Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 45340-45344 [2014-17548]

Download as PDF 45340 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 150 / Tuesday, August 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1112; fax 425–227–1149. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Saab AB, Saab Aerosystems’ EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES (j) Related Information Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2013–0172R1, dated September 6, 2013, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/# !documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0056-0002. (k) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. (i) Saab Service Bulletin 2000–38–010, dated July 12, 2013. (ii) Saab Service Newsletter SN 2000–1304, Revision 01, dated September 10, 2013, including Attachment 1 Engineering Statement to Operator 2000PBS034334 Issue A, dated September 9, 2013. (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Saab AB, Saab Aerosystems, ¨ SE–581 88, Linkoping, Sweden; telephone +46 13 18 5591; fax +46 13 18 4874; email saab2000.techsupport@saabgroup.com; Internet https://www.saabgroup.com. (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https:// www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:53 Aug 04, 2014 Jkt 232001 Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 13, 2014. Jeffrey E. Duven, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2014–17315 Filed 8–4–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2012–0268; Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–129–AD; Amendment 39–17914; AD 2014–15–12] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800, –900 and –900ER series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of incorrectly installed bolts common to the rear spar termination fitting on the horizontal stabilizer. This AD requires inspecting for a serial number that starts with the letters ‘‘SAIC’’ on the left- and right-side horizontal stabilizer identification plate; inspecting for correct bolt protrusion and chamfer of the bolts of the rear spar termination fitting of the horizontal stabilizer, if necessary; inspecting to determine if certain bolts are installed, if necessary; and doing related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of structural integrity of the horizontal stabilizer attachment and loss of control of the airplane. DATES: This AD is effective September 9, 2014. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of September 9, 2014. ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet https:// www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2012– 0268; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6440; fax: 425–917–6590; email: nancy.marsh@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a second supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all The Boeing Company Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800, –900 and –900ER series airplanes. The second SNPRM published in the Federal Register on December 9, 2013 (78 FR 73744). We preceded the second SNPRM with a first SNPRM that published in the Federal Register on March 7, 2013 (78 FR 14734). We preceded the first SNPRM with a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that published in the Federal Register on March 20, 2012 (77 FR 16188). The NPRM proposed to require inspecting for a serial number that starts with the letters ‘‘SAIC’’ on the left- and right-side horizontal stabilizer identification plate; a detailed inspection for correct bolt protrusion and chamfer of the termination fitting bolts of the horizontal stabilizer rear spar, if necessary; inspecting to determine if certain bolts are installed, if necessary, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. The NPRM also proposed to require repetitive inspections for cracking of the termination fitting at certain bolt locations, and repair if necessary. The NPRM was prompted by reports of incorrectly installed bolts common to the rear spar termination fitting on the horizontal stabilizer. The first SNPRM revised the NPRM by adding airplanes to the applicability. The second SNPRM E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM 05AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 150 / Tuesday, August 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations proposed to revise the applicable thresholds from flight cycles on the airplane to flight cycles accumulated on the affected horizontal stabilizer. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of structural integrity of the horizontal stabilizer attachment and loss of control of the airplane. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We have considered the comments received on the second SNPRM (78 FR 73744, December 9, 2013). mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES Request To Provide Instructions To Correct Errors in Service Information Europe Airpost requested that a note be included in the second SNPRM (78 FR 73744, December 9, 2013) to clarify the instructions for the re-installation of gap covers of the horizontal stabilizer and for the re-installation of the lower inboard trailing edge panels and the lower aft in-spar access doors if removed to perform actions. Europe Airpost stated that two of the four gap covers removed in Part 1, Steps f.(1) and f.(2), of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55– 1090, dated March 30, 2011, have different part numbers than the part numbers listed in the re-installation instructions in Part 9, ‘‘Close Access,’’ of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55–1090, dated March 30, 2011. Europe Airpost also stated that Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55–1090, dated March 30, 2011, does not include instructions for the reinstallation of trailing edge panels and access doors near the horizontal stabilizer. We agree with the request for the reason provided. Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55–1090, dated March 30, 2011, does not specify the correct gap cover numbers for the re-installation of the gap covers and does not specify adequate procedures for re-installation of the access doors and trailing edge panels. We have determined that operators may use their own maintenance procedures to accomplish the re-installation of the gap covers, access doors, and trailing edge panels. Therefore, we have added new paragraph (j)(6) to this final rule regarding the re-installation of gap covers, access doors, and trailing edge panels. Paragraph (j)(6) of this final rule indicates that any instructions specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55– 1090, dated March 30, 2011, regarding the removal and re-installation of gap covers, trailing edge panels, and access doors are not required by this AD. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:53 Aug 04, 2014 Jkt 232001 Request To Identify Horizontal Stabilizers Using Serial Numbers Boeing requested that the second SNPRM (78 FR 73744, December 9, 2013) be revised to allow identification of discrepant horizontal stabilizers using a list of SAIC serial numbers that Boeing stated it would provide. Boeing stated that using a list of specific serial numbers of suspect horizontal stabilizers would provide relief to operators from having to inspect stabilizers on airplanes prior to line number (L/N) 1556. We do not agree with the request because, although a list of SAIC serial numbers identifying the suspect horizontal stabilizers may relieve operators from inspecting all airplanes prior to L/N 1556 to locate discrepant parts, no such list has been provided to the FAA. Boeing may submit this information to the FAA for approval as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) using the procedures defined in paragraph (l) of this final rule. We have not changed this final rule in this regard. Request To Revise Certain Terminology Boeing and Southwest Airlines (Southwest) requested that the use of the word ‘‘install’’ in paragraph (k), ‘‘Parts Installation Prohibition,’’ of the second SNPRM (78 FR 73744, December 9, 2013) be clarified by noting that the word ‘‘install’’ means replace in this context. Southwest stated that use of the word ‘‘install’’ in paragraph (k) effectively reduces the compliance time to perform the inspections in paragraphs (g) and (h) of the second SNPRM, if the horizontal stabilizer is removed for any reason. Without added clarification, this could be interpreted to mean that any time a stabilizer is removed from an airplane for reasons not associated with this AD, and then re-installed on the same airplane, the inspections specified by paragraph (k) of the second SNPRM must immediately be accomplished. We agree to provide clarification. The intent of the ‘‘Parts Replacement Limitation’’ specified in paragraph (k) of this final rule is that operators replace parts with good parts rather than bad parts. Although the word ‘‘install’’ is generally considered to be broader than the word ‘‘replace,’’ for purposes of this AD, it should be interpreted as meaning ‘‘replace’’ while remaining within the spirit and intent of the AD. Therefore, simply reinstalling the same part during maintenance activities is acceptable for compliance with paragraph (k) of this final rule for that reinstallation. PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 45341 Request To Clarify Applicability Southwest and All Nippon Airways (ANA) requested that paragraphs (g) and (h) of the second SNPRM (78 FR 73744, December 9, 2013) be clarified to specify which airplanes are subject to the proposed requirements. Southwest and ANA requested that paragraph (g)(2) of the second SNPRM be re-worded to state that any horizontal stabilizer that can be shown to have been delivered on an airplane having a line number after L/N 1556, through use of delivery documentation, should not require inspection, regardless of where that stabilizer is currently installed. Southwest stated that if it can verify that the horizontal stabilizer was originally delivered on an airplane having a line number after L/N 1556, then that stabilizer should not require any inspections in accordance with paragraph (g) of the second SNPRM. ANA stated that, on L/N 1556 and subsequent airplanes delivered with a correct horizontal stabilizer, no inspection is necessary provided the horizontal stabilizer is not rotated among the fleet. ANA requested that the inspections in paragraphs (g) and (h) of the second SNPRM be limited to airplanes delivered prior to the effective date of this AD. We agree that the inspection requirements specified by paragraphs (g) and (h) in this final rule should be limited to airplanes delivered prior to the effective date of this AD provided the horizontal stabilizer has not been rotated among the fleet. We revised the exceptions provided by paragraphs (j)(4) and (j)(5) of this final rule to limit the applicability of those paragraphs by replacing the phrase ‘‘airplanes, regardless of line number’’ with the phrase ‘‘airplanes, with original airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of airworthiness dated before the effective date of this AD.’’ We have changed this final rule by adding paragraph (g)(3), which states: If a serial number starting with the letters ‘‘SAIC’’ is found on a horizontal stabilizer identification plate on any airplane, and the serial number of the horizontal stabilizer is the same as stated in the delivery documentation of an airplane having a line number after L/N 1556, no further action is required by paragraph (g) of this AD for that horizontal stabilizer only. We did not include L/N 1556, as requested by ANA, because L/N 1556 might be affected by the identified unsafe condition and therefore, must be inspected. We have redesignated paragraph (g)(3) of the second SNPRM as paragraph (g)(4) of this final rule. E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM 05AUR1 45342 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 150 / Tuesday, August 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations Request To Include Inspection of Additional Part Numbered Bolt Southwest and Delta Airlines requested that paragraphs (g)(3) and (j)(3) of the second SNPRM (78 FR 73744, December 9, 2013) include inspection of bolts having part number (P/N) BACB30XL so additional inspections and AMOCs will not be required if these alternative production bolts are found installed on an airplane. Delta stated that the AD needs to address the P/N BACB30XL bolts or wait until the service information is revised. We do not agree with the request because Boeing Service Bulletin 737– 55–1090, dated March 30, 2011, provides specific inspection criteria and measurements that are applicable only to bolts having P/N BACB30US. These criteria cannot be directly applied to bolts having P/N BACB30XL. The manufacturer plans to revise the service information to include bolts having P/N BACB30XL. However, to delay this final rule would be inappropriate because we have determined an unsafe condition exists and Boeing Service Bulletin 737– 55–1090, dated March 30, 2011, addresses the unsafe condition for bolts having P/N BACB30US. When the revised service information is available, we will review the service information and may approve the revised instructions as an AMOC to this final rule. We have not changed this final rule in this regard. public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes: • Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the second SNPRM (78 FR 73744, December 9, 2013) for correcting the unsafe condition; and • Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the second SNPRM (78 FR 73744, December 9, 2013). We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD. Conclusion We estimate that this AD affects 1,147 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD: We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the Costs of Compliance ESTIMATED COSTS Parts cost Action Labor cost Inspection ................................... Replacement of bolts ................. 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 per inspection cycle ................ 17 work-hours × $85 per hour = $1,445 ......................................... We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide a cost estimate for the on-condition actions specified in this AD. According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost estimate. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:53 Aug 04, 2014 Jkt 232001 $0 1,530 Cost per product $85 2,975 Cost on U.S. operators $97,495 3,412,325 products identified in this rulemaking action. the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: Regulatory Findings PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. ■ § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): ■ 2014–15–12 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39–17914; Docket No. FAA–2012–0268; Directorate Identifier 2011–NM–129–AD. (a) Effective Date This AD is effective September 9, 2014. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability (1) This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737–600, –700, –700C, –800, –900, and –900ER series airplanes, certificated in any category. (2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) ST00830SE (https:// rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_ Library/rgstc.nsf/0/408E012E008616A 7862578880060456C?OpenDocument& Highlight=st00830se) does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM 05AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 150 / Tuesday, August 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations STC ST00830SE is installed, a ‘‘change in product’’ alternative method of compliance (AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 55, Stabilizers. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by reports of incorrectly installed bolts common to the rear spar termination fitting on the horizontal stabilizer. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of structural integrity of the horizontal stabilizer attachment and loss of control of the airplane. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Inspecting the Horizontal Stabilizer and Corrective Actions For Group 1 and Group 2 airplanes identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55– 1090, dated March 30, 2011, except as provided by paragraphs (j)(4) and (j)(5) of this AD: Except as provided by paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD, at the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55–1090, dated March 30, 2011, do an inspection for a serial number that starts with the letters ‘‘SAIC’’ on the identification plates of the left- and rightside horizontal stabilizers, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55–1090, dated March 30, 2011. A review of manufacturer delivery and operator maintenance records is acceptable to make the determination specified in this paragraph if the serial number can be conclusively identified from that review. (1) If no ‘‘SAIC’’ serial number is found, no further action is required by paragraph (g) of this AD. (2) If a serial number starting with the letters ‘‘SAIC’’ is found on a horizontal stabilizer identification plate on an airplane after line number (L/N) 1556, and the serial number of the horizontal stabilizer is the same as stated in the delivery documentation of the airplane, no further action is required by paragraph (g) of this AD for that horizontal stabilizer only. (3) If a serial number starting with the letters ‘‘SAIC’’ is found on a horizontal stabilizer identification plate on any airplane, and the serial number of the horizontal stabilizer is the same as stated in the delivery documentation of an airplane having a line number after L/N 1556, no further action is required by paragraph (g) of this AD for that horizontal stabilizer only. (4) If a serial number starting with the letters ‘‘SAIC’’ is found on a horizontal stabilizer identification plate, except as specified in paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(3) of this AD: Except as provided by paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD, at the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55–1090, dated March 30, 2011, do a detailed inspection for correct bolt protrusion and correct chamfer of VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:53 Aug 04, 2014 Jkt 232001 the termination fitting bolts of the horizontal stabilizer rear spar, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55–1090, dated March 30, 2011. Concurrently with the detailed inspection, inspect to determine if any bolt other than part number (P/N) BACB30US14K() or BACB30US16K(), as applicable, is installed. Before further flight, do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55–1090, dated March 30, 2011. (h) High Frequency Eddy Current (HFEC) and Ultrasonic Inspections of Termination Fitting and Repair For airplanes identified in paragraph (g)(4) of this AD at any location where a new bolt having a P/N BACB30US14K() is installed as corrective action for damage found during any inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD: Except as provided by paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD, at the times specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55–1090, dated March 30, 2011, do HFEC and ultrasonic inspections for cracking of the forward and aft sides of the termination fitting, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55–1090, dated March 30, 2011. If any crack is found in any termination fitting: Before further flight, repair using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this AD. Repeat the HFEC and ultrasonic inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 3,500 flight cycles on the horizontal stabilizer. (i) Clarification of Compliance Time Where the compliance times stated in Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55–1090, dated March 30, 2011, are ‘‘total flight cycles,’’ the compliance time in this AD is total flight cycles accumulated on the horizontal stabilizer since new. (j) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications (1) Where Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55– 1090, dated March 30, 2011, specifies a compliance time ‘‘after the original issue date on the service bulletin,’’ this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD. (2) Where Figure 1 of Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55–1090, dated March 30, 2011, points to the location of a part number rather than the serial number, this AD requires an inspection for an identification plate with a serial number that starts with the letters ‘‘SAIC.’’ (3) If, during any inspection required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, any bolt other than P/N BACB30US14K() or BACB30US16K(), as applicable, is found: Before further flight, repair using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this AD. (4) Where Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55– 1090, dated March 30, 2011, identifies Group 1 airplanes as 737–600, –700, –800, and –900 airplanes having line numbers 379 through 1556 inclusive, this AD specifies Group 1 airplanes as 737–600, –700, –800, –900, and PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 45343 –900ER airplanes ‘‘with original airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of airworthiness dated before the effective date of this AD.’’ (5) Where Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55– 1090, dated March 30, 2011, identifies Group 2 airplanes as 737–700C airplanes having line number 496 through 1548 inclusive, this AD specifies Group 2 airplanes as 737–700C airplanes ‘‘with original airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of airworthiness dated before the effective date of this AD.’’ (6) Any instructions specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55–1090, dated March 30, 2011, regarding the removal and reinstallation of gap covers, trailing edge panels, and access doors are not required by this AD. (k) Parts Replacement Limitation As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a horizontal stabilizer on any airplane included in the applicability of this AD, unless the horizontal stabilizer has been inspected and any applicable corrective actions have been done in accordance with paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD. (l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (m) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. (m) Related Information For more information about this AD, contact Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6440; fax: 425–917–6590; email: nancy.marsh@faa.gov. (n) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM 05AUR1 45344 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 150 / Tuesday, August 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (i) Boeing Service Bulletin 737–55–1090, dated March 30, 2011. (ii) Reserved. (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https:// www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 17, 2014. John P. Piccola, Acting Manager, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2014–17548 Filed 8–4–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 117 [Docket No. USCG–2014–0670] Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Lake Washington Ship Canal, Seattle, WA Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation. AGENCY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the operating schedule that governs the Montlake Bridge across the Lake Washington Ship Canal, mile 5.2, in Seattle, WA. The deviation is necessary to accommodate vehicular traffic attending football games at Husky Stadium at the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. This deviation allows the bridge to remain in the closed position two hours before and two hours after each game. Please note that the game times for five of the seven games scheduled for Husky Stadium have not yet been determined due to NCAA television scheduling. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:53 Aug 04, 2014 Jkt 232001 This deviation is effective from 10 a.m. on September 6, 2014 through November 22, 2014. ADDRESSES: The docket for this deviation, [USCG–2014–0670] is available at https://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this deviation. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12–140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this temporary deviation, call or email Steven M. Fischer, Bridge Specialist, Thirteenth District, Coast Guard; telephone 206– 220–7277, email Steven.M.Fischer3@ uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Washington State Department of Transportation, on behalf of the University of Washington Police Department, has requested that the Montlake Bridge bascule span remain closed and need not open to vessel traffic to facilitate timely movement of pre-game and post-game football traffic. The Montlake Bridge crosses the Lake Washington Ship Canal at mile 5.2 and while in the closed position provides 30 feet of vertical clearance throughout the navigation channel and 46 feet of vertical clearance throughout the center 60-feet of the bridge. These vertical clearance measurements are made in reference to the Mean Water Level of Lake Washington. Vessels which do not require a bridge opening may continue to transit beneath the bridges during this closure period. Under normal conditions this bridge opens on signal, subject to the list of exceptions provided in 33 CFR 117.1051(e). This deviation period will cover the dates September 6, 2014 to November 22, 2014 as follows. From 10 a.m. to Noon, and from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. on September 6, 2014; from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. and from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. on September 13, 2014. The times for the closures on September 20, 2014, September 27, 2014, October 25, 2014, November 8, 2014, and November 22, 2014 will be determined and announced in the Coast Guard’s Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners as they become available. Due to NCAA television scheduling, the DATES: PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 times for the games are not currently available. The deviation allows the bascule span of the Montlake Bridge to remain in the closed position and need not open for maritime traffic from 10 a.m. to Noon, and 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. on September 6, 2014, and from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m., and 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. on September 13, 2014, for times to be determined on September 20, 2014, September 27, 2014, October 25, 2014, November 8, 2014, and November 22, 2014. The bridge shall operate in accordance to 33 CFR § 117.1051(e) at all other times. Waterway usage on the Lake Washington Ship Canal ranges from commercial tug and barge to small pleasure craft. Vessels able to pass through the bridge in the closed positions may do so at any time. The bridge will be able to open for emergencies and there is no immediate alternate route for vessels to pass. The Coast Guard will also inform the users of the waterways through our Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the change in operating schedule for the bridge so that vessels can arrange their transits to minimize any impact caused by the temporary deviation. In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridges must return to its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the designated time period. This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. Dated: July 24, 2014. Steven M. Fischer, Bridge Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. 2014–18372 Filed 8–4–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 117 [Docket No. USCG–2014–0609] Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Willamette River, Portland, OR Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the operating schedule that govern four Multnomah County bridges: The Broadway Bridge, mile 11.7, the Burnside Bridge, mile 12.4, the Morrison Bridge, mile 12.8, and the Hawthorne Bridge, mile 13.1, all crossing the Willamette River at SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM 05AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45340-45344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17548]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0268; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-129-AD; 
Amendment 39-17914; AD 2014-15-12]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The 
Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900 and -900ER series 
airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of incorrectly installed 
bolts common to the rear spar termination fitting on the horizontal 
stabilizer. This AD requires inspecting for a serial number that starts 
with the letters ``SAIC'' on the left- and right-side horizontal 
stabilizer identification plate; inspecting for correct bolt protrusion 
and chamfer of the bolts of the rear spar termination fitting of the 
horizontal stabilizer, if necessary; inspecting to determine if certain 
bolts are installed, if necessary; and doing related investigative and 
corrective actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss 
of structural integrity of the horizontal stabilizer attachment and 
loss of control of the airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective September 9, 2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of September 9, 
2014.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, 
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information 
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the 
FAA, call 425-227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2012-
0268; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket 
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and 
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer, 
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office 
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6440; fax: 425-917-6590; email: nancy.marsh@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a second supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking 
(SNPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all 
The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900 and -900ER 
series airplanes. The second SNPRM published in the Federal Register on 
December 9, 2013 (78 FR 73744). We preceded the second SNPRM with a 
first SNPRM that published in the Federal Register on March 7, 2013 (78 
FR 14734). We preceded the first SNPRM with a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPRM) that published in the Federal Register on March 20, 
2012 (77 FR 16188).
    The NPRM proposed to require inspecting for a serial number that 
starts with the letters ``SAIC'' on the left- and right-side horizontal 
stabilizer identification plate; a detailed inspection for correct bolt 
protrusion and chamfer of the termination fitting bolts of the 
horizontal stabilizer rear spar, if necessary; inspecting to determine 
if certain bolts are installed, if necessary, and related investigative 
and corrective actions if necessary. The NPRM also proposed to require 
repetitive inspections for cracking of the termination fitting at 
certain bolt locations, and repair if necessary. The NPRM was prompted 
by reports of incorrectly installed bolts common to the rear spar 
termination fitting on the horizontal stabilizer. The first SNPRM 
revised the NPRM by adding airplanes to the applicability. The second 
SNPRM

[[Page 45341]]

proposed to revise the applicable thresholds from flight cycles on the 
airplane to flight cycles accumulated on the affected horizontal 
stabilizer.
    We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of structural integrity of 
the horizontal stabilizer attachment and loss of control of the 
airplane.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing 
this AD. We have considered the comments received on the second SNPRM 
(78 FR 73744, December 9, 2013).

Request To Provide Instructions To Correct Errors in Service 
Information

    Europe Airpost requested that a note be included in the second 
SNPRM (78 FR 73744, December 9, 2013) to clarify the instructions for 
the re-installation of gap covers of the horizontal stabilizer and for 
the re-installation of the lower inboard trailing edge panels and the 
lower aft in-spar access doors if removed to perform actions. Europe 
Airpost stated that two of the four gap covers removed in Part 1, Steps 
f.(1) and f.(2), of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-1090, dated March 
30, 2011, have different part numbers than the part numbers listed in 
the re-installation instructions in Part 9, ``Close Access,'' of Boeing 
Service Bulletin 737-55-1090, dated March 30, 2011. Europe Airpost also 
stated that Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-1090, dated March 30, 2011, 
does not include instructions for the re-installation of trailing edge 
panels and access doors near the horizontal stabilizer.
    We agree with the request for the reason provided. Boeing Service 
Bulletin 737-55-1090, dated March 30, 2011, does not specify the 
correct gap cover numbers for the re-installation of the gap covers and 
does not specify adequate procedures for re-installation of the access 
doors and trailing edge panels. We have determined that operators may 
use their own maintenance procedures to accomplish the re-installation 
of the gap covers, access doors, and trailing edge panels. Therefore, 
we have added new paragraph (j)(6) to this final rule regarding the re-
installation of gap covers, access doors, and trailing edge panels. 
Paragraph (j)(6) of this final rule indicates that any instructions 
specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-1090, dated March 30, 2011, 
regarding the removal and re-installation of gap covers, trailing edge 
panels, and access doors are not required by this AD.

Request To Identify Horizontal Stabilizers Using Serial Numbers

    Boeing requested that the second SNPRM (78 FR 73744, December 9, 
2013) be revised to allow identification of discrepant horizontal 
stabilizers using a list of SAIC serial numbers that Boeing stated it 
would provide. Boeing stated that using a list of specific serial 
numbers of suspect horizontal stabilizers would provide relief to 
operators from having to inspect stabilizers on airplanes prior to line 
number (L/N) 1556.
    We do not agree with the request because, although a list of SAIC 
serial numbers identifying the suspect horizontal stabilizers may 
relieve operators from inspecting all airplanes prior to L/N 1556 to 
locate discrepant parts, no such list has been provided to the FAA. 
Boeing may submit this information to the FAA for approval as an 
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) using the procedures defined in 
paragraph (l) of this final rule. We have not changed this final rule 
in this regard.

Request To Revise Certain Terminology

    Boeing and Southwest Airlines (Southwest) requested that the use of 
the word ``install'' in paragraph (k), ``Parts Installation 
Prohibition,'' of the second SNPRM (78 FR 73744, December 9, 2013) be 
clarified by noting that the word ``install'' means replace in this 
context. Southwest stated that use of the word ``install'' in paragraph 
(k) effectively reduces the compliance time to perform the inspections 
in paragraphs (g) and (h) of the second SNPRM, if the horizontal 
stabilizer is removed for any reason. Without added clarification, this 
could be interpreted to mean that any time a stabilizer is removed from 
an airplane for reasons not associated with this AD, and then re-
installed on the same airplane, the inspections specified by paragraph 
(k) of the second SNPRM must immediately be accomplished.
    We agree to provide clarification. The intent of the ``Parts 
Replacement Limitation'' specified in paragraph (k) of this final rule 
is that operators replace parts with good parts rather than bad parts. 
Although the word ``install'' is generally considered to be broader 
than the word ``replace,'' for purposes of this AD, it should be 
interpreted as meaning ``replace'' while remaining within the spirit 
and intent of the AD. Therefore, simply reinstalling the same part 
during maintenance activities is acceptable for compliance with 
paragraph (k) of this final rule for that reinstallation.

Request To Clarify Applicability

    Southwest and All Nippon Airways (ANA) requested that paragraphs 
(g) and (h) of the second SNPRM (78 FR 73744, December 9, 2013) be 
clarified to specify which airplanes are subject to the proposed 
requirements. Southwest and ANA requested that paragraph (g)(2) of the 
second SNPRM be re-worded to state that any horizontal stabilizer that 
can be shown to have been delivered on an airplane having a line number 
after L/N 1556, through use of delivery documentation, should not 
require inspection, regardless of where that stabilizer is currently 
installed. Southwest stated that if it can verify that the horizontal 
stabilizer was originally delivered on an airplane having a line number 
after L/N 1556, then that stabilizer should not require any inspections 
in accordance with paragraph (g) of the second SNPRM. ANA stated that, 
on L/N 1556 and subsequent airplanes delivered with a correct 
horizontal stabilizer, no inspection is necessary provided the 
horizontal stabilizer is not rotated among the fleet. ANA requested 
that the inspections in paragraphs (g) and (h) of the second SNPRM be 
limited to airplanes delivered prior to the effective date of this AD.
    We agree that the inspection requirements specified by paragraphs 
(g) and (h) in this final rule should be limited to airplanes delivered 
prior to the effective date of this AD provided the horizontal 
stabilizer has not been rotated among the fleet. We revised the 
exceptions provided by paragraphs (j)(4) and (j)(5) of this final rule 
to limit the applicability of those paragraphs by replacing the phrase 
``airplanes, regardless of line number'' with the phrase ``airplanes, 
with original airworthiness certificate or original export certificate 
of airworthiness dated before the effective date of this AD.''
    We have changed this final rule by adding paragraph (g)(3), which 
states:

    If a serial number starting with the letters ``SAIC'' is found 
on a horizontal stabilizer identification plate on any airplane, and 
the serial number of the horizontal stabilizer is the same as stated 
in the delivery documentation of an airplane having a line number 
after L/N 1556, no further action is required by paragraph (g) of 
this AD for that horizontal stabilizer only.

    We did not include L/N 1556, as requested by ANA, because L/N 1556 
might be affected by the identified unsafe condition and therefore, 
must be inspected. We have redesignated paragraph (g)(3) of the second 
SNPRM as paragraph (g)(4) of this final rule.

[[Page 45342]]

Request To Include Inspection of Additional Part Numbered Bolt

    Southwest and Delta Airlines requested that paragraphs (g)(3) and 
(j)(3) of the second SNPRM (78 FR 73744, December 9, 2013) include 
inspection of bolts having part number (P/N) BACB30XL so additional 
inspections and AMOCs will not be required if these alternative 
production bolts are found installed on an airplane. Delta stated that 
the AD needs to address the P/N BACB30XL bolts or wait until the 
service information is revised.
    We do not agree with the request because Boeing Service Bulletin 
737-55-1090, dated March 30, 2011, provides specific inspection 
criteria and measurements that are applicable only to bolts having P/N 
BACB30US. These criteria cannot be directly applied to bolts having P/N 
BACB30XL. The manufacturer plans to revise the service information to 
include bolts having P/N BACB30XL. However, to delay this final rule 
would be inappropriate because we have determined an unsafe condition 
exists and Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-1090, dated March 30, 2011, 
addresses the unsafe condition for bolts having P/N BACB30US. When the 
revised service information is available, we will review the service 
information and may approve the revised instructions as an AMOC to this 
final rule. We have not changed this final rule in this regard.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, 
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting 
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial 
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the 
second SNPRM (78 FR 73744, December 9, 2013) for correcting the unsafe 
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was 
already proposed in the second SNPRM (78 FR 73744, December 9, 2013).
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the 
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 1,147 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                       Cost on
                  Action                              Labor cost            Parts cost    Cost per       U.S.
                                                                                          product     operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection................................  1 work-hour x $85 per hour =            $0          $85      $97,495
                                             $85 per inspection cycle.
Replacement of bolts......................  17 work-hours x $85 per hour         1,530        2,975    3,412,325
                                             = $1,445.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide 
a cost estimate for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.
    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be 
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected 
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected 
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost 
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, 
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive (AD):

2014-15-12 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17914; Docket No. FAA-
2012-0268; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-129-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective September 9, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    (1) This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -
700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in 
any category.
    (2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) 
ST00830SE (https://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/408E012E008616A7862578880060456C?OpenDocument&Highlight=st00830se) 
does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by 
this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which

[[Page 45343]]

STC ST00830SE is installed, a ``change in product'' alternative 
method of compliance (AMOC) approval request is not necessary to 
comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 55, Stabilizers.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of incorrectly installed bolts 
common to the rear spar termination fitting on the horizontal 
stabilizer. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of structural 
integrity of the horizontal stabilizer attachment and loss of 
control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Inspecting the Horizontal Stabilizer and Corrective Actions

    For Group 1 and Group 2 airplanes identified in Boeing Service 
Bulletin 737-55-1090, dated March 30, 2011, except as provided by 
paragraphs (j)(4) and (j)(5) of this AD: Except as provided by 
paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD, at the applicable times specified 
in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
55-1090, dated March 30, 2011, do an inspection for a serial number 
that starts with the letters ``SAIC'' on the identification plates 
of the left- and right-side horizontal stabilizers, in accordance 
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
55-1090, dated March 30, 2011. A review of manufacturer delivery and 
operator maintenance records is acceptable to make the determination 
specified in this paragraph if the serial number can be conclusively 
identified from that review.
    (1) If no ``SAIC'' serial number is found, no further action is 
required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (2) If a serial number starting with the letters ``SAIC'' is 
found on a horizontal stabilizer identification plate on an airplane 
after line number (L/N) 1556, and the serial number of the 
horizontal stabilizer is the same as stated in the delivery 
documentation of the airplane, no further action is required by 
paragraph (g) of this AD for that horizontal stabilizer only.
    (3) If a serial number starting with the letters ``SAIC'' is 
found on a horizontal stabilizer identification plate on any 
airplane, and the serial number of the horizontal stabilizer is the 
same as stated in the delivery documentation of an airplane having a 
line number after L/N 1556, no further action is required by 
paragraph (g) of this AD for that horizontal stabilizer only.
    (4) If a serial number starting with the letters ``SAIC'' is 
found on a horizontal stabilizer identification plate, except as 
specified in paragraphs (g)(2) and (g)(3) of this AD: Except as 
provided by paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD, at the applicable 
times specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service 
Bulletin 737-55-1090, dated March 30, 2011, do a detailed inspection 
for correct bolt protrusion and correct chamfer of the termination 
fitting bolts of the horizontal stabilizer rear spar, in accordance 
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
55-1090, dated March 30, 2011. Concurrently with the detailed 
inspection, inspect to determine if any bolt other than part number 
(P/N) BACB30US14K() or BACB30US16K(), as applicable, is installed. 
Before further flight, do all applicable related investigative and 
corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment 
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-1090, dated March 30, 
2011.

(h) High Frequency Eddy Current (HFEC) and Ultrasonic Inspections of 
Termination Fitting and Repair

    For airplanes identified in paragraph (g)(4) of this AD at any 
location where a new bolt having a P/N BACB30US14K() is installed as 
corrective action for damage found during any inspection required by 
paragraph (g) of this AD: Except as provided by paragraphs (i) and 
(j) of this AD, at the times specified in paragraph 1.E., 
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-1090, dated March 
30, 2011, do HFEC and ultrasonic inspections for cracking of the 
forward and aft sides of the termination fitting, in accordance with 
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-
1090, dated March 30, 2011. If any crack is found in any termination 
fitting: Before further flight, repair using a method approved in 
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this 
AD. Repeat the HFEC and ultrasonic inspections thereafter at 
intervals not to exceed 3,500 flight cycles on the horizontal 
stabilizer.

(i) Clarification of Compliance Time

    Where the compliance times stated in Boeing Service Bulletin 
737-55-1090, dated March 30, 2011, are ``total flight cycles,'' the 
compliance time in this AD is total flight cycles accumulated on the 
horizontal stabilizer since new.

(j) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications

    (1) Where Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-1090, dated March 30, 
2011, specifies a compliance time ``after the original issue date on 
the service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the 
specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Where Figure 1 of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-1090, dated 
March 30, 2011, points to the location of a part number rather than 
the serial number, this AD requires an inspection for an 
identification plate with a serial number that starts with the 
letters ``SAIC.''
    (3) If, during any inspection required by paragraphs (g) and (h) 
of this AD, any bolt other than P/N BACB30US14K() or BACB30US16K(), 
as applicable, is found: Before further flight, repair using a 
method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in 
paragraph (l) of this AD.
    (4) Where Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-1090, dated March 30, 
2011, identifies Group 1 airplanes as 737-600, -700, -800, and -900 
airplanes having line numbers 379 through 1556 inclusive, this AD 
specifies Group 1 airplanes as 737-600, -700, -800, -900, and -900ER 
airplanes ``with original airworthiness certificate or original 
export certificate of airworthiness dated before the effective date 
of this AD.''
    (5) Where Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-1090, dated March 30, 
2011, identifies Group 2 airplanes as 737-700C airplanes having line 
number 496 through 1548 inclusive, this AD specifies Group 2 
airplanes as 737-700C airplanes ``with original airworthiness 
certificate or original export certificate of airworthiness dated 
before the effective date of this AD.''
    (6) Any instructions specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-
55-1090, dated March 30, 2011, regarding the removal and re-
installation of gap covers, trailing edge panels, and access doors 
are not required by this AD.

(k) Parts Replacement Limitation

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a 
horizontal stabilizer on any airplane included in the applicability 
of this AD, unless the horizontal stabilizer has been inspected and 
any applicable corrective actions have been done in accordance with 
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.

(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local 
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending 
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 
attention of the person identified in paragraph (m) of this AD. 
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding 
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization 
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make 
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must 
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must 
specifically refer to this AD.

(m) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Nancy Marsh, 
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft 
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone: 425-917-6440; fax: 425-917-6590; email: 
nancy.marsh@faa.gov.

(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed 
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

[[Page 45344]]

    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do 
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-55-1090, dated March 30, 2011.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, 
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport 
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 
425-227-1221.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated 
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration 
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at 
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 17, 2014.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-17548 Filed 8-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.