ac) for a 35-ac public utility on the
same property. The 122-ac project site is
located on parcel numbers
31183166150001, 31183105150010,
31183105140010, 31183105130010,
31183105120010, 31183105110010,
31183105160010, 31183105170010,
31183105180010, 31183105190010,
31183105200010, 31183104050010,
31183104040010, 31183104030010,
31183104020010, 31183104010010,
31183166170001, 31183104060010,
31183104070010, 31183104080010,
31183104090010, 31183104100010,
31183103010010, 31183103020010,
31183103030010, 31183103040010,
31183103050010, 31183103060010,
31183103070010, 31183103080010,
31183103090010, 31183103100010,
31183103030010, and 31183103080160,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Aug 05, 2014
Jkt 232001
within Section 31, Township 18 South,
Range 31 East, Volusia County, Florida.
The project includes construction of a
public park and public utility and the
associated infrastructure, and
landscaping. The applicant proposes to
mitigate for the take of the Florida
scrub-jay through the additional deposit
of good funds in the amount of
$13,320.90 to the Nature Conservancy’s
Conservation Fund, for the management
and conservation of the Florida scrubjay based on Service Mitigation
Guidelines. The applicant has deposited
$56,243.80 to the Nature Conservancy’s
Conservation Fund for the public
utilities.
Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc.
is requesting take of approximately 3.08
acres (ac) of occupied sand skink
foraging and sheltering habitat
incidental to construction of a 73-ac
hospital, and seeks a 10-year permit.
The 73-ac project site is located on
parcel numbers 20–21–28–0000–00–
007, 20–21–28–0000–00–042, 20–21–
28–0000–00–044, and 20–21–28–0000–
00–046, within Section 20, Township 21
South, Range 28 East, Orange County,
Florida. The project includes
construction of a hospital and the
associated infrastructure, and
landscaping. The applicant proposes to
mitigate for the take of the sand skink
by the purchase of 6.2 mitigation credits
within the Sebring Scrub Conservation
Bank.
Our Preliminary Determination
We have determined that the
applicant’s proposals, including the
proposed mitigation and minimization
measures, would have minor or
negligible effects on the species covered
in the HCPs. Therefore, we determined
that the ITPs are ‘‘low-effect’’ projects
and qualify for categorical exclusions
under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA), as provided by the
Department of the Interior Manual (516
DM 2 Appendix 1 and 516 DM 6
Appendix 1). A low-effect HCP is one
involving (1) Minor or negligible effects
on federally listed or candidate species
and their habitats, and (2) minor or
negligible effects on other
environmental values or resources.
Next Steps
We will evaluate the plans and
comments we receive to determine
whether the ITP applications meets the
requirements of section 10(a) of the Act
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If we determine
that the applications meet these
requirements, we will issue ITP
#TE28377B–1 and TE41877B–0. We will
also evaluate whether issuance of the
section 10(a)(1)(B) ITPs comply with
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
section 7 of the Act by conducting intraService section 7 consultations. We will
use the results of these consultations, in
combination with the above findings, in
our final analysis to determine whether
or not to issue the ITPs. If the
requirements are met, we will issue the
permits to the applicants.
Public Comments
If you wish to comment on the permit
application, plan, and associated
documents, you may submit comments
by any one of the methods in
ADDRESSES.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comments, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority
We provide this notice under Section
10 of the Act and NEPA regulations (40
CFR 1506.6).
Dated: July 28, 2014.
Jay B. Herrington,
Field Supervisor, Jacksonville Field Office.
[FR Doc. 2014–18591 Filed 8–5–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R5–ES–2014–0020; 50120–1112–
0000]
Availability of a Revised Environmental
Assessment and Incidental Take Plan
for the Maine Department of Inland
Fisheries and Wildlife’s Trapping
Program
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
On November 9, 2011, we, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service),
published a notice of availability of a
draft environmental assessment (DEA)
and receipt of an application for an
incidental take permit (permit) pursuant
to the Endangered Species Act of 1973,
as amended (ESA), submitted by the
Maine Department of Inland Fisheries
and Wildlife (MDIFW), for the Maine
Trapping Program Incidental Take Plan
(ITP). MDIFW is requesting a permit
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 151 / Wednesday, August 6, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
under the ESA to authorize take of the
federally threatened Canada lynx
incidental to otherwise lawful activities
associated with MDIFW’s statewide
furbearer trapping program. The permit
would be in effect for 15 years.
During the 60-day comment period,
the Service received numerous
comments on the DEA and the ITP.
MDIFW revised the draft ITP to address
public and Service comments and
submitted a revised ITP to the Service
in July 2013. The Service then revised
its DEA. This notice announces the
availability for a 30-day supplemental
public comment period of both the
revised DEA and the revised ITP for
MDIFW’s incidental take permit
application.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
September 5, 2014. Comments
submitted electronically using the
Federal eRulemaking Portal (see
ADDRESSES section, below) must be
received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on
the closing date.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov, or in hard copy,
via U.S. mail, to: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: FWS–R5–ES–2014–
0020; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Headquarters, MS: BPHC; 5275 Leesburg
Pike; Falls Church, VA 22041–3803.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laury Zicari, by U.S. mail at the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Maine Field
Office, 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite #2,
Orono, ME 04473; or by phone at 207–
866–3344.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 9, 2011 (76 FR 69758),
the Service published a notice of
availability of a draft environmental
assessment (DEA) and receipt of an
application for an incidental take permit
(permit), pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B)
of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), for
the Maine Trapping Program Incidental
Take Plan (ITP). The Maine Department
of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife
(MDIFW) is requesting a permit under
the ESA to authorize take of the
federally threatened Canada lynx (Lynx
canadensis) incidental to otherwise
lawful activities associated with
MDIFW’s statewide furbearer trapping
programs (i.e., fur trapping, animal
damage, and predator management
control). The permit would be in effect
for 15 years.
During the 60-day comment period,
which ran through January 9, 2012, the
Service received numerous comments
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Aug 05, 2014
Jkt 232001
on the DEA and the draft ITP. The
MDIFW revised the draft ITP to address
public and Service comments and
submitted a revised ITP to the Service
on July 29, 2013. The Service then
revised its DEA. This notice announces
the availability for a 30-day
supplemental public comment period of
the both the revised DEA and the
revised ITP for MDIFW’s incidental take
permit application.
How Incidental Take Permits Work
Section 9 of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.) and its implementing
regulations prohibit the ‘‘take’’ of
animal species listed as endangered or
threatened. Take is defined under the
ESA as to ‘‘harass, harm, pursue, hunt,
shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or
collect listed animal species, or to
attempt to engage in such conduct’’ (16
U.S.C. 1538). However, under section
10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA, we may issue
permits to authorize incidental take of
listed species. ‘‘Incidental take’’ is
defined by the ESA as take that is
incidental to, and not the purpose of,
carrying out an otherwise lawful
activity. Regulations governing
incidental take permits for threatened
and endangered species, respectively,
are found in the Code of Federal
Regulations (50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32).
If an incidental take permit is granted
to MDIFW, the State and licensed
trappers conducting otherwise legal
trapping activities would be authorized
to incidentally take Canada lynx
according to limitations prescribed in
the revised ITP, along with any
additional conditions the Service
determines are necessary and
appropriate for issuance of an incidental
take permit.
Applicant’s Revised Incidental Take
Permit Application
On July 29, 2013, the Service received
a revised ITP from MDIFW that
incorporates changes responding to
comments from the public and the
Service. The revised ITP includes
important changes and clarifications
from MDIFW’s previous draft ITP,
which was submitted to the Service in
2008 and released for comment in 2011
(76 FR 69758). Under the covered
activities of the revised ITP, MDIFW
includes predator management and
animal damage control programs, in
addition to recreational fur trapping.
Several new methods of trapping and
new trapping regulations would be
implemented, including lifting the size
restrictions on foothold traps. Measures
to avoid and minimize take have been
updated to include increased veterinary
oversight, protocols for responding to
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45839
orphan kittens, increased trapper
outreach, and increased compliance
monitoring. Further, the revised ITP
incorporates additional contingencies to
address a number of potential changed
circumstances. The requested incidental
take over the 15-year duration of the
permit is increased to 195 incidentally
trapped lynx, of which 9 may
experience major injury and 3 may die.
The other incidentally trapped lynx
would be released with no or minor
injuries. Finally, MDIFW has clarified
the mitigation strategy and seeks to
address the impact of lynx mortalities.
Mitigation consists of maintaining and
enhancing at least 4,785 acres of lynx
habitat on a 10,411-acre area on the
Maine Division of Parks and Public
Lands Seboomook Unit in northern
Maine.
Service’s Revised Draft Environmental
Assessment
The Service has revised its DEA to
reflect MDIFW’s revised ITP. The
changes to the DEA include: (1) A
revised purpose and need for a permit;
(2) new alternatives to the proposed
action; (3) a description of the aspects
of the human environment that would
be affected by MDIFW’s trapping
programs; and (4) an evaluation of the
environmental consequences of the
proposed project and the mitigation
measures.
The DEA considers four alternatives:
(1) Status quo: No action, no
incidental take permit is issued, and
trapping continues in its current form
consistent with the requirements of the
2007 Consent Decree. The Consent
Decree is a settlement agreement
stemming from an earlier lawsuit,
Animal Protection Institute v. Roland D.
Martin, which imposes a number of
restrictions on trapping activities in
lynx wildlife management districts. Fur
trapping, predator management, and
animal damage control continue
statewide in this alternative.
(2) No action: No incidental take
permit is issued, and, to avoid take of
lynx, MDIFW discontinues all trapping
programs in lynx wildlife management
districts.
(3) Proposed action: An incidental
take permit is issued to MDIFW, and
measures in the 2013 revised ITP are
implemented.
(4) An incidental take permit is issued
to MDIFW for statewide fur trapping,
but the predator management and
animal damage control programs in lynx
wildlife management districts are
discontinued. Fur trapping measures in
the 2013 revised ITP are implemented.
For alternatives 2 to 4, we presume
that the described programs would
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
45840
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 151 / Wednesday, August 6, 2014 / Notices
replace the requirements of the 2007
Consent Decree, which would
ultimately be rescinded. A number of
issues that were raised during the initial
public comment period on the DEA are
still relevant to the revised proposed
action. Therefore, the Service’s DEA
also has included a response to
comments to explain how those issues
are handled in MDIFW’s revised ITP
and the Service’s revised DEA.
Next Steps
We will evaluate the revised ITP and
comments we receive on the Service’s
revised DEA to determine whether the
permit application meets the
requirements of section 10(a) of the ESA
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). We will also
evaluate whether issuance of a section
10(a)(1)(B) permit would comply with
section 7 of the ESA by conducting an
intra-Service section 7 consultation. We
will use the results of this consultation,
in combination with the above findings,
in our final analysis to determine
whether to issue a permit. If the
requirements are met, we will issue the
permit to the applicant.
Authority
This notice is provided pursuant to
section 10(c) of the ESA and the
National Environmental Policy Act
regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R3–ES–2014–N159;
FXES11130300000–145–FF03E00000]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Permit Applications
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of permit
applications; request for comments.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS), invite the
public to comment on the following
applications we’ve received for permits
to authorize take of federally listed
species. Although the Endangered
Species Act (Act) prohibits the take of
species listed as endangered or
threatened under the Act, the USFWS
may issue permits authorizing the take
of endangered or threatened species if
certain conditions are met by the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
17:14 Aug 05, 2014
Jkt 232001
We must receive any written
comments on or before September 5,
2014.
Mussel Species
DATES:
Send written comments by
U.S. mail to the Regional Director, Attn:
Thomas J. Magnuson, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Ecological Services,
5600 American Blvd. West, Suite 990,
Bloomington, MN 55437–1458; or by
electronic mail to permitsR3ES@fws.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas J. Magnuson, (612) 713–5467.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Background
We invite public comment on the
following permit applications for certain
activities with federally listed species
authorized by section 10(a)(1)(A) of the
Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and our
regulations governing the taking of
endangered species in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR
part 17. Submit your comments, or
request for a copy of the complete
application to the mailing address or
email address shown in ADDRESSES.
Permit Application Number: TE40128B
[FR Doc. 2014–18548 Filed 8–5–14; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
The applicant requests a permit
amendment to add the following mussel
and fish species to their permit.
Proposed activities are for the recovery
and enhancement of survival of the
species in the wild.
Permit Applications
Dated: July 22, 2014.
Paul R. Phifer,
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological
Services.
SUMMARY:
applicant, and when such take will not
appreciably reduce the likelihood of the
survival and recovery of the species in
the wild. The Act requires that we invite
public comment before we issue these
permits.
Applicant: Charles Morgan, Mainstream
Commercial Divers, Inc.
The applicant requests a permit to
take (survey, capture and release; nondestructive sampling) all threatened and
endangered unionid mussels within the
States of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida,
Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,
Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan,
Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Tennessee, West Virginia,
and Wisconsin. Proposed activities are
for the recovery and enhancement of
survival of the species in the wild.
Permit Application Number: TE82666A
Applicant: Justin Boyles, University of
Southern Illinois
The applicant requests a permit
amendment to add the northern longeared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) to
their permit. The requested amendment
would also add personnel to the permit.
Proposed activities are for the recovery
and enhancement of survival of the
species in the wild.
Permit Application Number: TE049738
Applicant: Foree Davis, Third Rock
Consultants, LLC.
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Alabama lampmussel (Lampsilis
virescens)
Alabama moccasinshell mussel
(Medionidus acutissimus)
Appalachian elktoe mussel
(Alasmidonta raveneliana)
Appalachian monkeyface mussel
(Quadrula sparsa)
Birdwing pearlymussel (Lemiox
rimosus)
Coosa moccasinshell (Medionidus
parvulus)
Cracking pearlymussel (Hemistena lata)
Finelined pocketbook mussel (Lampsilis
altilis)
Finerayed pigtoe mussel (Fusconaia
cuneolus)
Fluted kidneyshell mussel
(Ptychobranchus subtentum)
Georgia pigtoe mussel (Pleurobema
hanleyianum)
Green blossom pearlymussel
(Epioblasma torulosa gubernaculum)
Ovate clubshell mussel (Pleurobema
perovatum)
Pale Lilliput mussel (Toxolasma
cylindrellus)
Rabbitsfoot mussel (Quadrula cylindrica
cylindrica)
Rayed bean (Villosa fabalis)
Rough rabbitsfoot (Quadrula cylindrica
strigillata)
Scaleshell mussel (Leptodea leptodon)
Sheepnose (Plethobasus cyphyus)
Shiny pigtoe (Fusconaia cor)
Slabside pearlymussel (Pleuronaia
dolabelloides)
Snuffbox mussel (Epioblasma triquetra)
Southern acornshell mussel
(Epioblasma othcaloogenis)
Southern pigtoe mussel (Pleurobema
georgianum)
Spectaclease mussel (Cumberlandia
monodonta)
Tan riffleshell mussle (Epioblasma
florentina walkeri)
Triangular kidneyshell mussel
(Ptychobranchus greenii)
Tubercled blossom mussel (Epioblasma
torulosa torulosa)
Turgid blossom mussel (Epioblasma
turgidula)
White wartyback mussel (Plethobasus
cicatricosus)
Winged mapleleaf mussel (Quadrula
fragosa)
Yellow blossom mussel (Epioblasma
florentina florentina)
Fish Species
Spotfin chub (Erimonax monachus)
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 151 (Wednesday, August 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45838-45840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18548]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R5-ES-2014-0020; 50120-1112-0000]
Availability of a Revised Environmental Assessment and Incidental
Take Plan for the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife's
Trapping Program
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On November 9, 2011, we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service), published a notice of availability of a draft environmental
assessment (DEA) and receipt of an application for an incidental take
permit (permit) pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA), submitted by the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries
and Wildlife (MDIFW), for the Maine Trapping Program Incidental Take
Plan (ITP). MDIFW is requesting a permit
[[Page 45839]]
under the ESA to authorize take of the federally threatened Canada lynx
incidental to otherwise lawful activities associated with MDIFW's
statewide furbearer trapping program. The permit would be in effect for
15 years.
During the 60-day comment period, the Service received numerous
comments on the DEA and the ITP. MDIFW revised the draft ITP to address
public and Service comments and submitted a revised ITP to the Service
in July 2013. The Service then revised its DEA. This notice announces
the availability for a 30-day supplemental public comment period of
both the revised DEA and the revised ITP for MDIFW's incidental take
permit application.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments
by September 5, 2014. Comments submitted electronically using the
Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES section, below) must be
received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted electronically via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov, or in hard
copy, via U.S. mail, to: Public Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-R5-ES-
2014-0020; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Headquarters, MS: BPHC; 5275
Leesburg Pike; Falls Church, VA 22041-3803.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laury Zicari, by U.S. mail at the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Maine Field Office, 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite
2, Orono, ME 04473; or by phone at 207-866-3344.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 9, 2011 (76 FR 69758), the Service published a notice
of availability of a draft environmental assessment (DEA) and receipt
of an application for an incidental take permit (permit), pursuant to
section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), for the Maine
Trapping Program Incidental Take Plan (ITP). The Maine Department of
Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (MDIFW) is requesting a permit under the
ESA to authorize take of the federally threatened Canada lynx (Lynx
canadensis) incidental to otherwise lawful activities associated with
MDIFW's statewide furbearer trapping programs (i.e., fur trapping,
animal damage, and predator management control). The permit would be in
effect for 15 years.
During the 60-day comment period, which ran through January 9,
2012, the Service received numerous comments on the DEA and the draft
ITP. The MDIFW revised the draft ITP to address public and Service
comments and submitted a revised ITP to the Service on July 29, 2013.
The Service then revised its DEA. This notice announces the
availability for a 30-day supplemental public comment period of the
both the revised DEA and the revised ITP for MDIFW's incidental take
permit application.
How Incidental Take Permits Work
Section 9 of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and its implementing
regulations prohibit the ``take'' of animal species listed as
endangered or threatened. Take is defined under the ESA as to ``harass,
harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect
listed animal species, or to attempt to engage in such conduct'' (16
U.S.C. 1538). However, under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA, we may
issue permits to authorize incidental take of listed species.
``Incidental take'' is defined by the ESA as take that is incidental
to, and not the purpose of, carrying out an otherwise lawful activity.
Regulations governing incidental take permits for threatened and
endangered species, respectively, are found in the Code of Federal
Regulations (50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32).
If an incidental take permit is granted to MDIFW, the State and
licensed trappers conducting otherwise legal trapping activities would
be authorized to incidentally take Canada lynx according to limitations
prescribed in the revised ITP, along with any additional conditions the
Service determines are necessary and appropriate for issuance of an
incidental take permit.
Applicant's Revised Incidental Take Permit Application
On July 29, 2013, the Service received a revised ITP from MDIFW
that incorporates changes responding to comments from the public and
the Service. The revised ITP includes important changes and
clarifications from MDIFW's previous draft ITP, which was submitted to
the Service in 2008 and released for comment in 2011 (76 FR 69758).
Under the covered activities of the revised ITP, MDIFW includes
predator management and animal damage control programs, in addition to
recreational fur trapping. Several new methods of trapping and new
trapping regulations would be implemented, including lifting the size
restrictions on foothold traps. Measures to avoid and minimize take
have been updated to include increased veterinary oversight, protocols
for responding to orphan kittens, increased trapper outreach, and
increased compliance monitoring. Further, the revised ITP incorporates
additional contingencies to address a number of potential changed
circumstances. The requested incidental take over the 15-year duration
of the permit is increased to 195 incidentally trapped lynx, of which 9
may experience major injury and 3 may die. The other incidentally
trapped lynx would be released with no or minor injuries. Finally,
MDIFW has clarified the mitigation strategy and seeks to address the
impact of lynx mortalities. Mitigation consists of maintaining and
enhancing at least 4,785 acres of lynx habitat on a 10,411-acre area on
the Maine Division of Parks and Public Lands Seboomook Unit in northern
Maine.
Service's Revised Draft Environmental Assessment
The Service has revised its DEA to reflect MDIFW's revised ITP. The
changes to the DEA include: (1) A revised purpose and need for a
permit; (2) new alternatives to the proposed action; (3) a description
of the aspects of the human environment that would be affected by
MDIFW's trapping programs; and (4) an evaluation of the environmental
consequences of the proposed project and the mitigation measures.
The DEA considers four alternatives:
(1) Status quo: No action, no incidental take permit is issued, and
trapping continues in its current form consistent with the requirements
of the 2007 Consent Decree. The Consent Decree is a settlement
agreement stemming from an earlier lawsuit, Animal Protection Institute
v. Roland D. Martin, which imposes a number of restrictions on trapping
activities in lynx wildlife management districts. Fur trapping,
predator management, and animal damage control continue statewide in
this alternative.
(2) No action: No incidental take permit is issued, and, to avoid
take of lynx, MDIFW discontinues all trapping programs in lynx wildlife
management districts.
(3) Proposed action: An incidental take permit is issued to MDIFW,
and measures in the 2013 revised ITP are implemented.
(4) An incidental take permit is issued to MDIFW for statewide fur
trapping, but the predator management and animal damage control
programs in lynx wildlife management districts are discontinued. Fur
trapping measures in the 2013 revised ITP are implemented.
For alternatives 2 to 4, we presume that the described programs
would
[[Page 45840]]
replace the requirements of the 2007 Consent Decree, which would
ultimately be rescinded. A number of issues that were raised during the
initial public comment period on the DEA are still relevant to the
revised proposed action. Therefore, the Service's DEA also has included
a response to comments to explain how those issues are handled in
MDIFW's revised ITP and the Service's revised DEA.
Next Steps
We will evaluate the revised ITP and comments we receive on the
Service's revised DEA to determine whether the permit application meets
the requirements of section 10(a) of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
We will also evaluate whether issuance of a section 10(a)(1)(B) permit
would comply with section 7 of the ESA by conducting an intra-Service
section 7 consultation. We will use the results of this consultation,
in combination with the above findings, in our final analysis to
determine whether to issue a permit. If the requirements are met, we
will issue the permit to the applicant.
Authority
This notice is provided pursuant to section 10(c) of the ESA and
the National Environmental Policy Act regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
Dated: July 22, 2014.
Paul R. Phifer,
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services.
[FR Doc. 2014-18548 Filed 8-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P