Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Central African Republic and UNSCR 2149, 45089-45090 [2014-18331]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 149 / Monday, August 4, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
imposes no license requirement but has
potential to confuse readers about the
items’ EAR99 status.
Further, BIS received two comments
in response to the March 28, 2013
interim final rule. One commenter
stated that designating the Biosensor
System No. 1 0A521 without license
exception options other than License
Exception GOV section 740.11(b)(2)(ii)
may result in regulating the item more
restrictively than it would under the
ITAR and may result in ‘‘chilling effects
toward academic research and thereby
diminish innovation.’’ Another
commenter raised concerns that the
scope of what is covered by the No.1
0E521 ‘‘Technology’’ might be overly
broad without a reference to the General
Technology Note and that BIS should
provide guidance on how to interpret
the scope. The change of status of the
biosensor systems and related
‘‘software’’ and ‘‘technology’’ to EAR99
renders the comments moot.
Therefore, in this rule, BIS amends
the EAR to update certain entries in
Supplement No. 5 to Part 774— Items
Classified Under Export Control
Classification Numbers (ECCNs) 0A521,
0B521, 0C521, 0D521 and 0E521—
according to the procedure set forth in
the April 13 rule that established the
0Y521 series. Specifically, in this rule,
BIS removes references to biosensor
systems and related ‘‘software’’ and
‘‘technology’’ under ECCNs 0A521 No.
1, 0D521 No. 1 and 0E521 No. 1,
respectively, from Supplement No. 5 to
Part 774 of the EAR to conform with the
current legal status of those items under
the EAR and rid the Supplement of
obsolete references. The items are
EAR99 and the 0Y521 series license
requirements do not apply. This is a
technical amendment that only updates
Supplement No. 5 to Part 774 of the
EAR. It does not alter any right,
obligation or prohibition under the EAR.
Export Administration Act
Since August 21, 2001, the Export
Administration Act has been in lapse
and the President, through Executive
Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR,
2001 Comp., 783 (2002)), as amended by
Executive Order 13637 of March 8,
2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013),
and extended most recently by the
Notice of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107
(August 12, 2013), has continued the
EAR in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act. BIS
continues to carry out the provisions of
the Export Administration Act, as
appropriate and to the extent permitted
by law, pursuant to Executive Order
13222 as amended by Executive Order
13637.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:31 Aug 01, 2014
Jkt 232001
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distribute impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This final rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Control Number. This rule does
not involve any collection of
information.
3. This rule does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as that
term is defined under E.O. 13132.
4. The Department finds that there is
good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)
to waive the provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act requiring
prior notice and the opportunity for
public comment because they are
unnecessary. This rule only updates
Supplement No. 5 to Part 774 to the
EAR by removing references to certain
items to make the Supplement conform
to the current legal status of those items
under the EAR. These revisions are
merely technical and reflect what
already is in effect under the EAR in
accordance with established procedure,
and the procedure itself was proposed
to the public and the subject of public
comment. This rule clarifies
information, which serves to avoid
confusing readers about the items’
EAR99 status. It does not alter any right,
obligation or prohibition that applies to
any person under the EAR. Because
these revisions are not substantive
changes, it is unnecessary to provide
notice and opportunity for public
comment. In addition, the 30-day delay
in effectiveness required by 5 U.S.C.
553(d) is not applicable because this
rule is not a substantive rule. Because
neither the Administrative Procedure
Act nor any other law requires that
notice of proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment be
given for this rule, the analytical
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45089
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are
not applicable.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 774
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, Part 774 of the Export
Administration Regulations (15 CFR
Parts 730–774) is amended as follows:
PART 774—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 774
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C.
7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c, 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u);
42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42 U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C.
1354; 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 50 U.S.C. app. 5; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 8, 2013, 78
FR 49107 (August 12, 2013).
2. Supplement No. 5 to Part 774—
Items Classified Under ECCNs Items
Classified Under Export Control
Classification Numbers (ECCNs) 0A521,
0B521, 0C521, 0D521 and 0E521—is
amended by:
■ a. Removing and reserving the entire
entry for item ‘‘No. 1 Biosensor systems
and dedicated detecting components’’
under the section ‘‘0A521. Systems,
Equipment and Components’’;
■ b. Removing and reserving the entire
entry for item ‘‘No. 1 0D521 ‘‘Software’’
for the function of Biosensor Systems
controlled by ECCN 0A521.’’ under
section ‘‘0D521. Software’’; and
■ c. Removing and reserving the entire
entry for item ‘‘No. 1 0E521
‘‘Technology for the ‘‘development’’ or
‘‘production’’ of Biosensor Systems
controlled by ECCN 0A521.’’ under
section ‘‘0E521. Technology’’.
■
Dated: July 25, 2014.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014–17961 Filed 8–1–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 126
[Public Notice 8810]
RIN 1400–AD62
Amendment to the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations: Central African
Republic and UNSCR 2149
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\04AUR1.SGM
04AUR1
45090
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 149 / Monday, August 4, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
The Department of State is
amending the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (ITAR) to update the
defense trade policy regarding the
Central African Republic to reflect the
most recent resolution adopted by the
United Nations Security Council.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective August 4, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
C. Edward Peartree, Director, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Policy, U.S.
Department of State, telephone (202)
663–2792, or email
DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov. ATTN:
Regulatory Change, Central African
Republic.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
10, 2014, the United Nations Security
Council (UNSC) adopted resolution
2149, which called for the UN
Integrated Peacebuilding Office in the
Central African Republic (BINUCA) to
be subsumed into the UN
Multidimensional Integrated
Stabilization Mission in the Central
African Republic (MINUSCA). The
Department of State is amending ITAR
§ 126.1(u) to implement this change.
SUMMARY:
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the
opinion that controlling the import and
export of defense articles and services is
a foreign affairs function of the United
States Government and that rules
implementing this function are exempt
from sections 553 (rulemaking) and 554
(adjudications) of the Administrative
Procedure Act. Since the Department is
of the opinion that this rule is exempt
from 5 U.S.C. 553, it is the view of the
Department that the provisions of
section 553(d) do not apply to this
rulemaking. Therefore, this rule is
effective upon publication. The
Department also finds that, given the
national security issues surrounding
U.S. policy towards the Central African
Republic, there is good cause for the
effective date of this rule to be the date
of publication, as provided by 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since the Department is of the
opinion that this rule is exempt from the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, there is no
requirement for an analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not involve a
mandate that will result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:31 Aug 01, 2014
Jkt 232001
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Indian tribal governments, and will not
preempt tribal law. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175
do not apply to this rulemaking.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
The Department does not believe this
rulemaking is a major rule within the
definition of 5 U.S.C. 804.
This rule does not impose any new
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act,
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This rulemaking will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
the Department has determined that this
rulemaking does not have sufficient
federalism implications to require
consultations or warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and
activities do not apply to this
rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributed impacts, and equity).
These executive orders stress the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. The Department has
determined that the benefits of this
rulemaking outweigh any cost to the
public, which the Department believes
will be minimal. This rule has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State reviewed this
rulemaking in light of Executive Order
12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Paperwork Reduction Act
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 126
Arms and munitions, Exports.
For the reasons set forth above, Title
22, Chapter I, Subchapter M, part 126 is
amended as follows:
PART 126—GENERAL POLICIES AND
PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 126
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, 40, 42, and 71, Pub.
L. 90–629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2780, 2791, and 2797); 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22
U.S.C. 287c; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205; 3 CFR,
1994 Comp., p. 899; Sec. 1225, Pub. L. 108–
375; Sec. 7089, Pub. L. 111–117; Pub. L. 111–
266; Sections 7045 and 7046, Pub. L. 112–74;
E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129.
2. Section 126.1 is amended by
revising paragraph (u)(1) to read as
follows:
■
§ 126.1 Prohibited exports, imports, and
sales to or from certain countries.
*
*
*
*
*
(u) * * *
(1) Defense articles intended solely for
the support of or use by the
International Support Mission to the
Central African Republic (MISCA); the
UN Multidimensional Integrated
Stabilization Mission in the Central
African Republic (MINUSCA); the
African Union Regional Task Force
(AU–RTF); and the French forces and
European Union operation deployed in
the Central African Republic;
*
*
*
*
*
Rose E. Gottemoeller,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and
International Security, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014–18331 Filed 8–1–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State determined
that this rulemaking will not have tribal
implications, will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\04AUR1.SGM
04AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 149 (Monday, August 4, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45089-45090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18331]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 126
[Public Notice 8810]
RIN 1400-AD62
Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations:
Central African Republic and UNSCR 2149
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 45090]]
SUMMARY: The Department of State is amending the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to update the defense trade policy regarding
the Central African Republic to reflect the most recent resolution
adopted by the United Nations Security Council.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective August 4, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. C. Edward Peartree, Director,
Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy, U.S. Department of State,
telephone (202) 663-2792, or email DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov. ATTN:
Regulatory Change, Central African Republic.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 10, 2014, the United Nations
Security Council (UNSC) adopted resolution 2149, which called for the
UN Integrated Peacebuilding Office in the Central African Republic
(BINUCA) to be subsumed into the UN Multidimensional Integrated
Stabilization Mission in the Central African Republic (MINUSCA). The
Department of State is amending ITAR Sec. 126.1(u) to implement this
change.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the opinion that controlling the
import and export of defense articles and services is a foreign affairs
function of the United States Government and that rules implementing
this function are exempt from sections 553 (rulemaking) and 554
(adjudications) of the Administrative Procedure Act. Since the
Department is of the opinion that this rule is exempt from 5 U.S.C.
553, it is the view of the Department that the provisions of section
553(d) do not apply to this rulemaking. Therefore, this rule is
effective upon publication. The Department also finds that, given the
national security issues surrounding U.S. policy towards the Central
African Republic, there is good cause for the effective date of this
rule to be the date of publication, as provided by 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since the Department is of the opinion that this rule is exempt
from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, there is no requirement for an
analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not involve a mandate that will result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it
will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore,
no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
The Department does not believe this rulemaking is a major rule
within the definition of 5 U.S.C. 804.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This rulemaking will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, the Department has determined that this rulemaking does
not have sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess costs
and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributed impacts, and equity). These executive orders
stress the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. The
Department has determined that the benefits of this rulemaking outweigh
any cost to the public, which the Department believes will be minimal.
This rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action''
under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State reviewed this rulemaking in light of
Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation,
establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State determined that this rulemaking will not
have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not preempt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply to
this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 126
Arms and munitions, Exports.
For the reasons set forth above, Title 22, Chapter I, Subchapter M,
part 126 is amended as follows:
PART 126--GENERAL POLICIES AND PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 126 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, 40, 42, and 71, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat.
744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2780, 2791, and 2797); 22 U.S.C. 2651a;
22 U.S.C. 287c; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205; 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 899;
Sec. 1225, Pub. L. 108-375; Sec. 7089, Pub. L. 111-117; Pub. L. 111-
266; Sections 7045 and 7046, Pub. L. 112-74; E.O. 13637, 78 FR
16129.
0
2. Section 126.1 is amended by revising paragraph (u)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 126.1 Prohibited exports, imports, and sales to or from certain
countries.
* * * * *
(u) * * *
(1) Defense articles intended solely for the support of or use by
the International Support Mission to the Central African Republic
(MISCA); the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in
the Central African Republic (MINUSCA); the African Union Regional Task
Force (AU-RTF); and the French forces and European Union operation
deployed in the Central African Republic;
* * * * *
Rose E. Gottemoeller,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and International Security, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2014-18331 Filed 8-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P